Misplaced Pages

John A. Rizzo

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from John Rizzo) American attorney (1947–2021) "John Rizzo" redirects here. For the politician, see John Rizzo (politician). For the baseball player, see Johnny Rizzo.

John A. Rizzo
BornJohn Anthony Rizzo
(1947-10-06)October 6, 1947
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.
DiedAugust 6, 2021(2021-08-06) (aged 73)
Washington, D.C., U.S.
EducationBrown University (BA)
George Washington University (JD)
OccupationLawyer
Known forActing General Counsel of the CIA
Spouses
Priscilla Walton Layton ​ ​(divorced)​
Sharon Knight ​ ​(m. 1993; died 2021)​

John Anthony Rizzo (October 6, 1947 – August 6, 2021) was an American attorney who worked as a lawyer in the Central Intelligence Agency for 34 years. He was the deputy counsel or acting general counsel of the CIA for the first nine years of the War on Terror, during which the CIA held dozens of detainees in black site prisons around the globe.

During the George W. Bush administration, the Office of Legal Counsel in the Department of Justice approved various forms of torture (referred to as "enhanced interrogation techniques") in memos to Rizzo for use by CIA interrogators at the black sites. Rizzo signed off on all CIA-directed drone strikes from September 2001 until October 2009.

He was a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution and Senior Counsel at the Steptoe & Johnson law firm.

Early life and education

Rizzo was born in Boston on October 6, 1947. His father, Arthur, worked as an executive at a department store, and his mother, Frances (McLaughlin), was a housewife. He studied political science at Brown University, graduating with a bachelor's degree in 1969. He was a member of the fraternity Beta Theta Pi. Due to a kidney stone, he was dismissed from the Vietnam War draft, an event he later described as "the happiest day of my life up to that time." He earned a Juris Doctor from George Washington University Law School, from which he graduated with honors in June 1972.

Career

Rizzo's first job out of law school was at the Treasury Department, where he started work in the Customs Service in August 1972.

CIA service

Rizzo was hired at the CIA in 1976, just after the Church Committee released its report on the assassination of foreign leaders. By 1979, Rizzo became the staff lawyer for the Directorate of Operations, the CIA's clandestine branch. He served as the liaison between the CIA and the congressional investigators studying the Iran-Contra affair in the 1980s. Rizzo became Acting General Counsel of the CIA in November 2001, a position that was traditionally filled by someone from outside the agency.

Rizzo was the Acting General Counsel of the CIA from late 2001 to late 2002 and from mid-2004 until late 2009. He was Deputy General Counsel in the interim period from 2002 to 2004, while Scott Muller was General Counsel.

The Bush administration nominated Rizzo as General Counsel of the CIA in mid-2007, but Democratic Senator Ron Wyden (OR) blocked his confirmation by the Senate Intelligence Committee. Wyden opposed Rizzo due to his involvement in approving the CIA's interrogation practices during the war on terror, which included torture. The Bush administration withdrew his nomination, but kept Rizzo as Acting General Counsel until his retirement in October 2009.

Sabrina De Sousa says Rizzo was one of the CIA officials that approved the extraordinary rendition of Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr, also known as Abu Omar, from Milan, Italy, to a prison in Egypt. Nasr was held for four years and says he was tortured.

Rizzo received the Thomas C. Clark Award from the Federal Bar Association and the Distinguished Career Intelligence Medal, the highest recognition awarded to a career CIA officer.

Enhanced interrogation techniques

Main article: Enhanced interrogation techniques See also: Torture Memos and Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture

The Joint Personnel Recovery Agency, which ran the U.S. military's SERE program to train U.S. personnel to resist harsh interrogation methods, issued a memo with an attachment written to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense in July 2002. The memo, which was passed on from the Pentagon to Rizzo, referred to the use of extreme duress on detainees as "torture" and warned that it would produce "unreliable information." Due to concerns about potential exposure to criminal liability in connection with the mistreatment of detainees, Rizzo requested a letter from the Department of Justice stating they would "declin to prosecute future activity that might violate federal law." Rizzo's request was "flatly refused."

Rizzo sent a request to the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel for an opinion as to whether certain interrogation techniques would violate the prohibition against torture. The OLC issued a memo signed by Jay S. Bybee to Rizzo on August 1, 2002; this was the first of what became known as the Torture Memos, in which the Justice Department authorized specific techniques to be used in interrogations. It approved 10 techniques, including waterboarding. Rizzo concurred on the legality of these techniques and saw to it that they were implemented by the CIA.

Rizzo traveled with David Addington, the Vice President's chief of staff; William Haynes, General Counsel of the Department of Defense; and Michael Chertoff, then the head of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, to consult with officers at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in late September 2002. One week later, a CIA lawyer told personnel with the military intelligence interrogation team at Guantanamo that, "if the detainee dies, you're doing it wrong."

In 2005, CIA lawyers reviewed copies of videotapes made during interrogation of detainees and expressed their concerns to Rizzo. He requested the OLC to issue new statements about the legality of the enhanced interrogation techniques. The Los Angeles Times reported that Rizzo was becoming "increasingly anxious in the years after the Sept. 11 attacks that agency employees were being pressured to use methods that might later place them in legal jeopardy." The OLC issued three memos, signed by Steven G. Bradbury, then head of OLC, in May 2005 that stated the techniques did not violate the Convention Against Torture, as ratified by the United States in 1994. Later in 2005, Rizzo traveled with other CIA officials, including Kyle Foggo, to several black sites, to assure CIA employees that their interrogation activities were legal. The CIA destroyed most of the detainee interrogation videotapes in 2005, a decision which dismayed Rizzo because it was done without his input.

Based on advice from Rizzo, then CIA director Porter Goss halted the CIA interrogation program conducted at black sites in late 2005. The United States Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006) that the military commissions and Combatant Status Review Panels were unconstitutional because they were not authorized by Congress and also that they deprived detainees of due process and protections under other laws. After that decision, Rizzo told his colleagues that the program was becoming increasingly difficult to maintain. With the likely passage of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which authorized the administration's plan for a military court at Guantanamo outside the existing federal and military justice systems, the CIA transferred the fourteen high-value detainees to military custody at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.

By the 2008 presidential election, considerable material had been revealed by the press, civil law suits brought by civil liberties organizations and a Congressional investigation about the interrogation practices of the Bush administration. During the campaign, Barack Obama had vowed to change the government's approach, namely to prohibit torture, end the practice of extraordinary rendition and end the use of black sites. On January 21, 2009, one day before Obama was scheduled to sign Executive Order 13491 prohibiting the torture of detainees (so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques") and banning the use of CIA black sites, Rizzo contacted the White House counsel, Gregory Craig. Rizzo told Craig that the current language would not allow the CIA to hold people for a day or two in transit during ordinary rendition. The language was changed so that CIA had authority to hold people "on a short-term, transitory basis."

After the release of the Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture on December 9, 2014, Rizzo admitted that the CIA did engage in torture, which he defined as practices not authorized by legal memos sent to him by the Justice Department.

In 2015, Human Rights Watch called for the investigation of Rizzo "for conspiracy to torture as well as other crimes."

Videotapes of early interrogation sessions at black site

Main article: 2005 CIA interrogation tapes destruction

In early 2005, White House Counsel Harriet Miers told Rizzo not to destroy the tapes without checking with the White House first. Jose A. Rodriguez Jr., the chief of the Directorate of Operations, sent a cable to the CIA's Bangkok station ordering the destruction of the tapes on November 8, 2005. Rodriguez informed Goss and Rizzo of the destruction on November 10.

Drone strike targeting

See also: Drone attacks in Pakistan

Rizzo signed off on all CIA-directed drone strikes from the start of the program soon after September 11, 2001 until his retirement in October 2009. He says he saw one "request for approval for targeting for lethal operation" per month and that roughly 30 individuals were targeted at any given time.

In July 2011, the human rights group Reprieve and Pakistani lawyers called for the prosecution of Rizzo in Pakistan for murder for approving drone attacks that killed hundreds of people. In April 2015, the Islamabad High Court ordered police to open a criminal case against Rizzo and former CIA Islamabad station chief Jonathan Bank for murder, conspiracy, terrorism and waging war against Pakistan.

In November 2011, the National Journal cited unnamed sources in reporting that the Department of Justice had opened an investigation of Rizzo for improperly disclosing classified information about the CIA drone program. The probe was first opened by Rizzo's former office, the General Counsel of the CIA, in March 2011 after a detailed interview Rizzo gave Newsweek. The General Counsel's office forwarded its collection of evidence to the DOJ that spring.

Personal life

Rizzo's first marriage was to Priscilla Walton Layton. Together, they had a son named James. After their divorce, Rizzo married Sharon Knight in 1993. They remained married for 28 years until her death in April 2021.

Rizzo died on August 6, 2021, at his home in Washington, D.C., following a heart attack, aged 73.

Works

References

  1. Rizzo, John (2014). Company Man: Thirty Years of Controversy and Crisis in the CIA. New York: Scribner. p. 32. ISBN 978-1-4516-7393-7.
  2. ^ Mazzetti, Mark (June 20, 2007). "Nominee for C.I.A. Counsel Offers Few Details in His Senate Confirmation Hearing". The New York Times. Retrieved October 6, 2011.
  3. Talev, Margaret; Taylor, Marisa (April 16, 2009). "Bush-era interrogations: From waterboarding to forced nudity". McClatchy. Retrieved October 6, 2011.
  4. ^ Priest, Dana; Arkin, William M. (September 6, 2011). Inside the CIA's "Kill List". Little, Brown. ISBN 978-0-316-18221-8. Retrieved October 6, 2011. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  5. Rizzo, John A. (March 30, 2012). "The CIA-Congress War". Defining Ideas. Archived from the original on April 1, 2012.
  6. ^ Roberts, Sam (August 12, 2021). "John Rizzo, C.I.A. Lawyer Who Sanctioned Waterboarding, Dies at 73". The New York Times. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
  7. ^ Smith, Harrison (August 12, 2021). "John Rizzo, CIA lawyer who approved torture program, dies at 73". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
  8. Rizzo, John (2014). Company Man: Thirty Years of Controversy and Crisis in the CIA. New York: Scribner. pp. 32–37. ISBN 978-1-4516-7393-7.
  9. ^ Miller, Greg (June 29, 2009). "John Rizzo: The most influential career lawyer in CIA history". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  10. ^ Mckelvey, Tara (February 13, 2011). "Inside the Killing Machine". Newsweek. Retrieved March 3, 2016.
  11. ^ Rizzo, John (2014). Company Man: Thirty Years of Controversy and Crisis in the CIA. New York: Scribner. p. 38. ISBN 978-1-4516-7393-7.
  12. Hattem, Julian (June 9, 2015). "A lawyer's spy legacy". The Hill.
  13. DeYoung, Karen (June 20, 2007). "Senators Question CIA Nominee on Torture". Washington Post. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  14. Priest, Dana (December 30, 2005). "Covert CIA Program Withstands New Furor". Washington Post. Retrieved October 13, 2011.
  15. Warrick, Joby (September 13, 2007). "Senate Intelligence Panel Seeks CIA Nominee's Withdrawal". Washington Post. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  16. Hentoff, Nat (August 21, 2007). "History Will Not Absolve Us". Village Voice. Retrieved October 13, 2011.
  17. Mazzetti, Mark (September 26, 2007). "Nominee for C.I.A. Counsel Withdraws". The New York Times. Retrieved October 13, 2011.
  18. Landay, Jonathan S. (July 27, 2013). "U.S. allowed Italian kidnap prosecution to shield higher-ups, ex-CIA officer says". McClatchy Washington Bureau. Archived from the original on January 22, 2016.
  19. "Watching 'Zero Dark Thirty' with the CIA: Separating fact from fiction". American Enterprise Institute. January 29, 2013. Retrieved August 18, 2021.
  20. "OPERATIONAL ISSUES PERTAINING TO THE USE OF PHYSICAL/PSYCHOLIGCAL (sic) COERCION IN INTERROGATION" (PDF). JPRA. Retrieved October 24, 2011 – via Washington Post.
  21. Finn, Peter; Warrick, Joby (April 25, 2009). "In 2002, Military Agency Warned Against 'Torture'; Extreme Duress Could Yield Unreliable Information, It Said". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
  22. United States Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (July 29, 2009). OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY'S REPORT OF INVESTIGATION: THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL'S MEMORANDA ON ISSUES RELATING TO THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY'S USE OF "ENHANCED INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES" ON SUSPECTED TERRORISTS (PDF) (Report). United States Department of Justice. pp. 29–30. Retrieved December 2, 2015. In his OPR interview, Chertoff stated that he told the group that in his view, it would not be possible for the Department to provide an advance declination. Rizzo confirmed, in his interview, that Chertoff flatly refused to provide any form of advance declination to the CIA.
  23. ^ "No More Excuses: A Roadmap to Justice for CIA Torture". hrw.org. Human Rights Watch. December 2015. Retrieved December 2, 2015.
  24. Bybee, Jay S. (August 1, 2002). "Memorandum for John Rizzo" (PDF). ACLU. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 3, 2011. Retrieved October 19, 2011.
  25. Warrick, Joby; Finn, Peter (April 22, 2009). "Harsh Tactics Readied Before Their Approval". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 19, 2011.
  26. Rizzo, John (January 7, 2014). "CIA Lawyer: Waterboarding Wasn't Torture Then And Isn't Torture Now". Morning Edition (Interview). Interviewed by Renée Montagne. NPR. Retrieved April 20, 2015.
  27. Strobel, Warren P. (June 17, 2008). "CIA advised military on questioning at Guantanamo". McClatchy. Retrieved October 6, 2011.
  28. Miller, Greg; Meyer, Josh (April 17, 2009). "Obama assures intelligence officials they won't be prosecuted over interrogations". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 19, 2011.
  29. Bradbury, Steven G. (May 10, 2005). "Memorandum for John Rizzo" (PDF). ACLU. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 6, 2011. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
  30. Bradbury, Steven G. (May 10, 2005). "Memorandum for John Rizzo" (PDF). ACLU. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 12, 2011. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
  31. Bradbury, Steven G. (May 30, 2005). "Memorandum for John Rizzo" (PDF). ACLU. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 12, 2011. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
  32. Smith, R. Jeffrey (May 10, 2009). "Hill Panel Reviewing CIA Tactics". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 19, 2011.
  33. Johnston, David; Mazzetti, Mark (August 12, 2009). "A Window Into C.I.A.'s Embrace of Secret Jails". The New York Times. Retrieved October 19, 2011.
  34. Linzer, Dafna; Kessler, Glenn (September 8, 2006). "Decision to Move Detainees Resolved Two-Year Debate Among Bush Advisers". Washington Post. Retrieved October 13, 2011.
  35. "Memorandum for John A. Rizzo". United States Department of Justice. July 20, 2007. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
  36. Becker, Jo; Shane, Scott (May 29, 2012). "Secret 'Kill List' Proves a Test of Obama's Principles and Will". The New York Times. Retrieved January 4, 2013.
  37. Ashtari, Shadee (December 10, 2014). "Former CIA General Counsel John Rizzo Admits CIA Carried Out Unauthorized 'Torture'". Huffington Post. Retrieved December 16, 2014.
  38. ^ Apuzzo, Matt; Goldman, Adam (July 25, 2010). "Key omission in memo to destroy CIA terror tapes". Seattle Times. Associated Press. Retrieved October 14, 2011.
  39. Mazzetti, Mark; Shane, Scott (February 20, 2008). "Tape Inquiry: Ex-Spymaster in the Middle". New York Times. Retrieved October 13, 2011.
  40. Beaumont, Peter (July 16, 2011). "Campaigners seek arrest of former CIA legal chief over Pakistan drone attacks". The Guardian. Retrieved October 25, 2011.
  41. "Pakistani Drone Victims and Families Seek Arrest Warrant for Former CIA Counsel John Rizzo". Center for Constitution Rights. July 19, 2011. Retrieved October 25, 2011.
  42. Hussain, Murtaza (December 15, 2011). "Pakistan's legal fight to end the drone war". Al Jazeera. Retrieved December 16, 2011.
  43. Toppa, Sabrina (April 16, 2015). "Pakistan Could End Up Charging CIA Officials With Murder Over Drone Strikes". Time. Retrieved August 18, 2021.
  44. ^ Ambinder, Marc; Dreazen, Yochi J (November 10, 2011). "Former Top CIA Lawyer Under Investigation". National Journal. Archived from the original on November 12, 2011. Retrieved November 28, 2011.

External links

Categories: