Misplaced Pages

Heuristic argument

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Heuristic argument" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

A heuristic argument is an argument that reasons from the value of a method or principle that has been shown experimentally (especially through trial-and-error) to be useful or convincing in learning, discovery and problem-solving, but whose line of reasoning involves key oversimplifications that make it not entirely rigorous. A widely used and important example of a heuristic argument is Occam's Razor.

It is a speculative, non-rigorous argument that relies on analogy or intuition, and that allows one to achieve a result or an approximation that is to be checked later with more rigor. Otherwise, the results are generally to be doubted. It is used as a hypothesis or a conjecture in an investigation, though it can also be used as a mnemonic as well.

See also

References

  1. "Heuristic argument". The Prime Glossary. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  2. Brodsky, Stanley J.; Ellis, John; Karliner, Marek (1988). "Chiral symmetry and the spin of the proton" (PDF). Physics Letters B. 206 (2): 309–315. Bibcode:1988PhLB..206..309B. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91511-0. OSTI 1448514. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-10.
Stub icon

This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: