Misplaced Pages

In laser science, laser beam quality defines aspects of the beam illumination pattern and the merits of a particular laser beam's propagation and transformation properties (space-bandwidth criterion). By observing and recording the beam pattern, for example, one can infer the spatial mode properties of the beam and whether or not the beam is being clipped by an obstruction; By focusing the laser beam with a lens and measuring the minimum spot size, the number of times diffraction limit or focusing quality can be computed.

Laser beam quality studies commenced in the 1960s, following the discovery of the laser. The M (mode) factor was introduced to experimentally measure the presence of higher-order modes within a Gaussian-like beam. In early 1970, Larry Marshall noted, 'Despite variations of intensity cross sections from gaussian shape, it is still convenient to define beam diameter as M times the 1/e^2 diameter of the equivalent gaussian mode'. Anthony E. Siegman significantly advanced this formalism, providing a method that could be measured and used to compare different beams, independent of wavelength. The factor is now called beam propagation ratio (M), and it is closely related to the beam parameter product. While the M factor does not give detail on the spatial characteristics of the beam, it does indicate how close it is to being a fundamental-mode Gaussian beam. It also determines the smallest spot size for the beam, as well as the beam divergence. M can also give an indication of beam distortions due to, for example, power-induced thermal lensing in the laser gain medium, since it will increase.

There are some limitations to the M parameter as a simple quality metric. It can be difficult to measure accurately, and factors such as background noise can create large errors in M. Beams with power well out in the "tails" of the distribution have M much larger than one would expect. In theory, an idealized tophat laser beam has infinite M, although this is not true of any physically realizable tophat beam. For a pure Bessel beam, one cannot even compute M.

The definition of "quality" also depends on the application. While a high-quality single-mode Gaussian beam (M close to unity) is optimum for many applications, for other applications a uniform multimode tophat beam intensity distribution is required. An example is laser surgery.

Power-in-the-bucket and Strehl ratio are two other attempts to define beam quality. Both these methods use a laser beam profiler to measure how much power is delivered to a given area. There is also no simple conversion between M, power-in-the-bucket, and Strehl ratio.

M definitions

The equation for the divergence of a pure Gaussian TEM₀₀ unfocused beam propagating through space is given by

${\displaystyle \Theta _{00}={4\lambda \over \pi D_{00}}}$, (1)

where D₀₀ is the diameter of the beam waist, and λ is the wavelength. Higher mode beams often start with a larger beam waist, D₀, and/or have a faster divergence Θ₀. In this case Equation (1) becomes

${\displaystyle \Theta _{0}=M^{2}{4\lambda \over \pi D_{0}}}$, (2)

where Θ₀ and D₀ are the divergence and waist of a higher mode beam and M is greater than 1 and is named the "Beam Propagation Ratio" per the ISO 11146 standard. When a Gaussian laser beam is focused, the focused spot diameter is defined by

${\displaystyle d_{00}={4\lambda f \over \pi D_{00}}}$, (3)

where d₀₀ is the ideal focused spot diameter, f is the focal length of the focusing lens, and D₀₀ is the input beam waist and is placed one focal length from the lens as shown in the figure. However, when a multimode beam is focused, Equation (3) becomes

${\displaystyle d_{0}=M^{2}{4\lambda f \over \pi D_{0}}}$. (4)

M measurement

M cannot be determined from a single beam profile measurement. The ISO/DIS 11146 define that M should be calculated from a series of measurements as shown in the figure below. M is measured on real beams by focusing the beam with a fixed position lens of known focal length, and then measuring the characteristics of the beam waist and divergence. These measurements can be taken with a laser beam profiler.

The multiple measurements ensure that the minimum beam diameter is found and enable a "curve fit" that improves the accuracy of the calculation by minimizing measurement error.

References

1. Laser Beam Quality Metrics by T. Sean Ross
2. Marshall, Larry, "Applications a la mode," Laser Focus, April 1971
3. Siegman, Anthony E. (February 5, 1993). Bhowmik, Anup (ed.). "Defining, measuring, and optimizing laser beam quality". Proc. SPIE 1868, Laser Resonators and Coherent Optics: Modeling, Technology, and Applications. Laser Resonators and Coherent Optics: Modeling, Technology, and Applications. 2: 2. Bibcode:1993SPIE.1868....2S. doi:10.1117/12.150601. S2CID 73623358.
4. Siegman, A. E. (October 1997). "How to (Maybe) Measure Laser Beam Quality". CiteSeerX 10.1.1.177.3400. Tutorial presentation at the Optical Society of America Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California
5. Borghi, R.; Santarsiero, M. (March 1, 1997). "M factor of Bessel–Gauss beams" (PDF). Optics Letters. 22 (5): 262–264. Bibcode:1997OptL...22..262B. doi:10.1364/ol.22.000262. PMID 18183169.
6. Fry, Constance L.; Faulkner., Alan R. (eds.). Current Concepts in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Oculoplastic Surgery.
7. ISO 11146:2005(E), "Lasers and laser-related equipment — Test methods for laser beam widths, divergence angles and beam propagation ratios".
8. G. Langer et al., A webcam in Bayer-mode as a light beam profiler for the near infra-red, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 51 (2013) 571–575

• Laser science