The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the English-speaking world and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (April 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Part of a series on |
Earthquakes |
---|
Types |
Causes |
Characteristics |
Measurement |
Prediction |
Other topics |
An intraplate earthquake occurs in the interior of a tectonic plate, in contrast to an interplate earthquake on the boundary of a tectonic plate. They are relatively rare compared to the more familiar interplate earthquakes. Buildings far from plate boundaries are rarely protected with seismic retrofitting, so large intraplate earthquakes can inflict heavy damage. Examples of damaging intraplate earthquakes are the devastating 2001 Gujarat earthquake, the 2011 Christchurch earthquake, the 2012 Indian Ocean earthquakes, the 2017 Puebla earthquake, the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes, and the 1886 Charleston earthquake. An earthquake that occurs within a subducting plate is known as an intraslab earthquake.
Description
The Earth's crust is made up of seven primary and eight secondary tectonic plates, plus dozens of tertiary microplates. The large plates move very slowly on top of convection currents in the underlying mantle. Because they do not all move in the same direction, plates often directly collide or slide laterally along each other, a tectonic environment that makes interplate earthquakes frequent.
By contrast, relatively few earthquakes occur in intraplate environments away from plate junctures. These earthquakes often occur at the location of ancient failed rifts, partial fractures of existing plates, because they may leave a weakness in the crust vulnerable to regional tectonic strain.
Intraslab earthquakes radiate more seismic energy than interplate earthquakes (megathrust earthquakes) of a similar magnitude. This variation makes seismic energy a better measure for the potential macroseismic effects of an earthquake than the more common seismic moment used to calculate the magnitude Mw .
Examples
Examples of intraplate earthquakes include those in Mineral, Virginia, in 2011 (estimated magnitude 5.8), Newcastle, New South Wales in 1989, New Madrid in 1811 and 1812 (estimated magnitude as high as 8.6), the Boston (Cape Ann) earthquake of 1755 (estimated magnitude 6.0 to 6.3), earthquakes felt in New York City in 1737 and 1884 (both quakes estimated at 5.5 magnitude), and the Charleston earthquake in South Carolina in 1886 (estimated magnitude 6.5 to 7.3). The Charleston quake was particularly surprising because, unlike Boston and New York, the area had almost no history of even minor earthquakes.
In 2001, a large intraplate earthquake devastated the region of Gujarat, India. The earthquake occurred far from any plate boundaries, which meant the region above the epicenter was unprepared for earthquakes. In particular, the Kutch district suffered tremendous damage, where the death toll was over 12,000 and the total death toll was higher than 20,000.
In 2017, the 24–29 km deep magnitude 6.5 Botswana earthquake that shook eastern Botswana occurred at over 300 km from the nearest active plate boundary. The event occurred in an underpopulated area of Botswana.
The 1888 earthquake in Río de la Plata was an intraplate quake, from reactivated faults in the Quilmes Trough, far from the boundaries of the South American plate. With a magnitude greater than 5.0 it was felt "in the cities of Buenos Aires, La Plata and other small towns and villages along the Rio de Plata coastal regions." The towns of Punta del Este and Maldonado in Uruguay were hit by a tsunami generated by the quake.
Causes
Many cities live with the seismic risk of a rare, large intraplate earthquake. The cause of these earthquakes is often uncertain. In many cases, the causative fault is deeply buried and sometimes cannot even be found. Some studies have shown that quakes can be caused by fluids moving up the crust along ancient fault zones. In such circumstances, it is difficult to estimate the seismic hazard for a given city, especially if there was only one earthquake in historical times. Some progress is being made in understanding the fault mechanics driving these earthquakes.
Intraplate earthquakes may be unrelated to ancient fault zones and instead caused by deglaciation or erosion.
Prediction
Scientists continue to search for the causes of these earthquakes, and especially for some indication of how often they recur. The best success has come with detailed micro-seismic monitoring, involving dense arrays of seismometers. In this manner, very small earthquakes associated with a causative fault can be located with great accuracy, and in most cases these line up in patterns consistent with faulting. Cryoseisms can sometimes be mistaken for intraplate earthquakes.
Intraslab earthquake
In seismology, an intraslab earthquake occurs within a subducting plate, known as slabs. They are most frequent in older slabs which are colder, whereas younger slabs that are warmer rarely produces earthquake. They can be detected within these slabs at depths exceeding 500 km (310 mi); they are also the source of intermediate and deep-focus earthquakes. Intraslab earthquakes at depths 20–60 km (12–37 mi) are considered shallow earthquakes and can be destructive to cities. One of the deadliest earthquakes of the 20th century was the 1970 Ancash earthquake, measuring Mw 7.9 and occurring off the coast of Peru. The 2001 Nisqually and 1949 Olympia earthquakes were also intraslab events.
See also
- New Madrid seismic zone – Major seismic zone in the southern and midwestern United States
- Wabash Valley seismic zone – Tectonic region in the Midwestern United States
- Saint Lawrence rift system – Seismically active zone paralleling the Saint Lawrence River
References
- Iwata, Tomotaka; Asano, Kimiyuki (2011). "Characterization of the Heterogeneous Source Model of Intraslab Earthquakes Toward Strong Ground Motion Prediction". Pure and Applied Geophysics. 168 (1–2): 117–124. Bibcode:2011PApGe.168..117I. doi:10.1007/s00024-010-0128-7. S2CID 140602323.
- Senoa, Tetsuzo; Yoshida, Masaki (2004). "Where and why do large shallow intraslab earthquakes occur?". Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 141 (3): 183–206. Bibcode:2004PEPI..141..183S. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2003.11.002.
- Hough, Susan E.; Seeber, Leonardo; Armbruster, John G. (October 2003). "Intraplate Triggered Earthquakes: Observations and Interpretation". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 101 (3). Seismological Society of America: 2212–2221. Bibcode:2003BuSSA..93.2212H. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.189.5055. doi:10.1785/0120020055.
- Yang, Xiaotao (2014). "Seismicity of the Ste. Genevieve Seismic Zone based on Observations from the EarthScope OIINK Flexible Array". Seismological Research Letters. 85 (6): 1285–1294. Bibcode:2014SeiRL..85.1285Y. doi:10.1785/0220140079.
- Leyton, Felipe; Ruiz, Javier A.; Camposa, Jaime; Kausel, Edgar (2009). "Intraplate and interplate earthquakes in Chilean subduction zone: A theoretical and observational comparison". Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 175 (1): 37–46. Bibcode:2009PEPI..175...37L. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2008.03.017. citing Choy, G.L.; Boatwright, J.; Kirby, S., 2002. The radiated seismic energy and apparent stress of interplate and intraslab earthquakes at subduction-zone environments: Implications for seismic hazard estimation, in The Cascadia subduction zone and related subduction systems–Seismic structure, intraslab earthquakes and processes, and earthquake hazards, Open-File Report 02–328, pp. 107–114, eds Kirby, S.H.; Wang, K.; Dunlop, S., US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.
- Penick, James L. The New Madrid Earthquakes. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 1981. ISBN 0-8262-0344-2
- ^ Kolawole, F.; Atekwana, E. A.; Malloy, S.; Stamps, D. S.; Grandin, R.; Abdelsalam, M. G.; Leseane, K.; Shemang, E. M. (2017-09-09). "Aeromagnetic, gravity, and Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar analyses reveal the causative fault of the 3 April 2017 Mw6.5 Moiyabana, Botswana, earthquake". Geophysical Research Letters. 44 (17): 8837–8846. Bibcode:2017GeoRL..44.8837K. doi:10.1002/2017gl074620. ISSN 0094-8276. S2CID 134584787.
- Benavídes Sosa, Alberto (1998). "Seismicidad y seismotectónica en Uruguay". Física de la Tierra (in Spanish) (10): 167–186.
- ^ Rossello, Eduardo Antonio; Heit, Benjamín; Bianchi, Marcelo (2020). "Shallow intraplate seismicity in the Buenos Aires province (Argentina) and surrounding areas: is it related to the Quilmes Trough?". Boletín de Geología. 42 (2): 31–48. doi:10.18273/revbol.v42n2-2020002. S2CID 219934403. Archived from the original on 4 August 2022.
- Gardonio, B.; Jolivet, R.; Calais, E.; Leclère, H. (2018-07-13). "The April 2017 Mw6.5 Botswana Earthquake: An Intraplate Event Triggered by Deep Fluids" (PDF). Geophysical Research Letters. 45 (17): 8886–8896. Bibcode:2018GeoRL..45.8886G. doi:10.1029/2018gl078297. ISSN 0094-8276. S2CID 134667492.
- Shobe, Charlie (18 December 2018). "Can Rivers Cause Earthquakes?". Scientific American. Retrieved 26 December 2018.
- Nakajima, Junichi (2019). "Revisiting Intraslab Earthquakes Beneath Kyushu, Japan: Effect of Ridge Subduction on Seismogenesis". Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 124 (8): 8660–8678. doi:10.1029/2019JB017869.
- Seno, Tetsuzo; Yoshida, Masaki (2004). "Where and why do large shallow intraslab earthquakes occur?". Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 141 (3): 183–206. Bibcode:2004PEPI..141..183S. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2003.11.002.
Further reading
- Stein, S., and S. Mazzotti (2007). "Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science and Policy Issues", Geological Society of America, Special Paper 425.
External links
- Intraplate Earthquakes: Possible Mechanisms for the New Madrid and Charleston Earthquakes
- Symptomatic Features of Intraplate Earthquakes – PDF
- A physical understanding of large intraplate earthquakes – PDF
- Earthquake Hazards Program, USGS