Misplaced Pages

Normalized solution (mathematics)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
The probability density distribution of a quantum particle in three-dimensional space. The points in the image represent the probability of finding the particle at those locations, with darker colors indicating higher probabilities. To simplify and clarify the visualization, low-probability regions have been filtered out. In fact, the total probability 1 means that the particle exists everywhere in the entire space.
Part of a series of articles about
Quantum mechanics
i d d t | Ψ = H ^ | Ψ {\displaystyle i\hbar {\frac {d}{dt}}|\Psi \rangle ={\hat {H}}|\Psi \rangle } Schrödinger equation
Background
Fundamentals
Experiments
Formulations
Equations
Interpretations
Advanced topics
Scientists

In mathematics, a normalized solution to an ordinary or partial differential equation is a solution with prescribed norm, that is, a solution which satisfies a condition like R N | u ( x ) | 2 d x = 1. {\displaystyle \int _{\mathbb {R} ^{N}}|u(x)|^{2}\,dx=1.} In this article, the normalized solution is introduced by using the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. The nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) is a fundamental equation in quantum mechanics and other various fields of physics, describing the evolution of complex wave functions. In Quantum Physics, normalization means that the total probability of finding a quantum particle anywhere in the universe is unity.

Definition and variational framework

In order to illustrate this concept, consider the following nonlinear Schrödinger equation with prescribed norm:

Δ u + λ u = f ( u ) , R N | u | 2 d x = 1 , {\displaystyle -\Delta u+\lambda u=f(u),\quad \int _{\mathbb {R} ^{N}}|u|^{2}\,dx=1,}

where Δ {\displaystyle \Delta } is a Laplacian operator, N 1 , λ R {\displaystyle N\geq 1,\lambda \in \mathbb {R} } is a Lagrange multiplier and f {\displaystyle f} is a nonlinearity. If we want to find a normalized solution to the equation, we need to consider the following functional: Let I : H 0 1 ( R N ) R {\displaystyle I:H_{0}^{1}(\mathbb {R} ^{N})\rightarrow \mathbb {R} } be defined by

I ( u ) = 1 2 R N | u | 2 d x R N F ( u ) d x {\displaystyle I(u)={\frac {1}{2}}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{N}}|\nabla u|^{2}dx-\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{N}}F(u)dx}

with the constraint

M = { u H 0 1 ( R N ) : R N u 2 = 1 } ,         {\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}=\{u\in H_{0}^{1}(\mathbb {R} ^{N}):\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{N}}u^{2}=1\},\ \ \ \ }

where H 0 1 ( R N ) {\displaystyle H_{0}^{1}(\mathbb {R} ^{N})} is the Hilbert space and F ( s ) {\displaystyle F(s)} is the primitive of f ( s ) {\displaystyle f(s)} .

A common method of finding normalized solutions is through variational methods, i.e., finding the maxima and minima of the corresponding functional with the prescribed norm. Thus, we can find the weak solution of the equation. Moreover, if it satisfies the constraint, it's a normalized solution.

A simple example on Euclidean space

An example of the constrained problem

On a Euclidean space R 3 {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}} , we define a function f : R 2 R : {\displaystyle f:\mathbb {R} ^{2}\rightarrow \mathbb {R} :}

f ( x , y ) = ( x + y ) 2 {\displaystyle f(x,y)=(x+y)^{2}} with the constraint x 2 + y 2 = 1 {\displaystyle x^{2}+y^{2}=1} .

By direct calculation, it is not difficult to conclude that the constrained maximum is f = 2 {\displaystyle f=2} , with solutions ( x , y ) = ( 2 2 , 2 2 ) {\displaystyle (x,y)=({\frac {\sqrt {2}}{2}},{\frac {\sqrt {2}}{2}})} and ( x , y ) = ( 2 2 , 2 2 ) {\displaystyle (x,y)=({\frac {-{\sqrt {2}}}{2}},{\frac {-{\sqrt {2}}}{2}})} , while the constrained minimum is f = 0 {\displaystyle f=0} , with solutions ( x , y ) = ( 2 2 , 2 2 ) {\displaystyle (x,y)=({\frac {-{\sqrt {2}}}{2}},{\frac {\sqrt {2}}{2}})} and ( x , y ) = ( 2 2 , 2 2 ) {\displaystyle (x,y)=({\frac {\sqrt {2}}{2}},{\frac {-{\sqrt {2}}}{2}})} .

History

The exploration of normalized solutions for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation can be traced back to the study of standing wave solutions with prescribed L 2 {\displaystyle L^{2}} -norm. Jürgen Moser firstly introduced the concept of normalized solutions in the study of regularity properties of solutions to elliptic partial differential equations (elliptic PDEs). Specifically, he used normalized sequences of functions to prove regularity results for solutions of elliptic equations, which was a significant contribution to the field. Inequalities developed by Emilio Gagliardo and Louis Nirenberg played a crucial role in the study of PDE solutions in L p {\displaystyle L^{p}} spaces. These inequalities provided important tools and background for defining and understanding normalized solutions.

For the variational problem, early foundational work in this area includes the concentration-compactness principle introduced by Pierre-Louis Lions in 1984, which provided essential techniques for solving these problems.

For variational problems with prescribed mass, several methods commonly used to deal with unconstrained variational problems are no longer available. At the same time, a new critical exponent appeared, the L 2 {\displaystyle L^{2}} -critical exponent. From the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, we can find that the nonlinearity satisfying L 2 {\displaystyle L^{2}} -subcritical or critical or supercritical leads to a different geometry for functional. In the case the functional is bounded below, i.e., L 2 {\displaystyle L^{2}} subcritical case, the earliest result on this problem was obtained by Charles-Alexander Stuart using bifurcation methods to demonstrate the existence of solutions. Later, Thierry Cazenave and Pierre-Louis Lions obtained existence results using minimization methods. Then, Masataka Shibata considered Schrödinger equations with a general nonlinear term.

In the case the functional is not bounded below, i.e., L 2 {\displaystyle L^{2}} supcritical case, some new difficulties arise. Firstly, since λ {\displaystyle \lambda } is unknown, it is impossible to construct the corresponding Nehari manifold. Secondly, it is not easy to obtain the boundedness of the Palais-Smale sequence. Furthermore, verifying the compactness of the Palais-Smale sequence is challenging because the embedding H 1 ( R N ) L 2 ( R N ) {\displaystyle H^{1}(\mathbb {R} ^{N})\hookrightarrow L^{2}(\mathbb {R} ^{N})} is not compact. In 1997, Louis Jeanjean using the following transform:

( s u ) ( x ) := e N s 2 u ( e s x ) . {\displaystyle (s\star u)(x):=e^{\frac {Ns}{2}}u(e^{s}x).}

Thus, one has the following functional:

I ~ ( u , s ) := I ( s u ) = e 2 s R N | u ( x ) | 2 d x 1 e s N R N F ( e N s 2 u ( x ) ) d x . {\displaystyle {\tilde {I}}(u,s):=I(s\star u)=e^{2s}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{N}}|\nabla u(x)|^{2}dx-{\frac {1}{e^{sN}}}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{N}}F(e^{\frac {Ns}{2}}u(x))dx.}

Then,

P ( u ) := s I ~ ( u , s ) | s = 0 = R N | u | 2 N R N ( 1 2 f ( u ) u F ( u ) ) {\displaystyle P(u):=\partial _{s}{\tilde {I}}(u,s)|_{s=0}=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{N}}|\nabla u|^{2}-N\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{N}}\left({\frac {1}{2}}f(u)u-F(u)\right)}

which corresponds exactly to the Pokhozhaev's identity of equation. Jeanjean used this additional condition to ensure the boundedness of the Palais-Smale sequence, thereby overcoming the difficulties mentioned earlier. As the first method to address the issue of normalized solutions in unbounded functional, Jeanjean's approach has become a common method for handling such problems and has been imitated and developed by subsequent researchers.

In the following decades, researchers expanded on these foundational results. Thomas Bartsch and Sébastien de Valeriola investigate the existence of multiple normalized solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations. The authors focus on finding solutions that satisfy a prescribed L 2 {\displaystyle L^{2}} norm constraint. Recent advancements include the study of normalized ground states for NLS equations with combined nonlinearities by Nicola Soave in 2020, who examined both subcritical and critical cases. This research highlighted the intricate balance between different types of nonlinearities and their impact on the existence and multiplicity of solutions.

In bounded domain, the situation is very different. Let's define f ( s ) = | s | p 2 s {\displaystyle f(s)=|s|^{p-2}s} where p ( 2 , 2 ) {\displaystyle p\in (2,2^{*})} . Refer to Pokhozhaev's identity,

2 N 2 Ω | u | 2 d x λ N 2 Ω u 2 d x + N p Ω | u | p d x 1 2 Ω | u ν | 2 x ν d σ = 0. {\displaystyle {\frac {2-N}{2}}\int _{\Omega }|\nabla u|^{2}\,dx-{\frac {\lambda N}{2}}\int _{\Omega }u^{2}\,dx+{\frac {N}{p}}\int _{\Omega }|u|^{p}\,dx-{\frac {1}{2}}\int _{\partial \Omega }|{\frac {\partial u}{\partial \nu }}|^{2}x\cdot \nu \,d\sigma =0.}

The boundary term will make it impossible to apply Jeanjean's method. This has led many scholars to explore the problem of normalized solutions on bounded domains in recent years. In addition, there have been a number of interesting results in recent years about normalized solutions in Schrödinger system, Choquard equation, or Dirac equation.

Some extended concepts

Mass critical, mass subcritical, mass supcritical

Let's consider the nonlinear term to be homogeneous, that is, let's define f ( s ) = | s | p 2 s {\displaystyle f(s)=|s|^{p-2}s} where p ( 2 , 2 ) {\displaystyle p\in (2,2^{*})} . Refer to Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality: define

γ p := N ( p 2 ) 2 p , {\displaystyle \gamma _{p}:={\frac {N(p-2)}{2p}},}

then there exists a constant C N , p {\displaystyle C_{N,p}} such that for any u H 1 ( R N ) {\displaystyle u\in H^{1}(\mathbb {R} ^{N})} , the following inequality holds:

| u | p C N , p | u | 2 γ p | u | 2 1 γ p . {\displaystyle |u|_{p}\leq C_{N,p}|\nabla u|_{2}^{\gamma _{p}}|u|_{2}^{1-\gamma _{p}}.}

Thus, there's a concept of mass critical exponent,

p := 2 + 4 N . {\displaystyle p:=2+{\frac {4}{N}}.}

From this, we can get different concepts about mass subcritical as well as mass supercritical. It is also useful to get whether the functional is bounded below or not.

Palais-Smale sequence

Let X {\displaystyle X} be a Banach space and I : X R {\displaystyle I:X\to \mathbb {R} } be a functional. A sequence ( u n ) n X {\displaystyle (u_{n})_{n}\subset X} is called a Palais-Smale sequence for I {\displaystyle I} at the level c R {\displaystyle c\in \mathbb {R} } if it satisfies the following conditions:

1. Energy Bound: sup n I ( u n ) < {\displaystyle \sup _{n}I(u_{n})<\infty } .

2. Gradient Condition: I ( u n ) , u n u 0 {\displaystyle \langle I'(u_{n}),u_{n}-u\rangle \to 0} as n {\displaystyle n\to \infty } for some u X {\displaystyle u\in X} .

Here, I {\displaystyle I'} denotes the Fréchet derivative of I {\displaystyle I} , and , {\displaystyle \langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle } denotes the inner product in X {\displaystyle X} . Palais-Smale sequence named after Richard Palais and Stephen Smale.

See also

References

  1. Berestycki, H.; Lions, P.-L. (1983). "Nonlinear scalar field equations. I. Existence of a ground state". Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 82 (4): 313–345. doi:10.1007/BF00250555. MR 0695535.
  2. ^ Jeanjean, L. (1997). "Existence of solutions with prescribed norm for semilinear elliptic equations". Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications. 28 (10): 1633–1659. doi:10.1016/S0362-546X(96)00021-1. MR 1430506.
  3. Lieb, E.H.; Loss, M. (2001). Analysis. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 14. American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0821827833.
  4. Moser, J. (1960). "A new proof of de Giorgi's theorem concerning the regularity problem for elliptic differential equations". Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. 13 (3): 457–468. doi:10.1002/cpa.3160130308. MR 0170091.
  5. Gagliardo, E. (1959). "Ulteriori proprietà di alcune classi di funzioni in più variabili". Ricerche di Matematica. 8: 24–51. MR 0109295.
  6. Nirenberg, L. (1959). "On elliptic partial differential equations". Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Serie 3. 13: 115–162. MR 0109940.
  7. Lions, P.-L. (1984). "The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, part 1". Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré C. 1 (2): 109–145. doi:10.1016/s0294-1449(16)30428-0. MR 0778970.
  8. Stuart, C.A. (1980). "Bifurcation for variational problems when the linearization has no eigenvalues". Journal of Functional Analysis. 38 (2): 169–187. doi:10.1016/0022-1236(80)90063-4. MR 0587907.
  9. Stuart, C.A. (1981). "Bifurcation from the continuous spectrum in L {\displaystyle L^{*}} -theory of elliptic equations on R N {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{N}} ". Recent Methods in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications. Liguori, Napoli. MR 0819032.
  10. Stuart, C.A. (1989). "Bifurcation from the essential spectrum for some non-compact nonlinearities". Mathematical Applications and Sciences. 11: 525–542. MR 1001101.
  11. Cazenave, T.; Lions, P.L. (1982). "Orbital stability of standing waves for some nonlinear Schrödinger equations". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 85 (4): 549–561. doi:10.1007/BF01403504. MR 0677997.
  12. Shibata, M. (2014). "Stable standing waves of nonlinear Schrödinger equations with a general nonlinear term". Manuscripta Mathematica. 143 (1–2): 221–237. doi:10.1007/s00229-013-0627-9. MR 3147450.
  13. Bartsch, T.; de Valeriola, S. (2013). "Normalized solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations". Archiv der Mathematik (Basel). 100: 75–83. doi:10.1007/s00013-012-0468-x. MR 3009665.
  14. Soave, N. (2020). "Normalized ground states for the NLS equation with combined nonlinearities". Journal of Differential Equations. 269 (9): 6941–6987. arXiv:1904.03174. doi:10.1016/j.jde.2020.05.012. MR 4107073.
  15. Soave, N. (2020). "Normalized ground states for the NLS equation with combined nonlinearities: the Sobolev critical case". Journal of Functional Analysis. 279 (6): 108610. arXiv:1901.02003. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108610. MR 4096725.
  16. Noris, Benedetta; Tavares, Hugo; Verzini, Gianmaria (2014). "Existence and orbital stability of the ground states with prescribed mass for the L2-critical and supercritical NLS on bounded domains". Anal. PDE. 7 (8): 1807–1838. arXiv:1307.3981. doi:10.2140/apde.2014.7.1807. MR 3318740.
  17. Bartsch, Thomas; Jeanjean, Louis; Soave, Nicola (2016). "Normalized solutions for a system of coupled cubic Schrödinger equations on R3". J. Math. Pures Appl. (9). 106 (4): 583–614. doi:10.1016/j.matpur.2016.03.004. hdl:11311/1007043. MR 3539467.
  18. Bartsch, Thomas; Liu, Yanyan; Liu, Zhaoli (2020). "Normalized solutions for a class of nonlinear Choquard equations". Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. 1 (5): Paper No. 34, 25 pp. doi:10.1007/s42985-020-00036-w. MR 4309842.
  19. Nolasco, Margherita (2021). "A normalized solitary wave solution of the Maxwell-Dirac equations". Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire. 38 (6): 1681–1702. arXiv:2010.14310. doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2020.12.006. MR 4327893.
  20. Palais, R. S.; Smale, S. (1964). "A generalized Morse theory". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 70: 165–172. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1964-11062-4. MR 0158411.

Further reading

Quantum mechanics
Background
Fundamentals
Formulations
Equations
Interpretations
Experiments
Science
Technology
Extensions
Related
Quantum field theories
Theories
Models
Regular
Low dimensional
Conformal
Supersymmetric
Superconformal
Supergravity
Topological
Particle theory
Related
See also: Template:Quantum mechanics topics
Categories: