Misplaced Pages

This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (March 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Nuclear physics
Nucleus Nucleons p n Nuclear matter Nuclear force Nuclear structure Nuclear reaction
Models of the nucleus Liquid drop Nuclear shell model Interacting boson model Ab initio
Nuclides' classification Isotopes – equal Z Isobars – equal A Isotones – equal N Isodiaphers – equal N − Z Isomers – equal all the above Mirror nuclei – Z ↔ N Stable Magic Even/odd Halo Borromean
Nuclear stability Binding energy p–n ratio Drip line Island of stability Valley of stability Stable nuclide
Radioactive decay Alpha α Beta β 2β 0v β K/L capture Isomeric Gamma γ Internal conversion Spontaneous fission Cluster decay Neutron emission Proton emission Decay energy Decay chain Decay product Radiogenic nuclide
Nuclear fission Spontaneous Products pair breaking Photofission
Capturing processes electron 2× neutron s r proton p rp
High-energy processes Spallation by cosmic ray Photodisintegration
Nucleosynthesis and nuclear astrophysics Nuclear fusion Processes: Stellar Big Bang Supernova Nuclides: Primordial Cosmogenic Artificial
High-energy nuclear physics Quark–gluon plasma RHIC LHC
Scientists Alvarez Becquerel Bethe A. Bohr N. Bohr Chadwick Cockcroft Ir. Curie Fr. Curie Pi. Curie Skłodowska-Curie Davisson Fermi Hahn Jensen Lawrence Mayer Meitner Oliphant Oppenheimer Proca Purcell Rabi Rutherford Soddy Strassmann Świątecki Szilárd Teller Thomson Walton Wigner
Physics portal  Category
v t e

Cluster decay, also named heavy particle radioactivity, heavy ion radioactivity or heavy cluster decay, is a rare type of nuclear decay in which an atomic nucleus emits a small "cluster" of neutrons and protons, more than in an alpha particle, but less than a typical binary fission fragment. Ternary fission into three fragments also produces products in the cluster size.

Description

The loss of protons from the parent nucleus changes it to the nucleus of a different element, the daughter, with a mass number A_d = A − A_e and atomic number Z_d = Z − Z_e, where A_e = N_e + Z_e. For example:

₈₈Ra
→
₆C
+
₈₂Pb

According to "Ronen's golden rule" of cluster decay, the emitted nucleus tends to be one with a high binding energy per nucleon, and especially one with a magic number of nucleon.

This type of rare decay mode was observed in radioisotopes that decay predominantly by alpha emission, and it occurs only in a small percentage of the decays for all such isotopes.

The branching ratio with respect to alpha decay is rather small (see the Table below).

${\displaystyle B=T_{a}/T_{c}}$

T_a and T_c are the half-lives of the parent nucleus relative to alpha decay and cluster radioactivity, respectively.

Cluster decay, like alpha decay, is a quantum tunneling process: in order to be emitted, the cluster must penetrate a potential barrier. This is a different process than the more random nuclear disintegration that precedes light fragment emission in ternary fission, which may be a result of a nuclear reaction, but can also be a type of spontaneous radioactive decay in certain nuclides, demonstrating that input energy is not necessarily needed for fission, which remains a fundamentally different process mechanistically.

In the absence of any energy loss for fragment deformation and excitation, as in cold fission phenomena or in alpha decay, the total kinetic energy is equal to the Q-value and is divided between the particles in inverse proportion with their masses, as required by conservation of linear momentum

${\displaystyle E_{k}=QA_{d}/A}$

where A_d is the mass number of the daughter, A_d = A − A_e.

Cluster decay exists in an intermediate position between alpha decay (in which a nucleus spits out a He nucleus), and spontaneous fission, in which a heavy nucleus splits into two (or more) large fragments and an assorted number of neutrons. Spontaneous fission ends up with a probabilistic distribution of daughter products, which sets it apart from cluster decay. In cluster decay for a given radioisotope, the emitted particle is a light nucleus and the decay method always emits this same particle. For heavier emitted clusters, there is otherwise practically no qualitative difference between cluster decay and spontaneous cold fission.

History

The first information about the atomic nucleus was obtained at the beginning of the 20th century by studying radioactivity. For a long period of time only three kinds of nuclear decay modes (alpha, beta, and gamma) were known. They illustrate three of the fundamental interactions in nature: strong, weak, and electromagnetic. Spontaneous fission became better studied soon after its discovery in 1940 by Konstantin Petrzhak and Georgy Flyorov because of both the military and the peaceful applications of induced fission. This was discovered circa 1939 by Otto Hahn, Lise Meitner, and Fritz Strassmann.

There are many other kinds of radioactivity, e.g. cluster decay, proton emission, various beta-delayed decay modes (p, 2p, 3p, n, 2n, 3n, 4n, d, t, alpha, f), fission isomers, particle accompanied (ternary) fission, etc. The height of the potential barrier, mainly of Coulomb nature, for emission of the charged particles is much higher than the observed kinetic energy of the emitted particles. The spontaneous decay can only be explained by quantum tunneling in a similar way to the first application of the Quantum Mechanics to Nuclei given by G. Gamow for alpha decay.

In 1980 A. Sandulescu, D.N. Poenaru, and W. Greiner described calculations indicating the possibility of a new type of decay of heavy nuclei intermediate between alpha decay and spontaneous fission. The first observation of heavy-ion radioactivity was that of a 30-MeV, carbon-14 emission from radium-223 by H.J. Rose and G.A. Jones in 1984.

— Encyclopædia Britannica,

Usually the theory explains an already experimentally observed phenomenon. Cluster decay is one of the rare examples of phenomena predicted before experimental discovery. Theoretical predictions were made in 1980, four years before experimental discovery.

Four theoretical approaches were used: fragmentation theory by solving a Schrödinger equation with mass asymmetry as a variable to obtain the mass distributions of fragments; penetrability calculations similar to those used in traditional theory of alpha decay, and superasymmetric fission models, numerical (NuSAF) and analytical (ASAF). Superasymmetric fission models are based on the macroscopic-microscopic approach using the asymmetrical two-center shell model level energies as input data for the shell and pairing corrections. Either the liquid drop model or the Yukawa-plus-exponential model extended to different charge-to-mass ratios have been used to calculate the macroscopic deformation energy.

Penetrability theory predicted eight decay modes: C, Ne, Mg, Si, Ar, and Ca from the following parent nuclei: Ra, Th, U, Pu, Cm, Cf, Fm, and No.

The first experimental report was published in 1984, when physicists at Oxford University discovered that Ra emits one C nucleus among every billion (10) decays by alpha emission.

Theory

The quantum tunneling may be calculated either by extending fission theory to a larger mass asymmetry or by heavier emitted particle from alpha decay theory.

Both fission-like and alpha-like approaches are able to express the decay constant ${\displaystyle \lambda =\ln 2/T_{\text{c}}}$ , as a product of three model-dependent quantities

${\displaystyle \lambda =\nu SP_{\text{s}}}$

where ${\displaystyle \nu }$ is the frequency of assaults on the barrier per second, S is the preformation probability of the cluster at the nuclear surface, and P_s is the penetrability of the external barrier. In alpha-like theories S is an overlap integral of the wave function of the three partners (parent, daughter, and emitted cluster). In a fission theory the preformation probability is the penetrability of the internal part of the barrier from the initial turning point R_i to the touching point R_t. Very frequently it is calculated by using the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation.

A very large number, of the order 10, of parent-emitted cluster combinations were considered in a systematic search for new decay modes. The large amount of computations could be performed in a reasonable time by using the ASAF model developed by Dorin N Poenaru, Walter Greiner, et al. The model was the first to be used to predict measurable quantities in cluster decay. More than 150 cluster decay modes have been predicted before any other kind of half-lives calculations have been reported. Comprehensive tables of half-lives, branching ratios, and kinetic energies have been published, e.g. Potential barrier shapes similar to that considered within the ASAF model have been calculated by using the macroscopic-microscopic method.

Previously it was shown that even alpha decay may be considered a particular case of cold fission. The ASAF model may be used to describe in a unified manner cold alpha decay, cluster decay, and cold fission (see figure 6.7, p. 287 of the Ref. ).

One can obtain with good approximation one universal curve (UNIV) for any kind of cluster decay mode with a mass number Ae, including alpha decay

${\displaystyle \log T=-\log P_{s}-22.169+0.598(A_{e}-1)}$

In a logarithmic scale the equation log T = f(log P_s) represents a single straight line which can be conveniently used to estimate the half-life. A single universal curve for alpha decay and cluster decay modes results by expressing log T + log S = f(log P_s). The experimental data on cluster decay in three groups of even-even, even-odd, and odd-even parent nuclei are reproduced with comparable accuracy by both types of universal curves, fission-like UNIV and UDL derived using alpha-like R-matrix theory.

In order to find the released energy

${\displaystyle Q=c^{2}}$

one can use the compilation of measured masses M, M_d, and M_e of the parent, daughter, and emitted nuclei, c is the light velocity. The mass excess is transformed into energy according to the Einstein's formula E = mc.

Experiments

The main experimental difficulty in observing cluster decay comes from the need to identify a few rare events against a background of alpha particles. The quantities experimentally determined are the partial half life, T_c, and the kinetic energy of the emitted cluster E_k. There is also a need to identify the emitted particle.

Detection of radiations is based on their interactions with matter, leading mainly to ionizations. Using a semiconductor telescope and conventional electronics to identify the C ions, the Rose and Jones's experiment was running for about six months in order to get 11 useful events.

With modern magnetic spectrometers (SOLENO and Enge-split pole), at Orsay and Argonne National Laboratory (see ch. 7 in Ref. pp. 188–204), a very strong source could be used, so that results were obtained in a run of few hours.

Solid state nuclear track detectors (SSNTD) insensitive to alpha particles and magnetic spectrometers in which alpha particles are deflected by a strong magnetic field have been used to overcome this difficulty. SSNTD are cheap and handy but they need chemical etching and microscope scanning.

A key role in experiments on cluster decay modes performed in Berkeley, Orsay, Dubna, and Milano was played by P. Buford Price, Eid Hourany, Michel Hussonnois, Svetlana Tretyakova, A. A. Ogloblin, Roberto Bonetti, and their coworkers.

The main region of 20 emitters experimentally observed until 2010 is above Z = 86: Fr, Ra, Ac, Th, Pa, U, Pu, and Cm. Only upper limits could be detected in the following cases: C decay of Ba, N decay of Ac, O decay of Th, Ne decays of Th and of U, Mg decays of U, Mg decay of Np, and Si decay of Pu and of Am.

Some of the cluster emitters are members of the three natural radioactive families. Others should be produced by nuclear reactions. Up to now no odd-odd emitter has been observed.

From many decay modes with half-lives and branching ratios relative to alpha decay predicted with the analytical superasymmetric fission (ASAF) model, the following 11 have been experimentally confirmed: C, O, F, Ne, Mg, and Si. The experimental data are in good agreement with predicted values. A strong shell effect can be seen: as a rule the shortest value of the half-life is obtained when the daughter nucleus has a magic number of neutrons (N_d = 126) and/or protons (Z_d = 82).

The known cluster emissions as of 2010 are as follows:

Fine structure

The fine structure in C radioactivity of Ra was discussed for the first time by M. Greiner and W. Scheid in 1986. The superconducting spectrometer SOLENO of IPN Orsay has been used since 1984 to identify C clusters emitted from Ra nuclei. Moreover, it was used to discover the fine structure observing transitions to excited states of the daughter. A transition with an excited state of C predicted in Ref. was not yet observed.

Surprisingly, the experimentalists had seen a transition to the first excited state of the daughter stronger than that to the ground state. The transition is favoured if the uncoupled nucleon is left in the same state in both parent and daughter nuclei. Otherwise the difference in nuclear structure leads to a large hindrance.

The interpretation was confirmed: the main spherical component of the deformed parent wave function has an i_11/2 character, i.e. the main component is spherical.

References

1. Kondev, F. G.; Wang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Naimi, S.; Audi, G. (2021). "The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear properties" (PDF). Chinese Physics C. 45 (3): 030001. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae."
2. Poenaru, Dorin N.; Greiner, Walter (2011). "Cluster Radioactivity". Clusters in Nuclei I. Lecture Notes in Physics. Vol. 818. Berlin: Springer. pp. 1–56. ISBN 978-3-642-13898-0.
3. Tavares, O. A. P.; Roberto, L. A. M.; Medeiros, E. L. (2007). "Radioactive decay by the emission of heavy nuclear fragments". Physica Scripta. 76: 375–384. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/76/4/016.
4. Poenaru, D. N.; Greiner, W. (1996). Nuclear Decay Modes. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing. pp. 1–577. ISBN 978-0-7503-0338-5.
5. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2011.
6. Sandulescu, A.; Poenaru, D. N.; Greiner, W. "New type of decay of heavy nuclei intermediate between fission and alpha-decay". Soviet Journal of Particles and Nuclei. 11: 528–541. OSTI 6189038.
7. Rose, H. J.; Jones, G. A. (1984). "A new kind of natural radioactivity". Nature. 307 (5948): 245–247. Bibcode:1984Natur.307..245R. doi:10.1038/307245a0. S2CID 4312488.
8. Strutinsky, V. M. (1967). "Shell effects in nuclear masses and deformation energies". Nuclear Physics A. 95 (2): 420–442. Bibcode:1967NuPhA..95..420S. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(67)90510-6.
9. Maruhn, Joachim; Greiner, Walter (1972). "The asymmetrie two center shell model". Zeitschrift für Physik. 251 (5): 431–457. Bibcode:1972ZPhy..251..431M. doi:10.1007/BF01391737. S2CID 117002558.
10. Gherghescu, R. A. (2003). "Deformed two-center shell model". Physical Review C. 67 (1): 014309. arXiv:nucl-th/0210064. Bibcode:2003PhRvC..67a4309G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.67.014309. S2CID 119429669.
11. Myers, William D.; Swiatecki, Wladyslaw J. (1966). "Nuclear masses and deformations". Nuclear Physics. 81: 1–60. doi:10.1016/0029-5582(66)90639-0.
12. Krappe, H. J.; Nix, J. R.; Sierk, A. J. (1979). "Unified nuclear potential for heavy-ion elastic scattering, fusion, fission, and ground-state masses and deformations". Physical Review C. 20 (3): 992–1013. Bibcode:1979PhRvC..20..992K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.20.992.
13. Poenaru, D.N.; Ivaşcu, M.; Mazilu, D. (1980). "Folded Yukawa-plus-exponential model pes for nuclei with different charge densities". Computer Physics Communications. 19 (2): 205–214. Bibcode:1980CoPhC..19..205P. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(80)90051-X.
14. Poenaru, D.N.; Greiner, W. (1995). "Nuclear Decay by Cluster Emission" (PDF). Europhys. News. Retrieved 15 December 2023.
15. Blendowske, R.; Fliessbach, T.; Walliser, H. (1996). Nuclear Decay Modes. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing. pp. 337–349. ISBN 978-0-7503-0338-5.
16. Poenaru, Dorin N.; Greiner, Walter (1991). "Cluster preformation as barrier penetrability". Physica Scripta. 44 (5): 427–429. Bibcode:1991PhyS...44..427P. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/44/5/004. S2CID 250885957.
17. Poenaru, D. N.; Ivascu, M.; Sandulescu, A.; Greiner, W. (1984). "Spontaneous emission of heavy clusters". Journal of Physics G. 10 (8): L183–L189. Bibcode:1984JPhG...10L.183P. doi:10.1088/0305-4616/10/8/004. S2CID 250844668.
18. Poenaru, D. N.; Schnabel, D.; Greiner, W.; Mazilu, D.; Gherghescu, R. (1991). "Nuclear lifetimes for cluster radioactivities". Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables. 48 (2): 231–327. Bibcode:1991ADNDT..48..231P. doi:10.1016/0092-640X(91)90008-R.
19. Poenaru, Dorin N.; Gherghescu, Radu A.; Greiner, Walter (2006). "Potential energy surfaces for cluster emitting nuclei". Physical Review C. 73 (1): 014608. arXiv:nucl-th/0509073. Bibcode:2006PhRvC..73a4608P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.014608. S2CID 119434512.
20. Poenaru, D. N.; Ivascu, M.; Sandulescu, A. (1979). "Alpha decay as a fission-like process". Journal of Physics G. 5 (10): L169–L173. Bibcode:1979JPhG....5L.169P. doi:10.1088/0305-4616/5/10/005. S2CID 250859467.
21. Poenaru, D. N.; Gherghescu, R. A.; Greiner, W. (2011). "Single universal curve for cluster radioactivities and α-decay". Physical Review C. 83 (1): 014601. Bibcode:2011PhRvC..83a4601P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.014601.
22. Qi, C.; Xu, F. R.; Liotta, R. J.; Wyss, R. (2009). "Universal Decay Law in Charged-Particle Emission and Exotic Cluster Radioactivity". Physical Review Letters. 103 (7): 072501. arXiv:0909.4492. Bibcode:2009PhRvL.103g2501Q. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.072501. PMID 19792636. S2CID 34973496.
23. Audi, G.; Wapstra, A. H.; Thibault, C. (2003). "The Ame2003 atomic mass evaluation". Nuclear Physics A. 729 (1): 337–676. Bibcode:2003NuPhA.729..337A. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003.
24. Baum, E. M.; et al. (2002). Nuclides and Isotopes: Chart of the nuclides (16th ed.). Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (Lockheed Martin).
25. Bonetti, R.; Guglielmetti, A. (2007). "Cluster radioactivity: an overview after twenty years" (PDF). Romanian Reports in Physics. 59: 301–310. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 September 2016.
26. Guglielmetti, A.; Faccio, D.; Bonetti, R.; Shishkin, S. V.; Tretyakova, S. P.; Dmitriev, S. V.; Ogloblin, A. A.; Pik-Pichak, G. A.; van der Meulen, N. P.; Steyn, G. F.; van der Walt, T. N.; Vermeulen, C.; McGee, D. (2008). "Carbon radioactivity ofAc and a search for nitrogen emission". Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 111 (1): 012050. Bibcode:2008JPhCS.111a2050G. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/111/1/012050.
27. ^ Greiner, M.; Scheid, W. (1986). "Radioactive decay into excited states via heavy ion emission". Journal of Physics G. 12 (10): L229–L234. Bibcode:1986JPhG...12L.229G. doi:10.1088/0305-4616/12/10/003. S2CID 250914956.
28. Brillard, L.; Elayi, A. G.; Hourani, E.; Hussonnois, M.; Le Du, J. F.; Rosier, L. H.; Stab, L. (1989). "Mise en évidence d'une structure fine dans la radioactivité C". C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 309: 1105–1110.
29. Hourany, E.; Berrier-Ronsin, G.; Elayi, A.; Hoffmann-Rothe, P.; Mueller, A. C.; Rosier, L.; Rotbard, G.; Renou, G.; Lièbe, A.; Poenaru, D. N.; Ravn, H. L. (1995). "Ra Nuclear Spectroscopy in C Radioactivity". Physical Review C. 52 (1): 267–270. Bibcode:1995PhRvC..52..267H. doi:10.1103/physrevc.52.267. PMID 9970505.
30. Sheline, R. K.; Ragnarsson, I. (1991). "Interpretation of the fine structure in the C radioactive decay of Ra". Physical Review C. 43 (3): 1476–1479. Bibcode:1991PhRvC..43.1476S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.43.1476. PMID 9967191.

External links

• National Nuclear Data Center

• Nuclear physics
• Radioactivity