Old Telugu | |
---|---|
Era | c.200 BCE - 1000 CE |
Language family | Dravidian
|
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | None (mis ) |
Glottolog | oldt1249 |
Old Telugu (Telugu: ప్రాఁదెనుఁగు, ప్ఴాన్దెనుఙ్గు, పాత తెలుగు, romanized: prā̃denũgu, pḻāndenuṅgu, pāta telugu) is the earliest attested stage of the Telugu language.
Old Telugu is attested in various inscriptions, labels and as early loanwords in the literature of several other languages.
Etymology
The term పాత తెలుగు pāta telugu is the Modern Telugu word, referring to the Old Telugu language.
The word పాత pāta and the adjectival prefixes ప్రాఁ prā̃, ప్ఴాన్ pḻān come from the reconstructed Dravidian word *paḻan-(tta), meaning old/ancient.
History
Features
Phonology
In Old Telugu, the inherited Proto-Dravidian consonantal system was fairly well preserved except for incorporating the feature of voicing from the earliest known period.
Old Telugu maintained a three-way distinction of coronal consonants which includes, alveolar, retroflex and dental stops. ḏ was originally derived from PDr post-nasal *-ṯ- and constrasted with intervocalic trill -ṟ-. In very few cases -ḏ- did appear intervocalically, eg. caḏu (> ceḍu) vs pāṟum but it was mostly an allophone of ṟ before n, eg. mūnḏu.
Voiceless stops appeared at medial positions, by the simplification of geminates after a long vowel and a nasal, eg: *tōṇṭṭa > tōṇṭa (> tōṭa) :'garden'.
Pre-plosive nasals are allophones in both Old and Modern Telugu; i.e: n before dentals, ṇ before retroflexes, ṉ before alveolars, ṅ before velars, ñ before palatals and m before labials.
Aspirated consonants were borrowed from Indo-Aryan and were incorporated into the writing system, although colloquially the contrast of aspirated-unaspirated stops largely remained absent in most dialects and accents, even in Modern Telugu.
Apical displacement was progressive for certain period of time, resulting in word-initial apical consonants in some words. This change was initiated in pre-historic times and is recorded historically.
eg: *awanḏu > wānḏu ('that man'/'he'); puḻōl-> pḻōlu (> prōlu) ('city')
Voicing of word-initial stops was progressive in some words. Both voiced and voiceless word-initials were recorded in inscriptions and might vary dialectally.
eg: tūṟu > dūṟu ('to enter'); kaḍacina > gaḍicina ('that which is passed')
Labial | Dental | Alveolar | Retroflex | Palatal | Velar | Glottal | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nasal | m (మ) | n (న) | ɳ (ణ) | |||||
Stop | Voiceless | p (ప) | t̪ (త) | ʈ (ట) | tʃ (చ) | k (క) | ||
Aspirated | pʰ (ఫ) | t̪ʰ (థ) | ʈʰ (ఠ) | tʃʰ (ఛ) | kʰ (ఖ) | |||
Voiced | b (బ) | d̪ (ద) | d (ౚ,న్ఱ్) | ɖ (డ) | dʒ (జ) | g (గ) | ||
Breathy | bʰ (భ) | d̪ʰ (ధ) | ɖʰ (ఢ) | dʒʰ (ఝ) | gʰ (ఘ) | |||
Fricative | s (స) | ʂ (ష) | ʃ (శ) | h (హ) | ||||
Approximant | ʋ (వ) | l (ల) | ɭ (ళ) | y (య) | ||||
Rhotic | ɾ (ర), r (ఱ) |
ɻ (ఴ) |
- nḏ has its reflex being voiced retroflex stop in Modern Telugu, <ṟṟ> was either pronounced (derived from /r/) or (from PD *ṯṯ), former became rr while latter became ṭṭ, eg. goṟiya, puṟṟa > goṟṟe, puṟṟa > gorre, puṭṭa.
- ḻ became a stop intervocalically by Middle Telugu and a r in clusters in Middle Telugu, *kuḻ- > OTe. kḻocce > MiTe. krocce > Te. kocce.
- Most pre-plosive nasals got deleted by nasalizing the previous vowel in Middle Telugu and later loosing nasalization in Modern Telugu, eg. teluṅgu > telũgu > telugu and other various cluster simplifications like krōlu > kōlu.
- Modern Telugu is mostly free from retroflex ḷ and ṇ. However, dialectally ḷ is preserved as a geminate in plurals (from PDr plural *-Vḷ) as in *nīr-ḷ(u) > nīḷḷu ('waters') and regularly after retroflex ḍ and dental l, eg.: guḍi-ḷu > guḷḷu ('temples') and pagul-ḷu > paguḷḷu ('breakages').
Morphology
Old Telugu is an agglutinative language primarily utilizing suffixes to express grammatical relationships. Noun morphology included gender markers and various derivational processes, while verb morphology was highly developed with distinct markers for tense, mood, and aspect.
Old Telugu preserved the two-way masculine vs non-masculine gender pattern intact, which is said to be the original case with Proto-Dravidian and this is also inherited by Modern Telugu.
Telugu branch is evidenced to have inherited three distinct plural markers which are: -ḷ, -kVḷ and -r. By the time of early writings, -kVḷ marker underwent back-stem formation with the root words, losing its status as a distinct plural marker, eg. mrā̃-kulu (< *maran-kVḷ), later getting analyzed as mrā̃ku-lu, creating a root mrā̃ku (> Modern māku). Other examples include goḍugu, ciluka, eluka.
The noun formative was -ambu, later -amu/-am > -aũ, eg. OTe. paṭṭambu ('authority/power') > MTe./Te. paṭṭamu/paṭṭam > spoken Te. paṭṭaũ (coastal dialects).
Old Telugu and Proto-Dravidian maintained contrast in nominative and oblique forms of masculine singulars; as in wāṉḏu (nom.) vs wāni- (obl.), which is dialectally preserved in Modern Telugu.
Parts of speech
Nouns in Old Telugu could be primary or derived, with primary nouns often being free forms and derived nouns formed through suffixation. Gender was signaled by specific suffixes and the overall morphology was influenced by both native Dravidian elements and Indo-Aryan borrowings.
Verbs
Old Telugu verbs were categorized into finite and non-finite forms, with various suffixes indicating tense, mood, and agreement with subjects.
The language had two primary tense paradigms: past, non-past.
Past and non-past markers in Old Telugu were: -iti- (a combination of PDr past markers *-i- and *-tt-) and -VdV- (< PDr non-past *-t-) respectively. Pure past marker *-iy/*-i appeared in third person. These markers were followed by personal terminations, also varied by number.
an- : 'to say' | Past | Non-Past | |
---|---|---|---|
1st person | singular | an-iti-n | an-eda-n
an-udu-n |
plural | an-iti-m | an-eda-m
an-udu-m | |
2nd person | singular | an-iti-w | an-eda-w
an-udu-w |
plural | an-iti-r | an-eda-r
an-udu-r | |
3rd person | sg/non-h.plu | an-iy-en | an-un |
human plural | an-i-r | an-eda-r
an-udu-r |
Pronouns
The pronominal system in Old Telugu marked person, number, and gender. Reflexive pronouns and a range of demonstratives, interrogatives, and indefinites were also used.
Nominative | Oblique | ||
---|---|---|---|
1st person | singular | ēn
nēn, nān |
nā
nan- |
plural | ēm
nēm, mēm, manam (in.) |
mā (ex.)
mana (in.) mam- | |
2nd person | singular | īw,
nīw |
nī
nin- |
plural | īr,
*nīr, mīr |
mī
mim- | |
Reflexive | singular | tān | tan- |
plural | tām,
tamar, tār |
tam- |
- The third person is formed by personal & gender markers on demonstratives. eg.: *awanṯu > wāṉḏu (> wāḍu) : 'that man'; *iwanṯu > wīṉḏu (> wīḍu) : 'this man'; a-di : 'that thing' etc.
Declension
Case | maganḏu ('man'/'son') | cēy(i) ('hand') | koṭṭaṁbuḷ ('fortresses') |
---|---|---|---|
Accusative | maganin | cētin | koṭṭaṁbuḷan |
Instrumental | maganicētan
maganitōḻan |
cētitōḻan | koṭṭaṁbuḷatōḻan
koṭṭaṁbuḷacētan |
Dative | maganiki(n) | cētiki(n) | koṭṭaṁbuḷaku(n) |
Ablative | magani-nuṇḍi
magani-nuñci |
cēti-nuṇḍi
cēti-nuñci |
koṭṭaṁbuḷa-nuṇḍi
koṭṭaṁbuḷa-nuñci |
Genitive | magani | cēti | koṭṭaṁbuḷa |
Locative | maganiyandun
maganiyoḷan maganiḷōn |
cētiyandun cētiyoḷan cētiḷōn |
koṭṭaṁbuḷandun
koṭṭaṁbuḷan koṭṭaṁbuḷoḷan koṭṭaṁbuḷaḷōn |
Syntax
The structure of Old Telugu sentences typically involved nominative-accusative alignment, with case markers indicating the grammatical roles of nouns. The language employed a variety of case forms and postpositions to express detailed semantic relations.
Numerals
English | Old Telugu |
Modern Telugu |
---|---|---|
"one" | oṉḏu |
oṇḍu okaṭi |
"two" | reṇḍu
*rēṇḍu *eraṇḍu |
reṇḍu |
"three" | mūṉḏu |
mūḍu |
"four" | nāluṅgu |
nālugu |
"five" | ēnu |
ayidu ēnu |
"six" | āṟu |
āru |
"seven" | ēḻu |
ēḍu |
"eight" | eṇimidi
eṇumbodi |
enimidi |
"nine" | tonbidi
tombidi |
tommidi |
"ten" | padi
-bʰadi/-ppʰadi |
padi
-bʰay/-ppʰay |
"twelve" | padireṇḍu
paṇḍṟeṇḍu panreṇḍu |
panneṇḍu |
"sixty" | aṟawadi | araway |
"hundred" | nūṟu | nūru |
"thousand" | wēyi | wēyi
weyyi |
- Telugu is the only Dravidian language to have a native word for "thousand" (wēyi), while other literary languages borrowed Indo-Aryan sahasra.
- The reconstructed PDr laryngeal *H (PDr *paHtu) has its reflex being an aspiration as -bʰadi/-ppʰadi in the multiples of ten.
Primary Colours
There are four primary colours in Old Telugu, with the root words being:
weḷ-/teḷ- : 'white'; kār- : 'black'; kem-/cem- : 'red'; pacc-/pas- : 'green' & 'yellow'.
Both Old Telugu and Proto-Dravidian had absence of roots which distinguish green and yellow colours, a feature which still exists in Modern Telugu.
Sample Text
Indukur & Potladurthi inscriptions (600 CE)
svasti srī cōḻa mahārājull ēḷan erigal dugarājul iccina pannasa kocciya pāṟa rēvasarmmārikīni ḻaccina wāṉḏu pañcamahāpataka samyuktuṉḏagu...
...oḷana inpuḻōli aṇapōtulu rēvaṇakālu puddaṇakālu iccina pannasa pen pāṟa iseṟēnikin dīni ḻaccina wāṉḏu pañcamahāpatakuṉḏagun asivairuvu likitam...
Addanki Inscription (848 CE)
paṭṭambu gaṭṭina prathamambu nēṇḍu balagarvvaṁ boppaṅga bai lēci sēna paṭṭambu gaṭṭiñci prabhu baṇḍa raṅgu bañcina samatta paḍuvatō bōya koṭṭãbulvaṇḍreṇḍu goṇi vēṅgi nāḍin goḷalci (ya) tribhuvanāṅkuśa bāṇa nilpi kaṭṭepu durggaambu gaḍu bayalsēsi kaṇḍukūr bejavāḍa gāviñcemecci...
Bezawada inscription of Yuddhamalla (898 CE)
...velayaṅga niyyeṭṭu ḻissi malinurai viḍisina vrōla gala tānapatulunu rājupaṭṭambu gaṭṭina patiyu naliyaṁ bayvūrala velvariñcina naśvamēdhambu phalambu pēkṣiñcina liṅgaṁ baḻisina pāpambu damaku...
Research Work
See also
References
- * P. Ramasubramayam, "Old Telugu" in Sanford B. Steever, ed., The Dravidian Languages (London: Routledge, 2019) pp. 239-260.
- Kolichala, Suresh. "Divergent developments of the alveolar stop *ṯ in Telugu".
- "ప్రాచీనాంధ్రశాసనాలు (క్రీ.శ. 1100వరకు) (పాఠ, పదకోశ, సంగ్రహభాషా చరిత్రలతో)". 1971.
- Krishnamurti (2003).
Sources
- Krishnamurti, B. (2003). The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-77111-0.
- Ramasubramayam, P. (2019). "Old Telugu". In Stever, Sanford (ed.). The Dravidian Languages (2nd ed.). Routledge. pp. 1–44. ISBN 978-1-138-85376-8.
- Steever, Sanford (2019). "Introduction to the Dravidian languages". In Steever, Sanford (ed.). The Dravidian Languages (2nd ed.). Routledge. pp. 1–44. ISBN 978-1-138-85376-8.