Misplaced Pages

Nationally significant infrastructure project

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Major infrastructure developments in England and Wales

The route of the Thames Tideway Tunnel, an NSIP which was approved in 2014

In England and Wales, a nationally significant infrastructure project (NSIP) is a major infrastructure development that bypasses normal local planning requirements. These include proposals for power plants, large renewable energy projects, new airports and airport extensions, and major road and rail projects. The NSIP nomenclature began to be used in 2008, and since April 2012 these projects have been managed by the Planning Inspectorate.

History

NSIP were initially controlled by the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC), which was established by the Planning Act 2008, which began operating on 1 October 2009 on an advice and guidance basis. Full powers of the IPC to receive, examine and approve applications for development consent came into force on 1 March 2010.

The IPC was subsequently abolished by the Localism Act 2011, which transferred decision-making powers created by the 2008 Act to the relevant Secretary of State. Since 1 April 2012, acceptance and examination of applications for development consent is dealt with by a new Infrastructure Planning Unit within the Planning Inspectorate.

Procedure

Sizewell B Nuclear Power Station

NSIP are given planning permission via a Development Consent Order (DCO). The Planning Act 2008 created a new regime for development consent for certain types of nationally significant infrastructure, including but not limited to nuclear and wind energy, airports, harbours, and wastewater projects. This new regime was intended to replace the traditional planning system and managed to reduce uncertainty around NSIP by introducing DCOs which were aimed towards increasing efficiency by reducing the amount of consent regimes required to meet development consent, as the old system required approval over several pieces of legislation. One example would be that the Sizewell B nuclear power station required consent under legislation including Section 2 of the Electric Lighting Act 1909 and planning permission in Section 40 of the Town and Country Planning Act. This was amended under Part 4 of the Planning Act 2008 where this new process would require a DCO. This is an application for approval to construct a NSIP which is dealt with by the Planning Inspectorate who recommends the application to the Secretary of State, whom in turn has the authority to decide upon whether development should go ahead. Prior to the introduction of the Planning Act 2008, it was apparent that the town and planning system was not a "one-size fits all" solution when it came to major infrastructure projects such as Heathrow Terminal 5, which had planning permission granted eight years after the inquiry was submitted. The introduction of the Planning Act was seen as more successful than the previous regime by most accounts, as it managed to reduce costs associated with the inefficient planning system by taking a more front-loaded approach such as the unification of the consent regime, introduction of National Policy Statements and introduction of a fixed timetable for the various stages of the application.

Criticisms of the new procedure

Galloper offshore wind farm

The new procedure was criticised in various ways; one such criticism was that past the application stage, there was very little room for amendment. This could potentially be expensive and time-consuming if amendments to a DCO would be made. An example would be Galloper offshore wind farm, where there had been a request submitted for a "non-material" change which specified a slight amendment to the diameter of each monopile foundation from 7 meters (23 feet) to less than 7.5 meters (25 feet). This non-material change had been crucial to the construction of the wind turbines and had it not been approved, the entire NSIP would have been financially unviable. This reluctance for the approval of material amendments was strictly in line with the vigorous pre-consultation requirements under part 4 of the Planning Act 2008, which many criticisms were also directed towards. A report published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government detailing a post-implementation review of the new planning system has shown that there have not been any applications for a "material change" yet.

Common criticisms were directed towards the extensive pre-consultation requirements which meant that applications would take a long time to prepare as it takes two and a half months for consultation with the local authorities, the local community and statutory consultees before an application could be approved. An example would be the need for public consultation as the Planning Act 2008 requires that all applications for a DCO must follow the National Policy Statements, and during the pre-application process Section 47 requires the applicant to prepare a statement regarding how they propose to consult the local community. However, local residents revealed that pre-application consultation fell within the range of 'poor' to 'very poor' and a prominent critique was that communication between local authorities and the local community was too one sided and developers were reluctant to engage with local opinions and dialogue.

Amendments

Planning Act 2008

Prior to the introduction of the Planning Act 2008, consents were often required under two or three pieces of legislation for a single project. The need for several different pieces of legislation to achieve planning consent meant that attempting to gain planning approval often led to delay, uncertainty and frustration. The introduction of the Planning Act 2008 managed to remove the need for other consent regimes providing a "one stop shop" to receive consent, instead of having to go to several bodies. Part 4 of the Planning Act 2008 states that NSIP will require a DCO, eliminating the need to seek approval under different regimes.

Localism Act 2011

The Localism Act 2011, which received royal assent on 15 November 2011, introduced further reforms towards the planning process for NSIP. The Localism Act 2011 reduced the number of local authorities that need to be consulted during the pre-application stage. In addition, the requirement that community consultation had to be published in a local newspaper was removed. This addressed some common complaints towards the planning process, which included that the pre-consultation requirements for NSIP were too onerous and time-consuming.

References

  1. "Thames Tideway Tunnel". planninginspectorate.gov.uk. The Planning Inspectorate. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
  2. "National Infrastructure Planning". planninginspectorate.gov.uk. Planning Inspectorate. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
  3. "Development Consent Orders". cpre.org.uk. Campaign to Protect Rural England. Retrieved 23 May 2020.
  4. "E . The Town and Country Planning (Grants) Regulations, 1950", Land Planning Law in a Free Society, Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press, 1951, doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674492608.c21 (inactive 1 November 2024), ISBN 978-0-674-49260-8, retrieved 14 May 2021{{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  5. Marshall, Tim (2016). "Infrastructure, Planning and the Command of Time". Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 34 (8): 1843–1866. Bibcode:2016EnPlC..34.1843M. doi:10.1177/0263774X16642768. S2CID 156846991.
  6. "The process | National Infrastructure Planning". planninginspectorate.gov.uk. The Planning Inspectorate. Retrieved 15 January 2024.
  7. Department for Communities and Local Government, Planning Act 2008: Guidance for the examination of applications for development consent (2015) (4).
  8. White, Matthew (2013). "Attaining the age of consents: Five years of the planning act 2008" (PDF). Joint Planning Conference Oxford. 41: 55 – via jplc.
  9. Catherine Ann Caine, 'The Race to the Water for Offshore Renewable Energy: Assessing Cumulative and In-Combination Impacts for Offshore Renewable Energy Developments' (2020) 32 Journal of Environmental Law 83.
  10. UK Parliament, Planning and major infrastructure: key issues for the 2010 Parliament (2010) <https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/key-issues-for-the-new-parliament/green-growth/major-infrastructure-planning/> accessed 5 June 2021.
  11. Marshall, Tim; Cowell, Richard (2016). "Infrastructure, planning and the command of time". Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 34 (8): 1, 843–1, 866. Bibcode:2016EnPlC..34.1843M. doi:10.1177/0263774X16642768. S2CID 156846991.
  12. The Galloper Wind Farm (Amendment) Order 2015
  13. Morphet, Janice (2017). "Infrastructure Delivery: the DCO process in context" (PDF). Infrastructure Delivery: The DCO Process in Context - Main Report. 1: 57 – via University College London.
  14. Morphet, Janet (2016). "Infrastructure Delivery: the DCO process in context" (PDF). Infrastructure Delivery: The DCO Process in Context - Main Report. 1: 39 – via UCL.
  15. Department for Communities and Local Government, Reviewing the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Planning Regime (2013) (11)
  16. White, Matthew (2013). "Attaining the age of consents: Five years of the planning act 2008" (PDF). Joint Planning Law Conference Oxford. 41: 51 – via jplc.
  17. Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Post Implementation Review of The Infrastructure Planning (Changes to, and Revocation of, Development Consent Orders) Regulations 2011.
  18. Department for Communities and Local Government, Reviewing the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Planning Regime (2013) (11)
  19. Planning Act 2008 s 47.
  20. Natarajan, L. (2017). "Navigating the participatory processes of renewable energy infrastructure regulation: A 'local participant perspective' on the NSIP's regime in England and Wales". The International Journal of the Political, Economic, Planning, Environmental and Social Aspects of Energy. 114: 201–210 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  21. UK Parliament, Planning and major infrastructure: key issues for the 2010 Parliament (2010) <https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/key-issues-for-the-new-parliament/green-growth/major-infrastructure-planning/> accessed 5 June 2021. Categories
  22. Department for Communities and Local Government, Major Infrastructure Planning: expanding and improving the 'one stop shop' approach for consents (2013) (1).
  23. Department for Communities and Local Government, 'Planning Act 2008: Guidance on Changes to Development Consent orders' (2015) (6).
  24. "Practical Law UK Signon". signon.thomsonreuters.com. Retrieved 15 May 2021.
  25. "Policy statement for part 2 of the Localism Act 2011". gov.uk. Retrieved 15 May 2021.
  26. Department for Communities and Local Government, Government response to the consultation on the review of the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Planning Regime (2014) (5).
Stub icon

This England-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Stub icon

This Wales-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Stub icon

This article relating to Town and country planning in the United Kingdom is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: