Cosmetic industry

(Redirected from Cosmetic-grade) Industry that manufactures and distributes cosmetic products

The cosmetic industry describes the industry that manufactures and distributes cosmetic products. These include colour cosmetics, like foundation and mascara, skincare such as moisturisers and cleansers, haircare such as shampoos, conditioners and hair colours, and toiletries such as bubble bath and soap. The manufacturing industry is dominated by a small number of multinational corporations that originated in the early 20th century, but the distribution and sale of cosmetics is spread among a wide range of different businesses. Cosmetics must be safe when customers use them in accordance with the label's instructions or in the conventional or expected manner. One measure a producer may take to guarantee the safety of a cosmetic product is product testing. FDA occasionally does testing as part of its research program or when looking into potential safety issues with a product. Both the cosmetics business and consumers can benefit from the FDA's resources on product testing.

The largest cosmetic companies are L'Oreal, Estée Lauder, Coty, Nivea, Shiseido and Chanel. The market volume of the cosmetics industry in Europe and the United States is about EUR €70 billion per year, according to a 2005 publication. The worldwide cosmetics and perfume industry currently generates an estimated annual turnover of US$170 billion (according to Eurostaf – May 2007). Europe is the leading market, representing approximately €63 billion.

By region

Americas

United States

Within the United States, the state of California has the largest concentration of beauty establishments in America at 25.5%, followed by New Jersey at 8.1% of American beauty establishments. Since 2016, the number of cosmetic stores rises between 3 and 4% each year and employment in this division is rising each year 13-16%.

California has the largest concentration due to social media marketing from celebrities and ‘beauty gurus’. For example, Kylie Jenner's company Kylie Cosmetics, is valued at $800 million and sold an estimated $330 million worth of makeup in 2017. YouTube and social media influencers Jeffree Star (Jeffree Star Cosmetics), and Michelle Phan (Ipsy), and pop-star Rihanna with her Fenty Beauty line of cosmetics, have also contributed to California's rising popularity in the beauty industry.

Because the US dollar is so valuable to other countries around the world, it has become extremely expensive for most countries to import American beauty products and to export their own products to America. However, there are a few countries with beauty products that are in popular demand in America due to their quality and value including France, Canada, Italy, and the United Kingdom.

As of 2018, “These four countries account for 45.2% of all industry imports as domestic consumers demand luxury products”. South Korean and Japanese skincare products which are designed to be more gentle and innovative, are also becoming more popularized in the United States due to their quality and affordability. The U.S. has held the same regulation over this industry since 1938 under the FD&C Act, which has gained additional amendments over time.

Canada

Canada is a big influencer in the American beauty industry due to its proximity to the United States and because it falls under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). This agreement “eliminates most tariffs on products traded between Canada, Mexico, and the United States," and allows Canada to trade superfluously. Canada accounts for an estimated 13.6% of imports and 19.9% of cosmetic exports in 2018. Because Mexico also benefits from the NAFTA trade agreement, they represent another top cosmetic importer and exporter for lower-priced beauty products which are manufactured in mass and sold in large drug store chains in America.

Europe

France

Cosmetic sales in France reached €6.5 billion in 2006, according to FIPAR (Fédération des Industries de la Parfumerie – the French federation for the perfume industry). France is another country in which the cosmetic industry plays an important role, both nationally and internationally. Most products with a label, "Made in France" are valued on the international market. According to data from 2008, the cosmetic industry has grown constantly in France for 40 consecutive years. Famous cosmetic brands produced in France include Vichy, Yves Saint Laurent, Yves Rocher, Bioderma and L'Oreal. L'Oreal is known for its mass production of hair and makeup products which are produced in mass and sold in drug stores in America as well as internationally. L'Oreal has gained popularity especially due to its app Makeup Genius which allows users to try on makeup using their phone camera in addition to working with Los Angeles-based NYX Cosmetics and Estee Lauder's MAC Cosmetics, L'Oreal is one of the leading cosmetic brands in the United States. According to the company's latest financial report of 2017, North America accounted for 13.6% of the company's global cosmetic sales.

Germany

In Germany, the cosmetic industry generated €12.6 billion of retail sales in 2008, which, at the time, made the German cosmetic industry the third largest in the world after Japan and the United States. It has been shown that Germany's cosmetic industry grew nearly 5 percent in one year, from 2007 to 2008. German exports in this industry reached €5.8 billion in 2008, whereas imports of cosmetics totaled €3 billion. Germany gains most of its imported cosmetics from France, Switzerland, the United States and Italy.

Italy

Further information: Made in Italy

Belarus

The Belarusian cosmetics market consists of Belarusian companies. There are more than 20 cosmetic companies in Belarus - Belita, Vitex, Lux Visage, Mastige, Modum, Rekish Cosmetics. The volume of the cosmetic market is more than 300 million euros per year.

Asia

Fashion designer collaboration

Due to the popularity of cosmetics, especially fragrances and perfumes, many designers who are not necessarily involved in the cosmetic industry came up with different perfumes carrying their names. Moreover, some actors and singers have their own perfume line (such as Celine Dion). Designer perfumes are, like any other designer products, the most expensive in the industry as the consumer pays not only for the product but also for the brand.

Marketing

The cosmetic industry worldwide seems to be continuously developing, now more than ever with the advent of the Internet companies. Many famous companies sell their cosmetic products online also, in countries in which they do not have representatives.

Research on the email marketing of cosmetics to consumers suggests they are goal-oriented with email content that is seen as useful, motivating recipients to visit a store to test the cosmetics or talk to sales representatives. Useful content included special sales offerings and new product information rather than information about makeup trends.

Controversies

Colorism

Many companies advertise white or light skin as not only a cosmetic change, but a lifestyle change. White beauty implies a lifestyle of “sophistication, beauty, power, and wealth.” Mass advertising and marketing from the US and Europe, as well as multiple mass media forms are used to reach other cultures to influence their purchasing habits. Many of the skin lightening products sold usually have celebrity endorsements, further increasing sales and the desire for lighter skin. These products can cause serious damage to skin and pose a health risk to the consumer.

In a study done by S. S. Agrawal and Pallavi Sharma on eleven skin lightening products sold in India, it was found that “mercury was detected in all the samples of the skin lightening creams in the range of 0.14–0.36 ppm.” This study also observed that none of the brands tested include mercury as an ingredient on the packaging, which may mislead consumers regarding health risks. In a report by the World Health Organization, it was stated that “skin whitening products can cause leukemia, liver and kidney cancer and could also result in severe skin conditions.” Though these health risks exist, women of color in many parts of the world are purchasing skin lightening creams.

Choma and Prusaczyk's survey of women of color in the US and India “show that chronic surveillance of skin tone predicts skin tone dissatisfaction and skin bleaching.” Some companies in the cosmetic industry have capitalized off of the cultural pressure and standards for having lighter skin. This study concluded that “skin bleaching is not merely a physical or aesthetic change, but one with potentially wide-ranging implications on psychological well-being and, more broadly, the perpetuation of racist ideologies and beauty standards.”

Impact on environment

Some components found in cosmetics, as well as their production, have been found to have negative environmental impact. For example, Palm oil is found in lipstick, and shampoo. Palm oil is connected to the destruction of forests and habitats of endangered species, including orangutans, tigers, elephants, and rhinos.

Animal testing

Main articles: Testing cosmetics on animals and Cruelty-free cosmetics

Animal testing has been a large controversy in the cosmetic industry. Animal tests performed include the Draize eye irritancy test, where test chemicals are applied to rabbits’ eyes and left on for several days, and toxicity tests such as LD50, where a substance's toxicity is tested by determining the concentration at which it will kill 50% of the test animals.

Due to public outcry as well as financial and temporal considerations, animal testing in cosmetics has steadily been decreasing over time and replaced with non-animal tests. One of these non-animal tests is the Environmental Protection Agency’s ToxCast which has a similar accuracy compared to animal tests but achieves results with fewer economic costs and less time.

An EU ban of marketing cosmetic products which have been tested on animals became effective in 2013. There are a few exceptions to this law. Animal testing data for cosmetics can be used if the data for the ingredient used in the cosmetic originated from testing for non-cosmetic products. Secondly, if a country outside of the EU requires animal testing and the cosmetic product was tested in that country, the ban also does not apply. Cosmetic tests on animals are still legal in several countries, such as the US, Japan, Russia, and China.

There are a number of cosmetics companies that claim they are “cruelty-free,” such as Bath & Body Works, Aveda, ELF, and Milani, but some argue that because the label of “cruelty-free” both lacks regulation and standardized third-party certification, it has little real weight. Brands that claim to be cruelty free often advertize this with a logo of a rabbit on their products.

In some cases, cosmetic testing is done on humans, which also leads to a related discussion of best practices and ethics.

Labor rights and body politics

A number of studies have focused on social issues such as labor rights and sociology of the body. Research has found that some retail stores have discriminatory hiring practices and prefer to hire class-privileged workers to promote their upscale image.

References

"Top 10 Cosmetic Companies in the World: The List". American Cosmetic Association. 2023. Retrieved 5 March 2023.
Schneider, Günther; Gohla, Sven; Schreiber, Jörg; Kaden, Waltraud; Schönrock, Uwe; Schmidt-Lewerkühne, Hartmut; Kuschel, Annegret; Petsitis, Xenia; Pape, Wolfgang; Ippen, Hellmut; Diembeck, Walter (2001). "Skin Cosmetics". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. doi:10.1002/14356007.a24_219. ISBN 3-527-30673-0.
^ "Industry Research Reports". www.ibisworld.com.au. Retrieved 2019-03-25.
Salvador, Amparo; Chisvert, Alberto (2017). Analysis of Cosmetic Products. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-444-63516-7.
"NAFTA's Economic Impact". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 2019-03-25.
"France continues to lead the way in cosmetics". Retrieved 2010-08-04.
^ "Cosmetic Industry". Archived from the original on 2010-09-08. Retrieved 2010-08-04.
^ Oh, Chang Hoon; Rugman, Alan M. (April 2006). "Regional Sales of Multinationals in the World Cosmetics Industry" (PDF). European Management Journal. 24 (2–3): 163–173. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2006.03.006.
Barnes, Bradley; Yamamoto, Maki (28 April 2008). "Exploring international cosmetics advertising in Japan". Journal of Marketing Management. 24 (3–4): 299–316. doi:10.1362/026725708X306112. S2CID 167830492.
Shankar, P. Ravi; Giri, Bishnu Rath; Palaian, Subish (25 July 2006). "Fairness Creams in South Asia—A Case of Disease Mongering?". PLOS Medicine. 3 (7): e315. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030315. PMC 1518681. PMID 16848620.
Tai, Susan H. C. (June 2008). "Beauty and the Beast: The Brand Crisis of SK-II Cosmetics in China". Asian Case Research Journal. 12 (1): 57–71. doi:10.1142/S0218927508001023.
Dix-Cooper, Linda; Kosatsky, Tom (April 2018). "Blood mercury, lead and cadmium levels and determinants of exposure among newcomer South and East Asian women of reproductive age living in Vancouver, Canada". Science of the Total Environment. 619–620: 1409–1419. Bibcode:2018ScTEn.619.1409D. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.126. PMID 29734617.
Iqbal, MP (January 2012). "Lead pollution - a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in Asian developing countries". Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 25 (1): 289–294. PMID 22186343.
Martin, Brett A. S.; Van Durme, Joël; Raulas, Mika; Merisavo, Marko (September 2003). "Email Advertising: Exploratory Insights from Finland". Journal of Advertising Research. 43 (3): 293–300. doi:10.1017/s0021849903030265.
Hunter, Margaret L. (1 June 2011). "Buying racial capital: skin-bleaching and cosmetic surgery in a globalized world" (PDF). Journal of Pan African Studies. 4 (4): 142–165. Gale A306514739.
Agrawal, S.S.; Sharma, Pallavi (March 2017). "Current status of mercury level in skin whitening creams". Current Medicine Research and Practice. 7 (2): 47–50. doi:10.1016/j.cmrp.2017.02.001.
Harper, Kathryn; Choma, Becky L. (June 2019). "Internalised White Ideal, Skin Tone Surveillance, and Hair Surveillance Predict Skin and Hair Dissatisfaction and Skin Bleaching among African American and Indian Women". Sex Roles. 80 (11–12): 735–744. doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0966-9. S2CID 150156045.
Dhanirama, Danelle; Gronow, Jan; Voulvoulis, Nikolaos (2012-07-01). "Cosmetics as a potential source of environmental contamination in the UK". Environmental Technology. 33 (14): 1597–1608. Bibcode:2012EnvTe..33.1597D. doi:10.1080/09593330.2011.640353. ISSN 0959-3330. PMID 22988620. S2CID 19751576.
Csorba, Luiela Magdalena; Boglea, Vanina Adoriana (2011-02-15). "Sustainable cosmetics: a major instrument in protecting the consumer's interest". Regional and Business Studies. 3 (1 Suppl): 167–176. ISSN 2732-2726.
Guerranti, C.; Martellini, T.; Perra, G.; Scopetani, C.; Cincinelli, A. (2019-05-01). "Microplastics in cosmetics: Environmental issues and needs for global bans". Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 68: 75–79. Bibcode:2019EnvTP..68...75G. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2019.03.007. ISSN 1382-6689. PMID 30877953. S2CID 81977316.
Prothero, Andrea; McDonagh, Pierre (1992-04-01). "Producing Environmentally Acceptable Cosmetics? The Impact of Environmentalism on the United Kingdom Cosmetics and Toiletries Industry". Journal of Marketing Management. 8 (2): 147–166. doi:10.1080/0267257X.1992.9964186. ISSN 0267-257X.
Products containing palm oil
Tullis, Paul (19 February 2019). "How the world got hooked on palm oil". The Guardian.
^ Winders, Delcianna J (April 2006). "Combining Reflexive Law and False Advertising Law to Standardize 'Cruelty-Free' Labeling of Cosmetics". NYU Law Review. 81 (1).
Rowan, Andrew (1 January 1983). "The LD50--The Beginning of the End". Experimentation Collection.
^ Rowan, Andrew N. (October 2015). "Ending the Use of Animals in Toxicity Testing and Risk Evaluation". Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 24 (4): 448–458. doi:10.1017/S0963180115000109. PMID 26364779. S2CID 5720148. ProQuest 1711663923.
^ Fischer, Kristian (December 2015). "Animal Testing and Marketing Bans of the EU Cosmetics Legislation". European Journal of Risk Regulation. 6 (4): 613–621. doi:10.1017/S1867299X00005158. S2CID 168066036. ProQuest 1752184361.
"These Companies DON'T Test on Animals". PETA. January 13, 2016. Retrieved March 25, 2019.
Pauwels, M.; Rogiers, V. (2004-06-15). "Safety evaluation of cosmetics in the EU: Reality and challenges for the toxicologist". Toxicology Letters. 151 (1): 7–17. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.01.026. ISSN 0378-4274. PMID 15177635.
Baldoz, Rick; Koeber, Charles (2009). The Critical Study of Work: Labor, Technology, and Global Production. Temple University Press. ISBN 978-1-59213-809-8.
^ Lan, Pei-Chia (2003). "Working in a Neon Cage: Bodily Labor of Cosmetics Saleswomen in Taiwan". Feminist Studies. 29 (1): 21–45. ISSN 0046-3663. JSTOR 3178467.
Otis, Eileen (2016-02-01). "China's Beauty Proletariat: The Body Politics of Hegemony in a Walmart Cosmetics Department". Positions: Asia Critique. 24 (1): 155–177. doi:10.1215/10679847-3320089. ISSN 1067-9847. S2CID 147443582.

Misplaced Pages