Misplaced Pages

International Review of Law and Economics

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Academic journal
International Review of Law and Economics
DisciplineLaw, economics
LanguageEnglish
Edited byEmanuela Carbonara, Yun-Chien Chang, N. Garoupa, E.A. Helland, J. Klick
Publication details
History1981–present
PublisherElsevier
Impact factor0.570 (2016)
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4 (alt) · Bluebook (alt)
NLM (alt) · MathSciNet (alt Paid subscription required)
BluebookInt'l Rev. L. & Econ.
ISO 4Int. Rev. Law Econ.
Indexing
CODEN (alt · alt2) · JSTOR (alt) · LCCN (alt)
MIAR · NLM (alt) · Scopus
ISSN0144-8188 (print)
1873-6394 (web)
Links

The International Review of Law and Economics is an academic journal covering the intersection of law and economics. It was established in 1981 by Butterworths and is currently published by Elsevier. The editors-in-chief are Emanuela Carbonara (University of Bologna), Yun-Chien Chang (Academia Sinica), N. Garoupa (Texas A&M University and Católica Global Law School), Eric Helland (Claremont McKenna College), and Jonathan Klick (University of Pennsylvania). According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2016 impact factor of 0.570.

In 2021 the journal's peer review process was called into question following an article by John Mark Ramseyer in which the author was accused of drawing from nonexistent contracts and putting forward a denialist position asserting that the comfort women forced into sexual slavery under the Japanese Empire were willing prostitutes.

Ramseyer controversy

In 2021, questions were raised about the International Review of Law and Economics' editorial practices following the online publication of an article by John Mark Ramseyer in which the author was accused of drawing from contracts he later admitted had never been located, construed the comfort women forced into sexual servitude under the Japanese Empire as prostitutes. Ramseyer published a response to his critics in January 2022 saying that his article had explained that it was not based on actual contracts, very few of which had probably survived the war, and describing the sources he had used. in The article led to numerous scholarly petitions, the resignation of an associate editor, and was written about in The New Yorker. In an open letter signed by over one thousand economists in February 2021, the authors expressed concern that "young scholars aspiring to enter our profession will be greatly dismayed by an article published in a scholarly economics journal that denies the existence of a government-sponsored system of sexual coercion and argues that a ten-year old girl can consent to work as a sex worker." Economists and Nobel laureates Alvin Roth and Paul Milgrom took issue with Ramseyer's application of game theory, and wrote in a joint statement that the article "reminded of Holocaust denial."

References

  1. "International Review of Law and Economics". 2016 Journal Citation Reports. Web of Science (Science ed.). Thomson Reuters. 2017.
  2. ^ Jeannie Suk Gersen (2021-02-26). "Seeking the True Story of the Comfort Women". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2021-02-26.
  3. Youmi Kim and Mike Ives (2021-02-26). "A Harvard Professor Called Wartime Sex Slaves 'Prostitutes.' One Pushed Back". The New York Times. Retrieved 2021-02-26.
  4. Ramseyer, J. Mark (2022-01-04). "Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War: A Response to My Critics". The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series. 1075. Rochester, NY. SSRN 4000145 – via SSRN.
  5. "Harvard Prof Rejects Historical Consensus on 'Comfort Women'". Inside Higher Ed. 2021-02-16. Retrieved 2021-02-24.
  6. "Ramseyer 'comfort women' paper challenged by historians". Korea JoongAng Daily. 2021-02-24. Retrieved 2021-02-24.
  7. ""Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War": The Case for Retraction on Grounds of Academic Misconduct". The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus. 2021-02-18. Retrieved 2021-02-25.
  8. "Letter by Concerned Economists Regarding "Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War" in the International Review of Law and Economics". Retrieved 2021-02-24. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  9. "Hundreds of Scholars Demand Corrective Measures to Ramseyer's Article". KBS World. 2021-02-24. Retrieved 2021-02-24.
  10. "Statement by Al Roth and Paul Milgrom" (PDF). chwe.net. February 27, 2021. Retrieved 2021-03-03.
  11. "Two Nobel Economics Prize winners say Ramseyer's paper reminds them of Holocaust denial". Hankyoreh. 2021-03-03. Retrieved 2021-03-03.

External links

Categories: