Misplaced Pages

Complex-oriented cohomology theory

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

In algebraic topology, a complex-orientable cohomology theory is a multiplicative cohomology theory E such that the restriction map E 2 ( C P ) E 2 ( C P 1 ) {\displaystyle E^{2}(\mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty })\to E^{2}(\mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{1})} is surjective. An element of E 2 ( C P ) {\displaystyle E^{2}(\mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty })} that restricts to the canonical generator of the reduced theory E ~ 2 ( C P 1 ) {\displaystyle {\widetilde {E}}^{2}(\mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{1})} is called a complex orientation. The notion is central to Quillen's work relating cohomology to formal group laws.

If E is an even-graded theory meaning π 3 E = π 5 E = {\displaystyle \pi _{3}E=\pi _{5}E=\cdots } , then E is complex-orientable. This follows from the Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence.

Examples:

  • An ordinary cohomology with any coefficient ring R is complex orientable, as H 2 ( C P ; R ) H 2 ( C P 1 ; R ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {H} ^{2}(\mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty };R)\simeq \operatorname {H} ^{2}(\mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{1};R)} .
  • Complex K-theory, denoted KU, is complex-orientable, as it is even-graded. (Bott periodicity theorem)
  • Complex cobordism, whose spectrum is denoted by MU, is complex-orientable.

A complex orientation, call it t, gives rise to a formal group law as follows: let m be the multiplication

C P × C P C P , ( [ x ] , [ y ] ) [ x y ] {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty }\times \mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty }\to \mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty },(,)\mapsto }

where [ x ] {\displaystyle } denotes a line passing through x in the underlying vector space C [ t ] {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} } of C P {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty }} . This is the map classifying the tensor product of the universal line bundle over C P {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty }} . Viewing

E ( C P ) = lim E ( C P n ) = lim R [ t ] / ( t n + 1 ) = R [ [ t ] ] , R = π E {\displaystyle E^{*}(\mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty })=\varprojlim E^{*}(\mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{n})=\varprojlim R/(t^{n+1})=R\!],\quad R=\pi _{*}E} ,

let f = m ( t ) {\displaystyle f=m^{*}(t)} be the pullback of t along m. It lives in

E ( C P × C P ) = lim E ( C P n × C P m ) = lim R [ x , y ] / ( x n + 1 , y m + 1 ) = R [ [ x , y ] ] {\displaystyle E^{*}(\mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty }\times \mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{\infty })=\varprojlim E^{*}(\mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{n}\times \mathbb {C} \mathbf {P} ^{m})=\varprojlim R/(x^{n+1},y^{m+1})=R\!]}

and one can show, using properties of the tensor product of line bundles, it is a formal group law (e.g., satisfies associativity).

See also

References

Stub icon

This topology-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: