Misplaced Pages

Flightless bird

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Flightless) Birds that cannot fly "Flightless" redirects here. For the record label, see Flightless (record label).
King penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus).
Penguins are a well-known example of flightless birds.
An Okarito kiwi (Apteryx rowi), also known as the rowi
Common ostrich (Struthio camelus).
Ostriches are the largest extant flightless birds as well as the largest extant birds in general.
An extinct moa. Until the arrival of humans, New Zealand's only mammals were bats and seals, resulting in many bird species evolving to fill the open niches. While many of New Zealand's flightless birds are now extinct, some, such as the kiwi, kākāpō, weka, and takahē have survived to the present day.

Flightless birds are birds that cannot fly. They have, through evolution, lost the ability to fly. There are over 60 extant species, including the well-known ratites (ostriches, emus, cassowaries, rheas, and kiwis) and penguins. The smallest flightless bird is the Inaccessible Island rail (length 12.5 cm, weight 34.7 g). The largest (both heaviest and tallest) flightless bird, which is also the largest living bird in general, is the common ostrich (2.7 m, 156 kg).

Many domesticated birds, such as the domestic chicken and domestic duck, have lost the ability to fly for extended periods, although their ancestral species, the red junglefowl and mallard, respectively, are capable of extended flight. A few particularly bred birds, such as the Broad Breasted White turkey, have become totally flightless as a result of selective breeding; the birds were bred to grow massive breast meat that weighs too much for the bird's wings to support in flight.

Flightlessness has evolved in many different birds independently, demonstrating repeated convergent evolution. There were families of flightless birds, such as the now-extinct Phorusrhacidae, that evolved to be powerful terrestrial predators. Taking this to a greater extreme, the terror birds (and their relatives the bathornithids), eogruids, geranoidids, gastornithiforms, and dromornithids (all extinct) all evolved similar body shapes – long legs, long necks and big heads – but none of them were closely related. Furthermore, they also share traits of being giant, flightless birds with vestigial wings, long legs, and long necks with some of the ratites, although they are not related.

History

Origins of flightlessness

Divergences and losses of flight within ratite lineage occurred right after the K-Pg extinction event wiped out all non-avian dinosaurs and large vertebrates 66 million years ago. The immediate evacuation of niches following the mass extinction provided opportunities for Palaeognathes to distribute and occupy novel environments. New ecological influences selectively pressured different taxa to converge on flightless modes of existence by altering them morphologically and behaviorally. The successful acquisition and protection of a claimed territory selected for large size and cursoriality in Tertiary ancestors of ratites. Temperate rainforests dried out throughout the Miocene and transformed into semiarid deserts, causing habitats to be widely spread across the growingly disparate landmasses. Cursoriality was an economic means of traveling long distances to acquire food that was usually low-lying vegetation, more easily accessed by walking. Traces of these events are reflected in ratite distribution throughout semiarid grasslands and deserts today.

Gigantism and flightlessness in birds are almost exclusively correlated due to islands lacking mammalian or reptilian predators and competition. However, ratites occupy environments that are mostly occupied by a diverse number of mammals. It is thought that they first originated through allopatric speciation caused by breakup of the supercontinent Gondwana. However, later evidence suggests this hypothesis first proposed by Joel Cracraft in 1974 is incorrect. Rather ratites arrived in their respective locations via a flighted ancestor and lost the ability to fly multiple times within the lineage.

Gigantism is not a requirement for flightlessness. The kiwi do not exhibit gigantism, along with tinamous, even though they coexisted with the moa and rheas that both exhibit gigantism. This could be the result of different ancestral flighted birds arrival or because of competitive exclusion. The first flightless bird to arrive in each environment utilized the large flightless herbivore or omnivore niche, forcing the later arrivals to remain smaller. In environments where flightless birds are not present, it is possible that after the K/T Boundary there were no niches for them to fill. They were pushed out by other herbivorous mammals.

New Zealand had more species of flightless birds (including the kiwi, several species of penguins, the takahē, the weka, the moa, and several other extinct species) than any other such location. One reason is that until the arrival of humans roughly a thousand years ago, there were no large mammalian land predators in New Zealand; the main predators of flightless birds were larger birds.

Independent evolution of flightlessness in Palaeognathes

Ratites belong to the superorder Palaeognathae, which include the volant tinamou, and are believed to have evolved flightlessness independently multiple times within their own group. Some birds evolved flightlessness in response to the absence of predators, for example on oceanic islands. Incongruences between ratite phylogeny and Gondwana geological history indicate the presence of ratites in their current locations is the result of a secondary invasion by flying birds. It remains possible that the most recent common ancestor of ratites was flightless and the tinamou regained the ability to fly. However, it is believed that the loss of flight is an easier transition for birds than the loss and regain of flight, which has never been documented in avian history. Moreover, tinamou nesting within flightless ratites indicates ancestral ratites were volant and multiple losses of flight occurred independently throughout the lineage. This indicates that the distinctive flightless nature of ratites is the result of convergent evolution.

Morphological changes and energy conservation

Two key differences between flying and flightless birds are the smaller wing bones of flightless birds and the absent (or greatly reduced) keel on their breastbone, which anchors muscles needed for wing movement.

Adapting to a cursorial lifestyle causes two inverse morphological changes to occur in the skeleto-muscular system: the pectoral apparatus used to power flight is paedorphically reduced while peramorphosis leads to enlargement of the pelvic girdle for running. Repeated selection for cursorial traits across ratites suggests these adaptions comprise a more efficient use of energy in adulthood. The name "ratite" comes from the Latin ratis, raft, a vessel with no keel. Their flat sternum is distinct from the typical sternum of flighted birds because it lacks a keel, like a raft. This structure is the place where flight muscles attach and thus allow for powered flight. However, ratite anatomy presents other primitive characters meant for flight, such as the fusion of wing elements, a cerebellar structure, the presence of a pygostyle for tail feathers, and an alula on the wing. These morphological traits suggest some affinities to volant groups. Palaeognathes were one of the first colonizers of novel niches and were free to increase in abundance until the population was limited by food and territory. A study looking at energy conservation and the evolution of flightlessness hypothesized intraspecific competition selected for a reduced individual energy expenditure, which is achieved by the loss of flight.

Some flightless varieties of island birds are closely related to flying varieties, implying flight is a significant biological cost. Flight is the most costly type of locomotion exemplified in the natural world. The energy expenditure required for flight increases proportionally with body size, which is often why flightlessness coincides with body mass. By reducing large pectoral muscles that require a significant amount of overall metabolic energy, ratites decrease their basal metabolic rate and conserve energy. A study looking at the basal rates of birds found a significant correlation between low basal rate and pectoral muscle mass in kiwis. On the contrary, flightless penguins exhibit an intermediate basal rate. This is likely because penguins have well-developed pectoral muscles for hunting and diving in the water. For ground-feeding birds, a cursorial lifestyle is more economical and allows for easier access to dietary requirements. Flying birds have different wing and feather structures that make flying easier, while flightless birds' wing structures are well adapted to their environment and activities, such as diving in the ocean.

Species with certain characteristics are more likely to evolve flightlessness. For example, species that already have shorter wings are more likely to lose flight ability. Some species will evolve flatter wings so that they move more efficiently underwater at the cost of their flight. Additionally, birds that undergo simultaneous wing molt, in which they replace all of the feathers in their wings at once during the year, are more likely to evolve flight loss.

A number of bird species appear to be in the process of losing their powers of flight to various extents. These include the Zapata rail of Cuba, the Okinawa rail of Japan, and the Laysan duck of Hawaii. All of these birds show adaptations common to flightlessness, and evolved recently from fully flighted ancestors, but have not yet completely given up the ability to fly. They are, however, weak fliers and are incapable of traveling long distances by air.

Continued presence of wings in flightless birds

Although selection pressure for flight was largely absent, the wing structure has not been lost except in the New Zealand moas. Ostriches are the fastest running birds in the world and emus have been documented running 50 km/h. At these high speeds, wings are necessary for balance and serving as a parachute apparatus to help the bird slow down. Wings are hypothesized to have played a role in sexual selection in early ancestral ratites and were thus maintained. This can be seen today in both the rheas and ostriches. These ratites utilize their wings extensively for courtship and displays to other males. Sexual selection also influences the maintenance of large body size, which discourages flight. The large size of ratites leads to greater access to mates and higher reproductive success. Ratites and tinamous are monogamous and mate only a limited number of times per year. High parental involvement denotes the necessity for choosing a reliable mate. In a climatically stable habitat providing year-round food supply, a male's claimed territory signals to females the abundance of resources readily available to her and her offspring. Male size also indicates his protective abilities. Similar to the emperor penguin, male ratites incubate and protect their offspring anywhere between 85 and 92 days while females feed. They can go up to a week without eating and survive only off fat stores. The emu has been documented fasting for as long as 56 days. If no continued pressures warrant the energy expenditure to maintain the structures of flight, selection will tend towards these other traits.

In penguins, wing structure is maintained for use in locomotion underwater. Penguins evolved their wing structure to become more efficient underwater at the cost of their efficiency in the air.

The only known species of flightless bird in which wings completely disappeared was the gigantic, herbivorous moa of New Zealand, hunted to extinction by humans by the 15th century. In moa, the entire pectoral girdle is reduced to a paired scapulocoracoid, which is the size of a finger.

List of flightless birds

Many flightless birds are extinct; this list shows species that are either still extant or became extinct in the Holocene (no more than 11,000 years ago). Extinct species are indicated with a cross (†). A number of species suspected, but not confirmed to be flightless, are also included here.

Longer-extinct groups of flightless birds include the Cretaceous patagopterygiformes, hesperornithids, the Cenozoic phorusrhacids ("terror birds") and related bathornithids, the unrelated eogruids, geranoidids, gastornithiforms, and dromornithids (mihirungs or "demon ducks"), and the plotopterids.

Palaeognathae (ratites)

Struthioniformes (ostriches)

Common ostrich
North Island brown kiwi

Casuariiformes (cassowaries and emus)

Dinornithiformes (moa) †

Aepyornithiformes (elephant birds) †

Apterygiformes (kiwi)

Rheiformes (rheas)

Neognathae

Galliformes (landfowl)

Anseriformes (waterfowl)

Campbell teal

Aegotheliformes (owlet-nightjars)

Mesitornithiformes (mesites)

  • Brown mesite Mesitornis unicolor (possibly flightless, has not been seen flying)

Columbiformes (pigeons, doves)

Dodo

Gruiformes (cranes, rails, and coots)

Weka
Takahē stride

Podicipediformes (grebes)

Great auk †

Charadriiformes (shorebirds and allies)

Sphenisciformes (penguins)

Emperor penguin

Suliformes (boobies, cormorants and allies)

Flightless cormorant

Pelecaniformes (pelicans, herons, ibises and allies)

Strigiformes (owls)

Bucerotiformes (hornbills and hoopoes)

Falconiformes (falcons and caracaras)

Psittaciformes (parrots)

Kākāpō

Passeriformes (perching birds)

References

  1. "New Zealand Ecology – Moa". TerraNature. Retrieved 2007-08-27.
  2. Roots C. (2006). Flightless Birds. Westport: Greenwood Press. pp. XIV. ISBN 978-0-313-33545-7.
  3. Sayol, F.; Steinbauer, M. J.; Blackburn, T. M.; Antonelli, A.; Faurby, S. (2020). "Anthropogenic extinctions conceal widespread evolution of flightlessness in birds". Science Advances. 6 (49). Bibcode:2020SciA....6.6095S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb6095. PMC 7710364. PMID 33268368. S2CID 227261010.
  4. ^ Harshman, J.; Braun, E. L.; Braun, M. J.; Huddleston, C. J.; Bowie, R. C.; Chojnowski, J. L.; Hackett, S. J.; Han, K. L.; Kimball, R. T.; Marks, B. D.; Miglia, K. J.; Moore, W. S.; Reddy, S.; Sheldon, F. H.; Steadman, D. W.; Steppan, S. J.; Witt, C. C.; Yuri, T. (2 September 2008). "Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (36): 13462–13467. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10513462H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803242105. PMC 2533212. PMID 18765814.
  5. Holmes, Bob (2008-06-26). "Bird evolutionary tree given a shake by DNA study". New Scientist.
  6. ^ Smith, J. V.; Braun, E. L.; Kimball, R. T. (2013). "Ratite nonmonophyly: Independent evidence from 40 novel Loci". Systematic Biology. 62 (1): 35–49. doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys067. PMID 22831877.
  7. ^ Phillips, M. J.; Gibb, G. C.; Crimp, E. A.; Penny, D. (2010). "Tinamous and moa flock together: Mitochondrial genome sequence analysis reveals independent losses of flight among ratites". Systematic Biology. 59 (1): 90–107. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp079. PMID 20525622.
  8. ^ Noble, J. C. (1991). "On ratites and their interactions with plants" (PDF). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural. 64: 85–118.
  9. Palombo, Maria Rita; Moncunill-Solé, Blanca (2023). "Dwarfing and gigantism in quaternary vertebrates". Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-99931-1.00012-X. ISBN 978-0-12-409548-9.
  10. ^ Mitchell, K. J.; Llamas, B.; Soubrier, J.; Rawlence, N. J.; Worthy, T. H.; Wood, J.; Lee, M. S.; Cooper, A. (2014). "Ancient DNA reveals elephant birds and kiwi are sister taxa and clarifies ratite bird evolution". Science. 344 (6186): 898–900. Bibcode:2014Sci...344..898M. doi:10.1126/science.1251981. hdl:2328/35953. PMID 24855267. S2CID 206555952.
  11. ^ Baker, A. J.; Haddrath, O.; McPherson, J. D.; Cloutier, A. (2014). "Genomic support for a moa-tinamou clade and adaptive morphological convergence in flightless ratites". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 31 (7): 1686–96. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu153. PMID 24825849.
  12. ^ Cracraft, Joel (2008). "Phylogeny and Evolution of the Ratite Birds". Ibis. 116 (4): 494–521. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1974.tb07648.x.
  13. "New Zealand's Icon:Flightless". Archived from the original on 2007-08-18. Retrieved 2007-08-27.
  14. Haddrath, O.; Baker, A. J. (2012). "Multiple nuclear genes and retroposons support vicariance and dispersal of the palaeognaths, and an Early Cretaceous origin of modern birds". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 279 (1747): 4617–25. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1630. PMC 3479725. PMID 22977150.
  15. Harshman, J.; Braun, E. L.; Braun, M. J.; Huddleston, C. J.; Bowie, R. C.; Chojnowski, J. L.; Hackett, S. J.; Han, K. L.; Kimball, R. T.; Marks, B. D.; Miglia, K. J.; Moore, W. S.; Reddy, S.; Sheldon, F. H.; Steadman, D. W.; Steppan, S. J.; Witt, C. C.; Yuri, T. (2008). "Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (36): 13462–7. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10513462H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803242105. PMC 2533212. PMID 18765814.
  16. ^ Smith, J. V.; Braun, E. L.; Kimball, R. T. (2013). "Ratite nonmonophyly: Independent evidence from 40 novel Loci". Systematic Biology. 62 (1): 35–49. doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys067. PMID 22831877.
  17. Nudds, R. L.; Davidson, J. Slove (2010). "A shortening of the manus precedes the attenuation of other wing-bone elements in the evolution of flightlessness in birds". Acta Zoologica. 91: 115–122. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6395.2009.00391.x.
  18. "The Bird Site: Flightless Birds". Archived from the original on 2007-07-13. Retrieved 2007-08-27.
  19. ^ McNab, Brian K. (1994). "Energy Conservation and the Evolution of Flightlessness in Birds". The American Naturalist. 144 (4): 628–642. doi:10.1086/285697. JSTOR 2462941. S2CID 86511951.
  20. ^ Cubo, Jorge; Arthur, Wallace (2000). "Patterns of correlated character evolution in flightless birds: A phylogenetic approach". Evolutionary Ecology. 14 (8): 693–702. Bibcode:2000EvEco..14..693C. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.115.1294. doi:10.1023/A:1011695406277. S2CID 951896.
  21. Elliott, Kyle H.; Ricklefs, Robert E.; Gaston, Anthony J.; Hatch, Scott A.; Speakman, John R.; Davoren, Gail K. (2013). "High flight costs, but low dive costs, in auks support the biomechanical hypothesis for flightlessness in penguins". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (23): 9380–9384. Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.9380E. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304838110. PMC 3677478. PMID 23690614.
  22. McCall, Robert A.; Nee, Sean; Harvey, Paul H. (July 1998). "The role of wing length in the evolution of avian flightlessness". Evolutionary Ecology. 12 (5): 569–580. Bibcode:1998EvEco..12..569M. doi:10.1023/A:1006508826501. S2CID 37855732.
  23. Haidr, Nadia Soledad (June 2023). "Ecomorphological variation of the penguin wing". Journal of Morphology. 284 (6): e21588. doi:10.1002/jmor.21588. ISSN 0362-2525. PMID 37183492.
  24. Terrill, Ryan S. (2020-12-01). "Simultaneous Wing Molt as a Catalyst for the Evolution of Flightlessness in Birds". The American Naturalist. 196 (6): 775–784. doi:10.1086/711416. PMID 33211563. S2CID 225249314.
  25. Roots, Clive (2006). Flightless Birds. Westport, CT: Greenwood. pp. 136–37. ISBN 9780313335457.
  26. Handford, Paul; Mares, Michael A. (1985). "The mating systems of ratites and tinamous: An evolutionary perspective". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 25: 77–104. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb00387.x.
  27. Ksepka, Daniel T.; Ando, Tatsuro (2011). "Penguins Past, Present, and Future: Trends in the Evolution of the Sphenisciformes". Living Dinosaurs. pp. 155–186. doi:10.1002/9781119990475.ch6. ISBN 978-0-470-65666-2.
  28. Elliott, Kyle H.; Ricklefs, Robert E.; Gaston, Anthony J.; Hatch, Scott A.; Speakman, John R.; Davoren, Gail K. (4 June 2013). "High flight costs, but low dive costs, in auks support the biomechanical hypothesis for flightlessness in penguins". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (23): 9380–9384. Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.9380E. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304838110. PMC 3677478. PMID 23690614.
  29. Huynen, Leon; Suzuki, Takayuki; Ogura, Toshihiko; Watanabe, Yusuke; Millar, Craig D; Hofreiter, Michael; Smith, Craig; Mirmoeini, Sara; Lambert, David M (December 2014). "Reconstruction and in vivo analysis of the extinct tbx5 gene from ancient wingless moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes)". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 14 (1): 75. Bibcode:2014BMCEE..14...75H. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-14-75. PMC 4101845. PMID 24885927.
  30. Roots, Clive. Flightless Birds. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2006. 136–37. Print.
  31. Diamond, Jared (July 1991). "A New Species of Rail from the Solomon Islands and Convergent Evolution of Insular Flightlessness". The Auk. 108 (3): 461–470. doi:10.2307/4088088. JSTOR 4088088.
  32. Hunter, Laurie A. (November 1988). "Status of the Endemic Atitlan Grebe of Guatemala: Is It Extinct?". The Condor. 90 (4): 906–912. doi:10.2307/1368847. JSTOR 1368847.

External links

Category: