Misplaced Pages

Semi-Italian Opening

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Paris Defence) Chess opening

Chess opening
Semi-Italian Opening
abcdefgh
8a8 black rookc8 black bishopd8 black queene8 black kingf8 black bishopg8 black knighth8 black rooka7 black pawnb7 black pawnc7 black pawnf7 black pawng7 black pawnh7 black pawnc6 black knightd6 black pawne5 black pawnc4 white bishope4 white pawnf3 white knighta2 white pawnb2 white pawnc2 white pawnd2 white pawnf2 white pawng2 white pawnh2 white pawna1 white rookb1 white knightc1 white bishopd1 white queene1 white kingh1 white rook8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Moves1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 d6
ECOC50
OriginRodzinski vs. Alekhine, Paris 1913
Named afterItalian Opening (Giuoco Piano)
ParentItalian Game
Synonym(s)
  • Half Giuoco Piano
  • Lesser Giuoco Piano
  • Paris Defence

The Semi-Italian Opening (also known as Half Giuoco Piano, Lesser Giuoco Piano, and Paris Defence) is one of Black's responses to the Italian Game. It begins with the moves:

1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 d6

Black's intent is to play a Hungarian Defense with an early ...Bg4, fighting for control of the d4-square. The line was tried by Alexander Alekhine early in his career. The first recorded use in international competition was in 1846. I. A. Horowitz called the defence "solid", also writing: "It does not seem quite sufficient for equality."

The Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings code for the Semi-Italian is C50.

This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.

Lines

Main line: 4.c3

4.d4 Bg4

After 4...exd4 5.Nxd4 Nf6 6.Nc3 White has the freer game according to Paul Keres, and instead of 5...Nf6, Larry Evans has suggested 5...g6!? The move 4...Be7 transposes to the Hungarian Defense.

  • 5.c3 and now:
    • 5...Qd7 and White has some space advantage after either 6.d5 or 6.Bb5 (Keres), or 6.Be3 (Evans).
    • 5...Nf6 6.Qb3 with a clear advantage for White (Keres).
    • 5...Qf6 6.Be3 Bxf3 7.Qxf3 with some advantage for White (Keres).
    • 5...Qe7 transposes to the Main line.
  • 5.h3! and White is slightly better, for example 5...Bxf3 6.Qxf3 and now:

4.h3

White prevents Black's thematic ...Bg4. The reply 4.h3 leads to lines similar to the Hungarian Defense, for example 4... Be7 5. d4 and now:

  • 5...Nf6 6.d5 Nb8 7.Bd3 0-0 8.Be3 a5 9.g4!? (Keres preferred 9.c4) Na6 10.Qd2 c6 11.c4 Nd7 12.Nc3 Ndc5 leading to a sharp game with balanced chances in Viktor Kupreichik–Podgayets, USSR 1970.
  • 5...Nxd4 6.Nxd4 exd4 7.Qh5 g6 8.Qd5 Be6 9.Qxb7 Nf6 10.Bxe6 fxe6 11.Qc6+ Kf7 12.Nd2 Qd7 13.Qc4 c5 14.0-0 d5 (Gyula SaxBorislav Ivkov, Amsterdam 1976) with an even game (Unzicker).

4.Nc3

This transposes to the game Maslov–Anatoly Lutikov, USSR 1963, which continued 4...Bg4 5.h3 Bxf3 6.Qxf3 Nf6 7.Ne2 (or 7.d3) and White stands slightly better (Keres, Miroslav Filip). For 5...Bh5?, see Légal Trap.

Notable games

abcdefgh
8a8 white queenf8 black bishoph8 black rooka7 black pawnc7 black pawnd7 black kingg7 black pawnh7 black pawnc6 black knightd6 black pawne5 black pawnc4 black queene4 white pawng4 black bishopc3 white pawnf3 white pawna2 white pawnb2 white pawnd2 white pawng2 white pawnh2 white pawna1 white rookb1 white knightc1 white bishope1 white kingh1 white rook8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 11.f3

Rodzinski vs. Alekhine, Paris 1913:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 d6 4. c3 Bg4 5. Qb3!?

5.d4, the Main line, is better.

5... Qd7 6. Ng5?!

6.Bxf7+ Qxf7 7.Qxb7 Kd7 8.Qxa8 Bxf3 9.gxf3 Qxf3 10.Rg1 Qxe4+ 11.Kd1 Qf3+ 12.Ke1 Qe4+ with perpetual check (Alekhine); or 12...e4 13.Na3 Ne5 14.Qxa7 Nd3+ 15.Kf1 with an even game according to Veniamin Sozin, but Black forces mate with 15...Qd1+ 16.Kg2 Nf4+ 17.Kg3 Qf3+ 18.Kh4 Qh3+ 19.Kg5 Ne6#.

6... Nh6 7. Nxf7 Nxf7 8. Bxf7+ Qxf7 9. Qxb7 Kd7 10. Qxa8 Qc4 11. f3 (diagram) Bxf3! 12. gxf3 Nd4 13. d3?

13.cxd4 Qxc1+ with clear advantage for Black.

13... Qxd3 14. cxd4 Be7 15. Qxh8 Bh4# 0–1

See also

References

  1. Hooper & Whyld (1996), p. 165. Half Giuoco Piano.
  2. ^ Horowitz (1964), p. 39
  3. Hooper & Whyld (1996), p. 223. Lesser Giuoco Piano.
  4. Hooper & Whyld (1996), p. 290. Paris Defence.
  5. Kasparov & Keene (1982), p. 309.
  6. ^ Hooper & Whyld (1996), p. 365. Semi-Italian Opening.
  7. ^ Kasparov & Keene (1982), pp. 308, 309.
  8. ^ Harding & Botterill (1977), pp. 129–30.
  9. ^ Horowitz (1964), pp. 39–41.
  10. "Grigory Levenfish vs. Alexander Kazimirovich Tolush, USSR Championship 1939". Chessgames.com.
  11. "Viktor Gavrikov vs. Evgeny Yuryevich Vladimirov, Vilnius 1978". Chessgames.com.
  12. "Viktor Kupreichik vs. Mikhail Podgaets, USSR 1970". Chessgames.com.
  13. "Gyula Sax vs. Borislav Ivkov, Amsterdam 1976". Chessgames.com.
  14. Matanović (1981), p. 227, n. 1.
  15. "Leonid P Maslov vs. Anatoly S Lutikov, Kharkov 1963". Chessgames.com.
  16. Matanović (1981), p. 243, n. 8.
  17. Matanović (1981), p. 242, n. 4.
  18. "Rodzynski vs. Alexander Alekhine, Paris 1913". Chessgames.com.

Bibliography

Chess
Outline
Equipment
History
Rules
Terms
Tactics
Strategy
Openings
Flank opening
King's Pawn Game
Queen's Pawn Game
Other
Endgames
Tournaments
Art and media
Related
Category: