Misplaced Pages

Ceria based thermochemical cycles

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

A ceria based thermochemical cycle is a type of two-step thermochemical cycle that uses as oxygen carrier cerium oxides ( C e O 2 {\displaystyle CeO_{2}} / C e 2 O 3 {\displaystyle Ce_{2}O_{3}} ) for synthetic fuel production such as hydrogen or syngas. These cycles are able to obtain either hydrogen ( H 2 {\displaystyle H_{2}} ) from the splitting of water molecules ( H 2 O {\displaystyle H_{2}O} ), or also syngas, which is a mixture of hydrogen ( H 2 {\displaystyle H_{2}} ) and carbon monoxide ( C O {\displaystyle CO} ), by also splitting carbon dioxide ( C O 2 {\displaystyle CO_{2}} ) molecules alongside water molecules. These type of thermochemical cycles are mainly studied for concentrated solar applications.

Basic non-stoichiometric ceria cycle scheme. The sweep gas can be substituted by a vacuum pump.

Types of cycles

These cycles are based on the two step redox thermochemical cycle. In the first step, a metal oxide, such as ceria, is reduced by providing heat to the material, liberating oxygen. In the second step, a stream of steam oxidises the previously obtained molecule back to its starting state, therefore closing the cycle. Depending on the stoichiometry of the reactions, which is the relation of the reactants and products of the chemical reaction, these cycles can be classified in two categories.

Stoichiometric ceria cycle

Main article: Cerium(IV) oxide–cerium(III) oxide cycle

The stoichiometric ceria cycle uses the cerium(IV) oxide ( C e O 2 {\displaystyle CeO_{2}} ) and cerium(III) oxide ( C e 2 O 3 {\displaystyle Ce_{2}O_{3}} ) metal oxide pairs as oxygen carriers. This cycle is composed of two steps:

A reduction step, to liberate oxygen ( O 2 {\displaystyle O_{2}} ) from the material:

2 C e O 2 C e 2 O 3 + 1 2 O 2 {\displaystyle 2CeO_{2}\longrightarrow Ce_{2}O_{3}+{\frac {1}{2}}O_{2}}

And an oxidation step, to split the water molecules into hydrogen ( H 2 {\displaystyle H_{2}} ) and oxygen ( O 2 {\displaystyle O_{2}} ), and/or the carbon dioxide molecules ( C O 2 {\displaystyle CO_{2}} ) into carbon monoxide ( C O {\displaystyle CO} ) and oxygen ( O 2 {\displaystyle O_{2}} ):

  • The reaction for hydrogen production: C e 2 O 3 + H 2 O 2 C e O 2 + H 2 {\displaystyle Ce_{2}O_{3}+H_{2}O\rightarrow 2CeO_{2}+H_{2}}
  • The reaction for carbon monoxide production: C e 2 O 3 + C O 2 2 C e O 2 + C O {\displaystyle Ce_{2}O_{3}+CO_{2}\rightarrow 2CeO_{2}+CO}

The reduction step is an endothermic reaction that takes place at temperatures around 2,300 K (2,027 °C) in order to ensure a sufficient reduction. In order to enhance the reduction of the material, low partial pressures of oxygen are required. To obtain these low partial pressures, there are two main possibilities, either by vacuum pumping the reactor chamber, or by using an chemically inert sweep gas, such as nitrogen ( N 2 {\displaystyle N_{2}} ) or argon ( A r {\displaystyle Ar} ).

On the other hand, the oxidation step is an exothermic reaction that can take place at a considerable range of temperatures, from 400 °C up to 1,000 °C. In this case, depending on the fuel to be produced, a stream of steam, carbon dioxide or a mixture of both is introduced to the reaction chamber for hydrogen, carbon monoxide or syngas production respectively. The temperature difference between the two steps presents a challenge for heat recovery, since the existing solid to solid heat exchangers are not highly efficient.

The thermal energy required to achieve these high temperatures is provided by concentrated solar radiation. Due to the high concentration ratio required to achieve this high temperatures, the main technologies used are concentrating solar towers (CST) or parabolic dishes.

The main disadvantage of the stoichiometric ceria cycle lies in the fact that the reduction reaction temperature of cerium(IV) oxide ( C e O 2 {\displaystyle CeO_{2}} ) is at the same range of the melting temperature (1,687–2,230 °C) of cerium(IV) oxide ( C e 2 O 3 {\displaystyle Ce_{2}O_{3}} ), which in the end results in some melting and sublimation of the material, which can produce reactor failures such as deposition on the window or sintering of the particles.

Non-stoichiometric ceria cycle

The non-stoichiometric ceria cycle uses only cerium(IV) oxide, and instead of totally reducing it to the next oxidation molecule, it performs a partial reduction of it. The quantity of this reduction is commonly expressed as reduction extent and is indicated as δ {\displaystyle \delta } . In this way, by partially reducing ceria, oxygen vacancies are created in the material. The two steps are formulated as such:

Reduction reaction:

C e O 2 C e O 2 δ + δ 2 O 2 {\displaystyle CeO_{2}\rightarrow CeO_{2-\delta }+{\frac {\delta }{2}}O_{2}}

Oxidation reaction:

  • For hydrogen production: C e O 2 δ + δ H 2 O C e O 2 + δ H 2 {\displaystyle CeO_{2-\delta }+\delta H_{2}O\rightarrow CeO_{2}+\delta H_{2}}
  • For carbon monoxide production: C e O 2 δ + δ 2 C O 2 C e O 2 + δ 2 C O {\displaystyle CeO_{2-\delta }+{\frac {\delta }{2}}CO_{2}\rightarrow CeO_{2}+{\frac {\delta }{2}}CO}

The main advantage of this cycle is that the reduction temperature is lower, around 1,773 K (1,500 °C) which alleviates the high temperature demand of some materials and avoids certain problems such as sublimation or sintering. Temperatures above these would result in the reduction of the material to the next oxidation molecule, which should be avoided.

In order to reduce the thermal loses of the cycle, the temperature difference between the reduction and oxidation chambers need to be optimized. This results in partially oxidated states, rather than a full oxidation of the ceria. Due to this, the chemical reaction is commonly expressed considering these two reduction extents:

Reduction reaction:

C e O 2 δ o x C e O 2 δ r e d + Δ δ 2 O 2 {\displaystyle CeO_{2-\delta _{ox}}\rightarrow CeO_{2-\delta _{red}}+{\frac {\Delta \delta }{2}}O_{2}}

Oxidation reaction:

  • For hydrogen production: C e O 2 δ r e d + Δ δ H 2 O C e O 2 δ o x + Δ δ H 2 {\displaystyle CeO_{2-\delta _{red}}+\Delta \delta H_{2}O\rightarrow CeO_{2-\delta _{ox}}+\Delta \delta H_{2}}
  • For carbon monoxide production: C e O 2 δ r e d + Δ δ 2 C O 2 C e O 2 δ o x + Δ δ 2 C O {\displaystyle CeO_{2-\delta _{red}}+{\frac {\Delta \delta }{2}}CO_{2}\rightarrow CeO_{2-\delta _{ox}}+{\frac {\Delta \delta }{2}}CO}

The main disadvantage of these cycles is the low reduction extent, due to the low non-stoichiometry, hence leaving less vacancies for the oxidation process, which in the end translates to lower fuel production rates.

Due to the properties of ceria, other materials are being studied, mainly perovskites based on ceria, to improve the thermodynamic and chemical properties of the metal oxide.

Methane driven non-stoichiometric ceria cycle

Since the temperatures needed to achieve the reduction of the material are considerably high, the reduction of the cerium oxide can be enhanced by providing methane to the reaction. This reduces significantly the temperatures required to achieve the reduction of ceria, ranging between 800-1,000 °C, while also producing syngas in the reduction reactor. In this case, the reduction reaction goes as follows:

C e O 2 + δ C H 4 C e O 2 δ + δ C O + 2 δ H 2 {\displaystyle CeO_{2}+\delta CH_{4}\rightarrow CeO_{2-\delta }+\delta CO+2\delta H_{2}}

The main disadvantages of this cycle are the carbon deposition on the material, which eventually deactivates it after several cycles and needs to be replaced, and the acquisition of the methane feedstock.

Types of reactors

Depending on the type and topology of the reactors, the cycles will function either in continuous production or in batch production. There are two main types of reactors for these specific cycles:

Monolithic reactors

Monolithic ceria reactor for a methane driven cycle. The concentrated solar radiation enters to the cavity through the quartz window and heats the RPCs, triggering the reduction reaction when the temperature increases. In this case, methane enters the cavity through the inlet ports during the reduction.

These type of reactors consist on a piece of solid material, which is shaped as a reticulated porous foam (RPC) in other to increase both the surface area and the solar radiation penetration. This reactors are shaped as a cavity receivers, in order to reduce the thermal losses due to reradiation. They usually count with a quartz (fused silica) window in order to let the solar radiation inside the cavity.

Since the metal oxide is a solid structure, both reactions must be done in the same reactor, which leads to a discontinuous production process, carrying out one step after the other. To avoid this stops in the production time, multiple reactors can be arranged to approximate a continuous production process. This is usually referred as a batch process. The intention is to always have one or multiple reactors operating in the oxidation step at the same time, hence always generating hydrogen.

Some new reactor concepts are being studied, in which the RPCs can be moved from one reactor to another, in order to have one single reduction reactor.

Solid particles reactors

These type of reactors try to solve the discontinuity problem of the cycle by using solid particles of the metal oxide instead of having solid structures. This particles can be moved from the reduction reactor to the oxidation reactor, which allows a continuous production of fuel. Many types of reactors work with solid particles, from free falling receivers, to packed beds, fluidized beds or rotary kilns.

The main disadvantage of this approach is that, due to the high temperatures achieved, the solid particles are susceptible to sintering, which is a process in which small particles melt and get stuck to another particles, creating bigger particles, which reduces their surface area and difficult the transportation process.

See also

References

  1. ^ Le Gal, Alex; Julbe, Anne; Abanades, Stéphane (January 2023). "Thermochemical Activity of Single- and Dual-Phase Oxide Compounds Based on Ceria, Ferrites, and Perovskites for Two-Step Synthetic Fuel Production". Molecules. 28 (11): 4327. doi:10.3390/molecules28114327. ISSN 1420-3049. PMC 10254557. PMID 37298803.
  2. Furler, Philipp; Scheffe, Jonathan R.; Steinfeld, Aldo (2012). "Syngas production by simultaneous splitting of H2O and CO 2 via ceria redox reactions in a high-temperature solar reactor". Energy Environ. Sci. 5 (3): 6098–6103. doi:10.1039/C1EE02620H. ISSN 1754-5692.
  3. ^ Smestad, Greg P.; Steinfeld, Aldo (2012-09-19). "Review: Photochemical and Thermochemical Production of Solar Fuels from H 2 O and CO 2 Using Metal Oxide Catalysts". Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 51 (37): 11828–11840. doi:10.1021/ie3007962. ISSN 0888-5885.
  4. ^ Lu, Youjun; Zhu, Liya; Agrafiotis, Christos; Vieten, Josua; Roeb, Martin; Sattler, Christian (November 2019). "Solar fuels production: Two-step thermochemical cycles with cerium-based oxides". Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 75: 100785. Bibcode:2019PECS...7500785L. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2019.100785.
  5. ^ Abanades, Stéphane; Flamant, Gilles (December 2006). "Thermochemical hydrogen production from a two-step solar-driven water-splitting cycle based on cerium oxides". Solar Energy. 80 (12): 1611–1623. Bibcode:2006SoEn...80.1611A. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2005.12.005.
  6. Gokon, Nobuyuki; Sagawa, Sachi; Kodama, Tatsuya (November 2013). "Comparative study of activity of cerium oxide at thermal reduction temperatures of 1300–1550 °C for solar thermochemical two-step water-splitting cycle". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 38 (34): 14402–14414. Bibcode:2013IJHE...3814402G. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.108.
  7. Agrafiotis, Christos; Pein, Mathias; Giasafaki, Dimitra; Tescari, Stefania; Roeb, Martin; Sattler, Christian (2019-04-01). "Redox Oxides-Based Solar Thermochemistry and Its Materialization to Reactor/Heat Exchanger Concepts for Efficient Solar Energy Harvesting, Transformation and Storage". Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. 141 (2). doi:10.1115/1.4042226. ISSN 0199-6231.
  8. Brendelberger, Stefan; Holzemer-Zerhusen, Philipp; von Storch, Henrik; Sattler, Christian (2019-04-01). "Performance Assessment of a Heat Recovery System for Monolithic Receiver-Reactors". Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. 141 (2). doi:10.1115/1.4042241. ISSN 0199-6231.
  9. ^ Chueh, William C.; Falter, Christoph; Abbott, Mandy; Scipio, Danien; Furler, Philipp; Haile, Sossina M.; Steinfeld, Aldo (2010-12-24). "High-Flux Solar-Driven Thermochemical Dissociation of CO 2 and H 2 O Using Nonstoichiometric Ceria". Science. 330 (6012): 1797–1801. doi:10.1126/science.1197834. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 21205663.
  10. ^ Koepf, E.; Alxneit, I.; Wieckert, C.; Meier, A. (2017-02-15). "A review of high temperature solar driven reactor technology: 25 years of experience in research and development at the Paul Scherrer Institute". Applied Energy. 188: 620–651. Bibcode:2017ApEn..188..620K. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.088. ISSN 0306-2619.
  11. Scheffe, Jonathan R.; Steinfeld, Aldo (2012-03-15). "Thermodynamic Analysis of Cerium-Based Oxides for Solar Thermochemical Fuel Production". Energy & Fuels. 26 (3): 1928–1936. doi:10.1021/ef201875v. ISSN 0887-0624.
  12. Le Gal, Alex; Abanades, Stéphane (2012-06-28). "Dopant Incorporation in Ceria for Enhanced Water-Splitting Activity during Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen Generation". The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 116 (25): 13516–13523. doi:10.1021/jp302146c. ISSN 1932-7447.
  13. Krenzke, Peter T.; Davidson, Jane H. (2014-06-19). "Thermodynamic Analysis of Syngas Production via the Solar Thermochemical Cerium Oxide Redox Cycle with Methane-Driven Reduction". Energy & Fuels. 28 (6): 4088–4095. doi:10.1021/ef500610n. ISSN 0887-0624.
  14. Zuber, Mario; Patriarca, Moritz; Ackermann, Simon; Furler, Philipp; Conceição, Ricardo; Gonzalez-Aguilar, José; Romero, Manuel; Steinfeld, Aldo (2023-04-11). "Methane dry reforming via a ceria-based redox cycle in a concentrating solar tower". Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 7 (8): 1804–1817. doi:10.1039/D2SE01726A. hdl:20.500.11850/602753. ISSN 2398-4902.
  15. Cho, H.S.; Gokon, N.; Kodama, T.; Kang, Y.H.; Lee, H.J. (January 2015). "Improved operation of solar reactor for two-step water-splitting H 2 production by ceria-coated ceramic foam device". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 40 (1): 114–124. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.084.
  16. Takacs, M.; Ackermann, S.; Bonk, A.; Neises-von Puttkamer, M.; Haueter, Ph.; Scheffe, J. R.; Vogt, U. F.; Steinfeld, A. (April 2017). "Splitting CO 2 with a ceria-based redox cycle in a solar-driven thermogravimetric analyzer". AIChE Journal. 63 (4): 1263–1271. Bibcode:2017AIChE..63.1263T. doi:10.1002/aic.15501. ISSN 0001-1541. PMC 5367271. PMID 28405030.
  17. Lorentzou, Souzana; Zygogianni, Alexandra; Pagkoura, Chrysoula; Karagiannakis, George; Konstandopoulos, Athanasios G.; Saeck, Jan Peter; Breuer, Stefan; Lange, Matthias; Lapp, Justin; Fend, Thomas; Roeb, Martin; Gonzalez, Aurelio Jose; Delgado, Alfonso Vidal; Brouwer, Jan Peter; Makkus, Robert C. (2018). "HYDROSOL-PLANT: Structured redox reactors for H2 production from solar thermochemical H2O splitting". SolarPACES. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2033: 130010. doi:10.1063/1.5067144.
  18. Schäppi, Remo; Hüsler, Vivien; Steinfeld, Aldo (2024-02-28). "Solar Thermochemical Production of Syngas from H 2 O and CO 2 ─Experimental Parametric Study, Control, and Automation". Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 63 (8): 3563–3575. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.3c03044. hdl:20.500.11850/660384. ISSN 0888-5885.
  19. Brendelberger, Stefan; Holzemer-Zerhusen, Philipp; Vega Puga, Estefania; Roeb, Martin; Sattler, Christian (March 2022). "Study of a new receiver-reactor cavity system with multiple mobile redox units for solar thermochemical water splitting". Solar Energy. 235: 118–128. Bibcode:2022SoEn..235..118B. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2022.02.013. ISSN 0038-092X.
  20. Kodama, T.; Gokon, N.; Matsubara, K.; Yoshida, K.; Koikari, S.; Nagase, Y.; Nakamura, K. (2014). "Flux Measurement of a New Beam-down Solar Concentrating System in Miyazaki for Demonstration of Thermochemical Water Splitting Reactors". Energy Procedia. 49: 1990–1998. Bibcode:2014EnPro..49.1990K. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.211. ISSN 1876-6102.
  21. Etori, T.; Gokon, N.; Takeuchi, A.; Miki, T.; Yokota, M.; Kodama, T. (May 2015). "Flowability Control of Bed Materials in a Fluidized Bed Reactor for Solar Thermochemical Process". Energy Procedia. 69: 1741–1749. Bibcode:2015EnPro..69.1741E. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.143. ISSN 1876-6102.
  22. Milanese, Marco; Colangelo, Gianpiero; Iacobazzi, Fabrizio; de Risi, Arturo (February 2017). "Modeling of double-loop fluidized bed solar reactor for efficient thermochemical fuel production". Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 160: 174–181. Bibcode:2017SEMSC.160..174M. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.028.
  23. Arribas, Lucía; González-Aguilar, José; Romero, Manuel (2018-09-15). "Solar-Driven Thermochemical Water-Splitting by Cerium Oxide: Determination of Operational Conditions in a Directly Irradiated Fixed Bed Reactor". Energies. 11 (9): 2451. doi:10.3390/en11092451. ISSN 1996-1073.

External links

Categories: