Misplaced Pages

COVID-19 misinformation

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from COVID-19 conspiracy theories) False or misleading virus information

Disinfodemic – Deciphering COVID-19 disinformation, published by UNESCO
Part of a series on the
COVID-19 pandemic
Scientifically accurate atomic model of the external structure of SARS-CoV-2. Each "ball" is an atom.
Scientifically accurate atomic model of the external structure of SARS-CoV-2. Each "ball" is an atom.
Timeline
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Locations
By country and territory
By conveyance
International response
National responses
Medical response
Vaccines
Current vaccines
Variants
Variants of concern
Other variants
Economic impact and recession
By country
By sport
Impacts
Long COVID
Society
Politics
virus icon COVID-19 portal

False information, including intentional disinformation and conspiracy theories, about the scale of the COVID-19 pandemic and the origin, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease has been spread through social media, text messaging, and mass media. False information has been propagated by celebrities, politicians, and other prominent public figures. Many countries have passed laws against "fake news", and thousands of people have been arrested for spreading COVID-19 misinformation. The spread of COVID-19 misinformation by governments has also been significant.

Commercial scams have claimed to offer at-home tests, supposed preventives, and "miracle" cures. Several religious groups have claimed their faith will protect them from the virus. Without evidence, some people have claimed the virus is a bioweapon accidentally or deliberately leaked from a laboratory, a population control scheme, the result of a spy operation, or the side effect of 5G upgrades to cellular networks.

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared an "infodemic" of incorrect information about the virus that poses risks to global health. While belief in conspiracy theories is not a new phenomenon, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, this can lead to adverse health effects. Cognitive biases, such as jumping to conclusions and confirmation bias, may be linked to the occurrence of conspiracy beliefs. Uncertainty among experts, when combined with a lack of understanding of the scientific process by laypeople, has likewise been a factor amplifying conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to health effects, harms resulting from the spread of misinformation and endorsement of conspiracy theories include increasing distrust of news organizations and medical authorities as well as divisiveness and political fragmentation.

Overview

See also: Media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, Deaths of anti-vaccine advocates from COVID-19, and Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic

In January 2020, the BBC reported on the developing issue of conspiracy theories and bad health advice regarding COVID-19. Examples at the time included false health advice shared on social media and private chats, as well as conspiracy theories such as the outbreak being planned with the participation of the Pirbright Institute. In January, The Guardian listed seven instances of misinformation, adding the conspiracy theories about bioweapons and the link to 5G technology, and including varied false health advice.

In an attempt to speed up research sharing, many researchers have turned to preprint servers such as arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, and SSRN. Papers are uploaded to these servers without peer review or any other editorial process that ensures research quality. Some of these papers have contributed to the spread of conspiracy theories. Preprints about COVID-19 have been extensively shared online and some data suggest that they have been used by the media almost 10 times more than preprints on other topics.

According to a study published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, most misinformation related to COVID-19 involves "various forms of reconfiguration, where existing and often true information is spun, twisted, recontextualised, or reworked"; less misinformation "was completely fabricated". The study also found that "top-down misinformation from politicians, celebrities, and other prominent public figures", while accounting for a minority of the samples, captured a majority of the social media engagement. According to their classification, the largest category of misinformation (39%) was "misleading or false claims about the actions or policies of public authorities, including government and international bodies like the WHO or the UN".

In addition to social media, television and radio have been perceived as sources of misinformation. In the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, Fox News adopted an editorial line that the emergency response to the pandemic was politically motivated or otherwise unwarranted, and presenter Sean Hannity claimed on-air that the pandemic was a "hoax" (he later issued a denial). When evaluated by media analysts, the effect of broadcast misinformation has been found to influence health outcomes in the population. In a natural experiment (an experiment that takes place spontaneously, without human design or intervention), two similar television news programs that were shown on the Fox News network in February–March 2020 were compared. One program reported the effects of COVID-19 more seriously, while a second program downplayed the threat of COVID-19. The study found that audiences who were exposed to the news downplaying the threat were statistically more susceptible to increased COVID-19 infection rates and death. In August 2021, television broadcaster Sky News Australia was criticised for posting videos on YouTube containing misleading medical claims about COVID-19. Conservative talk radio in the US has also been perceived as a source of inaccurate or misleading commentary on COVID-19. In August and September 2021, several radio hosts who had discouraged COVID-19 vaccination, or expressed skepticism toward the COVID-19 vaccine, subsequently died from COVID-19 complications, among them Dick Farrel, Phil Valentine and Bob Enyart.

Misinformation on the subject of COVID-19 has been used by politicians, interest groups, and state actors in many countries for political purposes: to avoid responsibility, scapegoat other countries, and avoid criticism of their earlier decisions. Sometimes there is a financial motive as well. Multiple countries have been accused of spreading disinformation with state-backed operations in the social media in other countries to generate panic, sow distrust, and undermine democratic debate in other countries, or to promote their models of government.

A Cornell University study of 38 million articles in English-language media around the world found that US President Donald Trump was the single largest driver of the misinformation. Analysis published by National Public Radio in December 2021 found that as American counties showed higher vote shares for Trump in 2020, COVID-19 vaccination rates significantly decreased and death rates significantly increased. NPR attributed the findings to misinformation.

Virus origin

Further information: Investigations into the origin of COVID-19 See also: Xenophobia and racism related to the COVID-19 pandemic

The consensus among virologists is that the most likely origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to be natural crossover from animals, having spilled-over into the human population from bats, possibly through an intermediate animal host, although the exact transmission pathway has not been determined. Genomic evidence suggests an ancestor virus of SARS-CoV-2 originated in horseshoe bats.

An alternative hypothesis under investigation, deemed unlikely by the majority of virologists given a lack of evidence, is that the virus may have accidentally escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the course of standard research. A poll in July 2021 found that 52% of US adults believe COVID-19 escaped from a lab.

Unsubstantiated speculation and conspiracy theories related to this topic have gained popularity during the pandemic. Common conspiracy theories state that the virus was intentionally engineered, either as a bio-weapon or to profit from the sale of vaccines. According to the World Health Organization, genetic manipulation has been ruled out by genomic analysis. Many other origin stories have also been told, ranging from claims of secret plots by political opponents to a conspiracy theory about mobile phones. In March 2020, the Pew Research Center found that a third of Americans believed COVID-19 had been created in a lab, and a quarter thought it had been engineered intentionally. The spread of these conspiracy theories is magnified through mutual distrust and animosity, as well as nationalism and the use of propaganda campaigns for political purposes.

The promotion of misinformation has been used by American far-right groups such as QAnon, by rightwing outlets such as Fox News, by former US President Donald Trump and also other prominent Republicans to stoke anti-China sentiments, and has led to increased anti-Asian activity on social media and in the real world. This has also resulted in the bullying of scientists and public health officials, both online and in-person, fueled by a highly political and oftentimes toxic debate on many issues. Such spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories has the potential to negatively affect public health and diminish trust in governments and medical professionals.

The resurgence of the lab leak and other theories was fueled in part by the publication, in May 2021, of early emails between National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Anthony Fauci and scientists discussing the issue. Per the emails in question, Kristian Andersen (author of one study debunking genomic manipulation theories) had heavily considered the possibility, and emailed Fauci proposing possible mechanisms, before ruling out deliberate manipulation with deeper technical analysis. These emails were later misconstrued and used by critics to claim a conspiracy was occurring. The ensuing controversy became known as the "Proximal Origin". However, despite claims to the contrary in some US newspapers, no new evidence has surfaced to support any theory of a laboratory accident, and the majority of peer-reviewed research points to a natural origin. This parallels previous outbreaks of novel diseases, such as HIV, SARS and H1N1, which have also been the subject of allegations of laboratory origin.

Wuhan lab origin

This section is about misinformation related to the Wuhan laboratory origin idea. For broader coverage of this topic, see COVID-19 lab leak theory. "CCP virus", "CPC virus", "Chinese Communist Party virus", and "Communist Party of China virus" redirect here. For the virus that these names refer to, see Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. For the disease that the virus causes, see COVID-19.

Bio-weapon

One early source of the bio-weapon origin theory was former Israeli secret service officer Dany Shoham, who gave an interview to The Washington Times about the biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. A scientist from Hong Kong, Li-Meng Yan, fled China and released a preprint stating the virus was modified in a lab rather than having a natural evolution. In an ad hoc peer-review (as the paper was not submitted for traditional peer review as part of the standard scientific publishing process), her claims were labelled as misleading, unscientific, and an unethical promotion of "essentially conspiracy theories that are not founded in fact". Yan's paper was funded by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation, two non-profits linked to Steve Bannon, a former Trump strategist, and Guo Wengui, an expatriate Chinese billionaire. This misinformation was further seized on by the American far-right, who have been known to promote distrust of China. In effect, this formed "a fast-growing echo chamber for misinformation". The idea of SARS-CoV-2 as a lab-engineered weapon is an element of the Plandemic conspiracy theory, which proposes that it was deliberately released by China.

The Epoch Times, an anti-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) newspaper affiliated with Falun Gong, has spread misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic in print and via social media including Facebook and YouTube. It has promoted anti-CCP rhetoric and conspiracy theories around the coronavirus outbreak, for example through an 8-page special edition called "How the Chinese Communist Party Endangered the World", which was distributed unsolicited in April 2020 to mail customers in areas of the United States, Canada, and Australia. In the newspaper, the SARS-CoV-2 virus is known as the "CCP virus", and a commentary in the newspaper posed the question, "is the novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan an accident occasioned by weaponizing the virus at that lab?" The paper's editorial board suggested that COVID-19 patients cure themselves by "condemning the CCP" and "maybe a miracle will happen".

In response to the propagation of theories in the US of a Wuhan lab origin, the Chinese government promulgated the conspiracy theory that the virus was developed by the United States army at Fort Detrick. The conspiracy theory was also promoted by British MP Andrew Bridgen in March 2023.

Gain-of-function research

One idea used to support a laboratory origin invokes previous gain-of-function research on coronaviruses. Virologist Angela Rasmussen argued that this is unlikely, due to the intense scrutiny and government oversight gain-of-function research is subject to, and that it is improbable that research on hard-to-obtain coronaviruses could occur under the radar. The exact meaning of "gain of function" is disputed among experts.

In May 2020, Fox News host Tucker Carlson accused Anthony Fauci of having "funded the creation of COVID" through gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Citing an essay by science writer Nicholas Wade, Carlson alleged that Fauci had directed research to make bat viruses more infectious to humans. In a hearing the next day, US senator Rand Paul alleged that the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) had been funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, accusing researchers including epidemiologist Ralph Baric of creating "super-viruses". Both Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins have denied that the US government supported such research. Baric likewise rejected Paul's allegations, saying that his lab's research into the potential in bat coronaviruses for cross-species transmission was not deemed gain-of-function by NIH or the University of North Carolina, where he works.

A 2017 study of chimeric bat coronaviruses at the WIV listed NIH as a sponsor; however, NIH funding was only related to sample collection. Based on this and other evidence, The Washington Post rated the claim of an NIH connection to gain-of-function research on coronaviruses as "two pinocchios", representing "significant omissions and/or exaggerations".

Accidental release of collected sample

Another theory suggests the virus arose in humans from an accidental infection of laboratory workers by a natural sample. Unfounded online speculation about this scenario has been widespread.

In March 2021, an investigatory report released by the WHO described this scenario as "extremely unlikely" and not supported by any available evidence. The report acknowledged, however, that the possibility cannot be ruled out without further evidence. The investigation behind this report operated as a joint collaboration between Chinese and international scientists. At the release briefing for the report, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus reiterated the report's calls for a deeper probe into all evaluated possibilities, including the laboratory origin scenario. The study and report were criticised by heads of state from the US, the EU, and other WHO member countries for a lack of transparency and incomplete access to data. Further investigations have also been requested by some scientists, including Anthony Fauci and signatories of a letter published in Science.

Since May 2021, some media organizations softened previous language that described the laboratory leak theory as "debunked" or a "conspiracy theory". On the other hand, scientific opinion that an accidental leak is possible, but unlikely, has remained steady. A number of journalists and scientists have said that they dismissed or avoided discussing the lab leak theory during the first year of the pandemic as a result of perceived polarization resulting from Donald Trump's embrace of the theory.

Stolen from Canadian lab

Some social media users have alleged that COVID-19 was stolen from a Canadian virus research lab by Chinese scientists. Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada said that this had "no factual basis". The stories seem to have been derived from a July 2019 CBC news article stating that some Chinese researchers had their security access to the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, a Level 4 virology lab, revoked after a Royal Canadian Mounted Police investigation. Canadian officials described this as an administrative matter and said there was no risk to the Canadian public.

Responding to the conspiracy theories, the CBC stated that its articles "never claimed the two scientists were spies, or that they brought any version of coronavirus to the lab in Wuhan". While pathogen samples were transferred from the lab in Winnipeg to Beijing in March 2019, neither of the samples contained a coronavirus. The Public Health Agency of Canada has stated that the shipment conformed to all federal policies, and that the researchers in question are still under investigation, and thus it cannot be confirmed nor denied that these two were responsible for sending the shipment. The location of the researchers under investigation by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police has also not been released.

In a January 2020 press conference, NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg, when asked about the case, stated that he could not comment specifically on it, but expressed concerns about "increased efforts by the nations to spy on NATO allies in different ways".

Accusations by China

Further information: COVID-19 misinformation by China, Cyberwarfare by China, Propaganda in China, and Chinese information operations and information warfare

According to The Economist, conspiracy theories exist on China's internet about COVID-19 being created by the CIA in order to "keep China down". According to an investigation by ProPublica, such conspiracy theories and disinformation have been propagated under the direction of China News Service, the country's second largest government-owned media outlet controlled by the United Front Work Department. Global Times and Xinhua News Agency have similarly been implicated in propagating disinformation related to COVID-19's origins. NBC News however has noted that there have also been debunking efforts of US-related conspiracy theories posted online, with a WeChat search of "Coronavirus is from the U.S." reported to mostly yield articles explaining why such claims are unreasonable.

In March 2020, two spokesmen for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Zhao Lijian and Geng Shuang, alleged at a press conference that Western powers may have "bio-engineered" COVID-19. They were alluding that the US Army created and spread COVID-19, allegedly during the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan, where numerous cases of influenza-like illness were reported.

A member of the U.S. military athletics delegation based at Fort Belvoir, who competed in the 50mi Road Race at the Wuhan games, became the subject of online targeting by netizens accusing her of being "patient zero" of the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, and was later interviewed by CNN, to clear her name from the "false accusations in starting the pandemic".

In January 2021, Hua Chunying renewed the conspiracy theory from Zhao Lijian and Geng Shuang that the SARS-CoV-2 virus originating in the United States at the U.S. biological weapons lab Fort Detrick. This conspiracy theory quickly went trending on the Chinese social media platform Weibo, and Hua Chunying continued to cite evidence on Twitter, while asking the government of the United States to open up Fort Detrick for further investigation to determine if it is the source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In August 2021, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman repeatedly used an official podium to elevate the Fort Detrick's origin unproven idea.

According to a report from Foreign Policy, Chinese diplomats and government officials in concert with China's propaganda apparatus and covert networks of online agitators and influencers have responded, focused on repeating Zhao Lijian's allegation relating to Fort Detrick in Maryland, and the "over 200 U.S. biolabs" around the world.

Accusations by Russia

Further information: Cyberwarfare by Russia and Propaganda in the Russian Federation

In February 2020, US officials alleged that Russia is behind an ongoing disinformation campaign, using thousands of social media accounts on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to deliberately promote unfounded conspiracy theories, claiming the virus is a biological weapon manufactured by the CIA and the US is waging economic war on China using the virus.

In March 2022, amid the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Russian Defense Ministry stated that US President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, as well as billionaire George Soros, were closely tied to Ukrainian biolabs. American right-wing media personalities, such as Tucker Carlson, highlighted the story, while Chinese Communist Party-owned tabloid Global Times further stated that the labs had been studying bat coronaviruses, which spread widely on the Chinese internet for insinuating that the United States had created SARS-CoV-19 in Ukrainian laboratories.

Accusations by other countries

According to Washington, DC-based nonprofit Middle East Media Research Institute, numerous writers in the Arabic press have promoted the conspiracy theory that COVID-19, as well as SARS and the swine flu virus, were deliberately created and spread to sell vaccines against these diseases, and it is "part of an economic and psychological war waged by the U.S. against China with the aim of weakening it and presenting it as a backward country and a source of diseases".

Accusations in Turkey of Americans creating the virus as a weapon have been reported, and a YouGov poll from August 2020 found that 37% of Turkish respondents believed the US government was responsible for creating and spreading the virus.

Reza Malekzadeh, Iran's deputy health minister, rejected bioterrorism theories.

An Iranian cleric in Qom said Donald Trump targeted the city with coronavirus "to damage its culture and honor". Reza Malekzadeh, Iran's deputy health minister and former Minister of Health, rejected claims that the virus was a biological weapon, pointing out that the US would be suffering heavily from it. He said Iran was hard-hit because its close ties to China and reluctance to cut air ties introduced the virus, and because early cases had been mistaken for influenza.

In Iraq, pro-Iranian social media users waged a Twitter campaign during Trump's Presidency to end U.S. presence in the country by blaming it for the virus. The campaign centered around hashtags such as #Bases_of_the_American_pandemic and #Coronavirus_is_Trump's_weapon. A March 2020 survey by USCENTCOM found that 67% of Iraqi respondents believed a foreign force was behind COVID-19, with 72% of them naming the USA as that force.

Theories blaming the USA have also circulated in the Philippines, Venezuela and Pakistan. An October 2020 Globsec poll of Eastern European countries found that 38% of respondents in Montenegro and Serbia, 37% of those in North Macedonia, and 33% in Bulgaria believed the USA deliberately created COVID-19.

Jewish origin

See also: Antisemitic canard

In the Muslim world

Iran's Press TV asserted that "Zionist elements developed a deadlier strain of coronavirus against Iran." Similarly, some Arab media outlets accused Israel and the United States of creating and spreading COVID-19, avian flu, and SARS. Users on social media offered other theories, including the allegation that Jews had manufactured COVID-19 to precipitate a global stock market collapse and thereby profit via insider trading, while a guest on Turkish television posited a more ambitious scenario in which Jews and Zionists had created COVID-19, avian flu, and Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever to "design the world, seize countries, neuter the world's population". Turkish politician Fatih Erbakan reportedly said in a speech: "Though we do not have certain evidence, this virus serves Zionism's goals of decreasing the number of people and preventing it from increasing, and important research expresses this."

Israeli attempts to develop a COVID-19 vaccine prompted negative reactions in Iran. Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi denied initial reports that he had ruled that a Zionist-made vaccine would be halal, and one Press TV journalist tweeted that "I'd rather take my chances with the virus than consume an Israeli vaccine." A columnist for the Turkish Yeni Akit asserted that such a vaccine could be a ruse to carry out mass sterilization.

In the United States

An alert by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding the possible threat of far-right extremists intentionally spreading COVID-19 mentioned blame being assigned to Jews and Jewish leaders for causing the pandemic and several statewide shutdowns.

In Germany

Flyers have been found on German tram cars, falsely blaming Jews for the pandemic.

In April 2022, two members of the Reichsbürger movement (later implicated in the 2022 German coup d'état plot) were charged with conspiring to kidnap the German health minister Karl Lauterbach.

In Britain

According to a study carried out by the University of Oxford in early 2020, nearly one-fifth of respondents in England believed to some extent that Jews were responsible for creating or spreading the virus with the motive of financial gain.

Muslims spreading virus

Further information: 2020 Tablighi Jamaat coronavirus hotspot in Delhi

In India, Muslims have been blamed for spreading infection following the emergence of cases linked to a Tablighi Jamaat religious gathering. There are reports of vilification of Muslims on social media and attacks on individuals in India. Claims have been made that Muslims are selling food contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 and that a mosque in Patna was sheltering people from Italy and Iran. These claims were shown to be false. In the UK, there are reports of far-right groups blaming Muslims for the pandemic and falsely claiming that mosques remained open after the national ban on large gatherings.

Population-control scheme

See also: List of conspiracy theories § RFID chips

According to the BBC, Jordan Sather, a YouTuber supporting the QAnon conspiracy theory and the anti-vax movement, has falsely claimed that the outbreak was a population-control scheme created by the Pirbright Institute in England and by former Microsoft CEO Bill Gates.

Piers Corbyn was described as "dangerous" by physician and broadcaster Hilary Jones during their joint interview on Good Morning Britain in early September 2020. Corbyn described COVID-19 as a "psychological operation to close down the economy in the interests of mega-corporations" and stated "vaccines cause death".

5G mobile networks

See also: Wireless device radiation and health
Openreach engineers appealed on anti-5G Facebook groups, saying they are not involved in mobile networks, and workplace abuse is making it difficult for them to maintain phonelines and broadband.
5G towers have been burned by people falsely blaming them for COVID-19.

The first conspiracy theories purporting a link between COVID-19 and 5G mobile networks had already appeared by the end of January 2020. Such claims spread rapidly on social media networks, leading to the spread of misinformation in what has been likened to a "digital wildfire".

In March 2020, Thomas Cowan, a holistic medical practitioner who trained as a physician and operates on probation with the Medical Board of California, alleged that COVID-19 is caused by 5G. He based this on the claims that African countries had not been affected significantly by the pandemic and Africa was not a 5G region. Cowan also falsely alleged that the viruses were waste from cells that were poisoned by electromagnetic fields, and that historical viral pandemics coincided with major developments in radio technology.

The video of Cowan's claims went viral and was recirculated by celebrities, including Woody Harrelson, John Cusack, and singer Keri Hilson. The claims may also have been recirculated by an alleged "coordinated disinformation campaign", similar to campaigns used by the Internet Research Agency in Saint Petersburg, Russia. The claims were criticized on social media and debunked by Reuters, USA Today, Full Fact and American Public Health Association executive director Georges C. Benjamin.

Cowan's claims were repeated by Mark Steele, a conspiracy theorist who claimed to have first-hand knowledge that 5G was in fact a weapon system capable of causing symptoms identical to those produced by the virus. Kate Shemirani, a former nurse who had been struck off the UK nursing registry and had become a promoter of conspiracy theories, repeatedly claimed that these symptoms were identical to those produced by exposure to electromagnetic fields.

Steve Powis, national medical director of NHS England, described theories linking 5G mobile-phone networks to COVID-19 as the "worst kind of fake news". Viruses cannot be transmitted by radio waves, and COVID-19 has spread and continues to spread in many countries that do not have 5G networks.

There were 20 suspected arson attacks on phone masts in the UK over the 2020 Easter weekend. These included an incident in Dagenham where three men were arrested on suspicion of arson, a fire in Huddersfield that affected a mast used by emergency services, and a fire in a mast that provides mobile connectivity to the NHS Nightingale Hospital Birmingham. Some telecom engineers reported threats of violence, including threats to stab and murder them, by individuals who believe them to be working on 5G networks. In April 2020, Gardaí and fire services were called to fires at 5G masts in County Donegal, Ireland. The Gardaí were treating the fires as arson. After the arson attacks, British Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said the theory that COVID-19 virus may be spread by 5G wireless communication is "just nonsense, dangerous nonsense as well". Telecommunications provider Vodafone announced that two Vodafone masts and two it shares with O2, another provider, had been targeted.

By April 2020, at least 20 mobile-phone masts in the UK had been vandalised. Because of the slow rollout of 5G in the UK, many of the damaged masts had only 3G and 4G equipment. Mobile-phone and home broadband operators estimated there were at least 30 incidents where engineers maintaining equipment were confronted in the week up to 6 April. As of 30 May, there had been 29 incidents of attempted arson at mobile-phone masts in the Netherlands, including one case where "Fuck 5G" was written. There have also been incidents in Ireland and Cyprus. Facebook has deleted messages encouraging attacks on 5G equipment.

Engineers working for Openreach, a division of British Telecom, posted pleas on anti-5G Facebook groups asking to be spared abuse as they are not involved with maintaining mobile networks. Industry lobby group Mobile UK said the incidents were affecting the maintenance of networks that support home working and provide critical connections to vulnerable customers, emergency services, and hospitals. A widely circulated video showed a woman accusing employees of broadband company Community Fibre of installing 5G as part of a plan to kill the population.

Of those who believed that 5G networks caused COVID-19 symptoms, 60% stated that much of their knowledge about the virus came from YouTube. In April 2020, YouTube announced that it would reduce the amount of content claiming links between 5G and COVID-19. Videos that are conspiratorial about 5G that do not mention COVID-19 would not be removed, though they might be considered "borderline content" and therefore removed from search recommendations, losing advertising revenue. The discredited claims had been circulated by British conspiracy theorist David Icke in videos (subsequently removed) on YouTube and Vimeo, and an interview by London Live TV network, prompting calls for action by Ofcom. It took YouTube on average 41 days to remove Covid-related videos containing false information in the first half of 2020.

Ofcom issued guidance to ITV following comments by Eamonn Holmes about 5G and COVID-19 on This Morning. Ofcom said the comments were "ambiguous" and "ill-judged" and they "risked undermining viewers' trust in advice from public authorities and scientific evidence". Ofcom also found local channel London Live in breach of standards for an interview it had with David Icke. It said that he had "expressed views which had the potential to cause significant harm to viewers in London during the pandemic".

In April 2020, The Guardian revealed that Jonathan Jones, an evangelical pastor from Luton, had provided the male voice on a recording blaming 5G for deaths caused by COVID-19. He claimed to have formerly headed the largest business unit at Vodafone, but insiders at the company said that he was hired for a sales position in 2014 when 5G was not a priority for the company and that 5G would not have been part of his job. He had left Vodafone after less than a year.

A tweet started an internet meme that Bank of England £20 banknotes contained a picture of a 5G mast and the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Facebook and YouTube removed items pushing this story, and fact checking organisations established that the picture is of Margate Lighthouse and the "virus" is the staircase at the Tate Britain.

American scientist selling virus to China

In April 2020, rumors circulated on Facebook, alleging that the US Government had "just discovered and arrested" Charles Lieber, chair of the Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department at Harvard University for "manufacturing and selling" the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) to China. According to a report from Reuters, posts spreading the rumor were shared in multiple languages over 79,000 times on Facebook. Lieber was arrested in January 2020, and later charged with two federal counts of making an allegedly false statement about his links to a Chinese university, unrelated to the virus. The rumor of Lieber, a chemist in an area entirely unrelated to the virus research, developing COVID-19 and selling it to China has been discredited.

Meteor origin

In 2020, a group of researchers that included Edward J. Steele and Chandra Wickramasinghe, the foremost living proponent of panspermia, speculated in ten research papers that COVID-19 originated from a meteor spotted as a bright fireball over the city of Songyuan in Northeast China in October 2019 and that a fragment of the meteor landed in the Wuhan area, which started the first COVID-19 outbreaks. However, the group of researchers did not provide any direct evidence proving this conjecture.

In an August 2020 article, Astronomy.com called the meteor origin conjecture "so remarkable that it makes the others look boring by comparison".

NCMI intelligence report

In April 2020, ABC News reported that, in November 2019, "U.S. intelligence officials were warning that a contagion was sweeping through China's Wuhan region, changing the patterns of life and business and posing a threat to the population". The article stated that the National Center for Medical Intelligence (NCMI), had produced an intelligence report in November 2019 which raised concerns about the situation. The director of the NCMI, Col. R. Shane Day said "media reporting about the existence/release of a National Center for Medical Intelligence Coronavirus-related product/assessment in November 2019 is not correct. No such NCMI product exists".

PCR testing

Social media posts have falsely claimed that Kary Mullis, the inventor of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), said that PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 does not work. Mullis, who received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the invention of PCR, died in August 2019 before the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and never made these statements. Several posts claim Mullis said "PCR tests cannot detect free infectious viruses at all", that PCR testing was designed to detect any non-human DNA or the DNA and RNA of the person being tested, or that the process of DNA amplification used in PCR will lead to contamination of the samples. A video of a 1997 interview with Mullis has also been widely circulated, in which Mullis says PCR will find "anything"; the video description asserts that this means PCR cannot be used to reliably detect SARS-CoV-2.

In reality, the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 is highly sensitive to the virus, and testing laboratories have controls in place to prevent and detect contamination. However, the tests only reveal the presence of the virus and not whether it remains infectious.

A claim attributed to the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health that PCR testing is fraudulent became popular in the Philippines and remains a widespread belief. According to a report from AFP, research associate Joshua Miguel Danac of the University of the Philippines' National Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology debunked the claim, calling PCR tests "the gold standard for diagnosis". Fake testing and perception of fake testing remains a problem in the Philippines.

Symptoms and severity

In early 2020, there were a number of viral photos and videos that were mischaracterized as showing an extreme severity to COVID-19 exposure. In January and February 2020, a number of videos from China were circulated on social media that purported to show people infected with COVID-19 either suddenly collapsing, or having already collapsed, on the street. Some of these videos were republished or referenced by some tabloid newspapers, including the Daily Mail and The Sun. However, the people in these videos are generally believed to have been suffering from something other than COVID-19, such as one who was drunk.

A video from February 2020 purported to be of dead COVID-19 victims in China was actually a video from Shenzhen of people sleeping on the street. Similarly, a photo that circulated in March 2020 of dozens of people lying down in the street, purported to be of COVID-19 victims in either China or Italy, was in fact a photo of living people from a 2014 art project in Germany.

Incidence and mortality

Correctly reporting the number of people who were sick or who had died was difficult, especially during the earliest days of the pandemic.

In China

Chinese under-reporting during early 2020

Leaked documents show that China's public reporting of cases gave an incomplete picture during the early stages of the pandemic. For example, in February 2020, China publicly reported 2,478 new confirmed cases. However, confidential internal documents that later leaked to CNN showed 5,918 new cases in February. These were broken down as 2,345 confirmed cases, 1,772 clinically diagnosed cases and 1,796 suspected cases.

Nurse whistleblower

In January 2020, a video circulated online appearing to be of a nurse named Jin Hui in Hubei, describing a far more dire situation in Wuhan than reported by Chinese officials. However, the BBC said that, contrary to its English subtitles in one of the video's existing versions, the woman does not claim to be either a nurse or a doctor in the video and that her suit and mask do not match the ones worn by medical staff in Hubei.

The video claimed that more than 90,000 people had been infected with the virus in China, that the virus could spread from one person to 14 people (R0 = 14) and that the virus was starting a second mutation. The video attracted millions of views on various social media platforms and was mentioned in numerous online reports. The claimed R0 of 14 in the video was noted by the BBC to be inconsistent with the expert estimation of 1.4 to 2.5 at that time. The video's claim of 90,000 infected cases was noted to be 'unsubstantiated'.

Alleged leak of death toll by Tencent

In February 2020, Taiwan News published an article claiming that Tencent may have accidentally leaked the real numbers of death and infection in China. Taiwan News suggested that the Tencent Epidemic Situation Tracker had briefly showed infected cases and death tolls many times higher of the official figure, citing a Facebook post by a 38-year-old Taiwanese beverage store owner and an anonymous Taiwanese netizen. The article, referenced by other news outlets such as the Daily Mail and widely circulated on Twitter, Facebook and 4chan, sparked a wide range of conspiracy theories that the screenshot indicates the real death toll instead of the ones published by health officials.

The author of the original news article defended the authenticity and newsworthiness of the leak on a WION program.

Mass cremation in Wuhan

In February 2020, a report emerged on Twitter claiming that data showed a massive increase in sulfur emissions over Wuhan, China. The Twitter thread then claimed the reason was due to the mass cremation those who died from COVID-19. The story was shared on multiple media outlets, including Daily Express, Daily Mail, and Taiwan News. Snopes debunked the misinformation, pointing out that the maps used by the claims were not real-time observations of sulfur dioxide (SO2) concentrations above Wuhan. Instead, the data was a computer-generated model based on historical information and forecast on SO2 emissions.

A story in The Epoch Times in February 2020 shared a map from the Internet that falsely alleged massive sulfur dioxide releases from crematoriums during the COVID-19 pandemic in China, speculating that 14,000 bodies may have been burned. A fact check by AFP reported that the map was a NASA forecast taken out of context.

Decline in cellphone subscriptions

There was a decrease of nearly 21 million cellphone subscriptions among the three largest cellphone carriers in China, which led to misinformation that this is evidence for millions of deaths due to COVID-19 in China. The drop is attributed to cancellations of phone services due to a downturn in the social and economic life during the outbreak.

In the US

Accusations have been made of under-reporting, over-reporting, and other problems. Necessary data was corrupted in some places, for example, on the state level in the United States.

The public health handling of the pandemic has been hampered by the use of archaic technology (including fax machines and incompatible formats), poor data flow and management (or even no access to data), and general lack of standardization and leadership. Privacy laws hampered contact tracing and case finding efforts, which resulted in under-diagnosis and under-reporting.

Allegations of inflated death counts

In August 2020, President Donald Trump retweeted a conspiracy theory alleging that COVID-19 deaths are systematically overcounted, and that only 6% of the reported deaths in the United States were actually from the disease. This 6% number is based on only counting death certificates where COVID-19 is the sole condition listed. The lead mortality statistician at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics said that those death certificates likely did not include all the steps that led to the death and thus were incomplete. The CDC collects data based on case surveillance, vital records, and excess deaths. A FactCheck.org article on the issue reported that while 6% of the death certificates included COVID-19 exclusively as the cause of death and 94% had additional conditions that contributed to it, COVID-19 was listed as the underlying cause of death in 92% of them, as it may directly cause other severe conditions such as pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome.

The U.S. experienced 882,000 "excess deaths" (i.e., deaths above the baseline expected from normal mortality in previous years) between February 2020 and January 2022, which is somewhat higher than the officially recorded mortality from COVID-19 during that period (835,000 deaths). Analysis of weekly data from each U.S. state shows that the calculated excess deaths are strongly correlated with COVID-19 infections, undercutting the notion that the deaths were primarily caused by some factor other than the disease.

Misleading Johns Hopkins News-Letter article

In November 2020, an article by Genevieve Briand (assistant director for the Master's program in Applied Economics at JHU) was published in the student-run Johns Hopkins News-Letter claiming to have found "no evidence that COVID-19 create any excess deaths". The article was later retracted after it was used to promote conspiracy theories on right-wing social media accounts and misinformation websites, but the presentation was not removed from YouTube, where it had been viewed more than 58,000 times as of 3 December 2020.

Briand compared data from spring 2020 and January 2018, ignoring expected seasonal variations in mortality and unusual peaks in the spring and summer of 2020 compared to previous spring and summer months. Briand's article failed to account for the total excess mortality from all causes reported during the pandemic, with 300,000 deaths associated with the virus per CDC data in 2020. Deaths per age group were also shown as a proportion percentage rather than as raw numbers, obscuring the effects of the pandemic when the number of deaths increases but the proportions are maintained. The article also suggested that deaths attributed to cardiac and respiratory diseases in infected persons were incorrectly categorized as deaths due to COVID-19. This view fails to recognize that those with such conditions are more vulnerable to the virus and therefore more likely to die from it. The retraction of Briand's article went viral on social media under false claims of censorship.

Misinformation targeting Taiwan

Further information: Cross-Strait relations

In February 2020, the Taiwanese Central News Agency reported that large amounts of misinformation had appeared on Facebook claiming the pandemic in Taiwan was out of control, the Taiwanese government had covered up the total number of cases, and that President Tsai Ing-wen had been infected. The Taiwan fact-checking organization had suggested the misinformation on Facebook shared similarities with mainland China due to its use of simplified Chinese characters and mainland China vocabulary. The organization warned that the purpose of the misinformation is to attack the government.

In March 2020, Taiwan's Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau warned that China was trying to undermine trust in factual news by portraying the Taiwanese government reports as fake news. Taiwanese authorities have been ordered to use all possible means to track whether the messages were linked to instructions given by the Chinese Communist Party. The PRC's Taiwan Affairs Office denied the claims, calling them lies, and said that Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party was "inciting hatred" between the two sides. They then claimed that the "DPP continues to politically manipulate the virus". According to The Washington Post, China has used organized disinformation campaigns against Taiwan for decades.

Nick Monaco, the research director of the Digital Intelligence Lab at Institute for the Future, analyzed the posts and concluded that the majority appear to have come from ordinary users in China, not the state. However, he criticized the Chinese government's decision to allow the information to spread beyond China's Great Firewall, which he described as "malicious". According to Taiwan News, nearly one in four cases of misinformation are believed to be connected to China.

In March 2020, the American Institute in Taiwan announced that it was partnering with the Taiwan FactCheck Center to help combat misinformation about the COVID-19 outbreak.

Misrepresented World Population Project map

In early February 2020, a decade-old map illustrating a hypothetical viral outbreak published by the World Population Project (part of the University of Southampton) was misappropriated by a number of Australian media news outlets (and British tabloids The Sun, Daily Mail and Metro) which claimed the map represented the COVID-19 pandemic. This misinformation was then spread via the social media accounts of the same media outlets, and while some outlets later removed the map, the BBC reported, in February, that a number of news sites had yet to retract the map.

"Casedemic"

COVID-19 deniers use the word casedemic as a shorthand for a conspiracy theory holding that COVID-19 is harmless and that the reported disease figures are merely a result of increased testing. The concept is particularly attractive to anti-vaccination activists, who use it to argue that public health measures, and particularly vaccines, are not needed to counter what they say is a fake epidemic.

David Gorski writes that the word casedemic was seemingly coined by Ivor Cummins—an engineer whose views are popular among COVID-19 deniers—in August 2020.

The term has been adopted by alternative medicine advocate Joseph Mercola, who has exaggerated the effect of false positives in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests to construct a false narrative that testing is invalid because it is not perfectly accurate (see also § PCR testing, above). In reality, the problems with PCR testing are well-known and accounted for by public health authorities. Such claims also disregard the possibility of asymptomatic spread, the number of potentially-undetected cases during the initial phases of the pandemic in comparison to the present due to increased testing and knowledge since, and other variables that can influence PCR tests.

Disease spread

Early in the pandemic, little information was known about how the virus spreads, when the first people became sick, or who was most vulnerable to infection, serious complications, or death. During 2020, it became clear that the main route of spread was through exposure to the virus-laden respiratory droplets produced by an infected person. There were also some early questions about whether the disease might have been present earlier than reported; however, subsequent research disproved this idea.

California herd immunity in 2019

In March 2020, Victor Davis Hanson publicized a theory that COVID-19 may have been in California in the fall of 2019 resulting in a level of herd immunity to at least partially explain differences in infection rates in cities such as New York City vs Los Angeles. Jeff Smith of Santa Clara County stated that evidence indicated the virus may have been in California since December 2019. Early genetic and antibody analyses refute the idea that the virus was in the United States prior to January 2020.

Patient Zero

In March 2020, conspiracy theorists started the false rumor that Maatje Benassi, a US army reservist, was "Patient Zero" of the pandemic, the first person to be infected with COVID-19. Benassi was targeted because of her participation in the 2019 Military World Games at Wuhan before the pandemic started, even though she never tested positive for the virus. Conspiracy theorists even connected her family to the DJ Benny Benassi as a Benassi virus plot, even though they are not related and Benny had also not had the virus.

Airborne

Before mid-2021 the World Health Organization (WHO) denied that COVID readily spread through the air; although, they acknowledged such spread could occur during certain medical procedures as of July 2020. In February 2020 the Director-General of WHO, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, initially stated COVID was airborne during a press conference, only to retract this statement a few minutes later. In March 2020 WHO tweeted "FACT: #COVID19 is NOT airborne."

The air quality researcher Lidia Morawska viewed their initial position as "spreading misinformation". Hundreds of scientists, by mid 2020, viewed airborne spread as occurring and called on the WHO to change their position. Concerns were raised that "conservative voices" within the WHO committee tasked with these guidelines were preventing new evidence from being incorporated.

Surfaces

Early in the pandemic it was claimed that COVID-19 could be spread by contact with contaminated surfaces or fomites—even though this is an uncommon transmission route for other respiratory viruses. This led to recommendations that high-contact surfaces (like playground equipment or school desks) be frequently deep-cleaned and that certain items (like groceries or mailed packages) be disinfected. Ultimately, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) concluded that the likelihood of transmission under these scenarios was less than 1 in 10,000. They further concluded that handwashing reduced the risk of exposure to COVID-19, but surface disinfection did not.

Susceptibility based on ethnicity

There have been claims that specific ethnicities are more or less vulnerable to COVID-19. COVID-19 is a new zoonotic disease, so no population has yet had the time to develop population immunity.

Beginning in February 2020, reports quickly spread via Facebook, implied that a Cameroonian student in China had been completely cured of the virus due to his African genetics. While a student was successfully treated, other media sources have indicated that no evidence implies Africans are more resistant to the virus and labeled such claims as false information. Kenyan Secretary of Health Mutahi Kagwe explicitly refuted rumors that "those with black skin cannot get coronavirus ", while announcing Kenya's first case in March. This false claim was cited as a contributing factor in the disproportionately high rates of infection and death observed among African Americans.

There have been claims of "Indian immunity": that the people of India have more immunity to the COVID-19 virus due to living conditions in India. This idea was deemed "absolute drivel" by Anand Krishnan, professor at the Centre for Community Medicine of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). He said there was no population immunity to the COVID-19 virus yet, as it is new, and it is not even clear whether people who have recovered from COVID-19 will have lasting immunity, as this happens with some viruses but not with others.

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei claimed the virus was genetically targeted at Iranians by the US, giving this explanation for the pandemic having seriously affected Iran. He did not offer any evidence.

A group of Jordanian researchers published a report claiming that Arabs are less vulnerable to COVID-19 due to a genetic variation specific to those of Middle East heritage. This paper had not been debunked by November 2020.

Xenophobic blaming by ethnicity and religion

Main article: Xenophobia and racism related to the COVID-19 pandemic
UN video warns that misinformation against groups may lower testing rates and increase transmission.

COVID-19-related xenophobic attacks have been made against individuals with the attacker blaming the victim for COVID-19 on the basis of the victim's ethnicity. People who are considered to look Chinese have been subjected to COVID-19-related verbal and physical attacks in many other countries, often by people accusing them of transmitting the virus. Within China, there has been discrimination (such as evictions and refusal of service in shops) against people from anywhere closer to Wuhan (where the pandemic started) and against anyone perceived as being non-Chinese (especially those considered African), as the Chinese government has blamed continuing cases on re-introductions of the virus from abroad (90% of reintroduced cases were by Chinese passport-holders). Neighbouring countries have also discriminated against people seen as Westerners.

People have also simply blamed other local groups along the lines of pre-existing social tensions and divisions, sometimes citing reporting of COVID-19 cases within that group. For instance, Muslims have been widely blamed, shunned, and discriminated against in India (including some violent attacks), amid unfounded claims that Muslims are deliberately spreading COVID-19, and a Muslim event at which the disease did spread has received far more public attention than many similar events run by other groups and the government. White supremacist groups have blamed COVID-19 on non-whites and advocated deliberately infecting minorities they dislike, such as Jews.

Bat soup

Some media outlets, including Daily Mail and RT, as well as individuals, disseminated a video showing a Chinese woman eating a bat, falsely suggesting it was filmed in Wuhan and connecting it to the outbreak. However, the widely circulated video contains unrelated footage of a Chinese travel vlogger, Wang Mengyun, eating bat soup in the island country of Palau in 2016. Wang posted an apology on Weibo, in which she said she had been abused and threatened, and that she had only wanted to showcase Palauan cuisine. The spread of misinformation about bat consumption has been characterized by xenophobic and racist sentiment toward Asians. In contrast, scientists suggest the virus originated in bats and migrated into an intermediary host animal before infecting people.

Large gatherings

South Korean "conservative populist" Jun Kwang-hun told his followers there was no risk to mass public gatherings as the virus was impossible to contract outdoors. Many of his followers are elderly.

Lifetime of the virus

Misinformation has spread that the lifetime of SARS-CoV-2 is only 12 hours and that staying home for 14 hours during the Janata curfew would break the chain of transmission. Another message claimed that observing the Janata curfew would result in the reduction of COVID-19 cases by 40%.

Mosquitoes

It has been claimed that mosquitoes transmit COVID-19. There is no evidence that this is true.

Contaminated objects

A fake Costco product recall notice circulated on social media purporting that Kirkland-brand bath tissue had been contaminated with COVID-19 (meaning SARS-CoV-2) due to the item being made in China. No evidence supports that SARS-CoV-2 can survive on surfaces for prolonged periods of time (as might happen during shipping), and Costco has not issued such a recall.

A warning claiming to be from the Australia Department of Health said COVID-19 spreads through petrol pumps and that everyone should wear gloves when filling up petrol in their cars.

There were claims that wearing shoes in one's home was the reason behind the spread of COVID-19 in Italy.

Cruise ships as safe havens

Further information: COVID-19 pandemic on cruise ships
Claims by cruise-ship operators notwithstanding, there are many cases of coronaviruses in hot climates; some countries in the Caribbean, the Mediterranean, and the Persian Gulf are severely affected.

In March 2020, the Miami New Times reported that managers at Norwegian Cruise Line had prepared a set of responses intended to convince wary customers to book cruises, including "blatantly false" claims that COVID-19 "can only survive in cold temperatures, so the Caribbean is a fantastic choice for your next cruise", that "Scientists and medical professionals have confirmed that the warm weather of the spring will be the end of the Coronavirus [sic]", and that the virus "cannot live in the amazingly warm and tropical temperatures that your cruise will be sailing to".

Flu is seasonal (becoming less frequent in the summer) in some countries, but not in others. While it is possible that COVID-19 will also show some seasonality, this has not yet been determined. When COVID-19 spread along international air travel routes, it did not bypass tropical locations. Outbreaks on cruise ships, where an older population lives in close quarters, frequently touching surfaces which others have touched, were common.

It seems that COVID-19 can be transmitted in all climates. It has seriously affected many warm-climate countries. For instance, Dubai, with a year-round average daily high of 28.0 Celsius (82.3 °F) and the airport said to have the world's most international traffic, has had thousands of cases.

Breastfeeding

While commercial companies that make breastmilk substitutes promote their products during the pandemic, the WHO and UNICEF advise that women should continue to breastfeed during the COVID-19 pandemic even if they have confirmed or suspected COVID-19. Evidence as of May 2020 indicates that it is unlikely that COVID-19 can be transmitted through breast milk.

Sexual transmission and infertility

COVID-19 can persist in men's semen even after they have begun to recover, although the virus cannot replicate in the reproductive system.

Chinese researchers who found the virus in the semen of men infected with COVID-19, claimed that this opened up a small chance the disease could be sexually transmitted, though this claim has been questioned by other academics since this has been shown with many other viruses such as Ebola and Zika.

A team of Italian scholars found that 11 of 43 men who recovered from infections, or one-quarter of the test subjects, had either azoospermia (no sperm in semen) or oligospermia (low sperm count). Mechanisms through which infectious diseases affect sperm is roughly divided into two categories. One involves viruses entering the testes, where they attack spermatogonia. The other involves high fever exposing the testes to heat and thereby killing sperm.

Prevention

See also: List of unproven methods against COVID-19

People tried many different things to prevent infection. Sometimes the misinformation was false claims of efficacy, such as claims that the virus could not spread during religious ceremonies, and at other times the misinformation was false claims of inefficacy, such as claiming that alcohol-based hand sanitizer did not work. In other cases, especially with regard to public health advice about wearing face masks, additional scientific evidence resulted in different advice over time.

Hand sanitizer, antibacterial soaps

Washing in soap and water for at least 20 seconds is the best way to clean hands. The second-best is a hand sanitizer that is at least 60% alcohol.

Claims that hand sanitizer is merely "antibacterial not antiviral", and therefore ineffective against COVID-19, have spread widely on Twitter and other social networks. While the effectiveness of sanitiser depends on the specific ingredients, most hand sanitiser sold commercially inactivates SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19. Hand sanitizer is recommended against COVID-19, though unlike soap, it is not effective against all types of germs. Washing in soap and water for at least 20 seconds is recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as the best way to clean hands in most situations. However, if soap and water are not available, a hand sanitizer that is at least 60% alcohol can be used instead, unless hands are visibly dirty or greasy. The CDC and the Food and Drug Administration both recommend plain soap; there is no evidence that antibacterial soaps are any better, and limited evidence that they might be worse long-term.

Public use of face masks

See also: Face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic

Authorities, especially in Asia, recommended wearing face masks in public early in the pandemic. In other parts of the world, authorities made conflicting (or contradictory) statements. Several governments and institutions, such as in the United States, initially dismissed the use of face masks by the general population, often with misleading or incomplete information about their effectiveness. Commentators have attributed the anti-mask messaging to attempts at managing mask shortages caused by initial inaction, remarking that the claims went beyond the science, or were simply lies.

The U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams urged people to wear face masks and acknowledged that it is difficult to correct earlier messaging that masks do not work for the general public.

In February 2020, U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams tweeted "Seriously people—STOP BUYING MASKS! They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus "; he later reversed his position with increasing evidence that masks can limit the spread of COVID-19. In June 2020, Anthony Fauci (a key member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force) confirmed that the American public were told not to wear masks from the beginning, due to a shortage of masks, and then explained that masks do actually work.

Some media outlets claimed that neck gaiters were worse than not wearing masks at all in the COVID-19 pandemic, misinterpreting a study which was intended to demonstrate a method for evaluating masks (and not actually to determine the effectiveness of different types of masks). The study also only looked at one wearer wearing the one neck gaiter made from a polyester/spandex blend, which is not sufficient evidence to support the claim about gaiters made in the media. The study found that the neck gaiter, which was made from a thin and stretchy material, appeared to be ineffective at limiting airborne droplets expelled from the wearer; Isaac Henrion, one of the co-authors, suggests that the result was likely due to the material rather than the style, stating that "Any mask made from that fabric would probably have the same result, no matter the design." Warren S. Warren, a co-author, said that they tried to be careful with their language in interviews, but added that the press coverage has "careened out of control" for a study testing a measuring technique.

There are false claims spread that the usage of masks causes adverse health-related issues such as low blood oxygen levels, high blood carbon dioxide levels, and a weakened immune system. Some also falsely claimed that masks cause antibiotic-resistant pneumonia by preventing pathogenic organisms to be exhaled away from the body.

Individuals have speciously claimed legal or medical exemptions to avoid complying with mask mandates. Individuals have, for instance, claimed that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA; designed to prohibit discrimination based on disabilities) allows exemption from mask requirements. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) responded that the Act "does not provide a blanket exemption to people with disabilities from complying with legitimate safety requirements necessary for safe operations". The DOJ also issued a warning about cards (sometimes featuring DOJ logos or ADA notices) that claim to "exempt" their holders from wearing masks, stating that these cards are fraudulent and not issued by any government agency.

Alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs

Contrary to some reports, drinking alcohol does not protect against COVID-19, and can increase short term and long term health risks. Drinking alcohol is made with pure ethanol. Other substances such as hand sanitizer, wood alcohol, and denatured alcohol contain other alcohols, such as isopropanol or methanol. These other alcohols are poisonous, and may cause gastric ulcers, blindness, liver failure, or death. Such chemicals are commonly present in improperly fermented or distilled alcoholic beverages.

Several countries, including Iran and Turkey have reported incidents of methanol poisoning, caused by the false belief that drinking alcohol would cure or protect against COVID-19. Alcohol is banned in Iran, and bootleg alcohol may contain methanol. According to the Associated Press in March 2020, 480 people had died and 2,850 become ill due to methanol poisoning. That figure reached 700 by April.

In Kenya, in April 2020, the Governor of Nairobi Mike Sonko came under scrutiny for including small bottles of the cognac Hennessy in care packages, falsely claiming that alcohol serves as "throat sanitizer".

In 2020, tobacco smoking spread on social media as a false remedy to COVID-19 after a few small observational studies were published in which tobacco smoking was shown to be preventative against SARS-CoV-2. In April 2020, researchers at a Paris hospital noted an inverse relationship between smoking and COVID-19 infections, which led to an increase in tobacco sales in France. These results were at first so astonishing that the French government initiated a clinical trial with transdermal nicotine patches. More recent clinical evidence based on larger studies clearly demonstrates that smokers have an increased chance of COVID-19 infection and experience more severe respiratory symptoms.

In early 2020, several viral tweets spread around Europe and Africa, suggesting that snorting cocaine would sterilize one's nostrils of SARS-CoV-2. In response, the French Ministry of Health released a public service announcement debunking this claim, saying "No, cocaine does NOT protect against COVID-19. It is an addictive drug that causes serious side effects and is harmful to people's health." The World Health Organization also debunked the claim.

Warm or hot drinks

There were several claims that drinking warm drinks at a temperature of around 30 °C (86 °F) protects one from COVID-19, most notably by Alberto Fernández, the president of Argentina said "The WHO recommends that one drink many hot drinks because heat kills the virus." Scientists commented that the WHO had made no such recommendation, and that drinking hot water can damage the oral mucosa.

Religious protection

A number of religious groups have claimed protection due to their faith. Some refused to stop practices, such as gatherings of large groups, that promoted the transmission of the virus.

In Israel, some Ultra-Orthodox Jews initially refused to close synagogues and religious seminaries and disregarded government restrictions because "The Torah protects and saves", which resulted in an eight-fold faster rate of infection among some groups.

In South Korea the River of Grace Community Church in Gyeonggi Province spread the virus after spraying salt water into their members' mouths in the belief that it would kill the virus, while the Shincheonji Church of Jesus in Daegu where a church leader claimed that no Shincheonji worshipers had caught the virus in February while hundreds died in Wuhan, later caused the biggest spread of the virus in the country. In Tanzania, President John Magufuli, instead of banning congregations, urged the faithfuls to go to pray in churches and mosques in the belief that it will protect them. He said that COVID-19 is a devil, therefore "cannot survive in the body of Jesus Christ; it will burn" (the "body of Jesus Christ" refers to the Christian church).

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020, the Church of Greece announced that Holy Communion, in which churchgoers eat pieces of bread soaked in wine from the same chalice, would continue as a practice. The Holy Synod said Holy Communion "cannot be the cause of the spread of illness", with Metropolitan Seraphim saying the wine was without blemish because it represented the blood and body of Christ, and that "whoever attends Holy Communion is approaching God, who has the power to heal". The Church refused to restrict Christians from taking Holy Communion, which was supported by several clerics, some politicians, and health professionals. The Greek Association of Hospital Doctors criticized these professionals for putting their religious beliefs before science. A review of the medical publications on the subject, published by a Greek physician, claims that the transmission of any infectious disease through the Holy Communion has never been documented. This controversy divided the Greek society, the politics and medical experts.

The Islamic missionary movement Tablighi Jamaat organised Ijtema mass gatherings in Malaysia, India, and Pakistan whose participants believed that God will protect them, causing the biggest rise in COVID-19 cases in these and other countries. In Iran, the head of Fatima Masumeh Shrine encouraged pilgrims to visit the shrine despite calls to close the shrine, saying that they "consider this holy shrine to be a place of healing". In Somalia, false claims have spread Muslims are immune to the virus.

Helicopter spraying

In Sri Lanka, the Philippines and India, it has been claimed that one should stay at home on particular days when helicopters spray "COVID-19 disinfectant" over homes. No such spraying has taken place, nor is it planned, nor, as of July 2020, is there any such agent that could be sprayed.

Food

In India, fake news circulated that the World Health Organization warned against eating cabbage to prevent COVID-19 infection. Claims that the poisonous fruit of the Datura plant is a preventive measure for COVID-19 resulted in eleven people being hospitalized in India. They ate the fruit, following the instructions from a TikTok video that propagated misinformation regarding the prevention of COVID-19.

Claims that vegetarians are immune to COVID-19 spread online in India, causing "#NoMeat_NoCoronaVirus" to trend on Twitter. Such claims are false.

Vitamin D

Further information: Vitamin D § COVID-19 See also: COVID-19 drug repurposing research § Vitamin D

In February 2020, claims that Vitamin D pills could help prevent COVID-19 circulated on social media in Thailand. Some conspiracy theorists have claimed that vitamin D was being intentionally suppressed as a preventative option by governments.

One meta-analysis found weak evidence that increased vitamin D levels may reduce the likelihood of intensive care admission for people with COVID-19; but found no effect of mortality.

A preprint of a journal article from Indonesia purporting to show a beneficial effect of vitamin D for COVID-19 went viral across social media, and was cited several times in mainstream academic literature, including in a recommendation from NICE. Tabloid newspapers such as the Daily Mail and The Sun likewise promoted the story. Subsequent investigation, however, found none of the authors seemed to be known of at the hospitals listed as their affiliations, suggesting the paper was entirely fraudulent.

A study of YouTube content concerning vitamin D and COVID-19 in 2020 found that over three quarters of the 77 videos analysed as part of the study contained false and misleading information. Most alarmingly according to the study's authors, the majority of the purveyors of misinformation in these videos were medical professionals. The study concluded that much of the advice given by these YouTube videos may result in adverse health outcomes such as increases in rates of skin cancer if viewers followed it.

Vaccines

Main article: COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and hesitancy See also: General misinformation related to vaccination and immunisation and Vaccine hesitancy

In many countries a variety of unfounded conspiracy theories and other misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines have spread based on misunderstood or misrepresented science, religion, and law. These have included exaggerated claims about side effects, misrepresentations about how the immune system works and when and how COVID-19 vaccines are made, a story about COVID-19 being spread by 5G, and other false or distorted information. This misinformation, some created by anti-vaccination activists, has proliferated and may have made many people averse to vaccination. This has led to governments and private organizations around the world introducing measures to incentivize or coerce vaccination, such as lotteries, mandates, and free entry to events, which has in turn led to further misinformation about the legality and effect of these measures themselves.

In the US, some prominent biomedical scientists who publicly advocate vaccination have been attacked and threatened in emails and on social media by anti-vaccination activists.

Hospital conditions

Some conservative figures in the United States, such as Richard Epstein, downplayed the scale of the pandemic, saying it has been exaggerated as part of an effort to hurt President Trump. Some people pointed to empty hospital parking lots as evidence that the virus has been exaggerated. Despite the empty parking lots, many hospitals in New York City and other places experienced thousands of COVID-19-related hospitalizations.

In the course of 2020, conspiracy theorists used the #FilmYourHospital hashtag to encourage people to record videos in seemingly empty, or sparsely populated hospitals, in order to prove that the pandemic was a "hoax".

Treatment

Main article: List of unproven methods against COVID-19

Widely circulated posts on social media have made many unfounded claims of treatment methods of COVID-19. Some of these claims are scams, and some promoted methods are dangerous and unhealthy.

Herbal treatments

Various national and party-held Chinese media heavily advertised an "overnight research" report by Wuhan Institute of Virology and Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, on how shuanghuanglian, an herb mixture from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), can effectively inhibit COVID-19. The report led to a purchase craze of shuanghuanglian.

The president of Madagascar Andry Rajoelina launched and promoted in April 2020 a herbal drink based on an artemisia plant as a miracle cure that can treat and prevent COVID-19 despite a lack of medical evidence. The drink has been exported to other African countries.

Based on in-vitro studies, extracts of E. purpurea (Echinaforce) showed virucidal activity against coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2. Because the data was experimental and solely derived from cell cultures, antiviral effects in humans have not been elucidated. As a result, regulatory agencies have not recommended the use of Echinacea preparations for the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19.

Vitamin C

Further information: Vitamin C § COVID-19

During the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic, vitamin C was the subject of more FDA warning letters than any other quack treatment for COVID-19. In April 2021, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines stated that "there are insufficient data to recommend either for or against the use of vitamin C for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19." In an update posted December 2022, the NIH position was unchanged:

  • There is insufficient evidence for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) to recommend either for or against the use of vitamin C for the treatment of COVID-19 in nonhospitalized patients.
  • There is insufficient evidence for the Panel to recommend either for or against the use of vitamin C for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients.

Common cold and flu treatments

In March 2020, a photo circulated online showing a 30-year-old Indian textbook that lists aspirin, antihistamines, and nasal spray as treatments for coronavirus diseases. False claims spread asserting that the book was evidence that COVID-19 started much earlier than reported and that common cold treatments could be a cure for COVID-19. The textbook actually talks about coronaviruses in general, as a family of viruses.

A rumor circulated on social media posts on Weibo, Facebook and Twitter claiming that Chinese experts said saline solutions could kill COVID-19. There is no evidence for this.

A tweet from French health minister Olivier Véran, a bulletin from the French health ministry, and a small speculative study in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine raised concerns about ibuprofen worsening COVID-19, which spread extensively on social media. The European Medicines Agency and the World Health Organization recommended COVID-19 patients keep taking ibuprofen as directed, citing lack of convincing evidence of any danger.

Cow dung and urine

Indian political activist Swami Chakrapani and Member of the Legislative Assembly Suman Haripriya claimed that drinking cow urine and applying cow dung on the body can cure COVID-19. In Manipur, two people were arrested under the National Security Act for social media posts which said cow urine and dung did not cure the virus. (They were arrested under Section 153 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc. and acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony).

WHO's chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan criticised politicians incautiously spreading such misinformation without evidence.

2-Deoxy-D-glucose

A drug based on 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) was approved by the Drugs Controller General of India for emergency use as adjunct therapy in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients.

The drug was launched at a press conference with a false claim that it was approved by the World Health Organization. It was developed by the DRDO along with Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, who stated in a press release, that the drug "helps in faster recovery of hospitalised patients and reduces supplemental oxygen dependence". The Wire as well as The Hindu noted that the approval was based on poor evidence; no journal publication (or preprint) concerning efficacy and safety are yet available.

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) prescriptions

Since its third version, the COVID management guidelines from the Chinese National Health Commission recommends using Traditional Chinese medicines to treat the disease. In Wuhan, China Central Television reported that local authorities have pushed for a set of TCM prescriptions to be used for every case since early February. One formula was promoted at the national level by mid-February. The local field hospitals were explicitly TCM-oriented. According to state media, as of 16 March 2020, 91.91% of all Hubei patients have used TCM, with the rate reaching 99% in field hospitals and 94% in bulk quarantine areas. In March 2020, the online insert of the official People's Daily, distributed in The Daily Telegraph, published an article stating that Traditional Chinese medicine "helps fight coronavirus ".

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine

Further information: COVID-19 drug repurposing research § Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine § COVID-19, and Chloroquine § COVID-19

There were claims that chloroquine was used to cure more than 12,000 COVID-19 patients in Nigeria.

In March 2020, Adrian Bye, a tech startup leader who is not a doctor, suggested to cryptocurrency investors Gregory Rigano and James Todaro that "chloroquine will keep most people out of hospital". (Bye later admitted that he had reached this conclusion through "philosophy" rather than medical research.) Two days later, Rigano and Todaro promoted chloroquine in a self-published article that claimed affiliation with the Stanford University School of Medicine, the National Academy of Sciences and the Birmingham School of Medicine – the three institutions mentioned that they had no links to the article, and Google removed the article for violating its terms of service.

Ivermectin

These paragraphs are an excerpt from Ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that is well established for use in animals and people. The World Health Organization (WHO), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) all advise against using ivermectin in an attempt to treat or prevent COVID-19.

Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, laboratory research suggested ivermectin might have a role in preventing or treating COVID-19. Online misinformation campaigns and advocacy boosted the drug's profile among the public. While scientists and physicians largely remained skeptical, some nations adopted ivermectin as part of their pandemic-control efforts. Some people, desperate to use ivermectin without a prescription, took veterinary preparations, which led to shortages of supplies of ivermectin for animal treatment. The FDA responded to this situation by saying "You are not a horse" in a tweet to draw attention to the issue, for which they were later sued by three ivermectin-prescribing doctors.

Subsequent research failed to confirm the utility of ivermectin for COVID-19, and in 2021 it emerged that many of the studies demonstrating benefit were faulty, misleading, or fraudulent. Nevertheless, misinformation about ivermectin continued to be propagated on social media and the drug remained a cause célèbre for anti-vaccinationists and conspiracy theorists.

Dangerous treatments

Some QAnon proponents, including Jordan Sather and others, have promoted gargling "Miracle Mineral Supplement" (actually chlorine dioxide, a chemical used in some industrial applications as a bleach that may cause life-threatening reactions and even death) as a way of preventing or curing the disease. The Food and Drug Administration has warned multiple times that drinking MMS is "dangerous" as it may cause "severe vomiting" and "acute liver failure".

Twelve people were hospitalized in India when they ingested the poisonous thornapple (Datura stramonium AKA Jimsonweed) after seeing the plant recommended as a 'coronavirus home remedy' in a TikTok video. Datura species contain many substances poisonous to humans, mainly through anticholinergic effects.

Silver

In February 2020, televangelist Jim Bakker promoted a colloidal silver solution, sold on his website, as a remedy for COVID-19; naturopath Sherrill Sellman, a guest on his show, falsely stated that it "hasn't been tested on this strain of the coronavirus, but it's been tested on other strains of the coronavirus and has been able to eliminate it within 12 hours". The US Food and Drug Administration and New York Attorney General's office both issued cease-and-desist orders against Bakker, and he was sued by the state of Missouri over the sales.

The New York Attorney General's office also issued a cease-and-desist order to radio host Alex Jones, who was selling silver-infused toothpaste that he falsely claimed could kill the virus and had been verified by federal officials, causing a Jones spokesman to deny the products had been sold for the purpose of treating any disease. The FDA later threatened Jones with legal action and seizure of several silver-based products if he continued to promote their use against COVID-19.

Mustard oil

The yoga guru Ramdev claimed that one can treat COVID-19 by pouring mustard oil through the nose, causing the virus to flow into the stomach where it would be destroyed by gastric acid. He also claimed that if a person can hold their breath for a minute, it means they do not have any type of coronavirus, symptomatic or asymptomatic. Both these claims were found to be false.

Untested treatments

U.S. president Donald Trump suggested at a press briefing in April 2020 that disinfectant injections or exposure to ultraviolet light might help treat COVID-19. There is no evidence that either could be a viable method.

Misinformation that the Indian government was spreading an "anti-corona" drug in the country during Janata curfew, a stay-at-home curfew enforced in India, went viral on social media.

Following the first reported case of COVID-19 in Nigeria in February, untested cures and treatments began to spread via platforms such as WhatsApp.

In March 2020, the US Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested actor Keith Lawrence Middlebrook for wire fraud with a fake COVID-19 cure.

Spiritual healing

Another televangelist, Kenneth Copeland, claimed on Victory Channel during a programme called "Standing Against Coronavirus", that he can cure television viewers of COVID-19 directly from the television studio. The viewers had to touch the television screen to receive the spiritual healing.

Organ trafficking

In India, baseless rumours spread saying that people were being taken to care centres and killed to harvest their organs, with their bodies then being swapped to avoid suspicion. These rumours spread more quickly through online platforms such as WhatsApp, and resulted in protests, attacks against healthcare workers, and reduced willingness to seek COVID-19 testing and treatment.

Other

Name of the disease

Social media posts and Internet memes claimed that COVID-19 derives from "Chinese Originated Viral Infectious Disease 19", or similar, as supposedly the "19th virus to come out of China". In fact, the WHO named the disease as follows: CO stands for corona, VI for virus, D for disease and 19 for when the outbreak was first identified (31 December 2019).

Another false social media rumor claimed COVID-19 was an acronym derived from a series of ancient symbols interpreted as "see a sheep surrender."

Simpsons prediction

Claims that The Simpsons had predicted the COVID-19 pandemic in 1993, accompanied by a doctored screenshot from the episode "The Fool Monty" (where the text "Corona Virus" was layered over the original text "Apocalypse Meow", without blocking it from view), were later found to be false. The claim had been widely spread on social media.

Return of wildlife

During the pandemic, many false and misleading images or news reports about the environmental impact of the COVID-19 pandemic were shared by clickbait journalism sources and social media.

A viral post that originated on Weibo and spread on Twitter claimed that a pack of elephants descended on a village under quarantine in China's Yunnan, got drunk on corn wine, and passed out in a tea garden. A Chinese news report debunked the claim that the elephants got drunk on corn wine and noted that wild elephants were a common sight in the village; the image attached to the post was originally taken at the Asian Elephant Research Center in Yunnan in December 2019.

Following reports of reduced pollution levels in Italy as a result of lockdowns, images purporting to show swans and dolphins swimming in Venice canals went viral on social media. The image of the swans was revealed to have been taken in Burano, where swans are common, while footage of the dolphins was filmed at a port in Sardinia hundreds of miles away. The Venice mayor's office clarified that the reported water clarity in the canals was due to the lack of sediment being kicked up by boat traffic, not a reduction in water pollution as initially reported.

Following the lockdown of India, a video clip purporting to show the extremely rare Malabar civet (a critically endangered, possibly extinct, species) walking the empty streets of Meppayur went viral on social media. Experts later identified the civet in the video as actually being the much commoner small Indian civet. Another viral Indian video clip showed a pod of humpback whales allegedly returning to the Arabian Sea offshore from Mumbai following the shutdown of shipping routes; however, this video was found to have actually been taken in 2019 in the Java Sea.

Virus remains in body permanently

It has been wrongly claimed that anyone infected with COVID-19 will have the virus in their bodies for life. While there is no curative treatment, most infected people recover from the disease and eliminate the virus from their bodies.

COVID-19 denialism

"COVID is a lie" graffiti in Pontefract, West Yorkshire, England

COVID-19 denialism or merely COVID denialism is the thinking of those who deny the COVID-19 pandemic, or deny that deaths are happening in the manner or proportions scientifically recognized by the World Health Organization. The claims that the COVID-19 pandemic has been faked, exaggerated, or mischaracterized are pseudoscience. Some famous people who have engaged in COVID-19 denialism include businessman Elon Musk, former U.S. President Donald Trump, and former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.

Antisemitism

An October 2021 report by the UK-based anti-racism group Hope not Hate found that COVID-19 conspiracy theories were a primary gateway into antisemitic rhetoric, due to what they described as "conspiratorial antisemitism". According to the report, "An important bridge between COVID-19 conspiracy theories and antisemitism are ideologies that provide overarching explanations for smaller alleged deceptions. For example, the need for anti-5G campaigners to explain why telecom companies, healthcare providers and authorities are conspiring to expose the population to supposedly dangerous radiation has driven attention towards 'superconspiracies'."

Also in October 2021, the fact-checking organisation Logically found that antisemitic conspiracy theories related to the pandemic were being promoted on one of the largest COVID-19 conspiracy groups on Telegram, including posts highlighting Jewish people in leadership positions at Moderna, Pfizer, the CDC and US President Joe Biden's White House, and claims that mask and vaccine mandates were similar to the Holocaust.

US anti-vax anti-China covert operation

At the beginning of the pandemic, Philippine President Duterte had sought Chinese assistance for vaccines, easing claims in the South China Sea, and improving relations between the two countries. To counter China's influence in the Philippines, under Donald Trump's presidency, the US military conducted a covert operation aimed at spreading doubts about the safety of Chinese aid, including vaccines. This campaign of misinformation has contributed to low vaccination coverage and increased death rates from COVID-19 in the Philippines. Health experts condemned these actions, pointing out the damage done to public trust and global health. The operation involved the creation of fake social media accounts posing as Filipinos and spreading anti-vaccine messages. The campaign was described by then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper as "payback" for COVID-19 disinformation by China directed against the U.S.

The operation spread to other regions such as in the Middle East and Central Asia like Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, where the Pentagon aimed to intensify fears that the Chinese vaccine produced by Sinovac Biotech contained pork derivatives, and could be considered "haram", i.e. forbidden by Islamic law.

The operation ended in mid-2021, when the Biden administration banned the anti-vaccine campaign.

Efforts to combat misinformation

Further information: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on journalism
International Telecommunication Union

In February 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) described a "massive infodemic", citing an over-abundance of reported information, which was false, about the virus that "makes it hard for people to find trustworthy sources and reliable guidance when they need it". The WHO stated that the high demand for timely and trustworthy information has incentivised the creation of a direct WHO 24/7 myth-busting hotline where its communication and social media teams have been monitoring and responding to misinformation through its website and social media pages. The WHO specifically debunked several claims as false, including the claim that a person can tell if they have the virus or not simply by holding their breath; the claim that drinking large amounts of water will protect against the virus; and the claim that gargling salt water prevents infection.

Social media

See also: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social media

In early February 2020, Facebook, Twitter, and Google announced that they were working with WHO to address misinformation on their platforms. In a blog post, Facebook stated that it would remove content flagged by global health organizations and local authorities that violate its content policy on misinformation leading to "physical harm". Facebook is also giving free advertising to WHO. Nonetheless, a week after Trump's speculation that sunlight could kill the virus, The New York Times found "780 Facebook groups, 290 Facebook pages, nine Instagram accounts and thousands of tweets pushing UV light therapies", material which those companies declined to remove from their platforms. In August 2020, Facebook removed seven million posts with misinformation about COVID-19.

At the end of February 2020, Amazon removed more than a million products that claimed to cure or protect against COVID-19, and removed tens of thousands of listings for health products whose prices were "significantly higher than recent prices offered on or off Amazon", although numerous items were "still being sold at unusually high prices" as of 28 February.

Millions of instances of COVID-19 misinformation have occurred across multiple online platforms. Other researchers monitoring the spread of fake news observed certain rumors started in China; many of them later spread to Korea and the United States, prompting several universities in Korea to start the multilingual "Facts Before Rumors" campaign to evaluate common claims seen online. The proliferation of such misinformation on social media has led to workshops for the application of machine learning resources to detect misinformation.

Party and ideology partisanship has also contributed to the public's lack of trust in messages delivered via social media channels, leading to a greater proclivity to follow fake news and misinformation campaigns. According to research, COVID mass media communication should prioritize increasing trust in scientific medicine over attempting to bridge the issue's partisan divide.

In addition, the divisive nature of the issue, being mired in existing political tensions, has led to online bullying of scientists.

Misplaced Pages

Further information: Misplaced Pages coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic

The media have praised Misplaced Pages's coverage of COVID-19 and its combating the inclusion of misinformation through efforts led by the English-language Misplaced Pages's WikiProject Medicine, among other groups. From May 2020, Misplaced Pages's consensus for the COVID-19 pandemic page has been to "not mention the theory that the virus was accidentally leaked from a laboratory in the article." However, in June 2021, Misplaced Pages editors began debating the inclusion of the lab leak hypothesis. WHO began working with Misplaced Pages to provide much of its infographics and reports on COVID-19 to help fight misinformation, with plans to use similar approaches for fighting misinformation about other infectious diseases in the future.

Newspapers and scholarly journals

Initially, many newspapers with paywalls lowered them for some or all their COVID-19 coverage. Many scientific publishers made scientific papers related to the outbreak open access (free).

The scientific publishing community, while intent on producing quality scholarly publications, has itself been negatively impacted by the infiltration of inferior or false research leading to the retraction of several articles on the topic of COVID-19, as well as polluting valid and reliable scientific study, bringing into question the reliability of research undertaken. Retraction Watch maintains a database of retracted COVID-19 articles.

Podcasts

In January 2022, 270 US healthcare professionals, scientists and professors wrote an open letter to Spotify complaining that podcast host Joe Rogan had a "concerning history of broadcasting misinformation, particularly regarding the Covid-19 pandemic" and describing him as a "menace to public health". This was in part due to Rogan platforming and promoting the conspiracy theories of Robert W. Malone who was one of two recent guests on The Joe Rogan Experience who compared pandemic policies to the holocaust. The letter described the interview as a "mass-misinformation events of this scale have extraordinarily dangerous ramifications".

Government censorship

In many countries, censorship was performed by governments, with "fake news" laws being enacted to criminalize certain types of speech regarding COVID-19. Often, people were arrested for making posts online.

In March 2020, the Turkish Interior Ministry reported 93 suspects and 19 arrests of social media users whose posts were "targeting officials and spreading panic and fear by suggesting the virus had spread widely in Turkey and that officials had taken insufficient measures". In April 2020, Iran's military said that 3600 people had been arrested for "spreading rumors" about COVID-19 in the country. In Cambodia, at least 17 individuals who expressed concerns about the spread of COVID-19 were arrested between January and March 2020 on "fake news" charges. In April 2020, Algerian lawmakers passed a law criminalizing "fake news" deemed harmful to "public order and state security".

In the Philippines, China, India, Egypt, Ethiopia, Bangladesh, Morocco, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Iran, Vietnam, Laos, Indonesia, Mongolia, Sri Lanka, Kenya, South Africa, Côte d'Ivoire, Somalia, Mauritius, Zimbabwe, Thailand, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Montenegro, Serbia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong, people have been arrested for allegedly spreading false information about the COVID-19 pandemic. The United Arab Emirates has introduced criminal penalties for the spread of misinformation and rumours related to the outbreak. Myanmar blocked access to 221 news websites, including several leading media outlets.

In the United States, some elected officials aided the spread of misinformation. In January 2022, Congressman Troy Nehls entered a full transcript of the Malone interview on The Joe Rogan Experience into the Congressional Record in order to circumvent what he said was censorship by social media.

Scams

The WHO has warned of criminal scams involving perpetrators who misrepresent themselves as representatives of the WHO seeking personal information from victims. The Federal Communications Commission has advised consumers not to click on links in suspicious emails and not to give out personal information. The Federal Trade Commission has also warned of charity scams related to the pandemic.

Cybersecurity firm Check Point stated there has been a large increase in phishing attacks to lure victims into unwittingly installing a computer virus under the guise of emails related to COVID-19 containing attachments. Cyber-criminals use deceptive domains such as "cdc-gov.org" instead of the correct "cdc.gov", or even spoof the original domain so it resembles specific websites. More than 4,000 domains related to COVID-19 have been registered.

Police in New Jersey, United States, reported incidents of criminals knocking on people's doors and claiming to be from the CDC. They then attempt to sell products at inflated prices or otherwise scam victims under the guise of educating and protecting the public from COVID-19.

Links that purportedly direct to the Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 map, but instead direct to a false site that spreads malware, have been circulating on the Internet.

Since the passage in March 2020, of the CARES Act, criminals have taken advantage of the stimulus bill by asking people to pay in advance to receive their stimulus payment. Because of this, the IRS has advised consumers to only use the official IRS COVID-19 web address to submit information to the IRS (and not in response to a text, email, or phone call). In response to these schemes, many financial companies, like Wells Fargo and LoanDepot, as well as health insurers, like Humana, for example, have posted similar advisories on their websites.

See also

Notes

  1. Multiple conspiracy articles in Chinese from the SARS era resurfaced during the outbreak with altered details, claiming SARS is biological warfare. Some said BGI Group from China sold genetic information of the Chinese people to the US, which then specifically targeted the genome of Chinese individuals. In January 2020, Chinese military enthusiast website Xilu published an article, claimed how the US artificially combined the virus to "precisely target Chinese people." The article was removed in early February. The article was further distorted on social media in Taiwan, which claimed "Top Chinese military website admitted novel coronavirus was Chinese-made bioweapon." Taiwan Fact-check center debunked the original article and its divergence, suggesting the original Xilu article distorted the conclusion from a legitimate research on Chinese scientific magazine Science China Life Sciences, which never mentioned the virus was engineered. The fact-check center explained Xilu is a military enthusiastic tabloid established by a private company, thus it does not represent the voice of Chinese military. Some articles on popular sites in China have also cast suspicion on US military athletes participating in the Wuhan 2019 Military World Games, which lasted until the end of October 2019, and have suggested they deployed the virus. They claim the inattentive attitude and disproportionately below-average results of American athletes in the games indicate they might have been there for other purposes and they might actually be bio-warfare operatives. Such posts stated that their place of residence during their stay in Wuhan was also close to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, where the first known cluster of cases occurred. In March 2020, this conspiracy theory was endorsed by Zhao Lijian, a spokesperson from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. In March 2020, the US government summoned Chinese Ambassador Cui Tiankai to Washington over the coronavirus conspiracy theory. Over the next month, conspiracy theorists narrowed their focus to one US Army Reservist, a woman who participated in the games in Wuhan as a cyclist, claiming she is "patient zero." According to a CNN report, these theories have been spread by George Webb, who has nearly 100,000 followers on YouTube, and have been amplified by Chinese Communist Party media, for example the CPC-owned newspaper Global Times.
  2. The acting assistant secretary of state for Europe and Eurasia, Philip Reeker, said "Russia's intent is to sow discord and undermine U.S. institutions and alliances from within" and "by spreading disinformation about coronavirus, Russian malign actors are once again choosing to threaten public safety by distracting from the global health response." Russia denies the allegation, saying "this is a deliberately false story." According to US-based The National Interest magazine, although official Russian channels had been muted on pushing the US biowarfare conspiracy theory, other Russian media elements do not share the Kremlin's restraint. Zvezda, a news outlet funded by the Russian Defense Ministry, published an article titled "Coronavirus: American biological warfare against Russia and China", claiming that the virus is intended to damage the Chinese economy, weakening its hand in the next round of trade negotiations. Ultra-nationalist politician and leader of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, claimed on a Moscow radio station that the virus was an experiment by the Pentagon and pharmaceutical companies. Politician Igor Nikulin made rounds on Russian television and news media, arguing that Wuhan was chosen for the attack because the presence of a BSL-4 virus lab provided a cover story for the Pentagon and CIA about a Chinese bio-experiment leak. An EU-document claims 80 attempts by Russian media to spread disinformation related to the epidemic. According to the East StratCom Task Force, the Russian-funded Sputnik news agency had published stories speculating that the virus could have been invented in Latvia (by a Latvian affiliate), that it was used by Chinese Communist Party to curb protests in Hong Kong, that it was introduced intentionally to reduce the number of elder people in Italy, that it was targeted against the Yellow Vests movement, and making many other speculations. Sputnik branches in countries including Armenia, Belarus, Spain, and in the Middle East came up with versions of these stories.
  3. Iraqi political analyst Sabah Al-Akili on Al-Etejah TV, Saudi daily Al-Watan writer Sa'ud Al-Shehry, Syrian daily Al-Thawra columnist Hussein Saqer, and Egyptian journalist Ahmad Rif'at on Egyptian news website Vetogate, were some examples given by MEMRI as propagators of the US biowarfare conspiracy theory in the Arabic world.
  4. According to Radio Farda, Iranian cleric Seyyed Mohammad Saeedi accused US President Donald Trump of targeting Qom with coronavirus "to damage its culture and honor." Saeedi claimed that Trump is fulfilling his promise to hit Iranian cultural sites, if Iranians took revenge for the airstrike that killed of Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani. Iranian TV personality Ali Akbar Raefipour claimed the coronavirus was part of a "hybrid warfare" programme waged by the United States on Iran and China. Brigadier General Gholam Reza Jalali, head of Iranian Civil Defense Organization, claimed the coronavirus is likely a biological attack on China and Iran with economic goals. Hossein Salami, the head of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), claimed that the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran may be due to a US "biological attack." Several Iranian politicians, including Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, Rasoul Falahati, Alireza Panahian, Abolfazl Hasanbeigi and Gholamali Jafarzadeh Imanabadi, also made similar remarks. Iranian Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, made similar suggestions. Former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sent a letter to the United Nations in March 2020, claiming that "it is clear to the world that the mutated coronavirus was produced in lab" and that COVID-19 is "a new weapon for establishing and/or maintaining political and economic upper hand in the global arena." The late Ayatollah Hashem Bathaie Golpayegani claimed that "America is the source of coronavirus, because America went head to head with China and realised it cannot keep up with it economically or militarily." Reza Malekzadeh, Iran's deputy health minister and former Minister of Health, rejected claims that the virus was a biological weapon, pointing out that the US would be suffering heavily from it. He said Iran was hard-hit because its close ties to China and reluctance to cut air ties introduced the virus, and because early cases had been mistaken for influenza.
  5. A Filipino Senator, Tito Sotto, played a bioweapon conspiracy video in a February 2020 Senate hearing, suggesting the coronavirus is biowarfare waged against China.
  6. Venezuela Constituent Assembly member Elvis Méndez declared that the coronavirus was a "bacteriological sickness created in '89, in '90 and historically" and that it was a sickness "inoculated by the gringos." Méndez theorized that the virus was a weapon against Latin America and China and that its purpose was "to demoralize the person, to weaken to install their system." President Nicolás Maduro made similar claims, claiming that the epidemic was a biological weapon targeted at China.

References

  1. Murphy H, Di Stefano M, Manson K (20 March 2020). "Huge text message campaigns spread coronavirus fake news". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 25 March 2020. Retrieved 25 March 2020.
  2. "Fraudulent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Products". U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 4 January 2021. Archived from the original on 5 March 2021. Retrieved 5 January 2021.
  3. Kowalczyk O, Roszkowski K, Montane X, Pawliszak W, Tylkowski B, Bajek A (December 2020). "Religion and Faith Perception in a Pandemic of COVID-19". Journal of Religion and Health. 59 (6): 2671–2677. doi:10.1007/s10943-020-01088-3. ISSN 0022-4197. PMC 7549332. PMID 33044598.
  4. "COVID: Top 10 current conspiracy theories". Alliance for Science. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 5 January 2021.
  5. Kassam N (25 March 2020). "Disinformation and coronavirus". The Interpreter. Lowy Institute. Archived from the original on 8 May 2020. Retrieved 25 March 2020.
  6. Kuhn SA, Lieb R, Freeman D, Andreou C, Zander-Schellenberg T (March 2021). "Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia". Psychological Medicine. 52 (16): 4162–4176. doi:10.1017/S0033291721001124. PMC 8027560. PMID 33722315.
  7. Nadesan M (28 April 2022). "Crises Narratives Defining the COVID-19 Pandemic: Expert Uncertainties and Conspiratorial Sensemaking". American Behavioral Scientist. doi:10.1177/00027642221085893. PMC 9051992.
  8. Radford B (November–December 2020). "Conspiracy Theories Grow as COVID-19 Spreads". Skeptical Inquirer. Amherst, New York: Center for Inquiry. p. 5. Archived from the original on 19 May 2023. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
  9. ^ "China coronavirus: Misinformation spreads online about origin and scale". BBC News. 30 January 2020. Archived from the original on 4 February 2020. Retrieved 10 February 2020.
  10. Shmerling RH (1 February 2020). "Be careful where you get your news about coronavirus". Harvard Health Blog. Archived from the original on 2 March 2020. Retrieved 25 March 2020.
  11. Taylor J (31 January 2020). "Bat soup, dodgy cures and 'diseasology': the spread of coronavirus misinformation". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2 February 2020. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
  12. Majumder MS, Mandl KD (May 2020). "Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility". The Lancet. Global Health. 8 (5): e627–e630. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30113-3. PMC 7159059. PMID 32220289.
  13. Oransky I, Marcus A (3 February 2020). "Quick retraction of a faulty coronavirus paper was a good moment for science". Stat. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 21 April 2020.
  14. Rogers A (31 January 2020). "Coronavirus Research Is Moving at Top Speed – With a Catch". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on 4 May 2020. Retrieved 13 February 2020.
  15. Besançon L, Peiffer-Smadja N, Segalas C, Jiang H, Masuzzo P, Smout C, et al. (June 2021). "Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic". BMC Medical Research Methodology. 21 (1): 117. bioRxiv 10.1101/2020.08.13.249847. doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y. PMC 8179078. PMID 34090351. S2CID 221141998.
  16. Brennen JS, Simon F, Howard PN, Nielsen RK (7 April 2020). "Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation". Reuters Institute. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 21 April 2020.
  17. Darcy O (13 March 2020). "How Fox News misled viewers about the coronavirus". CNN. Archived from the original on 8 December 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2021.
  18. Motta M. "How Right-Leaning Media Coverage of COVID-19 Facilitated the Spread of Misinformation in the Early Stages of the Pandemic". osf.io. Archived from the original on 23 December 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2021.
  19. Rieger JM (19 March 2020). "Sean Hannity denied calling coronavirus a hoax nine days after he called coronavirus a hoax". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 7 December 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2021.
  20. Bursztyn L, Rao A, Roth C, Yanagizawa-Drott D (19 April 2020). "Misinformation During a Pandemic". Becker Friedman Institute for Economics at the University of Chicago. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 21 April 2020.
  21. Visentin L (10 August 2021). "Sky News hosts silent as the channel deletes unproven COVID-19 treatment videos". The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 11 August 2021. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
  22. Farhi P (1 September 2021). "Four conservative radio talk-show hosts bashed coronavirus vaccines. Then they got sick". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 1 September 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2021.
  23. Gabbatt A (21 September 2021). "Dangerous transmissions: anti-vax radio shows reach millions in US while stars die of Covid". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 21 September 2021. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
  24. Wilson J (19 March 2020). "Disinformation and blame: how America's far right is capitalizing on coronavirus". The Grenadian. Archived from the original on 13 February 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2020.
  25. "Analysis: Is China finding scapegoats in its coronavirus narrative?". BBC Monitoring. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2020.
  26. Broderick R (22 April 2020). "Scientists Haven't Found Proof The Coronavirus Escaped From A Lab in Wuhan. Trump Supporters Are Spreading The Rumor Anyway". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on 28 April 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2020.
  27. Rankin J (10 June 2020). "EU says China behind 'huge wave' of Covid-19 disinformation". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 March 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2020.
  28. Galloway A (16 June 2020). "Foreign Minister Marise Payne hits out at Chinese, Russian 'disinformation'". The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
  29. Brewster T (15 April 2020). "Iran-Linked Group Caught Spreading COVID-19 'Disinformation' On Facebook And Instagram". Forbes. Archived from the original on 9 May 2020. Retrieved 20 May 2020.
  30. Emmot R (18 March 2020). "Russia deploying coronavirus disinformation to sow panic in West, EU document says". Reuters. Archived from the original on 8 June 2020. Retrieved 11 May 2020.
  31. Stolberg SG, Weiland N (22 October 2020). "Study Finds 'Single Largest Driver' of Coronavirus Misinformation: Trump". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 26 October 2020.(Study Archived 14 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine)
  32. Covid-19: why vaccine mistrust is growing. YouTube. The Economist. 18 November 2020. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2021.
  33. Wood D, Brumfiel G (5 December 2021). "Pro-Trump counties now have far higher COVID death rates. Misinformation is to blame". NPR. Archived from the original on 5 December 2021. Retrieved 5 December 2021.
  34. Zoumpourlis V, Goulielmaki M, Rizos E, Baliou S, Spandidos DA (October 2020). "[Comment] The COVID‑19 pandemic as a scientific and social challenge in the 21st century". Molecular Medicine Reports. 22 (4): 3035–3048. doi:10.3892/mmr.2020.11393. PMC 7453598. PMID 32945405. The genomic and bioinformatic analyses of the aforementioned studies, as well as the results of previous studies, confirm that the virus originated in bats and this way put an end to all conspiracy theories regarding this issue.
  35. ^ Maxmen A (June 2021). "Divisive COVID 'lab leak' debate prompts dire warnings from researchers". Nature. 594 (7861): 15–16. Bibcode:2021Natur.594...15M. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01383-3. PMID 34045757. S2CID 235232290.
  36. ^ Hakim MS (February 2021). "SARS-CoV-2, Covid-19, and the debunking of conspiracy theories". Reviews in Medical Virology (Review). 31 (6): e2222. doi:10.1002/rmv.2222. PMC 7995093. PMID 33586302. S2CID 231925928.
  37. Barh D, Silva Andrade B, Tiwari S, Giovanetti M, Góes-Neto A, Alcantara LC, et al. (September 2020). "Natural selection versus creation: a review on the origin of SARS-COV-2". Le Infezioni in Medicina (Review). 28 (3): 302–311. PMID 32920565.
  38. Osuchowski MF, Winkler MS, Skirecki T, Cajander S, Shankar-Hari M, Lachmann G, et al. (6 May 2021). "The COVID-19 puzzle: deciphering pathophysiology and phenotypes of a new disease entity". The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine. 9 (6): 622–642. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00218-6. ISSN 2213-2600. PMC 8102044. PMID 33965003. The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in a health crisis not witnessed since the 1918–19 Spanish influenza pandemic. The most plausible origin of SARS-CoV-2 is natural selection of the virus in an animal host followed by zoonotic transfer.
  39. ^ Frutos R, Gavotte L, Devaux CA (March 2021). "Understanding the origin of COVID-19 requires to change the paradigm on zoonotic emergence from the spillover model to the viral circulation model". Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 95: 104812. Bibcode:2021InfGE..9504812F. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104812. PMC 7969828. PMID 33744401.
  40. Bertrand N, Brown P, Williams KB, Cohen Z (16 July 2021). "Senior Biden officials finding that Covid lab leak theory as credible as natural origins explanation". CNN. Archived from the original on 17 July 2021. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
  41. Liu SL, Saif LJ, Weiss SR, Su L (2020). "No credible evidence supporting claims of the laboratory engineering of SARS-CoV-2". Emerging Microbes & Infections. 9 (1): 505–507. doi:10.1080/22221751.2020.1733440. PMC 7054935. PMID 32102621.
  42. Van Beusekom M (12 May 2020). "Scientists: 'Exactly zero' evidence COVID-19 came from a lab". Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. University of Minnesota. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 16 February 2021.
  43. ^ Kinetz E (20 April 2021). "Anatomy of a conspiracy: With COVID, China took leading role". AP NEWS. Archived from the original on 13 March 2021. Retrieved 15 February 2021.
  44. Nie JB (December 2020). "In the Shadow of Biological Warfare: Conspiracy Theories on the Origins of COVID-19 and Enhancing Global Governance of Biosafety as a Matter of Urgency". Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 17 (4): 567–574. doi:10.1007/s11673-020-10025-8. PMC 7445685. PMID 32840850.
  45. ^ Qin A, Wang V, Hakim D (20 November 2020). "How Steve Bannon and a Chinese Billionaire Created a Right-Wing Coronavirus Media Sensation". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 30 April 2021.
  46. ^ Elliott P. "How Distrust of Donald Trump Muddled the COVID-19 'Lab Leak' Debate". Time. Archived from the original on 4 June 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2021.
  47. Alba D (19 March 2021). "How Anti-Asian Activity Online Set the Stage for Real-World Violence". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 16 June 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2021.
  48. Mello MM, Greene JA, Sharfstein JM (August 2020). "Attacks on Public Health Officials During COVID-19". JAMA. 324 (8): 741–742. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.14423. PMID 32777019. S2CID 221099095.
  49. Izri T (27 October 2020). "Winnipeg epidemiologist faces online threats, as concerns about COVID-19 misinformation deepen". Winnipeg. Archived from the original on 27 April 2021. Retrieved 15 June 2021. Experts say the hostility against public health officials is being fueled in part by online conspiracy theories.
  50. Marcelo P (20 April 2021). "They were experts in viruses, and now in pitfalls of fame". AP News. Archived from the original on 4 February 2021. Retrieved 16 June 2021.
  51. Ryan J. "How the coronavirus origin story is being rewritten by a guerrilla Twitter group". CNET. Archived from the original on 16 June 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2021. Bostickson has dubbed him a "Chinese puppet," and others have erroneously suggested that Holmes, with researchers working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology including Shi Zhengli, conspired to keep the origins of the pandemic a secret. Holmes has blocked many Drastic members on Twitter because member's tweets have descended into personal attacks. He vehemently denies Bostickson's baseless claims.
  52. Fay Cortez M. "The Last–And Only–Foreign Scientist in the Wuhan Lab Speaks Out". www.bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on 3 July 2021. Retrieved 28 June 2021. One of a dozen experts appointed to an international taskforce in November to study the origins of the virus, Anderson hasn't sought public attention, especially since being targeted by U.S. extremists in early 2020 after she exposed false information about the pandemic posted online. The vitriol that ensued prompted her to file a police report. The threats of violence many coronavirus scientists have experienced over the past 18 months have made them hesitant to speak out because of the risk that their words will be misconstrued.
  53. Achenbach J (20 June 2021). "Scientists battle over the ultimate origin story: Where did the coronavirus come from?". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 22 June 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2021. Perlman, a mild-mannered, grandfatherly virologist at the University of Iowa, didn't know the author of the dyspeptic email and had nothing to do with the emergence of the coronavirus. But he had co-signed a letter to the Lancet in February 2020 saying SARS-CoV-2 was not a bioengineered virus and condemning 'conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.' 
  54. "Why scientists fear the "toxic" Covid-19 debate". www.newstatesman.com. Archived from the original on 19 April 2021. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
  55. Islam MS, Sarkar T, Khan SH, Mostofa Kamal AH, Hasan SM, Kabir A, et al. (October 2020). "COVID-19-Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis". The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 103 (4): 1621–1629. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812. PMC 7543839. PMID 32783794.
  56. Spinney L (18 June 2021). "In hunt for Covid's origin, new studies point away from lab leak theory". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
  57. Gorman J, Zimmer C (14 June 2021). "Scientist Opens Up About His Early Email to Fauci on Virus Origins". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
  58. Greenberg J (2 June 2021). "No, emails to Fauci don't show early agreement that virus was man-made". PolitiFact. Archived from the original on 12 June 2021. Retrieved 18 June 2021. The only email that came close to matching that claim noted that while some evidence suggested the virus might be man-made, more work was needed and that opinion could change. The email presented a possibility — a starting point for more research — not a conclusion. The man who wrote that email concluded that the virus developed naturally in a scientific journal article in March 2020.
  59. "Covid: White House defends Dr Fauci over lab leak emails". BBC News. 4 June 2021. Archived from the original on 14 June 2021. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
  60. Stolberg SG, Mueller B (11 July 2023). "Scientists, Under Fire From Republicans, Defend Fauci and Covid Origins Study". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 August 2023. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
  61. Jon C (11 July 2023). "Politicians, scientists spar over alleged NIH cover-up using COVID-19 origin paper". Science. doi:10.1126/science.adj7036. Archived from the original on 12 August 2023. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
  62. Ling J. "The Lab Leak Theory Doesn't Hold Up". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 1 July 2021. Retrieved 22 June 2021.
  63. ^ Gorski DH (31 May 2021). "The origin of SARS-CoV-2, revisited". Science-Based Medicine. Archived from the original on 1 June 2021. Retrieved 31 May 2021.
  64. Polidoro M (July–August 2020). "Stop the Epidemic of Lies! Thinking about COVID-19 Misinformation". Skeptical Inquirer. Vol. 44, no. 4. Amherst, New York: Center for Inquiry. pp. 15–16. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021.
  65. Brewster J. "A Timeline Of The COVID-19 Wuhan Lab Origin Theory". Forbes. Archived from the original on 17 February 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  66. Koyama T, Lauring A, Gallo RC, Reitz M (24 September 2020), "Reviews of "Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route"", Biological and Chemical Sciences, Rapid Reviews Infectious Diseases, Rapid Reviews: Covid-19, MIT Press, ISSN 2692-4072, archived from the original on 8 October 2020
  67. Reitz M (4 October 2020). "Review 4: "Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route"". Rapid Reviews: COVID-19. Archived from the original on 10 October 2020. Retrieved 8 May 2021.
  68. ^ Manavis S (22 April 2020). "How US conspiracy theorists are targeting local government in the UK". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 29 April 2020. Retrieved 21 January 2021.
  69. "Viral video promotes the unsupported hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 is a bioengineered virus released from a Wuhan research laboratory". Health Feedback. 17 April 2020. Archived from the original on 3 February 2021. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
  70. ^ Bellemare A, Ho J, Nicholson K (29 April 2020). "Some Canadians who received unsolicited copy of Epoch Times upset by claim that China was behind virus". CBC News. Archived from the original on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  71. "Anti-communist organisation descends on Wagga to spread publication". www.msn.com. Archived from the original on 2 March 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2020.
  72. Eli Clifton (26 May 2020). "This NBC executive became a conspiracy king and a pro-Trump media boss". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on 5 August 2021. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
  73. Davidson H (20 January 2021). "China revives conspiracy theory of US army link to Covid". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 March 2021. Retrieved 17 February 2021.
  74. ^ Doak S (14 March 2023). "False: COVID-19 originated at Fort Detrick, a United States army base". Logically. Archived from the original on 4 February 2024. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  75. Rasmussen AL (January 2021). "On the origins of SARS-CoV-2". Nature Medicine. 27 (1): 9. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01205-5. PMID 33442004.
  76. ^ Robertson L (21 May 2021). "The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement". FactCheck.org. Archived from the original on 8 June 2021. Retrieved 4 June 2021.
  77. ^ Bryant CC (25 June 2021). "How risky is 'gain of function' research? Congress scrutinizes China". The Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on 6 July 2021. Retrieved 4 July 2021.
  78. ^ Dapcevich M (20 May 2021). "Did Fauci Fund 'Gain of Function' Research, Thereby Causing COVID-19 Pandemic?". Snopes. Archived from the original on 8 July 2021. Retrieved 4 July 2021.
  79. ^ Kessler G (18 May 2021). "Analysis | Fact-checking the Paul-Fauci flap over Wuhan lab funding". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 6 July 2021. Retrieved 4 July 2021.
  80. Kessler G (21 October 2021). "Analysis | The repeated claim that Fauci lied to Congress about 'gain-of-function' research". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 7 March 2022. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
  81. Kessler G (1 January 2017). "About The Fact Checker". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 6 March 2019. Retrieved 13 July 2021.
  82. "WHO-convened global study of origins of SARS-CoV-2: China Part". World Health Organization. Archived from the original on 19 May 2021. Retrieved 21 May 2021. WHO gratefully acknowledges the work of the joint team, including Chinese and international scientists and WHO experts who worked on the technical sections of this report, and those who worked on studies to prepare data and information for the joint mission.
  83. Mallapaty S (1 April 2021). "After the WHO report: what's next in the search for COVID's origins". Nature. 592 (7854): 337–338. Bibcode:2021Natur.592..337M. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00877-4. PMID 33790440. S2CID 232481786.
  84. Huang Y (8 April 2021). "What the WHO Investigation Reveals About the Origins of COVID-19". Archived from the original on 3 June 2021. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
  85. "WHO Director-General's remarks at the Member State Briefing on the report of the international team studying the origins of SARS-CoV-2". World Health Organization. Archived from the original on 25 April 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  86. Pezenik S. "Criticism of WHO Wuhan report exposes limits of agency's power and influence". ABC News. Archived from the original on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2021.
  87. Gan N (31 March 2021). "14 countries and WHO chief accuse China of withholding data from coronavirus investigation". CNN. Archived from the original on 3 June 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2021.
  88. Hernández JC, Gorman J (29 March 2021). "Virus Origins Remain Unclear in W.H.O.-China Inquiry". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2021.
  89. Brumfiel G (28 May 2021). "Many Scientists Still Think The Coronavirus Came From Nature". NPR. Archived from the original on 7 June 2021. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
  90. ^ Swanson I (25 May 2021). "The Memo: Media face hard questions on Trump, Wuhan lab". The Hill. Archived from the original on 3 June 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  91. See, for example, the following:
  92. "Nature-based or lab leak? Unraveling the debate over the origins of COVID-19". ABC News. Archived from the original on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 16 June 2021. Political voices in favor of the lab-leak theory, particularly from President Donald Trump, served to polarize the issue further and largely pushed the scientific community away from a willingness to consider the lab-leak theory.
  93. Chow D (16 June 2021). "There's still no evidence of a Chinese lab leak. But here's what's changed, scientists say". NBC News. Archived from the original on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 17 June 2021. Chan said there had been trepidation among some scientists about publicly discussing the lab leak hypothesis for fear that their words could be misconstrued or used to support racist rhetoric about how the coronavirus emerged.
  94. ^ Yates K, Pauls J. "Online claims that Chinese scientists stole coronavirus from Winnipeg lab have 'no factual basis'". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Event occurs at 27 January 2020. Archived from the original on 8 February 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  95. ^ Pauls K (14 July 2019). "Chinese researcher escorted from infectious disease lab amid RCMP investigation". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 18 March 2020.
  96. Broderick R (31 January 2020). "A Pro-Trump Blog Doxed A Chinese Scientist It Falsely Accused Of Creating The Coronavirus As A Bioweapon". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on 10 February 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  97. Yates K, Pauls J. "Chinese scientists have stolen the coronavirus from the Winnipeg laboratory and the online rumors are'unfounded' Chinese translation: 中国科学家从温尼伯实验室中窃取 冠状病毒的网络传言'没有事实根据'". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Event occurs at 27 January 2020. Archived from the original on 1 February 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  98. Spencer SH (28 January 2020). "Coronavirus Wasn't Sent by 'Spy' From Canada". Factcheck.org. Archived from the original on 30 January 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  99. Shoham D (29 January 2020). "China and Viruses: The Case of Dr. Xiangguo Qiu". Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. Archived from the original on 21 March 2020. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  100. "China's rulers see the coronavirus as a chance to tighten their grip". The Economist. 8 February 2020. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
  101. Kao J, Li MS (26 March 2020). "How China Built a Twitter Propaganda Machine Then Let It Loose on Coronavirus". ProPublica. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  102. Dodds L (5 April 2020). "China floods Facebook with undeclared coronavirus propaganda ads blaming Trump". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
  103. Liu D, Shi A, Smith A (6 March 2020). "Coronavirus rumors – and misinformation – swirl unchecked in China". NBC News. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  104. 中國家長指稱「武漢肺炎是美國投放病毒」 網友傻爆眼 [Chinese parents claim that "Wuhan pneumonia is a virus delivered by the United States" netizens are stupid] (in Chinese (China)). Archived from the original on 19 February 2020.
  105. 武汉病毒4个关键蛋白被替换,可精准攻击华人 [Four key proteins of Wuhan virus have been replaced, which can accurately attack Chinese]. 西陆网 (in Chinese (China)). Archived from the original on 11 February 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2020.
  106. Riechmann D (12 March 2020). "Trump officials emphasize that coronavirus 'Made in China'". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
  107. ^ "【錯誤】網傳「代表中國解放軍最高權力機構中央軍事委員會的網站『西陸戰略』發表一篇文章,改口承認(武漢)病毒是人工合成」?" [Misinformation alert, rumor that top PLA website Xilu admitted virus is bio-engineered]. Taiwan Fact Checking Organization (in Chinese). 13 February 2020. Archived from the original on 17 February 2020. Retrieved 10 May 2020.
  108. 为什么武汉这场瘟疫,必须得靠解放军? [Why does Wuhan have to rely on the PLA?] (in Chinese (China)). 红歌会网. Archived from the original on 21 February 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2020.
  109. Cheng CT (13 March 2020). "China's foreign ministry accuses US military of bringing virus to Wuhan". Taiwan News. Archived from the original on 23 March 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2020.
  110. Budryk Z (12 March 2020). "China, pushing conspiracy theory, accuses US Army of bringing coronavirus to Wuhan". The Hill. Archived from the original on 20 March 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2020.
  111. Tang D. "China accuses US of bringing coronavirus to Wuhan". The Times. Archived from the original on 20 March 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2020.
  112. Westcott B, Jiang S (14 March 2020). "Chinese diplomat promotes coronavirus conspiracy theory". CNN. Archived from the original on 18 March 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  113. "US summons China's ambassador to Washington over coronavirus conspiracy theory". Al Arabiya English. 14 March 2020. Archived from the original on 16 March 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2020.
  114. O'Sullivan D (27 April 2020). "Exclusive: She's been falsely accused of starting the pandemic. Her life has been turned upside down". CNN. Archived from the original on 27 April 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  115. Vallejo J (28 April 2020). "'It's like waking up from a bad dream': Coronavirus 'patient zero' conspiracy target breaks silence". The Independent. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  116. "Chinese diplomat promotes conspiracy theory that US military brought virus to Wuhan – CNN". CNN. 18 March 2020. Archived from the original on 18 March 2020. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
  117. Houston M (17 May 2020). "More athletes claim they contracted COVID-19 at Military World Games in Wuhan". www.insidethegames.biz. Archived from the original on 15 June 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  118. O'Sullivan D, Naik R, General J, Fulbright H (27 April 2020). "Exclusive: She's been falsely accused of starting the pandemic. Her life has been turned upside down". CNN. Archived from the original on 27 April 2020. Retrieved 21 June 2021. A US Army reservist and mother of two, has become the target of conspiracy theorists who falsely place her at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, saying that she brought the disease to China.
  119. Li J (20 January 2021). "China's gift for the Biden inauguration is a conspiracy theory about Covid-19's US origins". Quartz. Archived from the original on 20 February 2021. Retrieved 21 January 2021.
  120. Davidson H (20 January 2021). "China revives conspiracy theory of US army link to Covid". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 March 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
  121. Ramzy A, Chien AC (25 August 2021). "Rejecting Covid Inquiry, China Peddles Conspiracy Theories Blaming the U.S." The New York Times. Archived from the original on 30 August 2021. Retrieved 26 August 2021.
  122. Schafer B (9 July 2021). "China Fires Back at Biden With Conspiracy Theories About Maryland Lab". Archived from the original on 27 July 2021. Retrieved 11 July 2021.
  123. ^ Glenza J (22 February 2020). "Coronavirus: US says Russia behind disinformation campaign". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 25 February 2020. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
  124. "Coronavirus: Russia pushing fake news about US using outbreak to 'wage economic war' on China, officials say". South China Morning Post. Agence France-Presse. 23 February 2020. Archived from the original on 23 February 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
  125. Ng K (23 February 2020). "US accuses Russia of huge coronavirus disinformation campaign". The Independent. Archived from the original on 24 February 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
  126. "Coronavirus: Russia denies spreading US conspiracy on social media". BBC. 23 February 2020. Archived from the original on 25 February 2020. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
  127. ^ Episkopos M (7 February 2020). "Some in Russia Think the Coronavirus Is a U.S. Biological Weapon". The National Interest. Archived from the original on 23 February 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
  128. "Russia deploying coronavirus disinformation to sow panic in West, EU document says". Reuters. 18 March 2020. Archived from the original on 19 March 2020.
  129. "'Russophobic': Kremlin Denies Evidence of Russian COVID-19 Disinformation Campaign". polygraph.info. 19 March 2020. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  130. "Sputnik: Coronavirus Could be Designed to Kill Elderly Italians". EU vs Disinformation. 25 March 2020. Archived from the original on 21 April 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2020.
  131. Chappell B, Yousef O (25 March 2022). "How the false Russian biolab story came to circulate among the U.S. far right". NPR. Archived from the original on 25 March 2022. Retrieved 25 March 2022.
  132. Teh C (25 March 2022). "Social-media users in China are obsessing over a conspiracy theory claiming the COVID-19 virus was produced by US-linked laboratories in Ukraine". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 25 March 2022. Retrieved 25 March 2022.
  133. ^ "Arab Writers: The Coronavirus Is Part Of Biological Warfare Waged By The U.S. Against China". Middle East Media Research Institute. 6 February 2020. Archived from the original on 9 February 2020. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
  134. "New Report Notes Rise In Coronavirus-Linked Anti-Semitic Hate Speech". NPR. 21 April 2020. Archived from the original on 7 September 2021. Retrieved 27 September 2021.
  135. "Coronavirus: Why conspiracy theories have taken root in Turkey". Middle East Eye. April 2020. Archived from the original on 26 February 2021. Retrieved 27 September 2021.
  136. "Global survey shows Greeks trust government on pandemic, believe conspiracy theories". Kathimerini. October 2020. Archived from the original on 27 September 2021. Retrieved 27 September 2021.
  137. ^ "Iran Cleric Blames Trump For Coronavirus Outbreak in Religious City". Radio Farda. 22 February 2020. Archived from the original on 23 February 2020. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  138. ^ Fazeli Y (14 March 2020). "Coronavirus: Iran's deputy health minister rejects biological warfare theory". Al Arabiya English. Archived from the original on 17 March 2020.
  139. "Coronavirus: Misinformation and false medical advice spreads in Iran". BBC News. 29 February 2020. Archived from the original on 1 March 2020. Retrieved 1 March 2020.
  140. "Civil Defense Chief: Coronavirus Likely Biological Attack against China, Iran". Fars News Agency. 3 March 2020. Archived from the original on 4 March 2020. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
  141. "Virus is biological attack on China and Iran, Iranian civil defense chief claims". The Times of Israel. 4 March 2020. Archived from the original on 5 March 2020. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
  142. Fazeli Y (5 March 2020). "Coronavirus may be US 'biological attack': IRGC head Hossein Salami". Al Arabiya English. Archived from the original on 6 March 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
  143. Ghanatir H (16 March 2020). "The Lie that Triggered Khamenei's 'Biological Attack' Conspiracy Theory". IranWire. Archived from the original on 15 March 2021. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  144. Halaschak Z (9 March 2020). "'Biologic war': Former Iranian president says coronavirus was 'produced in laboratories'". Washington Examiner. Archived from the original on 11 March 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  145. "Prophet's perfume and flower oil: how Islamic medicine has made Iran's Covid-19 outbreak worse". The France 24 Observers. Archived from the original on 9 April 2020. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
  146. "Senior Iranian cleric who died from coronavirus blamed US for outbreak" (video). Al Arabiya English. 19 March 2020. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 22 March 2020.
  147. Andrew Whiskeyman, Michael Berger (25 February 2021). "Axis of Disinformation: Propaganda from Iran, Russia, and China on COVID-19". The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Archived from the original on 5 June 2021.
  148. Rubio M (3 March 2020). "Marco Rubio: Russia, China and Iran are waging disinformation war over coronavirus". New York Post. Archived from the original on 4 March 2020. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
  149. San Juan R (4 February 2020). "Bioweapon conspiracy video creeps into Senate coronavirus hearing". The Philippine Star. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
  150. "Constituyente Elvis Méndez: "El coronavirus lo inocularon los gringos"" [Constituent Elvis Méndez: "The coronavirus was inoculated by the gringos"]. Somos Tu Voz (in Spanish). 7 March 2020. Archived from the original on 18 March 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2020.
  151. Fisher M (8 April 2020). "Why Coronavirus Conspiracy Theories Flourish. And Why It Matters". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 17 April 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  152. Ali I (9 September 2020). "Impacts of Rumors and Conspiracy Theories Surrounding COVID-19 on Preparedness Programs". Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 16 (1). University of Vienna: 310–315. doi:10.1017/dmp.2020.325. ISSN 1935-7893. PMC 7596562. PMID 32900413.
  153. "GLOBSEC Trends 2020" (PDF). Globsec. p. 18. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 February 2021.
  154. "Diminishing Trust and Vaccination: Conspiracies and Lies". Balkan Insight. 14 April 2021. Archived from the original on 26 April 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2022.
  155. Frantzman S (8 March 2020). "Iran's regime pushes antisemitic conspiracies about coronavirus". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  156. "Arab media accuse US, Israel of coronavirus conspiracy against China". The Jerusalem Post. 9 February 2020. Archived from the original on 1 March 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  157. Connelly I (12 March 2020). "Online anti-Semitism thrives around coronavirus, even on mainstream platforms". The Forward. Archived from the original on 21 March 2020. Retrieved 21 March 2020.
  158. Cortellessa E (14 March 2020). "Conspiracy theory that Jews created virus spreads on social media, ADL says". The Times of Israel. Archived from the original on 14 March 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2020.
  159. "Coronavirus is a Zionist plot, say Turkish politicians, media, public". The Jerusalem Post. 18 March 2020. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 27 September 2021.
  160. Joffre T (16 March 2020). "Iranian cleric denies approving use of coronavirus vaccine from Israel". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2020.
  161. "Would a Zionist coronavirus cure be Halal? Iranian cleric says yes". The Jerusalem Post. 15 March 2020. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2020.
  162. Edmunds DR (18 March 2020). "Coronavirus is a Zionist plot, say Turkish politicians, media, public". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2020.
  163. Margolin J (23 March 2020). "White supremacists encouraging their members to spread coronavirus to cops, Jews, FBI says". ABC News. Archived from the original on 24 March 2020. Retrieved 25 March 2020.
  164. Baur, Joe. "Anti-Semetic Flyer in German Tram Blames Jews for COVID Pandemic." South Florida Sun Sentinel: Jewish Journal section. 17 February 2021. Link to article Archived 18 September 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
  165. "Germany kidnap plot: Gang planned to overthrow democracy". BBC News Online. 14 April 2022. Archived from the original on 7 December 2022. Retrieved 7 December 2022.
  166. Mahmood B (22 May 2020). "One Fifth of English People in Study Blame Jews or Muslims for COVID-19". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 3 February 2022. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
  167. Tercatin R, Edmunds DR. "One in five English people believe COVID is a Jewish conspiracy – survey". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 2 February 2022. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
  168. Da Silva C (3 April 2020). "India's Coronavirus Outbreak Stokes Islamophobia as Muslims blamed for spreading infection". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 11 March 2021. Retrieved 6 April 2020.
  169. Datta PP (6 April 2020). "Coronavirus outbreak sparks racist attacks on people from North East, stokes Islamophobia on social media". Firstpost. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 6 April 2020.
  170. Jha N (3 April 2020). "A Cluster Of Coronavirus Cases Can Be Traced Back to a Single Mosque And Now 200 Million Muslims Are Being Vilified". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 6 April 2020.
  171. Jha P (28 March 2020). "No, foreign nationals from Italy, Iran weren't hiding in Patna mosque to avoid coronavirus testing". Firstpost. Archived from the original on 15 March 2021. Retrieved 6 April 2020.
  172. Parveen N (5 April 2020). "Police investigate UK far-right groups over anti-Muslim coronavirus claims". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 6 April 2020.
  173. Broderick R (23 January 2020). "QAnon Supporters And Anti-Vaxxers Are Spreading A Hoax That Bill Gates Created The Coronavirus". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on 30 January 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  174. Goodman J (19 June 2020). "Bill Gates and the lab targeted by conspiracy theorists-GB". BBC News. Archived from the original on 17 February 2021. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
  175. Gregory A (1 September 2020). "You are dangerous': Piers Corbyn confronted on air by Dr Hilary after £10,000 fine for anti-lockdown protest". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2 October 2020. Retrieved 15 December 2020.
  176. Langguth J, Filkuková P, Brenner S, Schroeder DT, Pogorelov K (27 May 2022). "COVID-19 and 5G conspiracy theories: long term observation of a digital wildfire". International Journal of Data Science and Analytics. 15 (3): 329–346. doi:10.1007/s41060-022-00322-3. PMC 9137448. PMID 35669096.
  177. ^ Wynne K (19 March 2020). "Youtube Video Suggests 5G Internet Causes Coronavirus and People Are Falling For It". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 20 March 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  178. ^ Nicholson K, Ho J, Yates J (23 March 2020). "Viral video claiming 5G caused pandemic easily debunked". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on 26 March 2020. Retrieved 26 March 2020.
  179. Satariano A, Alba D (10 April 2020). "Burning Cell Towers, Out of Baseless Fear They Spread the Virus". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 5 March 2021. Retrieved 14 April 2020.
  180. Gallagher R (9 April 2020). "5G Virus Conspiracy Theory Fueled by Coordinated Effort". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  181. "False claim: 5G networks are making people sick, not Coronavirus". Reuters. 17 March 2020. Archived from the original on 20 March 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  182. O'Donnell B (21 March 2020). "Here's why 5G and coronavirus are not connected". USA Today. Archived from the original on 21 March 2020. Retrieved 22 March 2020.
  183. Krishna R (13 March 2020). "These claims about the new coronavirus and 5G are unfounded". Full Fact. Archived from the original on 20 March 2020. Retrieved 22 March 2020.
  184. Finley T (16 March 2020). "No, Keri Hilson, 5G Did Not Cause Coronavirus". HuffPost. Archived from the original on 19 March 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  185. Large ML (8 April 2020). "My Dad Got Hoaxed By the Anti-5G Conspiracy Movement". VICE. Archived from the original on 19 September 2020. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
  186. Ellis R, Kennedy D (12 September 2020). "Kate Shemirani: antivax leader is banned nurse who fears 5G network". The Times. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
  187. Hoffman N (2 June 2021). "Anti-vaxx nurse who called NHS 'the new Auschwitz' is struck off". The Jewish Chronicle. Archived from the original on 3 June 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  188. ^ "Mast fires surge in the UK over Easter weekend amid 5G-coronavirus conspiracy theories". Irish Examiner. Press Association. 14 April 2020. Archived from the original on 6 May 2020. Retrieved 14 April 2020.
  189. ^ "Myth busters". World Health Organization.
  190. "Coronavirus: 'Murder threats' to telecoms engineers over 5G". BBC News. 23 April 2020. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
  191. ^ Maguire S (13 April 2020). "Gardaí suspect fires at 5G masts were deliberate after coal found". TheJournal.ie. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 14 April 2020.
  192. Faulconbridge G, Holton K (4 April 2020). "5G coronavirus conspiracy theory is dangerous fake nonsense, UK says". Reuters Technology New. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 4 April 2020.
  193. ^ Hern A (5 April 2020). "YouTube moves to limit spread of false coronavirus 5G theory". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
  194. Seal T (6 April 2020). "5G-coronavirus conspiracy theory spurs rash of telecom tower arson fires". Fortune. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  195. ^ Waterson J, Hern A (6 April 2020). "At least 20 UK phone masts vandalised over false 5G coronavirus claims". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  196. "Brand bij vier zendmasten: 'Heel sterk vermoeden van brandstichting'" [Fire at four transmission towers: 'Very strong suspicion of arson']. Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 10 April 2020. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  197. "Extra beveiliging bij zendmasten na brandstichting" [Extra security at cell towers after arson]. Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 29 May 2020. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
  198. Fildes N, Di Stefano M, Murphy H (16 April 2020). "How a 5G coronavirus conspiracy spread across Europe". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 13 December 2020. Retrieved 16 April 2020.
  199. ^ Waterson J (3 April 2020). "Broadband engineers threatened due to 5G coronavirus conspiracies". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
  200. Allington D, Duffy B, Wessely S, Dhavan N, Rubin J (June 2020). "Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency". Psychological Medicine. 51 (10): 1763–1769. doi:10.1017/S003329172000224X. PMC 7298098. PMID 32513320. S2CID 219550692.
  201. Kelion L (7 April 2020). "Coronavirus: YouTube tightens rules after David Icke 5G interview". BBC News. Archived from the original on 31 December 2020. Retrieved 12 June 2020.
  202. Hruska J (6 April 2020). "YouTube Says It Will Remove 5G Misinformation After People Burn Cell Towers". Extremetech. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  203. "Covid-related misinformation on YouTube: The spread of misinformation videos on social media and the effectiveness of platform policies". Computational Propaganda Project. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 1 November 2020.
  204. ^ "Coronavirus: Ofcom rules on Eamonn Holmes and David Icke comments". BBC News. 20 April 2020. Archived from the original on 12 March 2021. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  205. ^ Waterson J (24 April 2020). "Revealed: former Vodafone executive in 5G conspiracy video is UK pastor". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 24 April 2020. Retrieved 24 April 2020.
  206. Rahman G (6 April 2020). "£20 notes don't have a secret message about 5G and coronavirus". Full Fact. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  207. "The new £20 note". The Bank of England. Archived from the original on 8 September 2023. Retrieved 10 April 2020.
  208. "New £20 note to feature Margate's Turner Contemporary". Turner Contemporary. Archived from the original on 27 February 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2020.
  209. "False headline claim: Harvard Professor arrested for creating and selling the new coronavirus to China". Reuters. 7 April 2020. Archived from the original on 5 February 2021. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
  210. "Fact-check: Did US researcher make and sell Covid-19 to China?". Deccan Herald. 11 August 2020. Archived from the original on 13 February 2021. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
  211. ^ "Wild theory suggests COVID-19 came to Earth aboard a space rock". Astronomy.com. 31 August 2020. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2021.
  212. Margolin J, Meek JG (9 April 2020). "Intelligence report warned of coronavirus crisis as early as November: Sources". ABC News. Archived from the original on 25 April 2020. Retrieved 29 June 2021.
  213. Casiano L, Griffin J (8 April 2020). "Defense official says media reports about November coronavirus intel assessment are false". Fox News. Archived from the original on 3 May 2021. Retrieved 29 June 2021.
  214. ^ "Fact check: Inventor of method used to test for COVID-19 didn't say it can't be used in virus detection". Reuters. 13 November 2020. Archived from the original on 31 July 2021. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  215. ^ "PCR inventor – who died in 2019 – did not say his test won't work for COVID-19 infections". Australian Associated Press. 22 July 2020. Archived from the original on 10 July 2021. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  216. ^ "The inventor of PCR never said it wasn't designed to detect infectious diseases". Full Fact. 23 October 2020. Archived from the original on 13 July 2021. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  217. "FALSE: A video that claims that PCR tests find 'anything' and are not used to detect the new coronavirus". Poynter Institute. 9 July 2021. Archived from the original on 11 July 2021. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  218. "Hoax circulates online that Switzerland has 'officially confirmed' coronavirus tests are 'fake'". AFP Fact Check. Agence France-Presse. 8 September 2020. Archived from the original on 21 April 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
  219. "Passengers who use fake COVID-19 test results could face P50k fine, jail: PAL". ABS-CBN News. 12 April 2021. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
  220. ^ Evon D (3 January 2020). "Are People Collapsing in the Street from Coronavirus?". Snopes. Archived from the original on 23 August 2022. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
  221. Tardáguila C (30 January 2020). "Photos and videos allegedly showing the coronavirus are now challenging fact-checkers". Poynter. Archived from the original on 26 August 2022. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
  222. Lajka A (21 February 2020). "Video falsely claims to show bodies of virus victims in China". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 23 August 2022. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
  223. "False claim: Picture shows people dying of coronavirus in the streets". Reuters. 27 March 2020. Archived from the original on 23 August 2022. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
  224. ^ Kliff S (13 July 2020). "Bottleneck for U.S. Coronavirus Response: The Fax Machine Before public health officials can manage the pandemic, they must deal with a broken data system that sends incomplete results in formats they can't easily use". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2020.
  225. Walsh NP. "The Wuhan Files". CNN. Archived from the original on 11 March 2021. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  226. Sherwell P (6 December 2020). "Leak exposes how Beijing ordered under‑reporting of Wuhan coronavirus cases". The Times. Archived from the original on 26 February 2021. Retrieved 14 December 2020.
  227. Luo P, Liao Y (30 January 2020). "泛科學:關於新冠肺炎的20個傳言,哪些是真哪些是假?" [Pan Science: 20 rumors about new coronary pneumonia, which are true and which are false?]. Theinitium.com (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2 February 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
  228. ^ Ghaffary S (31 January 2020). "Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube struggle with coronavirus hoaxes". Vox. Archived from the original on 8 February 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2020.
  229. "武汉肺炎:随疫情扩散全球的五大假新闻" [The misinformation that gone viral with the virus]. BBC China (in Chinese). 29 January 2020. Archived from the original on 29 January 2020. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  230. Schelden P (6 February 2020). "Are These the 'Real' Wuhan Coronavirus Statistics? – MedicineNet Health News". MedicineNet. Archived from the original on 21 April 2021. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
  231. ^ Hioe B, Wooster L (12 February 2020). "Taiwan News Publishes COVID-19 Misinformation as Epidemic Spreads". New Bloom Magazine. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
  232. "These aren't satellite images and they don't show evidence of mass cremations in Wuhan". FullFact. 13 February 2020. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  233. Kasprak A (24 February 2020). "Do Sulfur Emissions from Wuhan, China, Point to Mass Cremation of Coronavirus Victims?". Snopes. Archived from the original on 15 March 2021. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  234. ^ "This map is a forecast based on past data, not real-time satellite readings". AFP Fact Check. 20 February 2020. Archived from the original on 23 February 2020. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  235. ^ Lajka A (30 March 2020). "Drop in cellphone users in China wrongly attributed to coronavirus deaths". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  236. Tahir D (28 May 2020). "Bad state data hides coronavirus threat as Trump pushes reopening". MSN. Archived from the original on 31 October 2020. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  237. Vestal C (4 August 2020). "Bad data is bogging down the COVID-19 fight; US 'needs to change,' experts say". USA Today. Archived from the original on 29 October 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2020.
  238. Piller C (16 July 2020). "Data secrecy is crippling attempts to slow COVID-19's spread in U.S., epidemiologists warn". Science Magazine. Archived from the original on 17 June 2022. Retrieved 29 June 2022.
  239. Appleby J, Knight V (2 November 2020). "How COVID Death Counts Become the Stuff of Conspiracy Theories". Kaiser Health News. Archived from the original on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
  240. Aschwanden C (20 October 2020). "Debunking the False Claim That COVID Death Counts Are Inflated". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 28 October 2020. Retrieved 31 October 2020.
  241. Spencer SH (1 September 2020). "CDC Did Not 'Admit Only 6%' of Recorded Deaths from COVID-19". FactCheck.org. Archived from the original on 13 March 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2020.
  242. Bump P (10 January 2022). "Yes, hundreds of thousands of people have died of covid-19". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 30 January 2022.
  243. "Genevieve Briand". Johns Hopkins Advanced Academic Programs. Archived from the original on 10 November 2021. Retrieved 30 January 2022.
  244. ^ "A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19". The Johns Hopkins News-Letter. Archived from the original on 26 November 2020. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  245. Dowd K (4 December 2020). "Major problems with viral story about Johns Hopkins 'study' on COVID-19 deaths". SFGATE. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 1 July 2021.
  246. Fichera A (3 December 2020). "Flawed Analysis Leads to False Claim of 'No Excess Deaths' in 2020". FactCheck.org. Archived from the original on 11 June 2021. Retrieved 1 July 2021.
  247. ^ Teoh F (30 November 2020). "More deaths occurred in 2020 than in previous years; Johns Hopkins student article compared proportion of deaths per age group, which can obscure changes in raw numbers". Health Feedback. Archived from the original on 3 September 2021. Retrieved 30 January 2022.
  248. "Did Johns Hopkins Student Newspaper Retract Article Claiming COVID-19 Deaths 'Not Above Normal'?". Snopes.com. 2 December 2020. Archived from the original on 4 July 2021. Retrieved 1 July 2021.
  249. 武漢肺炎疫情謠言多 事實查核中心指3大共同點 [There are many rumors about the Wuhan pneumonia epidemic, the fact-checking center points to 3 common points] (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Central News Agency. 26 February 2020. Archived from the original on 11 March 2020. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
  250. "Virus Outbreak: Chinese trolls decried for fake news". Taipei Times. 28 February 2020. Archived from the original on 1 March 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2020.
  251. "Taiwan accuses China of waging cyber 'war' to disrupt virus fight". Reuters. 29 February 2020. Archived from the original on 1 March 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2020.
  252. Lee Y, Blanchard B (3 March 2020). "'Provocative' China pressures Taiwan with fighters, fake news amid virus outbreak". Reuters. Archived from the original on 5 March 2020. Retrieved 5 March 2020. 'We have been told to track if the origins are linked to instructions given by the Communist Party, using all possible means,' the official said, adding that authorities had increased scrutiny on online platforms, including chat rooms.
  253. Fifield A. "Russia's disinformation campaign in the U.S. has nothing on China's efforts in Taiwan". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 1 March 2023. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
  254. "With Odds Against It, Taiwan Keeps Coronavirus Corralled". NPR. 13 March 2020. Archived from the original on 21 March 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  255. "One-fourth of coronavirus misinformation in Taiwan comes from Chinese trolls: CIB". Taiwan News. 25 March 2020. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  256. Yun-yu C, Mazzetta M (27 March 2020). "AIT partners with local group to combat COVID-19 disinformation". Focus Taiwan. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  257. ^ "Coronavirus: How a misleading map went global". BBC News. 19 February 2020. Archived from the original on 19 February 2020. Retrieved 19 February 2020.
  258. ^ Gorski DH (23 November 2020). "There is no COVID-19 'casedemic.' The pandemic is real and deadly". Science-Based Medicine. Archived from the original on 5 February 2021. Retrieved 2 December 2020.
  259. Douthat R (20 October 2020). "Opinion | Trump Is Giving Up". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 21 October 2020. Retrieved 21 October 2020.
  260. "FBD changes wording of business insurance policies amid fight over virus payouts". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 22 October 2020. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
  261. Gurney M (30 September 2020). "Ontario has drawn its COVID-19 red line. What now?". TVO.org. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
  262. "Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) – Transmission". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 28 October 2020. Archived from the original on 19 September 2020. Retrieved 19 January 2021.
  263. ^ Hu JC (10 April 2020). "No, You Did Not Get COVID-19 in the Fall of 2019". Slate. Archived from the original on 28 February 2021. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  264. ^ Rana P (25 April 2020). "Has Coronavirus Been in California Since the Fall? Researchers Investigate". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
  265. Hanson VC (31 March 2020). "Coronavirus: The California Herd". National Review. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  266. St John P (11 April 2020). "New signs suggest coronavirus was in California far earlier than anyone knew". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  267. Thomas L (14 April 2020). "California COVID-19 herd immunity theory debunked". News Medical. Archived from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
  268. Moench M (11 April 2020). "Unlikely that California has 'herd immunity' to the coronavirus". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
  269. Vallejo J (27 April 2020). "'It's like waking up from a bad dream': Coronavirus 'patient zero' conspiracy target breaks silence". The Independent. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
  270. O'Sullivan D (27 April 2020). "Exclusive: She's been falsely accused of starting the pandemic. Her life has been turned upside down". CNN Business. Archived from the original on 27 April 2020. Retrieved 20 May 2020.
  271. ^ Lauer E. "Meet the QUT professor who figured out Covid-19 was airborne". Campus Review. Archived from the original on 23 May 2023. Retrieved 29 October 2023.
  272. "Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions". www.who.int. Archived from the original on 9 July 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2023.
  273. Grover N. "Two years of COVID: The battle to accept airborne transmission". www.aljazeera.com. Archived from the original on 30 October 2023. Retrieved 30 October 2023.
  274. Molteni M (21 May 2021). "The 60-Year-Old Scientific Screwup That Helped Covid Kill". Wired. Archived from the original on 22 May 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2023.
  275. World Health Organization (28 March 2020). "FACT: #COVID19 is NOT airborne". X (formerly Twitter). Archived from the original on 28 October 2023. Retrieved 29 October 2023.
  276. ^ Mandavilli A (4 July 2020). "239 Experts With One Big Claim: The Coronavirus Is Airborne". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 November 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2023.
  277. Ahmed N (23 July 2021). "'World Health Organisation Doomed the World by Concealing Evidence of Airborne COVID Transmission'". Byline Times. Archived from the original on 29 October 2023. Retrieved 29 October 2023.
  278. Thompson D (13 April 2021). "Deep Cleaning Isn't a Victimless Crime". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  279. ^ "SARS-CoV-2 and Surface (Fomite) Transmission for Indoor Community Environments". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 5 April 2021. Archived from the original on 5 April 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  280. Faivre Le Cadre AS (12 February 2020). "Black people aren't more resistant to novel coronavirus". AFP Fact Check. Archived from the original on 16 February 2020. Retrieved 16 February 2020.
  281. Alberti M, Feleke B (13 March 2020). "Minister rejects false rumors that 'those with black skin cannot get coronavirus' as Kenya records first case". CNN. Archived from the original on 19 March 2020. Retrieved 15 March 2020.
  282. Poston B, Barboza T, Jennings A (7 April 2020). "L.A. releases first racial breakdown of coronavirus fatalities; blacks have higher death rate". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 13 March 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2020.
  283. Berry DB (7 April 2020). "Black people dying from coronavirus at much higher rates in cities across the USA". USA Today. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2020.
  284. Ghosh A (15 March 2020). "Vegetarian food, Indian immunity won't prevent Covid-19, says Anand Krishnan". The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  285. "Coronavirus: Iran's leader suggests US cooked up 'special version' of virus to target country". The Independent. 22 March 2020. Archived from the original on 24 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  286. "Iran's Khamanei refuses US help to fight coronavirus, citing conspiracy theory". France 24. 22 March 2020. Archived from the original on 14 April 2020. Retrieved 4 April 2020.
  287. "Jordanian scientists claim Arabs less likely to contract coronavirus". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 9 December 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  288. Zhou N (17 April 2020). "Survey of Covid-19 racism against Asian Australians records 178 incidents in two weeks". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  289. Tavernise S, Oppel Jr RA (23 March 2020). "Spit On, Yelled At, Attacked: Chinese-Americans Fear for Their Safety". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 19 May 2020. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
  290. "Fear of coronavirus fuels racist sentiment targeting Asians". Los Angeles Times. 3 February 2020. Archived from the original on 5 February 2020. Retrieved 25 March 2020.
  291. Sui C (15 April 2020). "China's Racism Is Wrecking Its Success in Africa". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 16 April 2020.
  292. Kuo L, Davidson H (29 March 2020). "'They see my blue eyes then jump back' – China sees a new wave of xenophobia". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 11 May 2020. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
  293. Anthony I (9 April 2020). "Africans evicted from Chinese hotels over COVID-19 fears". The News-Chronicle. Archived from the original on 14 May 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  294. Hannah Ellis-Petersen H, Rahman SA (13 April 2020). "Coronavirus conspiracy theories targeting Muslims spread in India". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2020.
  295. Colborne M (26 March 2020). "As world struggles to stop deaths, far right celebrates COVID-19". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 1 June 2021. Retrieved 4 July 2021.
  296. ^ Palmer J (27 January 2020). "Don't Blame Bat Soup for the Wuhan Virus". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 3 February 2020. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
  297. ^ Taylor J (30 January 2020). "Bat soup, dodgy cures and 'diseasology': the spread of coronavirus misinformation". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 8 February 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  298. ^ O'Neill M (29 January 2020). "Chinese influencer Wang Mengyun, aka 'Bat soup girl' breaks silence". news.au. Archived from the original on 8 February 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  299. ^ Gaynor GK (28 January 2020). "Coronavirus: Outrage over Chinese blogger eating 'bat soup' sparks apology". Fox News. Archived from the original on 4 February 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  300. ^ Sharma G (5 March 2020). "Why are there so many conspiracy theories around the coronavirus?". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 29 March 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  301. Romm T (1 March 2020). "Millions of tweets peddled conspiracy theories about coronavirus in other countries, an unpublished U.S. report says". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 9 March 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  302. Hussain S (3 February 2020). "Fear of coronavirus fuels racist sentiment targeting Asians". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 5 February 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  303. Brueck H (27 February 2020). "14 bogus claims about the coronavirus, including a fake coconut-oil cure and a false link to imported packages". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 7 March 2020.
  304. Khatouki C. "Clandestine Cults and Cynical Politics: How South Korea Became the New Coronavirus Epicenter". thediplomat.com. The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 13 March 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2020.
  305. ^ Ratna. "Fact Check: Social media users give misleading twist to PM Modi's concept of 'Janta curfew'". India Today. Retrieved 22 March 2020.
  306. "Costco is not recalling bath tissue due to novel coronavirus contamination". AFP Fact Check. 13 March 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2020.
  307. "Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 11 February 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2020.
  308. Achenbach J (13 March 2020). "Coronavirus can stay infectious for days on surfaces. But it's still okay to check your mail". The Washington Post.
  309. "Australia's Department of Health did not issue a warning that 'using petrol pumps can spread COVID-19'". AFP Fact Check. 25 March 2020. Archived from the original on 31 March 2020. Retrieved 3 April 2020.
  310. "Hoax circulates online that people wearing shoes indoors triggered hike in COVID-19 cases in Italy". AFP Fact Check. 9 April 2020.
  311. Cardona AC (11 March 2020). "Leaked Emails: Norwegian Pressures Sales Team to Mislead Potential Customers About Coronavirus". Miami New Times. Archived from the original on 12 March 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2020.
  312. Gander K (11 February 2020). "Could Coronavirus Really Be Killed by Hot Weather? Scientists Weigh In". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2020. Ravinder Kanda, senior lecturer in evolutionary genomics at Oxford Brookes University, U.K., told Newsweek: 'Little is known about the seasonal dynamics of this particular virus—we cannot take it for granted that the warmer weather will simply drive the virus out of existence.'
  313. Gunia A (28 February 2020). "Will Warmer Weather Stop the Spread of the Coronavirus? Don't Count on It, Say Experts". Time. Archived from the original on 9 March 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2020. Nancy Messionnier of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, warned against assuming the number of cases will slow as the weather warms. 'I think it's premature to assume that,' she said during a call with reporters on February 12. 'We haven't been through even a single year with this pathogen.'
  314. Farber M (20 February 2020). "Will the coronavirus die out as the weather warms?". Fox News. Archived from the original on 5 March 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2020. 'We hope that the gradual spring will help this virus recede, but our crystal ball is not very clear. The new coronavirus is a respiratory virus, and we know respiratory viruses are often seasonal, but not always. For example, influenza (flu) tends to be seasonal in the US, but in other parts of the world, it exists year-round. Scientists don't fully understand why even though we have been studying flu for many years,' William Schaffner, the medical director of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, told Fox News in an email.
  315. Venkatesh S, Memish ZA (25 January 2004). "SARS: the new challenge to international health and travel medicine". Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 10 (4–5): 655–62. doi:10.26719/2004.10.4-5.655. PMID 16335659. S2CID 20070843.
  316. Browne A, Ahmad SS, Beck CR, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS (January 2016). "The roles of transportation and transportation hubs in the propagation of influenza and coronaviruses: a systematic review". Journal of Travel Medicine. 23 (1): tav002. doi:10.1093/jtm/tav002. PMC 7539332. PMID 26782122. S2CID 23224351.
  317. Mallapaty S (April 2020). "What the cruise-ship outbreaks reveal about COVID-19". Nature. 580 (7801): 18. Bibcode:2020Natur.580...18M. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00885-w. PMID 32218546. S2CID 214680372.
  318. "Agencies encourage women to continue to breastfeed during the COVID-19 pandemic". World Health Organization. Retrieved 8 March 2021.
  319. Maggie Fox (8 May 2020). "Coronavirus found in men's semen". CNN. Retrieved 16 February 2022.
  320. ^ "Covid-19 found in semen of infected men, say Chinese doctors". The Guardian. Reuters. 7 May 2020. Retrieved 16 February 2022.
  321. Howard J, Huang A, Li Z, Tufekci Z, Zdimal V, van der Westhuizen HM, et al. (January 2021). "An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 118 (4): e2014564118. Bibcode:2021PNAS..11814564H. doi:10.1073/pnas.2014564118. PMC 7848583. PMID 33431650.
  322. ^ "Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 11 February 2020.
  323. Crellin Z (4 March 2020). "Those Viral Posts Claiming Hand Sanitiser Doesn't Kill Coronavirus Are Wrong & Here's Why". Pedestrian.TV. Archived from the original on 5 March 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  324. Kingsland J (2 July 2020). "COVID-19: Hand sanitizers inactivate novel coronavirus, study finds". Medical News Today. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  325. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (3 March 2020). "Show Me the Science – When & How to Use Hand Sanitizer in Community Settings". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
  326. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2 April 2020). "When and How to Wash Your Hands". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
  327. "Q&A for Consumers: Hand Sanitizers and COVID-19". U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 13 April 2020.
  328. "Antibacterial Soap? You Can Skip It, Use Plain Soap and Water". U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 16 May 2019.
  329. Griffiths J (2 April 2020). "Asia may have been right about coronavirus and face masks, and the rest of the world is coming around". CNN.
  330. Watterson A (17 April 2020). "Through all the misinformation, what is the truth of wearing face masks?". The National.
  331. Frank TA (8 April 2020). ""I Was Looking at Them in the Wrong Way": Mask Misinformation and the Failure of the Elites". Vanity Fair.
  332. ^ Huo J (10 April 2020). "Why There Are So Many Different Guidelines For Face Masks For The Public". NPR.
  333. "Coronavirus: Abrupt reversals on face mask policy raise new questions". France 24. 5 April 2020.
  334. Walther M (4 April 2020). "The noble lie about masks and coronavirus should never have been told". The Week.
  335. Tufekci Z (17 March 2020). "Why Telling People They Don't Need Masks Backfired". The New York Times.
  336. Quinn M (12 July 2020). "Surgeon general says administration "trying to correct" earlier guidance against wearing masks". CBS News.
  337. Allassan F (12 July 2020). ""When we learn better, we do better": Surgeon general defends reversal on face mask policy". Axios. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020.
  338. Madhani A (27 June 2020). "What to wear: Feds' mixed messages on masks sow confusion". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 30 August 2020.
  339. Jankowicz M (15 June 2020). "Fauci said US government held off promoting face masks because it knew shortages were so bad that even doctors couldn't get enough". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 16 September 2020.
  340. Ross K (12 June 2020). "Dr. Fauci Explains Why Public Wasn't Told to Wear Masks When COVID-19 Pandemic Began". TheStreet.
  341. Kelley A (16 June 2020). "Fauci: why the public wasn't told to wear masks when the coronavirus pandemic began". The Hill.
  342. McArdle M (16 June 2020). "Fauci Confirms Public-Health Experts Downplayed Efficacy of Masks to Ensure They Would Be Available to Health-care Workers". National Review.
  343. ^ Lambert J (12 August 2020). "4 reasons you shouldn't trash your neck gaiter based on the new mask study". Science News.
  344. ^ Saplakoglu Y (13 August 2020). "Should you ditch your gaiter as a face mask? Not so fast, scientists say". Live Science.
  345. Parker-Pope T (17 August 2020). "Save the Gaiters!". The New York Times.
  346. Krubsack R (14 August 2020). "Gaiters getting a bad rap for COVID-19 protection?". J. J. Keller.
  347. Bessonov A (18 July 2020). "Do masks reduce your oxygen levels? Your COVID-19 questions answered". CBC News.
  348. Shepherd M (1 July 2020). "This Myth About Carbon Dioxide And Masks Is Similar To A Debunked Claim About Climate Change". Forbes.
  349. Forster V (17 May 2020). "Wearing A Mask To Protect Against Covid-19 Coronavirus Will Not Weaken Your Immune System". Forbes.
  350. "Fact check: People have not been developing antibiotic-resistant pneumonia from wearing face masks". Reuters. 23 September 2020.
  351. Dwyer D (30 July 2020). "Few medical reasons for not wearing a face mask". ABC News.
  352. Brown M (16 July 2020). "Fact check: ADA does not provide blanket exemption from face mask requirements". USA Today.
  353. Hanrahan M (29 June 2020). "Group behind fraudulent 'face mask exempt' cards pledges to keep distributing them, despite website takedown". ABC News.
  354. "COVID-19 ALERT: Fraudulent Facemask Flyers – USAO-MDNC – Department of Justice". justice.gov. Greensboro, NC: United States Department of Justice. 25 June 2020. Archived from the original on 28 August 2020. Retrieved 21 September 2020. U.S. Attorney Matthew G.T. Martin of the Middle District of North Carolina today urged the public to be aware regarding fraudulent postings, cards, or flyers on the internet regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the use of face masks due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many of which include the United States Department of Justice's seal. "Do not be fooled by the chicanery and misappropriation of the DOJ eagle," said U.S. Attorney Martin. "These cards do not carry the force of law. The 'Freedom to Breathe Agency,' or 'FTBA,' is not a government agency."
  355. Beauchamp GA, Valento M (September 2016). "Toxic Alcohol Ingestion: Prompt Recognition And Management In The Emergency Department". Emergency Medicine Practice. 18 (9): 1–20. PMID 27538060.
  356. ^ Trew B (27 March 2020). "Coronavirus: Hundreds dead in Iran from drinking methanol amid fake reports it cures disease". The Independent. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  357. "9 kişi daha saf alkolden öldü" [9 more died from pure alcohol]. CNN Türk (in Turkish). 25 March 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  358. Aydın C (20 March 2020). "Katil: Sahte alkol" [The killer: fake alcohol]. Hürriyet Daily News (in Turkish). Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  359. ^ Hannon E (27 March 2020). "Hundreds Die in Iran From Bootleg Alcohol Being Peddled Online as Fake Coronavirus Remedy". Slate. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  360. ^ "In Iran, False Belief a Poison Fights Virus Kills Hundreds". The New York Times. 27 March 2020. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  361. "Over 700 Iranians Dead From Methanol Poisoning Over False Belief the Chemical Cures COVID-19". Time. Associated Press. 27 April 2020. Archived from the original on 1 May 2020.
  362. Feleke B (22 April 2020). "Kenya governor under fire after putting Hennessy bottles in coronavirus care packages". CNN.
  363. Lange J (17 April 2020). "The governor of Nairobi is putting Hennessy in residents' coronavirus care packages". The Week.
  364. "French researchers suggest nicotine could protect against coronavirus". Radio France Internationale.com. 23 April 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2021.
  365. van Zyl-Smit RN, Richards G, Leone FT (July 2020). "Tobacco smoking and COVID-19 infection". The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine. 8 (7): 664–665. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30239-3. PMC 7247798. PMID 32464099.
  366. Crellin Z (9 March 2020). "Sorry to the French People Who Thought Cocaine Would Protect Them From Coronavirus". Pedestrian.TV. Archived from the original on 11 March 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  367. Lucía M (12 March 2020). "Alberto Fernández: "La OMS recomienda que uno tome muchas bebidas calientes porque el calor mata al virus"" [Alberto Fernández: "The WHO recommends that one drink many hot drinks because heat kills the virus"]. Chequeado (in Spanish). Retrieved 10 July 2020.
  368. Holmes O, Kierszenbaum (6 April 2020). "Calls to seal off ultra-Orthodox areas add to Israel's virus tensions". The Guardian.
  369. Halbfinger DM (30 March 2020). "Virus soars among ultra-orthodox Jews as many flout Israel's rules". The New York Times.
  370. Duncan C (16 March 2020). "Coronavirus: Nearly 50 church goers infected in South Korea after spraying salt water 'cure'". The Independent.
  371. Sang-Hun C (10 March 2020). "'Proselytizing Robots': Inside South Korean Church at Outbreak's Center". The New York Times.
  372. "Coronavirus: South Korea sect leader to face probe over deaths". BBC. 2 March 2020.
  373. Bariyo N, Parkinson J (8 April 2020). "Tanzania's Leader Urges People to Worship in Throngs Against Coronavirus". The Wall Street Journal.
  374. "Coronavirus: Why Ghana has gone into mourning after mass funeral ban". BBC. 26 March 2020.
  375. ^ Kambas M, Georgiopoulos G (9 March 2020). "In era of coronavirus, Greek church says Holy Communion will carry on". Reuters. Archived from the original on 12 March 2020. Retrieved 10 March 2020.
  376. "Inside Europe: Greek Orthodox Church weighs in on coronavirus". Deutsche Welle. 13 March 2020. Archived from the original on 18 March 2020. Retrieved 18 March 2020.
  377. ^ Brzozowski A, Michalopoulos S (9 March 2020). "Catholics take measures against coronavirus while Greek Orthodox Church 'prays'". euractiv.com. Archived from the original on 18 March 2020. Retrieved 18 March 2020.
  378. Aswestopoulos W (9 March 2020). "Corona-Panik nur für Ungläubige?" [Corona panic only for unbelievers?]. heise online (in German). Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 18 March 2020.
  379. Anyfantakis D (2020). "Holy Communion and Infection Transmission: A Literature Review". Cureus. 12 (6): e8741. doi:10.7759/cureus.8741. PMC 7377019. PMID 32714679.
  380. "How Mass Pilgrimage at Malaysian Mosque Became Coronavirus Hotspot". Reuters. 17 March 2020. Archived from the original on 4 April 2020. Retrieved 2 April 2020.
  381. "'God Will Protect Us': Coronavirus Spreads Through an Already Struggling Pakistan". The New York Times. 26 March 2020. Archived from the original on 12 May 2020.
  382. "1445 out of 4067 Covid-19 cases linked to Tablighi Jamaat: Health Ministry". Hindustan Times.
  383. "Iran cleric encourages visitors to Qom religious sites, despite coronavirus fears". Middle East Monitor. 27 February 2020. Archived from the original on 3 March 2020. Retrieved 3 March 2020.
  384. Hujale M (22 April 2020). "Ramadan in Somalia: fears coronavirus cases will climb as gatherings continue". The Guardian. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
  385. "False claim circulates online that certain countries in Asia are using helicopters to spray 'COVID-19 disinfectant'". AFP Fact Check. 26 March 2020. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 3 April 2020.
  386. "Indian authorities refute 'fake' advisory which claimed disinfectant would be sprayed across India to tackle COVID-19". AFP Fact Check. 20 March 2020. Archived from the original on 8 April 2020. Retrieved 3 April 2020.
  387. "WHO did not warn against eating cabbage during the COVID-19 pandemic". AFP Fact Check. 31 March 2020. Archived from the original on 2 April 2020. Retrieved 3 April 2020.
  388. "11 in AP hospitalised after following TikTok poisonous 'remedy' for COVID-19". thenewsminute.com. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  389. ^ "Twelve taken ill after consuming 'coronavirus shaped' datura seeds". The Hindu. 7 April 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  390. "'No Meat, No Coronavirus' Makes No Sense". The Wire. Archived from the original on 3 March 2020. Retrieved 3 March 2020.
  391. Nur Ibrahim (14 May 2020). "Are Vegetarians Safe from COVID-19?". Snopes.
  392. "Health experts say there is no evidence vitamin D is effective in preventing novel coronavirus infection". AFP Fact Check. 27 February 2020. Archived from the original on 16 October 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  393. Schraer R (5 April 2021). "Vitamin D: The truth about an alleged Covid 'cover-up'". BBC News.
  394. Tentolouris N, Samakidou G, Eleftheriadou I, Tentolouris A, Jude EB (May 2022). "The effect of vitamin D supplementation on mortality and intensive care unit admission of COVID-19 patients. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression". Diabetes Metab Res Rev (Systematic review). 38 (4): e3517. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3517. PMC 9015406. PMID 34965318.
  395. Henrina J, Lim MA, Pranata R (February 2021). "COVID-19 and misinformation: how an infodemic fuelled the prominence of vitamin D". The British Journal of Nutrition (Letter). 125 (3): 359–360. doi:10.1017/S0007114520002950. PMC 7443564. PMID 32713358.
  396. Quinn EK, Fenton S, Ford-Sahibzada CA, Harper A, Marcon AR, Caulfield T, et al. (14 March 2022). "COVID-19 and Vitamin D Misinformation on YouTube: Content Analysis". JMIR Infodemiology. 2 (1): e32452. doi:10.2196/32452. PMC 8924908. PMID 35310014.
  397. Lynas M (20 April 2020). "COVID: Top 10 current conspiracy theories". Alliance for Science. Retrieved 4 October 2021.
  398. Burakovsky A (28 August 2021). "Russia's COVID-19 response slowed by population reluctant to take domestic vaccine". KRQE. Retrieved 20 September 2021.
  399. "A Covid pass takes France by storm". WLFI News. Archived from the original on 20 September 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2021.
  400. "MLB offers free tickets for COVID-19 vaccinations". Kron4. 4 June 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2021.
  401. Gore D (10 May 2021). "Exploring the legality of COVID-19 vaccine mandates". factcheck.org. Retrieved 4 October 2021.
  402. Hotez PJ (2023). The Deadly Rise of Anti-science: A Scientist's Warning. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-1421447223.
  403. Heer J (30 March 2020). "All the President's Crackpots". The Nation.
  404. Orr C (1 April 2020). "Right-wing conspiracy theories go mainstream amid mounting COVID-19 death toll". National Observer. Retrieved 2 April 2020.
  405. Ahmed W (15 October 2020). "'Film Your Hospital' – the anatomy of a COVID-19 conspiracy theory". The Conversation. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
  406. Taylor A (28 March 2020). "Social media awash with fake treatments for coronavirus". The Sydney Morning Herald.
  407. Wee SL (5 February 2020). "In Coronavirus, China Weighs Benefits of Buffalo Horn and Other Remedies". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 15 February 2020.
  408. Leng Y, Zhai Y, Sun S, Wu Y, Selzer J, Strover S, et al. (1 March 2021). "Misinformation During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Cultural, Social and Political Entanglements". IEEE Transactions on Big Data. 7 (1): 69–80. doi:10.1109/TBDATA.2021.3055758. ISSN 2332-7790. PMC 8769030. PMID 37974653. S2CID 263892508.
  409. "Covid-19 in Madagascar: The president's controversial 'miracle cure'". France 24. 5 May 2020.
  410. "Coronavirus: Caution urged over Madagascar's 'herbal cure'". BBC. 22 April 2020.
  411. "Echinacea als vermeintliches Mittel gegen das neue Coronavirus". swissmedic.ch (in German). Retrieved 18 September 2020.
  412. Bramstedt KA (January 2021). "Unicorn Poo and Blessed Waters: COVID-19 Quackery and FDA Warning Letters". Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 55 (1): 239–244. doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00224-1. ISSN 2168-4790. PMC 7528445. PMID 33001378.
  413. "Vitamin C". COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines. 21 April 2021. Archived from the original on 20 November 2021. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
  414. "COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines". U.S. National Institutes of Health. 26 December 2022. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
  415. "Hoax circulates online that an old Indian textbook lists treatments for COVID-19". AFP Fact Check. 9 April 2020.
  416. "Saline solution kills China coronavirus? Experts refute online rumour". AFP Fact Check. 24 January 2020. Archived from the original on 1 April 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  417. Godoy M (18 March 2020). "Concerned About Taking Ibuprofen For Coronavirus Symptoms? Here's What Experts Say". NPR.
  418. "Fact Finders: Do ibuprofen and other common medications make COVID-19 symptoms worse?". MSN.
  419. "Coronavirus: Can cow dung and urine help cure the novel coronavirus?". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 5 March 2020.
  420. "Novel coronavirus can be cured with gaumutra, gobar claims Assam BJP MLA Suman Haripriya". Firstpost. 3 March 2020. Archived from the original on 4 March 2020. Retrieved 5 March 2020.
  421. Parashar U (18 May 2021). "2 booked under NSA in Manipur for FB posts that cow dung won't cure Covid-19". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 20 May 2021.
  422. Upadhyay A, Som V (3 March 2020). Bhaskar S (ed.). "Novel Coronavirus Outbreak: "India's Response And Surveillance Has Been Quite Robust," Says WHO's Chief Scientist". NDTV. Retrieved 5 March 2020. Q: In a situation like this when we need scientific solution to a medical crisis, when you get in our country for examples, political leaders saying things like cow dung or cow urine can be beneficial in fixing something like coronavirus, do we end up taking a step back after such statements, as we need to deal with the issue in a modern scientific manner.
    A: I completely agree, I think all the public figures including politicians need to be extra careful when it comes to making such statements, because they have such a huge following. It's really important for them to say things that are based on some scientific evidence ... when it comes to the claims of cures of this infection we should be extremely careful about our statements and it should be made by the people who know what they're talking about. And has to be backed by evidence.
  423. "What is 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) and is it effective against Covid?". The Economic Times. 17 May 2021.
  424. ^ "DCGI approves anti-COVID drug developed by DRDO for emergency use". Press Information Bureau, Government of India-IN. 8 May 2021. Retrieved 9 May 2021.
  425. Ahmad F (28 May 2021). "Which Ayurvedic college did Ramdev go to? IMA and politicians also responsible for his rise". National Herald.
  426. ^ Borana R (12 May 2021). "India's Drug Regulator Has Approved DRDO's New COVID Drug on Missing Evidence". The Wire Science-GB. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
  427. ^ Koshy J (11 May 2021). "Questions remain on DRDO's COVID drug-IN". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
  428. 新冠肺炎治疗:讲究实证的西医和自我定位的中药 [Treating the novel coronavirus: the empirical Western medicine and the self-positioning Chinese medicine]. BBC News 中文 (in Simplified Chinese). 14 February 2020.
  429. 中医来了!8个防治"协定方" 辅助治疗新型冠状病毒感染肺炎 [Here comes Chinese medicine! 8 "agreed-on prescriptions" help prevent and treat the new coronavirus pneumonia]. CCTV News (in Chinese (China)). Retrieved 15 February 2020.
  430. 中国发布 | 国家中医药管理局:清肺排毒汤对治疗新冠肺炎有疗效 [National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine: The "lung-clearing detoxing decoction" is effective against COVID-19]. Chinanet (in Simplified Chinese). Sina News. 17 February 2020. Retrieved 17 February 2020.
  431. ICU内外的中西医合作 – 专家谈中医药在抗击新冠肺炎中的重要作用 [Co-operation between Chinese and Western medicine inside and outside of the ICU – experts talk about the vital role of TCM in the fight against COVID-19] (in Simplified Chinese). Xinhua News Agency. 16 March 2020.
  432. Jones DS (1 April 2020). "A British Newspaper Has Given Chinese Coronavirus Propaganda A Direct Line To The UK". BuzzFeed News. Retrieved 8 January 2021.
  433. Tijani M (21 February 2020). "Anti-malaria drug has proven effective in treating coronavirus but has not cured 12,552 patients". AFP Fact Check. Agence France-Presse. Retrieved 7 April 2020.
  434. Robins-Early N (13 May 2020). "The Strange Origins Of Trump's Hydroxychloroquine Obsession". HuffPost. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
  435. Tafoya QJ (2021). "Appendix – COVID-19-Directed Medications". In Ramadan AR, Gamaleldin O (eds.). Neurological Care and the COVID-19 Pandemic (1st ed.). Elsevier. pp. 173–174. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-82691-4.00016-9. ISBN 978-0-323-82691-4. S2CID 239763031. The WHO, the European Medicines Agency, and the IDSA all recommend against the use of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19, with the NIH stating that there is insufficient data to recommend for or against its use outside the context of a clinical trial.
  436. "WHO advises that ivermectin only be used to treat COVID-19 within clinical trials". Newsroom. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 31 March 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2023.
  437. "EMA advises against use of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 outside randomised clinical trials". News. European Medicines Agency. Amsterdam. 22 March 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2023.
  438. "Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19". United States Food and Drug Administration. Consumer Updates. Silver Spring, Maryland: Food and Drug Administration. 10 December 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2023.
  439. "IDSA Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients with COVID-19: Recommendations 23-24: Ivermectin". Infectious Diseases Society of America. IDSA Practice Guidelines. Arlington, Virginia. 11 April 2023. Retrieved 12 May 2023.
  440. Caly L, Druce JD, Catton MG, Jans DA, Wagstaff KM (June 2020). "The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro". Antiviral Research. 178: 104787. doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104787. PMC 7129059. PMID 32251768.
  441. Woo E (28 September 2021). "How Covid Misinformation Created a Run on Animal Medicine". New York Times. Archived from the original on 7 January 2022. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  442. Langford C (1 September 2023). "Fifth Circuit sides with ivermectin-prescribing doctors in their quarrel with the FDA". Courthouse News Service.
  443. Popp M, Reis S, Schießer S, Hausinger RI, Stegemann M, Metzendorf MI, et al. (June 2022). "Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Systematic review). 2022 (6): CD015017. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub3. PMC 9215332. PMID 35726131.
  444. Reis G, Silva EA, Silva DC, Thabane L, Milagres AC, Ferreira TS, et al. (May 2022). "Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19". N Engl J Med (Randomized controlled trial). 386 (18): 1721–1731. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2115869. PMC 9006771. PMID 35353979.
  445. Lawrence JM, Meyerowitz-Katz G, Heathers JA, Brown NJ, Sheldrick KA (November 2021). "The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable". Nature Medicine. 27 (11): 1853–1854. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01535-y. PMID 34552263. S2CID 237607620.
  446. Schraer R, Goodman J (6 October 2021). "Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid 'miracle' drug". BBC News. Archived from the original on 8 January 2022. Retrieved 26 December 2021.
  447. Melissa Davey (15 July 2021). "Huge study supporting ivermectin as Covid treatment withdrawn over ethical concerns". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 January 2022. Retrieved 12 May 2023.
  448. Sommer W (28 January 2020). "QAnon-ers' Magic Cure for Coronavirus: Just Drink Bleach!". Daily Beast. Archived from the original on 10 February 2020. Retrieved 14 February 2020.
  449. Ryan J (27 June 2021). "Misplaced Pages is at war over the coronavirus lab leak theory". CNET. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
  450. "TikTok coronavirus 'remedy' lands 10 in hospital". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
  451. Sopchak CA, Stork CM, Cantor RM, Ohara PE (29 July 2009). "Central anticholinergic syndrome due to Jimson weed physostigmine: therapy revisited?". Journal of Toxicology. Clinical Toxicology. 36 (1–2): 43–5. doi:10.3109/15563659809162583. PMID 9541041.
  452. Mahler DA (1 June 1976). "Anticholinergic poisoning from Jimson weed". Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians. 5 (6): 440–442. doi:10.1016/S0361-1124(76)80254-7. ISSN 0361-1124. PMID 933412. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
  453. Moyler H (12 February 2020). "Televangelist Sells $125 'Silver Solution' as Cure for Coronavirus". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 15 February 2020. Retrieved 15 February 2020.
  454. Schwartz MS (11 March 2020). "Missouri Sues Televangelist Jim Bakker For Selling Fake Coronavirus Cure". NPR. Archived from the original on 12 March 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  455. Aratani L (9 March 2020). "New York attorney general to televangelist: stop touting product as coronavirus cure". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 March 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  456. Porter J (13 March 2020). "Alex Jones ordered to stop selling fake coronavirus cures". The Verge. Archived from the original on 16 March 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  457. Ferré-Sadurní L, McKinley J (13 March 2020). "Alex Jones Is Told to Stop Selling Sham Anti-Coronavirus Toothpaste". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 March 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  458. Owermohle S (9 April 2020). "FDA warns Alex Jones over false coronavirus claims". Politico. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  459. "Coronavirus: The health advice that is misleading or worse". Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  460. "Mustard Oil Helps Fight COVID? Ramdev's Claim Lacks Medical Proof". Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  461. Rogers K, Hauser C, Yuhas A, Haberman M (24 April 2020). "Trump's Suggestion That Disinfectants Could Be Used to Treat Coronavirus Prompts Aggressive Pushback". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  462. Sengupta T (20 March 2020). "Is government spraying coronavirus vaccine using airplanes? No, it's fake news". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 22 March 2020.
  463. Kazeem Y (28 February 2020). "Nigeria's biggest battle with coronavirus will be beating misinformation". Quartz Africa. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
  464. Young J (27 March 2020). "Actor Keith Middlebrook arrested by FBI for allegedly peddling bogus coronavirus cure". MSN. Archived from the original on 15 April 2020. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  465. Lemon J (12 March 2020). "Conservative pastor claims he "healed" viewers of coronavirus through their TV screens". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 16 March 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  466. Kelleher P (13 March 2020). "This anti-LGBT+ televangelist tried to heal people of the coronavirus through their televisions". PinkNews. Archived from the original on 14 March 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  467. "India coronavirus: Rumours hamper testing in Punjab". BBC News. 9 September 2020.
  468. Mikkelson D (26 March 2020). "Does COVID Stand for 'Chinese-Originated Viral Infectious Disease'?". Snopes.com. Retrieved 21 April 2020.
  469. "Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the EU/EEA and the UK" (PDF). ecdc. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 March 2020. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  470. "Fact check: COVID-19 does not mean "see a sheep surrender"". Reuters. 30 June 2020.
  471. Mason C (3 March 2020). "An image from The Simpsons was digitally altered to make it look like it predicted the novel coronavirus". AFP Fact Check.
  472. Carras C (29 February 2020). "Did 'The Simpsons' really predict the coronavirus outbreak? Twitter thinks so". Chicago Tribune.
  473. ^ Daly N (20 March 2020). "Fake animal news abounds on social media as coronavirus upends life". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 20 March 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  474. Spry Jr T (19 March 2020). "Verify: Did elephants get drunk on corn wine while humans were social distancing?". KTVB. Archived from the original on 20 March 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  475. Srikanth A (18 March 2020). "As Italy quarantines over coronavirus, swans appear in Venice canals, dolphins swim up playfully". The Hill. Archived from the original on 19 March 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
  476. Evon D (27 March 2020). "Was a Rare Malabar Civet Spotted During COVID-19 Lockdown?". Snopes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  477. "Fact Check: Does viral video show whales swimming at Bombay High? Here's the truth". Hindustan Times. 5 April 2020. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
  478. Friedman U (2020). "The Coronavirus-Denial Movement Now Has a Leader". The Atlantic. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  479. Phillips T (2020). "Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro says coronavirus crisis is a media trick". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077.
  480. Phillips T, Briso CB (2020). "Bolsonaro's anti-science response to coronavirus appals Brazil's governors". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077.
  481. Walsh J. "Elon Musk's False Covid Predictions: A Timeline". Forbes. Retrieved 17 February 2022.
  482. "Don't Be Shocked Trump Lied About COVID On Tape. Be Horrified That It Won't Matter". Wbur. 9 September 2020. Retrieved 17 February 2022.
  483. "Six months of Trump's Covid denials: 'It'll go away … It's fading'". The Guardian. 29 July 2020. Retrieved 17 February 2022.
  484. "Bolsonaro's most controversial coronavirus quotes". France 24. 19 June 2021. Retrieved 17 February 2022.
  485. "Antisemitism in the Digital Age: Online Antisemitic Hate, Holocaust Denial, Conspiracy Ideologies and Terrorism in Europe". Hope not Hate. 13 October 2021. Retrieved 23 September 2023.
  486. ^ Piper E, Wildon J (22 October 2021). "Telegram COVID-19 Conspiracy Group Rife With Antisemitism". Logically. Retrieved 23 September 2023.
  487. "Antisemitism in the Digital Age: Online Antisemitic Hate, Holocaust Denial, Conspiracy Ideologies and Terrorism in Europe" (PDF). Hope not Hate. 13 October 2021. Retrieved 23 September 2023.
  488. Toropin K (14 June 2024). "Pentagon Stands by Secret Anti-Vaccination Disinformation Campaign in Philippines After Reuters Report". Military.com. Archived from the original on 14 June 2024. Retrieved 19 June 2024.
  489. ^ "Pentagon ran secret anti-vax campaign to undermine China during pandemic".
  490. "US ran secret anti-vax campaign to undermine China's COVID efforts: Report".
  491. "Pentagon Launched Secret Anti-Vax Campaign To Discredit China During COVID Pandemic, Report Says". Forbes.
  492. World Health Organization (2020). Novel Coronavirus (‎2019-nCoV)‎: situation report, 13 (Report). World Health Organization. hdl:10665/330778.
  493. "Coronavirus: UN health agency moves fast to tackle 'infodemic'; Guterres warns against stigmatization". UN News. 4 February 2020. Archived from the original on 5 February 2020. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  494. Akhtar T (5 February 2020). "WHO Says There's No Effective Coronavirus Treatment Yet". Yahoo! Finance. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 6 February 2020.
  495. Elassar A (17 March 2020). "One dangerous coronavirus 'self-check test' is circulating on social media. Here's why you should avoid it". CNN. Archived from the original on 17 March 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  496. Richtel M (6 February 2020). "W.H.O. Fights a Pandemic Besides Coronavirus: an 'Infodemic'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2020.
  497. "As coronavirus misinformation spreads on social media, Facebook removes posts". Reuters. 1 February 2020. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2020.
  498. Benson T (4 March 2020). "Facebook announces how it plans to help fight the coronavirus". Inverse. Archived from the original on 6 March 2020. Retrieved 5 March 2020.
  499. Frenkel S, Alba D (30 April 2020). "Trump's Disinfectant Talk Trips Up Sites' Vows Against Misinformation". The New York Times. Retrieved 2 May 2020.
  500. Lerman R (11 August 2020). "Facebook says it has taken down 7 million posts for spreading coronavirus misinformation". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
  501. "Amazon culls one million fake coronavirus products". BBC News. 28 February 2020. Archived from the original on 1 March 2020. Retrieved 1 March 2020.
  502. Cinelli M, Quattrociocchi W, Galeazzi A, Valensise CM, Brugnoli E, Schmidt AL, et al. (October 2020). "The COVID-19 social media infodemic". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 16598. arXiv:2003.05004. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5. PMC 7538912. PMID 33024152.
  503. "'Fact before rumors' campaign just began by the IBS Data Science Group". Institute for Basic Science. 26 March 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  504. Meeyoung C (24 March 2020). "코로나바이러스와 인포데믹" [Coronavirus and infodemic]. Institute for Basic Science (in Korean). Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  505. ""동남아·남미 코로나 가짜뉴스 막고 '진짜뉴스' 전하자" 국내 과학자 팔 걷어" ["Let's stop fake news from Southeast Asia and South America and deliver 'real news'"]. Donga Science (in Korean). 25 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  506. "[차미영의 데이터로 본 세상] '인포데믹'의 시대" [(The world seen through Cha Mi-young's data) The era of'infodemic']. 한국경제 (in Korean). 25 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  507. Combating online hostile posts in regional languages during emergency situation : first international workshop, CONSTRAINT 2021, collocated with AAAI 2021, virtual event, February 8, 2021 : revised selected papers. Springer. 2021. ISBN 978-3-030-73696-5.
  508. J. Lukas Thürmer, Sean M. McCrea (5 January 2022). "On Efficient Mass-Media Messages During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Expertise and Expressed Social Identity". Technology, Mind, and Behavior. 3. doi:10.1037/tmb0000052. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
  509. Cohem N (15 March 2020). "How Misplaced Pages Prevents the Spread of Coronavirus Misinformation". Wired. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  510. Harrison S (19 March 2020). "The Coronavirus Is Stress-Testing Misplaced Pages's Policies". Salon. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  511. Benjakob O (8 April 2020). "Why Misplaced Pages Is Immune to Coronavirus". Haaretz. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
  512. Ryan J (27 June 2021). "Misplaced Pages is at war over the coronavirus lab leak theory". CNET. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  513. Ryan J (24 June 2021). "Inside Misplaced Pages's endless war over the coronavirus lab leak theory". CNET. Retrieved 27 June 2021.
  514. McNeil DG (22 October 2020). "Misplaced Pages and W.H.O. Join to Combat Covid-19 Misinformation". The New York Times. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  515. Jerde S (12 March 2020). "Major Publishers Take Down Paywalls for Coronavirus Coverage". Adweek. Retrieved 25 March 2020.
  516. Kottke J. "Media Paywalls Dropped for COVID-19 Crisis Coverage". kottke.org. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  517. "Sharing research data and findings relevant to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak". wellcome.ac.uk (Press release). 31 January 2020. Retrieved 13 February 2020.
  518. Van der Walt W, Willems KA, Friedrich W, Hatsu S, Krauss K (2020). "Retracted Covid-19 papers and the levels of 'citation pollution': A preliminary analysis and directions for further research". Cahiers de la Documentation – Bladen voor Documentatie. 3 (4). hdl:10962/167732.
  519. "Retracted coronavirus (COVID-19) papers". Retraction Watch. 29 April 2020. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
  520. "'Menace to public health': 270 doctors criticize Spotify over Joe Rogan's podcast". The Guardian. 14 January 2022. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  521. Dickson EJ (12 January 2022). "'A Menace to Public Health': Doctors Demand Spotify Puts an End to Covid Lies on 'Joe Rogan Experience'". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  522. "Coronavirus Has Started a Censorship Pandemic". The Foreign Policy. 1 April 2020.
  523. "Iran Says 3,600 Arrested For Spreading Coronavirus-Related Rumors". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). 29 April 2020.
  524. "Cambodia accused of political clampdown amid coronavirus outbreak". Al Jazeera. 24 March 2020. Archived from the original on 1 April 2020.
  525. Pinol M (17 April 2020). "Cambodia's Lost Digital Opportunity in the COVID-19 Fight". The Diplomat.
  526. "Algeria rights groups say government cracking down on critics". Al Jazeera. 23 April 2020.
  527. Aspinwall N (3 April 2020). "The Philippines' Coronavirus Lockdown Is Becoming a Crackdown". The Diplomat.
  528. Broderick R (29 January 2020). "China Is Using Fears Of Online Misinformation About The Coronavirus To Arrest People". BuzzFeed News.
  529. Dore B (17 April 2020). "Fake News, Real Arrests". Foreign Policy.
  530. ^ "Asia cracks down on coronavirus 'fake news'". The Straits Times. 10 April 2020.
  531. Michaelson R (3 April 2020). "Reporting on the coronavirus: Egypt muzzles critical journalists". Deutsche Welle.
  532. "Ethiopia: Free Speech at Risk Amid Covid-19". Human Rights Watch. 6 May 2020.
  533. "Bangladesh: End Wave of COVID-19 'Rumor' Arrests". Human Rights Watch. 31 March 2020.
  534. "Morocco makes a dozen arrests over coronavirus fake news". Reuters. 19 March 2020.
  535. "Man arrested for spreading fake news on coronavirus". Pakistan Today. 25 March 2020.
  536. Al Sherbini R (22 April 2020). "Saudi man arrested for false news on COVID-19 patient". Gulf News.
  537. "Legal action against spreading fake news". Oman Observer. 21 March 2020.
  538. Weinthal B (15 April 2020). "Iran arrests ex-TV presenter for accusing regime of coronavirus cover-up". The Jerusalem Post.
  539. Whong E (13 April 2020). "Vietnam, Laos Arrest Facebookers on COVID-19-Related Charges". Radio Free Asia.
  540. Ganguly M (3 April 2020). "Sri Lanka Uses Pandemic to Curtail Free Expression". Human Rights Watch.
  541. York G (7 April 2020). "Arrests mount as Africa battles a destructive wave of COVID-19 disinformation". The Globe and Mail.
  542. "Authorities across West Africa attacking journalists covering COVID-19 pandemic". IFEX. 22 April 2020.
  543. Kajjo S (18 April 2020). "Somali Journalists Arrested, Intimidated While Covering COVID-19". VOA News.
  544. Budoo-Scholtz A (11 May 2020). "Controls to manage fake news in Africa are affecting freedom of expression". The Conversation.
  545. "Press freedom violations throughout Africa linked to Covid-19 coverage". Radio France Internationale. 14 April 2020.
  546. Peck G, Khunson PT (16 April 2020). "Some leaders use pandemic to sharpen tools against critics". ABC News.
  547. "Kazakh Opposition Activist Detained For 'Spreading False Information'". Human Rights Watch. 18 April 2020.
  548. "Azerbaijan: Crackdown on Critics Amid Pandemic". Human Rights Watch. 16 April 2020.
  549. Kajosevic S (26 March 2020). "Concern for Rights in Montenegro amid COVID-19 Fight". Balkan Insight.
  550. "Novinarka Ana Lalić puštena iz policije" [Journalist Ana Lalic released by police]. 2 April 2020.
  551. "Prosecution drops charges against Serbian journalist arrested at the beginning of April". European Western Balkans. 27 April 2020.
  552. "Malaysia Arrests Thousands Amid Coronavirus Lockdown". VOA News. 4 April 2020.
  553. Iau J (16 April 2020). "Civil servant arrested for leaking info on number of virus cases". The Straits Times.
  554. "Singapore's Fake News and Contempt Laws a Threat to Media, Journalists Say". VOA News. 6 May 2020.
  555. Tostevin M, Geddie J (4 February 2020). "Coronavirus sends Asia's social media censors into overdrive". Reuters.
  556. Hedges M (21 April 2020). "Gulf states use coronavirus threat to tighten authoritarian controls and surveillance". The Conversation.
  557. Ratcliffe R (1 April 2020). "Myanmar blocks hundreds of news sites and threatens editor with life in jail". The Guardian.
  558. "In mid-coronavirus crisis, Myanmar blocks 221 sites for "fake news"". Reporters Without Borders. 3 April 2020.
  559. ^ "Joe Rogan Experience #1757 – Dr. Robert Malone, MD Full Transcript". Congressman Troy Nehls. 3 January 2022. Archived from the original on 14 January 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  560. 2021 Congressional Record, Vol. 167, Page e1403 (3 January 2022)
  561. "YouTube takes down anti-vax Joe Rogan interview with Dr Robert Malone". news.com.au. 4 January 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  562. "UN health agency warns against coronavirus COVID-19 criminal scams". United Nations. 29 February 2020. Archived from the original on 8 March 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  563. "COVID-19 Consumer Warnings and Safety Tips". Federal Communications Commission. 31 March 2020. Retrieved 2 April 2020.
  564. "Coronavirus Advice for Consumers". Federal Trade Commission. 24 April 2020. Retrieved 14 September 2020.
  565. Morrison S (5 March 2020). "Coronavirus email scams are trying to cash in on your fear". vox.com. Archived from the original on 6 March 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  566. Griffin A (10 March 2020). "Coronavirus: Sinister people are knocking on doors claiming to be part of official disease response, police warn". The Independent. Archived from the original on 11 March 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  567. Witkowski W (15 March 2020). "Hackers are using coronavirus concerns to trick you, cybersecurity pros warn". MarketWatch. Archived from the original on 7 April 2020. Retrieved 7 April 2020.
  568. Fowler H, Duncan C (13 March 2020). "Hackers made their own coronavirus map to spread malware, feds warn". The Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 15 March 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2020.
  569. "Coronavirus stimulus payment scams: What you need to know". Federal Trade Commission. 20 April 2020. Retrieved 14 September 2020.
  570. "COVID-19: We're here for you". Wells Fargo. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  571. "COVID-19 Information" (PDF). LoanDepot. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  572. "Protect yourself from COVID-19 scams". Humana. Retrieved 3 August 2020.

External links

Library resources about
COVID-19 misinformation
COVID-19 pandemic
Timeline
Pre-pandemic
2020
2021
2022
2023
Locations
Africa
Northern
Eastern
Southern
Central
Western
Asia
Central/North
East
Mainland China
South
India
By location
Southeast
Malaysia
Philippines
West
Europe
United Kingdom
By location
Eastern
Western Balkans
European Union
EFTA countries
Microstates
North
America
Atlantic
Canada
Caribbean
Countries
British Overseas Territories
Caribbean Netherlands
French West Indies
US insular areas
Central America
United States
responses
By location
Oceania
Australia
New Zealand
South
America
Others
Impact
Culture and
entertainment
Arts and
cultural heritage
Education
By country
Sports
By country
By sport
Society
and rights
Social impact
Labor
Human rights
Legal
Minority
Religion
Economic
By country
By industry
Supply and trade
Financial markets
Information
Misinformation
Politics
Political impact
Protests
International relations
Language
Others
Health issues
Medical topics
Testing and
epidemiology
Apps
Prevention
Vaccines
Topics
Authorized
DNA
Inactivated
mRNA
Subunit
Viral vector
Virus-like particles
In trials
Attenuated
DNA
Inactivated
RNA
Subunit
Viral vector
Virus-like particles
Deployment
by location
Africa
Asia
Europe
North America
Oceania
South America
Others
Treatment
Monoclonal antibodies
Small molecule antivirals
Variants
Specific
General
Institutions
Hospitals and
medical clinics
Mainland China
Others
Organizations
Health
institutes
Pandemic
institutes
Relief funds
People
Medical
professionals
Researchers
Officials
WHO
By location
Others
List of deaths due to COVID-19
Data (templates)
Global
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Oceania
Others
Conspiracy theories
List of conspiracy theories
Overview
Core topics
Psychology
Astronomy and outer space
UFOs
Hoaxes
Deaths and disappearances
Assassination /
suicide theories
Accidents / disasters
Other cases
Body double hoax
Energy, environment

California drought manipulation

False flag allegations
Gender and sexuality
Health
Race, religion and/or ethnicity
Antisemitic
Christian / Anti-Christian
Islamophobic
Genocide denial /
Denial of mass killings
Regional
Asia
Americas
(outside the United States)
Middle East / North Africa
Russia
Turkey
Other European
United States
2020 election
Other
Pseudolaw
Satirical
See also
Disinformation and misinformation
Types
Books and documentaries
Examples
Health
Operations and events by country
CanadaJihadunspun.com
China
CzechoslovakiaOperation Neptune
Germany
India
IsraelTeam Jorge
KoreaVoluntary Agency Network of Korea
KuwaitFintas Group
MexicoPeñabots
Philippines
Russia /
Soviet Union
Soviet era
Post-Soviet era
South AfricaHIV/AIDS denialism
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
VenezuelaBolivarian Army of Trolls
Vietnam
Opposition
COVID-19 misinformation at Misplaced Pages's sister projects: Categories: