Misplaced Pages

UAS groups of the United States military

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Class I UAV) Classifications of unmanned aerial systems

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) classifies unmanned aerial systems (UAS) into "Groups" according to their size and capability, a joint system that replaced the service branches' separate categorization schemes in 2011.

The "Group" system has five categories, whose capabilities increase with the number.

Group Maximum weight
(lb) (MGTOW)		 Nominal operating
altitude (ft)		 Speed (kn) Examples
1 0–20 < 1,200 AGL 100 RQ-11 Raven, WASP, Puma
2 21–55 < 3,500 AGL < 250 ScanEagle, Flexrotor, SIC5, PDW C100
3 < 1,320 < FL 180 Shield AI V-BAT, RQ-7B Shadow, RQ-21 Blackjack, Navmar RQ-23 Tigershark, Arcturus-UAV Jump 20, Arcturus T-20, SIC25, Resolute ISR Resolute Eagle, Vanilla Unmanned
4 > 1,320 Any MQ-8B Fire Scout, MQ-1A/B Predator, MQ-1C Gray Eagle
5 > FL 180 MQ-9 Reaper, RQ-4 Global Hawk, MQ-4C Triton, Skydweller Aero (former Solar Impulse airframe)

Earlier categorization schemes

Tier systems

From about 2004 to 2011, U.S. military planners used various "Tier systems" to designate the various elements in an overall plan for integrated operations. The Tiers do not refer to specific models of aircraft, but rather roles the aircraft would fill. The U.S. Air Force, U.S. Marine Corps, and U.S. Army each have their own tier system.

U.S. Air Force tiers

  • Tier N/A: Small/Micro UAV. Role filled by BATMAV (Wasp Block III).
  • Tier I: Low altitude, long endurance. Role filled by the Gnat 750.
  • Tier II: Medium altitude, long endurance (MALE). Role currently filled by the Predator and MQ-9 Reaper.
  • Tier II+: High altitude, long endurance conventional UAV (or HALE UAV). Altitude: 60,000 to 65,000 feet (19,800 m), less than 300 knots (560 km/h) airspeed, 3,000-nautical-mile (6,000 km) radius, 24‑hour time-on-station capability. Complementary to the Tier III- aircraft. Role currently filled by the RQ-4 Global Hawk.
  • Tier III-: High altitude, long endurance low-observable UAV. Same parameters as, and complementary to, the Tier II+ aircraft. The RQ-3 DarkStar was originally intended to fulfill this role before it was "terminated". Role now filled by RQ-170 Sentinel.

U.S. Marine Corps tiers

  • Tier N/A: Micro UAV. Wasp III fills this role, driven largely by the desire for commonality with the USAF BATMAV.
  • Tier I: Role currently filled by the Dragon Eye but all ongoing and future procurement for the Dragon Eye program is going now to the RQ-11B Raven B.
  • Tier II: Role currently filled by the Scan Eagle and the AAI RQ-7 Shadow.
  • Tier III: For two decades, the role of medium range tactical UAV was filled by the Pioneer UAV. In July 2007, the Marine Corps announced its intention to retire the aging Pioneer fleet and transition to the RQ-7 Shadow tactical unmanned aircraft system by AAI Corporation. The first Marine Shadow systems have already been delivered, and training for their respective Marine Corps units is underway.

Role currently filled by the AAI RQ-7 Shadow, although USMC planners do not view this aircraft as meeting future Tier III requirements.

U.S. Army tiers

Future Combat Systems (Cancelled)

Main article: FCS/BCT unmanned aerial vehicles

UAS were grouped in four classes under the Future Combat Systems, which was the Army's principal modernization program from 2003 to early 2009:

  • Class I: For small units. Role to be filled by all new UAV with some similarity to Micro Air Vehicle.
  • Class II: For companies (cancelled).
  • Class III: For battalions (cancelled).
  • Class IV: For brigades. Role to be filled by the RQ-8A/B / MQ-8B Fire Scout.

References

  1. Department of Defense. "Unmanned Aircraft System Airspace Integration Plan" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-01-21. Retrieved 2015-08-06. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. U.S. Army. ""U.S. Army Roadmap for UAS 2010-2035"" (PDF). Retrieved 2015-08-06. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. "Joint Unmanned Aircraft Systems Minimum Training Standards" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-06. Retrieved 2015-08-06. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ Department of Defense. "Unmanned Aircraft System Airspace Integration Plan" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-01-21. Retrieved 2015-08-06. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. ^ "MCCDC, MCSC - Coordinated UAV Endorsement Brief". Archived from the original on June 25, 2008. Retrieved August 8, 2008.
  6. Office of the United States Secretary of Defense. "UAV Roadmap 2005–2030" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-08-24. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  8. "Unmanned Aerial Vehicles". Archived from the original on January 11, 2012. Retrieved January 12, 2012.
  9. Comparison of USAF Tier II, II+ and III- systems Archived August 19, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  10. USAF Tier system Archived May 14, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  12. "AeroVironment, Inc.: AV Press: United States Marine Corps Awards AeroVironment $19.3 Million BATMAV Contract for Wasp III Micro Unmanned Aircraft Systems". Archived from the original on December 8, 2008. Retrieved March 19, 2015.
  13. "Navy League of the United States - Citizens in Support of the Sea Services". Archived from the original on February 7, 2012. Retrieved August 8, 2008.
  14. USMC RQ-7 Shadow Homepage
  15. ^ "Defense Tech: FCS Watch Archives". Archived from the original on August 11, 2007. Retrieved August 24, 2007.
Categories: