Misplaced Pages

Algebra extension

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Idealization of a module) Surjective ring homomorphism with a given codomain For the ring-theoretic equivalent of a field extension, see Subring#Ring extension. Not to be confused with Algebraic extension.

In abstract algebra, an algebra extension is the ring-theoretic equivalent of a group extension.

Precisely, a ring extension of a ring R by an abelian group I is a pair (E, ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } ) consisting of a ring E and a ring homomorphism ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } that fits into the short exact sequence of abelian groups:

0 I E ϕ R 0. {\displaystyle 0\to I\to E{\overset {\phi }{{}\to {}}}R\to 0.}

This makes I isomorphic to a two-sided ideal of E.

Given a commutative ring A, an A-extension or an extension of an A-algebra is defined in the same way by replacing "ring" with "algebra over A" and "abelian groups" with "A-modules".

An extension is said to be trivial or to split if ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } splits; i.e., ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } admits a section that is a ring homomorphism (see § Example: trivial extension).

A morphism between extensions of R by I, over say A, is an algebra homomorphism EE' that induces the identities on I and R. By the five lemma, such a morphism is necessarily an isomorphism, and so two extensions are equivalent if there is a morphism between them.

Trivial extension example

Let R be a commutative ring and M an R-module. Let E = RM be the direct sum of abelian groups. Define the multiplication on E by

( a , x ) ( b , y ) = ( a b , a y + b x ) . {\displaystyle (a,x)\cdot (b,y)=(ab,ay+bx).}

Note that identifying (a, x) with a + εx where ε squares to zero and expanding out (a + εx)(b + εy) yields the above formula; in particular we see that E is a ring. It is sometimes called the algebra of dual numbers. Alternatively, E can be defined as Sym ( M ) / n 2 Sym n ( M ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Sym} (M)/\bigoplus _{n\geq 2}\operatorname {Sym} ^{n}(M)} where Sym ( M ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Sym} (M)} is the symmetric algebra of M. We then have the short exact sequence

0 M E p R 0 {\displaystyle 0\to M\to E{\overset {p}{{}\to {}}}R\to 0}

where p is the projection. Hence, E is an extension of R by M. It is trivial since r ( r , 0 ) {\displaystyle r\mapsto (r,0)} is a section (note this section is a ring homomorphism since ( 1 , 0 ) {\displaystyle (1,0)} is the multiplicative identity of E). Conversely, every trivial extension E of R by I is isomorphic to R I {\displaystyle R\oplus I} if I 2 = 0 {\displaystyle I^{2}=0} . Indeed, identifying R {\displaystyle R} as a subring of E using a section, we have ( E , ϕ ) ( R I , p ) {\displaystyle (E,\phi )\simeq (R\oplus I,p)} via e ( ϕ ( e ) , e ϕ ( e ) ) {\displaystyle e\mapsto (\phi (e),e-\phi (e))} .

One interesting feature of this construction is that the module M becomes an ideal of some new ring. In his book Local Rings, Nagata calls this process the principle of idealization.

Square-zero extension

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (March 2023)

Especially in deformation theory, it is common to consider an extension R of a ring (commutative or not) by an ideal whose square is zero. Such an extension is called a square-zero extension, a square extension or just an extension. For a square-zero ideal I, since I is contained in the left and right annihilators of itself, I is a R / I {\displaystyle R/I} -bimodule.

More generally, an extension by a nilpotent ideal is called a nilpotent extension. For example, the quotient R R r e d {\displaystyle R\to R_{\mathrm {red} }} of a Noetherian commutative ring by the nilradical is a nilpotent extension.

In general,

0 I n / I n 1 R / I n 1 R / I n 0 {\displaystyle 0\to I^{n}/I^{n-1}\to R/I^{n-1}\to R/I^{n}\to 0}

is a square-zero extension. Thus, a nilpotent extension breaks up into successive square-zero extensions. Because of this, it is usually enough to study square-zero extensions in order to understand nilpotent extensions.

See also

References

  1. ^ Sernesi 2007, 1.1.1.
  2. Typical references require sections be homomorphisms without elaborating whether 1 is preserved. But since we need to be able to identify R as a subring of E (see the trivial extension example), it seems 1 needs to be preserved.
  3. Anderson, D. D.; Winders, M. (March 2009). "Idealization of a Module". Journal of Commutative Algebra. 1 (1): 3–56. doi:10.1216/JCA-2009-1-1-3. ISSN 1939-2346. S2CID 120720674.
  4. Nagata, Masayoshi (1962), Local Rings, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13, New York-London: Interscience Publishers a division of John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-88275-228-6, MR 0155856

Further reading

Category: