Misplaced Pages

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Misplaced Pages editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (April 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "First quantization" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (April 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Part of a series of articles about
Quantum mechanics
${\displaystyle i\hbar {\frac {d}{dt}}|\Psi \rangle ={\hat {H}}|\Psi \rangle }$Schrödinger equation
Introduction Glossary History
Background Classical mechanics Old quantum theory Bra–ket notation Hamiltonian Interference
Fundamentals Complementarity Decoherence Entanglement Energy level Measurement Nonlocality Quantum number State Superposition Symmetry Tunnelling Uncertainty Wave function Collapse
Experiments Bell's inequality CHSH inequality Davisson–Germer Double-slit Elitzur–Vaidman Franck–Hertz Leggett inequality Leggett–Garg inequality Mach–Zehnder Popper Quantum eraser Delayed-choice Schrödinger's cat Stern–Gerlach Wheeler's delayed-choice
Formulations Overview Heisenberg Interaction Matrix Phase-space Schrödinger Sum-over-histories (path integral)
Equations Dirac Klein–Gordon Pauli Rydberg Schrödinger
Interpretations Bayesian Consistent histories Copenhagen de Broglie–Bohm Ensemble Hidden-variable Local Superdeterminism Many-worlds Objective-collapse Quantum logic Relational Transactional Von Neumann–Wigner
Advanced topics Relativistic quantum mechanics Quantum field theory Quantum information science Quantum computing Quantum chaos EPR paradox Density matrix Scattering theory Quantum statistical mechanics Quantum machine learning
Scientists Aharonov Bell Bethe Blackett Bloch Bohm Bohr Born Bose de Broglie Compton Dirac Davisson Debye Ehrenfest Einstein Everett Fock Fermi Feynman Glauber Gutzwiller Heisenberg Hilbert Jordan Kramers Lamb Landau Laue Moseley Millikan Onnes Pauli Planck Rabi Raman Rydberg Schrödinger Simmons Sommerfeld von Neumann Weyl Wien Wigner Zeeman Zeilinger
v t e

First quantization is a procedure for converting equations of classical particle equations into quantum wave equations. The companion concept of second quantization converts classical field equations in to quantum field equations.

However, this need not be the case. In particular, a fully quantum version of the theory can be created by interpreting the interacting fields and their associated potentials as operators of multiplication, provided the potential is written in the canonical coordinates that are compatible with the Euclidean coordinates of standard classical mechanics. First quantization is appropriate for studying a single quantum-mechanical system (not to be confused with a single particle system, since a single quantum wave function describes the state of a single quantum system, which may have arbitrarily many complicated constituent parts, and whose evolution is given by just one uncoupled Schrödinger equation) being controlled by laboratory apparatuses that are governed by classical mechanics, for example an old fashion voltmeter (one devoid of modern semiconductor devices, which rely on quantum theory—however though this is sufficient, it is not necessary), a simple thermometer, a magnetic field generator, and so on.

History

Published in 1901, Max Planck deduced the existence and value of the constant now bearing his name from considering only Wien's displacement law, statistical mechanics, and electromagnetic theory. Four years later in 1905, Albert Einstein went further to elucidate this constant and its deep connection to the stopping potential of electrons emitted in the photoelectric effect. The energy in the photoelectric effect depended not only on the number of incident photons (the intensity of light) but also the frequency of light, a novel phenomena at the time, which would earn Einstein the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics. It can then be concluded that this was a key onset of quantization, that is the discretization of matter into fundamental constituents.

About eight years later Niels Bohr in 1913, published his famous three part series where, essentially by fiat, he posits the quantization of the angular momentum in hydrogen and hydrogen like metals. Where in effect, the orbital angular momentum ${\displaystyle L}$ of the (valence) electron, takes the form ${\displaystyle L=l\hbar }$, where ${\displaystyle l}$ is presumed a whole number ${\displaystyle 0,\,1,\,2,\,3,\,\ldots \,}$. In the original presentation, the orbital angular momentum of the electron was named ${\displaystyle M}$, the Planck constant divided by two pi as ${\displaystyle M_{0}}$, and the quantum number or "counting of number of passes between stationary points", as stated by Bohr originally as, ${\displaystyle \tau }$. See references above for more detail.

While it would be later shown that this assumption is not entirely correct, it in fact ends up being rather close to the correct expression for the orbital angular momentum operator's (eigenvalue) quantum number for large values of the quantum number ${\displaystyle l}$, and indeed this was part of Bohr's own assumption. Regard the consequence of Bohr's assumption ${\displaystyle L^{2}=l^{2}\hbar ^{2}}$, and compare it with the correct version known today as ${\displaystyle L^{2}=l(l+1)\hbar ^{2}}$. Clearly for large ${\displaystyle l}$, there is little difference, just as well as for ${\displaystyle l=0}$, the equivalence is exact. Without going into further historical detail, it suffices to stop here and regard this era of the history of quantization to be the "old quantum theory", meaning a period in the history of physics where the corpuscular nature of subatomic particles began to play an increasingly important role in understanding the results of physical experiments, whose mandatory conclusion was the discretization of key physical observable quantities. However, unlike the era below described as the era of first quantization, this era was based solely on purely classical arguments such as Wien's displacement law, thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, and the electromagnetic theory. In fact, the observation of the Balmer series of hydrogen in the history of spectroscopy dates as far back as 1885.

Nonetheless, the watershed events, which would come to denote the era of first quantization, took place in the vital years spanning 1925–1928. Simultaneously the authors Born and Jordan in December 1925, together with Dirac also in December 1925, then Schrodinger in January 1926, following that, Born, Heisenberg and Jordan in August 1926, and finally Dirac in 1928. The results of these publications were 3 theoretical formalisms 2 of which proved to be equivalent, that of Born, Heisenberg and Jordan was equivalent to that of Schrodinger, while Dirac's 1928 theory came to be regarded as the relativistic version of the prior two. Lastly, it is worth mentioning the publication of Heisenberg and Pauli in 1929, which can be regarded as the first attempt at "second quantization", a term used verbatim by Pauli in a 1943 publication of the American Physical Society.

For purposes of clarification and understanding of the terminology as it evolved over history, it suffices to end with the major publication that helped recognize the equivalence of the matrix mechanics of Born, Heisenberg, and Jordan 1925–1926 with the wave equation of Schrodinger in 1926. The collected and expanded works of John von Neumann showed that the two theories were mathematically equivalent, and it is this realization that is today understood as first quantization.

Qualitative mathematical preliminaries

To understand the term first quantization one must first understand what it means for something to be quantum in the first place. The classical theory of Newton is a second order nonlinear differential equation that gives the deterministic trajectory of a system of mass, ${\displaystyle m}$. The acceleration, ${\displaystyle a}$, in Newton's second law of motion, ${\displaystyle F=ma}$, is the second derivative of the system's position as a function of time. Therefore, it is natural to seek solutions of the Newton equation that are at least second order differentiable.

Quantum theory differs dramatically in that it replaces physical observables such as the position of the system, the time at which that observation is made, the mass, and the velocity of the system at the instant of observation with the notion of operator observables. Operators as observables change the notion of what is measurable and brings to the table the unavoidable conclusion of the Max Born probability theory. In this framework of nondeterminism, the probability of finding the system in a particular observable state is given by a dynamic probability density that is defined as the absolute value squared of the solution to the Schrodinger equation. The fact that probability densities are integrable and normalizable to unity imply that the solutions to the Schrodinger equation must be square integrable. The vector space of infinite sequences, whose square summed up is a convergent series, is known as ${\displaystyle \ell ^{2}}$ (pronounced "little ell two"). It is in one-to-one correspondence with the infinite dimensional vector space of square-integrable functions, ${\displaystyle L^{2}(\mathbb {R} ^{d})}$, from the Euclidean space ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{d}}$ to the complex plane, ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }$. For this reason, ${\displaystyle \ell ^{2}}$ and ${\displaystyle L^{2}(\mathbb {R} ^{d})}$ are often referred to indiscriminately as "the" Hilbert space. This is rather misleading because ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{d}}$ is also a Hilbert space when equipped and completed under the Euclidean inner product, albeit a finite dimensional space.

Types of systems

Both the Newton theory and the Schrodinger theory have a mass parameter in them and they can thus describe the evolution of a collection of masses or a single constituent system with a single total mass, as well as an idealized single particle with idealized single mass system. Below are examples of different types of systems.

One-particle systems

In general, the one-particle state could be described by a complete set of quantum numbers denoted by ${\displaystyle \nu }$. For example, the three quantum numbers ${\displaystyle n,l,m}$ associated to an electron in a coulomb potential, like the hydrogen atom, form a complete set (ignoring spin). Hence, the state is called ${\displaystyle |\nu \rangle }$ and is an eigenvector of the Hamiltonian operator. One can obtain a state function representation of the state using ${\displaystyle \psi _{\nu }(\mathbf {r} )=\langle \mathbf {r} |\nu \rangle }$. All eigenvectors of a Hermitian operator form a complete basis, so one can construct any state ${\textstyle |\psi \rangle =\sum _{\nu }|\nu \rangle \langle \nu |\psi \rangle }$ obtaining the completeness relation:

${\displaystyle \sum _{\nu }|\nu \rangle \langle \nu |=\mathbf {I} }$

Many have felt that all the properties of the particle could be known using this vector basis, which is expressed here using the Dirac Bra–ket notation. However this need not be true.

Many-particle systems

When turning to N-particle systems, i.e., systems containing N identical particles i.e. particles characterized by the same physical parameters such as mass, charge and spin, an extension of the single-particle state function ${\displaystyle \psi (\mathbf {r} )}$ to the N-particle state function ${\displaystyle \psi (\mathbf {r} _{1},\mathbf {r} _{2},...,\mathbf {r} _{N})}$ is necessary. A fundamental difference between classical and quantum mechanics concerns the concept of indistinguishability of identical particles. Only two species of particles are thus possible in quantum physics, the so-called bosons and fermions which obey the rules:

${\displaystyle \psi (\mathbf {r} _{1},...,\mathbf {r} _{j},...,\mathbf {r} _{k},...,\mathbf {r_{N}} )=+\psi (\mathbf {r} _{1},...,\mathbf {r} _{k},...,\mathbf {r} _{j},...,\mathbf {r} _{N})}$ (bosons),

${\displaystyle \psi (\mathbf {r} _{1},...,\mathbf {r} _{j},...,\mathbf {r} _{k},...,\mathbf {r_{N}} )=-\psi (\mathbf {r} _{1},...,\mathbf {r} _{k},...,\mathbf {r} _{j},...,\mathbf {r} _{N})}$ (fermions).

Where we have interchanged two coordinates ${\displaystyle (\mathbf {r} _{j},\mathbf {r} _{k})}$ of the state function. The usual wave function is obtained using the Slater determinant and the identical particles theory. Using this basis, it is possible to solve any many-particle problem that can be clearly and accurately described by a single wave function single system-wide diagonalizable state. From this perspective, first quantization is not a truly multi-particle theory but the notion of "system" need not consist of a single particle either.

See also

• Canonical quantization
• Geometric quantization
• Quantization
• Second quantization

Notes

1. This statement is not unique since it can be argued that the mathematically imprecise notation of Dirac, even still today, can elucidate the equivalence.
2. Just as well, the "testing ground" of hydrogen can also be seen as strong evidence for a conclusion of equivalence.

References

1. Duck, Ian; Sudarshan, E C G (1998). Pauli and the Spin-Statistics Theorem. WORLD SCIENTIFIC. doi:10.1142/3457. ISBN 978-981-02-3114-9.
2. Dirac, P. A. M. (1950). "Generalized Hamiltonian Dynamics". Canadian Journal of Mathematics. 2: 129–148. doi:10.4153/cjm-1950-012-1. ISSN 0008-414X. S2CID 119748805.
3. Planck, Max (1901). "Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum". Annalen der Physik. 309 (3): 553–563. Bibcode:1901AnP...309..553P. doi:10.1002/andp.19013090310.
4. Einstein, A. (1905). "Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt". Annalen der Physik. 322 (6): 132–148. Bibcode:1905AnP...322..132E. doi:10.1002/andp.19053220607.
5. "All Nobel Prizes in Physics". NobelPrize.org.
6. Bohr, N. (November 1913). "LXXIII. On the constitution of atoms and molecules". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 26 (155): 857–875. Bibcode:1913PMag...26..857B. doi:10.1080/14786441308635031.
7. Bohr, N. (September 1913). "XXXVII. On the constitution of atoms and molecules". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 26 (153): 476–502. Bibcode:1913PMag...26..476B. doi:10.1080/14786441308634993.
8. Bohr, N. (July 1913). "I. On the constitution of atoms and molecules". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 26 (151): 1–25. Bibcode:1913PMag...26....1B. doi:10.1080/14786441308634955.
9. Balmer, Johann (1885). "Notiz über die Spectrallinien des Wasserstoffs". Annalen der Physik und Chemie. XXV (3rd series): 80–87. Bibcode:1885AnP...261...80B. doi:10.1002/andp.18852610506.
10. Born, M.; Jordan, P. (December 1925). "Zur Quantenmechanik". Zeitschrift für Physik. 34 (1): 858–888. Bibcode:1925ZPhy...34..858B. doi:10.1007/BF01328531. S2CID 186114542.
11. Dirac, Paul (December 1925). "The fundamental equations of quantum mechanics". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. 109 (752): 642–653. Bibcode:1925RSPSA.109..642D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1925.0150.
12. Schrödinger, E. (1926). "Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem". Annalen der Physik. 384 (4): 361–376. Bibcode:1926AnP...384..361S. doi:10.1002/andp.19263840404.
13. Born, M.; Heisenberg, W.; Jordan, P. (August 1926). "Zur Quantenmechanik. II". Zeitschrift für Physik. 35 (8–9): 557–615. Bibcode:1926ZPhy...35..557B. doi:10.1007/BF01379806. S2CID 186237037.
14. Dirac, Paul (February 1928). "The quantum theory of the electron". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. 117 (778): 610–624. Bibcode:1928RSPSA.117..610D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1928.0023.
15. Heisenberg, W.; Pauli, W. (January 1929). "Zur Quantendynamik der Wellenfelder". Zeitschrift für Physik. 56 (1–2): 1–61. Bibcode:1929ZPhy...56....1H. doi:10.1007/BF01340129. S2CID 121928597.
16. Pauli, W. (1 July 1943). "On Dirac's New Method of Field Quantization". Reviews of Modern Physics. 15 (3): 175–207. Bibcode:1943RvMP...15..175P. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.15.175.
17. Neumann, John von (2018). Wheeler, Nicholas A (ed.). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400889921. ISBN 978-1-4008-8992-1.
18. Carfì, David (2010). Foundations of superposition theory. Vol. 1, Superposition algebra in the space of tempered distributions and applications to economics and physics. Messina: Il gabbiano. ISBN 9788896293119.
19. Klauder, John (2001). "Coherent State Path Integrals Without Resolutions of Unity". Foundations of Physics. 31: 57–67. doi:10.1023/A:1004151804452. S2CID 6041817.
20. Merzbacher, E. (1970). Quantum mechanics. New York: John Wiley & sons. ISBN 0471887021.

• Quantum mechanics