Misplaced Pages

In mathematics, a stochastic matrix is a square matrix used to describe the transitions of a Markov chain. Each of its entries is a nonnegative real number representing a probability. It is also called a probability matrix, transition matrix, substitution matrix, or Markov matrix. The stochastic matrix was first developed by Andrey Markov at the beginning of the 20th century, and has found use throughout a wide variety of scientific fields, including probability theory, statistics, mathematical finance and linear algebra, as well as computer science and population genetics. There are several different definitions and types of stochastic matrices:

• A right stochastic matrix is a square matrix of nonnegative real numbers, with each row summing to 1 (so it is also called a row stochastic matrix).
• A left stochastic matrix is a square matrix of nonnegative real numbers, with each column summing to 1 (so it is also called a column stochastic matrix).
• A doubly stochastic matrix is a square matrix of nonnegative real numbers with each row and column summing to 1.
• A substochastic matrix is a real square matrix whose row sums are all ${\displaystyle \leq 1.}$

In the same vein, one may define a probability vector as a vector whose elements are nonnegative real numbers which sum to 1. Thus, each row of a right stochastic matrix (or column of a left stochastic matrix) is a probability vector. Right stochastic matrices act upon row vectors of probabilities by multiplication from the right (hence their name) and the matrix entry in the i-th row and j-th column is the probability of transition from state i to state j. Left stochastic matrices act upon column vectors of probabilities by multiplication from the left (hence their name) and the matrix entry in the i-th row and j-th column is the probability of transition from state j to state i.

This article uses the right/row stochastic matrix convention.

History

The stochastic matrix was developed alongside the Markov chain by Andrey Markov, a Russian mathematician and professor at St. Petersburg University who first published on the topic in 1906. His initial intended uses were for linguistic analysis and other mathematical subjects like card shuffling, but both Markov chains and matrices rapidly found use in other fields.

Stochastic matrices were further developed by scholars such as Andrey Kolmogorov, who expanded their possibilities by allowing for continuous-time Markov processes. By the 1950s, articles using stochastic matrices had appeared in the fields of econometrics and circuit theory. In the 1960s, stochastic matrices appeared in an even wider variety of scientific works, from behavioral science to geology to residential planning. In addition, much mathematical work was also done through these decades to improve the range of uses and functionality of the stochastic matrix and Markovian processes more generally.

From the 1970s to present, stochastic matrices have found use in almost every field that requires formal analysis, from structural science to medical diagnosis to personnel management. In addition, stochastic matrices have found wide use in land change modeling, usually under the term Markov matrix.

Definition and properties

A stochastic matrix describes a Markov chain X_t over a finite state space S with cardinality α.

If the probability of moving from i to j in one time step is Pr(j|i) = P_i,j, the stochastic matrix P is given by using P_i,j as the i-th row and j-th column element, e.g.,

${\displaystyle P=\left.}$

Since the total of transition probability from a state i to all other states must be 1,

${\displaystyle \sum _{j=1}^{\alpha }P_{i,j}=1;\,}$

thus this matrix is a right stochastic matrix.

The above elementwise sum across each row i of P may be more concisely written as P1 = 1, where 1 is the α-dimensional column vector of all ones. Using this, it can be seen that the product of two right stochastic matrices P′ and P′′ is also right stochastic: P′ P′′ 1 = P′ (P′′ 1) = P′ 1 = 1. In general, the k-th power P of a right stochastic matrix P is also right stochastic. The probability of transitioning from i to j in two steps is then given by the (i, j)-th element of the square of P:

${\displaystyle \left(P^{2}\right)_{i,j}.}$

In general, the probability transition of going from any state to another state in a finite Markov chain given by the matrix P in k steps is given by P.

An initial probability distribution of states, specifying where the system might be initially and with what probabilities, is given as a row vector.

A stationary probability vector π is defined as a distribution, written as a row vector, that does not change under application of the transition matrix; that is, it is defined as a probability distribution on the set {1, …, n} which is also a row eigenvector of the probability matrix, associated with eigenvalue 1:

${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\pi }}P={\boldsymbol {\pi }}.}$

It can be shown that the spectral radius of any stochastic matrix is one. By the Gershgorin circle theorem, all of the eigenvalues of a stochastic matrix have absolute values less than or equal to one. Additionally, every right stochastic matrix has an "obvious" column eigenvector associated to the eigenvalue 1: the vector 1 used above, whose coordinates are all equal to 1. As left and right eigenvalues of a square matrix are the same, every stochastic matrix has, at least, a row eigenvector associated to the eigenvalue 1 and the largest absolute value of all its eigenvalues is also 1. Finally, the Brouwer Fixed Point Theorem (applied to the compact convex set of all probability distributions of the finite set {1, …, n}) implies that there is some left eigenvector which is also a stationary probability vector.

On the other hand, the Perron–Frobenius theorem also ensures that every irreducible stochastic matrix has such a stationary vector, and that the largest absolute value of an eigenvalue is always 1. However, this theorem cannot be applied directly to such matrices because they need not be irreducible.

In general, there may be several such vectors. However, for a matrix with strictly positive entries (or, more generally, for an irreducible aperiodic stochastic matrix), this vector is unique and can be computed by observing that for any i we have the following limit,

${\displaystyle \lim _{k\rightarrow \infty }\left(P^{k}\right)_{i,j}={\boldsymbol {\pi }}_{j},}$

where π_j is the j-th element of the row vector π. Among other things, this says that the long-term probability of being in a state j is independent of the initial state i. That both of these computations give the same stationary vector is a form of an ergodic theorem, which is generally true in a wide variety of dissipative dynamical systems: the system evolves, over time, to a stationary state.

Intuitively, a stochastic matrix represents a Markov chain; the application of the stochastic matrix to a probability distribution redistributes the probability mass of the original distribution while preserving its total mass. If this process is applied repeatedly, the distribution converges to a stationary distribution for the Markov chain.

Stochastic matrices and their product form a category, which is both a subcategory of the category of matrices and of the one of Markov kernels.

Example: Cat and Mouse

Suppose there is a timer and a row of five adjacent boxes. At time zero, a cat is in the first box, and a mouse is in the fifth box. The cat and the mouse both jump to a random adjacent box when the timer advances. For example, if the cat is in the second box and the mouse is in the fourth, the probability that the cat will be in the first box and the mouse in the fifth after the timer advances is one fourth. If the cat is in the first box and the mouse is in the fifth, the probability that the cat will be in box two and the mouse will be in box four after the timer advances is one. The cat eats the mouse if both end up in the same box, at which time the game ends. Let the random variable K be the time the mouse stays in the game.

The Markov chain that represents this game contains the following five states specified by the combination of positions (cat,mouse). Note that while a naive enumeration of states would list 25 states, many are impossible either because the mouse can never have a lower index than the cat (as that would mean the mouse occupied the cat's box and survived to move past it), or because the sum of the two indices will always have even parity. In addition, the 3 possible states that lead to the mouse's death are combined into one:

• State 1: (1,3)
• State 2: (1,5)
• State 3: (2,4)
• State 4: (3,5)
• State 5: game over: (2,2), (3,3) & (4,4).

We use a stochastic matrix, ${\displaystyle P}$ (below), to represent the transition probabilities of this system (rows and columns in this matrix are indexed by the possible states listed above, with the pre-transition state as the row and post-transition state as the column). For instance, starting from state 1 – 1st row – it is impossible for the system to stay in this state, so ${\displaystyle P_{11}=0}$; the system also cannot transition to state 2 – because the cat would have stayed in the same box – so ${\displaystyle P_{12}=0}$, and by a similar argument for the mouse, ${\displaystyle P_{14}=0}$. Transitions to states 3 or 5 are allowed, and thus ${\displaystyle P_{13},P_{15}\neq 0}$ .

${\displaystyle P={\begin{bmatrix}0&0&1/2&0&1/2\\0&0&1&0&0\\1/4&1/4&0&1/4&1/4\\0&0&1/2&0&1/2\\0&0&0&0&1\end{bmatrix}}.}$

Long-term averages

No matter what the initial state, the cat will eventually catch the mouse (with probability 1) and a stationary state π = (0,0,0,0,1) is approached as a limit. To compute the long-term average or expected value of a stochastic variable ${\displaystyle Y}$, for each state ${\displaystyle S_{j}}$ and time ${\displaystyle t_{k}}$ there is a contribution of ${\displaystyle Y_{j,k}\cdot P(S=S_{j},t=t_{k})}$. Survival can be treated as a binary variable with ${\displaystyle Y=1}$ for a surviving state and ${\displaystyle Y=0}$ for the terminated state. The states with ${\displaystyle Y=0}$ do not contribute to the long-term average.

Phase-type representation

As State 5 is an absorbing state, the distribution of time to absorption is discrete phase-type distributed. Suppose the system starts in state 2, represented by the vector ${\displaystyle }$. The states where the mouse has perished don't contribute to the survival average so state five can be ignored. The initial state and transition matrix can be reduced to,

${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\tau }}=,\qquad T={\begin{bmatrix}0&0&{\frac {1}{2}}&0\\0&0&1&0\\{\frac {1}{4}}&{\frac {1}{4}}&0&{\frac {1}{4}}\\0&0&{\frac {1}{2}}&0\end{bmatrix}},}$

and

${\displaystyle (I-T)^{-1}{\boldsymbol {1}}={\begin{bmatrix}2.75\\4.5\\3.5\\2.75\end{bmatrix}},}$

where ${\displaystyle I}$ is the identity matrix, and ${\displaystyle \mathbf {1} }$ represents a column matrix of all ones that acts as a sum over states.

Since each state is occupied for one step of time the expected time of the mouse's survival is just the sum of the probability of occupation over all surviving states and steps in time,

${\displaystyle E={\boldsymbol {\tau }}\left(I+T+T^{2}+\cdots \right){\boldsymbol {1}}={\boldsymbol {\tau }}(I-T)^{-1}{\boldsymbol {1}}=4.5.}$

Higher order moments are given by

${\displaystyle E=n!{\boldsymbol {\tau }}(I-{T})^{-n}{T}^{n-1}\mathbf {1} \,.}$

See also

• Density matrix
• Markov kernel, the equivalent of a stochastic matrix over a continuous state space
• Matrix difference equation
• Models of DNA evolution
• Muirhead's inequality
• Probabilistic automaton
• Transition rate matrix, used to generalize the stochastic matrix to continuous time

References

1. Asmussen, S. R. (2003). "Markov Chains". Applied Probability and Queues. Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability. Vol. 51. pp. 3–8. doi:10.1007/0-387-21525-5_1. ISBN 978-0-387-00211-8.
2. ^ Lawler, Gregory F. (2006). Introduction to Stochastic Processes (2nd ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 1-58488-651-X.
3. ^ Hayes, Brian (2013). "First links in the Markov chain". American Scientist. 101 (2): 92–96. doi:10.1511/2013.101.92.
4. Charles Miller Grinstead; James Laurie Snell (1997). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Soc. pp. 464–466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
5. Kendall, D. G.; Batchelor, G. K.; Bingham, N. H.; Hayman, W. K.; Hyland, J. M. E.; Lorentz, G. G.; Moffatt, H. K.; Parry, W.; Razborov, A. A.; Robinson, C. A.; Whittle, P. (1990). "Andrei Nikolaevich Kolmogorov (1903–1987)". Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society. 22 (1): 33. doi:10.1112/blms/22.1.31.
6. Solow, Robert (1 January 1952). "On the Structure of Linear Models". Econometrica. 20 (1): 29–46. doi:10.2307/1907805. JSTOR 1907805.
7. Sittler, R. (1 December 1956). "Systems Analysis of Discrete Markov Processes". IRE Transactions on Circuit Theory. 3 (4): 257–266. doi:10.1109/TCT.1956.1086324. ISSN 0096-2007.
8. Evans, Selby (1 July 1967). "Vargus 7: Computed patterns from markov processes". Behavioral Science. 12 (4): 323–328. doi:10.1002/bs.3830120407. ISSN 1099-1743.
9. Gingerich, P. D. (1 January 1969). "Markov analysis of cyclic alluvial sediments". Journal of Sedimentary Research. 39 (1): 330–332. Bibcode:1969JSedR..39..330G. doi:10.1306/74d71c4e-2b21-11d7-8648000102c1865d. ISSN 1527-1404.
10. Krumbein, W. C.; Dacey, Michael F. (1 March 1969). "Markov chains and embedded Markov chains in geology". Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology. 1 (1): 79–96. doi:10.1007/BF02047072. ISSN 0020-5958.
11. Wolfe, Harry B. (1 May 1967). "Models for Conditioning Aging of Residential Structures". Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 33 (3): 192–196. doi:10.1080/01944366708977915. ISSN 0002-8991.
12. Krenk, S. (November 1989). "A Markov matrix for fatigue load simulation and rainflow range evaluation". Structural Safety. 6 (2–4): 247–258. doi:10.1016/0167-4730(89)90025-8.
13. Beck, J.Robert; Pauker, Stephen G. (1 December 1983). "The Markov Process in Medical Prognosis". Medical Decision Making. 3 (4): 419–458. doi:10.1177/0272989X8300300403. ISSN 0272-989X. PMID 6668990.
14. Gotz, Glenn A.; McCall, John J. (1 March 1983). "Sequential Analysis of the Stay/Leave Decision: U.S. Air Force Officers". Management Science. 29 (3): 335–351. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.3.335. ISSN 0025-1909.
15. Kamusoko, Courage; Aniya, Masamu; Adi, Bongo; Manjoro, Munyaradzi (1 July 2009). "Rural sustainability under threat in Zimbabwe – Simulation of future land use/cover changes in the Bindura district based on the Markov-cellular automata model". Applied Geography. 29 (3): 435–447. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.10.002.
16. Kardar, Mehran (2007). Statistical Physics of Fields. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-87341-3. OCLC 920137477.

• Matrices
• Markov models