Misplaced Pages

Determiner spreading

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Multiple determiners in linguistics

In linguistics, determiner spreading (DS), also known as Multiple or Double Determiners is the appearance of more than one determiner associated with a noun phrase, usually marking an adjective as well as the noun itself. The extra determiner has been called an adjectival determiner because determiner spreading is most commonly found in adjectival phrases. Typical examples involve multiple occurrences of the definite article or definiteness marking, such is found in (but not limited to) the languages listed below. The structure of such phrases is widely discussed and there is not one conclusive analysis. Because of this, the example languages below each show unique structure where different proposed analyses have been used.

Languages with determiner spreading

Determiner spreading in Albanian

Determiner spreading is found in Albanian where two definite articles are used for just one referent boy. As shown in (1) and (2), the ordering of the noun and the adjective does not matter, as long as the determiner falls before the adjective.

(1) djal-i i mirë
boy-the the good
N-D D Adj
'the good boy'

(from Alexiadou et al. 2007:73)

(2) i mir-i djalë
the good-the boy
D Adj-D N
'the good boy'

In Albanian, either of these sentence constructions in (1) and (2) are grammatical to mean the good boy. In both of the sentences the determiner i marks the referent boy. It is noted that the determiner i is a morphological entity to mark the adjectival class rather than definiteness of the noun, as is found in Greek below.

Modern Greek

In Modern Greek, determiner spreading is not obligatory, and it contrasts with a non-spreading example in (3):

(3)

i orea xoreftria
the beautiful dancer
i. 'the dancer who is beautiful'
ii. 'the dancer who dances beautifully'

The sentence above has an ambiguous meaning explained by the last two lines in the sentence above in (3). Both the meanings (i) and (ii) are grammatical with non-determiner spreading. However when DS is introduced, the sentence no longer takes on an ambiguous meaning. Determiner spreading in the example in (4) has eliminated the ambiguity, rendering the second meaning in (ii) to be ungrammatical.

(4)

i orea i xoreftria
the beautiful the dancer
i. the dancer who is beautiful
ii. *the dancer who dances beautifully
"the pen the silver" adapted from Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:367 drawn using mshang syntactic tree generator.

The question that is being posed in (5) requires an answer to differentiate which kind of pen, silver or gold. The response in (6) shows determiner spreading occurring because the adjective is a "restrictive modifier".

(5)

Ala pja pena-ti xrisi i tin asimenja?
but which pen-the golden or the silver
'But which pen; the gold or the silver?'

(6)

Nomizo tin asimenja tin pena / * Nomizo tin asimenja pena
I think the silver the pen / * I think the silver pen

Researchers believe that determiner spreading only occurs when the phrase has an "intersective reading". Meaning that the focus of the sentence is the kind of pen rather than the pen itself. The determiner spreading is syntactically how a speaker can give stress to a phrase in Modern Greek. It has been suggested that the same result of focus on the type of pen can be acquired semantically by giving focus to the adjective, as marked by capital letters in (7).

(7)

Nomizo tin ASIMENJA pena
I think the SILVER pen

A commonality between the Greek examples we have seen thus far is that determiner spreading is obligatorily definite Article (grammar) in Greek. Another language specific observation is that the determiner precedes the adjective. Researchers suggest that in order for an adjective to appear post-nominally, the determiner must precede the adjective to be grammatical in Greek. The examples below in (8) and (9) reinforce this observation showing (8) to be ungrammatical where meghalo follows spiti with no determiner intervening.

"the big house" adapted from Phoevos Panagiotidis, E., & Marinis, T. 2011:290 drawn using mshang syntax tree generator.

(8)

*To spiti megahalo to petrino
The house big the of.stone
'The big stone house'

(9)

To spiti to megahalo to petrino
The house the big the of.stone
'The big stone house'

An alternative structure to the tree above (see "the silver pen" tree), is shown to the right in "the big house". Researchers have described this structure as a predicative configuration in which the DP in SpecDP to spiti is acting as the subject of the higher DP.

Swedish

"the big car" adapted from Santelmann, L. 1993:174 drawn using mshang syntax tree generator.

In contrast with the optional DS in Greek, Swedish phrases that have an adjective show obligatory determiner spreading. Example (10) is marked as ungrammatical because it is monadic with respect to DS - there is only one determiner. By suffixing the noun with the determiner -en in example (11), the phrase becomes grammatical.

(10)

*den stora bil
the big car
'The big car'

(11)

den stora bil-en
the big car-the
'The big car'

One proposed analysis of the structure of DS in Swedish suggests that den-support, is used to support definite DPs when D cannot be satisfied in any other way. It is used as a type of feature support for definiteness; when the definite noun carries stress, den is inserted for support to the DP. The determiner den and the determiner suffix -en are in complementary distribution. This proposed structure is shown in the syntactic tree to the right; where the den has already been inserted and the -en is experiencing downward movement to suffix the noun bil.

See also

Notes

  1. Santelmann, L. 1993:1
  2. Martinis, T. 2003:165-190
  3. Rivero, M. L., Rallē, A., & MyiLibrary. 2001:165-166, 191-192
  4. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:73
  5. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:73
  6. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:73
  7. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:368
  8. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:368
  9. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:368
  10. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:366
  11. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:367
  12. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:367
  13. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:368
  14. Alexiadou, A., et al. 2007:367
  15. Phoevos Panagiotidis, E., & Marinis, T. 2011:270
  16. Phoevos Panagiotidis, E., & Marinis, T. 2011:270
  17. Phoevos Panagiotidis, E., & Marinis, T. 2011:283
  18. Santelmann, L. 1993:174
  19. Santelmann, L. 1993:174
  20. Santelmann, L. 1993:174
  21. Santelmann, L. 1993:174

Bibliography

  • Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L., & Stavrou, M. 2007. Noun Phrase in the generative perspective. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
  • Phoevos Panagiotidis, E., & Marinis, T. 2011. Determiner spreading as DP‐predication. Studia Linguistica, 65(3), 268-298. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9582.2011.01186.x
  • Rivero, M. L., Rallē, A., & MyiLibrary. 2001. Comparative syntax of Balkan languages. Oxford;New York;: Oxford University Press.
  • Santelmann, L. 1993. The distribution of double determiners in Swedish: den support in D*. Studia Linguistica, 47: 154–176. doi:10.1111/j.1467-

9582.1993.tb00844.x

  • Martinis, T. 2003. The acquisition of the DP in modern Greek. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Category: