Misplaced Pages

Land letter

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Christian support for the 2003 Iraq war
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Land letter" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources.
Find sources: "Land letter" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Richard D. Land
Bill Bright

The Land letter was a letter sent to U.S. President George W. Bush by five evangelical Christian leaders on October 3, 2002, outlining their support for a just war pre-emptive invasion of Iraq. As its foundation for support, the letter refers to the "criteria of just war theory as developed by Christian theologians in the late fourth and early fifth centuries A.D." The letter was written by Richard D. Land, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention. It was co-signed by:

The letter asserted that a pre-emptive invasion of Iraq met the criteria of traditional 'just war' theory because:

  • such an action would be defensive
  • the intent is found to be just and noble. The United States does not intend to 'destroy, conquer, or exploit Iraq'
  • it is a last resort because Saddam Hussein had a record of attacking his neighbors, of the 'headlong pursuit and development of biochemical and nuclear weapons of mass destruction' and their use against his own people, and harboring Al-Qaeda in Iraq terrorists
  • it is authorized by a legitimate authority, namely the United States
  • it has limited goals
  • it has reasonable expectation of success
  • non-combatant immunity would be observed
  • it meets the criteria of proportionality—the human cost on both sides would be justified by the intended outcome

See also

References

  1. ^ Stephen R. Rock (2011). Faith and Foreign Policy: The Views and Influence of U.S. Christians and Christian Organizations. Continuum. ISBN 9781441166845.

External links

Categories: