Misplaced Pages

Crest factor

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Peak-to-average ratio) Peak divided by the Root mean square (RMS) of the waveform

Crest factor is a parameter of a waveform, such as alternating current or sound, showing the ratio of peak values to the effective value. In other words, crest factor indicates how extreme the peaks are in a waveform. Crest factor 1 indicates no peaks, such as direct current or a square wave. Higher crest factors indicate peaks, for example sound waves tend to have high crest factors.

Crest factor is the peak amplitude of the waveform divided by the RMS value of the waveform.

The peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) is the peak amplitude squared (giving the peak power) divided by the RMS value squared (giving the average power). It is the square of the crest factor.

When expressed in decibels, crest factor and PAPR are equivalent, due to the way decibels are calculated for power ratios vs amplitude ratios.

Crest factor and PAPR are therefore dimensionless quantities. While the crest factor is defined as a positive real number, in commercial products it is also commonly stated as the ratio of two whole numbers, e.g., 2:1. The PAPR is most used in signal processing applications. As it is a power ratio, it is normally expressed in decibels (dB). The crest factor of the test signal is a fairly important issue in loudspeaker testing standards; in this context it is usually expressed in dB.

The minimum possible crest factor is 1, 1:1 or 0 dB.

Examples

This table provides values for some normalized waveforms. All peak magnitudes have been normalized to 1.

Wave type Waveform RMS value Crest factor PAPR (dB)
DC 1 1 0.0 dB
Sine wave 1 2 ≈ 0.707 {\displaystyle {1 \over {\sqrt {2}}}\approx 0.707} 2 ≈ 1.414 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}\approx 1.414} 3.01 dB
Full-wave rectified sine 1 2 ≈ 0.707 {\displaystyle {1 \over {\sqrt {2}}}\approx 0.707} 2 ≈ 1.414 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}\approx 1.414} 3.01 dB
Half-wave rectified sine 1 2 = 0.5 {\displaystyle {1 \over 2}=0.5} 2 {\displaystyle 2\,} 6.02 dB
Triangle wave 1 3 ≈ 0.577 {\displaystyle {1 \over {\sqrt {3}}}\approx 0.577} 3 ≈ 1.732 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {3}}\approx 1.732} 4.77 dB
Square wave 1 1 0 dB
PWM signal
V(t) ≥ 0.0 V		 t 1 T {\displaystyle {\sqrt {\frac {t_{1}}{T}}}} T t 1 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {\frac {T}{t_{1}}}}}

20 log ⁡ ( T t 1 ) {\displaystyle 20\log {\mathord {\left({\frac {T}{t_{1}}}\right)}}}  dB

QPSK 1 1 1.761 dB
8PSK 3.3 dB
π⁄4-DQPSK 3.0 dB
OQPSK 3.3 dB
8VSB 6.5–8.1 dB
64QAM 3 7 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {\frac {3}{7}}}} 7 3 ≈ 1.528 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {\frac {7}{3}}}\approx 1.528} 3.7 dB
∞ {\displaystyle \infty } -QAM 1 3 ≈ 0.577 {\displaystyle {1 \over {\sqrt {3}}}\approx 0.577} 3 ≈ 1.732 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {3}}\approx 1.732} 4.8 dB
WCDMA downlink carrier 10.6 dB
OFDM 4 ~12 dB
GMSK 1 1 0 dB
Gaussian noise σ {\displaystyle \sigma } ∞ {\displaystyle \infty } ∞ {\displaystyle \infty } dB
Periodic chirp 1 2 ≈ 0.707 {\displaystyle {1 \over {\sqrt {2}}}\approx 0.707} 2 ≈ 1.414 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}\approx 1.414} 3.01 dB

Notes:

  1. Crest factors specified for QPSK, QAM, WCDMA are typical factors needed for reliable communication, not the theoretical crest factors which can be larger.

Crest factor reduction

Many modulation techniques have been specifically designed to have constant envelope modulation, i.e., the minimum possible crest factor of 1:1.

In general, modulation techniques that have smaller crest factors usually transmit more bits per second than modulation techniques that have higher crest factors. This is because:

  1. any given linear amplifier has some "peak output power"—some maximum possible instantaneous peak amplitude it can support and still stay in the linear range;
  2. the average power of the signal is the peak output power divided by the crest factor;
  3. the number of bits per second transmitted (on average) is proportional to the average power transmitted (Shannon–Hartley theorem).

Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) is a very promising modulation technique; perhaps its biggest problem is its high crest factor. Many crest factor reduction techniques (CFR) have been proposed for OFDM. The reduction in crest factor results in a system that can either transmit more bits per second with the same hardware, or transmit the same bits per second with lower-power hardware (and therefore lower electricity costs and less expensive hardware), or both. Over the years, numerous model-driven approaches have been proposed to reduce the PAPR in communication systems. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in exploring data-driven models for PAPR reduction as part of ongoing research in end-to-end communication networks. These data-driven models offer innovative solutions and new avenues of exploration to address the challenges posed by high PAPR effectively. By leveraging data-driven techniques, researchers aim to enhance the performance and efficiency of communication networks by optimizing power utilization.

This article appears to contain a large number of buzzwords. There might be a discussion about this on the talk page. Please help improve this article if you can. (August 2023)

Crest factor reduction methods

Various methods for crest factor reduction exist, such as peak windowing, noise shaping, pulse injection and peak cancellation.

Applications

  • Electrical engineering — for describing the quality of an AC power waveform
  • Vibration analysis — for estimating the amount of impact wear in a bearing
  • Radio and audio electronics — for estimating the headroom required in a signal chain
    • Music has a widely varying crest factor. Typical values for a processed mix are around 4–8 (which corresponds to 12–18 dB of headroom, usually involving audio level compression), and 8–10 for an unprocessed recording (18–20 dB).
  • Physiology — for analysing the sound of snoring

See also

References

  1. "Wireless 101: Peak to average power ratio (PAPR)".
  2. JBL Speaker Power Requirements, which is applying the IEC standard 268-5, itself more recently renamed to 60268-5
  3. AES2-2012 standard, Annex B (Informative) Crest Factor, pp. 17-20 in the 2013-02-11 printing
  4. "Dr. Pro-Audio", Power handling, summarizes the various speaker standards
  5. ^ "RMS and Average Values for Typical Waveforms". Archived from the original on 2010-01-23.
  6. Palicot, Jacques; Louët, Yves. POWER RATIO DEFINITIONS AND ANALYSIS IN SINGLE CARRIER MODULATIONS (PDF). IETR/Supélec - Campus de Rennes. p. 2.
  7. ^ "Read steer_rf_chapter1.pdf". Archived from the original on 2016-03-22. Retrieved 2014-12-11.
  8. "Transitioning transmitters to COFDM". Archived from the original on 2009-08-21. Retrieved 2009-06-17.
  9. ^ R. Wolf; F. Ellinger; R.Eickhoff; Massimiliano Laddomada; Oliver Hoffmann (14 July 2011). Periklis Chatzimisios (ed.). Mobile Lightweight Wireless Systems: Second International ICST Conference, Mobilight 2010, May 10-12, 2010, Barcelona, Spain, Revised Selected Papers. Springer. p. 164. ISBN 978-3-642-16643-3. Retrieved 13 December 2012.
  10. Op Amp Noise Theory and Applications Archived 2014-11-30 at the Wayback Machine - 10.2.1 rms versus P-P Noise
  11. Chapter 1 First-Order Low-Pass Filtered Noise - "The standard deviation of a Gaussian noise voltage is the root-mean-square or rms value of the voltage."
  12. Noise: Frequently Asked Questions - "Noise theoretically has an unbounded distribution so that it should have an infinite crest factor"
  13. Telecommunications Measurements, Analysis, and Instrumentation, Kamilo Feher, section 7.2.3 Finite Crest Factor Noise
  14. "Crest Factor Reduction of an OFDM/WiMAX Network".
  15. "Low Crest Factor Modulation Techniques for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM)" Archived 2017-08-29 at the Wayback Machine.
  16. R. Neil Braithwaite. "Crest Factor Reduction for OFDM Using Selective Subcarrier Degradation" Archived 2018-08-06 at the Wayback Machine.
  17. K. T. Wong, B. Wang & J.-C. Chen, "OFDM PAPR Reduction by Switching Null Subcarriers & Data-Subcarriers," Electronics Letters, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 62-63 January, 2011 Archived 2015-09-23 at the Wayback Machine.
  18. S.C. Thompson, "Constant Envelope OFDM Phase Modulation," PhD Dissertation, UC San Diego, 2005.
  19. Nick Wells. "DVB-T2 in relation to the DVB-x2 Family of Standards" Archived 2013-05-26 at the Wayback Machine quote: "techniques which can reduce the PAPR, ... could result in a significant saving in electricity costs."
  20. Huleihel, Yara; Ben-Dror, Eilam; Permuter, Haim H. (2020). Low PAPR Waveform Design for OFDM Systems Based on Convolutional Autoencoder. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS). pp. 1-6.
  21. "What Is The "Crest Factor" And Why Is It Used?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-27. Retrieved 2006-03-07.
  22. Crest factor analysis for complex signal processing Archived 2006-04-27 at the Wayback Machine
  23. PAPR simulation for 64QAM
  24. Crest factor definition — AES Pro Audio Reference
  25. "Level Practices in Digital Audio". Archived from the original on 2009-06-18. Retrieved 2009-10-11.
  26. Gain Structure — Setting the System Levels Archived 2007-09-28 at the Wayback Machine, ] Mixer Tips
  27. Setting sound system level controls: The most expensive system set up wrong never performs as well as an inexpensive system set up correctly.
  28. Palatal snoring identified by acoustic crest factor analysis

General

Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from Federal Standard 1037C. General Services Administration. Archived from the original on 2022-01-22. (in support of MIL-STD-188).

External links

Waveforms
Category: