Misplaced Pages

Dispute over the extended continental shelf in the Southern Zone Sea between Argentina and Chile

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Dispute over the extended continental shelf in the Southern Sea between Argentina and Chile) Argentina and Chile sea border dispute
Map of the dispute.

The dispute over the extended continental shelf in the Southern Zone Sea between Argentina and Chile is a disagreement between the two countries over a maritime area of 5,302 km² that began after Argentina attempted to extend its maritime space based on the theory of the extended continental shelf over the Southern Zone Sea (Spanish: Mar de la Zona Austral), south of Point F as agreed in the 1984 treaty, in an area claimed by Chile as part of its "presential sea", and now as part of its continental shelf (not extended) projected from the Diego Ramírez Islands.

Argentina previously claimed the overlapping "crescent" shaped zone as "heritage protection sea" continental shelves have prevalence over extended continental shelves according to the International Court rulling over the Colombia-Nicaragua case.

The dispute also involves both countries' projections towards the Antarctic continent. Under the terms of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Article 59 disputed and overlapping claims have no legal force until the dispute is resolved between the opposing parties.

History

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of April 30, 1982, which entered into force on November 16, 1994, established the regime of the continental shelf in Part VI (Articles 76 to 85), defining in Article 76, paragraph 1 what is understood as a continental shelf.

Argentina ratified the convention on January 12, 1995, and it came into force for the country on December 31, 1995.

On August 25, 1997, Chile signed and ratified the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and it entered into force for the country on September 24, 1997.

In 2009, Argentina submitted a presentation to the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, which was accepted in 2016 by the UNCLOS. The map in the submission included the disputed territories with the United Kingdom, such as the Falkland Islands, South Georgia, and South Sandwich Islands, a crescent-shaped area south of Argentina's territorial sea as defined in the 1984 treaty with Chile. This area was also claimed by Chile as part of its presential sea, and the sea surrounding the Antarctic Peninsula, which is claimed by all three aforementioned countries. That same year, on May 8, Chile submitted its Preliminary Report to the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf.

In 2020, the Argentine Chamber of Deputies unanimously approved the outer limit of the Argentine Continental Shelf in Law 27,557.

That same year, on December 21, Chile submitted to the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf the partial report on the extended continental shelf in Easter Island and Salas y Gómez.

In 2021, Chilean President Sebastián Piñera signed Supreme Decree No. 95, which outlined the continental shelf east of the 67º 16' 0 meridian as part of Chile's continental shelf (not the extended one) area projected from the Diego Ramírez Islands, also claiming the crescent area that Argentina considers part of its extension achieved under the extended continental shelf principle. This was reflected in the SHOA Chart No. 8 and prompted a response from the Argentine Foreign Ministry against Chile's measure.

In February 2022, Chile submitted its second partial presentation regarding the Western Continental Shelf of the Chilean Antarctic Territory. In August of the same year, Chile made the oral presentations of both partial submissions during the 55th Session of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf at the United Nations in New York.

In 2023, Chile, through SHOA, made available an illustrative graphic showing all the maritime areas claimed by the country, which was once again rejected by Argentina.

In July 2023, the International Court of Justice ruled on the priority of a Continental Shelf over a Extended Continental Shelf in the case of the territorial and maritime dispute between Colombia and Nicaragua.

Background

This section is an excerpt from Extended continental shelf § History and characteristics.

The creation and implementation of this legal concept, which allows coastal states to enjoy exclusive rights over vast oceanic territories, stems from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), specifically in Part VI. This multilateral treaty was approved in April 1982 and came into force on November 16, 1994, a year after its ratification by Guyana, which fulfilled the requirement that at least 60 signatory states ratify it.

The regulations developed and issued by UNCLOS have global application. The meeting of the states that are part of the convention established the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS), and the validation of the commission gives political and legal legitimacy. This commission is based at the United Nations headquarters in New York.

For a coastal state to acquire rights over scientific continental shelves, it must rigorously follow specific steps. First, it must submit a detailed report to the CLCS, in which the state must demonstrate its rights over a specific area, outlined in a cartographic presentation. This process must consider the scientific-technical guidelines established by UNCLOS, and the report must be based on extensive data collection, including surveys and various scientific analyses, such as gravimetric, bathymetric, magnetometric, geological, geophysical, morphological, seismic, sedimentological studies, etc. Specialists in multiple disciplines, including oceanography, hydrography, geography, cartography, law, and international law, participate in this effort.

The CLCS, through a subcommission of seven members from a total of 21 technical experts in hydrography, geophysics, and geology, reviews the claim. They carefully examine the state's arguments, the technical data, and the accompanying maps. The commission can request clarifying meetings, make recommendations for modifications, or provide scientific-technical advice, potentially reprocessing the submitted data. After completing the analysis, the subcommission issues draft recommendations, which are then approved by the full commission. If the state follows these recommendations, the new limits are validated. If the commission finds excessive extensions, it may recommend adjustments, leaving disputed sections in suspense. The state may accept or revise its claim, and after further review, the commission may finally validate the submission.

Under UNCLOS Article 76.8, once the CLCS validates a state's outer limit, it is definitive and binding, enforceable against third-party states, and internationally mandatory.

Legally, the boundary is drawn by the state itself, with the CLCS only providing recommendations to ensure compliance with UNCLOS requirements. This ensures that the extension aligns with the rights developed under the convention.

The coastal state will submit to the secretary-general of the United Nations cartography, geodetic data, and additional information describing the new outer limit, permanently established, who upon receiving them will give them appropriate dissemination so that such limits are respected by the community of nations.

Formulas for measuring the outer edge of the continental margin

This section is an excerpt from Extended continental shelf § Formulas for measuring the outer edge of the continental margin.
Schematic cross section of a continental shelf.   Sediment   Rock   Mantle

UNCLOS, in Article 76, established complex scientific-technical guidelines that all coastal states must follow when estimating the extent of their continental shelf. These guidelines are synthesized into a combination of 4 rules—2 formulas and 2 restrictions. These standards were debated and agreed upon over several years, finally being approved in New York City on May 13, 1999, during the fifth session.

The procedure for states wishing to expand their maritime area begins with locating the foot of the continental slope, defined as the point of greatest change in gradient at its base. Once this point is identified, formula lines are drawn to find the farthest outer envelope, which will correspond to the outer edge of the continental shelf that the state intends to defend. Each state will choose the formula to use in each section, applying the most convenient based on seabed features and distances, to achieve the greatest possible extension of exclusive continental shelf.

Each formula was proposed by a geologist, and its technical name bears the scientist's last name:

Gardiner formula or sediment thickness formula

Its application results in a line drawn through fixed points where the sedimentary rock thickness is at least 1% of the shortest distance between that point and the foot of the slope.

Hedberg formula or distance formula

When applied, a line is drawn through fixed points located no more than 60 nautical miles from the foot of the continental slope.

Subsequently, the proposal obtained is evaluated through the belonging test, in which it must be demonstrated that the continental shelf extends beyond 200 nautical miles measured from the baselines.

In the next step, restriction rules are applied, which are two:

  • No point of the claimed area can exceed 350 nautical miles measured from the baselines;
  • No point of the claimed area can exceed a distance of 100 nautical miles measured from the line where the 2500-meter isobath is located.
By combining the selected formula in the segment with the restrictions applied, the outer limits of the extended continental shelf are traced, with all segments ultimately joining in a continuous line.

Criteria in cases of disputed maritime territories

This section is an excerpt from Extended continental shelf § Disputed maritime territories. The procedures established by UNCLOS are based on the principle that "land dominates the sea," meaning the status of maritime spaces legitimated by its bodies derives from the status of the coastal landmasses. If the CLCS encounters overlapping jurisdiction claims or pending conflicts during the extension process—i.e., ocean areas claimed by two or more countries, including those projected from disputed islands—any submission concerning those areas will not be examined or evaluated, as the commission cannot intervene on the substantive issue. Instead, the tracing or definitive allocation will be postponed, subject to the outcome of other legal bodies or negotiation mechanisms appropriate to the nature of these disputes, such as treaties, settlements, negotiations between the parties, mediation, rulings from international courts, etc. Only if the claimants submit a joint presentation to the CLCS—a suggestion that has even been encouraged by the commission itself—or express their consent, will the delimitation not prejudice the final legal settlement.

See also

References

  1. Juan Ignacio Ipinza Mayor (December 2019). "La Plataforma Continental de Chile en La Zona del Cabo de Hornos y Paso Drake: Tiempo de Definiciones" (PDF). Center for Research and Strategic Studies (in Spanish). ISSN 0719-4110. Retrieved November 21, 2024.
  2. "Chile y Argentina: ¿Qué es la plataforma continental y cuál es el conflicto?" (in Spanish). Duna. August 30, 2021. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  3. The 1984 Treaty says about the maritime border: Artículo 7°. El límite entre las respectivas soberanías sobre el mar, suelo y subsuelo de la República Argentina y de la República de Chile en el Mar de la Zona Austral a partir del término de la delimitación existente en el Canal Beagle,...
  4. "Chile and Argentina dispute the continental shelf south of their countries" (in Spanish). CNN en Español. 2 September 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  5. "Argentine press unanimously speaks of a "diplomatic conflict" and echoes official rejection of legitimate Chilean publication of the outer limit of the continental shelf extending 200 nautical miles from Punta Puga to the Diego Ramírez Islands" (in Spanish). Infogate. 29 September 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  6. "Argentina and Chile clash over a maritime dispute in the far southern tip of the Americas" (in Spanish). El País. 3 September 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  7. Jorge Guzmán (2017). "La plataforma continental extendida: El caso de Chile y Argentina en el mar austral y la Antártica". Revista de Marina (in Spanish). 957: 12–17. ISSN 0034-8511.
  8. Manzano, Karen; Jiménez, Diego (2023). "Continental Shelf and Chilean Antarctica: Historical Background, Geopolitics, and Natural Resources" (in Spanish). ANEPE. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  9. "Extended continental shelf in Antarctica and Chile's situation". Revista Marina. 17 August 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  10. "Argentine continental shelf: The new dispute with the United Kingdom and Chile's role". Biobío. 30 March 2016. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  11. "The area in the Drake Passage that generates a territorial dispute between Argentina and Chile" (in Spanish). BBC Mundo. 10 September 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  12. "Tension between Chile and Argentina over the continental shelf" (in Spanish). La Tinta. 2 September 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  13. Edwin Ocampo Marquina (24 August 2023). "Continental Shelf and Maritime Sovereignty: An Argentine-Chilean Controversy". Peru: CEEEP. Retrieved 18 October 2024.
  14. Carlos Olaf Sarabia (7 April 2023). "Antarctic Claims: Racing for the seas and not the lands - Argentina and Chile". London Politica. Retrieved 18 October 2024.
  15. "Chile and Argentina's Maritime Dispute Intensifies as Elections Approach". StateCraft. 8 September 2021. Retrieved 18 October 2024.
  16. ^ "Nueva controversia en el mar de la zona austral". August 31, 2024. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
  17. Manzano, Karen (2021). "Antarctic projection and the continental shelf: Interests and actions regarding the white continent" (PDF) (in Spanish). Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  18. ^ "Proyecto Plataforma Continental de Chile". Government of Chile. 2023. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
  19. "Argentina presents territorial claim". BBC. April 21, 2009. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
  20. "Crescent beyond point F of the 1984 Treaty of Peace and Friendship: new maritime dispute with Argentina". El Mostrador. March 23, 2023. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
  21. Luis Kohler Gary (March 2001). "The Presential Sea of Chile. Its current challenge" (PDF). Revista Marina.
  22. Fulvio Rossetti (August 2021). "No man's land, everyone's land. Unity and nature in the cultural figures of the Antarctic Peninsula and surrounding areas". Revista 180. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
  23. "Información Preliminar Indicativa de los límites exteriores de la Plataforma Continental y una descripción del estado de preparación y de la fecha prevista de envío de la presentación a la Comisión de Límites de la Plataforma Continental" (PDF). Government of Chile. May 2009. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
  24. "New limits dispute arises between Chile and Argentina". Merco Press. 30 August 2021. Retrieved 23 October 2024.
  25. "Argentina/Chile continental shelf dispute: "beware about arousing nationalism in electoral processes"". Merco Press. 7 September 2021. Retrieved 23 October 2024.
  26. "Deputies approved two laws to strengthen sovereignty over the Malvinas" (in Spanish). Página/12. 5 August 2020. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  27. "Chile seeks to define the Continental Shelf of the province of Easter Island". La Prensa Austral. June 16, 2024. Retrieved November 21, 2024.
  28. "The extended continental shelf around Easter Island and Salas y Gómez". Revista Marina. October 27, 2020. Retrieved November 21, 2024.
  29. "Piñera: "What Chile is doing is exercising its right and declaring its continental shelf"" (in Spanish). T13. 29 August 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  30. "Chile will ask the UN to recognize its maritime platform extension, which is already causing conflict with Argentina" (in Spanish). Infobae. 16 December 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  31. "Diplomatic conflict between Argentina and Chile over the Continental Shelf" (PDF) (in Spanish). Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Spain). 14 September 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  32. Juan Ignacio Ipinza Mayor (3 September 2021). "Southern Patagonian Ice Field and SHOA Chart No. 8" (in Spanish). InfoGate. Retrieved 15 December 2023.
  33. "After decrees: Argentina accuses Chile of trying to "appropriate" the southern continental shelf" (in Spanish). T13. 28 August 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  34. "Argentina claims Chile over an area it does not yet own". Revista Puerto. 30 August 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  35. "Foreign Minister Allamand states that "it seems unnecessary to engage in further public debate" with Argentina over the continental shelf". Emol. September 2, 2021. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  36. "Solá rejected the document signed by the PRO on the continental shelf: "They deny our rights," he said". Realidad Sanmartinense. August 31, 2021. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  37. "Chile vs. Argentina por la plataforma continental en el Mar Austral: perspectivas". La Capital de Mar del Plata. October 5, 2021. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
  38. "Plataforma continental chilena en el mar de la zona austral, un interés esencial del Estado". CEP Chile. January 28, 2023. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
  39. "Chile and Argentina agree to discuss ongoing continental shelf differences south of Cape Horn". Merco Press. 30 August 2021. Retrieved 23 October 2024.
  40. 7 September 2021. "Argentina sends Chile diplomatic note rejecting their "expansive vocation"". Merco Press. Retrieved 23 October 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  41. "Plataforma Continental Occidental del Territorio Chileno Antártico" (PDF). National Committee for the Continental Shelf - Chile. February 28, 2022. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
  42. "Chile to present the extended continental shelf west of Antarctica to the UN". Info Defensa. December 16, 2021. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  43. "Chile realiza sus presentaciones orales de Plataforma Continental extendida de Isla de Pascua y Antártica a la Comisión de Límites de la Plataforma Continental en Naciones Unidas". DIFROL. August 10, 2022. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
  44. "SHOA makes available an illustrative graphic of Chilean maritime jurisdiction areas". Armada de Chile. August 23, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  45. "Continental shelf: The stance Chile has maintained in response to Argentina's objections and the new frustration over SHOA maps". Emol. August 29, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  46. "Argentine Foreign Ministry sends formal complaint to Chile over Navy map including continental shelf". Emol. August 29, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  47. "Argentina protests over map with continental shelf created by Chilean Navy". Nuevo Poder. August 29, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  48. P. P. Camargo (1984). The Convention on the Law of the Sea: Text and Commentary. Editorial Temis Librería.
  49. ^ Á. J. García-Carriazo (2017). "The extension of the continental shelf in the South Atlantic: the maritime conflict between Argentina and the United Kingdom". Revista de Estudios Jurídicos (17). University of Jaén, Spain. ISSN 2340-5066.
  50. ^ Frida M. Armas Pfirter & Marcelo Ancarola (2017). "The outer limit of the Argentine continental shelf: success of a state policy sustained for almost 20 years". El Ojo del Cóndor (8). IGN: 44–47.
  51. Roberto Antonio Punte (December 2017). "A Political-Institutional Proposal for the Argentine Maritime Territory". Revista de la Escuela de Guerra Naval (63). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Argentine Navy: 13.
  52. F. Armas-Pfirter (2012). "The outer limit of the continental shelf: Argentina's submission and aspects of the practice followed to date". Revista Jurídica de Buenos Aires.
  53. F. Armas-Pfirter (2015). "The outer limit of the Argentine continental shelf – the longest limit and our border with humanity". Revista Res Diplomatica (1).
  54. Hernando Vicente Cañardo (2016). "The recommendations of the CLCS to Argentina and the delimitation of maritime spaces under international law". Doctrina, supplement on Constitutional Law (4472).
  55. "Judgment on the Maritime Boundary Dispute between Bangladesh and Myanmar (Bangladesh v. Myanmar), Case No. 16". TIDM. March 14, 2012. paragraph 407
  56. Mejía Hernández, J.; González Guerrero, C. H. (2017). Protección de la plataforma continental Ecuatoriana en el marco de la CONVEMAR (Thesis) (in Spanish). Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE.
  57. Meier Delgado, M. T. (2013). La plataforma continental en el Ecuador, propuesta de una posición geopolítica del Estado Ecuatoriano (Thesis) (in Spanish). Universidad de Guayaquil. Instituto Superior de Post-Grado en Ciencias Internacionales "Dr. Antonio Parra Velasco".
  58. Viozzi, Pablo Ariel (December 2017). "La extensión de la Plataforma Continental Argentina en la geopolítica del Atlántico Sur". Revista de la Escuela de Guerra Naval (in Spanish) (63). Publicación de la Armada Argentina: 121.
  59. Puceiro-Ripoll, Elías Roberto (1988). "Los nuevos caminos jurídicos del sistema antártico: la Convención para la reglamentación de las actividades sobre recursos minerales antárticos". Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales (in Spanish) (3–4).
  60. Orrego-Vicuña, Francisco Ramón (1994). Derecho Internacional de la Antártida (in Spanish). Chile: Dolmen Ediciones.
  61. Amstrong, P.; Forbes, V. (1997). The Falkland Islands and their Adjacent Maritime Area (Report). Durham University: International Boundaries Research Unit, Maritime Briefing.
  62. Marqués-Rueda, E. G. (2010). "La condición jurídica del Ártico y la Antártica: un asunto pendiente en la agenda jurídico-política de las relaciones internacionales contemporáneas". Revista de Relaciones Internacionales de la UNAM (in Spanish) (107).
  63. Del Castillo-Laborde, L. (2010). "La cuestión de las Islas Malvinas en el período 1983-2010". Publicación de la Asociación Profesional del Cuerpo Permanente del Servicio Exterior de la Nación Argentina (in Spanish) (3).
  64. Doyle, A. (February 1, 2008). "Antarctica: the next North Pole?". The International Herald Tribune.
Categories: