Misplaced Pages

Alexander Cunningham (jurist)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Cunningham Gambit)

abcdefgh
8a8 black rookb8 black knightc8 black bishopd8 black queene8 black kingg8 black knighth8 black rooka7 black pawnb7 black pawnc7 black pawnd7 black pawne7 black bishopf7 black pawng7 black pawnh7 black pawne4 white pawnf4 black pawnf3 white knighta2 white pawnb2 white pawnc2 white pawnd2 white pawng2 white pawnh2 white pawna1 white rookb1 white knightc1 white bishopd1 white queene1 white kingf1 white bishoph1 white rook8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Cunningham Defence (3...Be7) in the KGA

Alexander Cunningham of Block (1655–1730) was a Scottish jurist, and chess player. As a classical critic, he was known as an opponent of Richard Bentley.

Life

The son of the Rev. John Cunningham, minister of Cumnock in Ayrshire, and proprietor of the small estate Block, was born there between 1655 and 1660. He was probably educated both in the Netherlands and at Edinburgh, and was selected by William Douglas, 1st Duke of Queensberry to be tutor to his son, Lord George Douglas. Through the Queensberry influence he was appointed by the Crown to be professor of civil law in the university of Edinburgh about 1698.

In 1710, when the Duke of Queensberry was out of favour with the other Whig leaders, the magistrates of Edinburgh asserted their ancient right and ousted Cunningham from the professorship to make way for their own nominee. He then left Scotland, and established himself at The Hague, where he lived on a pension granted him by the Duke of Queensberry, devoting himself to chess and the study of the classical authors and of civil law.

Works

Cunningham became a friend of Pieter Burman the Elder. In 1711 he discovered from Thomas Johnson, a Scottish bookseller and publisher at The Hague, that Richard Bentley was the author of the criticism inflicted on his friend Jean Leclerc for his edition of the fragments of Menander. In 1721 he published a malevolent Alexandri Cuninghamii Animadversiones in Richardi Bentleii Notas et Emendationes ad Q. Horatium Flaccum. In the same year he published his own critical edition of Horace, as Q. Horatii Flacci Poemata. He also worked at his editions of Virgil and Phædrus, published at Edinburgh after his death, and projected books on the Pandects and the evidences of Christianity. His posthumous works, published in Edinburgh, were:

  • P. Virgilii Maronis Bucolica, Georgica et Æneis, ex recensione Alexandri Cuninghamii Scoti, cujus emendationes subjiciuntur, 1743; and
  • Phædri Augusti, liberti, Fabularum Æsopiarum libri quinque, ex emendatione Alexandri Cuninghamii Scoti, accedunt Publii Syri et aliorum veterum Sententiæ, 1757.

Cunningham Gambit

Main article: Cunningham Defence
abcdefgh
8a8 black rookb8 black knighte8 black kingh8 black rooka7 black pawnb7 black pawnc7 black pawnf7 black pawng7 black pawnh7 black pawnf6 black queend4 white pawne4 white pawnf4 black pawng4 black bishoph4 black bishopf3 white knighta2 white pawnb2 white pawnc2 white pawnd2 white queene2 white kingg2 white pawnh2 white pawna1 white rookc1 white bishopf1 white bishoph1 white rook8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Sample position in the Cunningham Defense

It was as a chess-player that Alexander Cunningham was famous at the Hague. He was visited by players from all parts of Europe, and was on good terms with the English ambassadors at The Hague, especially with Lord Sunderland.

In his 1847 Chess Player's Handbook, Howard Staunton published 5 sample lines in the Cunningham Gambit: Kings Gambit Accepted (1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4), King's Knight's Gambit (3.Nf3), 3...Be7. The e7 Black bishop threatens a check on h4 that can permanently prevent White from castling.

A sample line is 4.Nc3 Bh4+ 5.Ke2 d5 6.Nxd5 Nf6 7.Nxf6+ Qxf6 8.d4 Bg4 9.Qd2 (diagram). White has strong central control with pawns on d4 and e4, while Black is relying on the white king's discomfort to compensate. White did not develop his f1 king's bishop immediately and was forced to play Ke2, which hems the bishop in.

Now more commonly known as the Cunningham Defence (1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 Be7) is tabulated as C35 King's Gambit Accepted, Cunningham Defense in the Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings.

To avoid having to play Ke2, 4.Bc4 is White's most popular response. In modern practice, it is more common for Black to simply develop instead with 4...Nf6 5.e5 Ng4, known as the Modern Cunningham.

Notes

  1. Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Cunningham, Alexander" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 7 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 633.
  2. ^ Stephen, Leslie, ed. (1888). "Cunningham, Alexander (1655?-1730)" . Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 13. London: Smith, Elder & Co.
  3. Staunton, Howard (1847). The Chess Player's Handbook: A Popular and Scientific Introduction to the Game of Chess. London: Henry G. Bohn. OCLC 9171272
  4. Sunnucks, Anne (1970), Encyclopaedia of Chess, New York: St. Martin's Press, ISBN 978-0-7091-4697-1
  5. "Chess Opening Explorer". Chessgames.com. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  6. Black can play ...Bh4+ anyway, forcing 5.Kf1 (or else the wild Bertin Gambit or Three Pawns' Gambit, 5.g3 fxg3 6.0-0 gxh2+ 7.Kh1, played in the nineteenth century).
Attribution

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Stephen, Leslie, ed. (1888). "Cunningham, Alexander (1655?-1730)". Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 13. London: Smith, Elder & Co.

Categories: