 | This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Department for Work and Pensions v Information Commissioner" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Department for Work and Pensions v Information Commissioner was a 2013 first-tier tribunal case in the United Kingdom. It concerned a dispute over whether companies that had participated in government 'workfare' schemes should be released under the Freedom of Information Act following a request by a man called Frank Zola. The tribunal ruled that the names of participant companies should be released.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) appealed to the Upper Tribunal but on 15 July 2014 this was dismissed.
References
- "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 27 September 2013.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber). "GIA 2560 2013". docs.google.com. HM Courts and Tribunals Service file hosted on Google Docs.
| Workfare in the United Kingdom | |
|---|---|
| Workfare Programmes | |
| Workfare Providers ('Primes') | |
| Workfare Companies | List of British organisations who have participated in workfare programmes |
| Opposition | |
| Litigation | |
| Legislation | Jobseekers (Back to Work Schemes) Act 2013 |
  | This article relating to law in the United Kingdom, or its constituent jurisdictions, is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |