 | This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Microsoft Corp. v. Lindows.com, Inc." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Microsoft v. Lindows | |
|---|---|
| Full case name | Microsoft Corp. v. Lindows.com Inc. |
| Decided | 2004 |
Microsoft v. Lindows.com, Inc. was a court case brought by Microsoft against Lindows, Inc in December 2001, claiming that the name "Lindows" was a violation of its trademark "Windows."
After two and a half years of court battles, Microsoft paid US$20 million for the Lindows trademark, and Lindows Inc. became Linspire Inc.
The case
In addition to the United States, Microsoft also sued Lindows in Sweden, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Canada.
Lindows started off with a handicap of having to defend themselves from their own lawyers (from St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company) who initially refused to defend Lindows. Judge Robert Takasugi found St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company had breached their contract.
In response to these lawsuits, Lindows launched ChoicePC.com, which allowed people to purchase lifetime Lindows memberships that included a copy of LindowsOS, LindowsOS upgrades for life, and a ChoicePC.com T-shirt, for US$100. All money from the memberships went towards helping Lindows in its legal battle against Microsoft.
Lindows had also retaliated against Microsoft's lawsuits with Lin---s (pronounced Lindash) and the corresponding domain lin---s.com (now disused). Consumers and resellers from countries in which Microsoft had blocked the sale of Lindows products due to the trademark lawsuits were encouraged to visit the Lin---s website instead of Lindows.com to purchase the Lin---s software, which was identical to Lindows except for the name change.
As early as 2002, a court rejected Microsoft's claims, stating that Microsoft had used the term "windows" to describe graphical user interfaces before the product, Windows, was ever released, and the windowing technique had already been implemented by Xerox and Apple many years before. Microsoft kept seeking retrial, but in February 2004, a judge rejected two of Microsoft's central claims. The judge denied Microsoft's request for a preliminary injunction and raised "serious questions" about Microsoft's trademark. Microsoft feared a court may define "Windows" as generic and result in the loss of its status as a trademark.
Settlement
In July 2004, Microsoft offered to settle with Lindows. As part of this licensing settlement, Microsoft paid an estimated US$20,000,000 (equivalent to $32,262,156 in 2023), and Lindows transferred the Lindows trademark to Microsoft and changed their name to Linspire.
See also
References
- A Legal Victory: We Got Our Slingshot
- Perez, Juan Carlos (April 20, 2004). "Lindows Prepares to Go Public". PC World. Archived from the original on December 12, 2006.
- LINDOWS INC Securities Registration Statement (S-1/A) Legal Proceedings
- Brian Morrissey (May 16, 2002). "Microsoft's Appeal in 'Lindows' Case Rejected". internetnews.com. Retrieved May 2, 2006.
- Jo Best (February 11, 2004). "Lindows wins in US court Microsoft ruling". Silicon.com. Archived from the original on February 8, 2005. Retrieved May 2, 2006.
- Joris Evers (July 19, 2004). "Microsoft, Lindows Make a Deal". PC World. Archived from the original on June 18, 2006. Retrieved May 7, 2006.
External links
- Microsoft Legal News
- Windows v. Lindows: High-Tech Trademark Troubles
- Microsoft's press release announcing the settlement
