Diversity, equity, and inclusion

(Redirected from Diversity, equity and inclusion) Organizational framework "DEI" redirects here. For other uses, see DEI (disambiguation).

The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (July 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are organizational frameworks which seek to promote the fair treatment and full participation of all people, particularly groups who have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination on the basis of identity or disability. These three notions (diversity, equity, and inclusion) together represent "three closely linked values" which organizations seek to institutionalize through DEI frameworks. The concepts predate this terminology and other variations sometimes include terms such as belonging, justice, and accessibility. As such, frameworks such as inclusion and diversity (I&D), diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (DEIB), justice, equity, diversity and inclusion (JEDI or EDIJ), or diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility (IDEA, DEIA or DEAI) exist.

Diversity refers to the presence of variety within the organizational workforce, such as in identity and identity politics. It includes gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, age, culture, class, religion, or opinion. Equity refers to concepts of fairness and justice, such as fair compensation and substantive equality. More specifically, equity usually also includes a focus on societal disparities and allocating resources and "decision making authority to groups that have historically been disadvantaged", and taking "into consideration a person's unique circumstances, adjusting treatment accordingly so that the end result is equal." Finally, inclusion refers to creating an organizational culture that creates an experience where "all employees feel their voices will be heard", and a sense of belonging and integration.

DEI is most often used to describe certain training efforts, such as diversity training. Although DEI is best known as a form of corporate training, it also finds implementation within many types of organizations, such as within academia, schools, and hospitals. Into the 2020s, DEI efforts and policies have generated criticism, some directed at the specific effectiveness of its tools, such as diversity training, and its effect on free speech and academic freedom, as well as more broadly attracting criticism on political or philosophical grounds. In addition, the term "DEI" has gained traction as an ethnic slur towards minority groups in the United States.

History in the United States

DEI policy emerged from Affirmative action in the United States. The legal term "affirmative action" was first used in "Executive Order No. 10925", signed by President John F. Kennedy on 6 March 1961, which included a provision that government contractors "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin". It was used to promote actions that achieve non-discrimination. In September 1965, President Lyndon Johnson issued Executive Order 11246 which required government employers to "hire without regard to race, religion and national origin" and "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin." The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Neither executive order nor The Civil Rights Act authorized group preferences. The Senate floor manager of the bill, Senator Hubert Humphrey, declared that the bill “would prohibit preferential treatment for any particular group” adding “I will eat my hat if this leads to racial quotas.” However affirmative action in practice would eventually become synonymous with preferences, goals and quotas as upheld or struck down by Supreme Court decisions even though no law had been passed explicitly permitting discrimination in favor of disadvantaged groups. Some state laws explicitly banned racial preferences, and in response some laws have failed attempting to explicitly legalize race preferences.

Affirmative action is intended to alleviate under-representation and to promote the opportunities of defined minority groups within a society to give them equal access to that of the majority population. The philosophical basis of the policy has various rationales, including but not limited to compensation for past discrimination, correction of current discrimination, and the diversification of society. It is often implemented in governmental and educational settings to ensure that designated groups within a society can participate in all promotional, educational, and training opportunities.

The stated justification for affirmative action by its proponents is to help compensate for past discrimination, persecution or exploitation by the ruling class of a culture, and to address existing discrimination. More recently concepts have moved beyond discrimination to include diversity, equity and inclusion as motives for preferring historically underrepresented groups. In the famous Bakke decision of 1978, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, diversity now became a factor in constitutional law. The Supreme Court ruled quotas were illegal but it was allowable to consider race as a plus factor when trying to foster "diversity" in their classes.

Diversity themes gained momentum in the mid-1980s. At a time when President Ronald Reagan threatened to dismantle equality and affirmative action laws in the 1980s, equality and affirmative action professionals employed by US firms along with equality consultants, engaged in establishing the argument that a diverse workforce should be seen as a competitive advantage rather than just as a legal constraint. Basically, their message was, do not promote diversity because it is a legal mandate, but because it is good for business. From then on, researchers started to test a number of hypotheses on the business benefits of diversity and of diversity management, known as the business case of diversity.

In 2003, corporations spent $8 billion annually on diversity. In 2011 Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13583 concerning Diversity and inclusion. After the election of Donald Trump in 2016 and the ascent of the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements, Time magazine stated in 2019 that the DEI industry had "exploded" in size. Within academia, a 2019 survey found that spending on DEI efforts had increased 27 percent over the five preceding academic years.

One 2020 estimate placed the size of the global diversity and inclusion market at $7.5 billion, of which $3.4 billion was in the United States, projecting it to reach $17.2 billion by 2027. In 2021, Joe Biden signed several executive orders concerning DEI, including Executive Order 13985 and Executive Order 14035. In 2021, New York magazine stated "the business became astronomically larger than ever" after the murder of George Floyd in May 2020. The Economist has also stated that surveys of international companies indicate that the number of people hired for jobs with "diversity" or "inclusion" in the title more than quadrupled since 2010.

As of 2024, affirmative action rhetoric has been increasingly replaced by emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion, while nine states explicitly ban its use in the employment process. The Supreme Court in 2023 explicitly rejected affirmative action regarding race in college admissions in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard. The Court held that affirmative action programs "lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points. We have never permitted admissions programs to work in that way, and we will not do so today".

Methods and arguments

Further information: Diversity education, Equity in education, Inclusion (education), and Inclusion (disability rights)

In a 2018 article, proponents of DEI argued that because businesses and corporations exist within a larger world, they cannot be completely separated from the issues that exist in society. Therefore, the authors argue the need for DEI to improve coworker relations and teamwork. Through a DEI plan, organizations outline measures to be taken, including recruiting and retaining personnel, fostering effective communication channels, imparting relevant training, and regulating workplace conduct.

As of 2022, many academic institutions in the US have also started making commitments to DEI in different ways, including creating documents, programs and appointing dedicated staff members especially in the US. Many accreditation agencies now require supporting DEI. As of 2014, information on DEI for both students and professors was widespread in colleges and universities, with many schools requiring training and meetings on the topic. Many scholarships and opportunities at universities even have a secondary purpose of encouraging diversity. Diversity in higher education can be difficult, with diverse students often feeling reduced to fulfilling a 'diversity quota,' which can carry a high emotional tax.

Within healthcare, DEI reflective groups have been used to enhance the cultural sensitivity within mental health professionals. Such reflective spaces help improve mental health professionals reflexivity and awareness of DEI-related issues both within direct clinical work with clients, their families, and wider systems, as well as within professional supervision and teams. DEI positions also exist with the goal of creating allies for public school students through resources and staff training, in order to support students facing social disparities. Other proponents of allyship consider impromptu speaking a key skill for allies to operate on authenticity in everyday words and reactions.

Corporate

Main article: Diversity (business)

Diversity management as a concept appeared and gained momentum in the US in the mid-1980s. At a time when President Ronald Reagan threatened to dismantle equality and affirmative action laws in the US in the 1980s, equality and affirmative action professionals employed by US firms along with equality consultants, engaged in establishing the argument that a diverse workforce should be seen as a competitive advantage rather than just as a legal constraint. Basically, their message was, do not promote diversity because it is a legal mandate, but because it is good for business. Following the murder of George Floyd in 2020, some companies made substantial commitments to racial equity by establishing dedicated diversity, equity, and inclusion teams. In early 2024, the Washington Post reported that there is a trend in corporate America to reduce DEI positions and delegate the work to external consultants. The number of DEI jobs reached its highest point in early 2023, but subsequently decreased by 5 percent that year and has further shrunk by 8 percent in 2024. The attrition rate for DEI roles has been approximately twice as high as that of non-DEI positions. The scaling back of DEI initiatives has aligned with a rise in legal challenges and political opposition to systematic endeavors aimed at enhancing racial equity. Diversity management can be seen to "leverage organisational diversity to enhance organisational justice and achieve better business outcomes".

Several reports and academic studies, including one by McKinsey & Company, found a correlation between financial benefits and DEI. The study from McKinsey & Company was criticized in a paper by Jeremiah Green & John R. M. Hand, who found the impact of DEI programs to be statistically insignificant. At an aggregate level, a 2013 study found that birth country diversity of the labor force positively impacts a nation's long term productivity and income.Firm-level research has provided conditional support to the proposal that workforce diversity per se brings business benefits with it. In short, whether diversity pays off or not depends on environmental factors, internal or external to the firm.

Research suggests that attempts to promote diversity can provoke defensive responses: One study suggested that even incidental allusions to diversity during interviews promoted defensive reactions in White male applicants. Indeed, after diversity was mentioned, their performance during the interview deteriorated and their physiological arousal increased. DEI can also be one component of environmental, social, and governance (ESG).

Political and public reaction

Higher education

Since 2023, Republican-dominated state legislatures are considering bills that are against DEI efforts, primarily at state colleges and universities. The downgrading is taking place amid heavy legal pressures. Supreme Court in June 2023 upended established equal protection law with its decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard. This ruling, effectively eliminated the use of affirmative action in college admissions but did not directly affect employers. Nevertheless, since then conservative activists have organized in the states to dismantle race-conscious policies in various aspects of the economy. The Chronicle of Higher Education in February 2024 is tracking 73 bills introduced in state legislatures in 2023–2024. Of these 8 have become law, 25 failed to pass, and the rest are pending. Two bills became law in Florida and Texas; and one each in North Carolina, North Dakota, Tennessee, and Utah. Florida now prohibits public colleges from requiring “political loyalty tests” as a condition of employment, admission, or promotion. The other Florida law prohibits public colleges from spending state or federal funds on DEI unless required by federal law. One Texas law prohibits DEI practices or programs, including training, that are not in compliance with the state Constitution regarding equality. The other law bans DEI offices and staff, as well as mandatory diversity training. It also bans identity-based diversity statements that give preference regarding race or sex.

Entertainment and media

Within the film industry, several prominent actors and directors have criticized recently implemented diversity standards, such as at the Academy Awards. Beginning in 2024, to be eligible for a best-picture nomination at the Academy Awards, a film must meet two of four diversity standards in order to qualify.

Actor Richard Dreyfuss stated the Academy Award's diversity and inclusion standards "make me vomit", arguing that art should not be morally legislated. Several major film directors, who are voting members of the Academy Awards, anonymously expressed their opposition to the new diversity standards to The New York Post, with one describing them as "contrived". Film critic Armond White attacked the new standards as "progressive fascism", comparing them to the Hays Code.

Conservative media sources, such as National Review, have also been frequent critics of DEI, with contributor George Leff arguing it is authoritarian and anti-meritocratic.

Politics

In the 2020s, DEI came into the spotlight in American politics, especially in state legislatures in Texas and other Republican-controlled states. Several states are considering or have passed legislation targeting DEI in public institutions. In March 2023, the Texas House of Representatives passed a bill with a rider banning the use of state funds for DEI programs in universities and colleges. In May 2023, Texas passed legislation banning offices and programs promoting DEI at publicly funded colleges and universities. In Iowa, a bill to ban spending on DEI in public universities was also advanced in March 2023.

Several prominent Republicans positioned themselves as critics, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Texas Governor Greg Abbott, and 2024 presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. In January 2024, the Florida Board of Education banned federal or state money being used toward DEI programs in universities.

Military

Another significant point of political controversy has been the implementation of DEI frameworks in the military, with Republican politicians frequently criticizing the efforts as "divisive" and as harming military efficiency and recruiting, while Democrats have defended it as beneficial and strengthening. In July 2023, the House of Representatives voted to ban all DEI offices and initiatives within the Pentagon and military along partisan lines, with all Democrats and four Republican members also opposing. The Senate, under Democratic control, has not acted.

Public boycotts

Political opposition to corporate DEI efforts in the United States, particularly marketing criticized as "woke", have led to calls for boycotts of certain companies by activists and politicians; with notable examples being Disney, Target, Anheuser-Busch, and Chick-fil-A. Commentator Jonathan Turley of The Hill described such boycotts as possessing "some success".

Some of these companies' responses to the controversies have, in turn, sparked criticism from progressives of "walking back" or failing DEI commitments.

Public opinion

A June 2024 poll by The Washington Post and Ipsos found that 6 in 10 Americans believed that diversity, equity, and inclusion programs are "a good thing". A September 2024 poll by the Human Rights Campaign found that 80% of LGBT Americans would boycott a company that repealed its DEI programs and 19% would quit their job if their place of employment did.

Criticism and controversy

According to The Chronicle of Higher Education, institutions are making defensive adjustments to the criticism. Some schools are removing the word "diversity" from titles of offices and jobs; some are closing campus spaces set up for students according to identity; some are ending diversity training; and some have stopped asking all faculty and staff members for written affirmations of their commitment to diversity.

Diversity training

Further information: Diversity training

Diversity training, a common tool used in DEI efforts, has repeatedly come under criticism as being ineffective or even counterproductive. The Economist has stated that "the consensus now emerging among academics is that many anti-discrimination policies have no effect. What is worse, they often backfire." A regular claim is that these efforts mainly work to protect against litigation. It has also been criticized that there has been limited progress in achieving racial diversity in corporate leadership, particularly for Black professionals, due to a lack of diverse Chief Diversity Officers and a broad DEI focus that overlooks specific issues Black professionals face. A 2007 study of 829 companies over 31 years showed "no positive effects in the average workplace" from diversity training, while the effect was negative where it was mandatory. According to Harvard University professor in sociology and diversity researcher Frank Dobbin, "n average, the typical all-hands-on-deck, 'everybody has to have diversity training' – that typical format in big companies doesn't have any positive effects on any historically underrepresented groups like black men or women, Hispanic men or women, Asian-American men or women or white women."

Mandatory diversity statements within academia

The use of mandatory "diversity statements" within academia, wherein an applicant or faculty member outlines their "past contributions" and plans "for advancing diversity, equity and inclusion" if hired, has become controversial and sparked criticism.

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) has called such practices an attack on academic freedom, stating that "ague or ideologically motivated DEI statement policies can too easily function as litmus tests for adherence to prevailing ideological views on DEI" and "penalize faculty for holding dissenting opinions on matters of public concern". According to a 2022 survey conducted by the American Association of University Professors, one in five American colleges and universities include DEI criteria in tenure standards, including 45.6% of institutions with more than 5000 students. Some universities have begun to weigh diversity statements heavily in hiring processes. For example, University of California, Berkeley eliminated three-quarters of applicants for five faculty positions in the life sciences exclusively on the basis of their diversity statements in the hiring cycle of 2018–2019.

Contrary arguments for training are that, "implicit bias training is crucial for addressing racism, and bypassing it cannot be justified under the First Amendment. While free speech is a fundamental right, it is not absolute and must be balanced against public health needs, including combating systemic racism."

The Academic Freedom Alliance (AFA) has called for the end of required diversity statements, stating it "encourages cynicism and dishonesty" and erases "the distinction between academic expertise and ideological conformity". Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, who resigned from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology in protest against mandatory diversity statements, has stated that "most academic work has nothing to do with diversity, so these mandatory statements force many academics to betray their quasi-fiduciary duty to the truth by spinning, twisting, or otherwise inventing some tenuous connection to diversity". Other criticisms include that it "devalues merit"; is connected to affirmative action; that it violates the First Amendment; or functions as a loyalty oath.

A 1,500-person survey conducted by FIRE reported that the issue is highly polarizing for faculty members, with half saying their view more closely aligns with the description of diversity statements as "a justifiable requirement for a job at a university", while the other half saw it as "an ideological litmus test that violates academic freedom". According to Professor Randall L. Kennedy at Harvard University, "many academics at Harvard and beyond feel intense and growing resentment against the DEI enterprise because of features that are perhaps most evident in the demand for DEI statements", stating "I am a scholar on the left committed to struggles for social justice. The realities surrounding mandatory DEI statements, however, make me wince".

Several U.S. states have implemented legislation to ban mandatory diversity statements. In 2024, MIT announced that diversity statements "will no longer be part of applications for any faculty positions" at the university, becoming the first major university to abandon the practice.

Equity versus equality

According to DEI frameworks, "equity is different than equality in that equality implies treating everyone as if their experiences are exactly the same." A common identification, especially among critics, is of equality as meaning "equality of opportunities" and equity as "equality of outcome". This difference between equity and equality is also called Dilemma of Difference. Some have criticized the focus on equity rather than equality, arguing that the former runs contrary to a focus on merit or non-discrimination. Political scientist Charles Lipson has called "equity" a "mandate to discriminate", threatening the principle of "equality under the law", while Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson, a frequent critic of DEI, has called equity "the most egregious, self-righteous, historically-ignorant and dangerous" of the three titular notions of DEI. The debate has also branched into the realm of politics. Commenting on Governor of Texas Greg Abbott calling DEI initiatives "illegal", a spokesperson for his office stated: "The issue is not diversity – the issue is that equity is not equality. Here in Texas, we give people a chance to advance based on talent and merit."

Effects of DEI policies on free speech and academic freedom

In the 2020s, high-profile incidents of campus conflict have sparked debate about the effect of DEI on the campus environment, academic freedom, and free speech. The 2021 cancelling of a Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) guest lecture by astrophysicist Dorian Abbot after he criticized DEI programs led to media attention and controversy. As a result, MIT empaneled a committee to investigate the state of academic freedom at the university.

The 2023 disruption of a talk by Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Kyle Duncan at Stanford Law School sparked criticism and discussion in the media, with many focusing on the role of Associate DEI Dean Tirien Steinbach, who joined protesters in denouncing Duncan's presence on campus. In the wake of the incident, the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal opined that DEI offices have "become weapons to intimidate and limit speech". Steinbach replied with a piece entitled "Diversity and Free Speech Can Coexist at Stanford" that was published in the Journal the following week. Dean of Stanford Law School Jenny S. Martínez also published a ten-page document addressing the situation and clarifying Stanford's position on free speech. In it, Martinez stated that the university's commitment to DEI "can and should be implemented in ways that are consistent with its commitment to academic freedom and free speech" and that she believed that "the commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion actually means that we must protect free expression of all views." She added that the commitment would not take the form of "having the school administration announce institutional positions on a wide range of current social and political issues, make frequent institutional statements about current news events, or exclude or condemn speakers who hold views on social and political issues with whom some or even many in our community disagree." She criticized this definition of an "inclusive environment" by stating it "can lead to creating and enforcing an institutional orthodoxy."

The 2023 suicide of former Toronto principal Richard Bilkszto led to a new wave of controversy surrounding DEI in the workplace and its impact on freedom of expression. Bilkszto had earlier filed a lawsuit against the Toronto District School Board in the wake of a 2021 incident at a DEI training seminar; Bilkszto was later diagnosed with "anxiety secondary to a workplace event", and claimed the session and its aftermath had destroyed his reputation. Bilkszto's lawyer has publicly linked this incident and its aftermath with his death. In the wake of Bilkszto's death, Ontario Minister of Education Stephen Lecce stated he had asked for a review and "options to reform professional training and strengthen accountability on school boards so this never happens again", calling Bilkszto's allegations before his death "serious and disturbing". Bilkszto's death generated international attention and renewed debate on DEI and freedom of speech. According to The Globe and Mail, the incident has also been "seized on by a number of prominent right-wing commentators looking to roll-back initiatives." The anti-racism trainer involved in the incident has stated they welcome the review by Lecce, and stated that the incident has been "weaponized to discredit and suppress the work of people committed ".

Antisemitism

DEI has been criticized for not focusing on antisemitism. According to Andria Spindel of the Canadian Antisemitism Education Foundation, antisemitism has been largely ignored in the DEI curriculum.

Tabia Lee, a former DEI director at De Anza College in California and DEI critic, has criticized DEI for what she says is fostering antisemitism. According to the Brandeis Center, the DEI committee at Stanford University said that "Jews, unlike other minority group, possess privilege and power, Jews and victims of Jew-hatred do not merit or necessitate the attention of the DEI committee" after two students complained about antisemitic incidents on campus.

Following a wave of antisemitic incidents on American campuses in 2023–2024, several Republican congressmen laid the blame on DEI, with Burgess Owens stating DEI programs "are anything but inclusive for Jews". DEI's lack of inclusion of Jews and contribution to antisemitism were similarly criticized by businessman Bill Ackman and columnist Heather Mac Donald. Following the 2023 United States Congress hearing on antisemitism at the University of Pennsylvania, one donor pulled a $100 million donation "because he thought the school was prioritizing D.E.I. over enhancing the business school's academic excellence."

Politicization and ideology

DEI has according to some critics become a distinct ideology or "political agenda", leading to a politicization of universities. Fareed Zakaria, a commentator on CNN, has criticized American universities for "aving gone so far down the ideological path" that "these universities and these presidents cannot make the case clearly that at the center of a university is the free expression of ideas." He opines that "he most obvious lack of diversity at universities, political diversity, which clearly affects their ability to analyze many issues, is not addressed."

Conservative activists in the United States such as Stephen Miller and Edward Blum have alleged that corporate DEI programs are a form of reverse discrimination against whites. While such complaints have historically been a small fraction of employment discrimination litigation, U.S. courts have seen an increase in reverse discrimination claims since 2020, with some individual plaintiffs being awarded damages against companies such as Starbucks and Novant Health.

Dog-whistle diversity

Author Christine Michel Carter coined the term "dog-whistle diversity" for Time in 2017. Influenced by the phrase "dog whistle politics", dog whistle diversity is defined as the hiring of groups who have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination by organizations for the social aspect of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG). To investors and stakeholders, hiring these groups sends a coded message that the organization is more open to a diverse workforce, but to the groups hired it suggests the organization lacks effective diversity management or inclusion.

Disability community

According to some critics, DEI initiatives inadvertently sideline disabled people. Writing for The Conversation in 2017, college professor Stephen Friedman said that, "Organizations who are serious about DEI must adopt the frame of producing shared value where business and social goods exist side-by-side". According to a Time article in 2023, "People with disabilities are being neglected".

This view has been echoed by a number of DEI leaders and activists. Sara Hart Weir, the former president and CEO of the National Down Syndrome Society and co-founder of the Commission for Disability Employment, argues that when deliberating on the vision of DEI success in the United States, policymakers, and employers need to take proactive measures to engaging with people with disabilities who they historically ignored. Corinne Gray has argued that, "If you embrace diversity, but ignore disability, you're doing it wrong."

Diversity hire label

Diversity hire, equity hire, or DEI hire, are disparaging and controversial labels for persons from underrepresented groups, which are, according to this label, assumed to be less qualified and have supposedly received preferential treatment due to DEI policies. Wording of some DEI initiatives can backfire and contribute to the self-perception of the hired person that they would not have been hired solely based on formal merit and have only been hired due to a combination of their underrepresented identity and formal merit. The term diversity hire can refer to problematic hiring strategies such as tokenism. The term "DEI", when used as a term to disparage people (particularly Black Americans), has been described as an ethnic slur.

References

"'DEI' – on Dictionary.com". dictionary.com. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
^ "What is diversity, equity, and inclusion?". McKinsey & Company. 17 August 2022. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"What is Inclusion & Diversity?". The Insurance Institute of London. Retrieved 18 July 2024.
Read, Bridget (26 May 2021). "Inside the Booming Diversity-Equity-and-Inclusion Industrial Complex". The Cut. Retrieved 21 September 2022.
"Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging (DEIB)". bi.edu. BI Norwegian Business School. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"The Office of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging". University of Kansas. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
Hammond, J. W.; Brownell, Sara E.; Kedharnath, Nita A.; Cheng, Susan J.; Byrd, W. Carson (23 September 2021). "Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote Justice, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion". Scientific American. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"Office of Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Justice (EDIJ)". Lesley University. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA)". Indiana Arts Commission. 30 April 2018. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"Definitions of Diversity, Equity, Accessibility, and Inclusion". American Alliance of Museums. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"Executive Order on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Federal Workforce". whitehouse.gov. 25 June 2021. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
^ Alfonseca, Kiara (10 February 2023). "DEI: What does it mean and what is its purpose?". ABC News. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Definitions". University of Washington. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"Diversity, Equity & Inclusion". Code for America. Retrieved 23 March 2022.
Grubbs, Vanessa (23 July 2020). "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion That Matter". New England Journal of Medicine. 383 (4): e25. doi:10.1056/NEJMpv2022639. PMID 32649073. S2CID 220465926.
Rosenkranz, Kari M.; Arora, Tania K.; Termuhlen, Paula M.; Stain, Steven C.; Misra, Subhasis; Dent, Daniel; Nfonsam, Valentine (July 2021). "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Medicine: Why It Matters and How do We Achieve It?". Journal of Surgical Education. 78 (4): 1058–1065. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.11.013. PMID 33279427. S2CID 227521028.
^ Rahman, Khaleda (30 March 2024). "Is DEI a racial slur? Rise in term outrages Black Americans". Newsweek. Retrieved 4 August 2024.
^ Warfield, Rafiel Deon (1 August 2024). "The Right Is Trying to Turn 'DEI' Into a Slur. Don't Let Them". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved 4 August 2024.
See the concluding chapter, "Demise of Affirmative Action in the Age of Diversity," in Terry H. Anderson, The Pursuit of Fairness: A History of Affirmative Action (2004) pp. 217–273.
"President Kennedy's E.O.10925: Seedbed of Affirmative Action" (PDF). Society for History in the Federal Government. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 October 2020. Retrieved 20 August 2020.
A Brief History of Affirmative Action Archived 12 May 2015 at the Wayback Machine, University of California, Irvine (access date 16 May 2015)
Executive Order 11246
"Today's racial quotas? Senator Humphrey would've eaten his hat". Family News Network. 20 January 2022. Retrieved 17 July 2023.
"Affirmative Action". Harvard Blogs. Harvard Law School. Archived from the original on 18 May 2015. Retrieved 30 April 2015.
Tierney, William G. (1997). "The Parameters of Affirmative Action: Equity and Excellence in the Academy". Review of Educational Research. 67 (2): 165–196. doi:10.3102/00346543067002165. ISSN 0034-6543. JSTOR 1170625.
"Equal Opportunity & Affirmative Action Policy Statement". chatham.edu. Archived from the original on 1 May 2015. Retrieved 30 April 2015.
Sowell, Thomas (2004). Affirmative Action Around the World: An Empirical Study, Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-10199-6
Affirmative Action. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2009.
Steven M. Gillon, "The strange career of affirmative action: the Civil Rights Act of 1964" in his "That's Not What We Meant to Do": Reform and Its Unintended Consequences in Twentieth-Century America (WW Norton, 2000) p. 152.
The Court ruled: “The diversity that furthers a compelling state interest encompasses a far broader array of qualifications and characteristics of which racial or ethnic origin is but a single though important element," quoted in Brent K., Nakamura, and Lauren B. Edelman, "Bakke at 40: How diversity matters in the employment context." UC Davis Law Review 52 (2018): 2627–2679 at p. 2629. online
Erin Kelly, and Frank Dobbin, "How affirmative action became diversity management: Employer response to antidiscrimination law, 1961 to 1996." American Behavioral Scientist 41.7 (1998): 960–984. online
^ Sweeting, Karen D. (2023). "Executive Orders: Mandating Inclusion in the Federal Workplace: Insights from Federal Executive Departments' Strategic Plans". Public Personnel Management. 52 (4): 590–623. doi:10.1177/00910260231187542. ISSN 0091-0260.
Newkirk, Pamela (10 October 2019). "Diversity Has Become a Booming Business. So Where Are the Results?". Time. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"An Insight Investigation: Accounting for Just 0.5% of Higher Education's Budgets, Even Minimal Diversity Funding Supports Their Bottom Line". Insight. 16 October 2019. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
"Global Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) Industry". Global Industry Analysts. October 2022. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Bridget Read, "Reckoning with as Reckoning: Doing the Work at Work What are companies desperate for diversity consultants actually buying?" New York: The Cut, May 26, 2021 online.
^ "Workplace diversity programmes often fail, or backfire". The Economist. 25 August 2022. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Nino Monea, "Next on the Chopping Block: The Litigation Campaign against Race-Conscious Policies Beyond Affirmative Action in University Admissions." (SSRN 4440549, 2023) online
Schwarzschild, Maimon and Heriot, Gail L., Race Preferences, Diversity, and Students for Fair Admissions: A New Day, a New Clarity (January 16, 2024). SMU Law Review, Forthcoming (2024), San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 24-003, online
Ariana Baio, "Supreme Court strikes down affirmative action, banning colleges from factoring race in admissions: In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled higher education institutions may not consider race as a factor in admissions" The Independent (29 June 2023) online
Dan Morgan, "Supreme Court rejects affirmative action at colleges as unconstitutional" CNBC June 29, 2023 online
Cara McClellan, "When Claims Collide: Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and the Meaning of Discrimination." U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper 23-20 (2023). online
Gill, Gurwinder Kaur; McNally, Mary Jane; Berman, Vin (16 August 2018). "Effective diversity, equity, and inclusion practices". Healthcare Management Forum. 31 (5): 196–199. doi:10.1177/0840470418773785. PMID 30114938. S2CID 52019098.
Noah (7 January 2023). "Equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in the workplace". Diversity And Inclusion. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 8 March 2023.
University, Carnegie Mellon. "Homepage – Diversity, Equity and Inclusion – Carnegie Mellon University". www.cmu.edu. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
"Diversity, Equity and Inclusion – University of Houston". uh.edu. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
Bohanon, Mariah (16 March 2022). "DEI in Accreditation". Insight Into Diversity. Retrieved 1 October 2022.
"Diversity and Inclusion in the Standards | AACSB". www.aacsb.edu. Retrieved 1 October 2022.
Harris-Hasan, Alandra (9 October 2014). "What Is Really Going On: Black Graduate Students in Higher Education". Diverse Issues in Higher Education. 31 (18): 58.
Bolster, Alexander; Jameel, Leila (31 January 2024). "Evaluating the experiences of a staff equality, diversity and inclusion reflective space". Reflective Practice. 25 (2): 227–250. doi:10.1080/14623943.2024.2309882. ISSN 1462-3943.
Ph.D, Jay P. Greene. "Equity Elementary: 'Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion' Staff in Public Schools". The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 23 March 2022.
Keshri, Vikash Ranjan; Bhaumik, Soumyadeep (September 2022). "The feudal structure of global health and its implications for decolonisation". BMJ Global Health. 7 (9): e010603. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010603. PMC 9516156. PMID 36167407.
Obah Jr., Herbert (2023). "Black and Asian Allyship Through Impromptu Speaking". In Sha, Mandy; Lee, Cassandra (eds.). If we can do it, you can, too!. Amazon Digital Services LLC – Kdp. pp. 13–16. ISBN 9798379235413.
Kelly, Erin; Dobbin, Frank (April 1998). "How Affirmative Action Became Diversity Management: Employer Response to Antidiscrimination Law, 1961 to 1996". American Behavioral Scientist. 41 (7): 960–984. doi:10.1177/0002764298041007008.
^ Telford, Taylor (18 February 2024). "As DEI gets more divisive, companies are ditching their teams". Washington Post.
Cross-cultural and diversity management intersections: lessons for attracting and retaining international assignees
Hunt, Vivian, Dennis Layton, and Sara Prince. "Diversity matters." McKinsey & Company 1.1 (2015): 15–29.
^ Alesina, Alberto; Harnoss, Johann; Rapoport, Hillel (January 2013). "Birthplace Diversity and Economic Prosperity". Working Paper Series. doi:10.3386/w18699. S2CID 34712861 – via National Bureau of Economic Research.
Risberg, Annette; Corvellec, Hervé (2022). "The significance of trying : How organizational members meet the ambiguities of diversity". Gender, Work & Organization. 29 (6): 1849–1867. doi:10.1111/gwao.12883. hdl:11250/3030684. S2CID 249855715.
Smulowitz, Stephen; Becerra, Manuel; Mayo, Margarita (October 2019). "Racial diversity and its asymmetry within and across hierarchical levels: The effects on financial performance". Human Relations. 72 (10): 1671–1696. doi:10.1177/0018726718812602.
Mackintosh, James (28 June 2024). "Diversity Was Supposed to Make Us Rich. Not So Much". Wall Street Journal.
Green, Jeremiah; Hand, John R. M. (2021). "Diversity matters/delivers/wins revisited in S&P 500® firms". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3849562.
Bell, Myrtle P.; Berry, Daphne P. (November 2007). "Viewing Diversity Through Different Lenses: Avoiding a Few Blind Spots". Academy of Management Perspectives. 21 (4): 21–25. doi:10.5465/AMP.2007.27895336.
Dwyer, Sean; Richard, Orlando C; Chadwick, Ken (December 2003). "Gender diversity in management and firm performance: the influence of growth orientation and organizational culture". Journal of Business Research. 56 (12): 1009–1019. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00329-0.
Richard, O. C.; Barnett, T.; Dwyer, S.; Chadwick, K. (1 April 2004). "Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions". Academy of Management Journal. 47 (2): 255–266. JSTOR 20159576.
Risberg, Annette; Corvellec, Hervé (2022). "The significance of trying: How organizational members meet the ambiguities of diversity". Gender, Work & Organization. 29 (6): 1849–1867. doi:10.1111/gwao.12883. hdl:11250/3030684. S2CID 249855715.
Dover, Tessa L.; Major, Brenda; Kaiser, Cheryl R. (January 2016). "Members of high-status groups are threatened by pro-diversity organizational messages". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 62: 58–67. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.006. ISSN 0022-1031.
Llopis, Glenn (8 December 2022). "ESG And DEI: Why They Matter For Long-Term Sustainability". Forbes. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
Chronicle Staff, "DEI Legislation Tracker: Explore where college diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts are under attack" Chronicle of Higher Education February 16, 2024.
Buchanan, Kyle (9 September 2020). "The Oscars' New Diversity Rules Are Sweeping but Safe". The New York Times.
Murphy, Jim K. (6 May 2023). "Richard Dreyfuss Slams New Diversity Requirements for Oscar Contention: 'They Make Me Vomit'". Variety.
Giang-Paunon, Stephanie (17 June 2023). "Oscars voters slam Hollywood inclusion standards amid new diversity rules". Fox News.
White, Armond (11 September 2020). "Our Sovietized Oscars". National Review.
"Diversity, Equity, Inclusion – Manipulating Words for Political Goals". National Review. 15 March 2021.
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, "State Legislatures Targeting DEI in Higher Education" (Jun 29, 2023) online
Menchaca, Megan. "Texas House panel OKs funding ban for college DEI programs in draft budget. Here's why". Austin American-Statesman. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
Burch, Audra D. S. (29 May 2023). "Texas Lawmakers Pass Ban on D.E.I. Programs at State Universities". New York Times. Retrieved 4 June 2023.
"Senate Bill 17". capitol.texas.gov. Retrieved 4 June 2023.
Sostaric, Katarina (1 March 2023). "Bill to ban DEI spending at public universities advances in Iowa House". Iowa Public Radio. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"Ron DeSantis announces plan to block DEI programs in state colleges". The Guardian. 2 February 2023. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Terruso, Julia; Brennan, Chris (20 June 2023). "Who is Vivek Ramaswamy? A look at the GOP presidential candidate's first visit to Philadelphia". Inquirer.
"Florida board bans use of state, federal dollars for DEI programs at state universities – CBS Miami". www.cbsnews.com. 24 January 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2024.
Shane III, Leo (19 July 2023). "Military academies' diversity efforts draw GOP concerns, Dem support". militarytimes.com. Sightline Media Group. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
Carbonaro, Giulia (14 July 2023). "Republicans Ban All Racial Diversity Offices Inside Military". Newsweek. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
Uebelacker, Erik (13 July 2023). "House Approves GOP Measure Banning Military DEI Initiatives by One Vote". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
"Bud Light loses top US beer spot after promotion with transgender influencer". The Guardian. 14 June 2023. Retrieved 1 January 2024.
Valinsky, Jordan (2 June 2023). "How Chick-fil-A became a target for going 'woke'". CNN. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
Mordowanec, Nick (30 May 2023). "Chick-fil-A Faces a Conservative Revolt". Newsweek. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
"Consumers fight back, with some success, against brands gone woke". The Hill. 27 May 2023.
Stewart, Emily (19 May 2023). "The Bud Light boycott, explained as much as is possible". Vox. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
Reuter, Dominick (24 May 2023). "Target workers say the abrupt removal of Pride month displays has alienated some LGBTQ employees". Business Insider. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
Telford, Taylor; Felton, Emmanuel; Guskin, Emily (18 June 2024). "Most Americans approve of DEI, according to Post-Ipsos poll". The Washington Post. Retrieved 30 August 2024.
Todd, Jared (4 September 2024). "New Data Indicates LGBTQ+ Community Backlash Against Companies Backing Down from Diversity, Inclusion Commitments". Human Rights Campaign. Retrieved 26 November 2024.
Alecia Taylor, "3 Ways That Anti-DEI Efforts Are Changing How Colleges Operate" Chronicle of Higher Education (January 18, 2024)
Dobbin, Frank; Kalev, Alexandra (September 2018). "Why Doesn't Diversity Training Work? The Challenge for Industry and Academia". Anthropology Now. 10 (2). Taylor & Francis Online: 48–55. doi:10.1080/19428200.2018.1493182. S2CID 158262607. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
^ Nathoo, Zulekha (17 June 2021). "Why ineffective diversity training won't go away". BBC. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Morrison, Richard (5 March 2022). "Commentary: Diversity training is unpopular because it doesn't work (but companies could change that)". Competitive Enterprise Institute. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
^ Bregman, Peter (12 March 2012). "Diversity Training Doesn't Work". Harvard Business Reviews. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Brownlee, Dana (11 August 2022). "This Is Why Corporate DEI Tragically Fails Many Black Professionals". Forbes.
^ "American universities are hiring based on devotion to diversity". The Economist. 4 February 2023. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"FIRE Statement on the Use of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Criteria in Faculty Hiring and Evaluation". Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
"The 2022 AAUP Survey of Tenure Practices". American Association of University Professors. 16 May 2022. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
Heald, Rebecca; Wildermuth, Mary. "Initiative to Advance Faculty Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in the Life Science at UC Berkeley" (PDF). ofew.berkeley.edu. University of California, Berkeley. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
Varlack, Tiega-Noel (16 August 2023). "Bypassing implicit bias training is not a First Amendment right".
"AFA Calls for An End to Required Diversity Statements". Academic Freedom Alliance. 22 August 2022. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
Tuccille, J.D. (30 September 2022). "Mandated Diversity Statement Drives Jonathan Haidt To Quit Academic Society". Reason. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
Camp, Emma (19 September 2022). "Want An Academic Job? Start Preparing Your DEI Statement". Reason. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
Sailer, John (7 September 2022). "Higher Ed's New Woke Loyalty Oaths". Tablet. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
Jacoby, Jeff (9 April 2024). "Diversity, yes. Diversity statements, no". Boston Globe. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
^ Marijolovic, Kate (28 February 2023). "Professors Are Sharply Divided on DEI Statements in Hiring, Survey Finds". Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
Kennedy, Randall L. (2 April 2024). "Mandatory DEI Statements Are Ideological Pledges of Allegiance. Time to Abandon Them". The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
Sailer, John (5 May 2024). "MIT becomes first elite university to ban diversity statements". UnHerd. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
"DEI Definitions". University of Iowa. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Minow, Martha (21 September 2021). "Equality vs. Equity". American Journal of Law and Equality. 1 (1). MIT: 167–193. doi:10.1162/ajle_a_00019. S2CID 240522063.
"Diversity, equality and the law in the UK" (PDF). UK Parliament. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Minow, Martha. "Learning to live with the dilemma of difference: Bilingual and special education." Law and Contemporary Problems 48.2 (1985): 157–211.
Lipson, Charles (4 March 2021). "'Equity' Is a Mandate to Discriminate". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Peterson, Jordan (10 May 2019). "Jordan Peterson: When the left goes too far – the dangerous doctrine of equity". The National Post. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
"Freedom of Speech, Diversity, and Inclusion". American Council of Education. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
"New FIRE model legislation takes on DEI bureaucracy's chilling effect on campus". Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. 16 February 2023. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Friedman, Jonathan (20 February 2020). "When Diversity and Inclusion Clash with Free Speech – And Why They Don't Have To". PEN America. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Powell, Michael (21 October 2021). "M.I.T.'s Choice of Lecturer Ignited Criticism. So Did Its Decision to Cancel". New York Times. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
"Politics overshadowing scientific work". CNN. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
^ "The Illusion of Consensus: An Interview with Professor Jeffrey Flier, M.D." Academic Freedom Alliance. 21 March 2023. Retrieved 31 March 2023.
Morey, Alex; Conza, Sabrina (13 March 2023). "Stanford Law students shout down 5th Circuit judge: A post-mortem". Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Millhiser, Ian (14 March 2023). "A new Supreme Court case could be the most important transgender rights decision ever". Vox. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Goodman, Sylvia (22 March 2023). "Stanford Law's Diversity Dean Is 'on Leave' as Controversy Boils Over a Disrupted Speech". Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
"The Tyranny of the DEI Bureaucracy". Wall Street Journal. 17 March 2023. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
Steinbach, Tirien (23 March 2023). "Diversity and Free Speech Can Coexist at Stanford". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
"Stanford DEI Dean Escalates Battle against Law-School Dean" Ed Whelan, National Review, March 23, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Martinez, Jenny S. (22 March 2023). "SLS Letter from Dean" (PDF). Stanford Law School. Retrieved 3 April 2023.
^ "Anti-racism trainer accused of bullying principal who later died says she welcomes review". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. The Canadian Press. 28 July 2023. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
^ "Anti-racism trainer accused of bullying Toronto principal who later died welcomes Ontario review". The Globe and Mail. The Canadian Press. 29 July 2023. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
"Education minister orders review into allegations of TDSB principal who died by suicide". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. The Canadian Press. 25 July 2023. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
Blaff, Ari (24 July 2023). "Former Toronto Principal Bullied By Equity Consultants For His 'Whiteness' Commits Suicide, Leaves Family and Friends 'Reeling'". National Review. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
Abrams, Chaya M.; Armeni, Kelsey (2023). "The Lived Experiences of Anti-Semitism Encountered by Jewish Students on University Campuses: A Phenomenological Study" (PDF). American Journal of Qualitative Research. 7 (3): 172–191. doi:10.29333/ajqr/13482. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
Rosen, Armin (4 October 2022). "Campus Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) Excludes and Targets Jews". Tablet Mag. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
"Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Programming's Antisemitism Failures; Buffalo Shooting and Great Replacement Theory". American Jewish Committee. 19 May 2022. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
Spindel, Andria (8 August 2023). "DEI: Not diverse, equitable, or inclusive if antisemitism is ignored – opinion". Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
Carter, Ray (27 October 2023). "Amid DEI Backdrop, OU Students Condemn Israel". Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
Asimov, Nanette (14 May 2023). "'I declared myself not woke': What happened when a critic of anti-racism 'ideology' led DEI at a Bay Area college". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
"Overview of Complaints Filed Against Stanford University" (PDF). Brandeis Center. 15 June 2021. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
Knott, Katherine (15 November 2023). "House Republicans Blame DEI Programs for Rise in Campus Antisemitism". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
"CNBC Transcript: Pershing Square Capital Management CEO Bill Ackman Speaks with CNBC's 'Squawk Box' Today". CNBC. 6 November 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
Mac Donald, Heather (6 December 2023). "DEI Drives Campus Antisemitism". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
Saul, Stephanie (26 October 2023). "Who Decides Penn's Future: Donors or the University?". New York Times. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
^ Zakaria, Fareed. "Opinion: Why university presidents are under fire". CNN. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
Guynn, Jessica (20 December 2023). "DEI under siege: Why more businesses are being accused of 'reverse discrimination'". USA Today. Retrieved 17 September 2024.
^ "We Need to Talk About Dog-Whistle Diversity". Time. 29 November 2017. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
"Organizations are leaving disabled workers behind in their DEI efforts – here's how they can do better". The Conversation. 29 November 2017.
"Why Businesses Must Stop Disregarding People With Disabilities". Time. 12 January 2023.
"Op-Ed: Employers' diversity and equity efforts often overlook people with disabilities". CNBC. 21 April 2021.
"Disability fashion: Stephanie Thomas is shaking up the fashion industry". URevolution. 20 June 2019.
^ Hughes, Anne K.; Horner, Pilar S.; Ortiz, Daniel Vélez (2012). "Being the Diversity Hire: Negotiating Identity in an Academic Job Search". Journal of Social Work Education. 48 (3): 595–612. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2012.201000101. ISSN 1043-7797.
Alfonseca, Kiara (23 July 2024). "Kamala Harris faces racial 'DEI' attacks amid campaign for the 2024 presidency". ABC News. Retrieved 25 July 2024.
Popat, Aarthi; Leonard, Julia Anne (2024). "'I'm here for my gender, not my skill': Causal reasoning shapes beliefs about merit in response to DEI initiatives". Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 46. Retrieved 25 July 2024.

External links

"DEI Legislation Tracker" from Chronicle of Higher Education. Tracks state legislation that would close DEI offices, ban mandatory diversity training; prevent colleges from using DEI statements in hiring and promotion; or bar them for considering race, sex, ethnicity, or national origin in admissions or employment. Free subscription.

"Affirmative action is under attack. How did we get here" By Julian Mark, Taylor Telford and Emma Kumer Washington Post March 9, 2024, detailed chronology.

Categories:

Misplaced Pages