Misplaced Pages

This article cites its sources but its page reference ranges are too broad or incorrect. Please help in adding a more precise page range. (April 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This is a glossary of mereology. Mereology is the philosophical study of part-whole relationships, also called parthood relationships.

• A
• B
• C
• D
• E
• F
• G
• H
• I
• J
• K
• L
• M
• N
• O
• P
• Q
• R
• S
• T
• U
• V
• W
• X
• Y
• Z
• See also
• References

A

anti-symmetry of parthood

In mereology, a principle stating that if A is part of B and B is part of A, then A and B are identical, reinforcing the notion of precise part-whole relationships.

atomic mereology

A branch of mereology that deals with wholes that are ultimately composed of indivisible parts, or atoms, focusing on how such atomic parts combine to form larger wholes.

atomless gunk

See gunk.

B

C

calculus of individuals

Because mereology applies to individuals, it is called the calculus of individuals, in contrast to set theory, which is called the calculus of classes.

classical mereology

Classical mereology is the mereological theory obtained by assuming that the parthood relation is a partial ordering, and that the unrestricted fusion principle holds.

composition

The relation that connects many things to a single thing that includes whatever is in the many things, and nothing extraneous to them.

compositional universalism

A position in mereology that holds any collection of entities, regardless of how disparate, can constitute a whole, leading to the possibility of any entities forming a composite object. Also called "mereological universalism".

D

E

extensional mereology

A branch of mereology that focuses on the relations of parts to wholes based on the extensions of the parts, without regard to the nature or properties of the parts.

extensionality

The principle in mereology stating that two objects are identical if they have the same proper parts.

F

fusion

Synonym for "mereological sum".

G

general extensional mereology

General extensional mereology is the mereological theory obtained by assuming that the parthood relation is a partial ordering and that the strong supplementation principle, and the unrestricted fusion principle, hold.

ground mereology

Ground mereology is the mereological theory obtained by assuming that the parthood relation is a partial ordering.

gunk

An object or substance whose parts all have proper parts, which means the object is divisible into parts indefinitely, with no simplest parts or atoms. (Short for "atomless gunk".)

gunky

Adjective describing entities, or worlds, made out of atomless gunk – that is, objects all of whose parts have proper parts.

H

harmony

The principle that an object x is part of an object y if, and only if, the region in space occupied by x is part of the region in space occupied by y.

hunky

Adjective describing a possible world that is both gunky and junky.

I

identity of indiscernibles

A principle often discussed in the context of mereology, stating that no two distinct objects have exactly the same properties, thus differentiating even similar wholes by their specific parts.

J

junk

A state of affairs where all objects are proper parts of something else, which means objects are composable into further objects indefinitely, never forming a complete "world". (Short for "worldless junk"; coined as the converse of "atomless gunk".)

junky

Adjective describing a possible world with junk in it, i.e., a world where every object is a proper part of something else.

K

knug

Term coined by John Parsons for what is more commonly called "junk"; coined to be "gunk" written backwards.

knunk

A proposed term for structures that are junky and all their members are gunky; coinage by Giberman, inspired by Parsons's "knug", to reflect what must have been meant by the coiners of "hunky", since, if worlds are taken to be concrete objects, no gunky-and-junky worlds are possible.

L

M

mereological continuity

The principle in mereology that suggests wholes are continuously divisible into smaller and smaller parts, with no abrupt discontinuities in the structure of the objects.

mereological essentialism

The view in mereology that parts are essential to the wholes they constitute; that is, a whole cannot exist without having precisely those parts.

mereological extensionality

The principle in mereology stating that two objects are identical if they have the same proper parts.

mereological fusion

Synonym for "mereological sum".

mereological harmony

See harmony.

mereological monism

The view that, in a large and significant domain of things, classical extensional mereology is the only correct theory of parthood and composition. Not to be confused with monism.

mereological nihilism

The philosophical position that denies the existence of composite objects, asserting that only basic, partless entities exist.

mereological sum

An object that is composed of all and only the entities in a given collection, according to the principles of mereology.

mereological universalism

The view that two objects always compose a third, which is to say, that mereological composition is unrestricted. Also called "compositional universalism".

mereology

The study of the relationships between parts and wholes, and the principles governing the composition of objects.

minimal mereology

Minimal mereology is the mereological theory obtained by assuming that the parthood relation is a partial ordering, and that the weak supplementation principle holds.

monism

The view that there is only one fundamental object, which is the cosmos, and that all other objects (its parts) derive their reality from it. Formally, ${\displaystyle (\exists !x)Bx~\&~Bu}$, where ${\displaystyle u}$ represents the cosmos, and ${\displaystyle B}$ represents the status of being a basic actual concrete object, i.e., an object that is concrete and does not depend on anything concrete. Not to be confused with senses of "monism" outside of mereology, or with mereological monism.

N

non-well-founded mereology

An approach to mereology where parts and wholes can form circular or self-referential structures, challenging traditional, well-founded notions of parthood.

O

overlap

In mereology, the relation between objects or sets that share at least one part in common.

P

parthood

The relation between an entity and a composite object of which it is a part, central to mereology, the study of parts and wholes.

proper parthood

A relation between two entities where one is a part of the other but not equivalent to it, indicating a strict subset relationship in the context of mereology.

pluralism

The view there are more than one fundamental object; opposed to monism. Not to be confused with senses of "pluralism" outside of mereology.

priority pluralism

Another term for pluralism, emphasizing that pluralities are metaphysically prior to wholes, although wholes exist.

Q

R

reflexivity of parthood

The property according to which everything is part of itself.

S

simple

In mereology, a simple is an object that has no parts other than itself, often considered in discussions of mereological nihilism and the debate over the existence of composite objects.

strong supplementation principle

A principle in mereology stating that if an object is not part of another, then there must be a part of the latter that does not overlap with the object, emphasizing the distinctness and separability of parts within wholes.

T

transitivity of parthood

The property where if A is part of B, and B is part of C, then A is part of C, emphasizing the chain-like nature of part-whole relationships.

U

underlap

A concept in mereology where two objects do not share any parts in common, opposite of overlap, emphasizing the disjointness of the objects.

unrestricted fusion

A principle in mereology allowing for the existence of a composite object consisting of any collection of parts, regardless of how dispersed or unrelated those parts may be.

V

W

worldless junk

See junk.

X

Y

Z

See also

• Glossary of set theory
• Mereology

References

1. ^ Champollion, Lucas; Krifka, Manfred (2016), Aloni, Maria; Dekker, Paul (eds.), "Mereology", The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 369–388, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139236157.014, ISBN 978-1-139-23615-7, retrieved 2024-04-21
2. ^ Lando, Giorgio (2017). Mereology: a philosophical introduction. London Oxford New York: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1-4725-8367-3.
3. Koslicki, Kathrin (2008). The structure of objects. Oxford: Oxford University press. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-19-953989-5.
4. Bunnin, Nicholas; Yu, Jiyuan (2004). The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. p. 424. ISBN 978-1-4051-0679-5.
5. ^ Cook, Roy T. (2009-03-20). A Dictionary of Philosophical Logic. doi:10.1515/9780748631971. ISBN 978-0-7486-3197-1.
6. ^ McDaniel, Kris (2020). This is metaphysics: an introduction. This is philosophy. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 103. ISBN 978-1-118-40078-4.
7. ^ Contessa, Gabriele (2012). "The junk argument: safe disposal guidelines for mereological universalists". Analysis. 72 (3): 455–457. doi:10.1093/analys/ans071. ISSN 0003-2638. JSTOR 23250552.
8. ^ Cotnoir, A. J.; Varzi, Achille C. (2021). "What is Mereology?". Mereology. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780191811647.
9. ^ Varzi, Achille (2019), "Mereology", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2024-04-21
10. ^ Giberman, Daniel; Philosophy Documentation Center (2020). "What it takes to be hunky". Thought: A Journal of Philosophy. 9 (1): 51–57. doi:10.1002/tht3.442. ISSN 2161-2234.
11. ^ Bennett, Karen; Zimmerman, Dean W. (2011-02-10). Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: volume 6. Oxford University Press. pp. 199–224. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603039.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-172541-8.
12. ^ Bohn, Einar Duenger (April 2009). "Must There be a Top Level?". The Philosophical Quarterly. 59 (235): 193–201. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.573.x.
13. ^ Schaffer, Jonathan (2010-01-01). "Monism: The Priority of the Whole". The Philosophical Review. 119 (1): 31–76. doi:10.1215/00318108-2009-025. ISSN 0031-8108.
14. Parsons, Josh (2007-05-31), "Theories of Location", Oxford Studies In Metaphysics, Oxford University PressOxford, pp. 201–232, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199218394.003.0007, ISBN 978-0-19-921839-4, retrieved 2024-04-22
15. Gruszczyński, R. (2013). "Mereological Fusion as an Upper Bound". Bulletin of the Section of Logic. 42: 135–150.
16. Fine, Kit (1994). "Compounds and Aggregates". Noûs. 28 (2): 137–158. doi:10.2307/2216046. ISSN 0029-4624. JSTOR 2216046.
17. Ney, Alyssa (2023). Metaphysics: an introduction (2nd ed.). London; New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-1-351-14120-8.
18. ^ Bohn, Einar Duenger (2012-03-01). "Monism, Emergence, and Plural Logic". Erkenntnis. 76 (2): 211–223. doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9280-4. ISSN 1572-8420.
19. COTNOIR, AARON J.; BACON, ANDREW (2011-12-09). "Non-Wellfounded Mereology". The Review of Symbolic Logic. 5 (2): 187–204. doi:10.1017/s1755020311000293. hdl:10023/3157. ISSN 1755-0203.
20. Canavotto, Ilaria; Giordani, Alessandro (2022-10-01). "An Extensional Mereology for Structured Entities". Erkenntnis. 87 (5): 2343–2373. doi:10.1007/s10670-020-00305-5. ISSN 1572-8420.
21. Johansson, Ingvar (2013-05-02), "On the Transitivity of the Parthood Relations", Relations and Predicates, De Gruyter, pp. 161–182, doi:10.1515/9783110326857.161, ISBN 978-3-11-032685-7, retrieved 2024-04-21
22. Kleinschmidt, Shieva, ed. (2014-01-09). "Mereology and Modality". Mereology and Location. Oxford University Press. pp. 33–56. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593828.003.0003. ISBN 978-0-19-959382-8.

• Philosophy-related glossaries