Misplaced Pages

Part of a series on
Discrimination
Forms Institutional Structural Statistical Taste-based
Attributes Age Caste Class Dialect Disability Genetic Hair texture Height Language Looks Mental disorder Race / Ethnicity Skin color Scientific racism Rank Sex Sexual orientation Species Size Viewpoint
Social Arophobia Acephobia Adultism Anti-albinism Anti-autism Anti-homelessness Anti-drug addicts Anti-intellectualism Anti-intersex Anti-left handedness Anti-Masonry Aporophobia Audism Biphobia Clannism Elitism Ephebiphobia Social determinants of health Social determinants of health in poverty Social determinants of mental health Fatphobia Gayphobia Gerontophobia Heterosexism HIV/AIDS stigma Homophobia Leprosy stigma Lesbophobia Discrimination against men Misandry Misogyny Nepotism Pedophobia Perpetual foreigner Pregnancy Sectarianism Supremacism Aryanism Autistic Black Chauvinism Female Illusory Jewish Male Nordicism Tigraynization Ultranationalism White Transphobia 21st-century anti-trans movement in the United Kingdom Non-binary Transmisogyny Trans men Vegaphobia Xenophobia
Religious Atheism Exclusivism Baháʼí Faith Buddhism Christianity Persecution Catholicism Eastern Orthodoxy Jehovah's Witnesses LDS or Mormon Protestantism Tewahedo Orthodoxy post–Cold War era Falun Gong Hinduism Persecution Untouchability Islam Persecution Ahmadiyya Shi'ism Sufism Sunnism minority Muslim Judaism Persecution Neopaganism Rastafari Sikhism Yazidism Zoroastrianism
Ethnic/national Afghan African Albanian Arab Armenian Asian France South Africa United States Assyrian Australian Austrian Azerbaijani Black people African Americans China South Africa Bengali Bulgarian Catalan Chechen Chinese Colombian Croat Dutch English Estonian Filipino French Fulani Finnish Georgian German Greek Haitian Hazara Hungarian Igbo Indian Indigenous people Australia Canada United States Iranian Irish Italian Japanese Jewish Antisemitism New Korean Kurdish Lithuanian Malay Māori Mexican Middle Eastern Mongolian Montenegrin Nigerian Pakistani Palestinians Pashtun Polish Portuguese Quebec Romani Romanian Russian Scottish Serb Slavic Somali Spanish Tatar Thai Turkish Ukrainian Uyghur Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh
Manifestations Anti-LGBTQ rhetoric SPLC-designated list of anti-LGBTQ hate groups Anti-LGBTQ movement in the US Anti-trans movement in the UK Anti-Zionism Blood libel Bullying Cancel culture Capital punishment for homosexuality Compulsory sterilization Corrective rape Counter-jihad Cultural genocide Defamation Democide Disability hate crime Dog whistle Domicide Economic Education Employment Eliminationism Enemy of the people Ethnic cleansing Ethnic conflict Ethnic hatred Ethnic joke Ethnocide Excellence Gender-based dress codes Cosmetics policy High heel policy Forced conversion Freak show Gay bashing Gendercide Genital modification and mutilation Genocide examples Glass ceiling Hate crime Violence against LGBTQ people Hate group Hate speech Homeless dumping Housing Indian rolling Kill Haole Day Lavender scare LGBTQ+ grooming conspiracy theory List of people killed for being transgender Lynching Mortgage Murder music Native American mascots Occupational segregation Opposition to immigration Paper genocide Persecution Pogrom Political repression Purge Racialization Religious persecution Religious terrorism Religious violence Religious war Scapegoating Segregation academy Sentencing disparity Sexual harassment Sex-selective abortion Slut-shaming Trans bashing Victimisation Violence against women White flight White genocide conspiracy theory Wife selling Witch hunt
Policies Age of candidacy Blood purity Blood quantum Crime of apartheid Disabilities Catholic Jewish Gender pay gap Gender roles Transphobia in the US House of Representatives Gerontocracy Gerrymandering Ghetto benches Internment Jewish quota Law for Protection of the Nation LGBTQ rights opposition MSM blood donation restrictions No kid zone Numerus clausus (as religious or racial quota) One-drop rule Racial quota Racial segregation Jim Crow laws Nuremberg Laws Racial steering Redlining Same-sex marriage (laws and issues prohibiting) Segregation age racial religious sexual Social exclusion Sodomy law State atheism State religion Ugly law Voter suppression
Countermeasures Affirmative action Anti-discrimination law Anti-racism Constitutional colorblindness Cultural assimilation Cultural pluralism Diversity, equity, and inclusion Diversity training Empowerment Fat acceptance movement Feminism Fighting Discrimination Hate speech laws by country Human rights Intersex human rights LGBT rights Nonviolence Racial integration Reappropriation Self-determination Social integration Toleration
Related topics Allophilia Amatonormativity Bias Cisnormativity Civil liberties Criminalization of homosexuality Dehumanization Diversity Multiculturalism Neurodiversity Ethnic penalty Figleaf Gender-blind Heteronormativity Historical eugenics Internalized oppression Intersectionality Masculism Medical model of disability autism Net bias Oikophobia Oppression Police brutality Political correctness Polyculturalism Power distance Prejudice Prisoner abuse Racial bias in criminal news in the United States Racism by country Racial color blindness Religious intolerance Reverse discrimination Reverse racism Second-generation gender bias Snobbery Social equity Social exclusion Social identity threat Social model of disability Social privilege Christian male white Social stigma Speciesism Stereotype threat The talk
v t e

The neurodiversity paradigm is a framework for understanding human brain function that recognizes the diversity within sensory processing, motor abilities, social comfort, cognition, and focus as neurobiological differences. This diversity falls on a spectrum of neurocognitive differences. The neurodiversity paradigm argues that diversity in neurocognition is part of humanity and that some neurodivergences generally classified as disorders, such as autism, are differences and disabilities that are not necessarily pathological. Neurotypical individuals are those who fall within the average range of functioning and thinking.

The neurodiversity movement started in the late 1980s and early 1990s with the start of Autism Network International. Much of the correspondence that led to the formation of the movement happened over autism conferences, namely the autistic-led autreat, penpal lists, and Usenet. The framework grew out of the disability rights movement and builds on the social model of disability, arguing that disability partly arises from societal barriers and person-environment mismatch, rather than attributing disability purely to inherent deficits. It instead situates human cognitive variation in the context of biodiversity and the politics of minority groups. Some neurodiversity advocates and researchers including Judy Singer and Patrick Dwyer argue that the neurodiversity paradigm is the middle ground between a strong medical model and a strong social model.

Neurodivergent individuals face unique challenges in education and the workplace. The efficacy of accessibility and support programs in career development and higher education depends on the individual. Social media has introduced a platform where neurodiversity awareness and support has emerged, further promoting the neurodiversity movement.

The neurodiversity paradigm has been controversial among disability advocates especially proponents of medical model, with opponents arguing it risks downplaying the suffering associated with some disabilities, and that it calls for the acceptance of things some would wish to be treated. In recent years, to address these concerns, some neurodiversity advocates and researchers have attempted to reconcile different seemingly contradictory but arguably partially compatible perspectives, and some researchers have advocated for mixed or integrative approaches that involve both neurodiversity approaches and biomedical interventions or advancements.

History

The word neurodiversity first appeared in publication in 1998, in an article by American journalist Harvey Blume, as a portmanteau of the words neurological diversity, which had been used as early as 1996 in online spaces such as InLv to describe the growing concept of a natural diversity in humanity's neurological expression. The same year, it was published in Judy Singer's sociology honors thesis, drawing on discussions on the independent living mailing list that included Blume. Singer has described herself as "likely somewhere on the autistic spectrum".

Blume was an early advocate who predicted the role the Internet would play in fostering the international neurodiversity movement. In a New York Times piece on June 30, 1997, Blume described the foundation of neurodiversity using the term neurological pluralism. Some authors also credit the earlier work of autistic advocate Jim Sinclair in laying the foundation for the movement. Sinclair's 1993 speech "Don't Mourn For Us" emphasized autism as a way of being, claiming "it is not possible to separate the person from the autism."

The Neurodiversity Movement grew largely from online interaction. The internet's design lent well to the needs of many autistic people. People socialized over listservs and IRCs. Some of the websites used for organizing in the Neurodiversity Movement's early days include sites like Autistics.Org and Autistic People Against Neuroleptic Abuse. Core principles were developed from there. Principles such as advocating for the rights and autonomy of all people with brain disabilities with a focus on autism. The main conflicts from the beginning were about who the real experts on autism are, what causes autism, what treatments are appropriate, and who gets to call themselves autistic. During the 2000s, people started blogs such as Mel Baggs' Ballastexistenz and Kevin Leitch's Left Brain Right Brain. Eventually, Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN) was started by Ari Ne'eman and Scott Robertson to further align the Neurodiversity Movement with the greater disability rights movement. ASAN led the Ransom Notes Campaign to successfully remove stigmatizing disability ads posted by the NYU Child Study Center. This was a massive turning point for the Neurodiversity Movement.

From there, the Neurodiversity Movement continued to grow with the formation of more organizations in the early 2010s such as Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network and The Thinking Person's Guide to Autism. More autistic people were appointed to federal advisory boards like Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee and National Council on Disability. There were various campaigns like the ongoing #StopTheShock related to the use of aversive treatment at Judge Rotenberg Center and various protests against Autism Speaks. Various flashblogs popped up during the 2010s to support campaigns. Annual traditions were formed such as Disability Day of Mourning and Autistics Speaking Day.

Damian Milton notes that, in 2014, Nick Walker attempted to define neurodiversity, the neurodiversity movement, and the neurodiversity paradigm. Walker tied neurodiversity to the idea that "all brains are to a degree unique". She also defined the movement as a rights movement, and the paradigm as a broader discussion of diversity, cultural constructions and social dynamics.

In recent years, the concept of neurodiversity and many related findings have gained traction among many members of the scientific community, who have argued that autism researchers have sometimes been too ready to interpret differences as deficits. It has also been suggested that there are both ethical issues and practical risks in attempting to reduce or suppress some autistic traits (e.g. some stimming behaviors that do not result in self injury, special interests) that can sometimes be adaptive or instilling neurotypical behaviors (e.g. eye contact, body language) through interventions. Researchers and advocates are concerned about such issues and risks as most recent studies and multiple systematic reviews have indicated that higher levels of masking, passing as neurotypical, or camouflaging are generally associated with poorer mental health outcomes including depression, clinical anxiety, and suicidality among autistic people (including children, adolescents, and adults) and across various regions or cultures. In addition, two reviews published in 2024 indicated some forms of repetitive behaviors can be adaptive for sensory regulation and emotional regulation of some autistic people, and masking or suppressing some autistic repetitive behaviors that can be adaptive may risk worsening mental health and well-being. One multiple-year longitudinal study found that autistic children who showed decrease in repetitive behaviors experienced more severe and worsening in mental health symptoms, whereas autistic children who showed increase in repetitive behaviors experienced less severe mental health symptoms. Relatedly, qualitative studies have shown some forms of behavioral interventions increase camouflaging or masking of autistic traits (e.g. stimming) for some autistic people, with negative effects on mental health.

Moreover, researchers have found that psychoeducation based on the medical model is associated with higher stigma. Similarly, some researchers and advocates also argue that a medicalizing approach can contribute to stigma and ableism, and that the persistent focus on biological research in autism based on deficit-based medical model is at odds with the priorities of those in the autism community.

Autistic self-advocate and researcher Ari Ne'eman has suggested a trait-based approach, where elements of the medical (or pathology) model can be applied in treating certain traits, behaviors, or conditions that are intrinsically harmful (e.g. self-injury behaviors, epilepsy, or other co-occurring health conditions), while neurodiversity approaches can be applied to non-harmful or sometimes adaptive autistic traits (e.g. some stimming behaviors that do not result in self-injury, intense interests) of the same individual. Relatedly, some neurodiversity researchers, as well as autistic people, advocates and researchers, have advocated for application and sometimes integration or combination of both neurodiversity approaches and biomedical research plus practice.

In recent years, researchers and neurodivergent people have advocated for more neurodiversity-affirming interventions, with both new intervention strategies being developed and reforms of existing intervention strategies informed by voices from autistic people and neurodiversity approaches. In addition, some researchers and advocates have called for more neurodiversity-affirming psychoeducation and stigma reduction methods.

Neurodivergent

Following the rise of the autism rights movement in the 1990s, many autistic advocates, including Kassiane Asasumasu, recognized that a wide variety of people experienced the world in ways similar to autistic people, despite not being autistic. As a result, Asasumasu coined the related terms neurodivergent and neurodivergence circa 2000.

According to Asasumasu, neurodivergent/neurodivergence refers to those "whose neurocognitive functioning diverges from dominant societal norms in multiple ways". She intended for these terms to apply to a broad variety of people, not just people with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and dyslexia. She further emphasized that it should not be used to exclude people but rather to include them. This term provided activists a way to advocate increased rights and accessibility for non-autistic people who do not have typical neurocognitive functioning.

Neurodivergent has been used in multiple ways since Asasumasu's conception, especially to refer specifically to individuals diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders. It is also used as an umbrella term to describe people with atypical mental and behavioral traits, such as mood, anxiety, dissociative, psychotic, personality, and eating disorders. Under the neurodiversity framework, these conditions are often referred to as "neurodivergencies", in an effort to move away from the medical model of disability (sometimes referred to in the neurodiversity community as the "pathology paradigm").

Alternative terms used for neurodiversity

Advocates within the neurodiversity movements have also coined other alternative neologisms that people use to refer to themselves with the goal to remove the stigma of the medicalized view of neurodiversity. These terms, such as neurospicy are often used instead of neurodivergent by people when referring to themself.

Neurotypical or neuroconforming

Neurotypical (an abbreviation of neurologically typical, sometimes NT) is a neologism widely used in the neurodiversity movement as a label for anyone who has a neurotype that fits into the norm of thinking patterns. Thus, the term "neurotypical" includes anyone who is not autistic, and does not have ADHD, dyslexia, anxiety, or any other condition that would be considered neurodivergent. The term has been adopted by both the neurodiversity movement and some members of the scientific community.

In contrast to some of the shortcomings of terms like 'neurotypical' (such as its underlying assumption that neurodivergent experiences are an anomaly, i.e. not typical), a growing group of advocates in the neurodivergent movement prefer other terms such as "neuroconforming".

Term

Modern neuroscientists such as writer Mo Costandi view terms like "neurotypical" as not being of use in neuroscience.

Early definitions described neurotypicals as individuals who do not have autism and do not meet the criteria to be diagnosed with autism. Early uses of NT were often satirical, as in the Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical, but it has been adopted by the neurodiversity movement too, and is now used in a serious manner.

People with any form of neurocognitive or mental disorder, whether congenital or acquired, have also sometimes been excluded from the neurotypical label, particularly in academic studies for specific disorders that use neurotypical control groups. In this sense, the term is now contrasted to neurodivergent.

Some people prefer the term allistic, which unambiguously means "not autistic".

The National Autistic Society of the United Kingdom describes the word as "mainly used by autistic people so may not be applicable in, for example, the popular press".

Double empathy problem theory

The theory of the double empathy problem argues that autistic people do not inherently lack empathy as often supposed by people who see autism as pathological. Rather, the experiences of autistic and non-autistic people are so different that it is hard for one to understand how the other thinks and empathize with each other; for example, non-autistic people may not understand when an autistic person is overwhelmed.

It was originally conceived in 2012 by autistic scholar Damian Milton. One study comparing the conversations and socialization of autistic groups, non-autistic groups, and mixed groups found that autistic people were more able to build rapport with other autistic people than with non-autistic people, and at a level similar to the purely non-autistic group.

The double empathy problem theory implies there is no simple fix that can help each group better empathize with each other, but it is worthwhile to bridge the double empathy gap through more equal contact and enhancing public understanding and empathy about autistic people based on neurodiversity-affirming approaches. The advantage of the theory is reducing pathologization of autistic people by identifying that everyone struggles to empathize with different neurotypes. It can also help neurotypical individuals to better understand how neurodivergent people think and empathize and to recognize their own limitations in empathizing with autistic people. Jaswal and Akhtar (2019) highlight the difference between being socially uninterested and appearing socially uninterested, and challenge preconceived notions of a lack of social motivation. For example, testimonies from autistic individuals report that avoiding eye contact serves an important function of helping them to concentrate during conversation, and should not be interpreted as expressing social disinterest.

Within disability rights movements

Neurodiversity paradigm
Philosophy Autism rights movement Bodily autonomy Disability rights movement Independent living movement Self-advocacy
Organizations Aspies For Freedom Autism Network International Autistic Self Advocacy Network National Autistic Society
Events Autism Acceptance Day & Month Autism History Month Autistic Pride Day Autscape Disability Day of Mourning Neurodiversity Celebration Week Weird Pride Day
Issues Ableism Anti-autism All in a Row Applied behavior analysis Augmentative and alternative communication Autism-friendly Autism Speaks Communication Shutdown Community integration Controversies in autism Deinstitutionalisation Disability-selective abortion Double empathy problem Employment Ethical challenges to autism treatment Eugenics Facilitated communication Filicide Inclusion in education Inclusion as a right Judge Rotenberg Center Neurodiversity and labor rights Social model of disability Societal and cultural aspects of autism Universal Design for Learning Violence
People Alex Plank Ari Ne'eman Damian Milton Daniel Lightwing Devon Price Donna Williams govy Greta Thunberg Jim Sinclair John Elder Robison Josef Schovanec Judy Singer Julia Bascom Lydia Brown Mel Baggs Michelle Dawson Morénike Giwa Onaiwu Morton Ann Gernsbacher Nick Walker Robert Chapman Roy Richard Grinker Shain Neumeier Stephen Shore Steve Silberman Temple Grandin William Davenport M. Remi Yergeau
Films Citizen Autistic Deej Loving Lampposts Neurotypical
Criticism Pro-cure perspective National Council on Severe Autism Matthew Belmonte Manuel Casanova Jill Escher Michael Fitzpatrick Bruce Hall David Miedzianik Jonathan Mitchell Alysson Muotri Jonathan Shestack Alison Singer
v t e

The neurodiversity paradigm was developed and embraced first by autistic people, but has been applied to other conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), developmental speech disorders, dyslexia, dysgraphia, dyspraxia, dyscalculia, dysnomia, intellectual disability, obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), Tourette syndrome, and sometimes mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and, somewhat more controversially, personality disorders such as antisocial personality disorder. Neurodiversity advocates who support those with autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and other neurodevelopmental disorders do not agree in framing medical interventions as a way to "cure" or "fix" these individuals. Rather, they promote support systems such as inclusion-focused services, accommodations, communication and assistive technologies, occupational training, and independent living support. The intention is for individuals to receive support that honors human diversity and feel that they are able to freely express themselves. Other forms of treatment may cause them to feel as though they are being coerced or forced to adapt to social norms, or to conform to a behavioral standard or clinical ideal.

Proponents of neurodiversity strive to reconceptualize autism and related conditions in society by acknowledging that neurodiversity does not require a cure, changing the language from the current "condition, disease, disorder, or illness"-based nomenclature, "broadening the understanding of healthy or independent living", acknowledging new types of autonomy, and giving neurodivergent individuals more control over their treatment, including the type, timing, and whether there should be treatment at all.

Activists such as Jennifer White-Johnson have helped bring attention to the neurodiversity movement, by creating symbols of protest and recognition, including a combination of the black power fist and infinity symbol.

A 2009 study separated 27 students with conditions including autism, dyslexia, developmental coordination disorder, ADHD, and having suffered a stroke into two categories of self-view: "A 'difference' view—where neurodiversity was seen as a difference incorporating a set of strengths and weaknesses, or a 'medical/deficit' view—where neurodiversity was seen as a disadvantageous medical condition". They found that, although all of the students reported uniformly difficult schooling careers involving exclusion, abuse, and bullying, those who viewed themselves from the "difference" view (41% of the study cohort) "indicated higher academic self-esteem and confidence in their abilities and many (73%) expressed considerable career ambitions with positive and clear goals". Many of these students reported gaining this view of themselves through contact with neurodiversity advocates in online support groups.

A 2013 online survey which aimed to assess conceptions of autism and neurodiversity suggested that conception of autism as a difference, and not a deficit, is developmentally beneficial and "transcend a false dichotomy between celebrating differences and ameliorating deficit".

Neurodiversity advocate John Elder Robison argues that the disabilities and strengths conferred by neurological differences may be mutually inseparable. "When 99 neurologically identical people fail to solve a problem, it's often the 1% fellow who's different who holds the key. Yet that person may be disabled or disadvantaged most or all of the time. To neurodiversity proponents, people are disabled because they are at the edges of the bell curve, not because they are sick or broken."

Higher education

There are several models that are used to understand disability within the spectrum of neurodiversity. There is the medical model of disability that views people as needing to be treated or cured. Another model is the social model of disability, which puts emphasis on the way that society treats people with disabilities. Through the social model of disability, the experiences of neurodivergent students in higher education is partially influenced by the reactions and attitudes of other students and the institution itself.

Experiences of neurodivergent students

The emotional experiences of neurodivergent students in higher education depend on a combination of factors, including the type of disability, the level of impairment, and the student's access to resources and accommodations. A common difficulty for neurodivergent students is maintaining social relationships, which can give rise to loneliness, anxiety, and depression. There is also the added stress and difficulty of transitioning into higher education, as well as the responsibilities and task management required in college. Many neurodivergent students may find that they need added support. As for academics, neurodivergent students may experience difficulties in learning, executive function, managing peer relationships in the classroom or in group work, and other impairments that can affect academic performance and success in higher education. However, neurodivergent students may find that their differences are a strength and an integral part of their new social roles as adults.

Higher education institutions

The typical curriculum and format of higher education may pose as a challenge for neurodivergent students, and a lack of support and flexibility from staff may further complicate the university experience. Thus, reasonable adjustments are available to students who disclose their disabilities. However, these adjustments or accommodations may put an emphasis on academics, and less on the various challenges of higher education on neurodivergent students. For instance, neurodivergent students in higher education also report a need for non-academic supports, such as social mentorships and resources for strength-based interventions in order to further assist neurodivergent students in the social aspects of college life. Similarly, career preparation that is specifically targeted for neurodivergent students is lacking. There are several programs, such as supported employment, that exist to help assist neurodivergent individuals in finding and obtaining a job. However, many of these programs do not exist in schools. This can make it difficult for neurodivergent students to find a career path that they feel is attainable for them. Another consideration is the implementation of a universal design approach (UDL) when building learning spaces or communal areas that considers the needs of neurodivergent students. A UDL design incorporates a design that accommodates the needs of all students, including the neurodivergent population.

According to an article published in 2023, universities and post-secondary establishments would show more tolerance towards neurodivergent people. A tolerant environment can increase autonomy, leading to kindness and understanding among students. Higher education institutions offer counseling and support services to students. However, neurodivergent students face particular challenges that impair their ability to receive consistent support and care. Additionally, counseling and support services face a lack of funding, personnel, and specialists that can adequately support neurodivergent students. Overall, these services work for some students and not for others.

Nachman and colleagues reviewed several articles published by two-year community colleges and found some discrepancies in the way that they perceived and categorized "disabled" students and "non-disabled" students. They found that all of the articles were attempting to normalize disability. Many of them put distinct separation between typical and atypical learners as well as their potential academic achievement. Nachman also found that many of the articles showed a lack of autonomy for neurodivergent students. They had little power in regard to academic choices and classroom management.

In the workplace

Neurodivergent individuals are subjected to bias when applying and interviewing for job positions. Specifically, neurodivergent individuals can have their social engagement style compared to neurotypical individuals, which can affect their ability to obtain a job position. Stigmas against neurodivergence (especially against autistic individuals) and cognition challenges in social situations can hinder an individual's ability to perform well in a traditional job interview. Organizations such as Specialisterne aim to use neurodivergent employees' particular skills – such as pattern recognition, detection of deviations, attention to detail, analytical thinking, and extended focus – in the workforce, as well as educate companies on supporting neurodivergent employees.

In a systematic review that considered developmental dyslexia as "an expression of neurodiversity", it was suggested that neurodiversity is not yet an established concept in the workplace, and therefore, support from social relationships and work accommodations is minimal. Furthermore, another systematic review that focused on pharmacological and combined pharmacological/psychosocial interventions for adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder found that there were few workplace-based intervention studies, and suggested that additional research needs to be conducted to figure out how to best support neurodivergent employees in the workplace.

A study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic suggested that neurodivergent individuals would benefit from remote work as it allowed them to engage in their interests, but that social engagement is still necessary for productivity and performance. Another study supported these findings and stressed the need for redesigned work and social conditions to be more inclusive for individuals with autism.

In social media

The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (August 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The increase of representation of the neurodiversity movement in the media came about with changes in the technology of the media platforms themselves. The recent addition of text-based options on various social media sites allow disabled users to communicate, enjoy, and share at a more accessible rate. Social media has a two-fold benefit to the neurodivergent community: it can help spread awareness and pioneer the neurodiversity movement, and it can also allow members of the communities themselves to connect.

Social media as a platform

Media platforms allow the connection of individuals of similar backgrounds to find a community of support with one another. Online networking and connections allows for the user to decide their level of comfort with interactions, and allow them to retain control of a relationship with another user. For the neurodivergent community, the use of social media to create relationships has proven a useful tool for those with difficulty in social situations. By connecting neurodivergent users, media platforms provide "safe spaces" that are helpful in forming relationships. Some media developers have created platforms such as Blossom, which are designed specifically to connect neurodivergent users and families.

Social media as a driving force

Social media also allows users to spread awareness about the neurodiversity movement. Increasing awareness about disorders has been shown to increase the amount of factual information spread. The spread of information through social media exposure can assist the neurodiversity movement in educating the public about understanding disabilities such as autism and sifting out misinformation. By sharing neurodivergent experiences from a first hand perspective, social media can educate the public and destigmatize certain disorders, but negative portrayals of neurodivergence can have an obstructive impact on members of the community.

Challenges within media

Although representation of the neurodivergent community has grown with the help of social media platforms, those users are often criticized and misunderstood. Social media has not entirely removed the social barriers that restrict inclusion of neurodivergent people. Some have reported needing to conform to the mainstream view of their disability to be seen as "authentic" users. Doing so has indirectly made it more difficult for neurodivergent users to grow platforms. Non-disabled users evaluating the authenticity of neurodivergent users based on stereotypes shows that the neurodiversity movement has not reached its goal of inclusion.

Clinical setting

Medicine and healthcare

Medical and healthcare professionals have begun to acknowledge neurodivergence among employees. Specifically, more groups are being created that are centered around advocacy and peer support among medical and healthcare professionals who associate themselves with neurodiversity, such as the Autistic Doctors International created by Dr. Mary Doherty. Another approach is the implementation of a 5-minute video summary (5MVS) for medical learners and physicians who have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It consists of a 5-minute recorded video summary in which an engaging speaker presents the relevant information from a scientific article about ADHD using a brief PowerPoint presentation shared using videoconferencing technology. The researchers state that providing this educational tool for helping medical learners and physicians with ADHD acquire relevant information from scientific articles could help in addressing their inattention, impulsivity or hyperactivity, and improve their development of critical appraisal skills when working in healthcare.

Similarly, healthcare systems may benefit from hiring neurodivergent individuals to gain a unique perspective when caring for patients. Some healthcare staff agree that inviting neurodivergent individuals to join patient advisory groups or hiring them as staff are essential steps to acceptance and integration in the workforce. Neurodivergent people's unique strengths can be vital to health system innovation and improvement efforts. One example of the push toward this is the Stanford Neurodiversity Project, in which one of their goals is to discover the strengths of neurodivergent individuals and make use of their talents to increase innovation and productivity of their society, such as working in the field of healthcare and medicine.

Neurodiversity has also recently been investigated as a new way of working within neurodevelopmental clinics in the UK. A team of researchers in Portsmouth, England, have created an approach in aiding neurodivergent individuals known as PANDA, or the Portsmouth Alliance Neurodiversity Approach. This approach may help medical and healthcare professionals facilitate understanding, communication and early support for children who may identify as being neurodivergent.

Therapy

Neurodiversity and the role it plays in therapeutic settings has been a central focal point in recent years. Many therapists and mental health professionals have pushed for more inclusive psychotherapeutic frameworks appropriate for neurodivergent individuals. One example is neurodivergence-informed therapy, which reframes dysfunction as interconnectedness among society rather than strictly individual, advocating for acceptance and pride in the neurodiversity community, and the push for therapists to pursue humility regarding the knowledge and education associated with individuals who identify as neurodivergent. Similarly, neurodiversity affirming therapy supports neurodivergent differences, rather than viewing them as something that should be "cured", and to offer ways to support the individual with difficult areas, while still appreciating their needs and strengths.

Therapeutic programs and interventions are also being investigated for the neurodivergent community. Self-determination programs to help neurodivergent individuals achieve goals in their life has been founded to be successful, with neurodivergent participants finding it to be "appropriate, acceptable, and feasible". Various approaches (e.g., eye-tracking, longitudinal data, computational modeling) in understanding perceptual decision-making in neurodivergent individuals are also being studied and the implications it may have in the therapeutic environment in working with the neurodivergent population.

Another form of therapeutic intervention in that has been investigated in neurodivergent individuals is the use of Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs). NDBIs have been shown to have positive effects on language and social-communication while, at the same time, respecting individuals’ needs and autonomy. One of the key goals in this type of intervention is putting the focus of therapy on the neurodivergent individual themselves in the creation of intervention goals, procedures, and outcomes. In doing so, they are likely to be seen as more acceptable, useful, and effective to that individual.

In addition to support from neurodiversity advocates for affirming therapies, concerns have been raised about the role of certain approaches such as applied behavior analysis. Neurodivergent individuals and activists tend to emphasize the tendency of these interventions to set a goals-focused approach that, to a neurodivergent patient, might seem to center societal participation rather than the goals of the individual. In this sense, concerns from neurodivergent individuals tends to argue that these interventions aim to enforce conformity with expectations of society rather than addressing the needs of the person receiving the treatment. While a large body of research on the role of ABA seems to support its efficacy in long term cognitive and behavioral outcomes, there remains concerns regarding long-term mental health impacts and with the measures used in determining social validity by those who have raised these concerns. In addition to advocates from within the neurodivergent community, some behavioral analysts have begun to reconsider the role of these therapies with the context of a neurodiversity framework.

Reception and controversies

The neurodiversity paradigm is controversial in autism advocacy. The dominant paradigm, the medical model of disability holds that neurodivergent individuals have medical conditions which should be treated. The neurodiversity paradigm, under the understanding that differences in neural function are natural variations in function, suggests that not all conditions that would be classified as neurodivergent need medical intervention. A prevalent criticism about application of the neurodiversity paradigm to autism comes from the understanding that – even with a framework of natural variance that neurodiversity includes – individuals with functional difficulties would continue to have challenges. Some critics of the neurodiversity paradigm, such as family members that are responsible for the care of an autistic individual, consider it detached from the needs of individuals that would continue to be functionally disabled through the frame of natural variation. The neurodiversity movement has also been stated to have similarities with phrenology.

A common criticism is that the neurodiversity paradigm is too widely encompassing and that its conception should exclude those whose functioning is more severely impaired. In response, autistic advocate Nick Walker suggested that neurodiversity refers specifically to "pervasive neurocognitive differences intimately related to the formation and constitution of the self", in contrast to medical conditions such as epilepsy.

"Critiques of the Neurodiversity Movement", a 2020 review, raised two concerns regarding the term neurotypical:

• Many people who do not have an autism diagnosis have autistic traits (known by researchers as the "broad autism phenotype"), so there is no clear bimodal distribution separating people with and without autism. In reality there are not two distinct populations, one "neurotypical" and one "neurodivergent".
• "Neurotypical" was a dubious construct, because there is nobody who could be considered truly neurotypical, and there is no such standard for the human brain. The latter, in turn, has been said by Nick Walker to reflect a misunderstanding of the term.

See also

• Autistic Pride Day
• Mad pride
• Neuroinclusive design
• Psychiatric survivors movement
• The Myth of Mental Illness
• Neuroqueer theory

References

1. Kapp SK, ed. (2020). Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0. ISBN 978-981-13-8436-3.
2. ^ Botha M, Chapman R, Giwa Onaiwu M, Kapp SK, Stannard Ashley A, Walker N (March 12, 2024). "The neurodiversity concept was developed collectively: An overdue correction on the origins of neurodiversity theory". Autism. 28 (6): 1591–1594. doi:10.1177/13623613241237871. PMID 38470140.
3. Manalili MA, Pearson A, Sulik J, Creechan L, Elsherif M, Murkumbi I, et al. (February 2023). "From Puzzle to Progress: How Engaging With Neurodiversity Can Improve Cognitive Science". Cognitive Science. 47 (2): e13255. doi:10.1111/cogs.13255. PMC 7616419. PMID 36807910.
4. "Reflections on the Neurodiversity Paradigm: What is Neurodiversity?". Reflections on the Neurodiversity Paradigm. Archived from the original on April 1, 2023. Retrieved April 12, 2022.
5. Singer J (July 3, 2016). NeuroDiversity: The Birth of an Idea (2nd ed.). Kindle Ebook. ISBN 978-0-6481547-0-9.
6. Dwyer P (May 2022). "The Neurodiversity Approach(es): What Are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers?". Human Development. 66 (2): 73–92. doi:10.1159/000523723. PMC 9261839. PMID 36158596.
7. Oliver M, Sapey B (2006). Social work with disabled people (3rd ed.). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 1-4039-1838-4. OCLC 62326930.
8. ^ Chapman R (January 10, 2019). "Neurodiversity Theory and Its Discontents: Autism, Schizophrenia, and the Social Model of Disability". In Tekin S, Bluhm R (eds.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry. Bloomsbury. pp. 371–387. ISBN 978-1-350-02406-9. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
9. ^ Clouder L, Karakus M, Cinotti A, Ferreyra MV, Fierros GA, Rojo P (October 2020). "Neurodiversity in higher education: a narrative synthesis". Higher Education. 80 (4): 757–778. doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00513-6.
10. ^ Densberger K (2021). "Book Review: Supporting Neurodiverse College Student Success: A Guide for Librarians, Student Support Services, and Academic Learning Environments". The Learning Assistance Review. 26 (2). Gale A679898761.
11. Opar A (May 6, 2019). "A medical condition or just a difference? The question roils autism community". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 9, 2019. Retrieved May 12, 2019.
12. Robison JE. "The Controversy Around Autism and Neurodiversity". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on March 22, 2023. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
13. Mcgee M (August 2012). "Neurodiversity". Contexts. 11 (3): 12–13. doi:10.1177/1536504212456175.
14. Sarrett JC (April 2016). "Biocertification and Neurodiversity: the Role and Implications of Self-Diagnosis in Autistic Communities". Neuroethics. 9 (1): 23–36. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9247-x.
15. Bailin A. "Clearing Up Some Misconceptions about Neurodiversity". Scientific American Blog Network. Archived from the original on June 29, 2019. Retrieved April 12, 2022.
16. ^ Dwyer P (2022). "The Neurodiversity Approach(es): What Are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers?". Human Development. 66 (2): 73–92. doi:10.1159/000523723. PMC 9261839. PMID 36158596.
17. ^ Dwyer P, Gurba AN, Kapp SK, Kilgallon E, Hersh LH, Chang DS, et al. (September 18, 2024). "Community views of neurodiversity, models of disability and autism intervention: Mixed methods reveal shared goals and key tensions". Autism. doi:10.1177/13623613241273029. PMID 39291753.
18. ^ Heraty S, Lautarescu A, Belton D, Boyle A, Cirrincione P, Doherty M, et al. (August 2023). "Bridge-building between communities: Imagining the future of biomedical autism research". Cell. 186 (18): 3747–3752. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.004. PMID 37657415.
19. ^ Bölte S, Lawson WB, Marschik PB, Girdler S (September 2021). "Reconciling the seemingly irreconcilable: The WHO's ICF system integrates biological and psychosocial environmental determinants of autism and ADHD: The International Classification of Functioning (ICF) allows to model opposed biomedical and neurodiverse views of autism and ADHD within one framework". BioEssays. 43 (9): e2000254. doi:10.1002/bies.202000254. PMID 33797095.
20. ^ Fletcher-Watson S (October 28, 2022). "Its time to embrace autistic expertise". Medium.
21. Leblond CS, Rolland T, Barthome E, Mougin Z, Fleury M, Ecker C, et al. (2024). "A Genetic Bridge Between Medicine and Neurodiversity for Autism". Annual Review of Genetics. 58 (1): 487–512. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111523-102614. PMID 39585908.
22. https://www.forbes.com/sites/drnancydoyle/2022/01/31/in-defense-of-the-medical-model-of-neurodiversity/
23. Blume H (September 30, 1998). "Neurodiversity". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on January 5, 2013. Retrieved March 12, 2024.
24. ^ "Meet Judy Singer Neurodiversity Pioneer". My Spectrum Suite. Archived from the original on June 6, 2019. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
25. Singer J (February 1, 1999). "'Why can't you be normal for once in your life?' From a 'problem with no name' to the emergence of a new category of difference". In Corker M, French S (eds.). Disability Discourse. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). pp. 59–67. ISBN 978-0-335-20222-5. Archived from the original on May 13, 2024. Retrieved May 12, 2020. For me, the key significance of the 'autism spectrum' lies in its call for and anticipation of a politics of neurological diversity, or neurodiversity.
26. Dekker M (November 8, 2019). "From Exclusion to Acceptance: Independent Living on the Autistic Spectrum". Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement. Singapore: Springer Singapore. pp. 41–49. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0_3. ISBN 978-981-13-8436-3.
27. Blume H (July 1, 1997). ""Autism & The Internet" or "It's The Wiring, Stupid"". Media In Transition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Archived from the original on April 27, 2018. Retrieved November 8, 2007. A project called CyberSpace 2000 is devoted to getting as many people as possible in the autistic spectrum hooked up by the year 2000, the reason being that "the Internet is an essential means for autistic people to improve their lives because it is often the only way they can communicate effectively."
28. Blume H (June 30, 1997). "Autistics, freed from face-to-face encounters, are communicating in cyberspace". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 26, 2008. Retrieved November 8, 2007. Yet, in trying to come to terms with world, autistics are neither willing nor able to give up their own customs. Instead, they are proposing a new social compact, one emphasizing neurological pluralism. The consensus emerging from the Internet forums and Web sites where autistics congregate is that NT is only one of many neurological configurations – the dominant one certainly, but not necessarily the best.
29. Dinh A (2024). Don't Mourn for Us: The Autistic Life of Jim Sinclair and an Extraordinary Story of Neurodiversity. Independently published. ISBN 979-8338157381.
30. Solomon A (May 25, 2008). "The autism rights movement". New York. Archived from the original on May 27, 2008. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
31. ^ Fenton A, Krahn T (2007). "Autism, neurodiversity and equality beyond the 'normal'". Journal of Ethics in Mental Health. 2 (2): 1–6.
32. Sinclair, Jim. Don't Mourn For Us. Archived November 9, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Autism Network International. Retrieved May 7, 2013.
33. Dekker M (1999). "On Our Own Terms: Emerging autistic culture" (PDF). Autscape99. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 24, 2024.
34. "Autistics.Org". 1998. Archived from the original on June 25, 2004.
35. Tisoncik LA (2020), Kapp SK (ed.), "Autistics.Org and Finding Our Voices as an Activist Movement", Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement: Stories from the Frontline, Singapore: Springer, pp. 65–76, doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0_5, ISBN 978-981-13-8437-0
36. Andrews D (1998). "Autistic People Against Neuroleptic Abuse". Archived from the original on April 3, 2005.
37. Murray D (2020), Kapp SK (ed.), "Autistic People Against Neuroleptic Abuse", Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement: Stories from the Frontline, Singapore: Springer, pp. 51–63, doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0_4, ISBN 978-981-13-8437-0
38. Ira Eidle (August 12, 2021). Introduction to the Neurodiversity Movement. Retrieved May 17, 2024 – via YouTube.
39. "Ballastexistenz". Ballastexistenz. March 9, 2018. Retrieved May 17, 2024.
40. Leitch K (2003). "Left Brain Right Brain". Archived from the original on May 12, 2024. Retrieved May 16, 2024.
41. "Victory! The End of the Ransom Notes Campaign - Autistic Self Advocacy Network". autisticadvocacy.org/. December 19, 2007. Retrieved May 17, 2024.
42. Kaufman J (December 20, 2007). "Ransom-Note Ads About Children's Health Are Canceled". The New York Times. Retrieved May 17, 2024.
43. Kras JF (December 14, 2009). "The 'Ransom Notes' Affair: When the Neurodiversity Movement Came of Age". Disability Studies Quarterly. 30 (1). doi:10.18061/dsq.v30i1.1065.
44. "Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network (AWN)". awnnetwork.org/. Retrieved May 17, 2024.
45. "THINKING PERSON'S GUIDE TO AUTISM". THINKING PERSON'S GUIDE TO AUTISM. May 12, 2024. Retrieved May 17, 2024.
46. "#IAmNOTKelliStapleton #WalkInIssysShoes Flash Blog". iamnotkellistapletonflashblog.blogspot.com. Retrieved May 17, 2024.
47. "Crusading Against Hate: Why I #BoycottAutismspeaks". Crusading Against Hate: Why I #BoycottAutismspeaks. July 18, 2015. Retrieved May 17, 2024.
48. "Disability Day of Mourning – Remembering the Disabled Murdered by Caregivers". Retrieved May 17, 2024.
49. "Autistics Speaking Day". autisticsspeakingday.blogspot.com. Retrieved May 17, 2024.
50. Milton D (2020). "Neurodiversity past and present – an introduction to the neurodiversity reader.". In Milton D, Ridout S, Martin N, Mills R, Murray D (eds.). The Neurodiversity Reader. Pavilion. pp. 3–6. ISBN 978-1-912755-39-4.
51. ^ Walker N (2021). "Neurodiversity: Some Basic Terms & Definitions". Neuroqueer heresies: notes on the neurodiversity paradigm, autistic empowerment, and postnormal possibilities. Fort Worth: Autonomous Press. ISBN 978-1-945955-27-3.
52. Happé F, Frith U (March 2020). "Annual Research Review: Looking back to look forward – changes in the concept of autism and implications for future research". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines. 61 (3): 218–232. doi:10.1111/jcpp.13176. PMID 31994188.
53. ^ Pellicano E, den Houting J (April 2022). "Annual Research Review: Shifting from 'normal science' to neurodiversity in autism science". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines. 63 (4): 381–396. doi:10.1111/jcpp.13534. PMC 9298391. PMID 34730840.
54. Dinishak J (December 2, 2016). "The Deficit View and Its Critics". Disability Studies Quarterly. 36 (4). doi:10.18061/dsq.v36i4.5236.
55. Mottron L (November 2011). "Changing perceptions: The power of autism". Nature. 479 (7371): 33–35. Bibcode:2011Natur.479...33M. doi:10.1038/479033a. PMID 22051659.
56. Ne'eman A (July 2021). "When Disability Is Defined by Behavior, Outcome Measures Should Not Promote 'Passing'". AMA Journal of Ethics. 23 (7): E569–E575. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2021.569. PMC 8957386. PMID 34351268.
57. Ne'Eman A, Richman KA, McCarthy AM, Wilkenfeld D (2023). "A Passing Problem: Evaluating Harm and Benefit in Autism Research". Ethics & Human Research. 45 (6): 2–18. doi:10.1002/eahr.500188. PMID 37988276.
58. Libsack EJ, Keenan EG, Freden CE, Mirmina J, Iskhakov N, Krishnathasan D, et al. (December 2021). "A Systematic Review of Passing as Non-autistic in Autism Spectrum Disorder". Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 24 (4): 783–812. doi:10.1007/s10567-021-00365-1. PMC 10613328. PMID 34505231.
59. Khudiakova V, Russell E, Sowden-Carvalho S, Surtees AD (October 2024). "A systematic review and meta-analysis of mental health outcomes associated with camouflaging in autistic people". Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 118: 102492. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102492.
60. Keating CT, Hickman L, Geelhand P, Takahashi T, Leung J, Monk R, et al. (March 20, 2024). "Cross-cultural variation in experiences of acceptance, camouflaging and mental health difficulties in autism: A registered report". PLOS ONE. 19 (3): e0299824. Bibcode:2024PLoSO..1999824K. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0299824. PMC 10954134. PMID 38507392.
61. Zhuang S, Tan DW, Reddrop S, Dean L, Maybery M, Magiati I (November 2023). "Psychosocial factors associated with camouflaging in autistic people and its relationship with mental health and well-being: A mixed methods systematic review". Clinical Psychology Review. 105: 102335. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102335. PMID 37741059.
62. Klein J, Krahn R, Howe S, Lewis J, McMorris C, Macoun S (October 7, 2024). "A systematic review of social camouflaging in autistic adults and youth: Implications and theory". Development and Psychopathology: 1–15. doi:10.1017/S0954579424001159. PMID 39370528.
63. ^ Schuck RK, Tagavi DM, Baiden KM, Dwyer P, Williams ZJ, Osuna A, et al. (October 2022). "Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 52 (10): 4625–4645. doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05316-x. PMC 9508016. PMID 34643863.
64. ^ McGill O, Robinson A (October 26, 2021). "'Recalling hidden harms': autistic experiences of childhood applied behavioural analysis (ABA)" (PDF). Advances in Autism. 7 (4): 269–282. doi:10.1108/aia-04-2020-0025.
65. Cook J, Hull L, Crane L, Mandy W (November 2021). "Camouflaging in autism: A systematic review". Clinical Psychology Review. 89: 102080. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102080. PMID 34563942.
66. Ai W, Cunningham WA, Lai MC (August 2022). "Reconsidering autistic 'camouflaging' as transactional impression management". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 26 (8): 631–645. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.05.002. PMID 35641372.
67. Ne'eman A (July 2021). "When Disability Is Defined by Behavior, Outcome Measures Should Not Promote 'Passing'". AMA Journal of Ethics. 23 (7): E569–E575. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2021.569. PMC 8957386. PMID 34351268.
68. Collis E, Dark E, Russell A, Brosnan M (August 30, 2024). "Self-Report of Restricted Repetitive Behaviors in Autistic Adults: A Systematic Review". Autism in Adulthood. doi:10.1089/aut.2023.0111.
69. Lung SL, Picard È, Soulières I, Bertone A (September 2024). "Identifying the functions of restricted and repetitive behaviours and interests in Autism: A scoping review". Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 117: 102458. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102458.
70. Waizbard-Bartov E, Ferrer E, Heath B, Andrews DS, Rogers S, Kerns CM, et al. (May 2024). "Changes in the severity of autism symptom domains are related to mental health challenges during middle childhood". Autism. 28 (5): 1216–1230. doi:10.1177/13623613231195108. PMC 10924781. PMID 37691349.
71. McCormack L, Wong SW, Campbell LE (September 2023). "'If I don't Do It, I'm Out of Rhythm and I Can't Focus As Well': Positive and Negative Adult Interpretations of Therapies Aimed at 'Fixing' Their Restricted and Repetitive Behaviours in Childhood". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 53 (9): 3435–3448. doi:10.1007/s10803-022-05644-6. PMC 10465631. PMID 35781855.
72. Anderson LK (April 2023). "Autistic experiences of applied behavior analysis". Autism. 27 (3): 737–750. doi:10.1177/13623613221118216. PMID 35999706.
73. Bury SM, Haschek A, Wenzel M, Spoor JR, Hedley D (November 2024). "Brief Report: Learning About Autism: Is the Source of Autism Knowledge Associated with Differences in Autism Knowledge, Autism Identity, and Experiences of Stigma". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 54 (11): 4346–4353. doi:10.1007/s10803-022-05823-5. PMID 36443495.
74. Botha M, Cage E (2022). "'Autism research is in crisis': A mixed method study of researcher's constructions of autistic people and autism research". Frontiers in Psychology. 13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1050897. PMC 9730396. PMID 36506950.
75. Bottema-Beutel K, Kapp SK, Lester JN, Sasson NJ, Hand BN (March 2021). "Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers". Autism in Adulthood. 3 (1): 18–29. doi:10.1089/aut.2020.0014. PMC 8992888. PMID 36601265.
76. Pearson A, Surtees A, Crompton CJ, Goodall C, Pillai D, Sedgewick F, et al. (2022). "Editorial: Addressing community priorities in autism research". Frontiers in Psychology. 13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1040446. hdl:20.500.11820/1f5ee35e-4a42-4e75-9d77-aa51644d7784. PMC 9552333. PMID 36237673.
77. den Houting J, Pellicano E (November 2019). "A Portfolio Analysis of Autism Research Funding in Australia, 2008–2017". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 49 (11): 4400–4408. doi:10.1007/s10803-019-04155-1. PMID 31375971.
78. Frazier TW, Dawson G, Murray D, Shih A, Sachs JS, Geiger A (November 2018). "Brief Report: A Survey of Autism Research Priorities Across a Diverse Community of Stakeholders". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 48 (11): 3965–3971. doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3642-6. PMID 29948533.
79. Jose C, George-Zwicker P, Tardif L, Bouma A, Pugsley D, Pugsley L, et al. (2020). ""We are the stakeholders with the most at stake": scientific and autism community co-researchers reflect on their collaborative experience in the CONNECT project". Research Involvement and Engagement. 6: 58. doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00233-2. PMC 7520966. PMID 33005439.
80. Ne'eman A, Pellicano E (May 2022). "Neurodiversity as Politics". Human Development. 66 (2): 149–157. doi:10.1159/000524277. PMC 9881465. PMID 36714278.
81. Charlton RA, Entecott T, Belova E, Nwaordu G (2021). "'It feels like holding back something you need to say': Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults accounts of sensory experiences and stimming" (PDF). Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 89: 101864. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101864.
82. Kapp SK, ed. (2020). Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0. hdl:20.500.12657/23177. ISBN 978-981-13-8436-3.
83. Kwok K, Kwok DK (November 2020). "More than comfort and discomfort: Emotion work of parenting children with autism in Hong Kong". Children and Youth Services Review. 118: 105456. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105456.
84. Hull L, Rane S, Lee SH, Sedgewick F (March 22, 2024). "'Just Ask What Support We Need': Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training". Autism in Adulthood. doi:10.1089/aut.2023.0136.
85. Lee EA, Scott M, Black MH, D'Arcy E, Tan T, Sheehy L, et al. (May 2024). "'He Sees his Autism as a Strength, Not a Deficit Now': A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study Investigating the Impact of Strengths-Based Programs on Autistic Adolescents". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 54 (5): 1656–1671. doi:10.1007/s10803-022-05881-9. PMC 9900207. PMID 36745275.
86. ^ Leadbitter K, Buckle KL, Ellis C, Dekker M (2021). "Autistic Self-Advocacy and the Neurodiversity Movement: Implications for Autism Early Intervention Research and Practice". Frontiers in Psychology. 12: 635690. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635690. PMC 8075160. PMID 33912110.
87. Schuck RK, Geng A, Doss Y, Lin F, Crousore H, Baiden KM, et al. (January 2024). "A qualitative investigation into autistic adults' perspectives on intervention goals for autistic children". Neurodiversity. 2. doi:10.1177/27546330241266718.
88. Cullingham T, Rennard U, Creswell C, Milton D, Buckle KL, Godber L, et al. (August 13, 2024). "The process of co-design for a new anxiety intervention for autistic children". JCPP Advances. doi:10.1002/jcv2.12255.
89. Bernhardt JB, Lam GY, Thomas T, Cubells JF, Bohlke K, Reid M, et al. (September 1, 2020). "Meaning in Measurement: Evaluating Young Autistic Adults' Active Engagement and Expressed Interest in Quality-of-Life Goals". Autism in Adulthood. 2 (3): 227–242. doi:10.1089/aut.2019.0081. PMC 8992872. PMID 36601444.
90. Dallman AR, Williams KL, Villa L (April 15, 2022). "Neurodiversity-Affirming Practices are a Moral Imperative for Occupational Therapy". The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy. 10 (2): 1–9. doi:10.15453/2168-6408.1937.
91. Dallman A, Williams K, Boheler J, Boheler G (October 15, 2024). "Moving Toward Neurodiversity-Affirming Occupational Therapy for Autistic People: Key Questions and Next Steps". The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy. 12 (4): 1–7. doi:10.15453/2168-6408.2244.
92. Scheerer NE, Ng CS, Gurba AN, McNair ML, Lerner MD, Hargreaves A (December 4, 2024). "Editorial: Break the stigma: autism". Frontiers in Psychiatry. 15. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1513447. PMC 11653068. PMID 39698208.
93. Gurba AN, McNair ML, Hargreaves A, Scheerer NE, Ng CS, Lerner MD (November 6, 2024). "Editorial: Break the stigma: autism. The future of research on autism stigma - towards multilevel, contextual & global understanding". Frontiers in Psychiatry. 15. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1504429. PMC 11576309. PMID 39568760.
94. Van Den Plas L, Vanaken GJ, Steyaert J, Hens K, Noens I (June 2024). "Towards a neurodiversity-affirmative conceptualisation of psycho-education in the context of autism". Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 114: 102391. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102391.
95. Schuck RK, Fung LK (January 10, 2024). "A dual design thinking – universal design approach to catalyze neurodiversity advocacy through collaboration among high-schoolers". Frontiers in Psychiatry. 14. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1250895. PMC 10806093. PMID 38268559.
96. Cheng Y, Dwyer P, Keating CT (November 2, 2024). "Factors underlying differences in knowledge, explicit stigma and implicit biases towards autism across Hong Kong, the United Kingdom and the United States". Autism. doi:10.1177/13623613241290565. PMID 39487729.
97. Doyle N (October 14, 2020). "Neurodiversity at work: a biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults". British Medical Bulletin. 135 (1): 108–125. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldaa021. PMC 7732033. PMID 32996572.
98. Thompson R (September 3, 2020). "Disability Justice Advocate and Writer Lydia X. Z. Brown on Autism and Neurodivergence". ROOM Magazine. Archived from the original on March 4, 2024. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
99. "Neurodivergence". University of Massachusetts Office of the President. Archived from the original on March 4, 2024. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
100. Coates S (October 25, 2022). "Neurodiversity in the Voice Studio, Clinic, and Performance Space: Using a Neurodiversity Affirming Lens to Build More Inclusive Spaces for Singers. Part 1, Current Understanding of Neurodiversity". Journal of Singing. 79 (2): 213–219. doi:10.53830/VHSX6387. Project MUSE 867856.
101. Chapman R (August 18, 2021). "Negotiating the Neurodiversity Concept". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on March 8, 2024. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
102. Liebowitz C (March 4, 2016). "Here's What Neurodiversity Is – And What It Means For Feminism". Everyday Feminism. Archived from the original on March 4, 2024. Retrieved March 8, 2024.
103. Adams D, Kaliss N, Missner A, Valentine MM (2021). "The Interplay of Nicotine and Social Stress Mediate Dopaminergic Neuron Firing in the Ventral Tegmental Area - Nucleus Accumbens Pathway, Contributing to Stress andDepressive Mood Disorder". Georgetown Scientific Research Journal: 70–83. doi:10.48091/SUVN5250.
104. Homan P, Reddan MC, Brosch T, Koenigsberg HW, Schiller D (November 2017). "Aberrant link between empathy and social attribution style in borderline personality disorder". Journal of Psychiatric Research. 94: 163–171. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.07.012. PMID 28735169.
105. Corsi E, Cardi V, Sowden S, Coll MP, Cascino G, Ricca V, et al. (August 2021). "Socio-cognitive processing in people with eating disorders: Computerized tests of mentalizing, empathy and imitation skills". The International Journal of Eating Disorders. 54 (8): 1509–1518. doi:10.1002/eat.23556. PMC 8453969. PMID 34056730.
106. Simpson E, Dalal S, Semaan B (April 14, 2023). "'Hey, Can You Add Captions?': The Critical Infrastructuring Practices of Neurodiverse People on TikTok". Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 7 (CSCW1): 1–27. arXiv:2212.06204. doi:10.1145/3579490.
107. "Is it OK to use the term 'neurospicy' when talking about autism and other neurodivergences?". medicalxpress.com. November 15, 2024. Retrieved November 20, 2024.
108. "Neurospicy Meaning & Origin". womenshealthpodcast.com. April 11, 2024. Retrieved November 20, 2024.
109. "Advice | He's been diagnosed with autism. Is it too late to keep his job?". Washington Post. Archived from the original on March 14, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2023.
110. "Neurotypical". Cambridge English Dictionary. Archived from the original on February 21, 2023. Retrieved May 23, 2022.
111. Walker N (2021). Neuroqueer Heresies. Autonomous Press. p. 40. ISBN 978-1-945955-26-6.
112. Hare DJ, Jones S, Evershed K (November 2006). "A comparative study of circadian rhythm functioning and sleep in people with Asperger syndrome". Autism. 10 (6): 565–575. doi:10.1177/1362361306068509. PMID 17088273.
113. O'Connor K, Hamm JP, Kirk IJ (October 2005). "The neurophysiological correlates of face processing in adults and children with Asperger's syndrome". Brain and Cognition. 59 (1): 82–95. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2005.05.004. PMID 16009478.
114. Legault M, Bourdon JN, Poirier P (December 2021). "From neurodiversity to neurodivergence: the role of epistemic and cognitive marginalization". Synthese. 199 (5–6): 12843–12868. doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03356-5.
115. Timberlake H (October 10, 2019). "Why there is no such thing as a 'normal' brain". BBC.
116. Costandi M (October 7, 2011). "Memory errors are all in the groove". The Guardian.
117. "Language and abbreviations". June 6, 2008. Archived from the original on June 6, 2008. Retrieved April 19, 2022.
118. Arnold L (October 7, 2017). "A brief history of "Neurodiversity" as a concept and perhaps a movement". Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies. 1 (5). Archived from the original on December 1, 2022. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
119. Tisoncik LA (2020). "Autistics.Org and Finding Our Voices as an Activist Movement". In Kapp SK (ed.). Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement. Singapore: Springer. pp. 65–76. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0_5. ISBN 978-981-13-8437-0.
120. Blume H (September 30, 1998). "Neurodiversity". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on January 5, 2013. Retrieved April 19, 2022.
121. Walker N (2021). Neuroqueer heresies: notes on the neurodiversity paradigm, autistic empowerment, and postnormal possibilities. Autonomous Press. pp. 33–46. ISBN 978-1-945955-26-6. OCLC 1287945422. Archived from the original on December 30, 2022. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
122. McNaughton R, Pieper C, Sakai O, Rollins JV, Zhang X, Kennedy DN, et al. (August 2022). "Quantitative MRI Characterization of the Extremely Preterm Brain at Adolescence: Atypical versus Neurotypical Developmental Pathways". Radiology. 304 (2): 419–428. doi:10.1148/radiol.210385. PMC 9340244. PMID 35471112.
123. "Allistic". Cambridge English Dictionary. Archived from the original on November 30, 2022. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
124. "How to talk about autism". www.autism.org.uk. Archived from the original on March 7, 2022. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
125. Crompton CJ, DeBrabander K, Heasman B, Milton D, Sasson NJ (May 11, 2021). "Double Empathy: Why Autistic People Are Often Misunderstood". Frontiers for Young Minds. 9: 554875. doi:10.3389/frym.2021.554875. hdl:20.500.11820/94ee032a-6103-470a-bc06-08337dd6b512.
126. DeThorne LS (April 2020). "Revealing the Double Empathy Problem: It's not that autistic* people lack empathy. Rather, their different neurotypes and experiences may make it harder for nonautisic people to understand them—and vice versa". The ASHA Leader. 25 (3): 58–65. doi:10.1044/leader.FTR2.25042020.58.
127. Milton DE (October 2012). "On the ontological status of autism: the 'double empathy problem'" (PDF). Disability & Society. 27 (6): 883–887. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.710008.
128. Rifai OM, Fletcher-Watson S, Jiménez-Sánchez L, Crompton CJ (March 2022). "Investigating Markers of Rapport in Autistic and Nonautistic Interactions". Autism in Adulthood. 4 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1089/aut.2021.0017. PMC 8992924. PMID 36600904.
129. Schuck RK, Fung LK (2024). "A dual design thinking – universal design approach to catalyze neurodiversity advocacy through collaboration among high-schoolers". Frontiers in Psychiatry. 14. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1250895. PMC 10806093. PMID 38268559.
130. "The double empathy problem". www.autism.org.uk. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved June 3, 2023.
131. Jaswal VK, Akhtar N (June 2018). "Being versus appearing socially uninterested: Challenging assumptions about social motivation in autism". The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 42: e82. doi:10.1017/s0140525x18001826. PMID 29914590.
132. Jaarsma P, Welin S (March 2012). "Autism as a natural human variation: reflections on the claims of the neurodiversity movement". Health Care Analysis. 20 (1): 20–30. doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9. PMID 21311979.
133. Woodford G (2006). "'We Don't Need to be Cured' Autistics Say". National Review of Medicine. 3 (8). Archived from the original on March 3, 2016.
134. Arnold L (2020). "Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies". In Kapp SK (ed.). Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement: Stories from the Frontline. Singapore: Springer. pp. 211–220. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0_15. ISBN 978-981-13-8437-0.
135. Mackenzie R, Watts J (January 31, 2011). "Is our legal, health care and social support infrastructure neurodiverse enough? How far are the aims of the neurodiversity movement fulfilled for those diagnosed with cognitive disability and learning disability?". Tizard Learning Disability Review. 16 (1): 30–37. doi:10.5042/tldr.2011.0005. We recommend, therefore, that the term neurodiverse include the conditions ASD, ADHD, OCD, language disorders, developmental coordination disorder, dyslexia and Tourette's syndrome.
136. Morrice P (January 29, 2006). "Otherwise Minded". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 21, 2015. Retrieved February 11, 2017. review of A Mind Apart: Travels in a Neurodiverse World
137. Antonetta S (2005). A mind apart: travels in a neurodiverse world. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin. ISBN 1-58542-382-3. OCLC 60671914.
138. Anton AL (2014). "The Virtue of Sociopaths: how to appreciate the neurodiversity of sociopathy without becoming a victim". In Perry A, Yankowski A (eds.). Ethics and Neurodiversity. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 111–130. ISBN 978-1-4438-6759-7.
139. "Position Statements". Autistic Self Advocacy Network. May 28, 2011. Archived from the original on July 17, 2012. Retrieved April 21, 2013.
140. Leadbitter K, Buckle KL, Ellis C, Dekker M (April 12, 2021). "Autistic Self-Advocacy and the Neurodiversity Movement: Implications for Autism Early Intervention Research and Practice". Frontiers in Psychology. 12: 635690. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635690. PMC 8075160. PMID 33912110.
141. "What We Believe - Autistic Self Advocacy Network". 2021. Archived from the original on February 12, 2022. Retrieved September 30, 2023.
142. "What is Neurodiversity?". National Symposium on Neurodiversity at Syracuse University. 2011. Archived from the original on April 16, 2019. Retrieved October 2, 2012.
143. Subramanyam AA, Mukherjee A, Dave M, Chavda K (January 2019). "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Autism Spectrum Disorders". Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 61 (Suppl 2): 254–269. doi:10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_542_18. PMC 6345133. PMID 30745701.
144. Lupton E, Kafei F, Tobias J, Halstead JA, Sales K, Xia L, et al. (2021). Extra bold: a feminist inclusive anti-racist nonbinary field guide for graphic designers (First ed.). Hudson, NY: Princeton Architectural Press. ISBN 978-1-61689-918-9.
145. ^ Griffin E, Pollak D (February 2009). "Student experiences of neurodiversity in higher education: insights from the BRAINHE project". Dyslexia. 15 (1): 23–41. doi:10.1002/dys.383. PMID 19140120.
146. Kapp SK, Gillespie-Lynch K, Sherman LE, Hutman T (January 2013). "Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity". Developmental Psychology. 49 (1): 59–71. doi:10.1037/a0028353. PMID 22545843.
147. "What Is Neurodiversity?". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on May 13, 2024. Retrieved September 17, 2020.
148. ^ Kwon Ck, Guadalupe SS, Archer M, Groomes DA (August 2023). "Understanding career development pathways of college students with disabilities using crip theory and the theory of whole self". Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 16 (4): 520–525. doi:10.1037/dhe0000464.
149. Hamilton LG, Petty S (February 16, 2023). "Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: A conceptual analysis". Frontiers in Psychology. 14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093290. PMC 9978378. PMID 36874864.
150. Nachman BR, Brown KR (August 2024). "Crip places: Dismantling disability discourse in the 2-year college literature". Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 17 (4): 634–647. doi:10.1037/dhe0000443.
151. ^ Whelpley CE, May CP (April 2023). "Seeing is Disliking: Evidence of Bias Against Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Traditional Job Interviews". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 53 (4): 1363–1374. doi:10.1007/s10803-022-05432-2. PMID 35294714.
152. Willis C, Powell-Rudy T, Colley K, Prasad J (November 2021). "Examining the Use of Game-Based Assessments for Hiring Autistic Job Seekers". Journal of Intelligence. 9 (4): 53. doi:10.3390/jintelligence9040053. PMC 8628896. PMID 34842751.
153. "Specialisterne & SAP: A partnership for access to markets, multiple countries/ Denmark". Boosting Social Enterprise Development. Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED). 2017. pp. 215–223. doi:10.1787/9789264268500-22-en. ISBN 978-92-64-26849-4.
154. Moran G (December 7, 2019). "Companies Like Microsoft and Goldman Sachs Are Hiring More Neurodiverse Talent". Fortune. Retrieved July 7, 2024.
155. "Neurodiversity inclusion projects". Specialisterne Brasil. Retrieved July 7, 2024.
156. de Beer J, Heerkens Y, Engels J, van der Klink J (May 2022). "Factors relevant to work participation from the perspective of adults with developmental dyslexia: a systematic review of qualitative studies". BMC Public Health. 22 (1): 1083. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13436-x. PMC 9158268. PMID 35642026.
157. Lauder K, McDowall A, Tenenbaum HR (2022). "A systematic review of interventions to support adults with ADHD at work – Implications from the paucity of context-specific research for theory and practice". Frontiers in Psychology. 13: 893469. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893469. PMC 9443814. PMID 36072032.
158. Goldfarb Y, Gal E, Golan O (January 2022). "Implications of Employment Changes Caused by COVID-19 on Mental Health and Work-Related Psychological Need Satisfaction of Autistic Employees: A Mixed-Methods Longitudinal Study". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 52 (1): 89–102. doi:10.1007/s10803-021-04902-3. PMC 7908957. PMID 33635422.
159. Tomczak MT, Mpofu E, Hutson N (September 2022). "Remote Work Support Needs of Employees with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Poland: Perspectives of Individuals with Autism and Their Coworkers". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (17): 10982. doi:10.3390/ijerph191710982. PMC 9518488. PMID 36078696.
160. ^ Wang T, Garfield M, Wisniewski P, Page X (October 17, 2020). "Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing". Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 419–424. doi:10.1145/3406865.3418322. ISBN 978-1-4503-8059-1.
161. ^ Gabarron E, Dechsling A, Skafle I, Nordahl-Hansen A (March 2022). "Discussions of Asperger Syndrome on Social Media: Content and Sentiment Analysis on Twitter". JMIR Formative Research. 6 (3): e32752. doi:10.2196/32752. PMC 8938830. PMID 35254265.
162. ^ Brownlow C, Bertilsdotter Rosqvist H, O'Dell L (November 2, 2015). "Exploring the potential for social networking among people with autism: challenging dominant ideas of 'friendship'". Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. 17 (2): 188–193. doi:10.1080/15017419.2013.859174.
163. "Blossom: An App for the Neurodiverse Community". The Lakshmi Mittal and Family South Asia Institute. January 26, 2022. Archived from the original on May 29, 2022. Retrieved April 11, 2022.
164. ^ Calhoun AJ, Gold JA (April 2020). "'I Feel Like I Know Them': the Positive Effect of Celebrity Self-disclosure of Mental Illness". Academic Psychiatry. 44 (2): 237–241. doi:10.1007/s40596-020-01200-5. PMID 32100256.
165. Stuart H (February 1, 2006). "Media portrayal of mental illness and its treatments: what effect does it have on people with mental illness?". CNS Drugs. 20 (2): 99–106. doi:10.2165/00023210-200620020-00002. PMID 16478286.
166. ^ Bitman N (February 2022). "'Authentic' digital inclusion? Dis/ability performances on social media by users with concealable communicative disabilities". New Media & Society. 24 (2): 401–419. doi:10.1177/14614448211063183.
167. Salisbury M, Pooley J (January 20, 2017). "The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016". Social Sciences. 6 (1): 10. doi:10.3390/socsci6010010.
168. ^ Duong D, Vogel L (July 2022). "Untapped potential: embracing neurodiversity in medicine". CMAJ. 194 (27): E951–E952. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1096006. PMC 9299741. PMID 35851534.
169. ^ Im DS, Tamarelli CM (2023). "Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Medical Learners and Physicians and a Potentially Helpful Educational Tool". Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 14: 435–442. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S398196. PMC 10149068. PMID 37131931.
170. ^ "Embracing Neurodiversity in Our Health Systems". www.aap.org. Retrieved October 26, 2023.
171. "Stanford Neurodiversity Project". Stanford Neurodiversity Project (in Samoan). Retrieved October 26, 2023.
172. ^ Dunn ZD, Gowda A, Horsfall Turner IC (January 2024). "The viability of a proposed psychoeducational neurodiversity approach in children services: The PANDA (the Portsmouth alliance's neuro-diversity approach)". Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 29 (1): 198–212. doi:10.1177/13591045231184121. PMID 37311174.
173. ^ Chapman R, Botha M (March 2023). "Neurodivergence-informed therapy". Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 65 (3): 310–317. doi:10.1111/dmcn.15384. PMID 36082483.
174. ^ Healey G (2023). "What is neurodiversity affirming therapy?". Lawson Clinical Psychology. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved October 22, 2023.
175. ^ McDonald TA, Lalani S, Chen I, Cotton CM, MacDonald L, Boursoulian LJ, et al. (August 2023). "Appropriateness, Acceptability, and Feasibility of a Neurodiversity-Based Self-determination Program for Autistic Adults". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 53 (8): 2933–2953. doi:10.1007/s10803-022-05598-9. PMC 9934918. PMID 35618972.
176. ^ Manning C, Scerif G (August 2023). "Understanding perceptual decisions by studying development and neurodiversity". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 32 (4): 300–306. doi:10.1177/09637214231162369. PMC 7614885. PMID 37547284.
177. ^ Leaf JB, Cihon JH, Leaf R, McEachin J, Liu N, Russell N, et al. (June 2022). "Concerns About ABA-Based Intervention: An Evaluation and Recommendations". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 52 (6): 2838–2853. doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05137-y. PMC 9114057. PMID 34132968.
178. Dwyer P (2022). "The Neurodiversity Approach(es): What Are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers?". Human Development. 66 (2): 73–92. doi:10.1159/000523723. PMC 9261839. PMID 36158596.
179. Swenson K (January 31, 2020). "Phrenology as neurodiversity". Progress and Pathology. Manchester University Press. doi:10.7765/9781526147547.00011. ISBN 978-1-5261-4754-7. Though not a 'new phrenology', the neurodiversity movement shares certain features with the Fowlers' practical phrenology, both in theory and methods. Neurodiversity activists pursue alternatives to the 'pathology paradigm' surrounding the rise in neurological disorder diagnoses, and argue that neurodiversity is both a 'natural and a valuable form of human diversity'.
180. ^ Russell G (2020). "Critiques of the Neurodiversity Movement". Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement. pp. 287–303. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0_21. ISBN 978-981-13-8436-3.
181. Walker N (2021). "Defining Neurotypicality & Neurodivergence". Neuroqueer heresies: notes on the neurodiversity paradigm, autistic empowerment, and postnormal possibilities. Fort Worth: Autonomous Press. ISBN 978-1-945955-27-3.

Further reading

• Armstrong T (2010). Neurodiversity: Discovering the Extraordinary Gifts of Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia, and Other Brain Differences. Boston: Da Capo Lifelong. p. 288. ISBN 978-0-7382-1354-5.
• Armstrong T (2011). The power of neurodiversity: unleashing the advantages of your differently wired brain (1st Da Capo Press paperback ed.). Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Lifelong. ISBN 978-0-7382-1524-2. OCLC 760085215.
• Armstrong T (2012). Neurodiversity in the Classroom: Strength-Based Strategies to Help Students with Special Needs Succeed in School and Life. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. p. 188. ISBN 978-1-4166-1483-8.
• Dinh A (2024). Don't Mourn for Us: The Autistic Life of Jim Sinclair and an Extraordinary Story of Neurodiversity. Independently published. ISBN 979-8338157381.
• McNamara B (December 12, 2016). "The Kaleidoscope Society Is Smashing ADHD Stigma for Women and Girls". Teen Vogue. Archived from the original on September 28, 2020. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
• Nerenberg J (May 19, 2017). "What Neurodiversity Is And Why Companies Should Embrace It". Fast Company. Archived from the original on October 1, 2020. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
• Reitman H (2015). Aspertools: The Practical Guide for Understanding and Embracing Asperger's, Autism Spectrum Disorders, and Neurodiversity. Deerfield Beach, FL: HCI Books. p. 240. ISBN 978-0-7573-1854-2.
• Silberman S (April 16, 2013). "Neurodiversity Rewires Conventional Thinking About Brains". Wired. Archived from the original on May 3, 2013. Retrieved May 7, 2013.
• Praslova LN (December 13, 2021). "Autism Doesn't Hold People Back at Work. Discrimination Does". Harvard Business Review. Archived from the original on August 5, 2022. Retrieved August 5, 2022.
• Praslova LN (December 15, 2021). "Neurodivergent people make great leaders, not just employees". Fast Company. Archived from the original on August 5, 2022. Retrieved August 5, 2022.
• Praslova LN (June 21, 2022). "An Intersectional Approach to Inclusion at Work". Harvard Business Review. Archived from the original on August 5, 2022. Retrieved August 5, 2022.
• Smith T, Kirby A (2021). Neurodiversity at Work: Drive Innovation, Performance and Productivity with a Neurodiverse Workforce. London: Kogan Page Limited. ISBN 978-1-3986-0024-9.

External links

• Media related to Neurodiversity at Wikimedia Commons
• The dictionary definition of neurodiversity at Wiktionary
• Learning materials related to The Neurodiversity Movement at Wikiversity

• Neurodiversity
• Disability pride
• Mental health
• Disability rights
• Sociological terminology
• 1998 neologisms