Misplaced Pages

Little brown bat
Conservation status
Endangered  (IUCN 3.1)
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Mammalia
Order:	Chiroptera
Family:	Vespertilionidae
Genus:	Myotis
Species:	M. lucifugus
Binomial name
Myotis lucifugus (Le Conte, 1831)
Subspecies
Myotis lucifugus pernox Myotis lucifugus lucifugus Myotis lucifugus alascensis Myotis lucifugus carissima Myotis lucifugus relictus
Distribution of all little brown bat subspecies: M. l. lucifugus (red), M. l. pernox (green), M. l. alascensis (blue), M. l. carissima (yellow), M. l. relictus (gray)
Synonyms
Vespertilio lucifugus Le Conte, 1831

The little brown bat or little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) is an endangered species of mouse-eared microbat found in North America. It has a small body size and glossy brown fur. It is similar in appearance to several other mouse-eared bats, including the Indiana bat, northern long-eared bat, and Arizona myotis, to which it is closely related. Despite its name, the little brown bat is not closely related to the big brown bat, which belongs to a different genus.

Its mating system is polygynandrous, or promiscuous, and females give birth to one offspring annually. The offspring, called pups, are quickly weaned and reach adult size in some dimensions by three weeks old. The little brown bat has a mean lifespan of 6.5 years, though one individual in the wild reached 34 years old. It is nocturnal, foraging for its insect prey at night and roosting in hollow trees or buildings during the day, among less common roost types. It navigates and locates prey with echolocation.

It has few natural predators, but may be killed by raptors such as owls, as well as terrestrial predators such as raccoons. Other sources of mortality include diseases such as rabies and white-nose syndrome. White-nose syndrome has been a significant cause of mortality since 2006, killing over one million little brown bats by 2011. In the Northeastern United States, population loss has been extreme, with surveyed hibernacula (caves used for hibernation) averaging a population loss of 90%.

Humans frequently encounter the little brown bat due to its habit of roosting in buildings. Colonies in buildings are often considered pests because of the production of waste or the concern of rabies transmission. Little brown bats rarely test positive for rabies, however. Some people attempt to attract little brown bats to their property, but not their houses, by installing bat houses.

Taxonomy

The little brown bat was described as a new species in 1831 by American naturalist John Eatton Le Conte. It was initially in the genus Vespertilio, with a binomial of Vespertilio lucifugus, before it was re-categorized as belonging to the Myotis genus. "Myotis" is a Neo-Latin construction, from the Greek "muós (meaning "mouse") and "oûs" (meaning ear), literally translating to "mouse-eared". "Lucifugus" is from Latin "lux" (meaning "light") and "fugere" (meaning "to shun"), literally translating to "light-shunning". The holotype had possibly been collected in Georgia near the Le Conte Plantation near Riceboro, but this has been disputed because the initial record lacked detail on where the specimen was collected.

Within its family, the Vespertilionidae (vesper bats), the little brown bat is a member of the subfamily Myotinae, which contains only the mouse-eared bats of genus Myotis. Based on a 2007 study using mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, it is part of a Nearctic clade of mouse-eared bats. Its sister taxon is the Arizona myotis, M. occultus.

As of 2005, five subspecies of the little brown bat are recognized: M. l. lucifugus, M. l. alascensis, M. l. carissima, M. l. pernox, and M. l. relictus. Formerly, the Arizona myotis and southeastern myotis (M. austroriparius) were also considered subspecies (M. l. occultus and M. l. austroriparius), but both are now recognized as full species. In a 2018 study by Morales and Carstens, they concluded that the five subspecies are independent, paraphyletic lineages, meaning that grouping them together excludes other lineages with the same common ancestor, and therefore each warrant specific status.

Results of one study suggested that the little brown bat can hybridize with Yuma myotis, M. yumanensis. The two species occur in the same area in much of the Western United States, as well as southern British Columbia. The two species are morphologically different throughout most of the range, but in some regions, individuals have been documented that are intermediate in appearance between the two. However, a 1983 study by Herd and Fenton found no morphological, genetic, or ecological evidence to support the notion that the two species hybridize.

Anatomy and physiology

External characteristics

The little brown bat is a small species, with individuals weighing 5.5–12.5 g (0.19–0.44 oz) with a total body length of 8.0–9.5 cm (3.1–3.7 in). Individuals have the lowest weight in the spring as they emerge from hibernation. It has a forearm length of 36–40 mm (1.4–1.6 in) and a wingspan of 22.2–26.9 cm (8.7–10.6 in). It is a sexually dimorphic species, with females larger than males on average. A variety of fur colors is possible, with pelage ranging from pale tan or reddish to dark brown. Its belly fur is a lighter color than its back fur. Its fur is glossy in appearance, though less so on its belly. A variety of pigmentation disorders have been documented in this species, including albinism (total lack of pigment), leucism (partial lack of pigment), and melanism (over-pigmentation).

Head and teeth

It is a diphyodont mammal, meaning that it has two sets of teeth during its lifetime—milk teeth and adult teeth. The dental formula of the milk teeth is 2.1.2.03.1.2.0 for a total of 22 teeth, while that of the adult teeth is 2.1.3.33.1.3.3 for a total of 38 teeth. Newborns ("pups") are born with 20 milk teeth which becomes 22 when the final upper premolars emerge. Pups begin losing milk teeth once they have reached a body length of 55–60 mm (2.2–2.4 in); total loss of milk teeth and emergence of adult teeth is usually complete by the time a juvenile is 80 mm (3.1 in) long.

It has a relatively short snout and a gently sloped forehead. It lacks a sagittal crest, which can be used to distinguish it from the Arizona myotis. Its skull length is 14–16 mm (0.55–0.63 in). The braincase appears nearly circular though somewhat flattened when viewed from the back. Its ears are 11.0–15.5 mm (0.43–0.61 in) long, while the tragi, or cartilaginous flaps that project in front of the ear openings, are 7.0–9.0 mm (0.28–0.35 in) long. The tragi are blunt at the tips and considered of medium length for a mouse-eared bat.

Senses

The little brown bat is dichromatic and its eyesight is likely sensitive to ultraviolet and red light, based on a genetic analysis that discovered that the genes SWS1 and M/LWS were present and functional. Its ability to see ultraviolet light may be useful in capturing insects, as 80% of nocturnal moths' wings reflect UV light. It is unclear if or how seeing red light is advantageous for this species. It is adapted to see best in low-light conditions. It lacks eyeshine.

The little brown bat lacks a vomeronasal organ. Relative to frugivorous bat species such as the Jamaican fruit bat, it has small eyes and a reduced olfactory epithelium. Instead, it has a more sophisticated system of echolocation, suggesting that reliance on echolocation decreases the need for orientation via sight or smell.

Physiology

In fall through spring, the little brown bat enters torpor, a state of decreased physiological activity, daily. Torpor saves energy for the bat when ambient temperatures are below 39 °F (4 °C) throughout the year and 32 °F (0 °C) in the winter; instead of expending energy to maintain a constant body temperature, it allows its body to cool and physiological activity to slow. While in torpor, its heart rate drops from up to 210 beats per minute to as few as 8 beats per minute. The exception to this rule is females at the end of pregnancy, which no longer have the ability to thermoregulate, and therefore must roost in warm places. During daily roosting, it can cope with high levels of water loss of up to 25%.

In the winter time, it enters a prolonged state of torpor known as hibernation. To conserve energy, it limits how frequently it arouses from torpor, with individuals existing in uninterrupted torpor for up to 90 days. Arousal is the most energetically costly phase of torpor, which is why individuals do so infrequently. Despite the energy-saving mechanism of hibernation, individuals lose a quarter of their pre-hibernation body mass during the winter.

Similar species

The little brown bat can be confused with the Indiana bat (M. sodalis) in appearance. The two can be differentiated by the little brown bat's lack of a keeled calcar—the cartilaginous spur on its uropatagium (the flight membrane between its hind legs). While it does have a calcar, that of the little brown bat is not nearly as pronounced. Additionally, the little brown bat can be distinguished by the presence of hairs on its toes and feet that extend beyond the length of the digits. The northern long-eared bat (M. septentrionalis), another similar species, can be distinguished by its much longer ears, and tragi that are long and sharply pointed.

Biology and ecology

Reproduction and life cycle

The little brown bat has a promiscuous mating structure, meaning that individual bats of both sexes mate with multiple partners. It is a seasonal breeder, with mating taking place in the fall before the annual hibernation. As a seasonal breeder, males do not produce sperm year-round; instead, spermatogenesis occurs May through August each year. Throughout the spring and summer, males and females roost separately. In the fall, however, individuals of both sexes will congregate in the same roost in a behavior known as "swarming". Like several other bat species, males of this species exhibit homosexual behaviors, with male bats mating indiscriminately with torpid, roosting bats, regardless of sex.

Although copulation occurs in the fall, fertilization does not occur until the spring due to sperm storage. Gestation proceeds for 50–60 days following fertilization. The litter size is one individual. At birth, pups weigh approximately 2.2 g (0.078 oz) and have a forearm length less than 17.2 mm (0.68 in). While they have a small absolute mass, they are enormous relative to their mothers, weighing up to 30% of her postpartum body weight at birth. Pups' eyes and ears are closed at first, but open within a few hours of birth. They exhibit rapid growth; at around three weeks old, the young start flying, begin the weaning process, and are of a similar size to adults in forearm length but not weight. The young are totally weaned by 26 days old. Females may become sexually mature in the first year of life. Males become sexually mature in their second year.

It is a very long-lived species relative to its body size. In the wild, individuals have been documented living up to 34 years. The average lifespan, however, is around 6.5 years. Males and females have high annual survival rates (probability of surviving another year), though survival rates vary by sex and region. One colony documented in Ontario had a male survival rate of 81.6% and a female survival rate of 70.8%; a colony in southern Indiana had survival rates of 77.1% and 85.7% for males and females, respectively.

Social behavior

The little brown bat is a colonial species, with hibernating colonies consisting of up to 183,500 individuals, though the average colony size is little more than 9,000. Historically, individuals within these colonies were highly aggregated and densely clustered together, though the disease white-nose syndrome is making solitary hibernation more common.

During the spring and summer, maternity colonies of almost all female individuals form. These colonies usually consist of several hundred bats. Outside of these maternity colonies, adult males and non-reproductive females will roost by themselves or in small aggregations. Maternity colonies begin to break apart in late summer.

Diet and foraging

The little brown bat is nocturnal, resting during the day and foraging at night. Individuals typically emerge from their roosts at dusk, foraging for 1.5–3 hours before stopping to roost. A second foraging bout usually occurs later in the night, ending at dawn.

Based on documenting one individual flying in a wind tunnel, it flies at approximately 5.5 km/h (3.4 mph); this increased to 8.9 km/h (5.5 mph) when flying over the surface of water. Home range size is variable; in one study of 22 females in Canada, pregnant females had an average home range of 30.1 hectares (74 acres) and lactating females had an average of 17.6 hectares (43 acres).

It produces calls that are high intensity frequency modulated (FM) and that last from less than one millisecond (ms) to about 5 ms and have a sweep rate of 80–40 kHz, with most of their energy at 45 kHz. Individuals emit approximately 20 calls per second when in flight.

It consumes a variety of arthropod species, including insects and spiders. Prey species include beetles, flies, mayflies, true bugs, ants, moths, lacewings, stoneflies, and caddisflies. It also consumes mosquitoes, with one study documenting that, across twelve colonies in Wisconsin, 71.9% of all little brown bat guano (feces) samples contained mosquito DNA.

During late pregnancy, when energetic demands are high, females consume around 5.5 g (0.19 oz) of insects nightly, or 1.3 g (0.046 oz) of insects per hour of foraging. With an average body mass of 9.0 g (0.32 oz), that means that pregnant females consume 61% of their body weight nightly. Energetic demands during lactation are even higher, though, with females consuming 6.7 g (0.24 oz) of insects nightly, or 1.7 g (0.060 oz) of insects per hour of foraging. Because lactating females have an average mass of 7.9 g (0.28 oz), this means that they consume nearly 85% of their body weight nightly. As the pup grows, lactation requires more and more energy; at the predicted lactation peak of 18 days old, a female would have to consume 9.9 g (0.35 oz) of insects per night, or 125% of her own weight.

An often-mentioned statement is that "bats can eat 1000 mosquitoes per hour." While the little brown bat does consume mosquitoes and has high energetic needs, the study that is the basis for this claim was an experiment in which individuals were put into rooms full of either mosquitoes or fruit flies. For a duration up to 31 minutes, they captured an average of 1.5–5.7 mosquitoes per minute. The individual most efficient at catching fruit flies caught an average of 14.8 per minute for 15 minutes. Extrapolating these numbers results in conclusions that it can eat approximately 340 mosquitoes per hour, or 890 fruit flies. However, there is no assurance that individuals forage with such high efficiencies for long periods of time, or that prey is dense enough in natural settings to allow capture rates observed in enclosed areas.

Predation and disease

The little brown bat likely has few predators. Known predators include owls such as the eastern screech owl, northern saw-whet owl, and the great horned owl. Raccoons are also opportunistic predators of the little brown bat, picking individuals off the cave walls of their hibernacula (caves used for hibernation) or eating individuals that have fallen to the cave floor.

The presence of helminth parasites in the gastrointestinal tract of the little brown bat is most common in the spring and fall and least common in the summer. Digenetic trematodes are the most common of these parasites, with the more common of these species including Ototrema schildti and Plagiorchis vespertilionis. The little brown bat is also affected by ectoparasites (external parasites), including bat fleas such as Myodopsylla insignis, chiggers like Leptotrombidium myotis, and the bat mites Spinturnix americanus. When parasitizing a female bat, bat mites synchronize their reproductive cycle with that of their host, with their own reproduction tied to the host's pregnancy hormones. Lactating females have a higher intensity of parasitization by mites, which may promote vertical transmission—the transfer of mites to the bat's offspring.

The little brown bat is affected by the rabies virus—specifically, the strain associated with this species is known as MlV1. However, it is susceptible to other strains of the virus, including those of the big brown bat and the silver-haired bat, which is most lethal to humans. The rabies virus can be present in an individual's saliva, meaning that it can be spread through bites, 12–18 days before the individual begins showing symptoms. Individuals do not always develop rabies after exposure, though. In one study, no little brown bats developed rabies after subcutaneous exposure to the MlV1 strain. Some individuals in the wild have antibodies for the rabies virus.

The little brown bat is also susceptible to the disease white-nose syndrome, which is caused by the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans. The disease affects individuals when they are hibernating, which is when their body temperatures are within the ideal growth range of P. destructans, 1–15 °C (34–59 °F). Pseudogymnoascus destructans is the first known pathogen that kills a mammal host during its torpor. Mortality from white-nose syndrome begins to manifest 120 days after hibernation begins, and mortality peaks 180 days after bats enter hibernacula. The growth of P. destructans on bats erodes the skin of their wing and tail membranes, muzzles, and ears. White-nose syndrome causes affected bats to burn through their energy reserves twice as fast as uninfected individuals. In addition to visible fungus growth on the nose, ears, and wings, white-nose syndrome results in higher carbon dioxide levels in the blood, causing acidosis, and hyperkalemia (elevated blood potassium). Arousal from torpor becomes more frequent, and water loss increases due increased respiration rate in an attempt to remove excess carbon dioxide from the blood. The premature loss of fat reserves during hibernation results in starvation.

Survivors of white-nose syndrome have longer bouts of torpor and lower body temperatures during torpor than individuals that die. Some individuals are more likely to survive based on their genetics, which predisposes them to remain in torpor longer and have larger fat reserves. Little brown bats are most affected by white-nose syndrome when they exhibit social, grouping behavior when hibernating, as P. destructans is transmitted by direct contact. In hibernacula where bats exhibit more solitary behavior, colonies are more prone to avoid infections of white-nose syndrome. In some colonies where grouping behavior was common before exposure to white-nose syndrome, bats now hibernate in a more solitary fashion. Before white-nose syndrome, only 1.16% of little brown bats hibernated singly; after white-nose syndrome, the percentage grew to 44.5%.

Range and habitat

The little brown bat lives throughout much of North America. In the north, its range extends as far west as Alaska and across much of Canada to Labrador. In the south, its range extends to Southern California and across the northern parts of Arizona and New Mexico. Historically, the largest known aggregations of this species occurred in the karstic regions of the Eastern United States.

Roosting habitat

The little brown bat roosts in sheltered places during the day. These roosts can include human structures or natural structures such as tree hollows, wood piles, rocky outcrops, or, occasionally, caves. Species of trees used for roosting include quaking aspen, balsam poplar, oak, and maple. It prefers roosts that are warm and dark. For maternity colonies, females prefer roosts that are 23.3–34.4 °C (73.9–93.9 °F).

Hibernation habitat

The little brown bat hibernates in caves or old mines. Females migrate up to hundreds of kilometers from their summer ranges to reach these hibernacula. It prefers hibernacula in which the relative humidity is greater than 90% and ambient temperatures are above the freezing point. Preferred hibernacula also maintain a constant temperature throughout the winter.

Foraging habitat

The little brown bat forages along the edges of vegetated habitat. It also forages along the edges of bodies of water or streams. In one study in the Canadian province of Alberta, its foraging activity was significantly higher in old-growth forest than would be expected based on its relative availability.

Conservation

As of 2021, the little brown bat is evaluated as an endangered species by the IUCN, a dramatic change from 2008 when it was designated as the lowest conservation priority, least concern. Until recently, the species was regarded as one of the most common bats in North America. However, a serious threat to the species has emerged in the form of a fungus-caused disease known as white-nose syndrome. It was one of the first bat species documented with the disease, which now affects at least seven hibernating bat species in the United States and Canada. From 2006 to 2011, over one million little brown bats died from the disease in the Northeastern United States, with winter hibernacula populations declining up to 99%. As of 2017, hibernacula counts for little brown bats in the Northeast had declined by an average of 90%.

White-nose syndrome first appeared in New York in 2006; it has steadily diffused from eastern New York, though, until recently, remaining east of the Rocky Mountains. In March 2016, white-nose syndrome was detected on a little brown bat in King County, Washington, representing a 1,300 mi (2,100 km) jump from the previous westernmost extent of the disease in any bat species.

In 2010, Frick et al. predicted a 99% chance of local extinction of little brown bats by the year 2026. They also predicted that the pre-white-nose syndrome population of 6.5 million individuals could be reduced to as few as 65,000 (1%) via the disease outbreak. Despite heavy declines, the species has avoided extinction in the Northeast through the persistence of small, localized populations. While the mortality rate of the disease is very high, some individuals that are exposed do survive.

In 2010, Kunz and Reichard published a report arguing that the precipitous decline of the little brown bat justified its emergency listing as a federally endangered species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. However, it is not federally listed as threatened or endangered as of 2018, though several U.S. states list it as endangered (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia), threatened (Tennessee, Wisconsin), or of Special Concern (Michigan, Ohio).

The little brown bat was listed as an endangered species by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada in February 2012 after an emergency assessment. The emergency designation as endangered was confirmed in November 2013.

Relationship to people

Little brown bats commonly occupy human structures. Females will situate maternity colonies within buildings. This small body size of this species can make it challenging to prevent individuals from entering a structure, as they can take advantage of gaps or holes as small as 3.8 cm (1.5 in) × 0.64 cm (0.25 in). Once inside a building, a colony of little brown bats can disturb human inhabitants with their vocalizations and production of guano and urine. Large accumulations of guano can provide a growth medium for fungi, including the species that causes histoplasmosis. Concerns about humans becoming affected by bat ectoparasites such as ticks, fleas, or bat bugs are generally unfounded, as parasites that feed on bats are often specific to bats and die without them.

Because they are often found in proximity to humans, the little brown bat and the not-closely related big brown bat are the two bat species most frequently submitted for rabies testing in the United States. Little brown bats infrequently test positive for the rabies virus; of the 586 individuals submitted for testing across the United States in 2015, the most recent data available as of 2018, 16 (2.7%) tested positive for the virus.

Little brown bats are a species that will use bat houses for their roosts. Landowners will purchase or construct bat houses and install them, hoping to attract bats for various reasons. Some install bat houses in an attempt to negate the effects of removing a colony from a human structure ("rehoming" them into a more acceptable space). While this can be effective for other species, there is not evidence to suggest that this is effective for little brown bats, though it has been shown that little brown bats will choose to occupy artificial bat boxes installed at the sites of destroyed buildings that once housed colonies. Others are attempting to help bats out of concern for them due to the effects of white-nose syndrome. Bat houses are also installed in an attempt to control the bats' insect prey such as mosquitoes or taxa that harm crops.

Little brown bats are vulnerable near moving vehicles on roads, either foraging or crossing. Bats can easily be pulled into the slipstreams of faster moving vehicles. When little brown bats cross roads, they approach the road using canopy tree cover and avoid crossing where there is no cover. When the cover is lower, bats cross roads lower.

References

1. ^ Solari, S. (2021) . "Myotis lucifugus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2021: e.T14176A208031565. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-3.RLTS.T14176A208031565.en. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
2. ^ Fenton, M. Brock; Barclay, Robert M. R. (1980). "Myotis lucifugus". Mammalian Species (142): 1–8. doi:10.2307/3503792. JSTOR 3503792. S2CID 253932645.
3. Little Brown Myotis, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Ontario
4. ^ Stadelmann, B; Lin, L.K; Kunz, T.H; Ruedi, M (2007). "Molecular phylogeny of New World Myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA genes". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 43 (1): 32–48. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.019. PMID 17049280.
5. Cuvier, Georges; Baird, Spencer Fullerton; Goode, G. Brown; Latreille, P. A.; Laurillard, Charles Léopold; Mason, Otis Tufton; McElfresh, Henry; McMurtrie, Henry; Schoolcraft, Henry Rowe (1831). The animal kingdom arranged in conformity with its organization / by the Baron Cuvier; the Crustacea, Arachnides and Insecta, by P.A. Latreille; translated from the French, with notes and additions, by H. M'Murtrie; in four volumes, with plates. Vol. 1. G. & C. & H. Carvill. p. 431. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.41463.
6. ^ Hoofer, Steven R.; Bussche, Ronald A. Van Den (2003). "Molecular Phylogenetics of the Chiropteran Family Vespertilionidae". Acta Chiropterologica. 5: 1–63. doi:10.3161/001.005.s101. hdl:11244/44678. S2CID 83806884.
7. ^ Schwartz, Charles Walsh; Schwartz, Elizabeth Reeder (2001). The Wild Mammals of Missouri (illustrated ed.). University of Missouri Press. p. 69. ISBN 9780826213594.
8. Stangl, F. B.; Christiansen, P. G.; Galbraith, E. J. (1993). "Abbreviated guide to pronunciation and etymology of scientific names for North American land mammals north of Mexico" (PDF). Occasional Papers, the Museum, Texas Tech University (154): 7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 August 2019.
9. Lewis, Charlton (1890). "lūcĭfŭgus". An Elementary Latin Dictionary. Perseus Project. Retrieved 14 September 2021.
10. Davis, Wayne H.; Rippy, Charles L. (1968). "Distribution of Myotis lucifugus and Myotis austroriparius in the Southeastern United States". Journal of Mammalogy. 49 (1): 113–117. doi:10.2307/1377733. JSTOR 1377733.
11. ^ Simmons, N.B. (2005). "Order Chiroptera". In Wilson, D.E.; Reeder, D.M (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 510. ISBN 978-0-8018-8221-0. OCLC 62265494.
12. Piaggio, Antoinette J.; Valdez, Ernest W.; Bogan, Michael A.; Spicer, Greg S. (2002). "Systematics of Myotis occultus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) Inferred from Sequences of Two Mitochondrial Genes". Journal of Mammalogy. 83 (2): 386–395. doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0386:SOMOCV>2.0.CO;2. S2CID 46363786.
13. Jones, Clyde; Manning, Richard W. (1989). "Myotis austroriparius". Mammalian Species (332): 1–3. doi:10.2307/3504306. JSTOR 3504306. S2CID 253996734.
14. Morales, Ariadna E.; Carstens, Bryan C. (2018). "Evidence that Myotis lucifugus "Subspecies" are Five Nonsister Species, Despite Gene Flow". Systematic Biology. 67 (5): 756–769. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy010. PMID 29462459. S2CID 3418392.
15. Parkinson, Aida (1979). "Morphologic Variation and Hybridization in Myotis yumanensis sociabilis and Myotis lucifugus carissima". Journal of Mammalogy. 60 (3): 489–504. doi:10.2307/1380090. JSTOR 1380090.
16. Herd, Robert M.; Fenton, M. Brock (1983). "An electrophoretic, morphological, and ecological investigation of a putative hybrid zone between Myotis lucifugus and Myotis yumanensis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 61 (9): 2029–2050. doi:10.1139/z83-268.
17. ^ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2013). Wisconsin Little Brown Bat Species Guidance (PDF) (Report). Madison, Wisconsin: Bureau of Natural Heritage Conservation, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. PUB-ER-705.
18. Buchanan, G. Dale (1985). "Comments on Frequency of Melanism in Myotis lucifugus". Journal of Mammalogy. 66 (1): 178. doi:10.2307/1380979. JSTOR 1380979.
19. Fenton, M. Brock (1970). "The deciduous dentition and its replacement in Myotis lucifugus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 48 (4): 817–820. doi:10.1139/z70-143.
20. "Little Brown Myotis – Myotis lucifugus". Montana Field Guides. Montana Natural Heritage Program and Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
21. Zhao, Huabin; Xu, Dong; Zhou, Yingying; Flanders, Jon; Zhang, Shuyi (2009). "Evolution of opsin genes reveals a functional role of vision in the echolocating little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus)". Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 37 (3): 154–161. doi:10.1016/j.bse.2009.03.001.
22. ^ Bhatnagar, Kunwar P. (1975). "Olfaction in Artibeus jamaicensis and Myotis lucifugus in the context of vision and echolocation". Experientia. 31 (7): 856. doi:10.1007/BF01938504. PMID 1140332. S2CID 20671364.
23. Thomas, Donald W.; Fenton, M. Brock; Barclay, Robert M. R. (1979). "Social Behavior of the Little Brown Bat, Myotis lucifugus: I. Mating Behavior". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 6 (2): 129–136. doi:10.1007/BF00292559. S2CID 27019675.
24. Burns, Lynne E.; Frasier, Timothy R.; Broders, Hugh G. (2014). "Genetic connectivity among swarming sites in the wide ranging and recently declining little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus)". Ecology and Evolution. 4 (21): 4130–4149. doi:10.1002/ece3.1266. PMC 4242565. PMID 25505539.
25. Riccucci, M. (2010). "Same-sex sexual behaviour in bats". Hystrix: The Italian Journal of Mammalogy. 22 (1). doi:10.4404/Hystrix-22.1-4478.
26. Kunz, T. H.; Anthony, E. L. P. (1982). "Age Estimation and Post-Natal Growth in the Bat Myotis lucifugus". Journal of Mammalogy. 63 (1): 23–32. doi:10.2307/1380667. JSTOR 1380667.
27. ^ Kurta, Allen; Bell, Gary P.; Nagy, Kenneth A.; Kunz, Thomas H. (1989). "Energetics of Pregnancy and Lactation in Freeranging Little Brown Bats (Myotis lucifugus)". Physiological Zoology. 62 (3): 804–818. doi:10.1086/physzool.62.3.30157928. S2CID 86895612.
28. Brunet-Rossinni, Anja K. (2004). "Reduced free-radical production and extreme longevity in the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) versus two non-flying mammals". Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 125 (1): 11–20. doi:10.1016/j.mad.2003.09.003. PMID 14706233. S2CID 11019415.
29. Keen, R.; Hitchcock, H. B. (1980). "Survival and Longevity of the Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus) in Southeastern Ontario". Journal of Mammalogy. 61 (1): 1–7. doi:10.2307/1379951. JSTOR 1379951.
30. ^ Langwig, Kate E.; Frick, Winifred F.; Bried, Jason T.; Hicks, Alan C.; Kunz, Thomas H.; Marm Kilpatrick, A. (2012). "Sociality, density-dependence and microclimates determine the persistence of populations suffering from a novel fungal disease, white-nose syndrome" (PDF). Ecology Letters. 15 (9): 1050–1057. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01829.x. PMID 22747672.
31. Burnett, C. D.; August, P. V. (1981). "Time and energy budgets for dayroosting in a maternity colony of Myotis lucifugus". Journal of Mammalogy. 62 (4): 758–766. doi:10.2307/1380597. JSTOR 1380597.
32. Anthony, E. L. P.; Stack, M. H.; Kunz, T. H. (1981). "Night roosting and the nocturnal time budget of the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus: Effects of reproductive status, prey density, and environmental conditions". Oecologia. 51 (2): 151–156. Bibcode:1981Oecol..51..151A. doi:10.1007/BF00540593. PMID 28310074. S2CID 22435996.
33. Aldridge, H. D. J. N. (1988). "Flight kinematics and energetics in the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), with reference to the influence of ground effect". Journal of Zoology. 216 (3): 507–517. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb02447.x.
34. Henry, Mickaël; Thomas, Donald W.; Vaudry, Réal; Carrier, Michel (2002). "Foraging Distances and Home Range of Pregnant and Lactating Little Brown Bats (Myotis lucifugus)". Journal of Mammalogy. 83 (3): 767–774. doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0767:FDAHRO>2.0.CO;2. S2CID 84447754.
35. ^ Fenton, M. Brock; Bell, Gary P. (1979). "Echolocation and feeding behaviour in four species of Myotis (Chiroptera)". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 57 (6): 1271–1277. doi:10.1139/z79-163.
36. Clare, E. L.; Barber, B. R.; Sweeney, B. W.; Hebert, P. D. N.; Fenton, M. B. (2011). "Eating local: Influences of habitat on the diet of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus)". Molecular Ecology. 20 (8): 1772–1780. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05040.x. PMID 21366747. S2CID 3894216.
37. ^ Wray, Amy K.; Jusino, Michelle A.; Banik, Mark T.; Palmer, Jonathan M.; Kaarakka, Heather; White, J Paul; Lindner, Daniel L.; Gratton, Claudio; Peery, M Zachariah (2018). "Incidence and taxonomic richness of mosquitoes in the diets of little brown and big brown bats". Journal of Mammalogy. 99 (3): 668–674. doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyy044.
38. ^ "Can bats really eat 1000 mosquitoes per hour? A closer look at pest control claims". AL.com. Advance Local Media LLC. 30 August 2016. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
39. Tuttle, M. D.; Kiser, M.; Kiser, S. (2005). The bat house builder's handbook. University of Texas Press. p. 4. ISBN 9780974237916.
40. Griffin, Donald R.; Webster, Frederic A.; Michael, Charles R. (1960). "The echolocation of flying insects by bats". Animal Behaviour. 8 (3–4): 141–154. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.588.6881. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(60)90022-1.
41. Jung, Thomas S.; Lausen, Cori L.; Talerico, Jennifer M.; Slough, Brian G. (2011). "Opportunistic Predation of a Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus) by a Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus) in Southern Yukon". Northwestern Naturalist. 92: 69–72. doi:10.1898/10-06.1. S2CID 86181796.
42. McAlpine, Donald F.; Vanderwolf, Karen J.; Forbes, Graham J.; Malloch, David (2011). "Consumption of Bats (Myotis spp.) by Raccoons (Procyon lotor) During an Outbreak of White-Nose Syndrome in New Brunswick, Canada: Implications for Estimates of Bat Mortality". The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 125 (3): 257. doi:10.22621/cfn.v125i3.1231.
43. Coggins, James R.; Tedesco, John L.; Rupprecht, Charles E. (1982). "Seasonal changes and overwintering of parasites in the bat, Myotis lucifugus (Le Conte), in a Wisconsin hibernaculum". American Midland Naturalist. 107 (2): 305–315. doi:10.2307/2425381. JSTOR 2425381.
44. Poissant, J. A.; Broders, H. G. (2008). "Ectoparasite prevalence in Myotis lucifugus and M. septentrionalis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) during fall migration at Hayes Cave, Nova Scotia". Northeastern Naturalist. 15 (4): 515–522. doi:10.1656/1092-6194-15.4.515. S2CID 59152757.
45. Czenze, Zenon J.; Broders, Hugh G. (2011). "Ectoparasite Community Structure of Two Bats (Myotis lucifugus and M. septentrionalis) from the Maritimes of Canada". Journal of Parasitology Research. 2011: 1–9. doi:10.1155/2011/341535. PMC 3199115. PMID 22028951.
46. ^ Davis, A. D.; Jarvis, J. A.; Pouliott, C. E.; Morgan, S. M. D.; Rudd, R. J. (2013). "Susceptibility and Pathogenesis of Little Brown Bats (Myotis lucifugus) to Heterologous and Homologous Rabies Viruses". Journal of Virology. 87 (16): 9008–9015. doi:10.1128/JVI.03554-12. PMC 3754046. PMID 23741002.
47. Trimarchi, C. V.; Debbie, J. G. (1977). "Naturally Occurring Rabies Virus and Neutralizing Antibody in Two Species of Insectivorous Bats of New York State". Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 13 (4): 366–369. doi:10.7589/0090-3558-13.4.366. PMID 24228955. S2CID 11485247.
48. ^ Vonhof, Maarten J.; Russell, Amy L.; Miller-Butterworth, Cassandra M. (2015). "Range-Wide Genetic Analysis of Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus) Populations: Estimating the Risk of Spread of White-Nose Syndrome". PLOS ONE. 10 (7): e0128713. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1028713V. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128713. PMC 4495924. PMID 26154307.
49. Meteyer, Carol Uphoff; Valent, Mick; Kashmer, Jackie; Buckles, Elizabeth L.; Lorch, Jeffrey M.; Blehert, David S.; Lollar, Amanda; Berndt, Douglas; Wheeler, Emily; White, C. Leann; Ballmann, Anne E. (2011). "Recovery of Little Brown Bats (Myotis lucifugus) from Natural Infection with Geomyces destructans, White-Nose Syndrome". Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 47 (3): 618–626. doi:10.7589/0090-3558-47.3.618. PMID 21719826. S2CID 43256232.
50. ^ Lilley, Thomas Mikael; Johnson, Joseph Samuel; Ruokolainen, Lasse; Rogers, Elisabeth Jeannine; Wilson, Cali Ann; Schell, Spencer Mead; Field, Kenneth Alan; Reeder, Deeann Marie (2016). "White-nose syndrome survivors do not exhibit frequent arousals associated with Pseudogymnoascus destructans infection". Frontiers in Zoology. 13: 12. doi:10.1186/s12983-016-0143-3. PMC 4778317. PMID 26949407.
51. Lorch, Jeffrey M.; Meteyer, Carol U.; Behr, Melissa J.; Boyles, Justin G.; Cryan, Paul M.; Hicks, Alan C.; Ballmann, Anne E.; Coleman, Jeremy T.H.; Redell, David N.; Reeder, DeeAnn M. (2011). "Experimental infection of bats with Geomyces destructans causes white-nose syndrome" (PDF). Nature. 480 (7377): 376–8. Bibcode:2011Natur.480..376L. doi:10.1038/nature10590. PMID 22031324. S2CID 4381156.
52. Verant, Michelle L.; Meteyer, Carol U.; Speakman, John R.; Cryan, Paul M.; Lorch, Jeffrey M.; Blehert, David S. (2014). "White-nose syndrome initiates a cascade of physiologic disturbances in the hibernating bat host". BMC Physiology. 14: 10. doi:10.1186/s12899-014-0010-4. PMC 4278231. PMID 25487871.
53. Auteri, Giorgia G.; Knowles, Lacey L. (2020). "Decimated little brown bats show potential for adaptive change". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 3023. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.3023A. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59797-4. PMC 7033193. PMID 32080246.
54. Randall, Lea A.; Jung, Thomas S.; Barclay, Robert MR (2014). "Roost-Site Selection and Movements of Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus) in Southwestern Yukon". Northwestern Naturalist. 95 (3): 312–317. doi:10.1898/13-02.1. S2CID 85694194.
55. ^ Crampton, Lisa H.; Barclay, Robert M. R. (1998). "Selection of Roosting and Foraging Habitat by Bats in Different-Aged Aspen Mixedwood Stands". Conservation Biology. 12 (6): 1347–1358. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97209.x. S2CID 86447942.
56. Olson, Cory R.; Barclay, Robert M.R. (2013). "Concurrent changes in group size and roost use by reproductive female little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus)". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 91 (3): 149–155. doi:10.1139/cjz-2012-0267.
57. Miller-Butterworth, C. M.; Vonhof, M. J.; Rosenstern, J.; Turner, G. G.; Russell, A. L. (2014). "Genetic Structure of Little Brown Bats (Myotis lucifugus) Corresponds with Spread of White-Nose Syndrome among Hibernacula". Journal of Heredity. 105 (3): 354–364. doi:10.1093/jhered/esu012. PMID 24591103.
58. ^ Dzal, Y.; McGuire, L. P.; Veselka, N.; Fenton, M. B. (2011). "Going, going, gone: The impact of white-nose syndrome on the summer activity of the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus)". Biology Letters. 7 (3): 392–394. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0859. PMC 3097845. PMID 21106570.
59. ^ Dobony, Christopher A.; Johnson, Joshua B. (2018). "Observed Resiliency of Little Brown Myotis to Long-Term White-Nose Syndrome Exposure". Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. 9: 168–179. doi:10.3996/102017-JFWM-080.
60. "White-nose Syndrome: A Deadly Disease". batcon.org. Bat Conservation International. Retrieved 4 November 2018.
61. Frick, W. F.; Pollock, J. F.; Hicks, A. C.; Langwig, K. E.; Reynolds, D. S.; Turner, G. G.; Butchkoski, C. M.; Kunz, T. H. (2010). "An Emerging Disease Causes Regional Population Collapse of a Common North American Bat Species". Science. 329 (5992): 679–682. Bibcode:2010Sci...329..679F. doi:10.1126/science.1188594. PMID 20689016. S2CID 43601856.
62. Kunz, TH; Reichard, JD. (2010). Status review of the little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) and determination that immediate listing under the Endangered Species Act is scientifically and legally warranted. Status Review prepared for US Fish and Wildlife Service (PDF) (Report).
63. State of Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Bureau of Natural Resources (2015). "Connecticut's Endangered, Threatened and Special Concern Species" (PDF). Connecticut.gov.
64. "Myotis lucifugus (Little Brown Bat" (PDF). State of Maine. 13 January 2016.
65. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. "Little Brown Myotis Myotis lucifugus" (PDF). Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife.
66. "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife of NH". New Hampshire Fish and Game. New Hampshire Fish and Game Department. Retrieved 4 November 2018.
67. Thomas, Mary Ann (30 January 2019). "3 varieties of bats added to Pa. endangered species list". TRIB Live. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
68. "Little brown bat". Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department. State of Vermont. Retrieved 4 November 2018.
69. Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. "Special Status Faunal Species in Virginia" (PDF). Virginia.gov. Retrieved 4 November 2018.
70. "Rules and Regulation for in Need of Management, Threatened, and Endangered Species" (PDF). Tennessee.gov. Retrieved 4 November 2018.
71. "Michigan's Rare Animals". Michigan Natural Features Inventory. Michigan State University. Retrieved 4 November 2018.
72. Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife (July 2018). Ohio's Listed Species (PDF) (Report). R0718.
73. COSEWIC (2013). COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Little Brown Myotis Myotis lucifugus, Northern Myotis Myotis septentrionalis and Tri-colored Bat Perimyotis subflavus in Canada (Report). Ottawa: Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.
74. ^ Neilson, A.; Fenton, M. (1994). "Responses of Little Brown Myotis to Exclusion and to Bat Houses". Wildlife Society Bulletin. 22 (1): 8–14. JSTOR 3783215.
75. Greenhall, Arthur M.; Frantz, Stephen C. (1994). "Bats". The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage.
76. Birhane, Meseret G.; Cleaton, Julie M.; Monroe, Ben P.; Wadhwa, Ashutosh; Orciari, Lillian A.; Yager, Pamela; Blanton, Jesse; Velasco-Villa, Andres; Petersen, Brett W.; Wallace, Ryan M. (2017). "Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2015". Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 250 (10): 1117–1130. doi:10.2460/javma.250.10.1117. PMID 28467751. S2CID 41121211.
77. Tuttle, Merlin; Hensley, Donna (1993). "Bat Houses: The Secrets of Success". batcon.org. Bat Conservation International. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
78. Brittingham, Margaret C.; Williams, Lisa M. (2000). "Bat boxes as alternative roosts for displaced bat maternity colonies". Wildlife Society Bulletin. 28 (1): 197–207. JSTOR 4617303.
79. "How You Can Help". White-Nose Syndrome Response Team. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
80. Long, Rachael Freeman; Simpson, Tiffanie; Ding, Tzung-Su; Heydon, Steve; Reil, Wilbur (1998). "Bats feed on crop pests in Sacramento Valley". California Agriculture. 52: 8–10. doi:10.3733/ca.v052n01p8.
81. Christian C. Voigt, Tigga Kingston, ed. (2015). Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of Bats in a Changing World. Springer. ISBN 9783319252209.

• IUCN Red List endangered species
• Animal models
• Bats of Canada
• Bats of the United States
• Mammals described in 1831
• Mouse-eared bats
• Taxa named by John Eatton Le Conte