| Dupree v. Younger | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided May 25, 2023 | |
| Full case name | Dupree v. Younger |
| Docket no. | 22-210 |
| Citations | 598 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| A post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 is not required to preserve for appellate review a purely legal issue resolved at summary judgment. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Barrett, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 | |
Dupree v. Younger, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 is not required to preserve for appellate review a purely legal issue resolved at summary judgment.
See also
References
- Dupree v. Younger, No. 22-210, 598 U.S. ___ (2023).
- "Court rules for Maryland prison official on procedural issue". SCOTUSblog. 2023-05-31. Retrieved 2024-11-14.
External links
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |