Misplaced Pages

Parton v Milk Board (Vic)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Judgement of the High Court of Australia

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Parton v Milk Board" Vic – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Parton v Milk Board (Vic)
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Decided21 December 1949
Citations[1949] HCA 67, (1949) 80 CLR 229
Court membership
Judges sittingLatham CJ, Rich, Dixon, McTiernan and Williams JJ
Case opinions
(3:2) The broad approach to excise in section 90 is to be taken (per Rich, Dixon & Williams JJ; Latham CJ & McTiernan J dissenting)

Parton v Milk Board (Vic), is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with the meaning of excise in relation to section 90 of the Australian Constitution.

In this case, the tax was calculated as a fixed amount per gallon of milk, and imposed on retailers, instead of at the production phase; this was held to be invalid as imposing a duty of excise. This heralded in the broad approach to section 92 - where a "tax upon a commodity at any point in the course of distribution before it reaches the consumer produces the same effect as a tax upon its manufacture or production" (per Dixon J). Rich and Williams JJ agreed with Dixon J, stating that a tax at a later stage in the handling of a good is in effect a tax on the production or manufacture of the good.

Latham CJ dissented, using Peterswald v Bartley, and McTiernan J felt that it should be employed in a narrower sense, to make it fit within what he perceived to be the object of the section, which was to promote a "uniform fiscal policy for the Commonwealth".

See also

References

  1. Parton v Milk Board (Vic) [1949] HCA 67, (1949) 80 CLR 229 (21 December 1949), High Court.
  2. Peterswald v Bartley [1904] HCA 21, (1904) 1 CLR 497 (31 August 1904), High Court.
  • Winterton, G. et al. Australian federal constitutional law: commentary and materials, 1999. LBC Information Services, Sydney.
Categories: