Misplaced Pages

"Fourth Industrial Revolution", "4IR", or "Industry 4.0", is a neologism describing rapid technological advancement in the 21st century. It follows the Third Industrial Revolution (the "Information Age"). The term was popularised in 2016 by Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum founder and executive chairman, who asserts that these developments represent a significant shift in industrial capitalism.

A part of this phase of industrial change is the joining of technologies like artificial intelligence, gene editing, to advanced robotics that blur the lines between the physical, digital, and biological worlds.

Throughout this, fundamental shifts are taking place in how the global production and supply network operates through ongoing automation of traditional manufacturing and industrial practices, using modern smart technology, large-scale machine-to-machine communication (M2M), and the Internet of things (IoT). This integration results in increasing automation, improving communication and self-monitoring, and the use of smart machines that can analyse and diagnose issues without the need for human intervention.

It also represents a social, political, and economic shift from the digital age of the late 1990s and early 2000s to an era of embedded connectivity distinguished by the ubiquity of technology in society (i.e. a metaverse) that changes the ways humans experience and know the world around them. It posits that we have created and are entering an augmented social reality compared to just the natural senses and industrial ability of humans alone. The Fourth Industrial Revolution is sometimes expected to mark the beginning of an imagination age, where creativity and imagination become the primary drivers of economic value.

History

The phrase Fourth Industrial Revolution was first introduced by a team of scientists developing a high-tech strategy for the German government. Klaus Schwab, executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), introduced the phrase to a wider audience in a 2015 article published by Foreign Affairs. "Mastering the Fourth Industrial Revolution" was the 2016 theme of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland.

On 10 October 2016, the Forum announced the opening of its Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution in San Francisco. This was also subject and title of Schwab's 2016 book. Schwab includes in this fourth era technologies that combine hardware, software, and biology (cyber-physical systems), and emphasises advances in communication and connectivity. Schwab expects this era to be marked by breakthroughs in emerging technologies in fields such as robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, quantum computing, biotechnology, the internet of things, the industrial internet of things, decentralised consensus, fifth-generation wireless technologies, 3D printing, and fully autonomous vehicles.

In The Great Reset proposal by the WEF, The Fourth Industrial Revolution is included as a strategic intelligence in the solution to rebuild the economy sustainably following the COVID-19 pandemic.

First Industrial Revolution

The First Industrial Revolution was marked by a transition from hand production methods to machines through the use of steam power and water power. The implementation of new technologies took a long time, so the period which this refers to was between 1760 and 1820, or 1840 in Europe and the United States. Its effects had consequences on textile manufacturing, which was first to adopt such changes, as well as iron industry, agriculture, and mining although it also had societal effects with an ever stronger middle class.

Second Industrial Revolution

The Second Industrial Revolution, also known as the Technological Revolution, is the period between 1871 and 1914 that resulted from installations of extensive railroad and telegraph networks, which allowed for faster transfer of people and ideas, as well as electricity. Increasing electrification allowed for factories to develop the modern production line.

Third Industrial Revolution

The Third Industrial Revolution, also known as the Digital Revolution, began in the late 20th century. It is characterized by the shift to an economy centered on information technology, marked by the advent of personal computers, the Internet, and the widespread digitalization of communication and industrial processes.

A book titled The Third Industrial Revolution, by Jeremy Rifkin, was published in 2011, which focused on the intersection of digital communications technology and renewable energy. It was made into a 2017 documentary by Vice Media.

Characteristics

In essence, the Fourth Industrial Revolution is the trend towards automation and data exchange in manufacturing technologies and processes which include cyber-physical systems (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing, cognitive computing, and artificial intelligence.

Machines improve human efficiency in performing repetitive functions, and the combination of machine learning and computing power allows machines to carry out increasingly complex tasks.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution has been defined as technological developments in cyber-physical systems such as high capacity connectivity; new human-machine interaction modes such as touch interfaces and virtual reality systems; and improvements in transferring digital instructions to the physical world including robotics and 3D printing (additive manufacturing); "big data" and cloud computing; improvements to and uptake of Off-Grid / Stand-Alone Renewable Energy Systems: solar, wind, wave, hydroelectric and the electric batteries (lithium-ion renewable energy storage systems (ESS) and EV).

It also emphasizes decentralized decisions – the ability of cyber physical systems to make decisions on their own and to perform their tasks as autonomously as possible. Only in the case of exceptions, interference, or conflicting goals, are tasks delegated to a higher level.

Distinctiveness

Proponents of the Fourth Industrial Revolution suggest it is a distinct revolution rather than simply a prolongation of the Third Industrial Revolution. This is due to the following characteristics:

• Velocity — exponential speed at which incumbent industries are affected and displaced
• Scope and systems impact – the large amount of sectors and firms that are affected
• Paradigm shift in technology policy – new policies designed for this new way of doing are present. An example is Singapore's formal recognition of Industry 4.0 in its innovation policies.

Critics of the concept dismiss Industry 4.0 as a marketing strategy. They suggest that although revolutionary changes are identifiable in distinct sectors, there is no systemic change so far. In addition, the pace of recognition of Industry 4.0 and policy transition varies across countries; the definition of Industry 4.0 is not harmonised. One of the most known figures is Jeremy Rifkin who "agree that digitalization is the hallmark and defining technology in what has become known as the Third Industrial Revolution". However, he argues "that the evolution of digitalization has barely begun to run its course and that its new configuration in the form of the Internet of Things represents the next stage of its development".

Components

The application of the Fourth Industrial Revolution operates through:

• Mobile devices
• Location detection technologies (electronic identification)
• Advanced human-machine interfaces
• Authentication and fraud detection
• Smart sensors
• Big analytics and advanced processes
• Multilevel customer interaction and customer profiling
• Augmented reality/wearables
• On-demand availability of computer system resources
• Data visualisation

Industry 4.0 networks a wide range of new technologies to create value. Using cyber-physical systems that monitor physical processes, a virtual copy of the physical world can be designed. Characteristics of cyber-physical systems include the ability to make decentralised decisions independently, reaching a high degree of autonomy.

The value created in Industry 4.0, can be relied upon electronic identification, in which the smart manufacturing require set technologies to be incorporated in the manufacturing process to thus be classified as in the development path of Industry 4.0 and no longer digitisation.

Trends

Smart factory

The Fourth Industrial Revolution fosters "smart factories", which are production environment where facilities and logistics systems are organised with minimal human intervention.

The technical foundations on which smart factories are based are cyber-physical systems that communicate with each other using the Internet of Things and Services. An important part of this process is the exchange of data between the product and the production line. This enables a much more efficient connection of the Supply Chain and better organisation within any production environment.

Within modular structured smart factories, cyber-physical systems monitor physical processes, create a virtual copy of the physical world and make decentralised decisions. Over the internet of things, cyber-physical systems communicate and cooperate with each other and with humans in synchronic time both internally and across organizational services offered and used by participants of the value chain.

Artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) has a wide range of applications across all sectors of the economy. It gained prominence following advancements in deep learning during the 2010s, and its impact intensified in the 2020s with the rise of generative AI, a period often referred to as the "AI boom". Models like GPT-4o can engage in verbal and textual discussions and analyze images.

AI is a key driver of Industry 4.0, orchestrating technologies like robotics, automated vehicles, and real-time data analytics. By enabling machines to perform complex tasks, AI is redefining production processes and reducing changeover times. AI could also significantly accelerate, or even automate software development.

Some experts believe that AI alone could be as transformative as an industrial revolution. Multiple companies such as OpenAI and Meta have expressed the goal of creating artificial general intelligence (AI that can do virtually any cognitive task a human can), making large investments in data centers and GPUs to train more capable AI models.

Robotics

Humanoid robots have traditionally lacked usefulness. They had difficulty picking simple objects due to imprecise control and coordination, and they wouldn't understand their environment and how physics works. They were often explicitly programmed to do narrow tasks, failing when encountering new situations. Modern humanoid robots however are typically based on machine learning, in particular reinforcement learning. In 2024, humanoid robots are rapidly becoming more flexible, easier to train and versatile.

Predictive maintenance

Industry 4.0 facilitates predictive maintenance, due to the use of advanced technologies, including IoT sensors. Predictive maintenance, which can identify potential maintenance issues in real time, allows machine owners to perform cost-effective maintenance before the machinery fails or gets damaged. For example, a company in Los Angeles could understand if a piece of equipment in Singapore is running at an abnormal speed or temperature. They could then decide whether or not it needs to be repaired.

3D printing

The Fourth Industrial Revolution is said to have extensive dependency on 3D printing technology. Some advantages of 3D printing for industry are that 3D printing can print many geometric structures, as well as simplify the product design process. It is also relatively environmentally friendly. In low-volume production, it can also decrease lead times and total production costs. Moreover, it can increase flexibility, reduce warehousing costs and help the company towards the adoption of a mass customisation business strategy. In addition, 3D printing can be very useful for printing spare parts and installing it locally, therefore reducing supplier dependence and reducing the supply lead time.

Smart sensors

Sensors and instrumentation drive the central forces of innovation, not only for Industry 4.0 but also for other "smart" megatrends, such as smart production, smart mobility, smart homes, smart cities, and smart factories.

Smart sensors are devices, which generate the data and allow further functionality from self-monitoring and self-configuration to condition monitoring of complex processes. With the capability of wireless communication, they reduce installation effort to a great extent and help realise a dense array of sensors.

The importance of sensors, measurement science, and smart evaluation for Industry 4.0 has been recognised and acknowledged by various experts and has already led to the statement "Industry 4.0: nothing goes without sensor systems."

However, there are a few issues, such as time synchronisation error, data loss, and dealing with large amounts of harvested data, which all limit the implementation of full-fledged systems. Moreover, additional limits on these functionalities represents the battery power. One example of the integration of smart sensors in the electronic devices, is the case of smart watches, where sensors receive the data from the movement of the user, process the data and as a result, provide the user with the information about how many steps they have walked in a day and also converts the data into calories burned.

Agriculture and food industries

Smart sensors in these two fields are still in the testing stage. These innovative connected sensors collect, interpret and communicate the information available in the plots (leaf area, vegetation index, chlorophyll, hygrometry, temperature, water potential, radiation). Based on this scientific data, the objective is to enable real-time monitoring via a smartphone with a range of advice that optimises plot management in terms of results, time and costs. On the farm, these sensors can be used to detect crop stages and recommend inputs and treatments at the right time. As well as controlling the level of irrigation.

The food industry requires more and more security and transparency and full documentation is required. This new technology is used as a tracking system as well as the collection of human data and product data.

Accelerated transition to the knowledge economy

Knowledge economy is an economic system in which production and services are largely based on knowledge-intensive activities that contribute to an accelerated pace of technical and scientific advance, as well as rapid obsolescence. Industry 4.0 aids transitions into knowledge economy by increasing reliance on intellectual capabilities than on physical inputs or natural resources.

Challenges

Challenges in implementation of Industry 4.0:

Economic

• High economic cost
• Business model adaptation
• Unclear economic benefits/excessive investment
• Driving significant economic changes through automation and technological advancements, leading to both job displacement and the creation of new roles, necessitating widespread workforce reskilling and systemic adaptation.

Social

• Privacy concerns
• Surveillance and distrust
• General reluctance to change by stakeholders
• Threat of redundancy of the corporate IT department
• Loss of many jobs to automatic processes and IT-controlled processes, especially for blue-collar workers
• Increased risk of gender inequalities in professions with job roles most susceptible to replacement with AI

Political

• Lack of regulation, standards and forms of certifications
• Unclear legal issues and data security

Organizational

• IT security issues, which are greatly aggravated by the inherent need to open up previously closed production shops
• Reliability and stability needed for critical machine-to-machine communication (M2M), including very short and stable latency times
• Need to maintain the integrity of production processes
• Need to avoid any IT snags, as those would cause expensive production outages
• Need to protect industrial know-how (contained also in the control files for the industrial automation gear)
• Lack of adequate skill-sets to expedite the transition towards Industry 4.0
• Low top management commitment
• Insufficient qualification of employees

Country applications

Many countries have set up institutional mechanisms to foster the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies. For example,

Australia

Australia has a Digital Transformation Agency (est. 2015) and the Prime Minister's Industry 4.0 Taskforce (est. 2016), which promotes collaboration with industry groups in Germany and the USA.

Germany

The term "Industrie 4.0", shortened to I4.0 or simply I4, originated in 2011 from a project in the high-tech strategy of the German government and specifically relates to that project policy, rather than a wider notion of a Fourth Industrial Revolution of 4IR, which promotes the computerisation of manufacturing. The term "Industrie 4.0" was publicly introduced in the same year at the Hannover Fair. Renowned German professor Wolfgang Wahlster is sometimes called the inventor of the "Industry 4.0" term. In October 2012, the Working Group on Industry 4.0 presented a set of Industry 4.0 implementation recommendations to the German federal government. The workgroup members and partners are recognised as the founding fathers and driving force behind Industry 4.0. On 8 April 2013 at the Hannover Fair, the final report of the Working Group Industry 4.0 was presented. This working group was headed by Siegfried Dais, of Robert Bosch GmbH, and Henning Kagermann, of the German Academy of Science and Engineering.

As Industry 4.0 principles have been applied by companies, they have sometimes been rebranded. For example, the aerospace parts manufacturer Meggitt PLC has branded its own Industry 4.0 research project M4.

The discussion of how the shift to Industry 4.0, especially digitisation, will affect the labour market is being discussed in Germany under the topic of Work 4.0.

The federal government in Germany through its ministries of the BMBF and BMWi, is a leader in the development of the I4.0 policy. Through the publishing of set objectives and goals for enterprises to achieve, the German federal government attempts to set the direction of the digital transformation. However, there is a gap between German enterprise's collaboration and knowledge of these set policies. The biggest challenge which SMEs in Germany are currently facing regarding digital transformation of their manufacturing processes is ensuring that there is a concrete IT and application landscape to support further digital transformation efforts.

The characteristics of the German government's Industry 4.0 strategy involve the strong customisation of products under the conditions of highly flexible (mass-) production. The required automation technology is improved by the introduction of methods of self-optimization, self-configuration, self-diagnosis, cognition and intelligent support of workers in their increasingly complex work. The largest project in Industry 4.0 as of July 2013 is the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) leading-edge cluster "Intelligent Technical Systems Ostwestfalen-Lippe (its OWL)". Another major project is the BMBF project RES-COM, as well as the Cluster of Excellence "Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries". In 2015, the European Commission started the international Horizon 2020 research project CREMA (cloud-based rapid elastic manufacturing) as a major initiative to foster the Industry 4.0 topic.

Estonia

In Estonia, the digital transformation dubbed as the 4th Industrial Revolution by Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum in 2015 started with the restoration of independence in 1991. Although a latecomer to the information revolution due to 50 years of Soviet occupation, Estonia leapfrogged to the digital era, while skipping the analogue connections almost completely. The early decisions made by Prime Minister Mart Laar on the course of the country's economic development led to the establishment of what is today known as e-Estonia, one of the worlds most digitally advanced nations.

According to the goals set in the Estonia's Digital Agenda 2030, next leaps in the country's digital transformation will be switching to event based and proactive services, both in private and business environment, as well as developing a green, AI-powered and human-centric digital government.

Indonesia

Another example is Making Indonesia 4.0, with a focus on improving industrial performance.

India

India, with its expanding economy and extensive manufacturing sector, has embraced the digital revolution, leading to significant advancements in manufacturing. The Indian program for Industry 4.0 centers around leveraging technology to produce globally competitive products at cost-effective rates while adopting the latest technological advancements of Industry 4.0.

Japan

Society 5.0 envisions a society that prioritizes the well-being of its citizens, striking a harmonious balance between economic progress and the effective addressing of societal challenges through a closely interconnected system of both the digital realm and the physical world. This concept was introduced in 2019 in the 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan for Japanese Government as a blueprint for a forthcoming societal framework.

Malaysia

Malaysia's national policy on Industry 4.0 is known as Industry4WRD. Launched in 2018, key initiatives in this policy include enhancing digital infrastructure, equipping the workforce with 4IR skills, and fostering innovation and technology adoption across industries.

South Africa

South Africa appointed a Presidential Commission on the Fourth Industrial Revolution in 2019, consisting of about 30 stakeholders with a background in academia, industry and government. South Africa has also established an Inter ministerial Committee on Industry 4.0.

South Korea

The Republic of Korea has had a Presidential Committee on the Fourth Industrial Revolution since 2017. The Republic of Korea's I-Korea strategy (2017) is focusing on new growth engines that include AI, drones and autonomous cars, in line with the government's innovation-driven economic policy.

Uganda

Uganda adopted its own National 4IR Strategy in October 2020 with emphasis on e-governance, urban management (smart cities), health care, education, agriculture and the digital economy; to support local businesses, the government was contemplating introducing a local start-ups bill in 2020 which would require all accounting officers to exhaust the local market prior to procuring digital solutions from abroad.

United Kingdom

In a policy paper published in 2019, the UK's Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, titled "Regulation for the Fourth Industrial Revolution", outlined the need to evolve current regulatory models to remain competitive in evolving technological and social settings.

United States

The Department of Homeland Security in 2019 published a paper called 'The Industrial Internet of things (IIOT): Opportunities, Risks, Mitigation'. The base pieces of critical infrastructure are increasingly digitised for greater connectivity and optimisation. Hence, its implementation, growth and maintenance must be carefully planned and safeguarded. The paper discusses not only applications of IIOT but also the associated risks. It has suggested some key areas where risk mitigation is possible. To increase coordination between the public, private, law enforcement, academia and other stakeholders the DHS formed the National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC).

Industry applications

The aerospace industry has sometimes been characterised as "too low volume for extensive automation". However, Industry 4.0 principles have been investigated by several aerospace companies, and technologies have been developed to improve productivity where the upfront cost of automation cannot be justified. One example of this is the aerospace parts manufacturer Meggitt PLC's M4 project.

The increasing use of the industrial internet of things is referred to as Industry 4.0 at Bosch, and generally in Germany. Applications include machines that can predict failures and trigger maintenance processes autonomously or self-organised coordination that react to unexpected changes in production. in 2017, Bosch launched the Connectory, a Chicago, Illinois based innovation incubator that specializes in IoT, including Industry 4.0.

Industry 4.0 inspired Innovation 4.0, a move toward digitisation for academia and research and development. In 2017, the £81M Materials Innovation Factory (MIF) at the University of Liverpool opened as a center for computer aided materials science, where robotic formulation, data capture and modelling are being integrated into development practices.

Criticism

With the consistent development of automation of everyday tasks, some saw the benefit in the exact opposite of automation where self-made products are valued more than those that involved automation. This valuation is named the IKEA effect, a term coined by Michael I. Norton of Harvard Business School, Daniel Mochon of Yale, and Dan Ariely of Duke. Another problem that is expected to accelerate with the growth of IR4 is the prevalence of mental disorders, a known issue within high-tech operators. Also, the IR4 has sparked significant criticism regarding AI bias and ethical issues, as algorithms used in decision-making processes often perpetuate existing social inequalities, disproportionately impacting marginalized groups while lacking transparency and accountability.

Future

Industry 5.0

Industry 5.0 has been proposed as a strategy to create a paradigm shift for an industrial landscape in which the primary focus should no longer be on increasing efficiency but on promoting the well-being of society and sustainability of the economy and industrial production.

See also

• Computer-integrated manufacturing
• Cyber manufacturing
• Digital modelling and fabrication
• Industrial control system
• Intelligent maintenance systems
• Lights-out manufacturing
• List of emerging technologies
• Machine to machine
• Nondestructive Evaluation 4.0
• Simulation software
• Technological singularity
• Technological unemployment
• The War on Normal People
• Work 4.0
• World Economic Forum 2016
• Digitization
• Transhumanism
• AI boom

References

1. Bai, Chunguang; Dallasega, Patrick; Orzes, Guido; Sarkis, Joseph (1 November 2020). "Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective". International Journal of Production Economics. 229: 107776. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776. ISSN 0925-5273. S2CID 218941878.
2. Ross, Philip; Maynard, Kasia (2021). "Towards a 4th industrial revolution". Intelligent Buildings International. 13 (3): 159–161. doi:10.1080/17508975.2021.1873625.
3. McGinnis, Devon (27 October 2020). "What Is the Fourth Industrial Revolution?". The 360 Blog from Salesforce. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
4. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution will be people powered | McKinsey". www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
5. Signé, Njuguna Ndung'u and Landry (8 January 2020). "The Fourth Industrial Revolution and digitization will transform Africa into a global powerhouse". Brookings. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
6. Marr, Bernard. "Why Everyone Must Get Ready For The 4th Industrial Revolution". Forbes. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
7. Park, Hyeoun-Ae (10 November 2016). "Are We Ready for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?". Yearbook of Medical Informatics (1): 1–3. PMC 5171547. PMID 27830223.
8. ^ Philbeck, Thomas; Davis, Nicholas (2018). "The Fourth Industrial Revolution". Journal of International Affairs. 72 (1): 17–22. ISSN 0022-197X. JSTOR 26588339.
9. ^ "Regulation for the Fourth Industrial Revolution". UK Gov Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. 11 June 2019. Retrieved 18 November 2021.
10. November 2019, Mike Moore 05 (5 November 2019). "What is Industry 4.0? Everything you need to know". TechRadar. Retrieved 27 May 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
11. Lee, MinHwa; Yun, JinHyo; Pyka, Andreas; Won, DongKyu; Kodama, Fumio; Schiuma, Giovanni; Park, HangSik; Jeon, Jeonghwan; Park, KyungBae; Jung, KwangHo; Yan, Min-Ren (21 June 2018). "How to Respond to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the Second Information Technology Revolution? Dynamic New Combinations between Technology, Market, and Society through Open Innovation". Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 4 (3): 21. doi:10.3390/joitmc4030021. hdl:11563/139044. ISSN 2199-8531.
12. Recke, Martin (June 2019). "Why imagination and creativity are primary value creators". SinnerSchrader Aktiengesellschaft.
13. "Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industrial Revolution - vdi-nachrichten.com". 4 March 2013. Archived from the original on 4 March 2013. Retrieved 25 January 2021.
14. ^ Schwab, Klaus (12 December 2015). "The Fourth Industrial Revolution". Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 15 January 2019.
15. Marr, Bernard. "Why Everyone Must Get Ready For The 4th Industrial Revolution". Forbes. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
16. Monck, Adrian (10 October 2016). "New Forum Center to Advance Global Cooperation on Fourth Industrial Revolution". World Economic Forum. Archived from the original on 20 November 2016. Retrieved 15 October 2018.
17. Schwab, Klaus (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Publishing Group (published 2017). ISBN 9781524758875. Retrieved 29 June 2017. Digital technologies ... are not new, but in a break with the third industrial revolution, they are becoming more sophisticated and integrated and are, as a result, transforming societies and the global economy.
18. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means and how to respond". World Economic Forum. 14 January 2016. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
19. Schwab, Klaus (14 January 2016). "The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 29 June 2017. The possibilities of billions of people connected by mobile devices, with unprecedented processing power, storage capacity, and access to knowledge, are unlimited. And these possibilities will be multiplied by emerging technology breakthroughs in fields such as artificial intelligence, robotics, the Internet of Things, autonomous vehicles, 3-D printing, nanotechnology, biotechnology, materials science, energy storage, and quantum computing.
20. "Strategic Intelligence – World Economic Forum". Archived from the original on 22 December 2020.
21. R. Berlanstein, Lenard (1992). "The Industrial Revolution and Work in Nineteenth-Century Europe". p. xiv. Archived from the original on 29 January 2020. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
22. "History of Electricity".
23. Rifkin, Jeremy (2013). The third industrial revolution: how lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-34197-5.
24. The Third Industrial Revolution: A Radical New Sharing Economy. VICE. 13 February 2018.
25. "IIOT AND AUTOMATION".
26. ^ Hermann, Mario; Pentek, Tobias; Otto, Boris (2016). "Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios". 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). pp. 3928–3937. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2016.488. ISBN 978-0-7695-5670-3. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
27. Jürgen Jasperneite:Was hinter Begriffen wie Industrie 4.0 steckt Archived 1 April 2013 at the Wayback Machine in Computer & Automation, 19 December 2012 accessed on 23 December 2012
28. Kagermann, H., W. Wahlster and J. Helbig, eds., 2013: Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0: Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group
29. ^ Heiner Lasi, Hans-Georg Kemper, Peter Fettke, Thomas Feld, Michael Hoffmann: Industry 4.0. In: Business & Information Systems Engineering 4 (6), pp. 239–242
30. Gazzaneo, Lucia; Padovano, Antonio; Umbrello, Steven (1 January 2020). "Designing Smart Operator 4.0 for Human Values: A Value Sensitive Design Approach". Procedia Manufacturing. International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing (ISM 2019). 42: 219–226. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.073. hdl:2318/1735962. ISSN 2351-9789.
31. Pedota, Mattia; Piscitello, Lucia (3 November 2021). "A new perspective on technology-driven creativity enhancement in the Fourth Industrial Revolution". Creativity and Innovation Management. 31 (1): 109–122. doi:10.1111/caim.12468. hdl:11311/1208221. ISSN 0963-1690. S2CID 243788231.
32. Gronau, Norbert; Grum, Marcus; Bender, Benedict (2016). "Determining the optimal level of autonomy in cyber-physical production systems". 2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). pp. 1293–1299. doi:10.1109/INDIN.2016.7819367. ISBN 978-1-5090-2870-2. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
33. ^ Rifkin, Jeremy (15 January 2016). "The 2016 World Economic Forum Misfires with its Fourth Industrial Revolution Theme". IndustryWeek.
34. ^ "How To Define Industry 4.0: Main Pillars Of Industry 4.0". ResearchGate. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
35. "Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index – Managing the Digital Transformation of Companies". acatech – National Academy of Science and Engineering. Retrieved 21 December 2020.
36. Chen, Baotong; Wan, Jiafu; Shu, Lei; Li, Peng; Mukherjee, Mithun; Yin, Boxing (2018). "Smart Factory of Industry 4.0: Key Technologies, Application Case, and Challenges". IEEE Access. 6: 6505–6519. Bibcode:2018IEEEA...6.6505C. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2783682. ISSN 2169-3536. S2CID 3809961.
37. Padovano, Antonio; Longo, Francesco; Nicoletti, Letizia; Mirabelli, Giovanni (1 January 2018). "A Digital Twin based Service Oriented Application for a 4.0 Knowledge Navigation in the Smart Factory". IFAC-PapersOnLine. 16th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2018. 51 (11): 631–636. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.389. ISSN 2405-8963.
38. Simonite, Tom. "Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Artificial Intelligence". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 7 September 2024.
39. Colburn, Thomas. "OpenAI unveils GPT-4o, a fresh multimodal AI flagship model". The Register. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
40. "Adopting AI in manufacturing at speed and scale". McKinsey. 21 February 2024.
41. Mittal, Aayush (14 November 2023). "Will Large Language Models End Programming?". Unite.AI. Retrieved 7 September 2024.
42. "In Leaked Audio, Amazon Cloud CEO Says AI Will Soon Make Human Programmers a Thing of the Past". Futurism. 22 August 2024. Retrieved 7 September 2024.
43. Devlin, Hannah (3 May 2023). "AI 'could be as transformative as Industrial Revolution'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 7 September 2024.
44. "Tech companies want to build artificial general intelligence. But who decides when AGI is attained?". AP News. 4 April 2024. Retrieved 7 September 2024.
45. Heath, Alex (18 January 2024). "Mark Zuckerberg's new goal is creating artificial general intelligence". The Verge. Retrieved 7 September 2024.
46. "Microsoft, OpenAI plan $100 billion data-center project, media report says". Reuters. 29 March 2024.
47. "Is robotics about to have its own ChatGPT moment?". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 7 September 2024.
48. "Are You Ready For The Fourth Industrial Revolution?". The One Brief. 4 May 2017. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
49. Yin, Yong; Stecke, Kathryn E.; Li, Dongni (17 January 2018). "The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0". International Journal of Production Research. 56 (1–2): 848–861. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1403664. ISSN 0020-7543.
50. Imkamp, D., Berthold, J., Heizmann, M., Kniel, K., Manske, E., Peterek, M., Schmitt, R., Seidler, J., and Sommer, K.-D.: Challenges and trends in manufacturing measurement technology – the "Industrie 4.0" concept, J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 5, 325–335, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-5-325-2016, 2016
51. A.A. Kolomenskii, P.D. Gershon, H.A. Schuessler, Sensitivity and detection limit of concentration and adsorption measurements by laser-induced surface-plasmon resonance, Appl. Opt. 36 (1997) 6539–6547
52. Arnold, H.: Kommentar Industrie 4.0: Ohne Sensorsysteme geht nichts, available at: http://www.elektroniknet.de/messen-testen/ sonstiges/artikel/110776/ (last access: 10 March 2018), 2014
53. Ray, Partha Pratim (1 January 2017). "Internet of things for smart agriculture: Technologies, practices and future direction". Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments. 9 (4): 395–420. doi:10.3233/AIS-170440. ISSN 1876-1364.
54. Ferreira, Diogo; Corista, Pedro; Gião, João; Ghimire, Sudeep; Sarraipa, João; Jardim-Gonçalves, Ricardo (June 2017). "Towards smart agriculture using FIWARE enablers". 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC). pp. 1544–1551. doi:10.1109/ICE.2017.8280066. ISBN 978-1-5386-0774-9. S2CID 3433104.
55. Otles, Semih; Sakalli, Aysegul (1 January 2019), Grumezescu, Alexandru Mihai; Holban, Alina Maria (eds.), "15 – Industry 4.0: The Smart Factory of the Future in Beverage Industry", Production and Management of Beverages, Woodhead Publishing, pp. 439–469, ISBN 978-0-12-815260-7, retrieved 26 September 2020
56. Schwok, Karen (2 December 2020). "A "new" tech revolution is coming and the winds of change will hit the U.S. first". CTECH - www.calcalistech.com. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
57. Powell, W. W.; Snellman, K. (2004). "The knowledge economy". Annu. Rev. Sociol. 199–220 (30): 199–220. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037. S2CID 56043796.
58. ^ "BIBB : Industrie 4.0 und die Folgen für Arbeitsmarkt und Wirtschaft" (PDF). Doku.iab.de (in German). August 2015. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
59. ^ Birkel, Hendrik Sebastian; Hartmann, Evi (2019). "Impact of IoT challenges and risks for SCM". Supply Chain Management. 24: 39–61. doi:10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0142. S2CID 169819946.
60. Rotatori, Denise; Lee, Eun Jeong; Sleeva, Sheryl (1 January 2021). "The evolution of the workforce during the fourth industrial revolution". Human Resource Development International. 24 (1): 92–103. doi:10.1080/13678868.2020.1767453. ISSN 1367-8868.
61. Longo, Francesco; Padovano, Antonio; Umbrello, Steven (January 2020). "Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future". Applied Sciences. 10 (12): 4182. doi:10.3390/app10124182. hdl:2318/1741791.
62. Alderman, J (1 June 2021). "Women in the smart machine age: Addressing emerging risks of an increased gender gap in the accounting profession". Journal of Accounting Education. 55: 100715. doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100715. ISSN 0748-5751. S2CID 233583489.
63. UNESCO (25 February 2021). "Women a minority in Industry 4.0 fields". UNESCO. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
64. Spöttl, Georg; Windelband, Lars (2021). "The 4th industrial revolution – its impact on vocational skills". Journal of Education and Work. 34 (1): 29–52. doi:10.1080/13639080.2020.1858230.
65. Gumbo, Sibukele; Twinomurinzi, Hossana; Bwalya, Kelvin; Wamba, Samuel Fosso (2023). "Skills provisioning for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Bibliometric Analysis". Procedia Computer Science. 219: 924–932. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.368.
66. ^ Scott-Kemmis (11 June 2021). Schneegans; Straza; Lewis (eds.). Southeast Asia and Oceania. In UNESCO Science Report: the Race Against Time for Smarter Development. Paris: UNESCO. pp. 674–715. ISBN 978-92-3-100450-6.
67. BMBF-Internetredaktion (21 January 2016). "Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0 – BMBF". Bmbf.de. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
68. "Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution". Vdi-nachrichten.com (in German). 1 April 2011. Archived from the original on 4 March 2013. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
69. Szajna, Andrzej; Stryjski, Roman; Wozniak, Waldemar; Chamier-Gliszczynski, Norbert; Kostrzewski, Mariusz (22 August 2020). "Assessment of Augmented Reality in Manual Wiring Production Process with Use of Mobile AR Glasses". Sensors. 20 (17). MDPI: 4755. Bibcode:2020Senso..20.4755S. doi:10.3390/s20174755. PMC 7506974. PMID 32842693.
70. Industrie 4.0 Plattform Last download on 15. Juli 2013
71. ^ "Time to join the digital dots". 22 June 2018. Retrieved 25 July 2018.
72. Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of Germany (2015). Re-Imagining Work: White Paper Work 4.0.
73. ^ Keller, Matthias (2021). "I4.0 Strategy and Policy Integration in The German Machining Industry". KU Leuven.
74. "This Is Not the Fourth Industrial Revolution". Slate. 29 January 2016.
75. Selbstkonfiguierende Automation für Intelligente Technische Systeme, Video, last download on 27. Dezember 2012
76. Jürgen Jasperneite; Oliver, Niggemann: Intelligente Assistenzsysteme zur Beherrschung der Systemkomplexität in der Automation. In: ATP edition – Automatisierungstechnische Praxis, 9/2012, Oldenbourg Verlag, München, September 2012
77. "Herzlich willkommen auf den Internetseiten des Projekts RES-COM – RES-COM Webseite". Res-com-projekt.de. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
78. "RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY Cluster of Excellence "Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries" – English". Production-research.de. 19 October 2016. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
79. "H2020 CREMA – Cloud-based Rapid Elastic Manufacturing". Crema-project.eu. 21 November 2016. Archived from the original on 23 November 2016. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
80. "Digiühiskonna arengukava 2030 | Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium". www.mkm.ee. Retrieved 16 October 2022.
81. "SAMARTH Udyog Bharat 4.0".
82. "Society 5.0". Japanese Government, 2016. Retrieved 10 October 2023.
83. "Industry4wrd National Policy On Industry 4.0" (PDF). Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Malaysia. 2018. p. 76. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
84. ^ Schneegans, S.; Straza, T.; Lewis, J., eds. (11 June 2021). UNESCO Science Report: the Race Against Time for Smarter Development. Paris: UNESCO. ISBN 978-92-3-100450-6.
85. Kraemer-Mbula; Sheikheldin; Karimanzira (11 June 2021). Southern Africa. In UNESCO Science Report: the Race Against Time for Smarter Development. Paris: UNESCO. pp. 534–573. ISBN 978-92-3-100450-6.
86. Ayala, Mario; Cantu, Rob (2019). "THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS (IIOT): OPPORTUNITIES, RISKS, MITIGATIO" (PDF). Department of Homeland Security-Publications: 34 – via DHS.
87. Markus Liffler; Andreas Tschiesner (6 January 2013). "The Internet of Things and the future of manufacturing | McKinsey & Company". Mckinsey.com. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
88. ^ McDonagh, James; et al. (31 May 2020). "What Can Digitization Do For Formulated Product Innovation and Development". Polymer International. 70 (3): 248–255. doi:10.1002/pi.6056. S2CID 219766018. Archived from the original on 19 October 2020. Retrieved 28 August 2020.
89. "Formulus". Develop Safe and Effective Products with Formulus. Retrieved 17 August 2020.
90. "Innovation 4.0: A Digital Revolution for R&D". New Statesman. Retrieved 17 August 2020.
91. Norton, Michael; Mochon, Daniel; Ariely, Dan (9 September 2011). "The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love". Journal of Consumer Psychology. 22 (3): 453–460. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002.
92. Chalaris, M (2022). "Occupational Health and Safety, and Environmental Management on the Age of Fourth Industrial Revolution". Technium Business and Management. 2 (3): 1–5. doi:10.47577/business.v2i3.6941. S2CID 250252625.
93. Arghami, Sh.; Nasl Seraji, J.; Mohammad, K.; Farhangi, A.; van Vuuren, W. (2005). "Mental health in high-tech system". Iranian Journal of Public Health. 34 (1): 31–37.
94. Mayson, Sandra G. (2019). "Bias In, Bias Out". Yale Law Journal. 128 (8): 2218+.
95. Alves, Joel; Lima, Tânia M.; Gaspar, Pedro D. (January 2023). "Is Industry 5.0 a Human-Centred Approach? A Systematic Review". Processes. 11 (1): 193. doi:10.3390/pr11010193. ISSN 2227-9717.
96. Kraaijenbrink, Jeroen. "What Is Industry 5.0 And How It Will Radically Change Your Business Strategy?". Forbes. Retrieved 21 February 2024.
97. Rada, Michael; Schaller, Achim (2024), Gondlach, Kai; Brinkmann, Birgit; Brinkmann, Mark; Plath, Julia (eds.), "The Future of Industry 5.0: A Comprehensive Reflection on Sustainable Industrial Evolution", Regenerative Zukünfte und künstliche Intelligenz: Band 1: PLANET (in German), Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, pp. 341–350, doi:10.1007/978-3-658-43586-8_27, ISBN 978-3-658-43586-8, retrieved 14 September 2024

Sources

•  This article incorporates text from a free content work. Text taken from UNESCO Science Report: the Race Against Time for Smarter Development.​, Schneegans, S., T. Straza and J. Lewis (eds), UNESCO.

v t e Industrial and technological revolution
Proto First Second Third Fourth Fifth Potential future
Themes	Coal Coal mining Coke Cotton Industry/Manufacturing Invention Iron Machinery Metallurgy Sociology Steam power Steel Technology Textiles Water power Workforce Economies of agglomeration Economies of density Economies of scale
People/ groups	Richard Arkwright Thomas Boulsover Matthew Boulton James Brindley Isambard Kingdom Brunel Edmund Cartwright Henry Cort Thomas and George Cranege Samuel Crompton Abraham Darby I Abraham Darby II Abraham Darby III Francis Egerton, 3rd Duke of Bridgewater William Fairbairn James Hargreaves Hawks family Thomas Highs Eaton Hodgkinson Benjamin Huntsman Joseph Marie Jacquard John Kay (flying shuttle) John Kay (spinning frame) Francis Cabot Lowell Lunar Society Thomas Newcomen Robert Owen Lewis Paul William Radcliffe Richard Roberts Thomas Savery Samuel Slater John Smeaton George Stephenson Robert Stephenson Thomas Telford Richard Trevithick James Watt John Wilkinson John Wyatt
Places	Abbeydale Industrial Hamlet Allentown Bethlehem Bridgewater Canal Broseley Coalbrookdale Cromford Derwent Valley Mills Ironbridge New Lanark Portsmouth Block Mills Quarry Bank Mill Soho Foundry Stockton and Darlington Railway
Invention/ technology	Blast furnace Canal Cotton mill Crucible steel Factory Flying shuttle Newcomen steam engine Power loom Railway Reverberatory furnace Sheffield plate Spinning frame Spinning jenny Steam engine Stephenson's Rocket Water frame Watt steam engine
Social impact	Bourgeoisie Child labour History of the cooperative Movement Cottage industry Factory Acts Great Divergence Industrial unrest Luddite Proletariat Rochdale Pioneers Urbanization Industrial warfare
Reference	History of technology History of the British canal system Industrial archaeology List of United Kingdom-related topics Timeline of clothing and textiles technology Timeline of invention Timeline of materials technology Timeline of steam power
Category Commons

v t e Sociology
Outline History Timeline Index
General aspects	Public sociology Social research Social theory Sociological theory Sociological practice
Perspectives	Conflict theory Critical theory Structural functionalism Positivism Social constructionism Social darwinism Symbolic interactionism
Related fields and subfields	Anthropology Comparative sociology Criminology Cultural anthropology Demography Historical sociology Industrial society Political sociology Rural sociology Social anthropology Social movements Social psychology Sociolinguistics Urban sociology Sociology of art body consciousness culture death deviance economics education emotions environment family food gender health immigration knowledge law leisure medicine military race and ethnicity religion sport science small groups space stratification technology work
Major theorists	Sieyès Comte Martineau Tocqueville Marx Spencer Le Bon Ward Pareto Tönnies Veblen Simmel Durkheim Addams Mead Weber Du Bois Mannheim Elias Fromm Adorno Gehlen Aron Merton Nisbet Mills Bell Schoeck Goffman Bauman Foucault Luhmann Habermas Baudrillard Bourdieu Giddens
Methods	Quantitative Qualitative Comparative Computational Ethnographic Conversation analysis Historical Interview Mathematical Network analysis Social experiment Survey
Key themes	Society Globalization Human behavior Human environmental impact Identity Industrial revolutions 3 / 4 / 5 Popularity Social complexity Social environment Social equality Social equity Social power Social stratification Social structure Social cycle theory
Categories lists Journals Commons WikiProject Society portal

• 2015 neologisms
• 21st century
• Industrial automation
• Industrial computing
• Internet of things
• Technology forecasting
• Big data
• Industrial Revolution
• Fourth Industrial Revolution
• Knowledge economy