Misplaced Pages

Knowledge equity

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Concept in social science

Knowledge equity is a social science concept referring to social change concerning expanding what is valued as knowledge and how communities may have been excluded from this discourse through imbalanced structures of power and privilege.

History

Knowledge equity developed from the discipline of knowledge management, and referred to the knowledge measurement process where tacit or subjective information is included to more traditional structures of information management. This developed into ways of applying a valuation to knowledge, including both those who know and the processes involving accessing, making sense of, and organizing it. The connection with accessing various areas of knowledge creation are often connected to open access publications, allowing equitable access to those who may need.

Access to knowledge and beliefs about what counts for knowledge has continued to shift within the social sciences, leading to a recognition that those who control what counts as knowledge and how that influences hierarchy and knowledge imbalance. Acknowledging beliefs that some forms of knowledge may be perceived to be better than others establishes an inequity and lack of justice for those who are excluded from systems that privilege discursive knowledge over other forms. The Wikimedia Foundation has identified knowledge equity as a key element toward its strategic direction for an ecosystem of open and inclusive knowledge, where everybody has the access to create and consume knowledge. This has been connected with education as a social strategy for expanding knowledge equity.

Challenges

Challenges to this notion includes who is involved in the discourse where knowledge is understood and accepted, how tacit and explicit knowledge interact and get integrated into the larger systems that value multiple perspectives, and difficulties expanding beyond language and cultural limitations on knowledge assumptions. The challenge for social movements to expand entrenched beliefs related to open and free knowledge in a politicized society involves social justice challenges in practice.

References

  1. Glazer, Rashi (1998). "Measuring the Knower: Towards a Theory of Knowledge Equity". California Management Review. 40 (3): 175–194. doi:10.2307/41165949. ISSN 0008-1256. JSTOR 41165949. S2CID 154938071.
  2. Baskerville, Richard; Dulipovici, Alina (2006). "The theoretical foundations of knowledge management". Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 4 (2): 83–105. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500090. ISSN 1477-8238. S2CID 10908444.
  3. Matheka, Duncan Mwangangi; Nderitu, Joseph; Mutonga, Daniel; Otiti, Mary Iwaret; Siegel, Karen; Demaio, Alessandro Rhyll (2014-04-09). "Open access: academic publishing and its implications for knowledge equity in Kenya". Globalization and Health. 10 (1): 26. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-10-26. ISSN 1744-8603. PMC 4046522. PMID 24716579.
  4. Jaffe, JoAnn (2017). "Knowledge Equity is Social Justice: Engaging a Practice Theory Perspective of Knowledge for Rural Transformation: Knowledge Equity is Social Justice". Rural Sociology. 82 (3): 391–410. doi:10.1111/ruso.12143.
  5. "Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20 - Meta". meta.wikimedia.org. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  6. "How Misplaced Pages Faces Emerging Knowledge with Collective Capital". Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly. 2020-02-14. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  7. ^ "Promoting Knowledge Equity". Wikimedia Foundation. 2020-07-14. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  8. Representation : cultural representations and signifying practices. Hall, Stuart, 1932-2014., Open University. London: Sage in association with the Open University. 1997. ISBN 0-7619-5431-7. OCLC 36566982.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  9. Nonaka, Ikujiro (1994). "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation". Organization Science. 5 (1): 14–37. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14. ISSN 1047-7039. JSTOR 2635068.
  10. Ma, Ji (2023-09-30). "Neutral, Non-Disruptive, and Native: Why Do Chinese Nonprofit Scholars Cite English Articles?". Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 53 (4): 1028–1056. doi:10.1177/08997640231196892. ISSN 0899-7640.
  11. Anthony-Stevens, Vanessa; Matsaw Jr, Sammy L. (2020). "The productive uncertainty of indigenous and decolonizing methodologies in the preparation of interdisciplinary STEM researchers". Cultural Studies of Science Education. 15 (2): 595–613. Bibcode:2020CSSE...15..595A. doi:10.1007/s11422-019-09942-x. ISSN 1871-1502. S2CID 255167486.
  12. Harrison, Stephen (2020-06-09). "How Misplaced Pages Became a Battleground for Racial Justice". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
Categories: