Misplaced Pages

Edward Filmer

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
English dramatist For Sir Edward Filmer, 3rd Baronet (1683–1755), see Filmer baronets.

Edward Filmer (c.1654–1703) was an English dramatist.

Life

He was the second son of Sir Robert Filmer, 1st Baronet, of East Sutton, Kent, who died 22 March 1676, and his wife, Dorothy, daughter of Maurice Tuke of Layer Marney, Essex. In 1672 he was admitted as founder's kin fellow of All Souls' College, Oxford, and took the degree of B.A. on 17 December of that year, proceeding B.C.L. 21 February 1675, D.C.L. 27 October 1681. He was buried at East Sutton.

Works

Filmer wrote a lengthy blank verse tragedy, The Unnatural Brother (published London, 1697), adapted from an episode in Cassandre, a romance by Gauthier de Costes, seigneur de la Calprenède. In terms of plot, it is considered derivative of Othello, and The Villain by Thomas Porter in the same tradition. It was acted at the theatre in Little Lincoln's Inn Fields, and was received coldly. Part of this drama was reproduced by Pierre Antoine Motteux as The Unfortunate Couple; a short Tragedy, in The Novelty (1697). The Novelty was then used as the basis for a 1704 play, The Unnatural Couple.

Filmer in his tragedy was swimming against the tide of recent fashion–for the music of John Eccles, the productions of The Indian Queen as semi-opera and George Powell's Brutus of Alba—in excluding music from his tragedy, a position he defended in the introduction to the published text. He pointed to features that he considered important (restriction of the number of characters on the stage at one time, in particular) as belonging to a classical tradition in drama he valued; the later 17th century London audience never favoured them.

In a later work, Filmer defended the stage itself against the attacks of Jeremy Collier in a treatise A Defence of Plays (posthumous publication in 1707). He brought to bear the argument that Collier failed to understand "Stage-Discipline" (i.e. poetic justice). Collier replied in A Farther Vindication of the Short View (London, 1708).

Family

By license, dated 29 January 1687, Filmer married Archiballa, only daughter and heiress of Archibald Clinkard or Clenkard of Sutton Valence, Kent.

References

  1. ^ Burns, William E. "Filmer, Edward". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/9423. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  2. Berry, County Genealogies, Kent, p. 187
  3. ^ Stephen, Leslie, ed. (1889). "Filmer, Edward" . Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 18. London: Smith, Elder & Co.
  4. Derek Hughes (1996). English Drama, 1660–1700. Clarendon Press. p. 438. ISBN 978-0-19-811974-6.
  5. William J. Burling (1993). A Checklist of New Plays and Entertainments on the London Stage, 1700–1737. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press. p. 37. ISBN 978-0-8386-3451-6.
  6. Kathryn Lowerre (2009). Music and Musicians on the London Stage, 1695–1705. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 85. ISBN 978-0-7546-6614-1.
  7. A History of Restoration Drama 1660–1700. CUP Archive. p. 132. GGKEY:7PJ8436C4JF.
  8. A Defence of Plays, or the Stage Vindicated, from several Passages in Mr. Collier's Short View, &c. Wherein is offer'd the most probable method of Reforming our Plays. With a Consideration how far Vicious Characters may be allow'd on the Stage, London, 1707.
  9. Popson, Joseph John (1974). "Collier Controversy: a critical basis for understanding drama of the restoration period". Internet Archive. PhD dissertation. Retrieved 24 February 2016.
Attribution

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Stephen, Leslie, ed. (1889). "Filmer, Edward". Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 18. London: Smith, Elder & Co.

Categories: