Misplaced Pages

Critical Assessment of Function Annotation

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Evaluation of bioinformatic predictors of protein function

The Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) is an experiment designed to provide a large-scale assessment of computational methods dedicated to predicting protein function. Different algorithms are evaluated by their ability to predict the Gene Ontology (GO) terms in the categories of Molecular Function, Biological Process, and Cellular Component.

The experiment consists of two tracks: (i) the eukaryotic track, (ii) the prokaryotic track. In each track, a set of targets is provided by the organizers. Participants are expected to submit their predictions by the submission deadline, after which they are assessed according to a set of specific metrics.

Motivation

The genome of an organism may consist of hundreds to tens of thousands of genes, which encode for hundreds of thousands of different protein sequences. Due to the relatively low cost of genome sequencing, determining gene and protein sequences is fast and inexpensive. Thousands of species have been sequenced so far, yet many of the proteins are not well characterized. The process of experimentally determining the role of a protein in the cell, is an expensive and time consuming task. Further, even when functional assays are performed they are unlikely to provide complete insight into protein function. Therefore it has become important to use computational tools in order to functionally annotate proteins. There are several computational methods of protein function prediction that can infer protein function using a variety of biological and evolutionary data, but there is significant room for improvement. Accurate prediction of protein function can have longstanding implications on biomedical and pharmaceutical research.

The CAFA experiment is designed to provide unbiased assessment of computational methods, to stimulate research in computational function prediction, and provide insights into the overall state-of-the-art in function prediction.

Organization

The experiment consists of three phases:

  1. Prediction phase: ~4 months

Organizers provide protein sequences with unknown or incomplete function to community and set the deadline for the submission of predictions

  1. Target accumulation: 6–12 months

After all predictions are stored and the experiment enters a waiting period in which protein functions are expected to accumulate in public databases

  1. Analysis Phase: 1 month

Predictors are ranked according to their performance. The results are publicly shared in scientific meetings and published after peer review.

History

The CAFA experiment is conducted by the Automated Function Prediction (AFP) Special Interest Group (AFP/SIG). CAFA was conceived by Dr. Inbal (Halperin) Landsberg, and was organized by her along with Prof. Russ Altman, and Dr. Iddo Friedberg. An AFP/SIG meeting has been held alongside the Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology conference in 2005, 2006, 2008, 2011, and 2012.

CAFA 2010-2012

The first CAFA experiment was organized between fall 2010 and spring 2012. The organizers provided 48,000 sequences for the community with the task to prediction Gene Ontology annotations for each of these sequences. Of those 48,000 proteins, 866 were experimentally annotated during target accumulation phase. The results showed that current function prediction algorithms perform significantly better than a simple domain assignment or a straightforward use of BLAST package. However, they also revealed that accurate prediction of a protein's biological function is still an open and challenging problem.

CAFA 2013-2014

The second CAFA experiment kicked off in fall 2013. Starting in August, interested parties could download more than 100,000 target sequences in 27 species. Registered teams are challenged to annotate the sequences with Gene Ontology terms, with an additional challenge to annotate human sequences with Human Phenotype Ontology terms. The submission deadline was January 15, 2014. The assessment of predictions will take place in June 2014.

See also

CASP: Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction
CAPRI: Critical Assessment of Prediction of Interactions

References

  1. Predrag, Radivojac; et al. (2013). "A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction". Nature Methods. 10 (3): 221–227. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2340. PMC 3584181. PMID 23353650.
  2. Bernal, Axel; Uy Ear; Nikos Kyrpides (2001). "Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD): a monitor of genome projects world-wide". Nucleic Acids Research. 29 (1): 126–127. doi:10.1093/nar/29.1.126. PMC 29859. PMID 11125068.
  3. Friedberg, Iddo; Martin Jambon; Adam Godzik (June 2006). "New avenues in protein function prediction". Protein Science. 15 (6): 1527–1529. doi:10.1110/ps.062158406. PMC 2242544. PMID 16731984.
  4. Rodrigues, Ana; Barry Grant; Adam Godzik; Iddo Friedberg (2007). "The 2006 Automated Function Prediction Meeting". Bioinformatics. 8 (Suppl 4): S1–4. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-s4-s1. PMC 1892079. PMID 17570143.
  5. Gillis, Jesse; Paul Pavlidis (April 2013). "Characterizing the state of the art in the computational assignment of gene function: lessons from the first critical assessment of functional annotation (CAFA)" (PDF). BMC Bioinformatics. 14 (Suppl 3): S15. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-s3-s15. PMC 3633048. PMID 23630983.

External links

Category: