Misplaced Pages

C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Tribe of Okla)

2001 United States Supreme Court case
C & L Enterprises v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Okla.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued March 19, 2001
Decided April 30, 2001
Full case nameC & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
Citations532 U.S. 411 (more)121 S. Ct. 1589; 149 L. Ed. 2d 623
Case history
PriorUpheld tribal immunity, Okla. Civ. App., Div. 2, Feb. 8, 2000 (not reported)
Holding
Reversed and remanded. An Indian Tribe waives its sovereign immunity when it enters into a contract that provides for arbitration and being heard in a state court.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinion
MajorityGinsburg, joined by unanimous

C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, 532 U.S. 411 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the tribe waived its sovereign immunity when it agreed to a contract containing an arbitration agreement.

Background

In 1993, the Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma entered into a contract with C & L Enterprises, Inc. to install a roof on a tribally owned building that was not on reservation land. Prior to the work being performed under the contract, the Potawatomi decided to use a different type of roof, re-bid the job and selected another contractor to install the roof.

The contract used with C & L Enterprises was provided by the tribe and contained both an arbitration clause and a choice of law clause. C & L then sought to enforce the arbitration clause and the tribe claimed sovereign immunity. The arbitrator ruled in favor of C & L and C & L filed suit to enforce the judgment in the District Court of Oklahoma County.

The trial court denied the tribes motion to dismiss based upon sovereign immunity and the tribe appealed. The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals affirmed and the Oklahoma Supreme Court declined to review the case. It was next appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

During the time the case was pending, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Kiowa Tribe of Okla. v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. In view of that decision, the decision of the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals was vacated and the case remanded. On remand, the Court of Civil Appeals held that the Potawatomi did have sovereign immunity and C & L appealed.

Several other courts had held that an arbitration clause waived immunity, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the conflict.

Opinion of the Court

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the court, reversing and remanding.

An Indian tribe has sovereignty and is immune from suit in a state court unless that immunity has been specifically abrogated by the United States Congress or clearly waived by the tribe. In this case, the Potawatomie Tribe entered into a contract, using a contract form that the tribe provided, that agreed to arbitration and to having the dispute heard in state court. This is a clear waiver of the tribe's sovereign immunity.

References

  1. ^ C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, 532 U.S. 411 (2001).
  2. Kiowa Tribe of Okla. v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., 523 U.S. 751 (1998).

External links

U.S. Supreme Court Article III case law
Federalism
Abstention
Adequate and
independent state ground
Federal common law
Rooker–Feldman doctrine
Sovereign immunity and
presidential immunity
Jurisdiction
Justiciability
Mootness
Political question
Ripeness
Standing
Others
Treason
Others
Categories: