Misplaced Pages

You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Spanish. (October 2023) Click for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the Spanish article. Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Misplaced Pages. Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 1,131 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Spanish Misplaced Pages article at ]; see its history for attribution. You may also add the template {{Translated|es|El efecto de realidad}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Misplaced Pages:Translation.

The effect of reality (French: effet de réel) is a textual device identified by Roland Barthes, the purpose of which was to establish literary texts as realistic.

History

Barthes first suggested this concept in his 1968 essay "The Reality Effect," in which he argues that untheorized descriptive "residues" of the text produce effects of reality through their dissembling of the tripartite sign. In the absence of any signified, Barthes argues, the textual signifiers for "real" objects had for their actual signifieds only the concept of realism itself; further, Barthes suggested that the origins of this textual device came through the development of an "aesthetic finality of language" present in the use of the rhetorical device of ecphrasis in "Alexandrian neo-rhetoric of the second century".

Barthes also showed that this effect of reality was a key problem of historical analysis and writing in that historical writing proclaimed an unproblematic realism that was in fact just this textual device in action. It was this aspect of the effect of reality that Ankersmit showed helped to explain both the evolution of historical enquiry and the problematic textual nature of history.

The concern with realism and the constructed nature of historical and literary facts that both Barthes and Ankersmit expressed is also to be found in the field of Discursive psychology; and Jonathan Potter has analysed similar problems and issues in his "Representing Reality".

Notes

1. Barthes 1989, The Reality Effect
2. Barthes 1989, The Discourse of History
3. Ankersmit 1989
4. Potter 1996

References

• Ankersmit, FR (1989). "The Reality Effect in the Writing of History: The Dynamics of Historiographical Topology". History and Tropology. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche.
• Barthes, R (1989). The Rustle of Language. Translated by R. Howard. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Potter, J (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.

This literary criticism-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e

• Historiography
• Literary criticism
• Literary criticism stubs