Misplaced Pages

Choquet integral

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Choquet expected utility)

A Choquet integral is a subadditive or superadditive integral created by the French mathematician Gustave Choquet in 1953. It was initially used in statistical mechanics and potential theory, but found its way into decision theory in the 1980s, where it is used as a way of measuring the expected utility of an uncertain event. It is applied specifically to membership functions and capacities. In imprecise probability theory, the Choquet integral is also used to calculate the lower expectation induced by a 2-monotone lower probability, or the upper expectation induced by a 2-alternating upper probability.

Using the Choquet integral to denote the expected utility of belief functions measured with capacities is a way to reconcile the Ellsberg paradox and the Allais paradox.

Definition

The following notation is used:

  • S {\displaystyle S} – a set.
  • F {\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}} – a collection of subsets of S {\displaystyle S} .
  • f : S → R {\displaystyle f:S\to \mathbb {R} } – a function.
  • ν : F → R + {\displaystyle \nu :{\mathcal {F}}\to \mathbb {R} ^{+}} – a monotone set function.

Assume that f {\displaystyle f} is measurable with respect to F {\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}} , that is

∀ x ∈ R : { s ∈ S ∣ f ( s ) ≥ x } ∈ F {\displaystyle \forall x\in \mathbb {R} \colon \{s\in S\mid f(s)\geq x\}\in {\mathcal {F}}}

Then the Choquet integral of f {\displaystyle f} with respect to ν {\displaystyle \nu } is defined by:

( C ) ∫ f d ν := ∫ − ∞ 0 ( ν ( { s | f ( s ) ≥ x } ) − ν ( S ) ) d x + ∫ 0 ∞ ν ( { s | f ( s ) ≥ x } ) d x {\displaystyle (C)\int fd\nu :=\int _{-\infty }^{0}(\nu (\{s|f(s)\geq x\})-\nu (S))\,dx+\int _{0}^{\infty }\nu (\{s|f(s)\geq x\})\,dx}

where the integrals on the right-hand side are the usual Riemann integral (the integrands are integrable because they are monotone in x {\displaystyle x} ).

Properties

In general the Choquet integral does not satisfy additivity. More specifically, if ν {\displaystyle \nu } is not a probability measure, it may hold that

∫ f d ν + ∫ g d ν ≠ ∫ ( f + g ) d ν . {\displaystyle \int f\,d\nu +\int g\,d\nu \neq \int (f+g)\,d\nu .}

for some functions f {\displaystyle f} and g {\displaystyle g} .

The Choquet integral does satisfy the following properties.

Monotonicity

If f ≤ g {\displaystyle f\leq g} then

( C ) ∫ f d ν ≤ ( C ) ∫ g d ν {\displaystyle (C)\int f\,d\nu \leq (C)\int g\,d\nu }

Positive homogeneity

For all λ ≥ 0 {\displaystyle \lambda \geq 0} it holds that

( C ) ∫ λ f d ν = λ ( C ) ∫ f d ν , {\displaystyle (C)\int \lambda f\,d\nu =\lambda (C)\int f\,d\nu ,}

Comonotone additivity

If f , g : S → R {\displaystyle f,g:S\rightarrow \mathbb {R} } are comonotone functions, that is, if for all s , s ′ ∈ S {\displaystyle s,s'\in S} it holds that

( f ( s ) − f ( s ′ ) ) ( g ( s ) − g ( s ′ ) ) ≥ 0 {\displaystyle (f(s)-f(s'))(g(s)-g(s'))\geq 0} .
which can be thought of as f {\displaystyle f} and g {\displaystyle g} rising and falling together

then

( C ) ∫ f d ν + ( C ) ∫ g d ν = ( C ) ∫ ( f + g ) d ν . {\displaystyle (C)\int \,fd\nu +(C)\int g\,d\nu =(C)\int (f+g)\,d\nu .}

Subadditivity

If ν {\displaystyle \nu } is 2-alternating, then

( C ) ∫ f d ν + ( C ) ∫ g d ν ≥ ( C ) ∫ ( f + g ) d ν . {\displaystyle (C)\int \,fd\nu +(C)\int g\,d\nu \geq (C)\int (f+g)\,d\nu .}

Superadditivity

If ν {\displaystyle \nu } is 2-monotone, then

( C ) ∫ f d ν + ( C ) ∫ g d ν ≤ ( C ) ∫ ( f + g ) d ν . {\displaystyle (C)\int \,fd\nu +(C)\int g\,d\nu \leq (C)\int (f+g)\,d\nu .}

Alternative representation

Let G {\displaystyle G} denote a cumulative distribution function such that G − 1 {\displaystyle G^{-1}} is d H {\displaystyle dH} integrable. Then this following formula is often referred to as Choquet Integral:

∫ − ∞ ∞ G − 1 ( α ) d H ( α ) = − ∫ − ∞ a H ( G ( x ) ) d x + ∫ a ∞ H ^ ( 1 − G ( x ) ) d x , {\displaystyle \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }G^{-1}(\alpha )dH(\alpha )=-\int _{-\infty }^{a}H(G(x))dx+\int _{a}^{\infty }{\hat {H}}(1-G(x))dx,}

where H ^ ( x ) = H ( 1 ) − H ( 1 − x ) {\displaystyle {\hat {H}}(x)=H(1)-H(1-x)} .

  • choose H ( x ) := x {\displaystyle H(x):=x} to get ∫ 0 1 G − 1 ( x ) d x = E [ X ] {\displaystyle \int _{0}^{1}G^{-1}(x)dx=E} ,
  • choose H ( x ) := 1 [ α , x ] {\displaystyle H(x):=1_{}} to get ∫ 0 1 G − 1 ( x ) d H ( x ) = G − 1 ( α ) {\displaystyle \int _{0}^{1}G^{-1}(x)dH(x)=G^{-1}(\alpha )}

Applications

The Choquet integral was applied in image processing, video processing and computer vision. In behavioral decision theory, Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman use the Choquet integral and related methods in their formulation of cumulative prospect theory.

See also

Notes

  1. Choquet, G. (1953). "Theory of capacities". Annales de l'Institut Fourier. 5: 131–295. doi:10.5802/aif.53.
  2. Denneberg, D. (1994). Non-additive measure and Integral. Kluwer Academic. ISBN 0-7923-2840-X.
  3. Grabisch, M. (1996). "The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making". European Journal of Operational Research. 89 (3): 445–456. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00176-X.
  4. Chateauneuf, A.; Cohen, M. D. (2010). "Cardinal Extensions of the EU Model Based on the Choquet Integral". In Bouyssou, Denis; Dubois, Didier; Pirlot, Marc; Prade, Henri (eds.). Decision-making Process: Concepts and Methods. pp. 401–433. doi:10.1002/9780470611876.ch10. ISBN 9780470611876.
  5. Sriboonchita, S.; Wong, W. K.; Dhompongsa, S.; Nguyen, H. T. (2010). Stochastic dominance and applications to finance, risk and economics. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4200-8266-1.
  6. Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D. (1992). "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty". Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 5 (4): 297–323. doi:10.1007/bf00122574. S2CID 8456150.

Further reading

Categories: