Misplaced Pages

Chow's lemma

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Not to be confused with Chow's theorem.

Chow's lemma, named after Wei-Liang Chow, is one of the foundational results in algebraic geometry. It roughly says that a proper morphism is fairly close to being a projective morphism. More precisely, a version of it states the following:

If X {\displaystyle X} is a scheme that is proper over a noetherian base S {\displaystyle S} , then there exists a projective S {\displaystyle S} -scheme X {\displaystyle X'} and a surjective S {\displaystyle S} -morphism f : X X {\displaystyle f:X'\to X} that induces an isomorphism f 1 ( U ) U {\displaystyle f^{-1}(U)\simeq U} for some dense open U X . {\displaystyle U\subseteq X.}

Proof

The proof here is a standard one.

Reduction to the case of X {\displaystyle X} irreducible

We can first reduce to the case where X {\displaystyle X} is irreducible. To start, X {\displaystyle X} is noetherian since it is of finite type over a noetherian base. Therefore it has finitely many irreducible components X i {\displaystyle X_{i}} , and we claim that for each X i {\displaystyle X_{i}} there is an irreducible proper S {\displaystyle S} -scheme Y i {\displaystyle Y_{i}} so that Y i X {\displaystyle Y_{i}\to X} has set-theoretic image X i {\displaystyle X_{i}} and is an isomorphism on the open dense subset X i j i X j {\displaystyle X_{i}\setminus \cup _{j\neq i}X_{j}} of X i {\displaystyle X_{i}} . To see this, define Y i {\displaystyle Y_{i}} to be the scheme-theoretic image of the open immersion

X j i X j X . {\displaystyle X\setminus \cup _{j\neq i}X_{j}\to X.}

Since X j i X j {\displaystyle X\setminus \cup _{j\neq i}X_{j}} is set-theoretically noetherian for each i {\displaystyle i} , the map X j i X j X {\displaystyle X\setminus \cup _{j\neq i}X_{j}\to X} is quasi-compact and we may compute this scheme-theoretic image affine-locally on X {\displaystyle X} , immediately proving the two claims. If we can produce for each Y i {\displaystyle Y_{i}} a projective S {\displaystyle S} -scheme Y i {\displaystyle Y_{i}'} as in the statement of the theorem, then we can take X {\displaystyle X'} to be the disjoint union Y i {\displaystyle \coprod Y_{i}'} and f {\displaystyle f} to be the composition Y i Y i X {\displaystyle \coprod Y_{i}'\to \coprod Y_{i}\to X} : this map is projective, and an isomorphism over a dense open set of X {\displaystyle X} , while Y i {\displaystyle \coprod Y_{i}'} is a projective S {\displaystyle S} -scheme since it is a finite union of projective S {\displaystyle S} -schemes. Since each Y i {\displaystyle Y_{i}} is proper over S {\displaystyle S} , we've completed the reduction to the case X {\displaystyle X} irreducible.

X {\displaystyle X} can be covered by finitely many quasi-projective S {\displaystyle S} -schemes

Next, we will show that X {\displaystyle X} can be covered by a finite number of open subsets U i {\displaystyle U_{i}} so that each U i {\displaystyle U_{i}} is quasi-projective over S {\displaystyle S} . To do this, we may by quasi-compactness first cover S {\displaystyle S} by finitely many affine opens S j {\displaystyle S_{j}} , and then cover the preimage of each S j {\displaystyle S_{j}} in X {\displaystyle X} by finitely many affine opens X j k {\displaystyle X_{jk}} each with a closed immersion in to A S j n {\displaystyle \mathbb {A} _{S_{j}}^{n}} since X S {\displaystyle X\to S} is of finite type and therefore quasi-compact. Composing this map with the open immersions A S j n P S j n {\displaystyle \mathbb {A} _{S_{j}}^{n}\to \mathbb {P} _{S_{j}}^{n}} and P S j n P S n {\displaystyle \mathbb {P} _{S_{j}}^{n}\to \mathbb {P} _{S}^{n}} , we see that each X i j {\displaystyle X_{ij}} is a closed subscheme of an open subscheme of P S n {\displaystyle \mathbb {P} _{S}^{n}} . As P S n {\displaystyle \mathbb {P} _{S}^{n}} is noetherian, every closed subscheme of an open subscheme is also an open subscheme of a closed subscheme, and therefore each X i j {\displaystyle X_{ij}} is quasi-projective over S {\displaystyle S} .

Construction of X {\displaystyle X'} and f : X X {\displaystyle f:X'\to X}

Now suppose { U i } {\displaystyle \{U_{i}\}} is a finite open cover of X {\displaystyle X} by quasi-projective S {\displaystyle S} -schemes, with ϕ i : U i P i {\displaystyle \phi _{i}:U_{i}\to P_{i}} an open immersion in to a projective S {\displaystyle S} -scheme. Set U = i U i {\displaystyle U=\cap _{i}U_{i}} , which is nonempty as X {\displaystyle X} is irreducible. The restrictions of the ϕ i {\displaystyle \phi _{i}} to U {\displaystyle U} define a morphism

ϕ : U P = P 1 × S × S P n {\displaystyle \phi :U\to P=P_{1}\times _{S}\cdots \times _{S}P_{n}}

so that U U i P i = U ϕ P p i P i {\displaystyle U\to U_{i}\to P_{i}=U{\stackrel {\phi }{\to }}P{\stackrel {p_{i}}{\to }}P_{i}} , where U U i {\displaystyle U\to U_{i}} is the canonical injection and p i : P P i {\displaystyle p_{i}:P\to P_{i}} is the projection. Letting j : U X {\displaystyle j:U\to X} denote the canonical open immersion, we define ψ = ( j , ϕ ) S : U X × S P {\displaystyle \psi =(j,\phi )_{S}:U\to X\times _{S}P} , which we claim is an immersion. To see this, note that this morphism can be factored as the graph morphism U U × S P {\displaystyle U\to U\times _{S}P} (which is a closed immersion as P S {\displaystyle P\to S} is separated) followed by the open immersion U × S P X × S P {\displaystyle U\times _{S}P\to X\times _{S}P} ; as X × S P {\displaystyle X\times _{S}P} is noetherian, we can apply the same logic as before to see that we can swap the order of the open and closed immersions.

Now let X {\displaystyle X'} be the scheme-theoretic image of ψ {\displaystyle \psi } , and factor ψ {\displaystyle \psi } as

ψ : U ψ X h X × S P {\displaystyle \psi :U{\stackrel {\psi '}{\to }}X'{\stackrel {h}{\to }}X\times _{S}P}

where ψ {\displaystyle \psi '} is an open immersion and h {\displaystyle h} is a closed immersion. Let q 1 : X × S P X {\displaystyle q_{1}:X\times _{S}P\to X} and q 2 : X × S P P {\displaystyle q_{2}:X\times _{S}P\to P} be the canonical projections. Set

f : X h X × S P q 1 X , {\displaystyle f:X'{\stackrel {h}{\to }}X\times _{S}P{\stackrel {q_{1}}{\to }}X,}
g : X h X × S P q 2 P . {\displaystyle g:X'{\stackrel {h}{\to }}X\times _{S}P{\stackrel {q_{2}}{\to }}P.}

We will show that X {\displaystyle X'} and f {\displaystyle f} satisfy the conclusion of the theorem.

Verification of the claimed properties of X {\displaystyle X'} and f {\displaystyle f}

To show f {\displaystyle f} is surjective, we first note that it is proper and therefore closed. As its image contains the dense open set U X {\displaystyle U\subset X} , we see that f {\displaystyle f} must be surjective. It is also straightforward to see that f {\displaystyle f} induces an isomorphism on U {\displaystyle U} : we may just combine the facts that f 1 ( U ) = h 1 ( U × S P ) {\displaystyle f^{-1}(U)=h^{-1}(U\times _{S}P)} and ψ {\displaystyle \psi } is an isomorphism on to its image, as ψ {\displaystyle \psi } factors as the composition of a closed immersion followed by an open immersion U U × S P X × S P {\displaystyle U\to U\times _{S}P\to X\times _{S}P} . It remains to show that X {\displaystyle X'} is projective over S {\displaystyle S} .

We will do this by showing that g : X P {\displaystyle g:X'\to P} is an immersion. We define the following four families of open subschemes:

V i = ϕ i ( U i ) P i {\displaystyle V_{i}=\phi _{i}(U_{i})\subset P_{i}}
W i = p i 1 ( V i ) P {\displaystyle W_{i}=p_{i}^{-1}(V_{i})\subset P}
U i = f 1 ( U i ) X {\displaystyle U_{i}'=f^{-1}(U_{i})\subset X'}
U i = g 1 ( W i ) X . {\displaystyle U_{i}''=g^{-1}(W_{i})\subset X'.}

As the U i {\displaystyle U_{i}} cover X {\displaystyle X} , the U i {\displaystyle U_{i}'} cover X {\displaystyle X'} , and we wish to show that the U i {\displaystyle U_{i}''} also cover X {\displaystyle X'} . We will do this by showing that U i U i {\displaystyle U_{i}'\subset U_{i}''} for all i {\displaystyle i} . It suffices to show that p i g | U i : U i P i {\displaystyle p_{i}\circ g|_{U_{i}'}:U_{i}'\to P_{i}} is equal to ϕ i f | U i : U i P i {\displaystyle \phi _{i}\circ f|_{U_{i}'}:U_{i}'\to P_{i}} as a map of topological spaces. Replacing U i {\displaystyle U_{i}'} by its reduction, which has the same underlying topological space, we have that the two morphisms ( U i ) r e d P i {\displaystyle (U_{i}')_{red}\to P_{i}} are both extensions of the underlying map of topological space U U i P i {\displaystyle U\to U_{i}\to P_{i}} , so by the reduced-to-separated lemma they must be equal as U {\displaystyle U} is topologically dense in U i {\displaystyle U_{i}} . Therefore U i U i {\displaystyle U_{i}'\subset U_{i}''} for all i {\displaystyle i} and the claim is proven.

The upshot is that the W i {\displaystyle W_{i}} cover g ( X ) {\displaystyle g(X')} , and we can check that g {\displaystyle g} is an immersion by checking that g | U i : U i W i {\displaystyle g|_{U_{i}''}:U_{i}''\to W_{i}} is an immersion for all i {\displaystyle i} . For this, consider the morphism

u i : W i p i V i ϕ i 1 U i X . {\displaystyle u_{i}:W_{i}{\stackrel {p_{i}}{\to }}V_{i}{\stackrel {\phi _{i}^{-1}}{\to }}U_{i}\to X.}

Since X S {\displaystyle X\to S} is separated, the graph morphism Γ u i : W i X × S W i {\displaystyle \Gamma _{u_{i}}:W_{i}\to X\times _{S}W_{i}} is a closed immersion and the graph T i = Γ u i ( W i ) {\displaystyle T_{i}=\Gamma _{u_{i}}(W_{i})} is a closed subscheme of X × S W i {\displaystyle X\times _{S}W_{i}} ; if we show that U X × S W i {\displaystyle U\to X\times _{S}W_{i}} factors through this graph (where we consider U X {\displaystyle U\subset X'} via our observation that f {\displaystyle f} is an isomorphism over f 1 ( U ) {\displaystyle f^{-1}(U)} from earlier), then the map from U i {\displaystyle U_{i}''} must also factor through this graph by construction of the scheme-theoretic image. Since the restriction of q 2 {\displaystyle q_{2}} to T i {\displaystyle T_{i}} is an isomorphism onto W i {\displaystyle W_{i}} , the restriction of g {\displaystyle g} to U i {\displaystyle U_{i}''} will be an immersion into W i {\displaystyle W_{i}} , and our claim will be proven. Let v i {\displaystyle v_{i}} be the canonical injection U X X × S W i {\displaystyle U\subset X'\to X\times _{S}W_{i}} ; we have to show that there is a morphism w i : U X W i {\displaystyle w_{i}:U\subset X'\to W_{i}} so that v i = Γ u i w i {\displaystyle v_{i}=\Gamma _{u_{i}}\circ w_{i}} . By the definition of the fiber product, it suffices to prove that q 1 v i = u i q 2 v i {\displaystyle q_{1}\circ v_{i}=u_{i}\circ q_{2}\circ v_{i}} , or by identifying U X {\displaystyle U\subset X} and U X {\displaystyle U\subset X'} , that q 1 ψ = u i q 2 ψ {\displaystyle q_{1}\circ \psi =u_{i}\circ q_{2}\circ \psi } . But q 1 ψ = j {\displaystyle q_{1}\circ \psi =j} and q 2 ψ = ϕ {\displaystyle q_{2}\circ \psi =\phi } , so the desired conclusion follows from the definition of ϕ : U P {\displaystyle \phi :U\to P} and g {\displaystyle g} is an immersion. Since X S {\displaystyle X'\to S} is proper, any S {\displaystyle S} -morphism out of X {\displaystyle X'} is closed, and thus g : X P {\displaystyle g:X'\to P} is a closed immersion, so X {\displaystyle X'} is projective. {\displaystyle \blacksquare }

Additional statements

In the statement of Chow's lemma, if X {\displaystyle X} is reduced, irreducible, or integral, we can assume that the same holds for X {\displaystyle X'} . If both X {\displaystyle X} and X {\displaystyle X'} are irreducible, then f : X X {\displaystyle f:X'\to X} is a birational morphism.

References

  1. Hartshorne 1977, Ch II. Exercise 4.10.
  2. Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1961, 5.6.1.
  3. Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1961, 5.6.

Bibliography

Categories: