Misplaced Pages

Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (HPC)
A 3D model of the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station
Country	England, United Kingdom
Location	Hinkley Point, Somerset, South West England
Coordinates	51°12′21″N 3°08′34″W / 51.2059°N 3.1429°W / 51.2059; -3.1429
Status	Under construction
Construction began	March 2017
Commission date	Estimated 2029–2031 (2029–2031)
Construction cost	£31–35 billion in 2015 prices; £41.6–47.9 billion in 2024 prices
Owner	EDF Energy (70.5%) China General Nuclear Power Group (29.5%)
Operator	NNB Generation Company
Employees	6,300 on-site construction workers
Nuclear power station
Reactor type	PWR - EPR
Reactor supplier	Framatome
Cooling source	Sea water from Severn Estuary
Thermal capacity	2 × 4,524 MWt (planned)
Power generation
Make and model	EPR-1750
Units planned	2 × 1,630 MWe
Nameplate capacity	3,260 MWe (planned)
External links
Website	https://www.edfenergy.com/energy/nuclear-new-build-projects/hinkley-point-c
Commons	Related media on Commons
[edit on Wikidata]

Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (HPC) is a two-unit, 3,200 MWe EPR nuclear power station under construction in Somerset, England.

The site was one of eight announced by the British government in 2010, and in November 2012 a nuclear site licence was granted.

On 28 July 2016, the EDF board approved the project, and on 15 September 2016 the UK government approved the project with some safeguards for the investment. The project is financed by EDF Energy and China General Nuclear Power Group (CGN). The final cost was to be £18 billion in 2015 prices.

When construction began in March 2017 completion was expected in 2025. Since then the project has been subject to several delays, including some caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and Brexit, and this has resulted in significant budget overruns. As of May 2022, the project was two years late and the expected cost stood at £25–26 billion (2015 prices, excluding interim interest), 50% more than the original budget from 2016. In EDF's 2022 annual results published on 17 February 2023, the cost was £31–32 billion in 2023 prices, Unit 1 had a start date of June 2027 and a risk of 15 months further delay. In January 2024, EDF announced that it estimated that the final cost would be £31–35 billion (2015 prices, excluding interim interest), £41.6–47.9 billion in 2024 prices, with Unit 1 becoming operational in 2029-2031.

History

1980s & 90s

In 1981, the UK government announced plans to expand its nuclear power stations and the group Alliance against Hinkley C was founded to oppose construction of another plant at Hinkley Point. The following August it was confirmed that the intent was to build Hinkley C. The Alliance against Hinkley C began publishing a newsletter pressing for the government to focus instead on the development of renewable energy systems and alerting the public to the harm to the environment.

In 1986, the Alliance against Hinkley C was renamed to the Stop Hinkley Expansion Campaign (SHE). The organisation was funded by Greenpeace, and headed by activist Danielle Grünberg and journalist Crispin Aubrey. SHE as one of the major opponents, spent over £50,000 on their campaign to halt construction of Hinkley C. Members participated in the 14-month long public inquiry, which ran from the end of 1988 through December 1989, and heard from over 600 witnesses. 22,000 people lodged opposition to the construction of Hinkley C.

Despite the public outcry, Queen's Counsel Michael Barnes, who conducted the hearings, recommended building the plant in 1990, but said any construction would be delayed until the review of Britain's Nuclear Policy in 1994. SHE continued to oppose the project and advocated for resources to be spent instead on wind and wave power systems. In 1995, plans were abandoned to construct Hinkley C or any other new nuclear power plants in Britain.

2000s

In January 2008 a UK government white paper announced support for a new generation of nuclear power stations to be built. Hinkley Point C, in conjunction with Sizewell C, was supposed to contribute 13% of UK electricity by the early 2020s. Areva estimated that their European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) reactor design could produce electricity at the competitive price of £24 per MWh.

EDF, which at the time was 85% owned by the French state, purchased British Energy for £12.4 billion in a deal that was finalised in February 2009, with the nuclear generation business becoming part of EDF Energy. This deal was part of a joint venture with UK utility Centrica, who acquired a 20% stake in EDF Energy Nuclear Generation Ltd as well as the option to participate in EDF Energy's UK new nuclear build programme.

In September 2008, EDF, the new owners of Hinkley Point B, announced plans to build a third, twin-unit EPR power station at Hinkley Point, to join Hinkley Point A (Magnox), which is now closed and being decommissioned, and the Hinkley Point B (AGR), which has a closure date for accounting purposes of 2023.

2010s

On 18 October 2010, the British government announced that Hinkley Point – already the site of the disused Hinkley Point A and the then still operational Hinkley Point B power stations – was one of the eight sites it considered suitable for future nuclear power stations. NNB Generation Company, a subsidiary of EDF, submitted an application for a Development Consent Order to the Infrastructure Planning Commission on 31 October 2011.

In February 2013, Centrica withdrew from the new nuclear construction programme, citing building costs that were higher than it had anticipated and a longer construction timescale caused by modifications added after the Fukushima disaster.

The Development Consent Order was published in March 2013. That same month, a group of MPs and academics, concerned that the 'talks lack the necessary democratic accountability, fiscal and regulatory checks and balances', called for the National Audit Office to conduct a detailed review of the negotiations between the Department of Energy and Climate Change and EDF.

In October 2013, the government announced that it had agreed a contract for difference for the electricity production of Hinkley Point C with a strike price of £89.50 per MWh, with the plant expected to be completed in 2023 and remain operational for 60 years.

In December 2013, the European Commission opened an investigation to assess whether the project complies with state aid rules with reports suggesting the UK government's plan may well constitute illegal state aid. Joaquín Almunia, the EU Competition Commissioner, referred to the plans as "a complex measure of an unprecedented nature and scale" and said that the European Commission is "not under any legal time pressure to complete the investigation". In January 2014, an initial critical decision was published, indicating that the UK government's plan may well constitute illegal state aid, requiring a formal state aid investigation examining the subsidies. David Howarth, a former Liberal Democrat MP, doubted "whether this is a valid contract at all" under EU and English law. Franz Leidenmühler (University of Linz, a specialist in EU state aid cases and European competition law), wrote that "a rejection is nearly unavoidable. The Statement of the Commission in its first findings of 18 December 2013, is too clear. I do not think that some conditions could change that clear result." Though given that, ten months later the European Commission approved the financing.

In March 2014, the Court of Appeal allowed An Taisce, the National Trust for Ireland, to challenge the legality of the decision by the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change to grant development consent. An Taisce lawyers say there was a failure to undertake "transboundary consultation" as required by the European Commission's Environmental Impact Assessment Directive. Lord Justice Sullivan said that though "he did not venture that it had a real prospect of success, it was desirable that the court should give a definitive view as to whether there should be a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union and, if not, on the meaning of the Directive". In July 2014, the Court of Appeal rejected An Taisce's application on the basis 'that severe nuclear accidents were very unlikely... no matter how low the threshold for a "likely" significant effect on the environment... the likelihood of a nuclear accident was so low that it could be ruled out even applying the stricter Waddenzee approach'

The UN, under the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, ordered the Department for Communities and Local Government to send a delegation to face the committee in December 2014, on the "profound suspicion" that the UK failed to properly consult neighbouring countries.

In September 2014, news leaked that "discussions with the UK authorities have led to an agreement. On this basis, vice-president Almunia will propose to the college of commissioners to take a positive decision in this case. In principle a decision should be taken within this mandate" with a final decision expected in October 2014.

On 8 October 2014, it was announced that the European Commission had approved the project, with only four commissioners voting against the decision. The European Commission adjusted the "gain-share mechanism" whereby higher profits are shared with UK taxpayers.

In June 2015, the Austrian government filed a legal complaint with the European Commission on the subject of the state subsidies. In September 2020, the court confirmed the aid approved by the commission.

In September 2015, EDF admitted that the project would not be completed by 2023, with an announcement on the final investment decision expected in October 2015. Earlier plans to announce Areva and 'other investors' were dropped: "in order to have speed, in the first phase EDF and the Chinese will be the investors". A report by the IEA and NEA suggests privatization as one of the causes for British nuclear power being more expensive than nuclear power in other countries.

In February 2016, EDF again delayed a final investment decision on the project, disclosing that the financial agreement with CGN was yet to be confirmed. EDF, which had recently reported a 68% fall in net profit, was still looking at how it would finance its share of the project. With EDF's share price having halved over the preceding year, the cost of the Hinkley Point C project now exceeded the entire market capitalisation of EDF. EDF stated that "first concrete", the start of actual construction, was not planned to begin until 2019.

In June 2016, EDF executives and managers told MPs that the Hinkley Point C proposal should be postponed until it had "solved a litany of problems", including EDF's "soaring debts". EDF said it would delay a final investment decision until September 2016.

On 28 July 2016, the EDF board approved the project when 10 out of 17 directors voted yes on the final investment decision. Gérard Magnin, a director of EDF who was opposed to the project, resigned before the vote. On the same day, the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Greg Clark announced that the government would delay its decision until the autumn of 2016 to "consider carefully all the component parts of this project", including Britain's national security.

On 8 August 2016, Liu Xiaoming, China's ambassador to Britain, wrote that the UK risked major power shortages by 2025, the Hinkley Point C project is ready to go ahead, the 'UK could not have a better partner than the China General Nuclear Power Corporation', and 'the China-UK relationship is at a crucial historical juncture'.

In August 2016, it was reported that 'civil servants are looking to see if there is any loophole, clause or issue in contracts yet to be signed that allow the Government to pull back without huge loss and while also saving face', that Beijing 'will resist any compromise on the deal', and that one option under consideration is to approve Hinkley Point C but delay a decision on the Bradwell reactor. In September 2016, the UK government announced after its review "significant new safeguards".

In February 2017, the UN, under the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, 'said the UK should consider refraining from further works' until it has heard back from other countries on whether it would be helpful for them to be formally notified under a treaty on transboundary environmental impacts.

In July 2017, the estimated construction cost had climbed in two years to £19.6 billion and was revised to £20.3 billion accounting for the fifteen months estimated delay cost, with a start date of between 2025 and 2027.

2020s

In January 2021, the estimated construction cost was revised to £22–23 billion (2015 prices), with expected start date of June 2026.

In May 2022, another year of delay and further cost rises were announced, bringing the total to an estimated £25–26 billion (2015 prices), although "the schedule and cost of electromechanical works and of final testing have not been reviewed". In July 2022, EDF warned there was a possibility of further delay to September 2028.

On 13 September 2022, a construction worker was killed on site, in a crush injury traffic accident.

In January 2024, EDF presented three scenarios for the works, including when Unit 1 would become operational; with planned installation productivity a 2029 start costing £31 billion (2015 prices, £41.6 billion in 2024 prices), with less favourable installation productivity a 2030 start costing £34 billion (2015 prices, £46.5 billion in 2024 prices) or an unfavourable scenario with 2031 start costing £35 billion (2015 prices, £47.9 billion in 2024 prices).

Construction work

Early enabling works started in July 2008, with the construction of a car park for a ground investigation programme. In 2012, EDF purchased the site of the Manor of Sydenham near Bridgwater which had previously been used as a factory site by British Cellophane, including the Grade II listed 16th century building.

In 2014, 400 staff undertook initial preparation and construction work. This work included access roads and roundabouts for increased construction traffic, park and ride schemes for the site workers, and a new roundabout for the village of Cannington. Further plans include the construction of a sea wall and a jetty for ships to deliver sand, aggregate and cement for concrete production.

In 2015, the factory site was razed to the ground for construction of temporary accommodation for 1,000 workers.

Since 2016, the construction site for Hinkley Point C has had its own bus company, Somerset Passenger Solutions (SPS), a joint venture between FirstGroup's The Buses of Somerset division and the Southern National bus company. SPS hold a contract to transport construction workers on a number of routes to, from and around the Hinkley Point C site until 2025, using up to 160 buses at the peak of construction. In September 2016, the BBC reported that if construction were to start now, the plant could become operational by 2025.

In March 2017, EDF, after the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) gave approval to start building, the building of the first parts of the plant proper began with a network of tunnels to carry cabling and piping. Work was also under way on a jetty to land building materials, a seawall, and accommodation blocks.

In January 2018, EDF said that they were on track to start generating electricity by 2025 and that they planned to start constructing above-ground structures for the power station by June 2019.

The approximate 2,000 cubic metres (71,000 cu ft) concrete pour for the first reactor started on 11 December 2018. It was completed over a 30-hour period, creating the first part of the unit one 4,500 tonne base, a platform 3.2 metres (10 ft 6 in) thick. The reactor building will be built on the (to be completed) platform. This construction start marks the first new reactor build in the UK after a 30-year break, and the second PWR in the UK, after Sizewell B.

Completion of the base for the first reactor, the final 8,954 cubic metres (316,200 cu ft) of concrete, was achieved in June 2019. Completion of the base for the second reactor, 8,991 cubic metres (317,500 cu ft) of concrete, was achieved in June 2020.

Construction utilises the world's largest crane, the Sarens SGC-250 double ring crane, which is responsible for lifting Hinkley Point C's heaviest components. More than 600 heavy fabrications, including the five major parts of each unit's steel containment liner and dome, are positioned by the SGC-250. The crane, named Big Carl, was delivered in modular form, consisting of over 400 deliveries.

In February 2023, the first nuclear reactor pressure vessel was delivered to site via the Bristol Channel Hinkley-dedicated wharf at Combwich. The pressure vessel was built in France in 2022 by Framatome.

In May 2024 the first of the 520 tonne steam generators was delivered to site in the same manner as the reactor pressure vessel.

Schedule

Permits and licences

In November 2012, it was announced that the UK's ONR had awarded a nuclear site licence to NNB Generation Company, a subsidiary created by EDF Energy. This was the first nuclear site licence awarded for a nuclear power station in the UK since 1987, when one was granted for the construction of Sizewell B in Suffolk.

In March 2013, three environmental permits setting levels for emissions from the proposed power station were granted and planning consent was given, but agreement on electricity pricing was still required before building could start.

Through 2013, the operator was in negotiations with the Department of Energy and Climate Change and other government agencies. A major sticking point was a demand by EDF Energy for a guaranteed price for the electricity to be produced, which was about twice the current UK electricity rates. The project is part of the UK's plans to implement a 50% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by the mid-2020s, which provides for building Hinkley Point C and several other nuclear power plants. By 2013, the operator had invested about £1 billion in site preparation and other start-up costs. If built, the plant will meet about 7% of the UK's electricity needs.

In 2013, Welsh ministers granted permission for EDF to dispose of construction sediment off Cardiff Bay. EDF have said the work 'is not harmful to humans or the environment' but marine pollution expert Tim Deere-Jones claimed the mud 'could expose people to radioactivity'. In 2021, the Welsh Government's expert panel Hinkley Point C Stakeholder Reference Group investigated the doses to the public and workers and concluded that 'the individual and collective doses derived were below the de minimis criteria'.

In October 2013, the government announced that it had approved the agreement of a strike price for the plant's electricity, a major condition for its construction.

In September 2016, the government confirmed it would give EDF a contract for difference for power from the project, imposing significant new safeguards for future foreign investment in critical infrastructure.

On 28 March 2017, the ONR granted its first consent to begin construction of the Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant. The consent covers the placement of the structural concrete for the first nuclear safety-related structure.

On 15 March 2019, the Environment Agency invited comments on an environmental permit application from NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited for Hinkley Point C Power Station, with a closing date of 26 July 2019.

Economics

Cost to consumers

Areva, the EPR's designer, estimated in 2006 that electricity could be produced at a price of £24 per MWh.

EDF has negotiated a guaranteed fixed price – a "strike price" – for electricity from Hinkley Point C under a government sanctioned Contract for difference (CfD). The price is £92.50/MWh (in 2012 prices), which will be adjusted (linked to inflation – £128/MWh in 2022) during the construction period and over the subsequent 35 years tariff period. The base strike price could fall to £89.50/MWh if a new plant at Sizewell is also approved.

In 2022, EDF sought to change the contract to maintain the 35 years tariff period should full operation start after May 2029, which triggers the start of the period regardless of operation status. EDF argued the COVID-19 crisis was a force majeure event, justifying the change.

In July 2016, the National Audit Office estimated that due to falling energy costs, the additional cost to consumers of 'future top-up payments under the proposed CfD for Hinkley Point C had increased from £6.1 billion in October 2013, when the strike price was agreed, to £29.7 billion'. In July 2017, this estimate rose to £50 billion, or 'more than eight times the 2013 estimate'.

Criticism

Research carried out by Imperial College Business School argues that no new nuclear power plants would be built in the UK without government intervention. Some pro-nuclear groups have also said that the 'strike price of Hinkley Point C is too high'.

In December 2013, Jim Ratcliffe, the chairman and CEO of Ineos said he had recently agreed to purchase nuclear power in France at £37.94 (€45) per MWh and warned of the Hinkley Point C project: "Forget it. Nobody in manufacturing is going to go near £95 per MWh". Also in December 2013, the chairman of Voimaosakeyhtiö SF described the Hinkley Point C strike price as 'very high', saying 'subsidies will drive prices up, as everyone will try to get as high a price as possible. Fennovoima (Hanhikivi) will be built without any subsidies, now or ever'.

A 2014 Agora Energiewende study found that new wind and solar generation is up to 50% cheaper than new nuclear, based on what they described as a conservative comparison of current feed-in tariffs in Germany with the agreed strike price for Hinkley Point C. The study does not include costs for power grid upgrades or expected future cost reductions for renewable energy and increased integration costs for variable energy resources. The annual average day ahead auction spot prices in Germany was at 95 €/MWh in 2023.

In 2016, Third Generation Environmentalism (E3G) proposed five ways that the UK could be powered at lower cost to the consumers than by Hinkley Point C:

• improved energy efficiency could reduce consumption by more than the projected capacity of Hinkley Point C, according to a McKinsey report for the government,
• onshore wind power, which is much cheaper, and offshore wind power, which is also likely to become cheaper than power from Hinkley Point C,
• solar power, which by 2016 has become cheaper than power from Hinkley Point C,
• interconnectors to Norway, Denmark and France, according to a report for NIC and
• savings in electricity due to improved storage and flexibility, according to a NIC report for the government.

In August 2016, CEO Henrik Poulsen of Danish DONG Energy argued that the UK's future energy needs can be covered with accelerated construction of cheaper offshore wind farms instead of Hinkley Point C. Poulsen stated that wind farms could currently undercut Hinkley Point C's strike price with £85/MWh, while others in the industry believe that by the mid-2020s the electricity price from offshore wind farms would reach £80/MWh. On 10 August 2016, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard of The Telegraph wrote that, with growth in energy storage there is little point in construction of baseload power plants such as Hinkley Point C and alleged that "nuclear reactors cannot be switched on and off as need demands" (see also Load following power plant#Nuclear power plants).

On 26 August 2016, the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit released a report on alternatives to Hinkley Point C. It found that a mixture of established approaches including wind farms, cables connecting the UK grid with other countries and gas-fired power stations, together with measures to manage demand, would save the UK around £1 billion per year while keeping the lights on and meeting climate targets.

On 12 October 2017, The Guardian reported that researchers informed MPs that the UK government was using the expensive Hinkley Point C project to cross-subsidise the UK military's nuclear-related activity by maintaining nuclear skills. The researchers from the University of Sussex Science Policy Research Unit, Prof. Andy Stirling and Dr. Phil Johnstone, stated that without "civil nuclear power ... UK military nuclear infrastructures would be significantly more expensive".

In 2020, EDF announced that the project had resulted in the creation of 10,300 jobs, £1.67 billion spent with companies in the region, and £119 million of community investments.

Return on equity

One analyst at Liberium Capital described the strike price as 'economically insane' in October 2013: "as far as we can see this makes Hinkley Point the most expensive power station in the world... on a leveraged basis we expect EDF to earn a Return on Equity (ROE) well in excess of 20% and possibly as high as 35%". "Having considered the known terms of the deal, we are flabbergasted that the UK Government has committed future generations of consumers to the costs that will flow from this deal".

According to a March 2014 report by Policy Connect, ROE could be between around 19 and 21%, with "broadly two possible reasons...firstly, the risks faced by EDF could genuinely be greater, therefore commanding a higher rate of return. Alternatively, or in addition, the negotiating process may not have been effective in driving down the expected rate of return relative to risk. A lack of competition in the negotiating process could have been influential here. The European Commission has questioned the likelihood of the first of these explanations, in light of what is already known about the allocation of risk".

A European Commission decision on 8 October 2014, adjusted the "gain-share mechanism" whereby higher profits are shared with UK taxpayers. Rather than a 50-50 profit share if the project returned above 15%, the revised "gain share mechanism" will see the UK taxpayer get 60 percent of any profits above a 13.5% return.

According to Dieter Helm, professor of Energy Policy at the University of Oxford, "Hinkley Point C would have been roughly half the cost if the government had been borrowing the money to build it at 2%, rather than EDF's cost of capital, which was 9%."

In July 2017, EDF said that "if the £2.2 billion cost increase came to pass, its rate of return on the project would drop from 9% to 8.2%". In September 2019, The Guardian reported that the additional cost increase in 2019 would bring EDF Energy's internal rate of return "down to between 7.6% and 7.8%".

Financing

The construction cost was given by EDF as £16 billion in 2012, updated to £18 billion in 2015, and to between £19.6 billion and £20.3 billion in July 2017. The European Commission has previously estimated £24.5 billion, including financing costs during construction. Financing for the project will be provided "by the mainly state-owned EDF state-owned CGN will pay £6 billion for one third of it". EDF 'might sell another 15% stake in the project'. In September 2015, George Osborne announced a further £2 billion UK government guarantee for financing of the project. In May 2016, a senior official at China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) said 'the final proposal is for the Chinese to take a 33.5% stake in the project. But this will be a combination of CGN and CNNC. We haven't yet decided what percentage we are going to invest'.

In February 2016, Jean Bernard Lévy, EDF Chief Executive, confirmed a 68% drop in net profits and cut in dividend, saying that a final investment decision on the project would follow 'when all this is fully organised'. Also in February 2016, another source said 'the question of the funding is far from being resolved, EDF and the French state would need to sell assets under good conditions and in a short period of time, which seems quite complex at the moment considering EDF's share price'. In March 2016, Thomas Piquemal, EDF's Chief Financial Officer resigned after 'saying the company should wait another three years before making the final investment decision on the project' where Jean Bernard Lévy disagreed 'saying he wanted it to happen as early as next month'. In March 2016, Jean Bernard Lévy wrote to EDF staff that he was in talks to 'obtain commitments from the state to help secure our financial position' and would 'not engage in the project before these conditions are met'. In March 2016, Emmanuel Macron, the French Minister of Economy, Industry and Digital Affairs said that a final investment decision would not be made until May 2016. On 25 April 2016, EDF announced plans to sell €4bn of new shares to 'help it finance the building of the Hinkley Point nuclear plant' with the French government subscribing €3bn of these shares 'as well as taking a scrip dividend option for 2016 and 2017'.

In December 2016, The Economist reported that the British loan guarantees require the EPR reactor Flamanville 3 to be operational by 2020, that the regulator will rule on the future of the Flamanville reactor mid-2017 and that one possible outcome of this ruling can delay its opening far beyond 2018, thus jeopardizing the British loan guarantees thereby preventing EDF from building the EPRs at Hinkley Point.

In 2020, the French financial markets authority, Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), levied a €5 million fine on EDF for misleading investors about the cost of the Hinkley Point C in 2014. EDF had claimed in an October 2014 press release that the UK government agreement was unchanged from 2013, when there had been significant changes to the financing plan, which may have artificially raised EDF's share price. AMF also levied a €50,000 fine on EDF's then CEO.

In December 2023, recently nationalised EDF was confirmed to be the sole private guarantor of the project as it currently stands, with CGN's exposure limited to figures agreed on in 2016. The £18 billion investment estimate underlying that deal has significantly increased since, likely to exceed a £32.7 billion estimate made in 2023 that used 2015 pricing.

In January 2024, EDF announced that it estimated that the final cost would rise to between £31-35 billion in 2015 prices depending on various risk outcomes, or between £41.6–47.9 billion in 2024 prices, and Unit 1 operational between 2029 and 2031. The site managing director said EDF had "found civil construction slower than we hoped and faced inflation, labour and material shortages, on top of Covid and Brexit disruption".

Specification

EPR

EDF is building two of Areva's EPR reactors in the UK, with a design net power output each of 1,600 MWe (1,630 MWe gross). Three EPR reactors are currently operating, two at the Taishan Nuclear Power Plant in China, and one at Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant in Finland. One other EPR unit is currently under construction at the Flamanville Nuclear Power Plant in France. The HPC design has significant changes from the previous units, with 20% more equipment than the Taishan design. The safeguards buildings have been redesigned. The HPC technical director stated in 2019 "In effect HPC is a first-of-a-kind plant in a country that has not built a new plant for three decades."

In December 2007, the Union of Concerned Scientists referred to the EPR as the only new reactor design under consideration that "...appears to have the potential to be significantly safer and more secure than today's reactors". "The French and German governments have also required Areva to enable the reactor’s safety systems and spent fuel building to withstand the crash of a military aircraft. And in the event of an accident or sabotage, the EPR’s double-walled containment structure would hold up better than the standard single-walled one."

EDF and Areva have been facing 'lengthy delays and steep cost overruns' on EPR reactors being built at Flamanville Nuclear Power Plant in France and at Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant in Finland. In October 2013, George Monbiot, a supporter of nuclear power, said that "the clunky third-generation power station chosen for Hinkley C already looks outdated, beside the promise of integral fast reactors and liquid fluoride thorium reactors. While other power stations are consuming nuclear waste (spent fuel), Hinkley will be producing it." In February 2015, France's energy minister said that 'an overhaul of the country's state-controlled nuclear energy industry was imminent'. On 13 June 2016, the Fédération Nationale des Cadres Supérieurs unveiled a series of problems with the EPR design, including that the French nuclear safety authority (ASN) may not give the green light to the EPR being constructed at Flamanville due to various anomalies, there may be "identical flaws" in the Areva EPR being built at Taishan 1 in China, falsification of parts from Areva's Le Creusot plant that potentially put safety checks at risk, and multibillion-euro litigation between Areva and the Finnish energy group TVO over delays to the EPR scheme at Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant remains unsettled.

In 2016, EDF Directors Thomas Piquemal and Gérard Magnin separately resigned over their concerns about the risk of the project. However, Chris Bakken, an EDF Project Manager, has said that EDF has full confidence they 'won't repeat the mistakes of the Finnish and French EPRs'.

Comparison with A and B

Criticism and organised opposition

A protest group, Stop Hinkley, was formed to campaign for the closure of Hinkley Point B and oppose any expansion at the Hinkley Point site or elsewhere in the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary. The group is reportedly concerned that the new generation of power stations will store nuclear waste on site until a permanent repository is found, claiming that this is an unknown length of time and could potentially take decades. The group issued a press release opposing any plans for a new power station on 24 September 2008, when it was announced that EDF had offered to acquire British Energy. The group has acknowledged that opposition in the local area is by no means unanimous.

In October 2011, more than 200 protesters blockaded the site. Members of several anti-nuclear groups that are part of the Stop New Nuclear alliance barred access to Hinkley Point power station in protest at EDF Energy's plans to renew the site with two new reactors.

In February 2012, about seven protesters set up camp in an abandoned farmhouse on the site of the proposed Hinkley Point C nuclear power station. They were reportedly angry that "West Somerset Council has given EDF Energy the go-ahead for preparatory work before planning permission has been granted". The group also claimed that a nature reserve is at risk from the proposals.

On 10 March 2012, the first anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, 200 anti-nuclear campaigners formed a symbolic chain around Hinkley Point to voice their opposition to new nuclear power plants, and to call on the coalition government to hold back on its plan for seven other new nuclear plants across the UK. The human chain was planned to continue for 24 hours, with the activists blocking the main Hinkley Point entrance.

On 8 October 2012, the Stop New Nuclear Alliance organised a mass trespass at the site earmarked for Hinkley C. A total of eight people were arrested, mainly for cutting through the wire of the perimeter fence. A march and rally was held in the nearby town of Bridgwater two days earlier.

In Germany, the renewable energy supplier Elektrizitätswerke Schönau (EWS) lodged a formal complaint on 28 November 2014 (after the October 2014 European Commission approval), on the basis that the project "breaches Article 107 TFEU by approving distortive state aids". EWS also launched an online petition, with about 168,000 supporters by June 2015.

In 2015, Nick Timothy, political adviser to Theresa May, wrote an article to oppose People's Republic of China's involvement in sensitive sectors such as the Hinkley Point C nuclear power project. He criticised David Cameron and George Osborne of "selling our national security to China" without rational concerns and "the Government seems intent on ignoring the evidence and presumably the advice of the security and intelligence agencies." He warned that security experts are worried the Chinese could use their role in the programme (designing and constructing nuclear reactor) to build weaknesses into computer systems which allow them to shut down Britain's energy production at will and "...no amount of trade and investment should justify allowing a hostile state easy access to the country's critical national infrastructure."

On 23 June 2017, the National Audit Office published a report on Hinkley Point C. The conclusions were summarised as follows: "The Department has committed electricity consumers and taxpayers to a high cost and risky deal in a changing energy marketplace. Time will tell whether the deal represents value for money, but we cannot say the Department has maximised the chances that it will be."

On 25 March 2018, The Guardian reported that: "The UK nuclear regulator has raised concerns with EDF Energy over management failings that it warns could affect safety at the Hinkley Point C power station if left unaddressed"; the original ONR report stated "some arrangements are below standard and ONR is seeking improvements against a number of Regulatory Issues that have been raised under Licence Condition 17 (Management Systems)".

Concerns have also been raised about one investor, state-owned China General Nuclear Power Group, which has been blacklisted by the United States Department of Commerce for attempting to acquire advanced US nuclear technology and material for diversion to military use. As of July 2021, over 100 Chinese engineers were working on Hinkley Point C, utilising their experience of building the first two operating EPR reactors, about 50 of whom were working on site.

Hinkley Point C was an issue in campaigning for the 2017 French presidential election, the first round of which was held in April 2017. Marine Le Pen's National Front was "fundamentally against" the project that "would divert resources from state-controlled EDF" while Emmanuel Macron was in support in the belief that it "could reinvigorate the fortunes of EDF".

In 2021 the Welsh Government's expert panel Hinkley Point C Stakeholder Reference Group investigated the potential effect of cooling water pumping on fish populations. The results of the CEFAS study TR456 Ed 2, which stated that their "analyses shows that HPC without an AFD fitted would have no adverse effect on site integrity for any of the designated sites", were contrasted with Dr Peter Henderson's calculation "that the estimated annual capture rate (impingement) of the system will be 182 million fish, and it is likely that many of these will not survive.

Timeline

• March 2008, UK (Brown ministry) and France (president: Nicolas Sarkozy) announce deal to construct new nuclear power stations
• Early enabling construction work commences
• September 2008, EDF buys British Energy
• May 2009, Centrica announces joint venture with EDF to build new nuclear power stations in UK
• October 2010, Hinkley Point announced as one of the eight candidates by the British government (Cameron–Clegg coalition)
• April 2011, Health and Safety Executive and Environment Agency delay assessment of proposed reactor designs due to Fukushima disaster
• October 2011, Application for development consent by NNB Generation Company was submitted to the Infrastructure Planning Commission
• November 2012, EDF is awarded nuclear site licence
• February 2013, Centrica pulls out of joint venture with EDF
• March 2013, EDF grants development consent order from Department of Energy and Climate Change
• October 2013, Government and EDF agree on "strike price" of Hinkley Point C
• 8 October 2014, European Commission announces that it has approved the Hinkley Point C State aid case.
• September 2015, EDF admits that the project will not complete in 2023, with a further announcement on the final investment decision expected in October 2015.
• 21 September 2015, Government announces £2 billion loan guarantee for the project
• 21 October 2015, State-owned China General Nuclear (CGN) agrees in principle to invest £6 billion into the project.
• February 2016, EDF again fails to make a final investment decision on proceeding. Financial agreement with CGN yet to be confirmed, and EDF still looking at how it would finance its share of the project.
• 28 July 2016, EDF makes the final investment decision on building Hinkley Point C. On the same day, Theresa May's government announces that it will review the project and 'make its decision in the early autumn' with government sources interpreting this to mean that the project will be approved at that time.
• 31 August 2016, Five staff representatives on the board of EDF file a legal complaint seeking to reverse EDF's decision to go ahead with the Hinkley Point project.
• 15 September 2016, British government (First May ministry) gives the go-ahead for Hinkley Point C following a new deal with EDF.
• 27 March 2017, ONR grants consent for construction of Hinkley Point C to begin.
• 3 July 2017, EDF announces that the total cost of the power station was likely to rise to between £19.6 billion and £20.3 billion, depending upon the overrun. A government spokeswoman says "the cost of construction, including any overruns, sits with the contractor".
• 25 September 2019, EDF announces that the total cost of the power station was likely to rise by up to £2.9 billion and the total bill could be more than £22 billion
• 1 June 2020, EDF announces that the reactor base for unit 2 has been completed at a much faster rate than unit 1. This was down to the base being almost identical to unit 1. As a result, the steel was installed 45% faster, the liner cup floor was constructed 30% faster and the cooling system components were installed 50% faster.
• 14 September 2020, EDF announces that the lift for the 170-tonne liner cup was completed 30% quicker than the identical part on Unit 1, despite restrictions in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
• 15 December 2023, World’s largest crane places 47-metre-wide dome onto Hinkley Point C’s first reactor building
• 8 February 2024, National Grid has performed 4 million man-hours of work upgrading the grid around HPC. A 174-tonne 400kV supergrid transformer was sent from Rotterdam up the river Parrett to upgrade the Bridgwater substation in Somerset.
• 14 October 2024, last containment vessel liner ring on Unit 2 was lifted into place.
• 3 December 2024, reactor pressure vessel was installed in Unit 1.

1980s PWR proposal

An earlier proposal for a Hinkley Point C power station was made by the Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) in the 1980s for a sister power station to Sizewell B, using the same pressurised water reactor design, at a cost of £1.7 billion. This proposal obtained planning permission in 1990 following a public inquiry, but was dropped as uneconomic in the early 1990s when the electric power industry was privatised and low interest rate government finance was no longer available.

Gallery

• Aerial view of the power plant
• Exterior view of the power plant
• Hinkley Point A, seen from the entrance to Hinkley Point B
• Hinkley Point B

See also

• Moorside clean energy hub
• Energy policy of the United Kingdom
• Energy use and conservation in the United Kingdom
• Nuclear power in the United Kingdom
• Proposed nuclear power stations in the United Kingdom

References

1. "Work starts on Hinkley Point C - new pictures reveal epic scale of project". Bristol Post. March 2017. Archived from the original on 28 May 2022. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
2. ^ Dalton, David (24 January 2024). "Hinkley Point C / UK Nuclear Station Could Be Delayed To 2031 And Cost Up Top £46 Billion, Says EDF". Nucnet. Archived from the original on 24 January 2024. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
3. ^ "EDF 2024 Half Year Results" (PDF). p. 33.
4. "Government closes 'historic' deal to build first nuclear plant in a generation". ITV News. 21 October 2013. Archived from the original on 31 December 2013. Retrieved 31 December 2013.
5. ^ "Nuclear power: Eight sites identified for future plants". BBC News. 18 October 2010. Archived from the original on 19 October 2010. Retrieved 18 October 2010.
6. ^ "Hinkley Point nuclear station: Licence granted for site". BBC News. 26 November 2012. Archived from the original on 27 November 2012. Retrieved 27 November 2012.
7. ^ Graham Ruddick (28 July 2016). "Hinkley Point C to go ahead after EDF board approves project". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 29 July 2016. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
8. ^ "Government confirms Hinkley Point C project following new agreement in principle with EDF". GOV.UK. 15 September 2016. Archived from the original on 16 September 2016. Retrieved 15 September 2016.
9. ^ "Hinkley Point nuclear agreement reached". BBC News. 21 October 2015. Archived from the original on 21 October 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
10. "Hinkley Point C delayed by a year as cost goes up by £3bn". BBC News. 20 May 2022. Archived from the original on 21 May 2022. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
11. ^ "Hinkley Point C delayed by a year as cost goes up by £3bn". BBC News. 21 May 2022. Archived from the original on 21 May 2022. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
12. ^ "Hinkley Point C Update | EDF FR". www.edf.fr. 20 December 2022. Retrieved 7 August 2024.
13. "EDF faces shouldering more of soaring bill for Hinkley Point". Financial Times. 17 February 2023. Archived from the original on 17 February 2023. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
14. "EDF Says Price Tag of UK Nuclear Power Plant Soars on Inflation". Bloomberg. 18 February 2023. Archived from the original on 16 March 2023. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
15. "EDF 2022 Annual Results" (PDF). 17 February 2023. p. 25.
16. ^ Jack, Simon (24 January 2024). "Hinkley C: UK nuclear plant price tag could rocket by a third". BBC News. Archived from the original on 24 January 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
17. ^ "EDF announces Hinkley Point C delay and rise in project cost". World Nuclear News. 23 January 2024. Archived from the original on 25 January 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
18. ^ "Hinkley Point C Update | EDF FR". www.edf.fr. 23 January 2024. Retrieved 7 August 2024.
19. "Debate". Western Daily Press. Bristol, England. 19 February 1981. p. 9. Retrieved 27 May 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
20. ^ "Hinkley Point Nuclear Timeline". Stop Hinkley. Yeabridge, South Petherton: Stop Hinkley Organization. 2020. Archived from the original on 25 May 2022. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
21. Stokes, Ray (4 October 1982). "Now It's Hinkley Point No 4". The Evening Post. Bristol, Avon. p. 3. Retrieved 27 May 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
22. Bruce, Malcolm (February–March 1984). "The Oxford Review" (PDF). Scram. 40. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Campaign to Resist the Atomic Menace: 14–15. ISSN 0140-7341. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 December 2022. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
23. ^ "N-Plant Protests Go on". The Evening Post. Bristol, Avon. 8 September 1990. p. 2. Retrieved 27 May 2024 – via The British Newspaper Archive.
24. ^ Roberts, Jane (March 1991). "Clarity, Ambivalence or Confusion? An Assessment of Pressure Group Motives at the Hinkley Point 'C' Public Inquiry". Energy & Environment. 2 (1). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishing: 45–67. Bibcode:1991EnEnv...2...45R. doi:10.1177/0958305X9100200103. ISSN 0958-305X. JSTOR 43734099. OCLC 6066755770. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
25. ^ "Hinkley Public Inquiry Finishes". Shepton Mallet Journal. Shepton Mallet, Somerset. 7 December 1989. p. 5. Retrieved 27 May 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
26. "Chernobyl Remembered". The Evening Post. Bristol, Avon. 12 April 1991. p. 11. Retrieved 27 May 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
27. Fagan, Mary; Arthur, Charles (12 December 1995). "Britain's Nuclear Era Comes to an End". The Independent. London, UK. Archived from the original on 5 October 2022. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
28. "New nuclear plants get go-ahead". BBC News. 10 January 2008. Archived from the original on 22 February 2009. Retrieved 10 January 2010.
29. ^ "New dawn for UK nuclear power". World Nuclear News. 24 September 2008. Archived from the original on 25 September 2008. Retrieved 25 September 2008.
30. ^ "Britain's nuclear strategy exposed at Hinkley Point". Financial Times. 18 February 2016. Archived from the original on 20 February 2016. Retrieved 19 February 2016.
31. Harris, John (21 October 2013). "Hinkley Point nuclear power station: a new type of nationalisation". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016.
32. "Nuclear energy: British Energy facts". The Daily Telegraph. London. 24 September 2008. Archived from the original on 27 September 2008. Retrieved 25 September 2008.
33. DECC (18 October 2010). "Written Ministerial Statement on energy policy: The Rt Hon Chris Huhne MP, 18 October 2010". Archived from the original on 20 September 2016. Retrieved 5 August 2016.
34. "Hinkley Point C New Nuclear Power Station". Infrastructure Planning Commission. Archived from the original on 10 August 2015. Retrieved 14 September 2009.
35. Carrington, Damian (4 February 2013). "Centrica withdraws from new UK nuclear projects". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 23 May 2013.
36. "Hinkley Point C Planning". Archived from the original on 1 December 2022. Retrieved 1 December 2022.
37. "MPs and academics call for National Audit Office to review nuclear negotiations". The Telegraph. 6 April 2013. Archived from the original on 21 May 2014. Retrieved 16 April 2014.
38. ^ "UK nuclear power plant gets go-ahead". BBC News. 21 October 2013. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013.
39. European Commission (18 December 2013). State aid SA. 34947 (2013/C) (ex 2013/N) — United Kingdom Investment Contract (early Contract for Difference) for the Hinkley Point C New Nuclear Power Station (PDF). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
40. ^ "Brussels begins Hinkley investigation". World Nuclear News. 18 December 2013. Archived from the original on 22 December 2013. Retrieved 21 December 2013.
41. ^ Emily Gosden (31 January 2014). "Nuclear setback as EC attacks Hinkley Point subsidy deal". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 1 February 2014. Retrieved 3 February 2014.
42. ^ "'Hinkley Point nuclear power contract 'may be invalid'". BBC News. 6 May 2014. Archived from the original on 6 May 2014.
43. ^ Oliver Adelman (8 May 2014). "European Commission likely to find Hinkley aid illegal: Europe". Platts. Archived from the original on 6 March 2016.
44. Foo Yun Chee (18 December 2013). "EU regulators investigate EDF British nuclear project". Reuters. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016.
45. "Judge allows Ireland's National Trust to challenge Hinkley power plant go-ahead". Western Morning News. 27 March 2014. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014. Retrieved 2 April 2014.
46. "Hinkley Point C — Court of appeal rejects challenge". ftb. 1 August 2014. Archived from the original on 19 October 2014. Retrieved 8 August 2014.
47. "Pressure mounting over £16 billion nuclear site for Hinkley Point". The Independent. 22 March 2014. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014. Retrieved 2 April 2014.
48. "Hinkley nuclear power plant recommended for approval". BBC News. 22 September 2014. Archived from the original on 22 September 2014. Retrieved 22 September 2014.
49. ^ "Commission Decision of 08.10.2014 on the Aid Measure SA.34947 (2013/C) (ex 2013/N)" (PDF). European Commission. 8 October 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 November 2015.
50. "Austria to file legal complaint against UK's Hinkley Point nuclear plans". The Telegraph. 23 June 2015. Archived from the original on 24 June 2015. Retrieved 24 June 2015.
51. "Austria fails in attempt to block Hinkley Point C". World Nuclear News. 22 September 2020. Archived from the original on 23 September 2020. Retrieved 22 September 2020.
52. "Nuclear delay: EDF admits Hinkley Point won't be ready by 2023". The Telegraph. 3 September 2015. Archived from the original on 9 September 2015. Retrieved 4 September 2015.
53. "Summary" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 September 2015.
54. Rogers, David (4 September 2015). "Report claims UK nuclear costs 'highest in world' as EDF admits Hinkley Point delay". Global Construction Review. Archived from the original on 21 August 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2016.
55. ^ Emily Gosden (16 February 2016). "EDF admits Hinkley Point funding not finalised as it extends life of old reactors". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 17 February 2016. Retrieved 18 February 2016.
56. ^ "Decision on new nuclear power plant 'delayed'". BBC News. 27 January 2016. Archived from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 18 February 2016.
57. Macalister, Terry (18 June 2016). "Hinkley Point should be postponed". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 June 2016.
58. "Hinkley Point C: EDF's Board of Directors approves the final investment decision". EDF Energy. Archived from the original on 3 January 2019. Retrieved 7 August 2016.
59. Ruddick, Graham (28 July 2016). "Resignation of EDF director paves way for Hinkley Point go-ahead". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 29 July 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2016.
60. Emily Gosden (28 July 2016). "Government delays Hinkley nuclear decision despite EDF approval for £18 billion project". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 29 July 2016. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
61. Liu Xiaoming (8 August 2016). "Hinkley Point is a test of mutual trust between UK and China". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 11 August 2016.
62. Joe Watts (24 August 2016). "Hinkley Point nuclear power station: Whitehall officials 'exploring ways UK could pull out of deal'". Independent. Archived from the original on 27 August 2016.
63. Brendan Cole (29 August 2016). "China 'will refuse' to rewrite terms of Hinkley Point C nuclear plant deal". International Business Times. Archived from the original on 30 August 2016.
64. Sean Farrell (29 August 2016). "UK government could approve Hinkley Point but delay Essex project". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 30 August 2016.
65. Mason, Rowena; Goodley, Simon (15 September 2016). "Hinkley Point C nuclear power station gets government green light". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 15 September 2016. Retrieved 15 September 2016.
66. "Hinkley Point: UK approves nuclear plant deal". BBC News. 15 September 2016. Archived from the original on 15 September 2016. Retrieved 15 September 2016.
67. Vaughan, Adam (20 March 2017). "UN asks UK to suspend work on Hinkley Point". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 23 March 2017. Retrieved 24 March 2017.
68. ^ "Cost of Hinkley Point nuclear plant climbs another £1.5 billion to over £20 billion, as project is again delayed". The Telegraph. 3 July 2017. Archived from the original on 17 September 2018. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
69. ^ "Hinkley Point C nuclear plant to open later at greater cost". BBC News. 27 January 2021. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
70. ^ Thomas, Nathalie (22 July 2022). "EDF pushes UK government to alter Hinkley Point C penalty clauses". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 22 July 2022. Retrieved 23 July 2022.
71. "Hinkley Point C construction worker killed in 'traffic incident'". BBC News. 13 November 2022. Archived from the original on 13 November 2022. Retrieved 13 November 2022.
72. "Worker killed at Hinkley Point C named as Jason Waring". bbc.com. 18 November 2022. Archived from the original on 12 August 2023. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
73. "GES006 - British Cellophane Factory, Bridgwater". Guerrillaexploring. Archived from the original on 18 September 2016. Retrieved 9 October 2016.
74. "Sydenham Manor House". National heritage List for England. Historic England. Archived from the original on 10 October 2016. Retrieved 9 October 2016.
75. Macalister, Terry (21 November 2014). "Hinkley Point C: the colossus Whitehall wants but is struggling to believe in". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 21 November 2014. Retrieved 21 November 2014.
76. Redman, Leigh. "Revised submission following EDF Updated Draft Development Consent Order and Proposed Mitigation" (PDF). Infrastructure Planning Inspectorate. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 9 October 2016.
77. Buckley, Colin. "Sydenham Manor House, Bridgwater". British Listed Buildings. Archived from the original on 9 May 2016. Retrieved 9 October 2016.
78. Moylan, John (15 September 2016). "Hinkley Point: What is it and why is it important?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 February 2017. Retrieved 10 March 2017.
79. Ward, Andrew (31 March 2017). "Hinkley Point construction gets under way". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 7 April 2017. Retrieved 7 April 2017.
80. "30-hour Concrete Pour Completed At Hinkley Point C". nuclearstreet.com. Media X Group Digital. 13 December 2018. Archived from the original on 13 December 2018. Retrieved 9 January 2019.
81. "Milestone for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station". ITV News. 28 June 2019. Archived from the original on 1 July 2019. Retrieved 3 July 2019.
82. "Base completed for Hinkley Point C unit 2". Nuclear Engineering International. 2 June 2020. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 4 June 2020.
83. Walker, Shell (7 August 2019). "Delivering the World's Largest Crane". Collett & Sons. Archived from the original on 16 February 2023. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
84. "Hinkley Point: World's largest crane begins work in Somerset". BBC News Online. 11 September 2019. Archived from the original on 12 September 2019. Retrieved 12 September 2019.
85. "Big Carl: World's biggest crane starts work at Hinkley Point C". BBC News Online. 11 September 2019. Archived from the original on 12 September 2019. Retrieved 12 September 2019.
86. "Somerset: Nuclear reactor arrives at Hinkley C power station". BBC News. 27 February 2023. Archived from the original on 27 February 2023. Retrieved 27 February 2023.
87. "Work finishes on Hinkley Point C's first reactor". EDF Energy. 8 February 2023. Archived from the original on 27 February 2023. Retrieved 27 February 2023.
88. "New images show Hinkley Point C's heaviest delivery yet as the first steam generator arrives". 12 May 2024.
89. Halfpenny-Ray, Shayne (4 December 2017). "Kick Off At Hinkley Point C". Industry Link (Winter 2017): 13. Archived from the original on 23 May 2022. Retrieved 7 January 2020.
90. "Hinkley Point C Sea Wall". Construction Excellence. BRE. 6 August 2019. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 6 January 2020.
91. "Hinkley Point C hits its biggest milestone yet". EDF Energy. Archived from the original on 27 December 2019. Retrieved 6 January 2020.
92. "Hinkley Point C project achieves latest major milestone on schedule". EDF Energy. Archived from the original on 8 June 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
93. "Hinkley Point C reaches another key milestone as tunnelling commences". EDF Energy. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 6 January 2020.
94. Harvey, Dave (29 September 2021). "Hinkley nuclear power station on track for 2026 opening". BBC News. Archived from the original on 29 September 2021. Retrieved 29 September 2021.
95. "Hinkley Point C delayed until at least 2026". World Nuclear News. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2021.
96. Dave Harvey (19 March 2013). "What price nuclear power? The final hurdle for Hinkley". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 March 2013. Retrieved 19 March 2013.
97. "Environmental permits granted for Hinkley Point station". BBC News. 13 March 2013. Archived from the original on 16 March 2013. Retrieved 14 March 2013.
98. Stanley Reed; Stephen Castle (15 March 2013). "Britain's Plans for New Nuclear Plant Approach a Decisive Point, 4 Years Late". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 19 March 2013. Retrieved 16 March 2013.
99. Messengert, Steffan (25 September 2017). "Plans to dump Hinkley Point mud off south Wales criticised". BBC News. Archived from the original on 27 September 2017. Retrieved 28 September 2017.
100. ^ "The Hinkley Point C Stakeholder reference group". gov.wales. 18 March 2021. Archived from the original on 12 August 2023. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
101. ^ "The implications of Hinkley Point C for Wales' environment and its people" (PDF). Hinkley Point C Stakeholder Reference Group. 16 March 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 August 2023. Retrieved 12 August 2023 – via gov.wales.
102. ^ Roland Gribben and Denise Roland (21 October 2013). "Hinkley Point nuclear power plant to create 25,000 jobs, says Cameron". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013.
103. Nuclear Engineering International news letter, retrieved 3 April 2017
104. "TA5 1UD, NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited, EPR/HP3228XT/V004: environmental permit consultation / appeal documentation - Environment Agency - Citizen Space". consult.environment-agency.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 12 July 2019. Retrieved 12 July 2019.
105. Yeomans$, Jon (23 January 2022). "Emmanuel Macron hammers EDF as Britain's nuclear energy future hangs in the balance". The Sunday Times. London. Archived from the original on 23 January 2022. Retrieved 23 January 2022.
106. Harvey, Dave (15 December 2023). "Hinkley C nuclear reactor roof lifted into place". BBC News. Archived from the original on 15 December 2023. Retrieved 15 December 2023.
107. Department of Environment and Climate Change (13 July 2016). "Nuclear Power in the UK" (PDF). National Audit Office. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 July 2016.
108. Gosden, Emily (13 July 2016). "Hinkley Point subsidy bill quadruples as power price forecasts fall". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 5 August 2016.
109. "Hinkley Point's cost to consumers surges to £50 billion". The Daily Telegraph. 18 July 2017. Archived from the original on 5 August 2017. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
110. Richard Green and Iain Staffell (25 November 2013). "The impact of government interventions on investment in the GB electricity market" (PDF). Imperial College Business School. Archived from the original on 9 May 2015.
111. "The cost of new nuclear and Wylfa Newydd". HM Parliament. Archived from the original on 25 August 2016.
112. "Ineos boss says Hinkley nuclear power too expensive". BBC News. 16 December 2013. Archived from the original on 16 December 2013.
113. Beckman, Karel (21 December 2013). "Rosatom signs contract to build nuclear plant for Fennovoima in Finland". Energy Post. Archived from the original on 26 February 2014.
114. ^ Fürstenwerth, Daniel (2014). "Comparing the cost of low-carbon technologies : what is the cheapest option? : an analysis of new wind, solar, nuclear and CCS based on current support schemes in the UK and Germany" (PDF). agora-energiewende.de. Berlin, Germany. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 January 2022. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
115. "Energy-Charts".
116. Carrington, Damian (18 March 2016). "Five ways to power the UK that are far better than Hinkley Point". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
117. Macalister, Terry (4 August 2016). "Hinkley Point C is not only new energy option, says windfarm developer". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 6 August 2016. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
118. Evans-Pritchard, Ambrose (10 August 2016). "Holy Grail of energy policy in sight as battery technology smashes the old order". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 August 2016.
119. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (August 2016). "Hinkley: What If? Can the UK solve its energy trilemma without Hinkley Point C?'" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 October 2016.
120. Watt, Holly (12 October 2017). "Electricity consumers 'to fund nuclear weapons through Hinkley Point C'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 12 October 2017. Retrieved 13 October 2017.
121. Stirling, Andy; Johnstone, Phil (27 September 2017). "Some Queries over Neglected Strategic Factors in Public Accounting for UK Nuclear Power: evidence to the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee Inquiry on Hinkley Point C". p. 2. If a UK withdrawal from civil nuclear power on grounds of uncompetitive economics were to leave these shared costs borne entirely on the military side, then UK military nuclear infrastructures would be significantly more expensive. If civil nuclear commitments are being maintained (despite adverse economics) in order to help cover these shared costs, then it is this that amounts to a cross-subsidy.
122. "Realising the socio-economic benefits". EDF Energy. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
123. "Hinkley Point: nuclear power plant gamble worries economic analysts". The Guardian. 30 October 2013. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016.
124. Laura Kuenssberg (30 October 2013). "Ouch — energy analyst is 'staggered' by UK's nuclear deal'". ITV News. Archived from the original on 31 October 2013.
125. Fabrice Leveque and Andrew Robertson (March 2014). "Future Electricity Series: Power from Nuclear'" (PDF). Policy Connect. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 April 2014.
126. "Government U-turn on nuclear deal". BBC News Online. 4 June 2018. Archived from the original on 20 July 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
127. "Hinkley point C" (PDF). National Audit Office. 23 June 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 November 2017. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
128. "Hinkley Point C is £2.2 billion over budget and a year behind schedule, EDF admits". The Guardian. 3 July 2017. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
129. ^ Ambrose, Jillian (25 September 2019). "Hinkley Point nuclear plant building costs rise by up to £2.9 billion". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
130. "Building our industrial future". EDF. Archived from the original on 26 November 2015. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
131. ^ Farrell, Sean; Macalister, Terry (21 October 2015). "Work to begin on Hinkley Point reactor within weeks after China deal signed". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 July 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2016.
132. ^ "Hinkley Point: EDF raises cost estimate for nuclear plant". BBC News. 3 July 2017. Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
133. Katie Allen and Terry Macalister (21 September 2015). "Nuclear plant project a step closer as Osborne makes £2 billion guarantee". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 27 September 2015. Retrieved 21 September 2015. George Osborne has underlined his determination to get the government's nuclear energy programme moving by providing a £2 billion government guarantee for the delayed Hinkley Point power plant project.
134. Ben Wright (7 May 2016). "Second Chinese company poised to invest in Hinkley Point". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 3 August 2016. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
135. Michael Stothard, Kiran Stacey (14 February 2016). "EDF shortfall adds to nuclear plant delay". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 18 February 2016. Retrieved 23 February 2016.
136. Michael Stothard (7 March 2016). "EDF finance chief quits over decision to push on with Hinkley Point". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 8 March 2016. Retrieved 7 March 2016.
137. Terry Macalister (7 March 2016). "Hinkley Point nuclear project in crisis as EDF finance director resigns". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 7 March 2016.
138. "EDF could axe Hinkley Point unless France increases funding". The Daily Telegraph. 11 March 2016. Archived from the original on 12 March 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
139. Wilson, Bill (22 March 2016). "EDF decision on Hinkley Point put back until early May". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 March 2016. Retrieved 22 March 2016.
140. Gosden, Emily (25 April 2016). "EDF shares tumble on plan to raise cash to help fund Hinkley Point". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 28 August 2016.
141. "France's nuclear-energy champion is in turmoil". The Economist. 3 December 2016. Archived from the original on 4 December 2016. Retrieved 4 December 2016.
142. Ambrose, Jillian (31 July 2020). "Hinkley Point C: French watchdog fines EDF €5m for false claims on cost". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
143. Pickard, Jim; White, Sarah (14 December 2023). "EDF told not to expect UK to step in to fund flagship nuclear project". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023. Retrieved 15 December 2023.
144. "Hinkley Point, United Kingdom". Areva. Archived from the original on 22 June 2012. Retrieved 7 August 2012.
145. "Hinkley Point C New Nuclear Power Station". National Infrastructure Planning. Archived from the original on 17 February 2013. Retrieved 5 March 2013.
146. "Costs and financing key to Europe's nuclear future". World Nuclear News. 7 November 2019. Archived from the original on 8 November 2019. Retrieved 8 November 2019.
147. ^ "Nuclear Power in a Warming World" (PDF). Union of Concerned Scientists. December 2007. p. 60. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 October 2008. Retrieved 1 October 2008.
148. ^ David Jolley and Stanley Reed (23 February 2015). "France Warns of Nuclear Industry Shake-Up After Areva Loss". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 1 October 2015.
149. Kanter, James (28 May 2009). "In Finland, Nuclear Renaissance Runs Into Trouble". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 15 April 2016.
150. Kanter, James (9 May 2009). "Is the Nuclear Renaissance Fizzling?". New York Times Green Blogs. Archived from the original on 16 January 2010.
151. Broomby, Rob (8 July 2009). "Nuclear dawn delayed in Finland". BBC News. Archived from the original on 8 July 2013.
152. Monbiot, George (21 October 2013). "The farce of the Hinkley C nuclear reactor will haunt Britain for decades". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 25 October 2013. Retrieved 25 October 2013.
153. "Correspondence from the Fédération Nationale des Cadres Supérieurs to the Chair, 13 June 2016" (PDF). HM Parliament. 13 June 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 August 2016.
154. Macalister, Terry (17 June 2016). "EDF's top managers tell MPs that Hinkley Point should be postponed". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 June 2016.
155. "Finance director's resignation highlights deep concern about nuclear project's risks". Financial Times. 7 March 2016. Archived from the original on 14 May 2016.
156. "New Hinkley Point nuclear power station may be further delayed". The Guardian. 3 September 2015. Archived from the original on 29 July 2016.
157. "EDF's nuclear troubles rooted in caution". Financial Times. 20 March 2016. Archived from the original on 26 May 2016.
158. "Hinkley Point C Pre-Application Consultation". EDF Energy. Archived from the original on 30 December 2019. Retrieved 30 December 2019.
159. "Plant Safety Features". Nuclear Safety. 88: 27. 1969. Retrieved 16 December 2019.
160. ^ Hinkley Point B Nuclear Power Station. London: Central Electricity Generating Board. April 1971. p. 4.
161. Hassan, Yassin A (22 September 2010). Nuclear Energy Materials And Reactors (II ed.). EOLSS Publications. p. 17. ISBN 9781848263123. Retrieved 22 December 2019.
162. John, Way. "The Worlds reactors Number 43 Hinkley Point B". New Mexico Digital Collections. Nuclear Engineering. Archived from the original on 5 February 2021. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
163. Jensen and Nonbol (November 1998). Description of the Magnox type of gas cooled reactor (MAGNOX) (PDF) (NKS-2 ed.). NKS. p. 59. ISBN 87-7893-050-2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 December 2019. Retrieved 16 December 2019.
164. "The Worlds Reactors Number 19 Hinkley Point". New Mexico Digital Collections. University of New Mexico. Archived from the original on 5 February 2021. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
165. "Hinkley Point B power station March 2016 monthly report" (PDF). Combwich. EDF Energy. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 October 2020. Retrieved 9 January 2020.
166. Watt, Holly (21 December 2017). "Hinkley Point: the 'dreadful deal' behind the world's most expensive power plant". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2019.
167. "Hinkley point c pre-Application consultation - Stage 1" (PDF). Environment Agency. EDF Energy. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 July 2019. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
168. "In depth: Hinkley Point C proposals". BBC News. 17 March 2010. Archived from the original on 7 October 2013.
169. "Response to BE takeover by EDF". Stop Hinkley. 24 September 2008. Archived from the original on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 25 September 2008.
170. "Hinkley Point power station blockaded by anti-nuclear protesters". The Guardian. 3 October 2011. Archived from the original on 11 June 2016.
171. "Anti-nuclear campaigners set up camp at Hinkley C site". BBC News. 12 February 2012. Archived from the original on 18 February 2012.
172. "Hinkley Point: Arrests over trespass". BBC News. 8 October 2012. Archived from the original on 19 May 2021. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
173. "Rechtsanwältin Dr. Cornelia Ziehm" (PDF). Elektrizitätswerke Schönau. 28 November 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 June 2015.
174. "No Money for Nuclear Power - Stop Brussels!". Elektrizitätswerke Schönau. Archived from the original on 27 June 2015.
175. "Why have ministers delayed final approval for Hinkley Point C?". The Guardian. 29 July 2016. Archived from the original on 30 July 2016.
176. Nick Timothy: The Government is selling our national security to China Archived 31 July 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Conservative Home, 20 October 2015
177. "Theresa May 'raised objections to project as home secretary'". The Guardian. 30 July 2016. Archived from the original on 31 July 2016.
178. "Hinkley Point C - National Audit Office (NAO) Report". National Audit Office. 23 June 2017. Archived from the original on 2 July 2017. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
179. Vaughan, Adam (25 March 2018). "Nuclear watchdog raises Hinkley Point C concerns". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 June 2018. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
180. "Chief Nuclear Inspector's Inspection of NNB GenCo Ltd.'s Supply Chain Management Arrangements for the Hinkley Point C Project" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 June 2021.
181. Cook, James (15 August 2019). "Questions raised over China's involvement in Hinkley Point after US trade blacklist". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 28 April 2020. Retrieved 13 April 2020 – via www.telegraph.co.uk.
182. "China General Nuclear Power accused of espionage with its adviser in the US". South China Morning Post. 11 August 2016. Archived from the original on 10 July 2020. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
183. "Four China Nuclear Industry Companies Added to "Entity List"". Pillsbury Law. Archived from the original on 9 June 2020. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
184. Pickard, Jim; Thomas, Nathalie (25 July 2021). "UK looks to remove China's CGN from nuclear power projects". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 3 February 2022. Retrieved 3 February 2022.
185. Ambrose, Jillian (10 April 2017). "Marine Le Pen could pull the plug on Hinkley Point project if elected". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 April 2017.
186. Cockburn, Harry (17 March 2021). "Hinkley Point C nuclear plant 'could suck up 182 million fish a year'". The Independent. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
187. Robinson, Brian; Walmsley, Sarah; Maxwell, David (8 February 2019). "Revised Predictions of Impingement Effects at Hinkley Point C – 2018 Edition 2" (PDF). p. 110.
188. Henderson, Peter. "Estimated Impingement and Entrainment at Hinkley B and C" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 August 2024.
189. "UK guarantees £2 billion nuclear plant deal as China investment announced". BBC News. 21 September 2015. Archived from the original on 1 September 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2016.
190. "Hinkley Point: Surprise delay for nuclear plant deal". BBC News. 29 July 2016. Archived from the original on 30 July 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2016.
191. Gosden, Emily (28 July 2016). "New Hinkley Point nuclear plant in doubt as Government delays decision despite EDF approval for £18 billion project". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 3 August 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2016.
192. "Breaking International News & Views". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2 September 2016. Retrieved 8 September 2016.
193. "Hinkley Point: UK approves nuclear plant deal". BBC News. 15 September 2016. Archived from the original on 15 September 2016. Retrieved 15 September 2016.
194. Twudake, Susanna. "EDF gets consent to start building Hinkley C plant". Reuters. Archived from the original on 30 March 2017. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
195. "hpc efficiencies brochure; final" (PDF). EDF. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
196. "Completion of the second reactor base has benefited from experience gained on the first identical unit – leading to increases in productivity". Twitter. EDF. Archived from the original on 1 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
197. "On time and built 30% faster – major lift milestone for Hinkley Point C's second reactor". EDF Energy. 14 September 2020. Archived from the original on 15 September 2020. Retrieved 15 September 2020.
198. "Big Carl's spectacular dome lift caps the year at Hinkley Point C". EDF. 15 December 2023. Archived from the original on 28 January 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2024.
199. "National Grid celebrates 4 million hours worked on the Hinkley Connection Project | National Grid Group". www.nationalgrid.com. 8 February 2024.
200. Mavrokefalidis, Dimitris (21 June 2024). "Giant transformers delivered to boost electricity network". Energy Live News.
201. "New photos show giant crane lifting final steel liner ring at Hinkley Point C". 14 October 2024.
202. "First nuclear reactor for a generation is fitted to British power station". 4 December 2024.
203. "Electricity Generating Capacity: Nuclear Power". Hansard. 1 March 1990. HL Deb 1 March 1990 vol 516 cc828-30. Archived from the original on 2 October 2012. Retrieved 9 June 2009.
204. "In brief — Hinkley "approved"". World Information Service on Energy. 14 September 1990. Archived from the original on 30 December 2013. Retrieved 30 December 2013.
205. "Hinkley C Nuclear Power Station given planning permission". Construction News. 14 September 1990. Archived from the original on 13 January 2020. Retrieved 17 November 2009.
206. "The nuclear energy option in the UK" (PDF). Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. December 2003. postnote 208. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 January 2006. Retrieved 9 June 2009.

External links

• Official website
• HPC Development Consent Order Application (Summary). 2011. 32 pages.

v t e Electricity generation in South West England
Power stations	Coal Closed Carn Brea Castle Meads East Yelland Exeter Hayle Lydney Newton Abbot Plymouth Poole Portishead A + B Gas Active Chickerell Chippenham Cranbrook Indian Queens Langage Seabank Closed Princetown Geothermal Closed Rosemanowes Quarry Future United Downs Tidal Proposed Severn Barrage Nuclear Closed Berkeley Hinkley Point A + B Oldbury Winfrith Future Hinkley Point C Oil Closed Portishead B Wave Active Wave Hub Wind Active Carland Cross Cold Northcott Delabole Den Brook Forrest Moor Goonhilly Downs
Organisations	Ecogen Ecotricity Geothermal Engineering Good Energy Infralec Marine Current Turbines Mendip Power Group Npower Nuclear Electric Ovo Energy Pre-nationalisation electric power companies South Somerset Hydropower Group SWEB Energy Western Power Distribution Wind Prospect

v t e Nuclear power in the United Kingdom
Energy in the United Kingdom Nuclear power
Companies	Current Great British Nuclear EDF Energy Magnox Ltd Rolls-Royce Sellafield Ltd Sheffield Forgemasters Urenco New build operators NNB Generation Company Horizon Nuclear Power Defunct British Energy British Nuclear Group Magnox Electric Nuclear Electric Scottish Nuclear NuGeneration
Organisations	Civil Nuclear Constabulary Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Nuclear Industry Association Nuclear Institute Nuclear Liabilities Fund Office for Nuclear Regulation United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority United Kingdom National Nuclear Laboratory
Reactors	AGR Hartlepool Heysham 1 Heysham 2 Torness AGR (closed) Dungeness B Hinkley Point B Hunterston B FBR (closed) Dounreay Magnox (closed) Berkeley Bradwell Calder Hall Chapelcross Dungeness A Hinkley Point A Hunterston A Oldbury Sizewell A Trawsfynydd Wylfa PWR Active Sizewell B Planned Bradwell B Hinkley Point C Moorside Sizewell C
Non-reactor sites	Capenhurst uranium enrichment Sellafield Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant Windscale fire Springfields (fuel manufacture) Winfrith (research and development)
Anti-nuclear	Energy Fair
Other	Franco-British Nuclear Forum Nuclear or Not? Nuclear Power and the Environment Nuclear power in Scotland Sustainable Development Commission
Category

• Power stations in Somerset
• Proposed nuclear power stations in the United Kingdom
• Nuclear power stations using EPR reactors
• Proposed power stations in England
• Électricité de France
• Nuclear power stations with reactors under construction