Misplaced Pages

Mubarek zone was the name given to a Soviet-Uzbek project to promote Crimean Tatar settlement into the newly formed Mubarek District of the Uzbek SSR, instead of allowing for them to return to their homeland in the Crimea. The project was very unpopular with most Crimean Tatars, who wanted to return to Crimea instead of settling into the Uzbek desert. Many Crimean Tatars viewed the project as an extension of the wider Uzbek cotton scandal. The project kicked off when the Mubarek District was established in the land of the Qashqadaryo Region of Southeastern Uzbekistan in 1978, and the whole settlement project was largely abandoned after the death of its mastermind, Sharof Rashidov, in 1983.

Background

The Crimean Tatar people were deported from Crimea in 1944; while other deported peoples such as the Chechens, Ingush, Karachays, Balkars, and Kalmyks were permitted to return to their homelands and had their titular republics restored in the 1950s by Khrushchev, Crimean Tatars were not granted this right, as their labor was seen as too valuable to let go of by Uzbek authorities. Crimean Tatar rights activists had long been petitioning the government for the right to return to Crimea and restoration of their national autonomy (the Crimean ASSR), but the government steadfastly refused these demands.

Created in 1978, the area of the Mubarek District was one-fifth the size of Crimea. The climate was very hot, arid, and considered inhospitable, nothing like the lush greenery of Crimea; there were only six tiny settlements in the district when it was formed, composed of Turkmen tribesmen. However, as of 2021, the district has a population of over 88,000 and is much more developed.

Project

Intending to eliminate the Crimean Tatars' desire to return to Crimea, and further rooting Crimean Tatars in their places of exile, the Soviet government came up with the plan of creating a national autonomy with compact residence for them in the almost completely uninhabited Qashqadaryo desert, where Crimean Tatars had no historic ties. Some people in the government felt that promising Crimean Tatars "compact residence" in Mubarek would stop them stop seeking a return to Crimea and restoration of the Crimean ASSR. One of the main organizers of the project was Sharof Rashidov, the leader of the Uzbek SSR at the time.

The Mubarek District of the Uzbek SSR, located within the Qashqadaryo Region, was formed for the project in September 1978; this was followed by the creation of Bahoristan District in April 1979. Nazim Osmanov was chosen to be the secretary of the new Mubarek District. Seit Tairov, First Secretary of the Jizzax Region and signatory of the Letter of Seventeen, was recruited to aid the project. As the project was unsuccessful he was transferred to the Ministry of Forestry, leading to jokes that he was chosen for the position to make trees take root since he failed at making Crimean Tatars take root in the area.

Despite promises of creating national autonomy with cultural institutions for Crimean Tatars, the government still had no intention of treating Crimean Tatars as a completely distinct ethnic group and continued to maintain the line that Crimean Tatars were a subgroup of the Volga Tatars, a completely different ethnic group; only in 1989, years after the project was canceled, did the government abolish all restrictions on the use of the term Crimean Tatar.

Attempted implementation

The Communist Party put pressure on respected members of the Crimean Tatar community like Mustafa Selimov to support the project, but he completely refused and said that returning to Crimea would be the only solution to their national question. Other Crimean Tatars like Şamil Alâdin caved into the pressure and conducted agitation encouraging Crimean Tatars to move to Mubarek. Deputy Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Uzbek SSR Georgy Orlov was chosen to meet with Crimean Tatar elites to recruit them into supporting the project. Timur Daĝcı, the head editor of the Crimean Tatar language newspaper Lenin Bayrağı was supportive of the project and sent his son to live in Mubarek to be an example for other Crimean Tatars. The newspaper Lenin Bayrağı] and the magazine Yıldız frequently published articles encouraging relocation to Mubarek, singing praises of the development of the project. Sources differ as to how supportive Cherkez Ali was of the project, with some sources reporting he was extremely skeptical of the project while others report he was supportive of the project; however, there is no dispute that he did actively encourage Crimean Tatars to move to the Mubarek district. Writer and poet Şamil Alâdin also helped promote the project after he was asked to by Georgy Orlov; he did not deny his remarks in which he said he would support the project because the party wanted it. However, he had little enthusiasm about it despite Georgy Orlov constantly trying to increase his enthusiasm for resettlement in Mubarek.

Very few Crimean Tatars willingly moved to Mubarek; many were put under intense pressure to move there. Some were effectively forced to move to Mubarek after being re-deported from Crimea after attempting to return and then being only offered a residence permit in the Mubarek area. In 1983 the government tried to make all graduates of the Crimean Tatar language department of the Nizami Pedagogical Institute (which was not called a Crimean Tatar language faculty but rather called Tatlit institute due to censorship) move to the area, but they strongly protested the plan. The government never told them an official reason for demanding that all of them move to Mubarek even though there were only two job spots open for them, nor did the party answer why it was not sending any of them to cities with large Crimean Tatar populations like Chirchiq. But in the end, it was clear that the reason that all of them were told to go to Mubarek despite most not being needed for work was to increase the population of Crimean Tatars in the district.

Only a tiny fraction of the Crimean Tatar population moved to Mubarek; while the government claimed that 4,000 of them moved to Mubarek, this figure is derived from the combination of Crimean Tatars and Volga Tatars who moved there, with the actual population of Crimean Tatars being somewhere between 1,900 to 2,000.

The project was canceled shortly after the death of Sharof Rashidov, the mastermind of the project, who fell out of favor of party leadership after the cotton affair got more attention.

Reception

Most Crimean Tatars had no desire to resettle anywhere except in Crimea and were not interested in a national autonomy outside Crimea and especially did not want to participate in the project by relocating to the Mubarek District. Most Crimean Tatars viewed it as merely a scheme of Sharof Rashidov to fleece Moscow of more funds. Among the few Crimean Tatars such as Şamil Alâdin who supposed the project, many did so reluctantly and only because the Communist Party wanted them to.

Some Crimean Tatar participants in the project admitted that they understood the inherently flawed nature of the plan were personally uncomfortable with the idea and did not expect it to amount to anything. Crimean Tatars who supported the project were typically stigmatized as traitors to other Crimean Tatars. The project beneficial to the development of area, which was desolate at the time, and so supports of Rashidov view the project as one of his many accomplishments. However, the project remains seen in an almost universally negative light by Crimean Tatars, who compare other resettlement projects that promote residing outside of Crimea as "Mubarek zone" style projects as a point of comparison. While Crimean Tatar-Uzbek relations were not as terrible as Meskhetian Turk-Uzbek relations, and often were positive, the project did anger many Uzbeks who did not want Moscow to give Crimean Tatars a national autonomy in Uzbekistan, and Crimean Tatar-Uzbek relations could have worsened if Crimean Tatars went along with the plan to occupy the Mubarek District.

See also

• Uzbek cotton scandal
• Virgin Lands campaign

Footnotes

1. The project has been referred to as the Mubarek zone, the Mubarek project, the Mubarek plan, the Mubarek Republic, etc. The project was expanded to encompass the Bahoristan Region in 1979, but the project largely focused on the Mubarek area.
2. Uzbek: Muborak tumani
3. ^ Even though the government was marketing the project as a national autonomy for Crimean Tatars, the government did not count Crimean Tatars as a distinct ethnic group in censuses and officially considered Crimean Tatars to be a subgroup of Volga Tatars despite their different origins. For more information, read Denial of Crimean Tatars by the Soviet Union.

References

1. Cumper & Wheatly 1999, p. 242.
2. Buckley, Ruble & Hofmann 2008, p. 213.
3. Aydın 2021, p. 109.
4. ^ Allworth 1988, p. 344.
5. Биз - къырымлармыз!: Мы - крымцы! 2006, p. 15.
6. ^ Salman 1984, p. 60.
7. "Urban and rural population by district" (PDF) (in Uzbek). Qashqadaryo regional department of statistics.
8. ^ Aydın 2021, p. 109-110.
9. ^ Uehling 2004, p. 161.
10. ^ Так это было 1993, p. 108.
11. Khayali 2016, p. 32.
12. Reshitov 2021.
13. Bekirova 2004, p. 155.
14. Guboglo 1992, p. 189.
15. ^ Aydın 2021, p. 110.
16. Williams 2021, p. 336.
17. Buckley, Ruble & Hofmann 2008, p. 238.
18. ^ Allworth 1988, p. 345.
19. Allworth 1988, p. 345-346.
20. Guboglo 1998, p. 657.
21. ^ Guboglo 1992, p. 122.
22. Шестой процесс 2001, p. 204.
23. Allworth 1988, p. 350-352.
24. ^ Allworth 1988, p. 346.
25. Биз - къырымлармыз!: Мы - крымцы! 2006, p. 33-34.
26. Allworth 1988, p. 351.
27. Allworth 1988, p. 349.
28. Aydın 2021, p. 111.
29. ^ Mikhailov 2018.
30. Ubiria 2015, p. 237.
31. ^ Williams 2021, p. 432.
32. Bezaziev 2003.
33. Bissell 2007, p. 355.
34. Eminov 2018.
35. ^ Williams 2016, p. 134.
36. Starr 2014, p. 188-189.
37. Williams 2001, p. 438. sfn error: no target: CITEREFWilliams2001 (help)
38. Allworth 1998, p. 197. sfn error: no target: CITEREFAllworth1998 (help)
39. Rayfield 2024, p. 450.

Bibliography

• Allworth, Edward (1988). Tatars of the Crimea: Their Struggle for Survival : Original Studies from North America, Unofficial and Official Documents from Czarist and Soviet Sources. Columbia University Center for the Study of Central Asia. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-0758-7.
• Aydın, Filiz Tutku (2021). Émigré, Exile, Diaspora, and Transnational Movements of the Crimean Tatars: Preserving the Eternal Flame of Crimea. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-74124-2.
• Bekirova, Gulnara (2004). Крымскотатарская проблема в СССР: 1944-1991 [The Crimean Tatar Problem in the USSR: 1944-1991] (in Russian). Odzzhak. ISBN 978-966-8535-06-2.
• Bezaziev, Lentun (August 2003). "Начало и крах мубарекской эпопеи" [The Beginning and Fall of the Mubarak Epic]. Krymskie izvestiya.
• Bissell, Tom (2007). Chasing the Sea: Lost Among the Ghosts of Empire in Central Asia. New York: Pantheon Books. ISBN 978-0-375-42130-3.
• Buckley, Cynthia; Ruble, Blair; Hofmann, Erin (2008). Migration, Homeland, and Belonging in Eurasia. Woodrow Wilson Center Press. ISBN 9780801890758.
• Cumper, Peter; Wheatly, Steven (1999). Minority Rights in the "new" Europe: The Hague. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
• Eminov, Ruslan (6 September 2018). "Кто лоббировал Мубарекскую зону на Украине" [Who lobbied for the Mubarak zone in Ukraine]. Milli Firka (in Russian).
• Guboglo, Mikhail (1992). Крымскотатарское национальное движение: Документы, материалы, хроника [Crimean Tatar National Movement: Documents, Materials, Chronicle] (in Russian). Russian Academy of Sciences.
• Guboglo, Mikhail (1998). Языки этнической мобилизации [Languages of Ethnic Mobilization] (in Russian). Языки русской культуры. ISBN 978-5-7859-0065-3.
• Khayali, Rustem (2016). "Политико-правовое урегулирование крымско-татарской проблемы в СССР (1956-1991 гг. )" [Political and legal settlement of the Crimean Tatar problem in the USSR (1956-1991)]. Leningradsky Yuridicheskiy Zhurnal (in Russian) (3).
• Mikhailov, Viktor (13 November 2018). "Алишер Садыков: Шараф Рашидов — история толерантности" [Alisher Sadykov: Sharaf Rashidov - a history of tolerance].
• Rayfield, Donald (2024). 'A Seditious and Sinister Tribe': The Crimean Tatars and Their Khanate. Reaktion Books. ISBN 978-1-78914-959-3.
• Reshitov, Nariman (28 August 2021). "Коммунисты крымские татары в годы комендантского надзора и в условиях депортации (1944—1991 гг.)". goloskrimanew.ru.
• Salman, Yusuf (1984). "Crimean Tatars: The Resistance Continues". Afkār Inquiry. 1 (4).
• Starr, Stephen Frederick (2014). Ferghana Valley: The Heart of Central Asia. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-47066-3.
• Ubiria, Grigol (2015). Soviet Nation-Building in Central Asia: The Making of the Kazakh and Uzbek Nations. Routeledge.
• Uehling, Greta (2004). Beyond Memory: The Crimean Tatars' Deportation and Return. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4039-8127-1.
• Vyatkin, Anatoly; Kulpin, E.S. (1997). Крымские татары: проблемы репатриации [Crimean Tatars: problems of repatriation] (in Russian). Ин-т востоковедения РАН. ISBN 978-5-89282-031-8.
• Williams, Brian (2016). The Crimean Tatars: From Soviet Genocide to Putin's Conquest. Oxford University Press.
• Williams, Brian (2021). The Crimean Tatars: The Diaspora Experience and the Forging of a Nation. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-49128-1.
• Биз - къырымлармыз!: Мы - крымцы! [We are Crimeans!] (in Crimean Tatar). Aqmescit. 2006. ISBN 9663541180.
• Шестой процесс Мустафы Джемилева: материалы следствия и запись судебного процесса, 1983-1984 гг., г. Ташкент [The sixth trial of Mustafa Dzhemilev: investigation materials and recording of the trial, 1983-1984, Tashkent] (in Russian). Fond "Krym". 2001.
• Так это было: национальные репрессии в СССР 1919-1952 годы : в 3-х томах, Volume 3 [This is how it was: national repressions in the USSR 1919-1952: in 3 volumes]. Rossiysky muzhdunar. fond kultury. 1993.

• Settlement schemes in the Soviet Union
• De-Tatarization of Crimea