Misplaced Pages

Immersed boundary method

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Immersed Boundary Method)
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (April 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In computational fluid dynamics, the immersed boundary method originally referred to an approach developed by Charles Peskin in 1972 to simulate fluid-structure (fiber) interactions. Treating the coupling of the structure deformations and the fluid flow poses a number of challenging problems for numerical simulations (the elastic boundary changes the flow of the fluid and the fluid moves the elastic boundary simultaneously). In the immersed boundary method the fluid is represented in an Eulerian coordinate system and the structure is represented in Lagrangian coordinates. For Newtonian fluids governed by the Navier–Stokes equations, the fluid equations are

ρ ( ∂ u ( x , t ) ∂ t + u ⋅ ∇ u ) = − ∇ p + μ Δ u ( x , t ) + f ( x , t ) {\displaystyle \rho \left({\frac {\partial {u}({x},t)}{\partial {t}}}+{u}\cdot \nabla {u}\right)=-\nabla p+\mu \,\Delta u(x,t)+f(x,t)}

and if the flow is incompressible, we have the further condition that

∇ ⋅ u = 0. {\displaystyle \nabla \cdot u=0.\,}

The immersed structures are typically represented as a collection of one-dimensional fibers, denoted by Γ {\displaystyle \Gamma } . Each fiber can be viewed as a parametric curve X ( s , t ) {\displaystyle X(s,t)} where s {\displaystyle s} is the Lagrangian coordinate along the fiber and t {\displaystyle t} is time. The physics of the fiber is represented via a fiber force distribution function F ( s , t ) {\displaystyle F(s,t)} . Spring forces, bending resistance or any other type of behavior can be built into this term. The force exerted by the structure on the fluid is then interpolated as a source term in the momentum equation using

f ( x , t ) = ∫ Γ F ( s , t ) δ ( x − X ( s , t ) ) d s , {\displaystyle f(x,t)=\int _{\Gamma }F(s,t)\,\delta {\big (}x-X(s,t){\big )}\,ds,}

where δ {\displaystyle \delta } is the Dirac δ function. The forcing can be extended to multiple dimensions to model elastic surfaces or three-dimensional solids. Assuming a massless structure, the elastic fiber moves with the local fluid velocity and can be interpolated via the delta function

∂ X ( s , t ) ∂ t = u ( X , t ) = ∫ Ω u ( x , t ) δ ( x − X ( s , t ) ) d x , {\displaystyle {\frac {\partial X(s,t)}{\partial t}}=u(X,t)=\int _{\Omega }u(x,t)\,\delta {\big (}x-X(s,t){\big )}\,dx,}

where Ω {\displaystyle \Omega } denotes the entire fluid domain. Discretization of these equations can be done by assuming an Eulerian grid on the fluid and a separate Lagrangian grid on the fiber. Approximations of the Delta distribution by smoother functions will allow us to interpolate between the two grids. Any existing fluid solver can be coupled to a solver for the fiber equations to solve the Immersed Boundary equations. Variants of this basic approach have been applied to simulate a wide variety of mechanical systems involving elastic structures which interact with fluid flows.

Since the original development of this method by Peskin, a variety of approaches have been developed. These include stochastic formulations for microscopic systems, viscoelastic soft materials, complex fluids, such as the Stochastic Immersed Boundary Methods of Atzberger, Kramer, and Peskin, methods for simulating flows over complicated immersed solid bodies on grids that do not conform to the surface of the body Mittal and Iaccarino, and other approaches that incorporate mass and rotational degrees of freedom Olson, Lim, Cortez. Methods for complicated body shapes include the immersed interface method, the Cartesian grid method, the ghost fluid method and the cut-cell methods categorizing immersed boundary methods into continuous forcing and discrete forcing methods. Methods have been developed for simulations of viscoelastic fluids, curved fluid interfaces, microscopic biophysical systems (proteins in lipid bilayer membranes, swimmers), and engineered devices, such as the Stochastic Immersed Boundary Methods of Atzberger, Kramer, and Peskin, Stochastic Eulerian Lagrangian Methods of Atzberger, Massed Immersed Boundary Methods of Mori, and Rotational Immersed Boundary Methods of Olson, Lim, Cortez.

In general, for immersed boundary methods and related variants, there is an active research community that is still developing new techniques and related software implementations and incorporating related techniques into simulation packages and CAD engineering software. For more details see below.

See also

Software: Numerical codes

Notes

  1. Peskin, Charles S (1972-10-01). "Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method". Journal of Computational Physics. 10 (2): 252–271. Bibcode:1972JCoPh..10..252P. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(72)90065-4. ISSN 0021-9991.
  2. Atzberger, Paul J. (2011). "Stochastic Eulerian Lagrangian Methods for Fluid Structure Interactions with Thermal Fluctuations". Journal of Computational Physics. 230 (8): 2821–2837. arXiv:1009.5648. Bibcode:2011JCoPh.230.2821A. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.028. S2CID 6067032.
  3. Atzberger, Paul (2013), "Incorporating Shear into Stochastic Eulerian Lagrangian Methods for Rheological Studies of Complex Fluids and Soft Materials", Physica D, 265: 57–70, arXiv:2212.10651, doi:10.1016/j.physd.2013.09.002
  4. Mittal & Iaccarino 2005.
  5. Olson, S.; Lim, S.; Cortez, R. (2013). "Modeling the dynamics of an elastic rod with intrinsic curvature and twist using a regularized Stokes formulation". Journal of Computational Physics. 238. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2012.12.026.
  6. Atzberger, Paul J. (2011). "Stochastic Eulerian Lagrangian Methods for Fluid Structure Interactions with Thermal Fluctuations". Journal of Computational Physics. 230 (8): 2821–2837. arXiv:1009.5648. Bibcode:2011JCoPh.230.2821A. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.028. S2CID 6067032.
  7. Rower, David A.; Padidar, Misha; Atzberger, Paul J. (April 2022). "Surface fluctuating hydrodynamics methods for the drift-diffusion dynamics of particles and microstructures within curved fluid interfaces". Journal of Computational Physics. 455: 110994. arXiv:1906.01146. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.110994.
  8. Atzberger, Paul J. (2011). "Stochastic Eulerian Lagrangian Methods for Fluid Structure Interactions with Thermal Fluctuations". Journal of Computational Physics. 230 (8): 2821–2837. arXiv:1009.5648. Bibcode:2011JCoPh.230.2821A. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.028. S2CID 6067032.
  9. Atzberger, Paul (2013), "Incorporating Shear into Stochastic Eulerian Lagrangian Methods for Rheological Studies of Complex Fluids and Soft Materials", Physica D, 265: 57–70, arXiv:2212.10651, doi:10.1016/j.physd.2013.09.002
  10. Atzberger, Paul (2016). "Hydrodynamic Coupling of Particle Inclusions Embedded in Curved Lipid Bilayer Membranes". Soft Matter. 12: 6685–6707. arXiv:1601.06461. doi:10.1039/C6SM00194G.
  11. Mori, Yoichiro; Peskin, Charles S. (2008). "Implicit Second-Order Immersed Boundary Methods with Boundary Mass". Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 197 (25–28): 2049–2067. Bibcode:2008CMAME.197.2049M. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2007.05.028.
  12. Olson, S.; Lim, S.; Cortez, R. (2013). "Modeling the dynamics of an elastic rod with intrinsic curvature and twist using a regularized Stokes formulation". Journal of Computational Physics. 238. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2012.12.026.

References

Numerical methods for partial differential equations
Finite difference
Parabolic
Hyperbolic
Others
Finite volume
Finite element
Meshless/Meshfree
Domain decomposition
Others
Categories: