Jimmy Chua Chap Seng | |
---|---|
1986 police mugshot of Jimmy Chua | |
Born | Chua Chap Seng 28 August 1947 Singapore |
Died | 10 October 1989 (aged 42) Pudu Prison, Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Malaysia |
Other names | Jimmy Chua Hokkien Chai |
Occupation | Police officer (former) |
Known for | Ringleader of the 1986 Pudu Prison siege Murder of police constable Mohamed Yassin Ismail |
Criminal status | Executed |
Spouse | Three wives |
Children | Two sons |
Conviction(s) | Illegal possession of firearms (one count) Illegal possession of ammunition (one count) |
Criminal charge | Murder Illegal possession of firearms Illegal possession of ammunition Kidnapping for ransom |
Penalty | Death penalty |
Jimmy Chua Chap Seng (蔡捷成, 28 August 1947 – 10 October 1989), nicknamed Hokkien Chai, was a Singaporean criminal and former police officer who was infamous for masterminding the 1986 Pudu Prison hostage incident. Chua, who allegedly committed the murder of a police officer and several firearm offences in Malaysia, was detained at Pudu Prison when he and five other inmates decided to orchestrate a prison escape by taking two members of the prison staff hostage for six days. The incident ended with no fatalities, and Chua and his five accomplices were all arrested and faced kidnapping charges over the hostage incident. However, in a separate court case, Chua was sentenced to death for firearm charges under the Internal Security Act, and was hanged on 10 October 1989 without being convicted for his role in the Pudu incident, which oversaw the imprisonment of his five associates for the case.
Early life
Born on 28 August 1947 in Singapore, Chua Chap Seng, also known as Jimmy Chua, was the third of seven sons and three daughters in his family, and grew up in a kampung in Bukit Panjang. His father died when he was 13, and his mother singlehandedly brought him and his siblings up, and made a living by raising pigs at Bukit Batok and selling fish at a market. Chua was described to be an obedient child and quiet schoolboy, and a year after his father's death, Chua dropped out of Bukit Panjang Government High School. According to his neighbours and family in Singapore, the loss of his father was likely to have caused him to gradually turn to a life of crime. Prior to 1984, one of Chua's siblings, his sixth brother, died at age of 24 due to an illness.
Chua joined the Singapore Police Force in 1966, and three years later, he rose to become a police investigator. However, Chua was later dismissed due to professional misconduct. News reports in 1972 revealed that Chua was one of the four police officers charged in a bribery case, and Chua was sentenced to jail for 15 months as a result.
In his adulthood, Chua reportedly had three wives in Malaysia. He had two sons (born in 1974 and 1978 respectively) from his three marriages.
Criminal charges (1984)
After the end of his short-lived police career, Jimmy Chua Chap Seng turned to a life of crime, and was allegedly involved in several other criminal activities, including possessing firearms and acting as the leader of a secret society.
The exact details of Chua's criminal history was scarce, but on 8 February 1984, Chua was involved in the murder of a policeman in Malaysia. On that date itself, Chua, who was then committing vehicle theft in Jalan Changkat Abdullah, Kuala Lumpur, was arrested by Police Constable (PC) Mohamed Yassin bin Ismail (also spelt Mohamed Yasin bin Ismail). PC Mohamed Yassin was handcuffing Chua when Chua managed to raise his free hand to grab a pistol, and he fired the gun thrice at point blank, and the three shots hit PC Mohamed Yassin on the abdomen and chest. PC Mohamed Yassin, then 27 years old, died one hour after he was rushed to a nearby hospital.
Chua managed to evade the police for several days after the murder, and the Royal Malaysia Police, in an effort to trace PC Mohamed Yassin's killer, sought help from their Singaporean counterparts to search for the suspect, after they found the suspect to have possible links to a gang of vehicle thieves from Singapore (where similar cases with the same modus operandi occurred). Chua was arrested by the Malaysian police at Jalan Khoo Teik Ee on 14 February 1984, six days after PC Mohamed Yassin's death, and thereby charged with murder. As Chua was found to be in illegal possession of a .32 Llama pistol and six bullets at the time of his arrest, he was additionally charged with illegal possession of firearms and ammunition. Under the laws of Malaysia, either of the charges which Chua faced could warrant the death penalty if found guilty. Chua was remanded at Pudu Prison since 13 August 1984 while awaiting trial for the above offences.
In April 1985, Chua escaped from hospital while receiving treatment for an illness. He was eventually recaptured at Seremban after a manhunt, and taken back to Pudu Prison, where he was detained since 1984 while awaiting trial.
Pudu Prison siege
Hostage incident
On 17 October 1986, the second year of his incarceration at Pudu Prison, 39-year-old Jimmy Chua, together with five fellow prisoners, orchestrated a prison escape attempt.
Knowing the imminent fact that he would be sentenced to death, Chua decided to escape from prison in order to avoid the death penalty. Chua roped in five detainees to join him. Three of the prisoners – 32-year-old Lam Hok Sung (林福生), 24-year-old Ng Lai Huat (黃來發) and 19-year-old Sim Ah Lan (沈亞南) – were pending trial for firearm offences under the Internal Security Act, while the remaining two – 27-year-old Pang Boon Boo (方文武) and 21-year-old Yap See Keong (葉志強) – were charged for assault and rioting respectively. Similar to Chua himself, Lam, Ng and Sim were at risk of facing the gallows if convicted of the firearm offences they were indicted for. Sim reportedly joined in the plot as he was dissatisfied with the poor living conditions.
On 17 October 1986, Chua and his five accomplices were taken to the prison medical unit to undergo a routine checkup. Upon entry, Chua and his accomplices took Dr. Radzi Jaffar, a 45-year-old skin specialist and Abdul Aziz Abdul Majid, a 38-year-old laboratory technician, hostage and brandished their makeshift knives (made from improvised items). Chua and his gang would hold both medical officers hostage for the following six days and five nights, and they demanded the police to reduce their respective criminal charges and to provide them cars and money in exchange for the freedom and safety of the two hostages, but the police did not back down. A former inmate, who spent time at Pudu Prison for drug consumption at that time, stated in 2010 that he remembered the gang of six shouting at all the other prisoners to go back to their cells in Malay, "Semua Masuk Bilik!". Some of the prison staff and inmates – including ex-politician Mokhtar Hashim (who was serving a life sentence for murder at the prison) – present at the medical center were forced out of the center, before the gang of six locked themselves in the centre with the hostages. The two hostages told the press after their rescue that the six captors threatened to harm them during the siege.
Prisons Department director-general, Datuk Ibrahim Mohamed, took charge of formulating a plan to arrest Chua and his gang and to save the hostages, and none of the outsiders were allowed to enter the prison for fear of jeopardizing the rescue operation, and elite police units were deployed to stake out at the prison compound. Food were continually sent in to the medical center, but the inmates allowed only the hostages to eat the food while they sustained themselves on snacks left in the medical center. The police and government officials also attempted to negotiate with the gang of six to release the hostages and surrender themselves, and many of the gang's family members, including Chua's eight-year-old son and 66-year-old mother, went into the prison to persuade the six to give themselves up to the police. Malaysian politician Lee Lam Thye also offered to become a hostage in place of the two medical officers. Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who was concerned with a potential political fallout should bloodshed happened in the crisis, ordered the police to not resort to violence unless necessary. The prison was under lockdown and the general inmate population was not allowed to go out of their cells for bath time. Two bomohs suggested that they should conduct rituals with hopes to make the six surrender themselves, but the prison authorities denied inviting the bomohs.
It was reported that throughout the six days when the incident was ongoing, the pressure of the situation began to take a toll on the inmates, who all began to have second thoughts of backing out. Eventually, one of the six prisoners, Pang Boon Boo, decided to betray his five partners and came into contact with Datuk Ibrahim, and helped the police to enter the prison medical center. After Pang, whose identity was originally withheld in earlier media sources, gave a signal, a team of policemen, armed with canes and wooden sticks, barged into the center and subdued Chua and his associates while rescuing both Abdul Aziz and Radzi, who were unharmed. Pang, who helped the police to end the crisis, was transferred to Kajang Prison with better living conditions, as part of a condition behind his assistance of the authorities. Pang's father, who visited his son with his wife, younger son (Pang's brother) and grandson (Pang's child) during the hostage situation, also confirmed to the press that his son wanted to back out but Chua berated him for being cowardly.
After the safe return of the hostages, Datuk Ibrahim was praised for the successful closure of the horrific chapter that shook the prison and the whole country alike. In June 1987, about a year after the incident, one of the police officers who contributed to the arrest of Chua and his gang was awarded for his efforts.
Pudu Prison siege trial
On 11 December 1986, Chua and his five accomplices – Lam, Ng, Sim, Pang and Yap – were charged with kidnapping for ransom under Section 3(1) of the Kidnapping Act, which carried either the death penalty or life imprisonment if found guilty. The prisoners, while pending trial, had to be on close watch by heavily armed guards to prevent them from committing suicide, and the mastermind Jimmy Chua, who went on trial for his other crimes before the Pudu case, had to be escorted by more than 20 heavily armed officers to ensure security.
Eventually, in April 1987, the gang of six was ordered to stand trial at the High Court on a later date, and the trial took place in March 1990. However, prior to the kidnapping trial, Chua was since separately convicted and executed in 1989 for the other offences he committed prior to the Pudu Prison case, and therefore he was neither put on trial nor convicted for his role in the prison incident. The court proceedings later continued against the remaining five suspects in the absence of Chua.
It was the prosecution's case that the alleged demands made by Chua to the police that his associates and himself should be given money and getaway vehicles in exchange for the freedom of the hostages they kidnapped, and by strict application of the law, Chua's demands amounted to a ransom and it formed the basis of their case against Chua's five accomplices for kidnapping. However, the death of Chua left a huge impact on the trial outcome, as it posed a question of whether or not the kidnapping charges could be substantiated against his accomplices with his alleged ransom attempts being uncorroborated and unverified without his testimony or cross-examination.
Leading criminal lawyer Karpal Singh, who represented two of the five accomplices, argued that the purported demands of ransom made by Chua, allegedly on behalf of himself and the five, should not be used against his clients and the other accused persons, partly given that Chua had died and there was no way to verify the validity of these alleged ransom requests as hearsay evidence against the five remaining defendants. Karpal's objections, as well as similar arguments made by other lawyers of the defendants, were accepted by the trial court, which ruled that Chua's alleged demands cannot be admitted as hearsay evidence.
On 16 March 1990, the five accomplices of Chua pleaded guilty to reduced charges of wrongful confinement and abduction, therefore escaping a possible death sentence. Yap and Pang were each sentenced to three years in jail while the remaining three were jailed for five years each. However, despite evading the gallows for the Pudu hostage incident, one of the five men, Lam, was separately sentenced to hang for a firearms offence in 1988 in another trial and likely executed after losing his final appeal in 1997.
Aftermath of siege
The Pudu Prison incident brought light to the problems experienced at the prison, including the overcrowding of Pudu Prison and the poor living conditions faced by the inmates. There were calls for improvement of the prison's living environment itself.
Throughout the following decades after it occurred, the Pudu Prison siege was known to be one of Malaysia's shocking crimes and its first, yet unprecedented incident of a prison hostage situation, and the infamy of Chua endured through time. The prison itself eventually went defunct, and the prison building was demolished by 2012.
24 years after the Pudu Prison siege, the case was featured in a documentary in 2010, titled the "Beyond Bars: KL's Pudu Prison".
Execution
A month after he masterminded the Pudu Prison siege, on 21 November 1986, 39-year-old Jimmy Chua was tried and found guilty of illegal possession of firearms and ammunition under the Internal Security Act, and sentenced to death by the Kuala Lumpur High Court. Subsequently, the Supreme Court of Malaysia (now renamed the Federal Court of Malaysia), the highest court of the nation, dismissed Chua's final appeal on 19 September 1988.
Chua was hanged on 10 October 1989 at Pudu Prison, at the age of 42. Prior to his execution, Chua was given a last meal of meat and seafood bought by his family, and shared it with 28 other inmates at the prison's death row section, and received a last visit from his friends and family (including his two sons and three wives) in Singapore.
See also
References
- "拥有军火罪成立蔡捷成被判死刑". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 22 November 1986.
- "流金年代(第16篇)‧ 1986年 半山芭监狱 囚犯挟持人质". 中國報 China Press (in Chinese). 16 November 2018.
- "谈往事慈母心酸". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 19 October 1986.
- "Convicts' leader was a quiet boy, says family". The Straits Times. 21 October 1986.
- "Four PCs jailed 15 months for graft". The Straits Times. 10 March 1972.
- "造反囚犯之一蔡捷成有三妻". Lianhe Wanbao (in Chinese). 22 October 1986.
- "PC is killed while arresting suspect". The Straits Times. 10 February 1984.
- "偷车匪徒开枪拒捕隆一警员中弹殒命". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 12 February 1984.
- ^ "事件主角". Lianhe Wanbao (in Chinese). 23 October 1986.
- "怀疑与本地偷车集团有关 大马警方要求我警方协助追查杀死警员枪匪". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 12 February 1984.
- "CID helps Malaysian police hunt for gunman". Singapore Monitor. 11 February 1984.
- "S'pore prisoner in hospital escape". The Straits Times. 7 April 1985.
- "半山芭监狱扣押人质 新加坡前警员死刑". Shin Min Daily (in Chinese). 21 November 1986.
- "六囚犯真面目". Shin Min Daily (in Chinese). 21 October 1986.
- "Escapes due to lax security at hospitals". The Straits Times. 16 April 1985.
- "半山芭监狱六囚犯挟持人质128小时 事件始末". Lianhe Wanbao (in Chinese). 23 October 1986.
- "滋事犯人沈亚南说 监狱里面环境复杂逼使他这么做". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 22 October 1986.
- "昨晨送上绞台 死囚福建仔 爱女人与枪". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 19 October 1986.
- "攻心術分解6囚犯凝聚力‧特警不費鎗彈救人質". 光明日报 Guangming Daily (in Chinese). 8 August 2009.
- "重遊3天‧拾碎塊留念‧前囚犯激動憶當年". 光明日报 Guangming Daily (in Chinese). 3 July 2010.
- "為自由掀監獄風雲‧囚犯挾獄醫對峙6天". 光明日报 Guangming Daily (in Chinese). 1 August 2009.
- "Hostage tells of death threats and cruelty". The Straits Times. 24 October 1986.
- "监狱当局禁访客探访人质". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 22 October 1986.
- "Pudu drama: Elite unit on stand-by". The Straits Times. 21 October 1986.
- "副内政部长强调确保两人质安全". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 21 October 1986.
- "全国监狱总监续劝滋事囚犯投降". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 22 October 1986.
- "蔡捷成与母亲会面". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 22 October 1986.
- "蔡捷成八岁儿子监狱内会见父亲". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 20 October 1986.
- "低头无语对慈母 弟弟劝他投降彭文河答应考虑". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 22 October 1986.
- "李霖泰愿当中间人助警与拘留犯谈判". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 19 October 1986.
- ^ "他 80年代神枪手 黑帮煞星". 中國報 China Press (in Chinese). 26 September 2021.
- ^ "Lessons from the Pudu siege". The Straits Times. 26 October 1986.
- "隆囚犯挟持医生事件未解决 两巫师建议施法术捉拿六名滋事者". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 21 October 1986.
- "副内长否认邀巫师解决囚犯扣人质事件". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 22 October 1986.
- "Stress and disunity may help end prison crisisoff". The Straits Times. 24 October 1986.
- "Pudu six nabbed, hostages freed in lightning rescue". The Straits Times. 23 October 1986.
- "Turncoat prisoner gave vital tip-off". The Straits Times. 24 October 1986.
- "Prisoner helped out in rescue operations". The New Straits Times. 9 April 1987.
- "被指态度固执不肯投降 方文武感惊奇表示愿意投降". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 22 October 1986.
- "Prison chief hailed as hero of the day". The Straits Times. 26 October 1986.
- "监狱内挟持医生六囚犯被控绑架". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 12 December 1986.
- "挟持人质又敲诈相等于绑票罪行". Lianhe Wanbao (in Chinese). 23 October 1986.
- "Round-the-clock watch to prevent suicide". The Straits Times. 24 October 1986.
- "Tight security at trial of ex-Singapore policeman". The Straits Times. 20 November 1986.
- "Six to stand trial for prison siege kidnap". The Straits Times. 18 April 1987.
- "Cop: I read about hanging in newspapers". The New Straits Times. 15 March 1990.
- Ng Lai Huat and others v Public Prosecutor , High Court (Malaysia).
- "Wrong to charge accused with kidnap, says counsel". The New Straits Times. 16 March 1990.
- "Five in prison abduction case jailed". The Straits Times. 17 March 1990.
- "Five in Pudu jail case found guilty". The New Straits Times. 17 March 1990.
- "Condemned man thanks the judge". The New Straits Times. 4 February 1989.
- "Death row inmate seeks forgiveness". The New Straits Times. 3 December 1997.
- "NST175: For 100 years a city landmark". The New Straits Times. 20 August 2020.
- "鐵窗生涯:吉隆坡半山芭監獄 Beyond Bars: KL's Pudu Prison". Portico Media. Retrieved 23 July 2024.
- "Pudu siege ringleader to hang for arms offence". The Straits Times. 22 November 1986.
- "被控拥枪弹罪成立 隆"牢变"首脑蔡捷成判死刑". Lianhe Wanbao (in Chinese). 21 November 1986.
- "半山芭监狱挟持人质 死囚蔡捷成上诉遭最高法院驳回". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 20 September 1988.
- "昨晨送上绞台 死囚福建仔 爱女人与枪". Lianhe Wanbao (in Chinese). 11 October 1989.