Misplaced Pages

Jones v Lipman

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Jones v Lipman case law
CourtHigh Court
Full case name Concept: Court may lift the corporate veil in some circumstances.one of the example is this JONES VS LIPMAN CASE LAW .
Citation 1 WLR 832
Keywords
Lifting the veil

Jones v Lipman 1 WLR 832 is a UK company law case concerning piercing the corporate veil. It exemplifies the principal case in which the veil will be lifted, that is, when a company is used as a "mere facade" concealing the "true facts", which essentially means it is formed to avoid a pre-existing obligation.

Facts

Mr Lipman contracted to sell a house at 3 Fairlawn Avenue, Chiswick, Middlesex (now Ealing W4), to Mr Jones for £5,250. He changed his mind and refused to complete. To try to avoid a specific performance order, he conveyed it to a company formed for that purpose alone, which he alone owned and controlled.

Judgment

Russell J ordered specific performance against Mr Lipman and formed company.

The defendant company is the creature of the first defendant, a device and a sham, a mask which he holds before his face in an attempt to avoid recognition by the eye of equity.

See also

Corporate personality cases
Case of Sutton's Hospital (1612) 77 ER 960
Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd UKHL 1
Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd AC 619
Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne Ch 935
Lee v Lee's Air Farming Ltd UKPC 33
Jones v Lipman 1 WLR 832
Tunstall v Steigmann 2 QB 593
Littlewoods Mail Order Stores v IRC 1 WLR 1214
Wallersteiner v Moir 1 WLR 991
DHN Ltd v Tower Hamlets LBC 1 WLR 852
Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional Council UKHL 5
Ord v Belhaven Pubs Ltd EWCA Civ 243
Lubbe v Cape Plc UKHL 41
Gencor ACP Ltd v Dalby EWHC 1560 (Ch)
Trustor AB v Smallbone (No 2) EWHC 703 (Ch)
Chandler v Cape plc EWCA Civ 525
Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd UKSC 34
VTB Capital plc v Nutritek Int Corp UKSC 5
Lungowe v Vedanta Resources plc UKSC 20
Rome II Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 arts 1(2)(d) and 4
see UK company law

Notes

References

Categories: