Misplaced Pages

Kucana v. Holder

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
2010 United States Supreme Court case
Kucana v. Holder
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 20, 2010
Full case nameKucana v. Holder
Citations558 U.S. 233 (more)
Holding
The statute that makes certain discretionary determinations of the Attorney General immune to judicial review does not allow the Attorney General to declare determinations discretionary and immune to review via regulations.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Case opinions
MajorityGinsberg
ConcurrenceAlito
Laws applied
8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii)

Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the statute that makes certain discretionary determinations of the attorney general immune to judicial review does not allow the attorney general to declare determinations discretionary and immune to review via regulations.

References

  1. Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010).
  2. "Scope of IIRIRA's jurisdictional bar". SCOTUSblog. 2010-01-20. Retrieved 2024-10-30.

External links

Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: