 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
| Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act, 2003 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Gujarat Legislature | |
Long title
| |
| Citation | Gujarat Act No. 22 of 2003. |
| Territorial extent | Gujarat |
| Enacted by | Government of Gujarat |
| Enacted | 2003 |
| Assented to | 7 April 2003 |
| Signed | Governor of Gujarat |
| Commenced | 8 April 2003 |
| Related legislation | |
| Orissa Freedom of Religion Act, 1967 Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act, 1978 Himachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act 2006 Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act, 2018 Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Bill, 2020 Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020 | |
| Keywords | |
| Unlawful Conversion, Unlawful inter-faith marriages, Allurement, Convincing for Conversion, Force, Fraudulent, Coercion, Undue Influence, Minor, Religion, Mass Conversion, Religion Convertor | |
| Status: In force | |
The Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act (2003) requires religious conversions in Gujarat, India, to be approved by a district magistrate.
Key points
The act in itself is alleged to go against the article 25 of the constitution of India (i.e. Right to freedom of religion) in addition to the constitutional right to freedom of speech and expression and to gather peacefully. The parts of it described are as below:
"(1) Whoever converts any person from one religion to another either by performing any ceremony by himself for such conversion as a religious priest or takes part directly or indirectly in such ceremony shall take prior permission for such proposed conversion from the District Magistrate concerned by applying in such form as may be prescribed by rules. (2) The person who is converted shall send an intimation to the District Magistrate of the District concerned in which the ceremony has taken place of the fact of such conversion within such period and in such form as may be prescribed by rules. (3) Whoever fails, without sufficient cause, to comply with the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2) shall be punished with imprisonment for a term, which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to rupees one thousand or with both."
The above clauses prevent common people from gathering peacefully at any private function, and also attending the function requires a prior permission from the Magistrate.
From 2011 to 2016, 94.4% of the applications for religious conversion in Gujarat were from Hinduism to another religion, and approximately half of the applications were declined by the state.
Supreme Court of India's opinion
In 2005, the Supreme Court of India declined to issue a writ of mandamus to grant Jains the status of a religious minority throughout India, and left it to the individual states to decide on the minority status of the Jain religion.
However, the Supreme Court had recently observed that "The Jain Religion is indisputably not a part of Hindu Religion".
Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill 2006
In order to regulate religious conversions, the Gujarat government is proposing an amendment that will group Jainism and Buddhism along with Hinduism, and thus the adoption of any faith within the group will not be considered a conversion. The bill was passed by voice vote in the Gujarat assembly on 29 September 2006.
All India Digambar Jain Mahasabha opposed the decision on 20 September 2006. Their leader stated, "Any government, as per their convenience and agenda cannot afford to curb our right of a religious identity".
Bhartiya Dharma Rakshak Sena (BDRS), a small organisation said to be run by Jains, maintains that all religions in India are a part of Hinduism, "which is not a religion but a culture." In a press release, on 22 September 2006, Jasmin Shah, Piyush Jain and Abhay Shah of BDRS stated that the controversy is being promoted by forces who want to weaken Hinduism by creating minorities. They state that "Jainism is independent of Vedic religion, known as 'Hinduism'". The BDRS members claimed that there four sub-sects in Jainism, out of which one, the Digambara sect, is demanding a minority status.
On 3 October 2006 the predominant Jain sect in Gujarat, the Shwetambar Murtipujak Jain Sangh, held a meeting with state's solicitor-general to assert that Jainism is a distinct religion and not a Hindu denomination. Shrenik Shah, Gujarat's leading industrialist and president of the All India Shwetambar Murtipujak Jain Sangh, said that they had held a meeting with Gujarat's solicitor-general and expressed their view to recognise Jainism as a distinct religion. "We are not primarily concerned with the conversion aspect of the bill. But we have asserted our view that Jainism is a distinct religion," said Shah
The bill was withdrawn in March 2008.
Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2021
The Gujarat Legislative Assembly amended the Freedom of Religion Act to penalizes forcible or fraudulent religious conversion by marriage.
The law made provisions for 3–10 years in jail and a fine of up to ₹500,000 if the accused is found guilty. The amendments a 2003 was sought to curb the emerging trend in which women were being lured to marriage for the purpose of religious conversion.
The bill was passed by the assembly on 14 June 2021
References
- Shimron, Yonat (11 May 2017). "A Dalit community looks to escape the caste system by converting to Buddhism". Religion News Service. Retrieved 17 November 2020.
- "Petition challenges Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act". Business Standard India. Press Trust of India. 21 January 2015. Retrieved 13 July 2020.
- "In Gujarat, 94.4% of those seeking to convert are Hindu". The Times of India. 16 March 2016. Retrieved 17 November 2020.
- Appeal (civil) 4730 of 1999, Decided on 8 August 2005 Bal Patil & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.Bal Patil & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. Indian Supreme Court Case Archived 2 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine
- Judgment, Supreme Court of India, Per Dalveer Bhandari J., Civil Appeal No. 9595 of 2003, para 25, decided On: 21.08.2006 Committee of Management Kanya Junior High School Bal Vidya Mandir, Etah, U.P. v. Sachiv, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad, U.P. and Ors.Committee of Management Kanya Junior High Bal Vindya Mandir, Etah, U.P. v. Sachiv, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad, U.P. and Ors. Indian Supreme Court Case Archived 11 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine
- "Wired". Outlookindia.com. Archived from the original on 2 May 2008. Retrieved 20 February 2012.
- "Minorities protest against Gujarat's conversion law". The Times Of India. 21 September 2006.
- "Religion Bill stirs up an unholy mess". Archived from the original on 2 May 2008. Retrieved 3 October 2006.
- "Gujarat withdraws Freedom of Religion Amendment Bill - Indian Express". The Indian Express. 11 March 2008. Retrieved 17 November 2020.
- Ghanghar, Gopi Maniar. "Love Jihad: After MP and UP, Gujarat to bring anti-conversion law with 5-year-jail term". India Today. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
- Langa, Mahesh. "Gujarat Assembly passes 'love jihad' law". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 14 June 2021.