Misplaced Pages

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Gelfond's constant" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In mathematics, the exponential of pi e, also called Gelfond's constant, is the real number e raised to the power π.

Its decimal expansion is given by:

e = 23.14069263277926900572... (sequence A039661 in the OEIS)

Like both e and π, this constant is both irrational and transcendental. This follows from the Gelfond–Schneider theorem, which establishes a to be transcendental, given that a is algebraic and not equal to zero or one and b is algebraic but not rational. We have$${\displaystyle e^{\pi }=(e^{i\pi })^{-i}=(-1)^{-i},}$$where i is the imaginary unit. Since −i is algebraic but not rational, e is transcendental. The numbers π and e are also known to be algebraically independent over the rational numbers, as demonstrated by Yuri Nesterenko. It is not known whether e is a Liouville number. The constant was mentioned in Hilbert's seventh problem alongside the Gelfond-Schneider constant 2 and the name "Gelfond's constant" stems from soviet mathematician Aleksander Gelfond.

Occurrences

The constant e appears in relation to the volumes of hyperspheres:

The volume of an n-sphere with radius R is given by:$${\displaystyle V_{n}(R)={\frac {\pi ^{\frac {n}{2}}R^{n}}{\Gamma \left({\frac {n}{2}}+1\right)}},}$$where Γ is the gamma function. Considering only unit spheres (R = 1) yields:$${\displaystyle V_{n}(1)={\frac {\pi ^{\frac {n}{2}}}{\Gamma \left({\frac {n}{2}}+1\right)}},}$$ Any even-dimensional 2n-sphere now gives:$${\displaystyle V_{2n}(1)={\frac {\pi ^{n}}{\Gamma (n+1)}}={\frac {\pi ^{n}}{n!}}}$$summing up all even-dimensional unit sphere volumes and utilizing the series expansion of the exponential function gives:$${\displaystyle \sum _{n=0}^{\infty }V_{2n}(1)=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {\pi ^{n}}{n!}}=\exp(\pi )=e^{\pi }.}$$We also have:

If one defines k₀ = ⁠1/√2⁠ and$${\displaystyle k_{n+1}={\frac {1-{\sqrt {1-k_{n}^{2}}}}{1+{\sqrt {1-k_{n}^{2}}}}}}$$for n > 0, then the sequence$${\displaystyle (4/k_{n+1})^{2^{-n}}}$$converges rapidly to e.

Similar or related constants

Ramanujan's constant

The number e is known as Ramanujan's constant. Its decimal expansion is given by:

e = 262537412640768743.99999999999925007259... (sequence A060295 in the OEIS)

which suprisingly turns out to be very close to the integer 640320 + 744: This is an application of Heegner numbers, where 163 is the Heegner number in question. This number was discovered in 1859 by the mathematician Charles Hermite. In a 1975 April Fool article in Scientific American magazine, "Mathematical Games" columnist Martin Gardner made the hoax claim that the number was in fact an integer, and that the Indian mathematical genius Srinivasa Ramanujan had predicted it—hence its name. Ramanujan's constant is also a transcendental number.

The coincidental closeness, to within one trillionth of the number 640320 + 744 is explained by complex multiplication and the q-expansion of the j-invariant, specifically:$${\displaystyle j((1+{\sqrt {-163}})/2)=(-640\,320)^{3}}$$and,$${\displaystyle (-640\,320)^{3}=-e^{\pi {\sqrt {163}}}+744+O\left(e^{-\pi {\sqrt {163}}}\right)}$$where O(e) is the error term,$${\displaystyle {\displaystyle O\left(e^{-\pi {\sqrt {163}}}\right)=-196\,884/e^{\pi {\sqrt {163}}}\approx -196\,884/(640\,320^{3}+744)\approx -0.000\,000\,000\,000\,75}}$$which explains why e is 0.000 000 000 000 75 below 640320 + 744.

(For more detail on this proof, consult the article on Heegner numbers.)

The number e − π

The number e − π is also very close to an integer, its decimal expansion being given by:

e − π = 19.99909997918947576726... (sequence A018938 in the OEIS)

The explanation for this seemingly remarkable coincidence was given by A. Doman in September 2023, and is a result of a sum related to Jacobi theta functions as follows: $${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{\infty }\left(8\pi k^{2}-2\right)e^{-\pi k^{2}}=1.}$$ The first term dominates since the sum of the terms for ${\displaystyle k\geq 2}$ total ${\displaystyle \sim 0.0003436.}$ The sum can therefore be truncated to ${\displaystyle \left(8\pi -2\right)e^{-\pi }\approx 1,}$ where solving for ${\displaystyle e^{\pi }}$ gives ${\displaystyle e^{\pi }\approx 8\pi -2.}$ Rewriting the approximation for ${\displaystyle e^{\pi }}$ and using the approximation for ${\displaystyle 7\pi \approx 22}$ gives $${\displaystyle e^{\pi }\approx \pi +7\pi -2\approx \pi +22-2=\pi +20.}$$Thus, rearranging terms gives ${\displaystyle e^{\pi }-\pi \approx 20.}$ Ironically, the crude approximation for ${\displaystyle 7\pi }$ yields an additional order of magnitude of precision.

The number π

The decimal expansion of π is given by:

${\displaystyle \pi ^{e}=}$ 22.45915771836104547342... (sequence A059850 in the OEIS)

It is not known whether or not this number is transcendental. Note that, by Gelfond-Schneider theorem, we can only infer definitively whether or not a is transcendental if a and b are algebraic (a and b are both considered complex numbers).

In the case of e, we are only able to prove this number transcendental due to properties of complex exponential forms and the above equivalency given to transform it into (-1), allowing the application of Gelfond-Schneider theorem.

π has no such equivalence, and hence, as both π and e are transcendental, we can not use the Gelfond-Schneider theorem to draw conclusions about the transcendence of π. However the currently unproven Schanuel's conjecture would imply its transcendence.

The number i

Using the principal value of the complex logarithm$${\displaystyle i^{i}=(e^{i\pi /2})^{i}=e^{-\pi /2}=(e^{\pi })^{-1/2}}$$The decimal expansion of is given by:

${\displaystyle i^{i}=}$ 0.20787957635076190854... (sequence A049006 in the OEIS)

Its transcendence follows directly from the transcendence of e.

See also

• Transcendental number
• Transcendental number theory, the study of questions related to transcendental numbers
• Euler's identity
• Gelfond–Schneider constant

References

1. "A039661 - OEIS". oeis.org. Retrieved 2024-10-27.
2. Weisstein, Eric W. "Gelfond's Constant". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2024-10-27.
3. Nesterenko, Y (1996). "Modular Functions and Transcendence Problems". Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I. 322 (10): 909–914. Zbl 0859.11047.
4. Waldschmidt, Michel (2004-01-24). "Open Diophantine Problems". arXiv:math/0312440.
5. Tijdeman, Robert (1976). "On the Gel'fond–Baker method and its applications". In Felix E. Browder (ed.). Mathematical Developments Arising from Hilbert Problems. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics. Vol. XXVIII.1. American Mathematical Society. pp. 241–268. ISBN 0-8218-1428-1. Zbl 0341.10026.
6. "Sums of volumes of unit spheres". www.johndcook.com. 2019-05-26. Retrieved 2024-10-27.
7. Borwein, J.; Bailey, D. (2004). Mathematics by Experiment: Plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century. Wellesley, MA: A K Peters. p. 137. ISBN 1-56881-211-6. Zbl 1083.00001.
8. Barrow, John D (2002). The Constants of Nature. London: Jonathan Cape. p. 72. ISBN 0-224-06135-6.
9. Gardner, Martin (April 1975). "Mathematical Games". Scientific American. 232 (4). Scientific American, Inc: 127. Bibcode:1975SciAm.232e.102G. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0575-102.
10. Eric Weisstein, "Almost Integer" at MathWorld
11. Waldschmidt, Michel (2021). "Schanuel's Conjecture: algebraic independence of transcendental numbers" (PDF).

Further reading

• Alan Baker and Gisbert Wüstholz, Logarithmic Forms and Diophantine Geometry, New Mathematical Monographs 9, Cambridge University Press, 2007, ISBN 978-0-521-88268-2

External links

• Gelfond's constant at MathWorld
• A new complex power tower identity for Gelfond's constant
• Almost Integer at MathWorld

• Mathematical constants
• Real transcendental numbers