1994 United States Supreme Court case
J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B. | |
---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | |
Argued November 2, 1993 Decided April 19, 1994 | |
Full case name | J. E. B., Petitioner v. Alabama ex rel. T. B. |
Citations | 511 U.S. 127 (more)114 S.Ct. 1419; 128 L. Ed. 2d 89; 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3121; 62 USLW 4219; 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) ¶ 42,967 |
Case history | |
Prior | Certiorari to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals 606 So.2d 156 |
Holding | |
Intentional discrimination on the basis of gender by state actors in the use of peremptory strikes in jury selection violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Blackmun, joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg |
Concurrence | O'Connor |
Concurrence | Kennedy |
Dissent | Rehnquist |
Dissent | Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, Thomas |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV |
J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that peremptory challenges based solely on a prospective juror's sex are unconstitutional. J.E.B. extended the court's existing precedent in Batson v. Kentucky (1986), which found race-based peremptory challenges in criminal trials unconstitutional, and Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company (1991), which extended that principle to civil trials. As in Batson, the court found that sex-based challenges violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Background
On behalf of T.B., the mother of a minor child, the state sued J.E.B. for child support in Jackson County, Alabama. During jury selection, challenges intentionally targeted male potential jurors resulting in an all-female jury.
Decision
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2022) |
The majority opinion was written by Justice Blackmun. Justice O'Connor wrote a concurring opinion, and Justice Kennedy separately concurred in the judgment. Chief Justice Rehnquist filed a separate dissenting opinion. Justice Scalia also filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice Thomas.
See also
- Hoyt v. Florida (1961)
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 511
- List of United States Supreme Court cases
- Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
References
- J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994).
- Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., 500 U.S. 614 (1991).
Further reading
- Currie, C. M.; Pillick, A. M. (1996). "Sex Discrimination in the Selection and Participation of Female Jurors: A Post-J.E.B. Analysis". Judges' Journal. 35 (1): 2–6, 38–41. ISSN 0047-2972.
- Harden, L. L. M. (1995). "The End of the Peremptory Challenge? The Implications of J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel T.B. for Jury Selection in Alabama". Alabama Law Review. 47: 243. ISSN 0002-4279.
- Wichterman, S. L. (1995). "JEB v. Alabama ex rel. TB: Gender-Based Peremptory Challenges on Trial". Northern Illinois University Law Review. 16: 209. ISSN 0734-1490. Archived from the original on April 17, 2009.
External links
- Text of J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
United States equal protection and criminal procedure case law | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |
- United States Supreme Court cases
- Batson challenge case law
- United States civil procedure case law
- 1994 in United States case law
- 1994 in Alabama
- Legal history of Alabama
- United States Sixth Amendment jury case law
- Jackson County, Mississippi
- Child support
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
- United States gender discrimination case law
- United States Supreme Court stubs