Misplaced Pages

During the Second World War, the British Army maintained and created several mechanised, motorised, and horse-based brigades that were not infantry-based. These mobile forces consisted of battalions and regiments, and were under the command of a brigadier. Brigades could be assigned to a division or operate as an independent formation assigned to a corps headquarters or higher. At the start of the war, in September 1939, the British Army had seven armoured brigades, five tank brigades and one support group (a mixed arms formation assigned to armoured divisions). Numerous armoured and tank brigades were raised, renamed, and disbanded during the war. The army also formed eight support groups, three brigades of cavalry, three brigades equipped with armoured cars and two brigades aimed at grouping divisional cavalry regiments.

The nomenclature of the units assigned to brigades varied at the start of the war. The armoured brigade was the primary force within an armoured division. It was to consist of regiments of fast moving cruiser tanks, prepared to exploit gaps in an opponent's front line and also assigned to engage and destroy opposing armoured forces. These brigades also had an integrated battalion of motorised infantry. Tank brigades, with no integrated infantry support, were to consist of battalions of heavily armoured infantry tanks that would support infantry divisions and for breakthrough operations. However, brigades could be outfitted with whatever was available. In May 1940, nomenclature was standardised in the Royal Armoured Corps and battalion titles were dropped, all units becoming regiments. Starting in 1942, armoured brigades were increasingly equipped with American-supplied medium tanks instead of cruisers. In 1945, all tank brigades were renamed armoured brigades, removing the distinction between titles.

Background

By the 1930s, the British Army had identified four required tank types: the light, the medium, the cruiser, and the infantry tank. Each would be utilised in a particular and separate role from the others. Because of research and development issues, the medium tank concept was dropped and subsumed by the work that proceeded on cruiser tanks. This distinction between tanks and their roles shaped how brigades were named and what their function would be. The armoured brigade was to be equipped with cruiser tanks, while the tank brigade would be equipped with infantry tanks. Irrespective of the different roles, all brigades were commanded by a brigadier.

British tank doctrine stated that infantry tank-equipped brigades would support infantry divisions in penetrating the enemy's defensive line. Cruiser tank-equipped brigades would exploit any gap created. Light tanks were intended for reconnaissance work. In the 1930s, the active British models were only equipped with machine guns. The cruiser was to be more heavily armoured in comparison (but not so armoured that it would be detrimental to its speed), faster, and equipped with machine guns and an anti-tank gun. In addition to being used to exploit holes in the enemy line, the doctrine called for the cruiser to engage and destroy opposing armoured forces. The infantry tank was to be the most heavily armoured of the three categories. It was slower, and was intended to work alongside infantry forces.

At the beginning of the Second World War, in 1939, regiments of mechanised cavalry were intended to be assigned to the armoured brigades and equipped with cruisers. The battalions of the Royal Tank Regiment were intended to be assigned to tank brigades, and would be equipped with infantry tanks. In May 1940, the Royal Armoured Corps (the parent organisation that administered all armoured units) standardised the nomenclature around the 'cavalry' tradition. Thereafter, the term battalion was dropped, and the Royal Tank Regiment units were known only as regiments. A brigade would generally be assigned three battalions or regiments. In 1945, an additional standardisation move took place, eliminating the armour and tank brigade difference with the latter being redesignated as armoured brigades.

Real-life conditions did not follow the ideal practice laid out above. For example, cavalry and Royal Tank Regiment units were assigned to the 1st Armoured Brigade in 1940. They were equipped with a mix of cruisers and light tanks. In 1941, elements of the 3rd Armoured Brigade were equipped with captured Italian M13/40 medium tanks because of the lack of available British models. After the implementation of lend-Lease, American tanks arrived. This resulted in the 4th Armoured Brigade being outfitted with the American M3 Stuart light tanks, which were equipped with a machine gun and an anti-tank cannon. During 1942, the 23rd Armoured Brigade was equipped with Valentine infantry tanks, while the 9th Armoured Brigade was outfitted with a mix of cruiser and American medium tanks.

In 1943, United States Lieutenant General Brehon B. Somervell, head of the Army Service Forces that oversaw the US logistical efforts and lend lease shipments, argued for the United Kingdom to cease domestic tank production and rely solely on American. Somervell reasoned that British tanks were inferior to the M4 Sherman medium tank, and that this would free up British factory space particularly for trucks, machinery, and trains (as British demands for these items via lend-lease had increased). British tank production was reduced, but domestic construction was maintained. By mid-1944, the majority of armoured brigades were equipped with the Sherman, as a result of British cruiser production being unable to meet the numbers required of the Royal Armoured Corps. The lack of quality and reliability, among the British designs, was also a factor in the increased use of American models. Of the nine British armoured brigades deployed to France, in 1944 as part of the Northwest Europe campaign, only the 22nd Armoured Brigade, of the 7th Armoured Division, was primarily equipped with British tanks (the new Cromwell). The number of brigades equipped with British tanks, in northwest Europe, doubled over the winter of 1944/45. In October 1944, the 29th Armoured Brigade, of the 11th Armoured Division, was selected to be re-equipped with the new British Comet tank. The process was started in December, but delayed through to January 1945 as a result of the Battle of the Bulge.

Simultaneously, in September and October, the US reduced the number of medium tanks that were to be delivered to the British Army. By December, as a result of decreased US tank production along with an increased need for medium tanks due to losses, the US suspended tank deliveries. The US Army, which lacking substantial reserves of Sherman tanks in Europe, had to obtain them from the extensive reserve that the British Army had accumulated. To build-up an adequate ongoing reserve for the US Army, the majority of Sherman tanks that were to be delivered to the British Army in 1945 were reallocated. The British had requested 4,000 Shermans and 1,150 of the new M26 Pershings. As a result of the shift in the American priority to build-up its own forces, this rendered the British order meaningless. Token deliveries of Sherman tanks were made, but 1945 saw the British realisation that they could no longer count on abundant American tank deliveries in order to maintain their own armoured forces.

Armoured

The armoured brigade was the primary formation within an armoured division. At the start of the Second World War, an armoured division was to consist of two armoured brigades: a heavy and a light. The war establishment called for the former to be equipped with 147 'heavy cruisers', such as the Cruiser Mk II and the Cruiser Mk III. The light brigade was to be 174 tanks strong and consist of a mix of light tanks and 'light cruiser' tanks such as the Cruiser Mk I. A further 20 tanks were to be assigned to the brigade headquarters. In April 1940, the light and heavy distinctions were dropped, and each brigade was to be equipped with three armoured regiments, each consisting of 52 tanks. In practice, however, brigades were equipped with what was available. In 1940, for example, the two brigades of the 2nd Armoured Division were equipped with a total of 256 light tanks and 54 cruisers. From October 1940 onwards, each armoured brigade was to include an integrated battalion of motorised infantry. For the brigades assigned to an armoured division, these battalions were to be assigned from the division's support groups that contained the infantry and supporting arms. Implementation of this change was not universal. For example, the 2nd Armoured Division's 1st Armoured Brigade received an infantry battalion in February 1941, whereas the division's 3rd Armoured Brigade did not receive one at all. Likewise, the 7th Armoured Division's 4th Armoured Brigade did not receive integrated infantry support until February 1942, while its 7th Armoured Brigade received an infantry battalion in April 1941. The majority of brigades formed after October 1940, however, included the required infantry battalion from the date of their creation.

As the war progressed, the war establishment diverged for those brigades based in the United Kingdom compared to those engaged in the Western Desert campaign in North Africa. By 1942, the armoured divisions in North Africa were to consist of one armoured brigade that had been reorganised as a brigade group; a formation that contained its own supporting arms, such as engineers and artillery. The arrival of American tanks in Egypt also resulted in an equipment difference. British-based brigades consisted of only cruisers, while those in Egypt were equipped with a mix of cruisers and American light and medium tanks. By the middle of 1942, the brigade group concept had been abandoned. The supporting arms were removed from the brigades and returned to being divisional assets. Each brigade, in the Middle East, was then to consist of three regiments of 52 tanks. The brigade headquarters was also assigned eight additional tanks, and the brigade was to include four tanks equipped with anti-aircraft guns. In 1943, the divisional armoured brigades were standardised for those abroad and those based in the United Kingdom. Each brigade was to have three regiments of 55 cruisers/medium tanks, six tanks equipped with howitzers capable of firing smoke and high explosive rounds in a close support role, eight anti-aircraft tanks, and ten tanks assigned to the brigade headquarters. From March 1944, the brigade was allocated 33 light tanks for reconnaissance, and eight tanks outfitted as artillery observation posts. In 1945, the brigade headquarters was reduced to seven tanks.

In addition to the armoured brigades assigned to a division, the British Army utilised several brigades that operated as independent formations. In the early stages of the war, this could range from being assigned to provide armour support to an expeditionary force, such as the 1st Armoured Brigade during the Battle of Greece, to being used for independent tasks such as the 9th Armoured Brigade during the Second Battle of El Alamein. During the Western Desert campaign, the main function of these independent formations was to replace brigades within a division that had suffered heavy losses; to reinforce an armoured division to increase its tank strength temporarily; or to provide tank support to infantry formations by being temporarily assigned to them. These formations were also to be structured the same way as those brigades assigned to armoured divisions. In preparation for the Allied invasion of France in 1944 (Operation Overlord), the British Army intended to prepare eight tank brigades to provide infantry support. These brigades were to be assigned to corps or army level commands, and then allocated to infantry divisions as needed. As tank production could not meet the numbers required, five of these brigades were organised as independent armoured brigades and equipped with M4 Shermans. General Bernard Montgomery, commander of the 21st Army Group to which these brigades were assigned, had advocated for a Universal Tank that combined the aspects of the infantry and cruiser tanks. In the interim, he believed that the M4 Sherman was the closest tool for the universal tank role. He made clear that he saw no distinction between armoured and tank brigades, and would use either as he best decided and not via the previously defined roles that they had been given. The lack of enforced doctrine allowed these armoured brigades to implement infantry support as they saw fit.

In 1943, the 79th Armoured Division was converted to develop specialised tanks for the particular problems of a amphibious landing on the defended French coast. It was deployed to France in June 1944, as part of Operation Overlord, and fielded two armoured brigades. These brigades were equipped with the Churchill infantry tank and M4 Shermans. These tanks had been modified to tackle various obstacles that British forces would face when conducting the Normandy landings, and later fought in subsequent assault operations. These modifications included mine-clearing flails, modified Churchill tanks dubbed Armoured Vehicle Royal Engineers that were equipped with an anti-fortification weapon and could carry fascines or other bridging equipment, and flamethrowers. The units of the brigade would be assigned to formations that needed their assistance, and the brigadier would act as an advisor in their use.

In January 1945, the British Army decided that all remaining tank brigades would be redesignated as armoured brigades, although they retained their infantry tanks and were not necessarily re-equipped with medium or cruiser tanks as the existing armoured brigades were.

Armoured Reconnaissance

The British Expeditionary Force (BEF) was dispatched to France between 1939 and 1940, and was made up of 'regular' army divisions and divisions from the Territorial Army (TA). The divisions of the regular army differed from their TA counterparts, as they each contained a divisional cavalry regiment. It was a mechanised unit that included 28 light tanks, 44 scout carriers, and had around 480 personnel. Their intended role was to take over the former horse cavalry position of providing reconnaissance and flank protection to the division, as well as holding captured terrain for short periods of time. There was discussion among the BEF staff on how to use these units, and it was intended to remove them from the divisions and assign them as corps-level assets. This project was abandoned in favour of grouping the regiments into two armoured reconnaissance brigades.

The regiments assigned to the 1st Brigade were removed from their divisions and transported to Normandy to conduct training as a cohesive unit. Those assigned to the 2nd Brigade remained with their divisions and under the direct command of their divisional commanders. When Germany invaded Belgium, these regiments led their respective divisions into Belgium and then covered their withdrawal. Those assigned to the 1st Brigade had barely started training as a single formation, and were transported back towards the front to be used as individual reserve units under the direct command of the BEF.

After the Battle of France, the reconnaissance brigade concept was not readopted. New reconnaissance units were formed, which eventually became part of the Reconnaissance Corps, and were assigned to each infantry division. For the armoured divisions, reconnaissance was provided by armoured car regiments. As the war progressed, the latter became an asset of an army corps. Within the armoured division, they were replaced by a medium or cruiser tank-equipped armoured reconnaissance regiments. However, by July 1944, these regiments were largely being used as a regular combat unit rather than for reconnaissance purposes.

Cavalry

The British Army began the war with two cavalry brigades (5th and 6th). Each were made up of three regiments and were part of the Territorial Army's part-time reserve. A third brigade, also of three regiments, was formed after the outbreak of the war. These three brigades were grouped together in the 1st Cavalry Division. The army's doctrine called for the brigades to function as mounted infantry: moving from place to place on horseback, and then dismounting to engage opposing forces with rifles, machine guns, and supported by artillery.

In early 1940, the three brigades left the United Kingdom for France. They then moved across the country to the port of Marseille, where they boarded ships and travelled to Palestine. While based in Palestine, it was intended that all three brigades would be motorised. By May 1941, only the 4th Cavalry Brigade had received enough vehicles for this to happen, as the others had been used as a pool from which to draw materiel for other formations based in the Middle East. The 4th Brigade subsequently fought as a motorised infantry brigade in several campaigns. Two of the brigades, along with the divisional headquarters, were slowly converted into armoured formations as additional equipment arrived in the Middle East.

Motor Machine Gun

In June 1940, the British Army had retreated from mainland Europe following the Battle of France. As a result, the army lost nearly all the tanks it had dispatched. Tank production during 1939 and the opening of 1940 had been low, with most dispatched to either France or to British forces based in North Africa. This resulted in few tanks being available within the United Kingdom when the British Army needed to rearm. The British Expeditionary Force's divisional cavalry, including the 2nd Armoured Reconnaissance Brigade, could not be re-equipped with tanks. Other units, such as the 43rd Royal Tank Regiment, had been based in the United Kingdom since the start of the war and purportedly was an armoured unit, despite it never having been allocated tanks because of the lack of availability. These forces were grouped together and formed into the motor machine gun brigades. The various units were outfitted with a variety of armoured cars (pre-built or improvised) and trucks that had been armed with Vickers Medium Machine Guns, Bren machine guns, and Boys anti-tank rifles. The majority of the brigade's personnel acted as motorised infantry. As new tanks became available, the individual units were re-equipped, and the brigades redesignated.

Support Groups

The support group included the supporting arms that were assigned to an armoured division. The numerical designation of the group corresponded to the armoured division to which it was allocated. Prior to the outbreak of the war, these formations were known as pivot groups. Ideally, each support group would consist of two motorised infantry battalions, as well as artillery, anti-tank, and light anti-aircraft guns. At full strength, the support group would have sixteen 25-pounder field gun-howitzers, twenty-four 2-pounder anti-tank guns, and twenty-four Bofors 40 mm gun anti-aircraft guns. In October 1940, the structure of the support group was changed to remove the two motorised infantry battalions. They were to be transferred to the division's armoured brigades, and were to be replaced by a single infantry battalion within the support group. The 7th Support Group, the only support group that was active at the time of the change and also included infantry, did not abide by the change and maintained two battalions through to November 1941.

British armoured doctrine dictated that the infantry were not to supplement the tanks. Rather, they were to protect them at leaguer, hold a position occupied by the administrative and supply vehicles, or secure a location that the tanks had captured. This idea was not re-examined until after Operation Crusader, which was fought in North Africa and ended in January 1942. Consequently, the support groups were abolished, and the armoured divisions were reorganised around two brigade groups: one composed of three armoured regiments and a motorised infantry battalion, and the other based around three motorised infantry battalions. The change also saw an additional artillery regiment assigned. The units previously assigned to the support groups were either broken-up and allocated to each brigade group or assigned to their own respective command, such as a divisional artillery headquarters. Following the lessons learnt in North Africa, the armoured divisions based within the United Kingdom were also reorganised, but without implementing the use of brigade groups. Despite the authorised change, it took several months for these lessons to be absorbed and the first support groups to be disbanded.

Tank

The tank brigade was an independent formation that would be assigned to a corps level command and be allocated to provide support to an infantry division as the need arose. The brigades were equipped primarily with infantry tanks and would assist the infantry division in penetrating the enemy's defensive line. The intent was that any subsequent gap would then be exploited by the faster moving tanks of an armoured division. In 1942, the British Army experimented with the format of their infantry divisions. Several were converted into "mixed divisions", which saw the removal of one infantry brigade that was replaced with a tank brigade. The concept was deemed unsuccessful and was abandoned the following year.

In 1939, it was intended that each brigade would have 150 infantry and 25 light tanks, with total personnel of around 1,500 men. In 1941, the war establishment of the brigade was changed to 178 tanks and around 1,800 men. The following year, the establishment was further increased to 202 tanks and around 1,900 men. A final organisational change took place in November 1943. Each brigade would have 240 tanks, which included 18 tanks equipped with close support howitzers, 33 light tanks for reconnaissance, 18 tanks equipped with anti-aircraft guns, eight tanks outfitted as artillery observation posts, and three tanks with bridge-laying equipment. In January 1945, the British Army decided that all remaining tank brigades would be redesignated as armoured brigades.

See also

• British Army during the Second World War
• List of British brigades of the Second World War

Notes

Footnotes

1. During the Second World War, the British infantry were completely motorised.
2. The 1st and the 2nd Cavalry Brigades existed until early 1939, when they were renamed as the 1st Light and the 2nd Light Armoured Brigades. During the year, the Cavalry Brigade (Egypt) was redesignated as the 7th Light Armoured Brigade. In early 1939, the 20th Cavalry Brigade was formed and on the outbreak of the war, it as retitled the 20th Light Armoured Brigade.
3. While the British Army abandoned the concept, it was embraced by New Zealand. The 2nd New Zealand Division was reorganised in 1943 as a mixed division of two infantry brigades and one medium tank-equipped armoured brigade, prior to being deployed to the Italian campaign. It maintained this structure through to the end of the war.

Citations

1. ^ Joslen 2003, p. 205.
2. "The British Army in North Africa 1941". Imperial War Museum. Retrieved 20 September 2021.
3. French 2001, p. 38.
4. Buckley 2006, pp. 136, 139.
5. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 4, 138, 192.
6. Joslen 2003, p. 144 ff..
7. ^ French 2001, pp. 37–41.
8. ^ Buckley 2006, p. 139.
9. ^ Playfair et al. 2004, p. 105.
10. Zaloga 2015, pp. 80, 82.
11. ^ The Tank 1960, p. 181.
12. Joslen 2003, p. 144.
13. ^ Newbold 1988, pp. 422, 426.
14. Playfair et al. 2004, p. 3.
15. Playfair et al. 2004, pp. 232, 255.
16. Playfair et al. 2004, pp. 9, 66–67.
17. Coakley & Leighton 1989, pp. 91, 642–643.
18. Buckley 2006, p. 137.
19. Buckley 2006, p. 16.
20. Palamountain 2006, pp. 75–76.
21. Coakley & Leighton 1989, pp. 643–644, 549.
22. ^ Joslen 2003, p. 4.
23. Crow 1972, pp. 82, 286.
24. Joslen 2003, pp. 139, 213.
25. Joslen 2003, pp. 139, 144, 151–154, 158, 162–188, 213.
26. Joslen 2003, pp. 4–7.
27. Joslen 2003, pp. 8–10.
28. Playfair et al. 2004, p. 345.
29. Playfair et al. 2004, p. 79.
30. Playfair et al. 2004, pp. 66–67.
31. Montgomery & Brooks 1991, p. 117.
32. Buckley 2006, pp. 72, 77, 80–81, 113–114.
33. Joslen 2003, pp. 30–32.
34. Buckley 2006, pp. 13, 15.
35. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 192–194.
36. Joslen 2003, pp. 144–145.
37. Joslen 2003, p. 147.
38. Joslen 2003, pp. 148–149.
39. Joslen 2003, pp. 151–152.
40. Joslen 2003, pp. 153–155.
41. ^ Joslen 2003, p. 156.
42. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 157, 197.
43. Joslen 2003, pp. 158–159.
44. Joslen 2003, pp. 160–161.
45. Joslen 2003, pp. 162–163.
46. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 164, 198.
47. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 165, 199.
48. ^ Joslen 2003, p. 166.
49. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 167, 200.
50. Joslen 2003, pp. 168–169.
51. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 170–172, 201.
52. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 173–174, 186–187, 202.
53. Joslen 2003, p. 175.
54. Joslen 2003, pp. 176–177.
55. Joslen 2003, p. 178.
56. Joslen 2003, p. 179.
57. Joslen 2003, p. 180.
58. Joslen 2003, p. 181.
59. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 182, 204.
60. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 183, 206.
61. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 184, 207.
62. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 185, 209.
63. ^ Joslen 2003, p. 186.
64. Joslen 2003, p. 188.
65. Crow 1972, p. 28.
66. Doherty 2006, p. 11.
67. ^ Murland 1943, p. 81.
68. ^ Divisional Reconnaissance Troops 1942, pp. 50–51.
69. French 2001, p. 191.
70. Buckley 2006, pp. 94–95.
71. Joslen 2003, p. 146.
72. Joslen 2003, p. 150.
73. "The Monthly Army List, January 1939". National Library of Scotland. pp. 49, 136., "The Monthly Army List, May 1939". National Library of Scotland. p. 49., and "The Monthly Army List, August 1939 Security Edition". National Library of Scotland. pp. 49, 136.
74. "The Monthly Army List, August 1939 Security Edition". National Library of Scotland. p. 70.
75. "No. 34589". The London Gazette. 13 January 1939. p. 287.
76. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 33, 189–191.
77. French 2001, p. 15.
78. French 2001, pp. 221–222.
79. Joslen 2003, pp. 132–133.
80. Joslen 2003, pp. 189–191.
81. Playfair et al. 2004, p. 187.
82. Joslen 2003, p. 189.
83. Playfair et al. 2004, pp. 249.
84. ^ Joslen 2003, p. 189-191, 54.
85. Fraser 1999, pp. 78, 88.
86. Crow 1972, p. 26; 43rd Royal Tank Regiment 1956, p. 79; Fletcher 1989, p. 38.
87. "Badge, formation, 9th Armoured Division & 1st Motor Machine Gun Brigade". Imperial War Museum. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
88. Joslen 2003, p. 210.
89. Fletcher 1989, p. 38.
90. Joslen 2003, p. 211.
91. Joslen 2003, p. 212.
92. ^ Joslen 2003, pp. 214–222.
93. ^ Bidwell & Graham 2004, p. 176.
94. Joslen 2003, p. 129.
95. ^ Joslen 2003, p. 218.
96. French 2001, p. 42.
97. Joslen 2003, pp. 5–7, 213 ff..
98. French 2001, pp. 224–225.
99. ^ Joslen 2003, p. 214.
100. Joslen 2003, pp. 16, 215.
101. Joslen 2003, p. 217.
102. Forty 2014, p. 21.
103. Joslen 2003, p. 219.
104. ^ Joslen 2003, p. 220.
105. Joslen 2003, p. 222.
106. Playfair et al. 2004, p. 7.
107. Crow 1972, pp. 35–36.
108. Phillips 1957, pp. 33–35.
109. Jackson & Gleave 2004, p. 114.
110. Joslen 2003, pp. 195–196.
111. Joslen 2003, p. 203.
112. Joslen 2003, p. 209.

References

• "43rd Royal Tank Regiment". The Royal Armoured Corps Journal. London: Committee of the Royal Armoured Corps Journal. 1956. pp. 77ff. OCLC 828213850.
• Bidwell, Shelford; Graham, Dominick (2004) . Fire-Power: The British Army Weapons & Theories of War 1904–1945. Barnsley: Pen & Sword Military Classics. ISBN 978-1-84415-216-2.
• Buckley, John (2006) . British Armour in the Normandy Campaign 1944. London: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-41540-773-1.
• Crow, Duncan (1972). British and Commonwealth Armoured Formations (1919-46). AFV/Weapons series. Windsor: Profile Publications Limited. ISBN 978-0-853-83081-8.
• Coakley, Robert W.; Leighton, Richard M. (1989) . The War Department: Global Logistics and Strategy 1943–1945. United States Army in World War II. Washington, D. C.: Center of Military History, United States Army. OCLC 455658983.
• "Divisional Reconnaissance Troops". The Army Quarterly. Vol. 45. London: William Clowes & Sons. 1942. OCLC 56015704.
• Doherty, Richard (2006). None Bolder: The History of the 51st Highland Division in the Second World War. Staplehurst, Kent: Spellmount. ISBN 978-1-86227-317-7.
• Fletcher, David (1989). The Great Tank Scandal: British Armour in the Second World War. Part 1. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office. ISBN 978-0-11290-460-1.
• Forty, George (2014). Desert Rats at War: North Africa, Italy, Northwest Europe. Unidentified: Air Sea Media Services. ISBN 978-0-95769-152-0.
• Fraser, David (1999) . And We Shall Shock Them: The British Army in the Second World War. London: Cassell Military. ISBN 978-0-304-35233-3.
• French, David (2001) . Raising Churchill's Army: The British Army and the War Against Germany 1919–1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19924-630-4.
• Joslen, H. F. (2003) . Orders of Battle: Second World War, 1939–1945. Uckfield, East Sussex: Naval and Military Press. ISBN 978-1-84342-474-1.
• Jackson, William; Gleave, T. P. (2004) . Butler, J. R. M. (ed.). The Mediterranean and Middle East: Victory in the Mediterranean Part III: November 1944 to May 1945. History of the Second World War United Kingdom Military Series. Vol. VI. London: Naval & Military Press. ISBN 978-0-116-30943-3.
• Montgomery, Bernard; Brooks, Stephen (1991). Montgomery and the Eighth Army: A Selection from the Diaries, Correspondence and Other Papers of Field Marshal the Viscount Montgomery of Alamein, August 1942 to December 1943. \Publications of the Army Record Society. Vol. VI. London: Bodley Head for the Army Records Society. ISBN 978-0-37031-723-6.
• Murland, James Robert William (1943). The Royal Armoured Corps. London: Methuen & Co. OCLC 6069216.
• Newbold, David John (1988). British Planning And Preparations To Resist Invasion On Land, September 1939 – September 1940 (PDF) (Ph.D. thesis). London: King's College London. OCLC 556820697.
• Palamountain, Edgar W. I. (2006) . Taurus Pursuant: A History of 11th Armoured Division. Smalldale, Derbyshire: MLRS Books. ISBN 978-1-90569-638-3.
• Phillips, Neville Crompton (1957). Italy: The Sangro to Cassino. The Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War 1939–1945. Vol. I. Wellington: Historical Publications Branch, Department of Internal Affairs. OCLC 1056140680.
• Playfair, I. S. O.; et al. (2004) . Butler, J. R. M. (ed.). The Mediterranean and Middle East: The Early Successes Against Italy (to May 1941). History of the Second World War United Kingdom Military Series. Vol. I. London: Naval & Military Press. ISBN 978-1-84574-065-8.
• Playfair, I. S. O.; et al. (2004) . Butler, J. R. M. (ed.). The Mediterranean and Middle East: The Germans Come to the Help of their Ally (1941). History of the Second World War United Kingdom Military Series. Vol. II. London: Naval & Military Press. ISBN 978-1-84574-066-5.
• Playfair, I. S. O.; et al. (2004) . Butler, J. R. M. (ed.). The Mediterranean and Middle East: British Fortunes Reach their Lowest Ebb (September 1941 to September 1942). History of the Second World War United Kingdom Military Series. Vol. III. London: Naval & Military Press. ISBN 978-1-84574-067-2.
• Playfair, I. S. O.; Molony, C. J. C.; Flynn, F. C. & Gleave, T. P. (2004) . Butler, J. R. M. (ed.). The Mediterranean and Middle East: The Destruction of the Axis Forces in Africa. History of the Second World War United Kingdom Military Series. Vol. IV. London: Naval & Military Press. ISBN 978-1-845-74068-9.
• The Tank. London: Royal Tank Regimental Publications Committee. 1960. OCLC 25275667.
• Zaloga, Steven (2015). Armored Champion: The Top Tanks of World War II. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books. ISBN 978-0-81171-437-2.

Further reading

• Mobile Division Training Pamphlet No. 2: Notes on the Employment of the Tank Brigade 1939 (PDF). London and Beccles, Suffolk: His Majesty's Stationery Office and William Clowes & Sons. 1938.
• Troop Training for Cruiser Tank Troops: Military Training Pamphlet No. 51 (PDF). London: The War Office. 1941.

External links

• "Tank Training". The Vickers MG Collection & Research Association. 4 July 2017. Retrieved 20 September 2021. Blog containing various training material regarding British tank forces

• Lists of military units and formations of World War II
• Lists of British Army units and formations
• Military units and formations of the British Empire in World War II
• United Kingdom in World War II-related lists